Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6-C_PUT ON CD_Completed Project Info Forms_Update Appendix 6-C Completed Project Information Forms 2018 Completed Project Forms 2014 Completed Project Forms Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Dan Olsen Name of Secondary Contact Alex Terrazas Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee, CA 96161 E-mail dolsen@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2920 Other Cooperating Placer County,Truckee River Watershed Council,Truckee Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Donner Parks and Recreation District Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Aquatic Invasive Species Programs Project Category iJ Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control R Water Supply/Wastewater Project Description Implementation of an Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) program within (Briefly describe the project, in Truckee which will include purchase of equipment to decontaminate 300 words or less) motorized vessels, a mandatory inspection program for motorized vessels, implementation of sticker program, and education and outreach at key locations for non-motorized vehicles and recreational uses. The program will be modeled after the program currently being implemented in the Lake Tahoe basin. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 6 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes. Lake Tahoe AIS Coordination Committee and the Lake Tahoe a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Regional AIS Management Plan EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Various waterbodies within Truckee Longitude: Various waterbodies within Truckee Project Location Description Various waterbodies within Truckee (e.g., along the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- -- standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in Fi N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2-Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as F_ Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F,,- N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems F_ Yes continues to meet Federal and State F- N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r- N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. Fi N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. Fi N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for R- N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural R- N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The introduction or measurement of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r- Yes establishment of aquatic areas where associated uplands to support healthy F N/A invasive species is damaging species are watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife to the native environment. removed and and plant habitats. Established communities of restored with AIS can cause considerable native species damage to water quality, water supply, recreation, and native species habitat and diversity which affects the economic and ecological health of the region and watershed. Prevention of the introduction and establishment of these species will help enhance and Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM restore the watershed. ER2 - Develop and implement Prevention of the The number of programs to prevent the spread of r Yes introduction or boats existing invasive species and F N/A establishment of aquatic decontaminated colonization of potential future invasive species is damaging would be invasive species. to the native environment. measured. Established communities of Education and AIS can cause considerable outreach damage to water quality, programs water supply, recreation, and developed. native species habitat and diversity which affects the economic and ecological health of the watershed ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. r N/A ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- caused by existing and new Yes development. F N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The implementation of the -- water-related planning activities r Yes AIS program would require within the planning horizon as F N/A coordination with adjacent supported by current and future programs and agencies watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The implementation of the Inter-agency multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes AIS program would require agreements and Region for information exchange. F N/A coordination with adjacent coordination programs and agencies IWM3 - Increase public education and Project will include project Number of awareness of watershed functions, F Yes outreach and education outreach events, protection and restoration needs to F N/A effort including signs, publications encourage stewardship by the public. handout materials, and a distributed, boats watercraft certification certified/inspecte program d. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes F N/A Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge,flood management) in local and regional r N/A planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with regional planning. N/A If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F N/A The Truckee River terminates in considerations. Pyramid Lake, located within the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Reservation. Prevention of aquatic species in the upper watershed will benefit the downstream community. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r- N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. F- N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r- N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F- N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes F' No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local IJ Yes F No -- System Reoperation r Yes F*I- No -- Water Transfers I— Yes F No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes No -- Desalination r Yes No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes P— No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes r No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F' No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes No -- Pollution Prevention r' Yes No Project prevents the introduction of invasive species which degrade water quality and benefits. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes F No This program prevents the Water Pricing) establishment of AIS which has potential to degrade the environment, reducing the economic health of the community. Maintaining a healthy Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? environment helps maintain a healthy tourist economy. Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F_ No This program prevents the establishment of AIS which has potential to degrade the environment, reducing the economic health of the community. Maintaining a healthy environment helps maintain a healthy tourist economy. Forest Management r Yes F No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes Fv- No -- Recharge Areas Protection r- Yes No -- Water-dependent Recreation W Yes r No This program prevents the establishment of AIS which has potential to degrade the environment, reducing the economic health of the community. Maintaining a healthy environment helps maintain a healthy tourist economy. Watershed Management r Yes r No This program prevents the establishment of AIS which has potential to degrade the environment, reducing the economic health of the community. Maintaining a healthy environment helps maintain a healthy tourist economy. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes F No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1000000 $ 0 1000000 OR F- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $45,000 0 45000 &M)Maintenance (O b.Can the Project be phased? Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 0 0 Mandatory Inspection and certification of watercraft Phase 2 0 0 Education and outreach material and signs Phase 3 0 0 AIS eradication programs Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Some funding will be $25,000 annually cost generated by the boat inspection and certification fees d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding General Fund $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Maintenance will continue to be performed by will be financed for the 25-year planning Town of Truckee Public Works/Street Maintenance period for project implementation (not grant Division Staff(funded through local funds)for signs. funded). Continued implementation of the inspection program will be funded by the inspection and permit fees. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Existing program at Lake Tahoe planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes 1v No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The project would not be implemented. the project is not funded. (300 words or less) Establishment of AIS in the area will degrade the environment and have a detrimental economic impact on the tourist based economy and surface water supply. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and 7 Yes -- 12/1/201 4/1/2014 Evaluation No 3 N/A b. Final Design f- Yes -- 1/1/2014 4/1/2015 r r No N/A c. Environmental f Yes -- 4/1/2014 8/1/2014 Documentation No (CEQA/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting f Yes -- 4/1/2015 4/1/2018 r No N/A e. Construction r Yes -- -- 5/1/2015 Contracting r No N/A f. Construction r Yes -- 5/1/2015 10/1/2018 Implementation r F—, No N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Aquatic Nuisance Species Taskforce project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Strategic Plan Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the See above feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much A pilot project was conducted for research has been conducted) of the proposed project in voluntary watercraft inspections. 300 words or less. Lake Tahoe conducts mandatory watercraft inspections and this program would be modeled after it. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. I Yes No v N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management I Yes I No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes No v N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No v N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the I Yes I No N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the Yes F No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Kim Garon Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title BMP Implementation on STPUD Operating Sites Project Category P Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The overarching goal of the Project is to benefit the water quality of (Briefly describe the project, in Lake Tahoe by reducing erosion, sediment flow, and surface water 300 words or less) runoff originating from STPUD facilities. More specifically, the objectives of the Project are to:1. Reduce sediment loads and nutrients delivered to Lake Tahoe through tributary runoff, urban runoff, and groundwater;2. Install surface water best management practices (BMPs) at STPUD facilities throughout the tributary area;3. Restore existing disturbed areas to offset facility impacts; and 4. Restore SEZ's toward a proper functioning condition.These Project objectives will be pursued where feasible, appropriate, cost effective and consistent with District objectives. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Through the TMDL program, five counties, one city, U.S. Forest a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Service, and two state transportation departments collectively are EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so tasked with reducing fine sediment particles reaching the lake by 10 provide description. percent in the next five years and by 33 percent in 15 years. Political Support—List related STPUD is a partner in the Technical Advisory Committee for Erosion MOUs, agreements or TACs Control Project implementation, consisting of El Dorado County, City currently in place. of South Lake Tahoe, Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, US Forest Service, and other partners as appropriate. Project Location: Latitude: 38.92256 Longitude: -119.96914 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description The Best Management Practices Implementation and Erosion Control (e.g., along the south bank of Projects are located in the service area of South Lake Tahoe Public stream/river between river Utility District at operating sites throughout the City of South Lake miles or miles from Tahoe and El Dorado County. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes identifies the pollutants attainment date, and participate in r N/A responsible for the loss of the development of future TMDLs. transparency and their originating sources.Three pollutants,fine sediment particles, nitrogen, andphosphorus are responsible for the transparency impairment of Lake Tahoe andthese three pollutants enter the lake from diverse sources.This project will reduce/eliminate pollutants from entering the lake from these sources. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project identifies options 17 sites and 14 implementing measures such as r Yes for reducing pollutant loads projects stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A to Lake Tahoe from the major identified control/restoration to meet Water fine sediment particle and Quality Objectives (WQOs)for nutrient sources. BMP's receiving water bodies established in provide pollutant load the Basin Plan within the planning reduction to Lake Tahoe. horizon. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, The types of improvements -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes that are to be incorporated to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A into the Project include Local processes. restoration of natural flow paths,floodplains and wetlands. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. FV N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F_ Yes reliability. FV N/A Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Fv N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The BMP/Erosion controls of -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes this project benefit and associated uplands to support healthy r N/A restore the water quality of watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife Lake Tahoe. It will reduce and plant habitats. the sediments and nutrients delivered into Lake Tahoe. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and W N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes Erosion Control and Best -- caused by existing and new Management Practices help development. F N/A to minimize impacts of new and existing developments. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among STPUD has formed a public -- multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes and technical advisory Region for information exchange. r N/A committee to assist in the review and developments of the project. IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, r Yes protection and restoration needs to r N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that The types of improvements -- reduce flood risk. F40 Yes that are most likely to be F N/A incorporated into the Project include, local source controls to minimize sediment and nutrient mobilization, local hydrologic controls to minimize runoff and maximize infiltration, and local restoration of natural flow paths,floodplains and wetlands IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. This project address water -- water quality,water supply, r Yes quality issues and erosion groundwater recharge,flood r N/A problems. The management) in local and regional improvements control and planning efforts and support efforts minimize runoff and to continue improving the science. sediment and nutrient mobilization. Restoration of natural flow paths, floodplains and wetlands are also incorporated into this project. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A Yes, South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community and the project is located in this community. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas Iv' N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Urban Water Use Efficiency Fv Yes F_ No BMP/Erosion Control Projects help to increase urban water use efficiency. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes F%o- No -- System Reoperation F_ Yes FV_ No -- Water Transfers r Yes FV_ No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes r- No -- Desalination r Yes FV_ No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes FV_ No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes FV_ No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local !"' Yes F%o- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes FV_ No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes FV_ No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes FV_ No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes f— No This program will help minimize and control runoff and maximize infiltration Salt and Salinity Management j— Yes F%o- No -- Urban Runoff Management Yes F_ No BMP's help to control urban runoff Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes P No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes P No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration W Yes 1— No The BMP/Erosion controls of this project benefit and restore the water quality of Lake Tahoe. Forest Management Yes F%o- No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F%o- No -- Recharge Areas Protection )— Yes FV_ No -- Water-dependent Recreation !"' Yes F%o- No -- Watershed Management !"' Yes F%o- No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management Id Yes F_ No BMP/Erosion Control help reduce and control runoff. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 397000 $$99,250 0 496250 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $31,760 0 31760 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P/ Yes i— No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 129000 10586 STPUD plans on implementing the BMP's on 5 of the 17 projects on 13sites Phase 2 132000 10586 STPUD plans on implementing 6 of the 17 BMP projects on the 13 sites Phase 3 136000 10588 STPUD plans on implementing 6 of the 17 BMP projects on the 13 sites Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project STPUD Capitol $25,000 cost Improvement Funding d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs STPUD General Funds will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Planning documents planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W1 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if BMP implementation on the 13 existing sites the project is not funded. (300 words or less) would be postponed indefinitely without funding. This would impact the contribution of this project to the Lake Tahoe TMDL> 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Wo Yes -- 6/1/2008 6/1/2013 Evaluation No N/A b. Final Design r Yes -- 6/1/2012 6/1/2013 F No N/A c. Environmental Wo Yes -- 6/1/2012 6/1/2013 Documentation — No (CEQA/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting r Yes Permitting would occur 5/1/2015 10/1/2018 Wo No as each of the 17 projects were implemented as N/A part of the project. e. Construction Yes The 17 projects, 5/1/2015 10/1/2018 Contracting Wo No depending upon funding, would be grouped or r N/A phased and contracted to a single operator to save on implementation costs. The project would need to be bid and awarded. f. Construction r Yes This phase would be the 5/1/2015 10/1/2018 Implementation F%O- F%O- No actual implementation of the Best Management F_ N/A Practices on the 17 sites, either in groups as phased projects, or all on one contract, depending upon funding availability. Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is All final design and environmental documentation has been completed checked as current status on this project, however, project implementation would consist of three stages: permitting, contracting and implementation. Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed The planning and engineering design project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General will follow the guidelines provided in Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat the guidance document Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) "Formulating and Evaluating Alternative for Water Quality Improvement Projects,July 2004", utilized by the Storm Water Quality Improvement Committee (SWQIC) and CTC. BMP's are mandated by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) and are included in the Basin wide Environmental Improvement Program document available at www.trpa.org. b. List technical reports and studies supporting the USDA/Forest Service National Best feasibility of this project Management Practices for Water Quality Management, Existing Conditions Analysis Memorandum by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants 12/07, Design Performance Summary by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants 12/12, Final BMP Toolbox&Alternative Analysis by N H C 10/09 Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The focus of Heyvaert's applied research has been conducted)of the proposed project in research program investigates 300 words or less. sediment and nutrient removal processes by stormwater management techniques,which are known as best management practices (BMPs). BMPs in the Lake Tahoe basin range from constructed wetlands to highway sediment capture and nutrient removal structures. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes F No F,/_ N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management FV_ Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? IW Yes F No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F,/ Yes F No N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No IW N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No PO N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No FV_ N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F%o- Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r Yes F No F,/ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Jessica Thompson Name of Secondary Contact Dan Wilkins Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road E-mail jhompson@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2938 Other Cooperating Placer County,Truckee River Watershed Council, Local Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders businesses Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Permanant BMP Implementation, Inspection, and Maintenance Programs Project Category F Restoration ►r Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Two permanent BMP programs would be implemented with this (Briefly describe the project, in project and are required by the Phase 2 NPDES permit. The business 300 words or less) inspection program would include certain businesses listed in the Phase 2 Permit such as vehicle repair, building trades, and other businesses with potential to contribute pollutant loads provide appropriate BMPs for their business locations. The program would be implemented by educating applicable business owners or staff through a certification program. The Town would provide technical support and conduct site inspections to assist property owners in implementation of appropriate BMPs and LID options. The grant would also provide financial assistance to owners where retrofitting was required to reduce pollutant loads from the property. The program would include a self certification program for business owners as a way of continuing the program and ensuring on-going operation and maintenance. The second program would consist of a Stormwater Treatment and Hydromodification Management Operation and Maintenance verification program,which would be required for all new construction over 5,000sf of disturbed area and current properties that have been required to participate to date. As all new construction requires permanent BMPs, education and outreach for permanent BMP operation and maintenance would be provided to all residents. Properties that are required to participate in the Stormwater Treatment and Hydromodification Management Operation and Maintenance verification program (over 5,000sf of disturbed area) would participate in a self-certification program. In addition, mapping, inventory, and condition assessment of the Tahoe Sierra IRWM Stormwater Treatment and Hydromodification Measures would be implemented. A database would be developed and maintained of all properties and businesses required to participate,tracking of self certification reports, and any follow up or enforcement action taken. Water monitoring of some installed BMPs would be conducted to help guide future standard designs to determine the best design for this area and to continue to improve the effectiveness. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 10 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes.The proposed improvements would reduce sediment and other a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, pollutant loads entering the Truckee River which is a sediment EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so impaired water body. Reducing pollutant loads to the Truckee River is provide description. a requirement of the Phase 2 MS4 permit for Truckee and the TMDL requirements that are included in the permit. In addition to sediment, the proposed business inspection program would also provide pollutant load reduction for other pollutants of concern that adheres to sediment, such as heavy metals and oil and grease. Political Support—List related MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.32789 Longitude: -120.18158 Project Location Description The program will be conducted throughout Truckee. (e.g., along the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The project would help Pollutant load standards in accordance with the r Yes prevent and reduce reduction would attainment date, and participate in r N/A pollutants, including be calculated for the development of future TMDLs. sediment,from entering the the type of Truckee River. The Truckee BMP/LID River TMDL is for sediment treatment impairment and this would installed and provide a direct benefit in verified through meeting the TMDL goals. water quality monitoring WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project would assist Pollutant load implementing measures such as r Yes business owner in installing reduction would stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A stormwater BMPs and LID be calculated for control/restoration to meet Water retrofits, as well as the type of Quality Objectives (WQOs)for implementing an ongoing BMP/LID receiving water bodies established in maintenance program.This treatment the Basin Plan within the planning would help reduce pollutant installed. Other horizon. loads and meet WQOs in the forms of Basin Plan. monitoring/meas uring may be conducted depending on type. WQ3 - Implement water quality Water quality monitoring of Pollutant load monitoring programs through r Yes the effectiveness of the BMPs reduction would planning horizon, and coordinate i— N/A installed would be conducted be calculated for annually throughout the Region. as part of the program the type of BMP/LID treatment installed and verified through water quality monitoring. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year ly Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. F%' N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes This project would assist Number of caused by existing and new business owners in installing businesses that development. r N/A stormwater BMPs and LID are assisted with retrofits, as well as stormwater implementing an ongoing improvements. maintenance program.This would help reduce pollutant loads from existing businesses. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes Region for information exchange. r N/A Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and The education and outreach Number of awareness of watershed functions, r Yes of pollution prevention is participants protection and restoration needs to r N/A part of the program for the encourage stewardship by the public. general public as well as the businesses and property owners that would be required to participate. IWM4- Promote activities that Installation and maintenance Number of reduce flood risk. R Yes of Stormwater Treatment participants in r N/A Measures and the mandatory Hydromodification programs. Management measures are designed to retain and infiltrate water.This reduces flood risk. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Installation and maintenance Number of water quality,water supply, r Yes of Stormwater Treatment participants in groundwater recharge,flood F N/A Measures and the mandatory management) in local and regional Hydromodification programs. planning efforts and support efforts Management measures are to continue improving the science. designed to retain and infiltrate water.This reduces pollutant loads, provides groundwater recharge, and flood management. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A The Truckee River terminates in considerations. Pyramid Lake, located within the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Reservation. Reductions in sediment loads benefits this as well as the fisheries including Lahontan Cutthroat Trout. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Installation and maintenance of climate change3. Stormwater Treatment Measures and Hydromodification Management measures are designed to retain and infiltrate water.This reduces pollutant loads, provides groundwater recharge, and flood manangement. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Grant funds would help offset costs to not already mentioned elsewhere. property owners that would be required to retrofit business sites and would also provide an economic boost to professionals that design or construct any improvements. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes F,/- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes F,/- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r" Yes W No -- System Reoperation r" Yes r No -- Water Transfers r- Yes P No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes FV- No -- Desalination r Yes FV- No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes F%O No -- Recycled Municipal Water Yes F%O- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes FV- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes FV- No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes FV- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F%o No -- Pollution Prevention FV- Yes F No Installation and maintenance of Stormwater Treatment Measures and Hydromodification Management measures are designed to retain and infiltrate water.This reduces pollutant loads, provides groundwater recharge, and flood management. Salt and Salinity Management Yes r% No -- Urban Runoff Management Yes F No Installation and maintenance of Stormwater Treatment Measures and Hydromodification Management measures are designed to retain and infiltrate water.This reduces pollutant loads, provides groundwater recharge, and flood manangement. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes F%o- No -- Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Fv Yes F No Grant funds would help offset costs to Water Pricing) property owners that would be required to retrofit business sites and would also provide an economic boost to professionals that design or construct any improvements. Ecosystem Restoration FV_ Yes F_ No Installation and maintenance of Stormwater Treatment Measures and Hydromodification Management measures are designed to retain and infiltrate water.This reduces pollutant loads, provides groundwater recharge, and flood management. Forest Management Yes W No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F_ No -- Recharge Areas Protection r- Yes F,/_ No -- Water-dependent Recreation t` Yes F%_0 No -- Watershed Management r Yes F_ No Installation and maintenance of Stormwater Treatment Measures and Hydromodification Management measures are designed to retain and infiltrate water.This reduces pollutant loads, provides groundwater recharge, and flood management. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management FV_ Yes F_ No Installation and maintenance of Stormwater Treatment Measures and Hydromodification Management measures are designed to retain and infiltrate water.This reduces pollutant loads, provides groundwater recharge, and flood management. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 500000 $10% minimum can 0 550000 be available as needed OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? V Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 350000 15000 Business BMP inspection, retrofit, and certification program. Phase 2 200000 15000 Stormwater Treatment and Hydromodification Management Operation and Maintenance verification program Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding General Fund 10%minimum will be and certainty of the sources for Project cost. requested as project match is needed. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The operations and maintenance will consist of on- will be financed for the 25-year planning going certification classes, maintenance of the period for project implementation (not grant database, and inspections every 5 years after the funded). program is established f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W1 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The program will be implemented as education the project is not funded. (300 words or less) and outreach, but would not include retrofitting cost reimbursement, design assistance, or complimentary initial inspection. This is not anticipated to be as effective to implement as the program proposed. Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F_ Yes Outreach to businesses, 6/1/2014 6/1/2015 Evaluation FV Fv No development of inspection program, F N/A certification classes, and development of database. b. Final Design r Yes Inspection of businesses 6/1/2014 6/1/2015 r W No and development of plans and r` N/A recommendations for BMP retrofits if necessary c. Environmental r Yes -- -- -- Documentation r No (CEQA/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting r Yes -- -- -- No tv— N/A e. Construction r` Yes -- -- -- Contracting �` No W N/A f. Construction r Yes Businesses would 6/1/2015 6/1/2018 Implementation ry No contract for any necessary BMP retrofits. r` N/A Town would re-inspect and provide a reimbursement for portion of BMPs implemented. Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Phase 2 NPDES permit, Basin Plan project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Other programs have been feasibility of this project implemented in the area with similar techniques, such as the Truckee River Watershed Council's residential River Friendly Lanscaping Program, or the Tahoe Basin BMP program. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Initial research has been conducted research has been conducted) of the proposed project in on the anticipated number of 300 words or less. businesses that would need to participate. Permitting software and a business permitting application is currently in the procurement process. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. ;d Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The retrofits would be LID techniques where possible or a combination of LID and other methods to improve water quality. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No d N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes No k— N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements i— Yes No ,W N/A (CWC§525) Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No r%_0 N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F%O_ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior r Yes F No FV_ N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No FV_ N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r Yes F No FV_ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Jessica Thompson Name of Secondary Contact Mike Vaughan Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee, CA 96161 E-mail jhompson@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2938 Other Cooperating Truckee River Watershed Council,Teichert Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Truckee Coldstream Culvert Replacement Program Project Category P Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control P Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The Coldstream Road Culvert Project would reconstruct or replace the (Briefly describe the project, in culvert that contains Donner Creek and travels under Coldstream 300 words or less) Road. This culvert failed in the spring of 2012 and was temporarily reconstructed until a permanent fix could be implemented. The culvert has rusted out along the bottom and failed due to piping and erosion of soils around the outside of the culvert, causing the roadway to fail. The proposed project would fix the culvert, either by reconstructing the culvert to prevent additional piping and erosion or remove the culvert and replace it with an open bottom culvert. The replacement with an open bottom culvert is the preferred option, however, implementation of this will depend on funding. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 8 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to TMDL implementation a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related -- MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.32290 Longitude: -120.22716 Project Location Description Culvert located at Donner Creek and Coldstream Road. (e.g., along the south bank of Tahoe Sierra IRWM stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Will reduce sediment load to Sediment load. standards in accordance with the r Yes Donner Creek and ultimately attainment date, and participate in i— N/A the Truckee River. the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Will reduce sediment load to Sediment load. implementing measures such as r Yes Donner Creek and ultimately stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A the Truckee River. control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQS - Restore degraded streams, The project will restore the Acres of restored wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes ecological function of the creek.Acres of to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A creek. wetland. processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future r Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The project will restore the Acres of riparian bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes ecological function of the and wetland area associated uplands to support healthy r N/A creek. created. watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and V N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes New development in this Acres of riparian caused by existing and new area will use this road access. and wetland area development. r N/A Replacement of this culvert created. with an open bottom culvert will minimize the impacts necessary for improved access on this road. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the ly Yes Region for information exchange. r N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and There is an opportunity for Number of awareness of watershed functions, r Yes interpretive signage along interpretive signs. protection and restoration needs to r N/A the restoration project. encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes F%0 N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Trout Creek drains to the Truckee considerations. River,which terminates in Pyramid Lake, located within the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Reservation. Reductions in sediment loads benefits this as well as the fisheries including Lahontan Cutthroat Trout. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of P, N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A The project would include the emissions (e.g.green technology). installation of vegetation that would help lower the watertemperature to improve the cold water habitat of the creek. In addition, plants removecarbon dioxide from the air through carbon sequestration. Therefore, as the project willinstall a substantial amount of vegetation as a part of the restoration effort, it will helpslow the growth of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Provide flood protection and restores not already mentioned elsewhere. ecological function of creek. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes No -- Urban Water Use EfficiencyI Yes No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local r Yes Fv- No -- System Reoperation r Yes Wo No -- Water Transfers F- Yes Fv- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F- Yes Fv- No -- Desalination r Yes F%O- No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes Fv- No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes Fv- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes Fv- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r- Yes Fy, No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F%o No -- Matching Water Quality to Use Yes Fv- No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes F- No Project will implement erosion control measures and will reduce sediment load to the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management Yes :d No -- Urban Runoff Management 1, Yes r No Project will include facilities to treat urban runoff. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship Yes F%o- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F- Yes Fv- No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes No Restores ecological function of the creek. Forest Management Yes Fv- No -- Land Use Planning and Management Yes -d No -- Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Recharge Areas Protection r- Yes FV No -- Water-dependent Recreation r,/- Yes F No Project will provide visual access to Trout Creek. Watershed Management Yes F,/_ No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes F%o- No Project will provide 100-year flood protection. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 2000000 $$500,000 0 2500000 OR r- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $10,000 0 10000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes F%O- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 0 0 -- Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project None $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Cost share with $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Teichert e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Will be programmed in Town of Truckee annual will be financed for the 25-year planning operational and Capital Improvement Program period for project implementation (not grant budget. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual and previous similar projects planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes r,_1 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Culvert will be relined instead. the project is not funded. (300 words or less) 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and V Yes -- -- -- Evaluation � No N/A b. Final Design r Yes -- -- -- F r No N/A c. Environmental (-` Yes -- -- -- Documentation �— W No (CEQA/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting r Yes -- -- -- F_ ry No F_ N/A Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. Construction Yes -- -- -- Contracting r No N/A f. Construction Yes -- -- -- Implementation r No N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed -- project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The project will incorporate Low Impact Development design where possible.Also,vegetation that is removed as a part of construction can be salvaged and transplantedback into the final project. A new bridge would also allow room for bike paths and pedestrian connections to promote alternative transportation. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No rv- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes No Po N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No PO N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes r No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No W7 N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization City of South Lake Tahoe Name of Primary Contact Sarah Hussong Johnson Name of Secondary Contact Stan Hill Mailing Address 1052 Tata Lane, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail shussong-johnson@cityofslt.us Phone (###)###-#### 530.542.6034 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy, US Forest Service, Lahontan Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Regional Water Quality Control Board,Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, and California Department of Transportation Is your agency/organization Yes. The City is currently in construction of water quality committed to the project through improvements for the Bijou Area Erosion Control Project, Phase completion? If not, please explain 1. This project represents the next logical phase of the Project. II. General Project Information Project Title Bijou Area Erosion Control Project (Bijou Project) Project Category i' Restoration ►r Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The project includes water quality treatment for and replacement of a (Briefly describe the project, in 50 to 60 year old stormwater outfall discharging directly to Lake 300 words or less) Tahoe. The outfall is located within the densely developed Highway 50 commercial corridor, which discharges high pollutant load runoff directly to Lake Tahoe with no treatment. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 4 of 6 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes. This project is a part of the overall Bijou Area Erosion Control a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Project (EIP 01.01.01.02); a 6 phase water quality watershed project. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so The City is currently constructing the Bijou Area Erosion Control provide description. Project, Phase 1,which is a critical component to the City's TMDL compliance strategy. Political Support—List related The Bijou Project already has a TAC in place, which includes the MOUs, agreements or TACs stakeholders listed above. currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 38.946111 Longitude: -119.964444 Project Location Description The Bijou Project outfall is located along the south shore of Lake (e.g., along the south bank of Tahoe, in the eastern portion of the City of South Lake Tahoe. The Tahoe Sierra IRWM stream/river between river outfall is located just north of the Alta Mira Professional Building miles or miles from located at 3339 Lake Tahoe Boulevard. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Bijou Project is a key 55 acre standards in accordance with the r Yes component to the City's watershed attainment date, and participate in i— N/A strategy for compliance with stormwater the development of future TMDLs. the Lake Tahoe TMDL as the treatment. TMDL Project treats high pollutant credits have not load storm water discharged been calculated direct to Lake Tahoe. The for the project. Project will be registered into the Lake Clarity Crediting Program following implementation. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The Bijou Project will treat 55 acre implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater runoff watershed stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A discharged directly to Lake stormwater control/restoration to meet Water Tahoe at the "Don Cheepos" treatment. TMDL Quality Objectives (WQOs)for outfall. credits have not receiving water bodies established in been calculated the Basin Plan within the planning for the project horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year ly Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor K-7 Yes The Bijou Project will include 2 acre-foot of groundwater supply to assure future beneficial use of storm water water infiltrated reliability. F N/A for infiltration and recharge per design event. of groundwater. GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Fv N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water The Bijou Project will 55 acre bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes enhance Lake Tahoe water watershed associated uplands to support healthy r N/A quality through reduced stormwater watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife pollutant load discharge treatment. and plant habitats. directly to the lake. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Fv' Yes The Bijou Project will treat 55 acre caused by existing and new high pollutant load runoff to watershed development. r N/A Lake Tahoe from urban land stormwater development adjacent to the treatment. Lake. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The Project will involve 55 acre multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes collaboration between the watershed Region for information exchange. r N/A City and Caltrans, as the stormwater current outfall conveys water treatment. from both jurisdictions to Lake Tahoe. IWM3 - Increase public education and Through outreach efforts -- awareness of watershed functions, r Yes associated with the Project, protection and restoration needs to r N/A there will be an increased encourage stewardship by the public. pubic awareness of watershed restoration and water quality issues. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4- Promote activities that The Bijou Project will replace -- reduce flood risk. FV Yes the current outfall to Lake F- N/A Tahoe, which is undersized and has exceeded it's useful life expectancy. IWMS -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A The City of South Lake Tahoe is a Disadvantaged Community, based on Census 2010 data.The 2010 Census lists the State of California median income at$54,459. For El Dorado County,the 2010 median income is $52,550.The City of South Lake Tahoe median income is$24,261, or 46% of the El Dorado County income (which is close to the state average). Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A The Bijou Project will replace the climate change3. current outfall to Lake Tahoe, which is undersized and has exceeded it's useful life. Thereby, providing a valuable infastructure upgrade to accommodate increase storm events and runoff resulting from climate change. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes Fy-, No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency Fv- Yes F- No The Project provides for beneficial reuse of stormwater through infiltration and treatment of urban runoff;thereby, reinforcing efficiency codes and BMPs and increasing the use of recycled water. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local i— Yes I; No -- System Reoperation I— Yes Fv- No -- Water Transfers Yes FW No -- Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater P/ Yes F- No The Project provides for beneficial reuse of stormwater through infiltration and treatment of urban runoff;thereby, storing runoff to recharge groundwater. Desalination r Yes FV- No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes F%o No -- Recycled Municipal Water Yes F%o- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes FV- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes FV- No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes FV- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes Fy, No -- Pollution Prevention FV- Yes F- No The Project will reduce direct high pollutant load discharge to Lake Tahoe through water quality treatment and infiltration. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F%o- No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes F- No The Project will reduce direct high pollutant load discharge to Lake Tahoe from the highly urbanized commercial through water quality treatment and infiltration. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes FV- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F- Yes FV- No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration FV- Yes I— No The Project will reduce pollutant loading to Lake Tahoe from urban runoff, in an effort to promote restoration of the impaired water body. Forest Management r" Yes V No -- Land Use Planning and Management r" Yes rv- No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes 11 No -- Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water-dependent Recreation Fv Yes F_ No The Lake Tahoe economic vitality depends on lake clarity and water- dependent recreation.Treating runoff from the Bijou Project will help preserve Lake Tahoe's world renown color and clarity, which is vital to the region's recreation and economy. Watershed Management F_ Yes FV_ No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management Fv- Yes r No The Project will replace the current outfall to Lake Tahoe, which is undersized and has exceeded it's useful life. Thereby, providing a valuable infastructure upgrade to accommodate increase storm events and runoff volumes. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 500000 $$- 0 500000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $5,000/year 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P/ Yes i— No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 15000000 115000 Bijou outfall replacement and commercial core regional treatment system Phase 2 4000000 5000 Alta Mira outfall replacement and commercial core water quality treatment Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project California Tahoe $15,000,000 cost Conservancy, US Forest Service, Caltrans, Department of Water Resources, SWRCB Prop 84, TRPA mitigation funds d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding uncertain sources: $500,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. California Tahoe Conservancy, US Forest Service e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M maintenance costs will be funded through the will be financed for the 25-year planning City's General Fund period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Planning level estimates from the Bijou Area ECP planning, bid,etc.) Recommended Alternative Analysis g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes 15,70 No Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM h.Please describe what impact there may be if Current outfall remains in place with no water the project is not funded. (300 words or less) quality treatment on commercial core drainage from City right-of-way flowing directly to Lake Tahoe untreated 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes Conceptual planning for 4/1/2007 9/1/2008 Evaluation r No outfall replacement and water quality treatment r N/A was completed as part of the Bijou Area Erosion Control Plan Recommended Alternative development. b. Final Design r Yes tbd pending funding -- -- W No N/A c. Environmental !" Yes tbd pending funding -- -- Documentation Wo No (CECI,A/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting Yes tbd pending funding -- -- r W No N/A e. Construction r Yes tbd pending funding -- -- Contracting W No F_ N/A Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. Construction Yes tbd pending funding -- -- Implementation � No N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed TMDL, EIP project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Bijou Area Erosion Control Project feasibility of this project Recommended Alternative Memorandum c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The scientific basis for the Bijou research has been conducted) of the proposed project in Project is based on the Lake Tahoe 300 words or less. TMDL. The Lake Tahoe TMDL focuses on the reduction of Fine Sediment Particles (FSP)that reach Lake Tahoe. The Lake Tahoe TMDL estimates 2/3 of Fine Sediment Particles (FSP) loads originate in urban runoff.The bulk of FSP from urban runoff is generated by primary roads (Highway 50), secondary roads (City streets) and commercial/industrial land uses (the Highway 50 Commercial Core). The Bijou Project will reduce the amount of FSP currently discharge directly to Lake Tahoe by reconstructing the outfall and infiltrating contaminated storm water from the commercial corridor before it reaches Lake Tahoe. Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. I;_7 Yes F No r N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe beneficial reuse of stormwater through infiltration e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F,/_ N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No Fv N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No FV_ N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No FV_ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No W N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No FV_ N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No FV_ N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r Yes r No tv— N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization City of South Lake Tahoe Name of Primary Contact Sarah Hussong Johnson Name of Secondary Contact Stan Hill Mailing Address 1052 Tata Lane, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail shussong-johnson@cityofslt.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-542-6033 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes, if adequate funding is acquired, the project will be committed to the project through completed. completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Ruby Way- Overlook Court Project Category F Restoration v, Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Water quality and erosion control project that will address surface (Briefly describe the project, in runoff conditions. Existing site conditions include an undersized storm 300 words or less) drain collection and conveyance system that is overwhelmed during high intensity storm recurrences. Project work will include adding in additional storm drain inlets, adding subsurface storm drain pipes that will connect to an under- utilized rock-lined channel, and constructing a series of linear storm drain detention basins that will also allow infiltration of stormwater. Project improvements will redirect urban stormwater runoff into existing surface and subsurface conveyance systems; thereby, removing overland surface flow that is causing significant erosion. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 5 of 6 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to No a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related The City of South Lake Tahoe has been coordinating with the MOUs, agreements or TACs California Tahoe Conservancy to develop methods to control erosion currently in place. that affects CTC property that is located between an David Avenue and Ruby Way. Project Location: Latitude: 38.94250 Longitude: -119.94860 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description The easterly-central area bounded by Ski Run Boulevard on the west, (e.g., along the south bank of Pioneer Trail on the North,Wildwood Ave. (abandoned portion) on stream/river between river the east, and Lucinda Court on the south. miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Addressing and treating this Reduction of standards in accordance with the r Yes highly erosive area as major urban runoff peak attainment date, and participate in r N/A contributor of fine sediment flow rate will the development of future TMDLs. is a component to the City's reduce volume of strategy for compliance with annual erosion the Lake Tahoe TMDL. The "mass wasting" Project will be registered into by approximately the Lake Clarity Crediting 2 tons of Program following sediment. implementation. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The Project will allow The affected implementing measures such as r Yes restoration of upland slopes watershed area is stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A that are currently susceptible approximately 10 control/restoration to meet Water to erosive affects of urban acres of mixed Quality Objectives (WQOs)for runoff. Reducing erosion will urban and forest receiving water bodies established in contribute to the City's upland. the Basin Plan within the planning objective to remove fine horizon. sediment pollutants from entering Lake Tahoe. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality Post-construction monitoring The LCCP has monitoring programs through V Yes to confirm all improvements developed planning horizon, and coordinate N/A are functioning properly. The monitoring tools annually throughout the Region. project will also be registered that employ into the Lake Clarity Crediting Rapid Assessment Program (LCCP) which Methodologies includes extensive (RAM); monitoring requirements to specifically, the assure the constructed BMPs BMP RAM and are functioning according to the Road RAM. the projected sediment The RAM removal efficiencies derived monitoring from PLRM studies. results will be tracked through a database after each inspection. The inspection results correspond to a specific RAM score. Road RAM utilizes a rapid assessment of field conditions with the observed results entered into a database. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems V Yes continues to meet Federal and State N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Reducing upstream urban Tools within the wetlands, riparian and upland areas V Yes runoff will allow stabilization PLRM will allow to re-establish natural water filtering N/A and restoration of upland before and after processes. areas. evaluation of project effectiveness. Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water Reducing peak flow from the Upgrading bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes upstream urban watershed existing associated uplands to support healthy r N/A will allow restoration of stormwater watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife damaged forest upland area. collection and and plant habitats. conveyance system will remove approximately 5 cfs of urban runoff to be routed into an existing conveyance system. ER2 - Develop and implement Work will include site Pre and Post programs to prevent the spread of r Yes monitoring of invasive weed project invasive existing invasive species and r N/A species. weed species colonization of potential future monitoring will invasive species. be included with Project work. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Fv' Yes Remove damaging peak flow Approximately caused by existing and new that originates from 1000 linear feet development. r N/A upstream urban runoff. Peak of ephemeral flow rates and alteration of stream that is watershed conditions has impacted by an resulted in point discharge increase in conditions over upland forest historic runoff area that is owned and due to upstream maintained by the California development. Tahoe Conservancy. Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Upland forest area affected Create a project multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes by upstream originating TAC to develop Region for information exchange. r N/A urban runoff is property that consensus on is owned and managed by Project design the California Tahoe and effective Conservancy(CTC).The CTC deployment of and the City have established BMPs. a working relationship to address the needed Project improvements in the interest of protecting the property from stormwater runoff erosion damage which contribute to stormwater degradation. IWM3 - Increase public education and Public outreach to inform Conduct public awareness of watershed functions, r Yes citizens of proposed project meetings to share protection and restoration needs to r N/A work. project plans and encourage stewardship by the public. inform the public regarding the purpose of the project. IWM4- Promote activities that Reduce peak runoff that Construct reduce flood risk. F%0 Yes affects properties located stormwater F N/A along and below Ruby Way. collection and conveyance improvements that route stormwater into existing conveyance systems. Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Work will be halted if artifacts or considerations. bones are exhumed during construction and the Washoe Tribe will be contacted b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A The Project area consists of primarily working class citizens. d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Linear basin system and infiltration climate change3. opportunities in rock-lined channel will remove a portion of the urban runoff peak flow rate and volume discharged from the Project site. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Basin infiltration is intended to emissions (e.g.green technology). support and enhance vegetation that will absorb pollutants (phosphorous and nitrogen). More vigorous plant growth will counter greenhouse gas effects. Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes F%-o No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r" Yes rv- No -- System Reoperation r- Yes W No -- Water Transfers Yes ri No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F%70 Yes F- No The Project provides for beneficial reuse of stormwater through infiltration and treatment of urban runoff;thereby, storing runoff to recharge groundwater. Desalination r Yes F%-O No -- Precipitation Enhancement r" Yes F%-o No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes F%-o No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes F%-o No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes F%-O No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F%-O No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F%-o No -- Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Pollution Prevention Fv Yes F_ No The Project will reduce the incidence of upland erosion and degradation of stormwater. Salt and Salinity Management Yes rv- No -- Urban Runoff Management to Yes r- No Proposed improvements will mitigate the increase in peak runoff that is directed into undersized surface conveyances (both man made and natural forest upland streams). Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes F,/_ No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes F,/_ No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration Fv Yes r No The Project will reduce pollutant loading through a reduction in erosion within forest uplands. Forest Management Fv- Yes F_ No Proposed improvements will allow forest upland ephemeral streams to return to balanced condition. Land Use Planning and Management r" Yes r No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F%0_ No -- Water-dependent Recreation W Yes f" No The Lake Tahoe economic vitality depends on lake clarity and water- dependent recreation.Treating runoff from the Project will help preserve Lake Tahoe's world renown color and clarity, which is vital to the region's recreation and economy. Watershed Management FV_ Yes F_ No The project supports the City's Stormwater Master Plan. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management FV_ Yes F_ No Improvements will reduce the incidence of localized nuisance flooding during high intensity storm recurrences. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 150000 $$- 0 150000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $500 0 500 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes Fy-1 No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 0 0 -- Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M maintenance costs will be funded through the will be financed for the 25-year planning City's General Fund period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? W Yes r No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Not addressing existing runoff condition will result the project is not funded. (300 words or less) in a continued erosion of forest upland area located between David Lane and Ruby Way and continued nuisance flooding on properties located along and below Ruby Way. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r' Yes Field evaluation of 10/1/201 9/1/2014 Evaluation r rv- No project conditions, 1 evaluation of problem, r' N/A development of conceptual plan. b. Final Design r Yes TBD depending on -- -- r r' No funding r N/A c. Environmental r' Yes TBD depending on -- -- Documentation r. No funding (CEQA/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting r' Yes TBD depending on -- -- r r' No funding r N/A e. Construction r Yes TBD depending on -- -- Contracting r r. No funding r N/A f. Construction F Yes TBD depending on -- -- Implementation r r No funding r N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Lake Tahoe TMDL, Lake Tahoe EIP, project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General RWQCB, Lahontan, Basin Plan Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the The project is in the conceptual feasibility of this project planning stage; no technical reports have been generated to date. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The scientific basis for the Project is research has been conducted) of the proposed project in based on the Lake Tahoe TMDL. The 300 words or less. Lake Tahoe TMDL focuses on the reduction of Fine Sediment Particles (FSP) that reach Lake Tahoe. The Lake Tahoe TMDL estimates 2/3 of Fine Sediment Particles (FSP) loads originate in urban runoff. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. ,Y, Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Infiltration opportunities within linear treatment basins and routing stormwater into rock-lined channel conveyance system that will further promote stormwater infiltration. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes No rv- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes No v N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No W N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior No i Yes � N/A Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the r Yes F No 1 N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r Yes r- No P/ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization City of South Lake Tahoe Name of Primary Contact Sarah Hussong Johnson Name of Secondary Contact Sarah Hussong-Johnson Mailing Address 1052 Tata Lane, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail shussong-johnson@cityofslt.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-542-6033 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy, United States Forest Service Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Sierra Tract Erosion Control Project, Phase 3/4 Project Category r Restoration r Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The water quality improvements proposed for the project include (Briefly describe the project, in source control, hydrologic control, and treatment controls such as 300 words or less) parking deterrents, concrete curb and gutter, drainage inlets, sediment traps, storm drain piping, infiltration trenches,vegetated basins, infiltration basins and infiltration galleries.This project is being designed in close coordination with a Caltrans Water Quality Improvement Project that is located adjacent to the Sierra Tract Erosion Control Project, Phase 3 and 4 and shares multiple common stormwater facilities. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 of 6 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes. The Sierra Tract ECP, Phase 3/4 (Project) is located within the a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Lake Tahoe Basin and addresses the Lake Tahoe TMDL.The Project is EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so also registered with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) as EIP provide description. number 693. Previous project phases that were constructed include Phases la, 1b, and 2. Phase 3 and Phase 4 were combined to include the high priority areas, while removing the low priority areas, and renamed Phase 3/4. Political Support—List related The Project TAC was formed when the project planning was initiated MOUs, agreements or TACs in 2005.TAC members include from various regulatory, funding, and currently in place. EIP support agencies that include the following:TRPA, Regional Water Quality Control Board (Lahontan), United States Forest Service,Tahoe Resource Conservation District (TRCD), Liberty Energy, and South Tahoe Public Utility District. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location: Latitude: 38.55435 Longitude: -119.59091 Project Location Description The Project is located adjacent to U.S. Highway 50 between the Upper (e.g., along the south bank of Truckee River and Trout Creek.The Project watershed includes a small stream/river between river area north of U.S. Highway 50 and is bounded by Carson Avenue on miles or miles from the east, Lodi Avenue on the west, and Armstrong Avenue to the Towns/intersection and/or south. address): Project Template Page 2 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL Existing standards in accordance with the V Yes estimates that two-thirds of conditions attainment date, and participate in NSA the fine sediment particles hydrology the development of future TMDLs. (FSP) entering Lake Tahoe modeled using originates from urban runoff. the Pollutant Existing stormwater outfalls Load Reduction from the Project area to the Model (PLRM,the Upper Truckee River are preferred model some of the worst of the Lake Tahoe concentration level outfalls in TMDL) identify the Tahoe Basin (reference: approximately 53 TRPA snapshot day acre-feet per year monitoring). of stormwater runoff from the Project watershed; FSP suspended in the runoff is approximated at 23,200 pounds per year. The approximate pollutant load reduction is estimated by the PLRM at 13,000 pounds per year, corresponding to 65 Lake Clarity Credits and over a 3% reduction of the City's baseline load. Project Template Page 3 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Low impact development Approximately implementing measures such as r Yes (LID)treatment train deploys 600 linear feet stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A a series of water quality of perforated control/restoration to meet Water treatments that work roadside shoulder Quality Objectives (WQOs)for together to remove drainage galleries receiving water bodies established in pollutants from stormwater. with sediment the Basin Plan within the planning Roadside shoulder vegetation traps that will horizon. restoration, roadside provide fine shoulder protection, sediment stormwater infiltration collection and galleries and bio-retention storage, three basins. water quality treatment basins, two infiltration galleries, storm drain collection & conveyance system, over 15,000 linear feet of curb shoulder protection and protective bollards WQ3 - Implement water quality Post-construction monitoring The LCCP has monitoring programs through r Yes to confirm all improvements developed planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A are functioning properly.The monitoring tools annually throughout the Region. project will also be registered that employ into the Lake Clarity Crediting Rapid Assessment Program (LCCP)which Methodologies includes extensive (RAM); monitoring requirements to specifically,the assure the constructed BMPs BMP RAM and are functioning according to the Road RAM. the projected sediment The RAM removal efficiencies derived monitoring from the PLRM studies. results will be tracked through a database after each inspection. The inspection Project Template Page 4 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) results correspond to a specific RAM score. Road RAM utilizes a rapid assessment of field conditions with the observed results entered into a database. A corresponding RAM score will be calculated to assist with prioritizing roadway street sweeping schedules. By utilizing post construction monitoring as well as the RAM inspections associated with the LCCP, the City will be able to measure and document the water quality benefits of the project. The City will register the Sierra Tract, Phases3/4 project for the period of 20 years.The effectiveness of the project will Project Template Page 5 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) not only be monitored throughout the lifetime of the grant, but for the full 20 year registration period. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State I% N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, LID improvements include a LID wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes "treatment train" of improvements to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A stormwater infiltration that promote processes. opportunities. infiltration of stormwater include three treatment basins, approximately 600 linear feet of perforated roadside infiltration pipes, 400 feet of perforated storm drain main, and two infiltration galleries. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A Project Template Page 6 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Restore vegetation along Construct over bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes roadside shoulders (Uplands) 15,000 linear feet associated uplands to support healthy r N/A and enhance water quality of concrete watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife before discharging into the roadside shoulder and plant habitats. Upper Truckee River. protection curb & gutter. Install roadside shoulder protective bollards. Construct treatment basins and infiltration galleries to remove fine sediment pollutants. Project Template Page 7 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement Work includes site Pre-project programs to prevent the spread of r Yes monitoring of invasive weed invasive weed existing invasive species and r N/A species. monitoring has colonization of potential future occurred and will invasive species. be followed up during and after construction to eradicate invasive weed species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes Reduce fine and coarse Infiltration in caused by existing and new sediment transport and basins, development. F N/A reduce stormwater peak perforated pipe, discharge rates. and infiltration galleries will reduce the peak discharge flow rates into the Upper Truckee River. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Members of the Project TAC TAC meetings, multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes are also members of TAC Stormwater Region for information exchange. r N/A within other jurisdictions (El Quality Dorado County, Placer Improvement County, Conservation Committee Districts, and utility districts). meetings Successful methods and LIDS incorporated into other projects are shared with jurisdictions within the Tahoe Basin Project Template Page 8 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and Public outreach to inform Conduct public awareness of watershed functions, r Yes citizens of proposed project meetings to share protection and restoration needs to r N/A work. project plans and encourage stewardship by the public. inform the public regarding the purpose of the project. IWM4- Promote activities that Reduce peak runoff flow Reduction of reduce flood risk. F%0 Yes rates within the Project area impervious r N/A of which flow into the Upper surface area and Truckee River. stormwater basins and infiltration galleries with storage volume. Total volume of annual runoff is estimated to be 8%. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Uses LID methods to remove Three water water quality,water supply, r Yes pollutants from stormwater treatment basins, groundwater recharge,flood r N/A runoff and provide surface roadside management) in local and regional water infiltration infiltration planning efforts and support efforts opportunities. Basins and galleries, and two to continue improving the science. infiltration galleries reduces infiltration gallery peak runoff rate into the facilities. Upper Truckee River. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 9 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Work will be halted if artifacts or considerations. bones are exhumed during construction and the Washoe Tribe will be contacted. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A The Project area consists of primarily working class citizens. d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Project improvements provide climate change3. significant infiltration opportunities that will enhance opportunities for groundwater recharge. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Basin infiltration is intended to emissions (e.g.green technology). support and enhance vegetation that will absorb pollutants (phosphorous and nitrogen). More vigorous plant growth will counter greenhouse gas effects. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are We N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency )— Yes Fv- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes F,/- No -- Project Template Page 10 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes F%O- No -- System Reoperation r Yes F%-O No -- Water Transfers F- Yes Fv- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F%o Yes r No The Project provides for beneficial reuse of stormwater through infiltration and treatment of urban runoff;thereby, storing runoff to recharge groundwater. Desalination r" Yes W No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes Io No -- Recycled Municipal Water Yes F,/- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes r No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes r No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation Yes rv- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r" Yes 1- No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes F- No The Project will reduce direct high pollutant load discharge to the Upper Truckee River through water quality treatment and infiltration. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F%O- No -- Urban Runoff Management FV- Yes F- No Multiple storage and infiltration opportunities that will allow treatment of stormwater before discharge into the Upper Truckee River. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes FV- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes P No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration 1- Yes F- No The Project will reduce pollutant loading to the Upper Truckee River from urban runoff, in an effort to promote restoration of the impaired water body. Forest Management r" Yes W No -- Land Use Planning and Management r" Yes P No -- Recharge Areas Protection r" Yes rv- No -- Project Template Page 11 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water-dependent Recreation V Yes No The Lake Tahoe economic vitality depends on lake clarity and water- dependent recreation. Treating runoff from the Sierra Tract ECP, Phase 3/4 will help preserve the Upper Truckee River and ultimately, Lake Tahoe's world renown color and clarity, which is vital to the region's recreation and economy. Watershed Management -d Yes r No The project is consistent with the City's Stormwater Management Master Plan. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management I Yes No The Project includes construction roadside infiltration facilities, treatment/infiltration basins, and infiltration galleries. Thereby, providing a significant infiltration opportunities to reduce peak runoff rates and runoff volumes. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 12 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 350000 $$3,351,500 211000 3912500 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $5,000 0 5000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? r- Yes I;_7 No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 0 0 -- Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project CTCUSFS $1,330,805 cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Proposition 84CTC $3,022,164 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Maintenance responsibilities will be carried out by will be financed for the 25-year planning the City's Street Maintenance Division using period for project implementation (not grant General Fund budget allocations. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Planning costs were negotiated with Consultant planning, bid, etc.) and approved by the funding agencies. Construction costs are estimated values based on recent Tahoe Basin bid results. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? %0 Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Sierra Tract ECP, Phase 3/4 water quality the project is not funded. (300 words or less) improvements are expected to reduce Fine Sediment Particle pollutants by 3%within the City of South Lake Tahoe,which equates to 30%of the City's 2016 MS4 permit requirements. Project plans and permitting are nearly complete; no other City of SLT EIP project is close to being ready to bid. Therefore, Sierra Tract ECP, Phase 3/4 is positioned to provide significant reduction in pollutant production and contribute to the City's MS4 permit requirements for pollutant load reduction. Not Project Template Page 13 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM constructing the Project will result in the City not meeting the 2016 MS4 required pollutant discharge reduction requirements. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Fv Yes Completed Existing 5/1/2007 8/1/2012 Evaluation F_ F_ No Conditions and Evaluation F_ N/A Memorandum, Alternatives Analysis, and Alternatives Formulation and Evaluation Memorandum. b. Final Design F_ Yes Completed 30%, 75%, 8/1/2012 2/1/2012 P/ W No and submitted draft 90% project plans.The 90% F_ N/A draft submittal is currently being updated to a complete 90% design stage. c. Environmental F_ Yes CEQA Mitigated Negative 8/1/2010 3/1/2014 Documentation F%O- W No Declaration is complete. (CEQA/NEPA) The NEPA is nearly F_ N/A complete. d. Permitting F_ Yes Regulatory agencies are 5/1/2014 12/1/2014 F- W No represented within the Project TAC.The TRPA F_ N/A construction permit and Lahontan construction discharge permit will be sought after the plans are at the complete 90% or Final design stage. Project Template Page 14 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. Construction r Yes TBD depending on -- -- Contracting F- P/ No funding F N/A f. Construction F- Yes TBD depending on -- -- Implementation F- P/ No funding F- N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is Final Design and Environmental Documentation are being pursued checked as current status simultaneously; both are nearly complete (completion estimated to occur by the end of February, 2014). Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Lake Tahoe TMDLLake Tahoe Clarity project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. Crediting Program RWQCB, Lahontan, General Plans, UWMPs,GWMPs, Water Master Basin Plan Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Existing Conditions Analysis feasibility of this project Memorandum.Alternatives Formulation and Evaluation Memorandum. Recommended Alternative Project Report. CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Geotechnical Study. Heritage Resources Determination. Biological Evaluation/Biological Assessment including:. Wetlands Delineation. Invasive Plant Risk Assessment.Threatened and Engangered Species Survey.Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Initial Environmental Checklist. Utility conflict survey. Pipeline condition assessment. Pollutant Load Reduction Assessment. Hydrologic/Hydraulic Assessment.Topographic Survey. Property Boundary Survey. Baseline Photo Monitoring Project Template Page 15 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how An extensive amount of research and much research has been conducted)of the proposed analysis has been conducted to evaluate project in 300 words or less. the need for the project and to characterize problem areas, opportunities and constraints.The project was initially identified through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency's Environmental Improvement Program (EIP#693).An Existing Conditions Analysis resulted in the division of the overall project area into five separate phases. Further analysis and prioritization of the project area was conducted based on the risk of stormwater impacts to nearby receiving waters.The Pollutant Load Reduction Model, an implementation tool developed for the Lake Tahoe TMDL for clarity,was employed to evaluate the pollutant sources and risk potential, and resulted in the definition of the current Phase 3 &4 project area. Based on the modeling results and extensive field surveys, the Phase 3 &4 project area is considered the highest priority area, within the overall Sierra Tract Subdivision,for water quality based on its dense development, high traffic, lack of drainage and water quality improvements and its proximity to highly sensitive wetlands and surface waters (Upper Truckee River).This river is a major tributary to Lake Tahoe and efficiently transports sediment and other pollutants in stormwater discharges from the project area to Lake Tahoe.The overall goal of the Sierra Tract project is to reduce pollutant loads, specifically fine sediment, to these receiving waters while working within a highly space constrained area.The studies and analyses listed under Item B above were conducted in coordination with a project technical advisory committee (TAC) and a stakeholder based decision making Project Template Page 16 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM framework was utilized to conduct a project alternatives evaluation and to develop a strong consensus on the preferred project alternative. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F%-O Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Project improvements include several different types of stormwater infiltration opportunities. LID techniques include three stormwater treatment basins that provide surface storage, nutrient uptake, evaporation, and infiltration of stormwater. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water F Yes F No P/ N/A Management Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No Fv N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter F Yes F No FV_ N/A requirements(CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is F Yes F No FV_ N/A "no", do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP r Yes F No W N/A (due 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP F Yes F No W7 N/A prior to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for F Yes F No FV_ N/A the subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year F Yes F No FV_ N/A of the grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 17 of 17 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization City of South Lake Tahoe Name of Primary Contact Sarah Hussong Johnson Name of Secondary Contact Stan Hill Mailing Address 1052 Tata Lane, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail shussong-johnson@cityofslt.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-542-6033 Other Cooperating Caltrans, California Tahoe Conservancy, United States Forest Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Service Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Sierra Boulevard Project Category F Restoration v, Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The Sierra Boulevard Project addresses multiple classifications that (Briefly describe the project, in include an important water quality (EIP) component. As a complete 300 words or less) streets project, the City of South Lake Tahoe projet will address stormwater quality issues while providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The project area along Sierra Boulevard currently drains to the Upper Truckee River and is lined by unimproved and unprotected roadway shoulders that are frequently used by pedestrians and cyclists. Roadside shoulders consist of compacted soils that are tracked onto the pavement surface, ground into fine powder and suspended in stormwater runoff. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 of 6 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes- Project helps achieve TMDL reduction goals and EIP projects a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, 01.01.01.09 and 03.01.02.04 EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related Caltrans Cooperative Agreement (Sierra Blvd. intersection). Sierra MOUs, agreements or TACs Tract ECP, Phase 3/4 TAC currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 38.92210 Longitude: -119.98260 Project Location Description The Sierra Boulevard Project is located on Sierra Boulevard between (e.g., along the south bank of U.S. Highway 50 and Barbara Avenue. stream/river between river Tahoe Sierra IRWM miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL Existing standards in accordance with the r Yes estimates that two-thirds of conditions attainment date, and participate in r N/A the fine sediment particles hydrology the development of future TMDLs. (FSP) entering Lake Tahoe modeled using originates from urban runoff. the Pollutant Existing stormwater outfalls Load Reduction from the Project area to the Model (PLRM,the Upper Truckee River are preferred model some of the worst of the Lake Tahoe concentration level outfalls in TMDL) the Tahoe Basin (reference: TRPA snapshot day monitoring). WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Project work includes Over 3,000 feet implementing measures such as r Yes reducing pavement area of roadway stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A where possible, roadside (approximately control/restoration to meet Water shoulder restoration, and 6,000 feet of Quality Objectives (WQOs)for water treatment and roadside receiving water bodies established in infiltration basins. shoulder)will be the Basin Plan within the planning protected from horizon. vehicle disturbance by either revegetation or protected parking surface. Project Template Page 2 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality Post-construction monitoring The LCCP has monitoring programs through r Yes to confirm all improvements developed planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A are functioning properly.The monitoring tools annually throughout the Region. project will also be registered that employ into the Lake Clarity Crediting Rapid Assessment Program (LCCP)which Methodologies includes extensive (RAM).The RAM monitoring requirements to monitoring assure the constructed BMPs results will be are functioning according to tracked through a the projected sediment database after removal efficiencies derived each inspection. from the PLRM studies. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. F%' N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement Work includes site Pre-project programs to prevent the spread of r Yes monitoring of invasive weed invasive weed existing invasive species and r N/A species. monitoring will colonization of potential future occur and will be invasive species. followed up during and after construction to eradicate invasive weed species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. Project Template Page 4 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes Reduce fine and coarse Infiltration in caused by existing and new sediment transport and basins will reduce development. F N/A reduce stormwater peak the peak discharge rates. discharge flow rates into the Upper Truckee River. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Members of the Project TAC TAC meetings, multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes are also members of TAC Stormwater Region for information exchange. r N/A within other jurisdictions (El Quality Dorado County, Placer Improvement County, Conservation Committee Districts, and utility districts). meetings Successful methods and LIDs incorporated into other projects are shared with jurisdictions within the Tahoe Basin IWM3 - Increase public education and Public outreach to inform Conduct public awareness of watershed functions, r Yes citizens of proposed project meetings to share protection and restoration needs to r N/A work. project plans and encourage stewardship by the public. inform the public regarding the purpose of the project. Project Template Page 5 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4- Promote activities that Reduce peak runoff flow Reduction of reduce flood risk. FV Yes rates within the Project area impervious F N/A of which flow into the Upper surface area and Truckee River. providing approximately 4,000 cubic feet of storage within stormwater treatment and infiltration basins located within medians between travel lanes. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Groundwater recharge Treatment/infiltr water quality,water supply, r Yes (although relatively minor) ation basins will groundwater recharge,flood r N/A will be provided within be located in the management) in local and regional stormwater street medians planning efforts and support efforts treatment/infiltration basins between each to continue improving the science. block (12 shallow basins). IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Work will be halted if artifacts or considerations. bones are exhumed during construction and the Washoe Tribe will be contacted. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A The Project area consists of primarily working class citizens. d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Relative to the size of the Project, the climate change3. proposed improvements provide significant infiltration opportunities that will enhance groundwater surcharge. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Basin infiltration is intended to emissions (e.g.green technology). support and enhance vegetation that will absorb pollutants (phosphorous and nitrogen). More vigorous plant growth will counter greenhouse gas effects. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are W N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F,/- No -- Project Template Page 7 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Urban Water Use Efficiency r" Yes FV_ No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F_ Yes F%O_ No -- System Reoperation F_ Yes Fv- No -- Water Transfers F_ Yes Fv- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes r No Treatment of pollution, infiltration, and beneficial reuse. Desalination r- Yes r No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes F_ No Improved infiltration. Recycled Municipal Water r Yes rv- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes FV_ No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes P No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r" Yes W No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes FV_ No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes F_ No Stormwater treatment. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes Fv- No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes F_ No Treatment and infiltration through low impact development and best management practices. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship i— Yes F%o- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes FV_ No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r" Yes r No -- Forest Management r- Yes W No -- Land Use Planning and Management rY, Yes r- No Multi-component, stormwater treatment,transportation, bicycle, pedestrian, and economic development project. Recharge Areas Protection r- Yes P No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes F_ No Improved water quality for Upper Truckee River and Lake Tahoe. Region is heavily dependent on recreation attraction. Project Template Page 8 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Watershed Management V Yes No Stormwater management through treatment and infiltration opportunities. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management FV_ Yes F_ No Peak flow attenuation and infiltration. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non-State Cost Share: Total Cost Grant Fund Source Other Amount (Local/Federal Funding State Fund Match) Source 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 750000 $$1,000,000 750000 2500000 OR F DAC 2. Annual Operations and $4,000 0 4000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? r Yes k-o' No 1. If so provide cost Project O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Cost Phase 1 0 0 -- Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project City of South Lake Tahoe- $210,000 cost Caltrans Settlement d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding CMAQ-ProbableRSTP- $1,750,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Probable e.Explain how operation and maintenance Maintenance responsibilities will be carried out by costs will be financed for the 25-year the City's Street Maintenance Division using General planning period for project implementation Fund budget allocations. (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Conceptual Plan Estimate planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes v No h.Please describe what impact there may be if If the project goes unfunded, citizens will continue the project is not funded. (300 words or to walk on the roadway without sidewalks, cyclists less) will not have bike lanes, and highly erosive shoulders will continue to impact water quality in the Upper Truckee River and, ultimately, Lake Tahoe. This combination of undesirable conditions will also serve to further repress economic growth and opportunity in the surrounding area. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F%O- Yes The Sierra Boulevard 7/1/2008 12/1/2014 Evaluation r F_ No Project was originally part of Sierra Tract ECP, r N/A Phase 4. Most of Phase 4 was combined with Sierra Tract ECP, Phase 3/4. Sierra Boulevard improvements include the remaining high priority portion of Phase 4 that was not included in Phase 3/4.Work completed with the Phase 4 design effort included an Existing Conditions Analysis Memorandum (ECAM) and preliminary work with an Alternatives Analysis. b. Final Design r Yes TBD pending funding -- -- r No N/A c. Environmental r Yes TBD pending funding -- -- Documentation �` No (CECI.A/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting r Yes TBD pending funding -- -- No N/A e. Construction r` Yes TBD pending funding -- -- Contracting r r` No r N/A Project Template Page 11 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. Construction F Yes TBD pending funding -- -- Implementation F F No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 12 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Lake Tahoe TMDLRWQCB, Lahontan, project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Basin PlanTahoe Basin Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Environmental Improvement Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Program (EIP). b. List technical reports and studies supporting the • Existing Conditions Analysis feasibility of this project Memorandum• Alternatives Formulation and Evaluation Memorandum c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The scientific basis for the Sierra research has been conducted) of the proposed project in Boulevard Project is based on the 300 words or less. Lake Tahoe TMDL.The Lake Tahoe TMDL focuses on the reduction of Fine Sediment Particles (FSP) that reach Lake Tahoe. The Lake Tahoe TMDL estimates 2/3 of Fine Sediment Particles (FSP) loads originate in urban runoff. The bulk of FSP from urban runoff is generated by primary roads (Highway 50), secondary roads (City streets) and commercial/industrial land uses (the Highway 50 Commercial Core). The Bijou Project will reduce the amount of FSP currently discharge directly to Lake Tahoe by reconstructing the outfall and infiltrating contaminated storm water from the commercial corridor before it reaches Lake Tahoe. Further analysis and prioritization of the project area was conducted based on the risk of stormwater impacts to nearby receiving waters. The Pollutant Load Reduction Model, an implementation tool developed for the Lake Tahoe TMDL for clarity, was employed to evaluate the pollutant sources and risk potential. Project Template Page 13 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. I;_7 Yes F No r N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Water quality treatment basins will provide infiltration opportunities and nutrient uptake. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No FV_ N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No FV_ N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No ry N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes r No P/ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No FV_ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No FV_ N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No F%O N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r Yes F No P/ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 14 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization City of South Lake Tahoe Name of Primary Contact Sarah Hussong Johnson Name of Secondary Contact Stan Hill Mailing Address 1052 Tata Lane, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail shussong-johnson@cityofslt.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-542-6034 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy, Lahontan Regional Water Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Quality Control Board,Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Is your agency/organization Yes. As an integral component of the City's stormwater committed to the project through management program and pollutant load reduction strategy, completion? If not, please explain the City has continued to implement roadway management and maintenance practices to both reduce the volume of roadway abrasives used during t II. General Project Information Project Title South Lake Tahoe Integrated Roadway Management Strategy Project Category r— Restoration :;-o' Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The proposed project includes includes two mobile BMP strategies (Briefly describe the project, in through the purchase of two high efficiency sweepers and an 300 words or less) automated spreader to reduce the use of roadway abrasives; the project also includes the construction of a sweeper cleanout facility and a brine mixing facility for roadway de-icing fluids to further reduce the use of sediment generating roadway abrasives. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 6 of 6 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes, the proposed project supports the City's pollutant load reduction a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, strategy in accordance with the TMDL. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related Yes, a TAC is in place with regional partners that support mobile BMPs MOUs, agreements or TACs and improved roadway operations. currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 38.90613 Longitude: -120.01174 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description The sweepers, advanced sander, and brine application would be used (e.g., along the south bank of throughout the City of South Lake Tahoe on 258 lane miles of stream/river between river roadway that generate both water and airborne pollution that impact miles or miles from Lake Tahoe.The sweeper cleanout and brine mixing facilities would Towns/intersection and/or be constructed at the City's maintenance facility on D Street. address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The strategy is a critical to Treatment of 258 standards in accordance with the r Yes the City's compliance with lane miles of attainment date, and participate in r N/A the Lake Tahoe TMDL to roadway within the development of future TMDLs. reduce fine sediment and the 5,500 acres of nutrients originating from South Lake urban streets. Tahoe. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The project will improve the Treatment of 258 implementing measures such as r Yes quality of urban runoff that lane miles of stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A impact the tributaries of Lake roadway within control/restoration to meet Water Tahoe and the Lake itself. the 5,500 acres of Quality Objectives (WQOs)for South Lake receiving water bodies established in Tahoe. the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality The project will quantify the Volume of monitoring programs through r Yes volume of material reclaimed material and planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A from the streets and the debris collected; annually throughout the Region. reduction in abrasives used. 30%to 50% reduction of abrasives used. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State W N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year ly Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. F%, N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Street maintenance activities Exposure to the protection activities for high quality r Yes are highly visible to the City's 21,000 groundwater, and advocate for r N/A public and raise awareness of residents. Annual improvements to impacted the connection between snow removal groundwater quality through public clean roadways, stabilized notice to City education. shoulders, BMPs, and the residents provide environment. information and statistics. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water The proposed strategy and Improved bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes practices will enhance Lake practices within associated uplands to support healthy r N/A Tahoe clarity and it's 5,500 acre urban watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife tributaries through reduced area. and plant habitats. pollutant loading. ER2 - Develop and implement Improved sweeping practices Maintenance on programs to prevent the spread of r Yes capture invasive plant seeds 258 lane miles of existing invasive species and r N/A transported into the basin via roadways. colonization of potential future vehicles. invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Fv, Yes Ongoing maintenance 258 lane miles caused by existing and new practices on the City's treated, 5,500 development. r N/A roadway are critical to acres within City minimize pollutant loading. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Mobile BMPs and enhanced Volume of multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes sanding practices are material Region for information exchange. r N/A emerging as critical strategies captured, before within the Tahoe Basin to and after road meet pollutant load RAM scores, reduction goals. reduced abrasives Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and Street maintenance activities Exposure to the awareness of watershed functions, r Yes are highly visible to the City's 21,000 protection and restoration needs to r N/A public and raise awareness of residents. encourage stewardship by the public. the connection between clean roadways, stabilized shoulders, BMPs, and the environment. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes F%0 N/A IWMS -Address climate change (e.g. New sweepers are both more Current California water quality,water supply, r Yes fuel efficient (reducing GHG Air Quality groundwater recharge,flood r N/A emissions) and better Control Board management) in local and regional capture pollutants to protect diesel emissions planning efforts and support efforts water quality. regulations. to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A The City of South Lake Tahoe is a Disadvantaged Community, based on Census 2010 data.The 2010 Census lists the State of California median income at$54,459. For El Dorado County,the 2010 median income is $52,550.The City of South Lake Tahoe median income is$24,261, or 46% of the El Dorado County income (which is close to the state average). c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Advanced sanding and the availability climate change3. of brine assist in the response to the increasingly variable storms experienced in the Sierras as a result of climate change. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A New sweepers are fuel efficient to emissions (e.g.green technology). reduce GHG emissions. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F,/- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency 'd Yes F- No High efficiency sweepers minimize the amount of water used in urban street maintenance applications. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes Fv- No -- System Reoperation I— Yes I;-W No -- Water Transfers I— Yes I;-W No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes I— No Project reduces pollution levels in urban runoff, protecting groundwater supplies. Desalination r Yes Fv- No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes F%o No -- Recycled Municipal Water Yes F%o- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F- Yes I;-W No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes Id No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes Fv- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F%o No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes F No Project reduces pollution levels in urban runoff, protecting groundwater supplies. Salt and Salinity Management Yes F%o- No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes F- No Project reduces pollution levels in urban runoff, protecting groundwater supplies. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship Yes tv— No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes Fv- No -- Water Pricing) Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Ecosystem Restoration Fv Yes F_ No The Project will reduce pollutant loading to Lake Tahoe from urban runoff, in an effort to promote restoration of the impaired water body. Forest Management r Yes F%-o No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes Fy-, No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F%_0 No -- Water-dependent Recreation rV Yes 1— No The Lake Tahoe economic vitality depends on lake clarity and water- dependent recreation. Treating runoff from the Bijou Project will help preserve Lake Tahoe's world renown color and clarity, which is vital to the region's recreation and economy. Watershed Management r Yes F_ No Project components incorporate best management practices across the 5,500 acres within City limits. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes F%_0 No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1145500 $$- 0 1145500 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $172,500 0 172500 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes Fy-1 No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 0 0 -- Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Uncertain Mobile $532,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. BMP Sources:TRPA, CTC e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M Costs are included within the City's annual will be financed for the 25-year planning budget for roadway maintenance and stormwater period for project implementation (not grant management from the City's General Fund. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Planning- based on recent bid prices and O&M planning, bid,etc.) Costs g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? W Yes r No h.Please describe what impact there may be if A failure to fund the project could jeopardize the the project is not funded. (300 words or less) City's pollutant load reduction strategy. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and W Yes Mobile BMPs (sweepers) -- -- Evaluation r r No and satelite based advanced sanding F N/A practices have been succesfully implemented by other entities in the Tahoe area; sweeper washout design must be completed. b. Final Design F_ Yes Brine facility has been -- -- W No designed and mixing tank secured. Other F_ N/A components are not finalized. c. Environmental F_ Yes tbd pending funding -- -- Documentation r W No (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F_ Yes tbd pending funding -- -- r F%O- No F_ N/A e. Construction r Yes tbd pending funding -- -- Contracting r W No r` N/A f. Construction !" Yes tbd pending funding -- -- Implementation r W No r` N/A Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is Components of the Integrated Roadway Manangement effort have checked as current status been designed or secured, but other components are on hold pending funding. Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed TMDL, PLRM, EIP project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the "Lake Tahoe TMDL Pollutant feasibility of this project Reduction Opportunity Report" Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board and Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, 2008.TRPA BMP Handbook, "4.2-b Street Sweeping" 2012"Effectiveness of Street Sweeping in Inclinde Village, NV" Nevada Tahoe Conservation District, 2011."Evaluation of Epoke Bulk Spreader for Winter Maintenance." The Ohio Department of Transportation, Office of Statewide Planning& Research, 2013. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The scientific basis for the Bijou research has been conducted)of the proposed project in Project is based on the Lake Tahoe 300 words or less. TMDL.The Lake Tahoe TMDL focuses on the reduction of Fine Sediment Particles (FSP)that reach Lake Tahoe. The Lake Tahoe TMDL estimates 2/3 of Fine Sediment Particles (FSP) loads originate in urban runoff.The bulk of FSP from urban runoff is generated by primary roads (Highway SO), secondary roads (City streets) and commercial/industrial land uses. Research also indicates that a large portion of airborne pollution settling in the waters of Lake Tahoe is from urban roadways. Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F,/_ N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No P/ N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements r Yes No N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No d N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No W N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No FV_ N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of F Yes F No FV_ N/A the grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization City of South Lake Tahoe Name of Primary Contact Sarah Hussong Johnson Name of Secondary Contact Stan Hill Mailing Address 1052 Tata Lane, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail shussong-johnson@cityofslt.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-542-6034 Other Cooperating US Forest Service, California Tahoe Conservancy, Lahontan Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Regional Water Quality Control Board Is your agency/organization Yes. The City has initiated the Stormwater Quality committed to the project through Improvement Committee (SWQIC) planning process for the completion? If not, please explain Tahoe Valley Project and has received initial funding for project design. The Project is considered an important aspect of the City's compliance st II. General Project Information Project Title Tahoe Valley Stormwater Improvement Project (SWIP) Project Category r— Restoration :;-o' Storm Water/Flood Control Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Tahoe Valley SWIP (Project) is a water quality treatment project (Briefly describe the project, in designed to maximize reduction of pollutant loads discharged to the 300 words or less) Upper Truckee River from urban stormwater runoff in the commercial area along Highway 50 in the western portion of the City of South Lake Tahoe, California. Pollutant loading estimates submitted to the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board, as part of the City's TMDL compliance strategy, indicate high fine sediment particle (FSP) loads and surface runoff originate from the Tahoe Valley Project area and discharge directly to the Upper Truckee River, a direct tributary to Lake Tahoe. The Project proposes to reduce pollutant loads by designing and constructing new stormwater improvements (infiltration basins) and by modifying existing stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure from erosion control projects constructed from the 1980's through the early 1990's,to maximize removal of FSP in stormwater. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 6 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes. This project is EIP no. 01.01.01.12 and is a critical component to a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, the City's TMDL compliance strategy. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Political Support—List related No formal TAC established, but supported by the US Forest Service MOUs, agreements or TACs and California Tahoe Conservancy(funding partners) and the currently in place. Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board. Project Location: Latitude: 34.54000 Longitude: -120.00000 Project Location Description The Tahoe Valley Project is located in the commercial area along (e.g., along the south bank of Highway 50 in the vicinity of the Highway 50/Lake Tahoe Boulevard stream/river between river intersection in South Lake Tahoe. This area is commonly referred to miles or miles from as the "Y". Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Tahoe Valley Project is a 380 acre standards in accordance with the r Yes key component to the City's watershed of attainment date, and participate in r N/A strategy for compliance with stormwater the development of future TMDLs. the Lake Tahoe TMDL as the treatment. TMDL Project treats high pollutant modeled load storm water discharged pollutant load directly to the Upper Truckee removal of River,the largest tributary to 16,400 Ibs of Lake Tahoe. The Project will FSP/year,which be registered into the Lake represents Clarity Crediting Program approx. 4%of the following implementation. City's baseline pollutant load. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The Tahoe Valley Project will 380 acre implementing measures such as r Yes treat urban stormwater watershed of stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A runoff discharged directly to stormwater control/restoration to meet Water the Upper Truckee River,the treatment. TMDL Quality Objectives (WQOs)for main tributary to Lake Tahoe. modeled receiving water bodies established in pollutant load the Basin Plan within the planning removal of horizon. 16,400 Ibs of FSP/year,which represents approx. 4%of the City's baseline pollutant load. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor FV Yes The Tahoe Valley Project will 23 acre-foot groundwater supply to assure future include beneficial use of reduction of reliability. F N/A storm water for infiltration stormwater and recharge of discharge per groundwater. year. GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The Tahoe Valley Project will 380 acre bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes enhance Lake Tahoe water watershed associated uplands to support healthy r N/A quality through reduced stormwater watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife pollutant load discharge to treatment. and plant habitats. the Upper Truckee River,the largest tributary to Lake Tahoe. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes The Tahoe Valley Project will 380 acre caused by existing and new treat high pollutant load watershed development. i— N/A runoff from urban land stormwater development currently treatment. discharging to the Upper Truckee River,the largest tributary to Lake Tahoe. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The Project will involve 380 acre multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes collaboration between the watershed Region for information exchange. r N/A City other public land holders stormwater (California Tahoe treatment. Conservancy and US Forest Service)for use of public lands in the Project area for water quality treatment. IWM3 - Increase public education and Through outreach efforts -- awareness of watershed functions, r Yes associated with the Project, protection and restoration needs to r N/A there will be an increased encourage stewardship by the public. pubic awareness of watershed restoration and water quality issues. IWM4- Promote activities that The Project will reduce flood estimated reduce flood risk. W Yes risk via infiltration/storage of 102,500 cubic F_ N/A stormwater runoff. feet of stormwater storage/infiltratio n on annual basis. IWMS -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM6 - Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in Yes order to improve coordination with v N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A The City of South Lake Tahoe is a Disadvantaged Community, based on Census 2010 data.The 2010 Census lists the State of California median income at$54,459. For El Dorado County,the 2010 median income is $52,550.The City of South Lake Tahoe median income is $24,261, or 46% of the El Dorado County income (which is close to the state average). c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A The Tahoe Valley Project will provide climate change3. stormwater runoff infiltration/storage and reduce peak flows in the watershed, beneficial to both flooding and drought conditions resulting from climate change. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas i;r N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are , N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand IL Agricultural Water Use Efficiency ry Yes F%O No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes r No The Project provides for beneficial reuse of stormwater through infiltration and treatment of urban runoff;thereby, reinforcing efficiency codes and BMPs and increasing the use of recycled water. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local r" Yes F%O- No -- System Reoperation r Yes Fy-, No -- Water Transfers r Yes F%-o No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater W Yes F- No The Project provides for beneficial reuse of stormwater through infiltration and treatment of urban runoff;thereby, storing runoff to recharge groundwater. Desalination r Yes F%O- No -- Precipitation Enhancement r" Yes F%O- No -- Recycled Municipal Water r" Yes F%O- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F- Yes F%o- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes W No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation j"' Yes F%O- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r" Yes F%O- No -- Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Pollution Prevention Fv Yes F_ No The Project will reduce high pollutant load urban stormwater runoff to the Upper Truckee River,the largest tributary to Lake Tahoe through water quality treatment and infiltration. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F%O- No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes I— No The Project will reduce high pollutant load urban runoff to the Upper Truckee River,the largest tributary to Lake Tahoe through water quality treatment and infiltration. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r" Yes r No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r" Yes F7 No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration P Yes F_ No The Project will reduce pollutant loading to Lake Tahoe from urban runoff, in an effort to promote restoration of the impaired water body. Forest Management r— Yes P No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F%_0 No -- Recharge Areas Protection Yes rv— No -- Water-dependent Recreation W Yes r No The Lake Tahoe's economic vitality depends on lake clarity and water- dependent recreation.Treating runoff from the Tahoe Valley Project will help preserve Lake Tahoe's world renown color and clarity, which is vital to the region's recreation and economy. Watershed Management r Yes F%_0 No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F� Yes I— No The Project will reduce flood risk via infiltration/storage of stormwater runoff. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 750000 $$- 0 750000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $7,000/year 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes Fy-1 No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 750000 7000 various water quality treatment basis on public- owned parcels Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project US Forest Service $350,000 cost (SNPLMA) d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding uncertain sources: $750,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. California Tahoe Conservancy, US Forest Service e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M maintenance costs will be funded through the will be financed for the 25-year planning City's General Fund period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, planning level cost estimates from Tahoe Valley planning, bid,etc.) Conceptual Alternatives Analysis (2012) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if If the project is unfunded,the existing conditions the project is not funded. (300 words or less) will continue to exist, resulting in high pollutant load urban stormwater runoff discharging to the Upper Truckee River,which discharges to Lake Tahoe. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F%O- Yes Conceptual planning for 1/1/2012 6/1/2012 Evaluation F- r No water quality improvements F N/A completed as part of the Tahoe Valley SWIP Streamlined Existing Conditions Analysis and Conceptual Layout of Alternatives b. Final Design F_ Yes Formulation of a Project 6/1/2014 12/1/2015 F%O W No TAC and begin design of Recommended F_ N/A Alternative. Complete design through formulation of construction bid documents. c. Environmental F_ Yes tbd pending initiation of 1/1/2015 6/1/2015 Documentation F- F%o No design (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F_ Yes tbd pending initiation of 1/1/2015 12/1/2015 r F%O- No design r N/A e. Construction r Yes tbd pending funding -- -- Contracting r No N/A f. Construction r Yes tbd pending funding -- -- Implementation W/ No N/A Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed TMDL, EIP project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Tahoe Valley SWIP Streamlined feasibility of this project Existing Conditions Analysis and Conceptual Layout of Alternatives Report c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The scientific basis for the Tahoe research has been conducted) of the proposed project in Valley Project is based on the Lake 300 words or less. Tahoe TMDL.The Lake Tahoe TMDL focuses on the reduction of Fine Sediment Particles (FSP)that reach Lake Tahoe. The Lake Tahoe TMDL estimates 2/3 of Fine Sediment Particles (FSP) loads originate in urban runoff.The bulk of FSP from urban runoff is generated by primary roads (Highway 50), secondary roads (City streets) and commercial/industrial land uses (the Highway 50 Commercial Core). The Tahoe Valley Project will reduce the amount of FSP currently discharging directly to the Upper Truckee River, the largest tributary to Lake Tahoe. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes . No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe beneficial reuse of stormwater through infiltration e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No rv- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No FV_ N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No P/ N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No P/ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No Fv- N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No %0 N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the Yes No %0 N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization El Dorado County Name of Primary Contact Daniel Kikkert Name of Secondary Contact Russell Wigart Mailing Address 924B Emerald Bay Rd., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail russell.wigart@edcgov.us; dan.kikkert@edcgov.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-573-7924; 530-573-7914 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy, United States Forest Service, Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Meyers SEZ and Erosion Control Project Project Category R Restoration ►r Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Urban development in the Meyers residential area has resulted in a (Briefly describe the project, in concentrated flow of storm water from the County of El Dorado 300 words or less) (County) right-of-way (ROW) directed to pervious forested land as well as to the Upper Truckee River. The hydrologic connectivity between Lake Tahoe and the Meyers area results in a high to moderate potential to deliver fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. Also, within this project area, a critical large Stream Environment Zone (SEZ) meadow system was modified in the early 1960's which disconnected the meadow system from the historic Meyers Creek. A critical phase of this project will be to reconnect this creek with its historic floodplain allowing for natural filtration of storm water runoff allowing for a reduction in both pollutant concentration and volume to downstream areas.This project proposes to provide both Erosion Control and SEZ components for restoration. Infiltration improvements are proposed within the County ROW throughout the Project area as well as restoring wetland connectivity. Storm water runoff from the Project will be directed into infiltration improvements providing a direct reduction in the transport of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. It is also anticipated that urban stormwater infrastructure will be upgraded to current design specifications with conveyance improved to allow for proper flow sizing/ routing.The Project will complete/complement the previous series of erosion control and water quality project efforts within the area. The outfall points of the Project are in close proximity to the Upper Truckee River, which is connected via an ephemeral creek. Included within these areas are three Environmental Improvement Program (EIP) projects,#189, Tahoe Sierra IRWM #190, and#191 for Tahoe Paradise Meadowvale,Tahoe Paradise - Mandan, and Meyers Residential, respectively. Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes,this project ties in directly with larger project components that a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, are currently in either the implementation or development stage. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so These projects include 1) Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement provide description. Program(s), and 2) Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load reduction efforts. In addition, the project components are related to both local, regional and state planning efforts to help improve water quality and restore the natural processes of the environment. Political Support—List related 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 208 of the Clean Water MOUs,agreements or TACs Act, the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) prepared a Water currently in place. Quality Management Plan (208 Plan) in 1978 for the Lake Tahoe Basin. The 208 Plan identifies erosion, runoff, and disturbance resulting from development such as subdivision roads as primary causes of the decline of Lake Tahoe's water quality. The 208 Plan also mandates that capital improvement projects such as this Project be implemented to bring all County roads into compliance with Best Management Practices (BMPs) by the year 2008.2. In the early 1980's, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Lahontan Region (Lahontan) adopted a Basin Plan that also mandated that BMPs be implemented within the Tahoe Basin to protect the water quality of Lake Tahoe and its tributaries.3. In 1987,the CTC completed a report entitled "A Report on Soil Erosion Control Needs and Project in the Basin"that further identified specific project areas for BMP retrofit.4. In 1992,TRPA and the County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding(MOU) related to completing various water quality and erosion control efforts within the County of El Dorado using Maintenance and Operations Division.5. In 1997,TRPA developed a Basin-wide Environmental Improvement Program (EIP)that defined various projects in need of BMP/erosion control retrofits.6. In 2007, Basin plan updates and TMDL effort.7. In 2013,TRPA Regional Plan Update Project Location: Latitude: 38.85736 Longitude: -120.01280 Project Location Description The Project is bordered by U.S. Highway 50/State Route 89 (e.g., along the south bank of (US50/SR89)to the south and northeast, Santa Fe Road to the east, stream/river between river and subdivision limits to the north and west. The Project area miles or miles from encompasses County ROW, CTC, USFS, and privately owned property Towns/intersection and/or SLT, CA. address): Project Template Page 2 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes requires the reduction of Fine attainment date, and participate in r N/A Sediment Particles to Lake the development of future TMDLs. Tahoe. This project meets that objective. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project will use LID, -- implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater runoff volume stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A reduction and infiltration as control/restoration to meet Water well as source control Quality Objectives (WQOs)for practice to prevent erosion. receiving water bodies established in Restoring wetlands and SEZ the Basin Plan within the planning components will also be horizon. addressed. WQ3 - Implement water quality This project currently has a -- monitoring programs through r Yes water quality monitoring planning horizon, and coordinate i— N/A component to measure flow annually throughout the Region. and concentration of pollutants and pollutant loads. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, A phase of this project -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes involves the restoration and to re-establish natural water filtering i— N/A large meadow system and re- processes. connection of the floodplain to its surface water(Meyers Creek). Project Template Page 3 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water This project will work with -- conservation measures and practices r Yes South Tahoe Public Utility to meet state goals. r N/A District to reduce the need for irrigation of landscaping and provide for water recycling through storage and reuse. GWM1 - Maintain and monitor r Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Public outreach and -- protection activities for high quality r Yes Community watershed groundwater, and advocate for r N/A education is critical goal of improvements to impacted this project. groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural i;-,F N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The restoration of Meyers -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes Creek to a historic and associated uplands to support healthy r N/A disconnected flooplain will watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife meet all the goals of ER1. and plant habitats. Project Template Page 4 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement Preventing the spread and -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes eradication of invasive existing invasive species and r N/A species through vegetative colonization of potential future management and native invasive species. plant selection will be encouraged through the project and public participation process. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Defensible space, wildfire -- public and private landowners, r Yes prevention and compliance activities to manage forest health and r N/A with applicable laws will be wildfire risks. encouraged through the project delivery and community engagement process. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts V, Y This project has an element -- es caused by existing and new to investigate and implement development. r N/A residential and commercial joint treatment BMPs. Also this project will work with all residential and commercial areas to implement BMPs from developed sites. Project Template Page 5 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The project will be working -- water-related planning activities r Yes with the community to within the planning horizon as r N/A implement portions of the supported by current and future community plan and also watershed science. providing feedback to the scientific community through monitoring and measurements. All information from this project will be coordinated through the Regional Storm water Monitoring Program. Sustainable methods, water efficiency, storm water harvesting will be encouraged through public outreach and participation. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project fits into a -- multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes regional program and utilizes Region for information exchange. r N/A collaboration and information exchange among implementing agencies. IWM3 - Increase public education and This project includes an -- awareness of watershed functions, r Yes extensive community protection and restoration needs to i_ N/A outreach component to encourage stewardship by the public. inform and educate the public of the need for BMP retrofit and encourage public participation through BMP implementation, rain water harvesting, recycling, nutrient management and responsible management practices. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes Fv N/A Project Template Page 6 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water harvesting for reuse, -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge groundwater recharge,flood r N/A through stormwater management) in local and regional infiltration,water quality planning efforts and support efforts improvements through to continue improving the science. restoration of stream zones and infiltration of runoff. Meteorological data will continued to be collected to understand the long term trend in rainfall and runoff with water quality and runoff volume data recorded to understand benefits. All data will be collected and distributed to the scientific community as information is collected and compiled. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 7 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Provide for flow routing and flow climate change3. control, groundwater recharge and water supply. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Encourage xeriscaping and rain water emissions (e.g.green technology). harvesting for irrigation. Promote water reuse and discourage using local water supplies for irrigation. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes Fv- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency Fv- Yes F- No Water conservation programs help to increase urban water use efficiency. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local Yes F%-O No -- System Reoperation Yes F%O- No -- Project Template Page 8 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers Yes FV- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater I Yes F- No groundwater recharge/restoring surface hydrology Desalination r Yes FY-1 No -- Precipitation Enhancement F- Yes FV- No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes FV- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local !"' Yes F%O- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes F%o No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F%O- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes FV- No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes f- No Decrease sediment and nutrient loading to the Upper Truckee River and Lake Tahoe. Salt and Salinity Management Yes rv- No -- Urban Runoff Management F%O- Yes F- No This project will improve water quality through infiltration, source control, restoration and the upgrading of infrastructure. This project area is the largest fine sediment contributor to Lake Tahoe in El Dorado County and is expected to yield significant load reductions for the Tahoe TMDL. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes FY-1 No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F- Yes F%-O No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration PO Yes F- No This project includes the restoration of several acres of active floodplain and meadow. The anticipated benefits include vegetation,wildlife, invertebrates, water foul and water quality. Forest Management r- Yes Fv- No -- Land Use Planning and Management rv- Yes F- No This project will be designed in coordination with the Meyers Area Master Plan and the County of EL Dorado Stormwater Management Plan. Recharge Areas Protection r Yes Fv- No -- Project Template Page 9 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water-dependent Recreation Fv Yes F No This project area has a golfcourse and small recreation water body located within the project boundary. Watershed Management FV_ Yes F_ No This project will implement sustainable solutions to implement plans, programs and projects that support and enhance terrestrial life within its boundary. The project seeks to manage water quality, drainage and stormwater runoff. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes F%_0 No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 10 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 550000 $$- 0 550000 OR F_ DAC 2. Annual Operations and 515,000 0 565000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P/ Yes i— No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 275000 15000 Erosion Control and Water Quality Improvements Phase 2 275000 0 Stream Environment Zone (SEZ) and Wetland Restoration Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project SNPLMA Erosion $250,000 cost Control d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be provided will be financed for the 25-year planning by the County of El Dorado Maintenance and period for project implementation (not grant Operations Division and the County Road Fund. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Pre-project planning has indicated this to have the planning, bid, etc.) largest load reduction potential for the County in the next 10 years. Tahoe TMDL modeling and pre project planning has verified the need and basis for this project through load reduction analysis. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? i�, Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if If not funded the SEZ in this area will remain the project is not funded. (300 words or less) circumvented via a ditch and the subdivision connected to receiving water. If not funded this area will continue to produce elevated levels of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe reducing the opportunity to meet water quality objectives and compliance with the Tahoe TMDL. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Project Template Page 11 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and W Yes This project is currently 1/1/2013 12/1/2014 Evaluation r r No evaluating existing conditions and !` N/A formulating alternatives. b. Final Design r` Yes The design of this project 12/1/201 6/1/2015 Wo No is not yet complete. 4 Funding for 50% design is I— N/A secured. c. Environmental r Yes Funding is secured for 6/1/2014 12/1/2015 Documentation �— W No environmental (CECI.A/NEPA) documentation. r N/A d. Permitting r Yes Permitting has not yet -- -- f Wo No been completed. r" N/A e. Construction r` Yes -- -- -- Contracting P0 No r` N/A f. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Implementation r r No N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 12 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Meyers Area Plan, County of El project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Dorado Stormwater Management Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Plan/ Pollutant Load Reduction Plan, Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Lahontan Basin Plan,TRPA Regional Plan, DWR Urban Water Management Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the County of El Dorado Stormwater feasibility of this project Management Plan/ Pollutant Load Reduction Plan, County of El Dorado Existing Conditions Report. Upper Truckee River Project Feasibility Report c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Pollutant Load Analysis is complete research has been conducted) of the proposed project in detailing modeled estimates. The 300 words or less. County is also collecting water quality and flow data downstream to identify sources and load reduction potentials. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. d Yes No i— N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The project will be following the concepts of LID in order to restore the hydrologic cycle to mimic pre development hydrology e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F%o- Yes F- No 1- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Fv- Yes No r N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No v N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: Project Template Page 13 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No W N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No W7 N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the r Yes F No W N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No P/ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 14 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization El Dorado County Name of Primary Contact Daniel Kikkert Name of Secondary Contact Russell Wigart Mailing Address 924B Emerald Bay Rd., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail russell.wigart@edcgov.us, dan.kikkert@edcgov.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-573-7924, 530-573-7914 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy, United States Forest Service, Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Oflyng Erosion Control Project Project Category P Restoration ►r Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Urban development in the Oflyng residential area has resulted in a (Briefly describe the project, in concentrated flow of storm water from the County of El Dorado 300 words or less) (County) right-of-way (ROW) directed to pervious forested land as well as the Upper Truckee River. The hydrologic connectivity between Lake Tahoe and the Oflyng area results in a high to moderate potential to deliver fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. This project proposes to provide Erosion Control Improvements to the project area. Infiltration improvements are proposed within the County ROW throughout the Project area. Storm water runoff from the Project will be directed into infiltration improvements providing a direct reduction in the transport of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. It is also anticipated that urban stormwater infrastructure will be upgraded to current design specifications with conveyance improved to allow for proper flow sizing/ routing.The Project will complete/complement the previous series of erosion control and water quality project efforts within the area. The outfall points of the Project are in close proximity to the Upper Truckee River, which is connected via an ephemeral creek. Included within these areas are three Environmental Improvement Program (EIP) projects,#189, #190, and #191 for Tahoe Paradise Meadowvale, Tahoe Paradise - Mandan, and Meyers Residential, respectively. Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Tahoe Sierra IRWM Does this project contribute to Yes,this project ties in directly with larger project components that a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, are currently in either the implementation or development stage. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so These projects include 1) Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement provide description. Program(s), 2) Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load reduction efforts. In addition, the project components are related to both local, regional and state planning efforts to help improve water quality and restore the natural processes of the environment, and 3)the County Meyers SEZ and Erosion Control Project Political Support—List related 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 208 of the Clean Water MOUs, agreements or TACs Act, the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) prepared a Water currently in place. Quality Management Plan (208 Plan) in 1978 for the Lake Tahoe Basin. The 208 Plan identifies erosion, runoff, and disturbance resulting from development such as subdivision roads as primary causes of the decline of Lake Tahoe's water quality. The 208 Plan also mandates that capital improvement projects such as this Project be implemented to bring all County roads into compliance with Best Management Practices (BMPs) by the year 2008.2. In the early 1980's, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Lahontan Region (Lahontan) adopted a Basin Plan that also mandated that BMPs be implemented within the Tahoe Basin to protect the water quality of Lake Tahoe and its tributaries.3. In 1987,the CTC completed a report entitled "A Report on Soil Erosion Control Needs and Project in the Basin"that further identified specific project areas for BMP retrofit.4. In 1992,TRPA and the County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding(MOU) related to completing various water quality and erosion control efforts within the County of El Dorado using the Department of Transportations Maintenance Division.5. In 1997, TRPA developed a Basin-wide Environmental Improvement Program (EIP)that defined various projects in need of BMP/erosion control retrofits.6. In 2007, Basin plan updates and TMDL effort.7. In 2013, TRPA Regional Plan Update Project Location: Latitude: 38.86222 Longitude: -120.00780 Project Location Description The Project is bordered by Southern Pines to the south, Skyline Drive (e.g., along the south bank of to the west, Pioneer Trail to the east, and subdivision limits to the stream/river between river north. The Project area encompasses County ROW, California Tahoe miles or miles from Conservancy(CTC), USFS, and privately owned property SLT, CA. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes requires the reduction of Fine attainment date, and participate in r N/A Sediment Particles to Lake the development of future TMDLs. Tahoe. This project meets that objective. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project will use LID, -- implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater runoff volume stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A reduction and infiltration as control/restoration to meet Water well as source control Quality Objectives (WQOs)for practice to prevent erosion. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality This project currently has a -- monitoring programs through r Yes water quality monitoring planning horizon, and coordinate r- N/A component to measure flow annually throughout the Region. and concentration of pollutants and pollutant loads. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. V N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water This project will work with -- conservation measures and practices r Yes STPUD to reduce the need to meet state goals. r N/A for irrigation of landscaping and provide for water recycling through storage and reuse GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future r Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Public outreach and -- protection activities for high quality r Yes Community watershed groundwater, and advocate for i_ N/A education is critical goal of improvements to impacted this project groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement Preventing the spread and -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes eradication of invasive existing invasive species and r N/A species through vegetative colonization of potential future management and native invasive species. plant selection will be encouraged through the project and public participation process. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Defensible space, wildfire -- public and private landowners, r Yes prevention and compliance activities to manage forest health and r N/A with applicable laws will be wildfire risks. encouraged through the project delivery and community engagement process. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes This project has an element -- caused by existing and new to investigate and implement development. F N/A residential and commercial joint treatment BMPs. Also this project will work with all residential and commercial areas to implement BMPs from developed sites. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The project will be working -- water-related planning activities r Yes with the community to within the planning horizon as F N/A implement portions of the supported by current and future community plan and also watershed science. providing feedback to the scientific community through monitoring and measurements. All information from this project will be coordinated through the Regional Storm water Monitoring Program. Sustainable methods, water efficiency, storm water harvesting will be encouraged through public outreach and participation. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project fits into a -- multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes regional program and utilizes Region for information exchange. r N/A collaboration and information exchange among implementing agencies Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and This project includes an -- awareness of watershed functions, r Yes extensive community protection and restoration needs to r N/A outreach component to encourage stewardship by the public. inform and educate the public of the need for BMP retrofit and encourage public participation through BMP implementation, rain water harvesting, recycling, nutrient management and responsible management practices IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes Fv N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water harvesting for reuse, -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge groundwater recharge,flood r N/A through stormwater management) in local and regional infiltration,water quality planning efforts and support efforts improvements through to continue improving the science. restoration of stream zones and infiltration of runoff. Meteorological data will continued to be collected to understand the long term trend in rainfall and runoff with water quality and runoff volume data recorded to understand benefits. All data will be collected and distributed to the scientific community as information is collected and compiled. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. P0 N/A -- c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Provide for flow routing and flow climate change3. control, groundwater recharge and water supply e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Encourage xeriscaping and rain water emissions (e.g.green technology). harvesting for irrigation. Promote water reuse and discourage using local water supplies for irrigation. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Urban Water Use Efficiency Fv- Yes F- No Water conservation programs help to increase urban water use efficiency Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes F%o- No -- System Reoperation I— Yes FV- No -- Water Transfers r Yes 1v No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater P- Yes r- No groundwater recharge and restoring surface hydrology Desalination r- Yes Wo No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes FV- No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes FV- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes FV- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes P No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation !"' Yes tv No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes FV- No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes F- No Decrease sediment and nutrient loading to the Upper Truckee River and Lake Tahoe Salt and Salinity Management t- Yes FV- No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes f- No This project will improve water quality through infiltration, source control, restoration and the upgrading of infrastructure. This project is the largest fine sediment contributor to Lake Tahoe in El Dorado County and is expected to yield significant load reductions for the Tahoe TMDL. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F- Yes FV- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F- Yes F%o- No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration ry-, Yes r No This project includes the restoration of several acres of active floodplain and meadow. The anticipated benefits include vegetation,wildlife, invertebrates, water foul and water quality Forest Management I— Yes FV- No -- Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Land Use Planning and Management Fv Yes F_ No This project will be designed in coordination with the Meyers Area Master Plan and the County of EL Dorado Stormwater Management Plan Recharge Areas Protection Yes F%O- No -- Water-dependent Recreation !"' Yes F%o- No -- Watershed Management V Yes r No This project will implement sustainable solutions to implement plans, programs and projects that support and enhance terrestrial life within its boundary. The project seeks to manage water quality, drainage and stormwater runoff Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes F%_0 No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 225000 $$22,500 0 247500 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $7,500 0 7500 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P/ Yes i— No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 225000 7500 Design of Erosion Control and Water Quality Improvements Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be provided will be financed for the 25-year planning by the County of El Dorado street maintenance period for project implementation (not grant division and the County Road fund funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Water Quality and sediment transport modeling planning, bid, etc.) has calculated this area to be a high priority site. Tahoe TMDL modeling and pollutant load reduction analysis has verified the need and basis for this project. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? V Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if If not funded this area will continue to produce the project is not funded. (300 words or less) elevated levels of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe reducing the opportunity to meet water quality objectives and compliance with the Tahoe TMDL. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r` Yes This project is currently 1/1/2013 12/1/2014 Evaluation r r No evaluating existing conditions r N/A b. Final Design r Yes TBD 12/1/201 12/1/2015 Iv- No 4 N/A c. Environmental r Yes TBD 6/1/2015 12/1/2015 Documentation r No (CEQA/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting r Yes TBD 6/1/2015 12/1/2015 r ry No r N/A e. Construction r Yes TBD 5/1/2016 10/1/2016 Contracting r PO No r N/A f. Construction r Yes TBD 5/1/2016 10/1/2016 Implementation r P No r N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Meyers Area Community Plan, project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General County of El Dorado Stormwater Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Management Plan/ Pollutant Load Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Reduction Plan, Lahontan Basin Plan, TRPA Regional Plan, DWR Urban Water Management Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the County of El Dorado Stormwater feasibility of this project Management Plan/ Pollutant Load Reduction Plan, County of El Dorado Existing Conditions Report. Upper Truckee River Project Feasibility Report c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Pollutant Load Analysis is complete research has been conducted) of the proposed project in detailing modeled estimates. The 300 words or less. County is also collecting water quality and flow data downstream to identify sources and load reduction potentials. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. d Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The project will be following the concepts of LID in order to restore the hydrologic cycle to mimic pre development hydrology e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? i� Yes I— No I— N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements id Yes F- No F- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F- Yes F- No FV- N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No W N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No W7 N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the r Yes F No W N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No P/ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization American Rivers Name of Primary Contact Julie Fair Name of Secondary Contact Luke Hunt Mailing Address 432 Broad St, Nevada City, CA 95959 E-mail jfair@americanrivers.org Phone (###)###-#### 530 412 1156 Other Cooperating Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Alpine Watershed Group, Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Friends of Hope Valley,Trout Unlimited, Institute for Bird Populations, California Department of Fish and Wildlife Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Hope Valley Meadow Restoration Project Category R Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Restoration of Hope Valley meadow in the upper West Fork Carson (Briefly describe the project, in River to enhance the full range of ecosystem services this highly 300 words or less) visible and well know meadow has potential to provide including: natural water storage, flood attenuation, cooling and filtering of water, aquatic and riparian habitat, and recreational values. Restoration activities include stabilizing high, bare streambanks using vegetation and toe stabilization techniques, creating floodplain benches, protecting a meander bend from cutting off, stabilizing headcuts on tributaries, and creating standing water depressions for improved fish and bird habitat. Total number of projects 1 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes, it is Phase 4 of a meadow restoration project designed to a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, proceed in 4 phases; 1) assessment and conceptual designs, 2) EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so technical restoration designs, 3) NEPA and permitting, and 4) provide description. implementation and adaptive management. Political Support—List related Hope Valley Meadow Restoration Stakeholder and Advisory MOUs, agreements or TACs Committee currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 38.74944 Longitude: -119.93470 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description The project area encompasses—400 acres of meadow and —3.5 miles (e.g., along the south bank of of the upper West Fork Carson River in the upper end of Hope Valley, stream/river between river along Blue Lakes Rd off of Highway 88. miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, This project aims to increase 8800 ft of wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes riparian and wet meadow streambank to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A extent in Hope Valley, restoration processes. through bank stabilization projected and revegetation. It will reduce the amount of sediment entering the river and improve shading by vegetation resulting in reduced sediment delivery and cooler temperatures downstream. It will also promote increased infiltration and retention in the longterm providing additional filtration benefits. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. Fv' N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future r Yes reliability. Fv N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Fv N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water This project aims to improve 8800 ft of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes the hydrological connectivity streambank associated uplands to support healthy r N/A and vegetation of the restoration watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife riparian zone in Hope Valley. projected and plant habitats. Plants will have improved access to water, birds will have improved cover and food sources, and fish will have increased cover, undercut banks and shading and an overall improvement in aquatic habitat. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and ry N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes -- -- r caused by existing and new development. Cv N/A Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Restoration designs 35 stakeholders water-related planning activities r Yes incorporate current continue to be within the planning horizon as r NSA watershed science for the involved in supported by current and future West Carson River, such as restoration watershed science. the Upper Carson River planning process Stream Corridor Condition Assessment, and meadow restoration techniques that have been successful elsewhere. Designs have also been refined through a collaborative stakeholder review process. Stakeholders include federal and state agencies, regional and local partners,tribal leaders and local community members. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Restoration in Hope Valley 10 meadow multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes has had diverse project practitioners Region for information exchange. r NSA partner involvement informed by including natural resource Hope Valley agencies, state research restoration entities, and local non-profits projected and will act as a case-study to inform other meadow restoration projects in the region. IWM3 - Increase public education and As part of the Hope Valley 10 volunteers awareness of watershed functions, r Yes restoration project, project contributing 300 protection and restoration needs to r NSA partners Alpine Watershed volunteer hours encourage stewardship by the public. Group and Friends of Hope per field season Valley organize a "Meadow projected Stewards"group of community volunteers that conduct water quality monitoring and vegetation improvements at the project site. Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes Fv N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Hope Valley restoration 1 document water quality,water supply, r Yes designs include climate addressing groundwater recharge,flood r N/A change projections for the climate change management) in local and regional region. Meadow restoration and meadow planning efforts and support efforts improves climate resiliency restoration in to continue improving the science. by increasing water storage, Hope Valley improving late season baseflows, and attenuating peak floodflows. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Meadow restoration will improve considerations. habitat for the many plants with tribal significance that occur in meadows. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A The Woodfords Washoe Community(Alpine Village) downstream of the project if considered a DAC community. It would experience any water quality benefits provided by the project. Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Meadow restoration improves climate climate change3. resiliency by increasing water storage, improving late season baseflows, and attenuating peak floodflows. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Improvements in root biomass emissions (e.g.green technology). associated with vegetation increases contribute minimally to carbon sequestration f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes F%-o No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes Fv- No -- System Reoperation r Yes S-0 No -- Water Transfers r" Yes r No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater Yes rv- No -- Desalination r- Yes F%-O No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes F%-O No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes F%-O No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes F%O- No -- Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes r No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r" Yes r No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes r No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes r No Banks stabilization will reduce the amount of suspended sediment downstream of the project. Restoration of Hope Valley prevents sediment from entering source water. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes r No -- Urban Runoff Management r" Yes r No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r" Yes r No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes r No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration V Yes r No Bank stabilization and vegetation will restore riparian, aquatic and wet meadow habitat, providing improved and increased plant,fish, and wildlife habitat, water quality, water supply and flood attenuation benefits. Forest Management r- Yes r No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes r No -- Recharge Areas Protection r" Yes r No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes r No Restoration of the riparian area will improve aquatic habitat, benefiting the fishery and improving opportunities for recreational fishing. It will also enhance the recreational experience for paddling, wildlife viewing, camping and others. Watershed Management r Yes r No Planning for the project has been developed in conjunction with watershed focused groups including the Alpine Watershed Group and the Carson Water Subconservancy. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes r No Restoration will enhance Hope Valley meadow's ability to absorb, store and slowly release floodwaters during events. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 375000 $$475,000 0 850000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 850000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes Fy-1 No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 0 0 -- Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Wildlife $475,000 cost Conservation Society, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Cost estimate based on technical design plans for planning, bid, etc.) restoration g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes v No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Without the project,the meander bend the project the project is not funded. (300 words or less) aims to protect might cutoff creating a loss of 1500 ft of streambank and mobilizing 7500 cubic yards of sediment. Incision and bank instability will propagate upstream through the currently most stable reach of the valley. In addition, Hope Valley will go without important improvements in habitat and water quality. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and P Yes American Rivers 7/1/2011 10/1/2012 Evaluation r No conducted assessments of geomorphic, N/A hydrologic, and ecologic meadow attributes to establish baseline conditions and inform project designs b. Final Design F%O- Yes American Rivers worked 10/1/201 5/1/2013 F- F_ No with Waterways 2 Consulting, Inc. to F_ N/A complete and vet community support for permit-ready technical designs. c. Environmental r Yes The Humboldt-Toiyabe 1/1/2014 4/1/2015 Documentation F,/_ FV_ No National Forest is leading (CEQA/NEPA) NEPA,with completion F_ N/A expected in Spring 2015. CEQA will be informed by the NEPA process. d. Permitting r Yes 404 and 401 permits will 1/1/2014 4/1/2015 W W No be acquired from the US Army Corps of Engineers r N/A and Regional Water Quality Control Board by Spring of 2015 e. Construction r Yes TBD 4/1/2015 7/1/2015 Contracting �— P No r N/A Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. Construction Yes Will include site setup 8/1/2015 10/1/2015 Implementation �— No and mobilization, construction, N/A revegetation, and demobilization and clean up. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is We are completing NEPA, CEQA and all additional necessary permits checked as current status under the same funding cycle. Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Carson River Watershed Adaptive project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Stewardship Plan; Carson River Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Regional Floodplain Management Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Hope Valley Meadow Restoration feasibility of this project Project- SO% Basis of Design Reportavailable here: https://amrivers.box.com/s/w43mef p70gljtt6eO8lm c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Detailed geomorphic, hydrologic and research has been conducted) of the proposed project in ecologic assessments were 300 words or less. conducted to inform restoration designs. Assessments included channel cross section surveys, including measurements of particle size and bankful depth, streamflow and water temperature measurements, hydraulic modeling, bank stability assessments, resurveying historic vegetation plots, and soil profile assessment. A detailed topographic and photo mosaic basemap were also produced. Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes F No r%_0 N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F%O_ N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F%o N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F%o N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No F%o N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No Fv- N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No Fy-, N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No FV_ N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No F%70 N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Kim Garon Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and California Tahoe Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Conservancy Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Iroquois Pond SEZ Restorations Project Category F Restoration v, Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description A preliminary plan was completed by Northwest Hydraulic (Briefly describe the project, in Consultants. It includes an analysis of existing conditions at the 300 words or less) Iroquois Pond site, development and analysis of restoration options, and development of an initial restoration design. The project consists of removal of aging facilities and SEZ restoration of the Iroquois Pond site.This project helps to achieve high priority soil erosion control and water quality improvement needs under the EIP. The preliminary design includes removal of the dam and reconstruction of about 90 feet of stream channel through the pond area. The stream channel is proposed for construction at an average gradient of about 8%, and will include fabric encapsulated soil banks. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 6 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes,the TRPA EIP lists SEZ Restoration at specific sites throughout the a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Tahoe Basin and this site will contribute to that effort. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related TRPA and CTC are supportive of the project. MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 38.84833 Longitude: -119.99470 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description The project site is located south of Iroquois Circle in the Apache (e.g., along the south bank of Subdivision in Meyers, California. The site is on land managed by the stream/river between river Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit of the US Forest Service and is in miles or miles from Section 33 of Township 12 North Range 18 East. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Tahoe Regional Planning 90 feet of stream standards in accordance with the r Yes Agency's Environmental channel attainment date, and participate in r N/A Improvement Program restoration and the development of future TMDLs. document lists Stream dam removal Environment Zone restoration as an important element in implementing the Lake Tahoe TMDL. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project helps reduce -- implementing measures such as r Yes pollutant loads by providing stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A high priority soil erosion control/restoration to meet Water control and water quality Quality Objectives (WQOs)for improvements. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State I% N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, The projects design plans -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes include removal of the dam to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A and reconstruction of about processes. 90 ft of stream channel through the pond area. Restoration of most of the pond area (about 7,00 sf) as functional SEZ. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. F%' N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. F%' N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water This project helps to enhance -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes and restore water bodies and associated uplands to support healthy r N/A riparian areas. It will also watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife help achieve high priority soil and plant habitats. erosion control and water quality improvement needs. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes The restoration of the site -- caused by existing and new includes maintaining the development. r N/A existing alignment downstream because it maintains the widest band of downstream SEZ and minimizes construction disturbance and ecosystem impacts.The removal of the obsolete water treatment facilities will repair impacts of development. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Both the TRPA and CTC are -- multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes supportive of the project. Region for information exchange. r N/A Both the TRPA and CTC specifically requested that STPUD include the Iroquois Pond SEZ Restoration Project as a component of the larger STPUD Comprehensive Erosion Control Project. IWM3 - Increase public education and This project promotes public -- awareness of watershed functions, r Yes education and awareness of protection and restoration needs to F N/A SEZ values. encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes Fv N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A Yes, South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community and the project is located in this community. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes Fv- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Po- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local )— Yes Fv- No -- System Reoperation j— Yes Fv- No -- Water Transfers I— Yes F%-o No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes F,/_ No -- Desalination r Yes F,/_ No -- Precipitation Enhancement Yes FV_ No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes FV_ No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local !"' Yes F%o- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes F%o No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F%o- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use Yes FV_ No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes F_ No The project would reduce the nutrient load into the stream by restoring natural habitat. Salt and Salinity Management Yes FV_ No -- Urban Runoff Management !`"' Yes F%o No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes I;_7 No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes k— No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r%o- Yes F_ No The project includes 90 feet of stream restoration, as well as the removal of obsolete water treatment facilities from the stream environment zone. Forest Management r Yes r No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes r No -- Recharge Areas Protection r- Yes r No -- Water-dependent Recreation r" Yes r No -- Watershed Management !`"' Yes F%-o No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management I— Yes FV_ No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 266250 $$- 0 266250 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $17,040 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes Fy-1 No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 0 0 -- Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs STPUD General Funds will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Planning documents planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The restoration of Iroquois Pond through the the project is not funded. (300 words or less) removal of the water treatment facility and subsequent restoration of the site would not occur without funding. Therefore,the resultant benefits of lessening polutant loads and contributing to the implementation of the Lake Tahoe TMDL would not occur. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Vo Yes -- 7/1/2009 6/1/2010 Evaluation r r No r N/A b. Final Design r Yes -- 7/1/2009 6/1/2010 1� r No r N/A c. Environmental r Yes -- 7/1/2009 2/1/2010 Documentation r r No (CEQA/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting F_ Yes Permitting will occur 5/1/2015 10/1/2015 F%O- r No when project is ready to be implemented. F N/A e. Construction F_ Yes Construction will need to 5/1/2015 10/1/2015 Contracting r No be bid and awarded. r N/A f. Construction r Yes Full implementation of 5/1/2015 10/1/2015 Implementation tv— No the project will occur when funding is secured. r N/A The project cannot be phased. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is This project has been evaluated and designed, but will still need checked as current status permitting, construction contracting and implementation when a funding source has been identified. Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed TRPA EIP; Lahontan Basin Plan, Lake project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Tahoe TMDL Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the TRPA Environmental Improvement feasibility of this project Program (EIP) lists several significant studies regarding the importance of restoration within stream environment zones. They are available at the TRPA website: www.trpa.org c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F- Yes F,/- No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F,/- Yes F No 1— N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Fy, Yes F No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements I;-W Yes F- No F- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F- Yes F- No FV- N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F- Yes F- No W N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior i Yes F- No WO N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the d Yes No N/A subject basin? Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No W N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization California Tahoe Conservancy Name of Primary Contact Joe Pepi Name of Secondary Contact Sue Rae Irelan Mailing Address 1061 Third Street, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Jpepi@tahoe.ca.gov Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6066 Other Cooperating Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Greenway Shared Use Trail Project Category F Restoration V Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The South Tahoe Greenway Shared Use Trail phases 1 and 2, is a 2.5 (Briefly describe the project, in mile class one trail segment in the core of South Lake Tahoe, 300 words or less) providing linkages through sensitive environments and one of the most populated portions of region. It is considered a high priority project in completing the bicycle network in South Lake Tahoe. Creating an integrated bicycle/pedestrian network is central to providing alternatives to private automobile use, resulting in decreased vehicle miles traveled and improved air quality and water quality. Specific water quality improvements result from reduced atmospheric deposition of organic and inorganic particles from automobile use, along with a reduction in sediment sources through removal of existing eroding dirt trails. In the longer term, a fully integrated bicycle/pedestrian network is seen as a foundational element to implementation of the Regional Plan, resulting in reduced coverage and improved watershed functioning. Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 2 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to EIP Project#752 contributes to decreased VMT and improved air and a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, water quality. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Political Support—List related Project approval by City of South Lake Tahoe and Tahoe Regional MOUs, agreements or TACs Planning Agency. Special Use Permit issued by USDA Forest Service. currently in place. Letter support by the South Lake Tahoe Recreation Facilities Joint Powers Authority, South Shore Transportation Management Agency, Community Mobility Committee of the Tahoe Sustainable Communities Program. Project Location: Latitude: 38.91835 Longitude: -119.97853 Project Location Description The entire South Tahoe Greenway Trail (all phases) extends 3.86 miles (e.g., along the south bank of through South Lake Tahoe linking the Sierra Tract neighborhood to stream/river between river the Van Sickle Bi-State Park.The current project proposal begins at miles or miles from Sierra Boulevard and Barbara Avenue, crosses Trout Creek and Towns/intersection and/or connects to a short section of existing trail on the Lake Tahoe address): Community College (LTCC) property. It continues beyond the LTCC, crossing Bijou meadow,traveling through the Bijou neighborhood (most of which will be constructed in 2014) until it reaches Pioneer Trail, then completes the connection to Ski Run Boulevard. Project Template Page 2 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Bike trails reduce Daily Reduction of 80 standards in accordance with the V Yes Vehicle Trips (DVT) and DVT and 177 attainment date, and participate in NSA Vehicle Miles Traveled VMT. the development of future TMDLs. (VMT), which in turn Replacement of reduces: auto exhaust 0.1 acres of including small particulates, unstable SEZ and atmospheric dust from trails with paved roadways that enter the trail and watershed. A fully developed restoration of 0.3 bicycle network can also acres SEZ through reduce the need to maintain access or create coverage associated consolidation. with private automobiles such as new roadway or parking facilities.The Greenway will also replace sections of native surface, eroding foot trail with a paved surface and allow consolidation of multiple access trails onto the paved trail, reducing a potential sediment source in storm water runoff. These effects create improvements in storm water quality and assist existing and planned storm water projects to meet TMDL standards. Project Template Page 3 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The Greenway will reduce Reduction of 80 implementing measures such as r Yes DVT and VMT which reduces DVT and 177 stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A auto emission and VMT. control/restoration to meet Water atmospheric dust Replacement of Quality Objectives (WQOs)for contributions to surface 0.1 acres of receiving water bodies established in water in South Lake Tahoe. unstable SEZ the Basin Plan within the planning Bike trails facilitate shifting trails with paved horizon. the transportation mode split trail and throughout the region to restoration of 0.3 reduce dependence on acres SEZ through private automobiles and are access an important element of the consolidation. Regional strategy to achieve water quality thresholds. Additionally,the Greenway will also replace sections of native surface, eroding foot trail with a paved surface, reducing a potential sediment source in storm water runoff. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Project construction would Replacement of wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes result in incremental 0.1 acres of to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A restoration to wetlands and unstable SEZ processes. riparian areas through the trails with paved removal and consolidation of trail and eroding dirt trails. restoration of 0.3 acres SEZ through access consolidation. Project Template Page 4 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater The Greenway utilizes several Interpretive signs: protection activities for high quality r Yes design details to avoid in Bijou Meadow groundwater, and advocate for F N/A groundwater interruption. and near Trout improvements to impacted The signage strategy for this Creek. groundwater quality through public project includes two education. interpretive signs that educate users about these efforts. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. Project Template Page 5 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement Management of the 68 acres programs to prevent the spread of r Yes Greenway Trail will involve monitored existing invasive species and r N/A regular surveys for the colonization of potential future presence of invasive plant invasive species. species and eradication where needed. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes Private automobile use Use of boardwalk caused by existing and new creates multiple impacts to avoids 0.4 acres development. F N/A ecosystems; provisions to disturbance. meet transportation needs Replacement of that do not rely on private 0.1 acres of auto use reduces impacts. unstable SEZ The Greenway reliance on trails with paved boardwalks in key floodplain trail and and wetland areas minimizes restoration of 0.3 impacts from this alternative acres SEZ through transportation system. access Additionally, by directing consolidation. users to a paved surface, existing eroding native surface foot trails can be restored, removing a potential sediment source in storm water runoff. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes Region for information exchange. r N/A Project Template Page 6 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and Bike use has increased 2.5 miles of trail awareness of watershed functions, r Yes throughout the Region, in through a variety protection and restoration needs to r N/A part as a result of increased of ecosystem encourage stewardship by the public. environmental awareness types with and outreach. Meeting interpretive transportation needs outside opportunities the confined space of a throughout. private automobile places the user in the environment and encourages greater connection to and appreciation of it. Maintaining and building on the recent surge in use requires the bicycle network to be upgraded to complete key community connections. The Greenway provides those connections in the heart of South Lake Tahoe. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes Fv N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Bike trails reduce VMT with a VMT reduction of water quality,water supply, r Yes corresponding reduction in 177 results in groundwater recharge,flood r N/A production of greenhouse 1,075 metric management) in local and regional gases.The infrastructure tons/year planning efforts and support efforts needed for bicycles as a reduction in CO2 to continue improving the science. transportation mode creates fewer watershed impacts that can contribute to flooding than that for automobiles.Additionally, bike trails are easier and less expensive to repair after flood events. Project Template Page 7 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A South Tahoe Greenway serves South Lake Tahoe, specifically the following neighborhoods: Sierra Tract, Bijou, North Pioneer Trail. Offers a low cost transportation alternative for economically disadvantaged residents. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A Bike trails are an amenity that low income neighborhoods often do not contain.The Greenway offers this amenity without creating negative effects to neighbors. d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Bike trails are central to the goal of climate change3. shifting transportation needs away from private automobile use. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A The Greenway will reduce VMT by 177 emissions(e.g.green technology). and CO2 by 1,075 metric tons/year. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. Project Template Page 8 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency !"' Yes F,/- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes F,/- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F- Yes Fv- No -- System Reoperation f- Yes Fv- No -- Water Transfers F- Yes Fv- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes W No -- Desalination Yes Fv- No -- Precipitation Enhancement 1- Yes F%o- No -- Recycled Municipal Water Yes F%o- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes Fv- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes rv- No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F- No The Greenway employs use of boardwalk and other designs that reduce or eliminate impact to groundwater when crossing high groundwater areas. Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes Fv- No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes F- No VMT and DVT reduction prevents auto exhaust (including PM10 and other fine particulates) and atmospheric dust contributions to storm water flow. Replacing native surface foot trails with a protected surface pathway eliminates a sediment source in storm water flow. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes Fv- No -- Urban Runoff Management F- Yes Fy-, No -- Project Template Page 9 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes F,/_ No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes F,/_ No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes P-1 No -- Forest Management r Yes FV_ No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F No Development of a complete bicycle network is a key element in modifying the land use pattern in South Lake Tahoe to better protect natural resources. Recharge Areas Protection FV_ Yes I— No The Greenway employs use of boardwalk in specific locations and avoids impacts to aquifer recharge. Water-dependent Recreation Yes r No -- Watershed Management r Yes r- No Reducing dependence on the private automobile is a key strategy for protecting South Lake Tahoe watersheds by reducing auto exhaust, atmospheric dust associated with roadways, and potentially the size and number of new roadways and parking lots. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes W No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 10 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 7520000 $$- 923300 8443300 OR F_ DAC 2. Annual Operations and 512,500 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P/ Yes i— No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 923300 2500 Phase 1a between Glenwood Way and Herbert Avenue.To be constructed in 2014. Phase 2 1620000 5000 Phase 1b between Al Tahoe Boulevard and Glenwood Way. Phase 3 1400000 5000 Phase 1c between Glenwood Way and Ski Run Boulevard Phase 4 4500000 5000 Phase 2 between Sierra Boulevard to the Lake Tahoe Community College Campus, including a new bridge over Trout Creek. Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Prop 84 $923,300 cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Active $7,520,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Transportation, private donations. Uncertain. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Voters in South Lake Tahoe approved a special tax will be financed for the 25-year planning to provide funds for on-going maintenance for bike period for project implementation (not grant trail facilities.This measure will sunset in 2021 at funded). which time the local authorities intend to request renewal. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Estimate for Phase 1a based on final plans and planning, bid, etc.) Engineer's Estimate.This phase to be constructed in 2014. Estimate for other phases based on preliminary plans. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No Project Template Page 11 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM h.Please describe what impact there may be if Without project funding for the Greenway,the the project is not funded. (300 words or less) benefits assumed by Regional land use, transportation and water quality planning efforts will be harder to achieve in South Lake Tahoe. These plans all rely in part on improving the infrastructure available for non-auto travel to facilitate significant watershed improvements. Overall, improved walking and biking facilities will aid concentration of development, sensitive land protection and restoration, and reduction in vehicle miles traveled with related air and water quality improvements. Specifically, project funding for the Greenway will shift transportation away from sole reliance on the private automobile for travel between residential and tourist accommodation areas and highly desirable destinations such as schools, parks, beaches, and shopping in the core of the City.The lost opportunity to create a shared use trail accessible by the widest possible cross section of the population will delay the transportation modal shift central to Regional planning efforts. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 12 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes -- -- 9/1/2011 Evaluation r r No r N/A b. Final Design Yes Use concept plans to 1/1/2015 12/1/2017 W No initiate final design, including additional site N/A investigation, creating final plans/specs, and construction cost estimating. c. Environmental W Yes -- -- 9/1/2011 Documentation r r No (CEQA/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting to Yes -- -- 9/1/2011 r No r N/A e. Construction r Yes Upon completion and 1/1/2016 6/1/2016 Contracting lv No approval of final plans, enter into construction N/A contract for implementation. f. Construction r Yes Construct Greenway 6/1/2016 10/1/2017 Implementation W No Phase xxx r N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is Concept plans, environmental documentation, and regional permitting checked as current status is accomplished.This grant application includes elements to complete final plans, bid and award the construction contract, and complete construction. Project Template Page 13 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed TRPA Regional Plan,TRPA Regional project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Transportation Plan, Lake Tahoe Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat TMDL Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 1. TRPA/TMPO Lake Tahoe Region feasibility of this project Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, Appendix F, related to DVT and VMT reductions from bicycle facilities.2. Lake Tahoe TMDL Report (November 2010) related to atmospheric contribution from auto-related sources to loss of water clarity and other water quality impacts. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The project tiers from research research has been conducted) of the proposed project in conducted for the Tahoe Region 300 words or less. Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and the TRPA Regional Transportation Plan. These document the reduction in VMT from bicycle use and the resulting reduction in auto emissions and production of particulate pollution. Project specific research on site conditions and anticipated impacts completed with the South Tahoe Greenway Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The project encourages travel without using private automobiles. Additionally,final plans could incorporate use of recycled tires in their construction. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes No V N/A Project Template Page 14 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No FV_ N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No FV_ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No W7 N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior r Yes 1-` No V N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the )— Yes r No tv— N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r Yes r No rv- N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 15 of 15 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Alpine Watershed Group Name of Primary Contact Shane Fryer Name of Secondary Contact Sarah Green Mailing Address P.O. Box 296 (Truckee, CA 96162?) E-mail awg.shane@gmail.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-694-2327 Other Cooperating California State Parks, Carson Water Subconservancy District, Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Alpine Trails Association,Alpine County, Is your agency/organization The Alpine Watershed Group believes in this project and has committed to the project through developed a strong coalition of active partners to see the completion? If not, please explain project through to completion. II. General Project Information Project Title Grover Hot Springs State Park Meadow Restoration and ADA Access Project Category R Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The meadow within Grover Hot Springs State Park is a critical natural (Briefly describe the project, in reservoir that sustains late season flow in the East Carson River.The 300 words or less) park is important to the economy of Alpine County and is a popular local and tourist attraction. A poor trail system and social trailing has de watered and introduced weed into large areas of the meadow. This project will develop 1900' of elevated ADA trail along with an accessible platform, improve 1,000 of existing trails, convert 9000' of abandoned road to trail, and remove 4,400' of select trails that impact the meadow. Weeds introduced by social trailing will be removed. An ADA accessible interpretive/educational areas will be developed. Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 2 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Carson River Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related We are formalizing support with partners through MOUs. MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 38.696506 Longitude: -119.84292 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description Alpine County, near Markleeville, within Grover Hot Springs State (e.g., along the south bank of Park. Elevated ADA trail will connect the campground with hot springs stream/river between river on South side of Hot Springs Creek. Select meadow trails will be miles or miles from restored/improved along both sides of the creek. A road to trail Towns/intersection and/or conversion will remove an old road in the north meadow. address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Project will reduce erosion *Stabilize a 114 implementing measures such as r Yes and sedimentation in the acres of meadow. stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A East Carson River by *Remove 4400 of control/restoration to meet Water implementing stabilization, social Quality Objectives (WQOs)for restoration and other erosion trail.*Improve receiving water bodies established in control measures within the 1000 feet of the Basin Plan within the planning meadow. existing horizon. trail.*Develop 1900 feet of ADA elevated trail overthe meadow. *Convert 1000' of road into trail within the meadow. WQ3 - Implement water quality Project will initiate both pre The AWG will monitoring programs through r Yes and post water quality implement a planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A monitoring sampling and pre/post annually throughout the Region. photo monitoring through monitoring the Alpine Watershed Group, strategy. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Poor trails have led to *Stabilize a 114 wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes erosion, compaction, and de acres of meadow. to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A watering of the meadow. *Remove 4400 of processes. The project will restore water social retention and flittering trail.*Improve processes. 1000 feet of existing trail.*Develop 1900 feet of ADA elevated trail overthe meadow. *Convert 1000' of road in the meadow. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet Meadows are natural Stabilize a 114 projected demands for a 20-year r Yes reservoirs of water, slowly acres of meadow. planning horizon. r N/A releasing water late into the season. The project will restore meadow capacity. WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. FV N/A Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM1 - Maintain and monitor FV Yes Project will use monitoring The AWG will groundwater supply to assure future wells to assess meadow implement a reliability. F N/A capacity prior and post pre/post restoration capacities. monitoring strategy. GWM2 - Promote groundwater Parts of the restoration will Project will protection activities for high quality r Yes involve volunteers, schools include volunteer groundwater, and advocate for r N/A and social groups in order to work days, improvements to impacted promote groundwater classes, and groundwater quality through public protection, allow for interpretive/ education. educational opportunities educational and advocate for wetlands. waysides and materials. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water This project will restore Project will bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes wetland and riparian areas by restore and help associated uplands to support healthy r N/A removing select impacting stabilize a 114 watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife trails, and converting a road, acres of meadow and plant habitats. which are de watering and /wetland. eroding Grover Meadow. ER2 - Develop and implement Social trails have introduced Parks and AWG programs to prevent the spread of r Yes russian thistle and other already existing invasive species and r N/A invasives into the meadow. collaborate on colonization of potential future This project will remove weed projects, invasive species. social vectors. An elevated this will augment trail will reduce weed existing introduction. Volunteer programs. weed removal days will be conducted during project. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes The project will remove *Stabilize a 114 caused by existing and new select trials from the acres of meadow. development. F N/A meadow, and conduct a road *Remove 4400 of to trail conversion in 900' of social trail and elevate 1900' of trail trail.*Improve 1000 feet of existing trail.*Develop 1900 feet of ADA elevated trail overthe meadow. *Convert 1000' of road in the meadow. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project is a collaboration -- multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes between California State Region for information exchange. r N/A Parks, Carson Water Subconservancy District, Alpine County and the Alpine Watershed Group. California ADA. Many other partners will participate. Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and Through the Alpine Community work awareness of watershed functions, r Yes Watershed Group's days. Classroom protection and restoration needs to r N/A Education and Outreach participation encourage stewardship by the public. Program opportunities to opportunities. 8+ work with local schools, educational ADA volunteers and other waysides. interested groups will be Volunteers will made. Groups will learn assist with about and directly participate monitoring. in the restoration. Interpretive and educational waysides on function, protection and restoration will be installed along improved trail. IWM4- Promote activities that Project will restore and help Project will reduce flood risk. P Yes stabilize a 114 acres of restore and help F N/A meadow/wetland. The stabilize a 114 restoration will improve the acres of meadow meadows retention of water /wetland. attenuate flooding. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Healthy meadows sequester Project will water quality,water supply, r Yes carbon.The project will restore and help groundwater recharge,flood F N/A improve the meadows ability stabilize a 114 management) in local and regional to sequester carbon, acres of meadow planning efforts and support efforts decrease sedimentation, and /wetland. to continue improving the science. attenuate flood waters. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A The Washoe community will be considerations. consulted. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A This project will create a new ADA interpretive/educational trail. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Healthy meadows retain water and climate change3. promote late season flows. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Healthy meadows sequester carbon. emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F%o- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local t— Yes 1v No -- System Reoperation r- Yes P No -- Water Transfers r Yes r%-0 No -- Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes F,/_ No -- Desalination r Yes F,/_ No -- Precipitation Enhancement Yes FV_ No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes FV_ No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local !"' Yes F%o- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and !`"' Yes F%o No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation Yes r No Healthy meadows retain water and promote late season flows. Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F%O- No -- Pollution Prevention Yes F_ No Stabilizing the meadows will reduce sedimentation. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes FV_ No -- Urban Runoff Management Yes F%o No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r- Yes Wo No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F- Yes FV_ No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F_ No Project will restore and help stabilize a 114 acres of meadow/wetland. Forest Management Yes F%O- No -- Land Use Planning and Management W Yes r No Will help manage sustainable recreation in Grover Hot Springs State Park. Recharge Areas Protection W Yes r No Project will restore and help stabilize a 114 acres of meadow/wetland. Water-dependent Recreation FV_ Yes F No Will improve fishing along Hot Springs Creek Watershed Management FV_ Yes F No Project will restore and help stabilize a 114 acres of meadow/wetland. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management tv— Yes r No Healthy meadows retain water and promote late season flows. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 351000 $$- 276000 627000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and 5,000 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P/ Yes i— No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 160000 5000 Design, CEQA, Surveys, Permits, Pre Monitoring, Education Design, Outreach, Admin Phase 2 378000 5000 ADA Trail Construction, Road to Trail Conversion, Trail Removal,Waysides, Volunteer Events,Weed Control along trails, Admin Phase 3 28000 5000 Post Monitoring,Wayside Installations,Adaptive Site Managment, Admin Phase 4 10000 5000 Post Monitoring,Admin Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding California State $276,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Parks ADA e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Grover Hot Springs State Park is operated by will be financed for the 25-year planning California State Parks. After restoration activities period for project implementation (not grant California State Parks will continue to maintain and funded). manage the site. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Conceptual Planning,with California State Park cost planning, bid, etc.) calculators. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes 15,71 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Trails will continue compact,divert water,erode the project is not funded. (300 words or less) meadow. Social trails will continue to be a vector for weeds. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F_ Yes The Alpine Watershed 8/1/2013 2/1/2016 Evaluation P/ FV_ No Group and California State Parks are working F_ N/A on conceptual design and scope. Along with monitoring design and cost analysis. b. Final Design F_ Yes California State Parks will 1/1/2016 6/1/2016 F- F%O- No complete the final design. The Alpine F_ N/A Watershed Group will help with public comment and outreach. c. Environmental r Yes Archeological, plant and 4/1/2016 10/1/2016 Documentation �— W No wildlife surveys will be (CEQA/NEPA) completed. State Parks N/A will complete CEQA. d. Permitting r Yes The Alpine Watershed 9/1/2016 1/1/2017 r W No Group will complete permitting. N/A e. Construction r Yes California State Parks will 1/1/2017 7/1/2017 Contracting W No complete manage contracting and grants. r N/A Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. Construction Yes California State Parks will 7/1/2017 9/1/2019 Implementation �— No supervise construction and contract crew. Alpine N/A Watershed Group will manage volunteers, monitoring, and educational waysides and events. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Project is consistent with State Park project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Natural Resource Management Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Goals. Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the GIS mapping of roads,trails and feasibility of this project weeds has been completed. Planning has been initiated with California Sate Parks ADA section. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Poorly constructed trails and social research has been conducted) of the proposed project in trails have been shown to compact 300 words or less. soils, while de watering and eroding meadows. State Parks has implemented many meadow restoration projects in other units. A nearly identical, successful project was completed at Ward State Park to reduce impacts from trails on meadows. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes 7 No r%_0 N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No FV_ N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes No PO N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No %0 N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No %0 N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the Yes No %0 N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Friends of Squaw Creek Name of Primary Contact Ed Heneveld Name of Secondary Contact Mike Liquori Mailing Address Post Office Box 2488, Olympic Valley, CA 96146 E-mail doced@att.net (Ed Heneveld), mike@soundwatershed.com (Mike Liquori) Phone (###)###-#### 530-583-1817 (Ed); 510-927-2099 (Mike) Other Cooperating Sound Watershed Consulting, Placer County Planning Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Department,The Truckee River Watershed Council,The Sierra Nevada Conservancy, The Resort at Squaw Creek, Squaw Valley Ski Corp,The Poulsen Family, Squaw Valley Public Services District, Lahontan Region Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Lower Squaw Creek Restoration Project, Oylmpic Valley, CA Project Category r Restoration F Storm Water/Flood Control Iry Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The Squaw Creek Restoration Preliminary Design Project will improve (Briefly describe the project, in water quality and aquatic habitat by restoring critical hydrologic, 300 words or less) geomorphic and ecological functions and processes to develop an integrated solution for approximately 1.8 miles of Squaw Creek. The stream and meadow have been negatively impacted by past land-use and channel modifications. The project will build on existing conceptual designs to restore the channel functions to its natural condition by reconnecting relict channels, improving channel alignment, improving connectivity between the creek and floodplain; increasing water storage capacity through ponds,wetlands and floodplain storage; addressing bank erosion and failing rip-rap with biotechnical stabilization features; and developing instream aquatic habitat enhancements. Total number of projects 1 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes,TMDL(existing) and possible collaboration with adjacent a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, landowner redevelopment projects (currently in planning phases) EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related Existing MOU among riparian landowners forms the basis for the MOUs, agreements or TACs Friends of Squaw Creek. Other collaborators have also expressed Tahoe Sierra IRWM currently in place. continued support over many years and multiple phases of funding. Project Location: Latitude: 39.21167 Longitude: -120.19860 Project Location Description Squaw Creek is located in eastern Placer County, in Squaw Valley (e.g., along the south bank of (Olympic Valley), California. Squaw Creek is a small (approximately stream/river between river 8.2 square mile [21.1 km2]); subalpine and alpine watershed located miles or miles from about six miles (9.6 km) northwest of Lake Tahoe, California between Towns/intersection and/or the towns of Tahoe City and Truckee.The mainstem channel is address): divided into north and south subwatersheds. The project location covers the South Fork of Squaw Creek extending 1,300 ft upstream from the confluence,the North Fork extending 1,400 ft upstream from the confluence and Lower Squaw Creek, extending 11,200 ft downstream from the confluence to the Squaw Valley Road Bridge. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL 1)Will address sediment from standards in accordance with the r- Yes alluvial sources (bed and attainment date, and participate in F_ N/A bank erosion), representing the development of future TMDLs. -11%of the total allocated load, and will improve the receiving creek so that identified upslope sediment supply will have a reduced negative impairment on both water quality and habitat functions. WQ2-Reduce pollutant loads by numerous such features are -- implementing measures such as F,,- Yes identified in preliminary stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ N/A design plans. Additional control/restoration to meet Water features will be added as Quality Objectives (WQOs)for funding becomes available receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality existing monitoring includes -- monitoring programs through r Yes flow gauges at 3 locations, planning horizon, and coordinate F_ N/A water quality monitoring annually throughout the Region. (LRWQCB),groundwater monitoring and others WQ4- Ensure that drinking water as conducted by water supply -- supplied by public water systems r Yes organizations, including continues to meet Federal and State F N/A SVPSD and others standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, improved floodplain -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r- Yes connectivity will improve to re-establish natural water filtering F_ N/A filtration, water supply processes. availability and overall water quality WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or as affected by existing -- replace infrastructure to reliably r- Yes stream-aquifer dynamics in supply water. F N/A targeted restoration reaches WS3 - Implement and promote water public engagement is a key -- conservation measures and practices F Yes component of the project to meet state goals. F N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor Yes existing groundwater wells -- groundwater supply to assure future are being monitored by reliability. F N/A SVPSD GWM2 - Promote groundwater thru public outreach, signage, -- protection activities for high quality F Yes engagement during groundwater, and advocate for F N/A restoration activities, improvements to impacted creek/floodplain Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) groundwater quality through public connectivity, and others education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for integrated restoration -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes strategies with existing water municipal/industrial/agricultural F N/A supply infrastructure supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water the primary goal of the -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes project; restoration actions associated uplands to support healthy F N/A identified for riparian, ponds, watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife wetland, creek and floodplain and plant habitats. environments ER2 - Develop and implement current activities include -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes annual weed removal existing invasive species and F N/A activities (volunteer basis) colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with meadow forms a natural fire -- public and private landowners, F Yes break. Restoration will activities to manage forest health and F N/A reduce conifer enroachment wildfire risks. to retain this break function ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes collaborating with adjacent -- caused by existing and new developers and Placer County development. F N/A to integrate design components compatible with this goal IWM1 -Conduct local and regional design is strongly grounded -- water-related planning activities F Yes in scientific studies. within the planning horizon as F N/A Continued monitoring and supported by current and future integrated adaptive watershed science. management will support scientific objectives IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among FOSC collabation currently -- multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes involves over 12 agencies, Region for information exchange. F N/A landowners, and supporting organizations Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and via public engagement -- awareness of watershed functions, r- Yes (Truckee River Days), signage, protection and restoration needs to F N/A volunteer engagement in encourage stewardship by the public. data collection, project website, etc. IWM4- Promote activities that primary objective of the -- reduce flood risk. R- Yes restoration design F N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. project will improve overall -- water quality,water supply, r Yes resiliency in face of climate groundwater recharge,flood F N/A change, especially with management) in local and regional regard to changes in rain-on- planning efforts and support efforts snow and flood frequency to continue improving the science. dynamics IWM6- Monitor water storage, project includes 3 existing -- release and exchange activities in r Yes stream gauge stations order to improve coordination with F N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community T' N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F- N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F- N/A improved resiliency(ecological, climate change3. flooding, social) e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F Yes F No -- System Reoperation r Yes No -- Water Transfers r Yes F No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater I✓ Yes F- No in collaboration with SVPSD Desalination r- Yes No -- Precipitation Enhancement r" Yes No -- Recycled Municipal Water F Yes r No stormwater return to floodplain Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes f No wetlands and pond storage Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F No No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes Fv- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Pollution Prevention Fv- Yes r No stormwater LID Salt and Salinity Management r Yes No -- Urban Runoff Management FO- Yes F_ No integrated urban stormwater design Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship ru Yes F*I- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants,and ru Yes F No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F-1 Yes F No primary objective Forest Management r" Yes P_ No -- Land Use Planning and Management I✓ Yes r No -- Recharge Areas Protection r� Yes F_ No -- Water-dependent Recreation R Yes F No fishing, skiing, hiking, birding, etc Watershed Management r Yes 7 No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes F No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1400000 $$-TBD TBD 1400000 OR F DAC 2. Annual Operations and - Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes F_ No Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 200000- - Design 300000 Phase 2 50 to 150K - Environmental Documentation Phase 3 1000000 - Construction Phase 4 0 - -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project several in $- cost development d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding KSL Development, $TBD and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Resort @ Squaw Ck Phase 2, Community Benefit Fund, Placer County In-Kind, Others e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs A community Development Fund has been in will be financed for the 25-year planning discussions that would provide long-term O&M period for project implementation (not grant costs. This fund was floated by several landowners funded). pending various improvements that have not yet been implemented. Other sources may include some inkind support from Placer County f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, conceptual planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? j- Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if continued channel incision and bank instability has the project is not funded. (300 words or less) been documented generating tousands of tons of sediment annually. The watershed continues to be a major producer of sediment to the Truckee River Watershed. Channel incision is further disconnecting the floodplain and we are beginning to see greater conifer encroachment into the meadow and many meadow wetland areas are becoming more xyric. Fisheries habitat and water quality are continuing to decline. Socially,the limited progress over at least a decade of effort is causing a sense of exhaustion. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2, Implementation Grants: Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement,Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation, Construction/Implementation, Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes numerous technical 9/1/2005 1/1/2007 Evaluation 7 No No studies and monitoring (ongoing), diagnosis and f N/A alternatives development b. Final Design r Yes preliminary design phase 1/1/2007 -- No completed (25%) in 2013 Cf N/A c. Environmental r Yes Initial Study conducted. -- -- Documentation Fv No Seeking mitigated (CECI.A/NEPA) negative declaration r- N/A (pending funding) d. Permitting r Yes -- -- -- 7 r No 7 N/A e. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Contracting No N/A f. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Implementation r .7, No F_ N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is seeking to initiate environmental documentation simultaneous to final checked as current status design phase Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Squaw Ck TMDL project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the numerous documents provided feasibility of this project online at http://www.friendsofsquawcreek.or g/document-library.html c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much considerable scientific study has research has been conducted)of the proposed project in been completed over the last 15 300 words or less. years including hydrology, fish habitat, geomorphology, bank stability inventories, hydraulic modeling, detailed topographic surveys (2005 and 2011), stream/aquifer interaction studies, groundwater monitoring, water quality monitoring, streamflow monitoring, and others. Much of this research has also been peer reviewed by technical advisory groups, and there have been at least 15 public meetings and scientific review meetings. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. r Yes F- No F- N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe LID and green stormwater e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F- Yes No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes F- No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F- Yes F- No W N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F- Yes F- No R- N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No R- N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the r Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization California Tahoe Conservancy Name of Primary Contact Joe Pepi Name of Secondary Contact Scott Carroll Mailing Address 1061 Third Street, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail jpepi@tahoe.ca.gov Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6066 Other Cooperating US Bureau of Reclamation, Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Upper Truckee River and Marsh Restorations Project Category fir Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The California Tahoe Conservancy(Conservancy), Bureau of (Briefly describe the project, in Reclamation (Reclamation), and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency 300 words or less) (TRPA) are pursuing a restoration project along the most downstream reach of the Upper Truckee River(UTRM), at the mouth of Lake Tahoe.The UTRM Restoration Project is identified in TRPA's Environmental Improvement Program (EIP) as a project that is necessary to restore and maintain environmental thresholds, including water quality for the Lake Tahoe Basin.The 592-acre study area is located in South Lake Tahoe, California, It consists of parcels owned by the Conservancy and private landowners. The primary purpose of the UTRM Restoration Project is to restore natural geomorphic processes and ecological functions along this reach of river while providing recreation access. The project will reconnect the UTR to the wetlands and floodplains and so remove sediment and other suspended particles by allowing sediment-laden water to pass through densely vegetated floodplains and wetlands. Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 of 2 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Project is part of the the Lake Tahoe EIP. Project is identified in a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, TRPA's Environmental Improvement Program (EIP), (EIP Project#s EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so 560, 650, 981, and 1002) as a project that is necessary to restore and provide description. maintain environmental thresholds for the Tahoe Basin. EIP projects are designed to achieve and maintain environmental threshold carrying capacities that protect the Tahoe Basin's unique and valued resources. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Political Support—List related There is a technical advisory committee for the project made up of MOUs, agreements or TACs representatives from local, state, and federal agencies. In addition, currently in place. the project receives input and review from the Upper Truckee River Watershed Advisory Group. Project Location: Latitude: 38.93438 Longitude: -119.99559 Project Location Description The project is located along the most downstream reach of the Upper (e.g., along the south bank of Truckee River next to Lake Tahoe, within the City of South Lake stream/river between river Tahoe.The study area for the project is generally bounded by U.S. miles or miles from Highway 50 and Highland Woods Drive on the south,the El Dorado Towns/intersection and/or Street on the east, and Tahoe Keys Boulevard on the west and Lake address): Tahoe to the north. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Tahoe TMDL identified 400 acres of standards in accordance with the r Yes fine sediment as one of the wetlands will be attainment date, and participate in r N/A major pollutant sources. This restored and the development of future TMDLs. project will help meet enhanced by this approved TMDL standards project. 12,000 for that source by reducing linear feet of stream bank erosion and stream channel reestablishing a connection restored/ between the UTR and it's enhanced. historic floodplain allowing for over-banking and fine sediment deposition during spring flow events. Project Template Page 2 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The Upper Truckee River was 400 acres of implementing measures such as r Yes channelized and relocated, wetlands will be stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A became deeply incised, restored and control/restoration to meet Water exposing it's stream banks to enhanced by this Quality Objectives (WQOs)for increased erosive force and project. receiving water bodies established in disconnecting it from a large the Basin Plan within the planning portion of the it's floodplain, horizon. reducing deposition of sediment and nutrient uptake from streamflows. The water quality of the lake can be improved by reducing bank erosion and reconnecting the UTR flows to it's floodplains. WQ3 - Implement water quality A monitoring plan was 10-20+years of monitoring programs through r Yes developed for the project in monitoring data, planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A 2008 to characterize analysis, and annually throughout the Region. baseline conditions,track reporting project performance in relation to desired outcomes, to monitor for water quality regulatory requirements and establish tentative approaches to direct adaptive management through final design, construction and post construction. The plan will be updated as the project moves forward.lt is consistent with guidance on monitoring plans for the Upper Truckee River developed by the Upper Truckee River Watershed Advisory Group, and data and results will be shared to assist in regional efforts. Project Template Page 3 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Restoration of the Upper 400 acres of wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes Truckee Marsh through floodplain will be to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A channel modifications will restored and processes. reduce bank erosion and enhanced by this result in more frequent project. inundation of the floodplain. This will re-establish the natural ability for the marsh to filter runoff and remove sediment and nutrients. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. I;_7 N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future r Yes reliability. Fv N/A Project Template Page 4 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Fv N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The restoration of riparian 400 acres of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes areas and wetlands of the wetlands will be associated uplands to support healthy r N/A Upper Truckee Marsh (UTM) restored and watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife is important for wildlife, enhanced by this and plant habitats. because the UTM provides project. moisture and cool, shaded micro-climates, and it's importance for wildlife is disproportionate to it's areal extent.The UTM is the largest remaining wetland area in the Tahoe Basin and one of five marshes in the basin designated as an Ecologically Sensitive Area due to it's size, uniqueness, and potential for supporting high levels of biodiversity. ER2 - Develop and implement This project requires ongoing 500 acres programs to prevent the spread of W Yes surveys of invasive species to regularly existing invasive species and r N/A ensure no spread or surveyed for colonization of potential future colonization in these invasive species. invasive species. sensitive areas. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. Project Template Page 5 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes The UTM is the largest 400 acres of caused by existing and new remaining wetland in the wetlands will be development. F N/A Tahoe Basin and one of five restored and marshes in the basin enhanced by this designated as an Ecologically project. Sensitive Area and supports high levels of biodiversity. This project has great potential to replace habitat lost elsewhere and maintain habitat diversity that may be lost through future development. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Past actions have created the -- water-related planning activities r Yes need to restore river and within the planning horizon as r N/A floodplain ecosystems in the supported by current and future Tahoe Basin to improve the watershed science. clarity of Lake Tahoe, and the ecological functions of riparian, wetland, and floodplain ecosystems, including the provision of wildlife habitat. Studies over the last 3 decades suggest that the reduction in water clarity of Lake Tahoe is correlated with the delivery of fine sediments from various watersheds in the basin and increased phytoplankton productivity. Project Template Page 6 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Regional collaboration is -- multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes achieved through the Upper Region for information exchange. r N/A Truckee River Watershed Advisory Group which is made up of representatives of local, state, and federal agencies involved in restoration projects in the watershed and meets quarterly. In addition the Conservancy is a participant with other local and regional agencies in the Tahoe Sierra IRWM. IWM3 - Increase public education and The Conservancy has had a Daily summer awareness of watershed functions, r Yes summertime land steward on interactions with protection and restoration needs to r N/A the property for the last ten users of the encourage stewardship by the public. years that provides project site, signs information to the public installed, public about the sensitivity and meetings to importance of the resources educate residents present at the UTM. In and visitors. addition there is signage present around the site which provides information to the public on the resources present and how to protect them. The Conservancy will increase public education for this project as it moves forward through the final environmental document, final design, construction and post construction phases. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes F%' N/A Project Template Page 7 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The designs of the project 400 acres of water quality,water supply, r Yes alternatives have been wetlands will be groundwater recharge,flood r N/A guided by historic data sets restored and management) in local and regional and by current field enhanced, and planning efforts and support efforts conditions that reflect decades of to continue improving the science. historic geomorphic monitoring will adjustments to natural support science. factors and human disturbance. By replicating the natural processes and functions the project expects to create a system that will be resilient to climate change as it occurs. Monitoring of the site will support efforts to improve scientific understanding of wetlands and their role in mitigating climate change. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 8 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community N/A There has been extensive considerations. collaboration with the Cultural Resource Staff of the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California to identify cultural resources within the project area and through the development of a cultural resource protection plan before construction begins, a commitment has been made to see that these resources are protected. Measures will include oversight of grading in known resource areas and training of project construction personnel on the possibility of encountering significant resources; if such resources were encountered, proper measures would be taken to protect them. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. N/A The City of South Lake Tahoe is a disadvantaged community, as it has a median household income and per capita income low enough to qualify for this designation. The city's median income was$34,707 and its per capita income was$18,452, compared to a median income of$51,484 and a per capita income of$25,560 for the county. Approximately 12.5 percent of city residents were below poverty level, and 7.1 percent of county residents were below poverty Ievel.The Project will benefit this disadvantaged community by improving water quality and the Clarity of Lake Tahoe,which has widely been recognized as essential for the economy of South Lake Tahoe. Benefits to wildlife, vegetation, and scenic resources, as a result of the Project, is also anticipated to benefit the economy of South Lake Tahoe.South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County.The city's median household income and per capita income were lower than those of the Project Template Page 9 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM county.The city's median income was $34,707 and its per capita income was $18,452, compared to a median income of$51,484 and a per capita income of$25,560 for the county. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r NSA No minority and low-income populations exceed 50 percent in South Lake Tahoe or El Dorado County.The city's slightly higher poverty rate is not meaningfully greater than the county's rate, and both the city and county poverty rates are proportionally less than the statewide rate of 18.6 percent. Therefore, no disproportionately high and adverse impacts on minority or low-income populations would occur. d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A The central estimate for temperature climate change3. and precipitation changes indicate a warming of 2 degrees Celsius (°C) and a 10 percent decrease in total precipitation by mid-century. By creating a shallower and smaller channel this project will allow over- banking at the decreased stream flows likely to result from climate and as a result better maintain improved groundwater elevations,wet meadow plant communities and the fish and wildlife habitats better than the existing stream channel condition. These improved conditions will assist by mitigating the effects of climate change while also providing a more resilient system. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r NSA Relatively minor operation-related emissions (e.g.green technology). GHG emissions would be generated by area and mobile sources during the life of the project.Area-source GHG emissions would be associated with maintenance largely related to maintaining public access infrastructure, waste disposal, and other miscellaneous activities. Existing maintenance programs would continue as they do today. The project would not involve municipal water use; therefore, implementing the project would not generate off- site GHG emissions associated with water conveyance,treatment, and Project Template Page 10 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM consumption. Quantification of sequestration of carbon by vegetation is challenging due to limited understanding of sequestration rates. Nonetheless, it was assumed that carbon sequestration would improve slightly because the site would result in improved natural vegetation, and some changes in vegetation type would likely reduce sequestration rates in small areas(e.g., where Jeffrey pine forest would be replaced with other vegetation), other changes in vegetation type in large areas would likely increase carbon sequestration rates (e.g., conversion of montane meadow to willow-scrub). Mobile- source GHG emissions would be generated by the slight increase in project-related vehicle trips associated with the improvements to public access infrastructure in the study area attracting some additional visitors. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency Yes r No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r- Yes Po No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Project Template Page 11 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Conveyance- Regional/local Yes FV- No -- System Reoperation Yes F%O- No -- Water Transfers Yes F%o- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes F%O- No -- Desalination r Yes F%o- No -- Precipitation Enhancement Yes F%O- No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes F%O- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local !"' Yes F%o- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and P Yes F No The project will reduce input of Distribution sediment and nutrients to Lake Tahoe which is a source of drinking water to parts of the Tahoe Basin. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation Yes F%o- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F%o No -- Pollution Prevention FV- Yes F No Project will reduce stream bank erosion which is a source of sediment pollution to Lake Tahoe.The restored floodplain will remove several types of pollution, including sediment, nutrients, and other pollutants found in urban runoff waters. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F%O- No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes F No The project will increase the capacity of the Upper Truckee Marsh to remove sediment from urban runoff discharging to the Upper Truckee River through the reconnection of the floodplain an re-establishment of the natural filtering processes. Depressions and natural basins may be constructed in opportunistic locations to maximize treatment of urban runoff. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes F%O- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes FV- No -- Water Pricing) Project Template Page 12 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Ecosystem Restoration Fv Yes F_ No This project will employ the Sustainability RMS by creating a new channel that is shallower and smaller allowing for better connection of the Upper Truckee River and it's floodplain which will facilitate over-banking of average flows,thus raising of seasonal groundwater, improve wetland plant wildlife and fisheries habitats compared to the current incised and over-widened channel and it's resulting impaired condition. Under the new condition the project will create conditions which will be more resilient in maintaining these improved conditions in response to the predicted decrease in stream flows resulting from climate change. Forest Management r" Yes Po No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes FV_ No -- Recharge Areas Protection W Yes F_ No In the vicinity of the UTRM there are a number of water supply wells which will benefit from the retention of additional surface water being spread over and retained within the marsh. Water-dependent Recreation r Yes F_ No Project improvements to water quality will improve the recreational experience for users of Lake Tahoe by improving Lake quality and clarity conditions.The channel of the UTR is used by boaters as they travel between the river and Lake Tahoe.The project has the potential to improve the quality and extend the duration of the boating season. In addition it has the potential to improve wildlife and fisheries habitats enhancing meadow dependent species birding and fishing opportunities. Watershed Management F%-o Yes f- No As the project is one of the largest in the watershed it will have benefits that improve the water quality to a greater extent than any other project within the watershed. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management I— Yes FV_ No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Project Template Page 13 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Other RMS addressed and explanation: V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 3880000 $$1,000,000 1000000 5880000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 30000 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? ;�/ Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 1472000 5000 Year 1 construction activities would commence with mobilization activities that would take up to 1 month to complete.These mobilization activities would include constructing staging areas and haul roads, installing BMPs and placing signage.The initial and primary staging areas for this period would be the California Avenue, Lower Westside, and Sailing Lagoon staging areas. Expected activities would include delivery and storage of construction equipment and materials and worker parking. Public road access to these staging areas would be from Tahoe Keys Boulevard to California or Washington Avenues or East Venice Drive. All Project Template Page 14 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM construction equipment and haul trucks would be operated on internal haul roads. Subsequent activities would include much of the earthwork required for the river and floodplain excavation: recontouring existing channels, lowering the floodplain, modifying the existing secondary channel, constructing the new channel, and lowering the floodplain. Most of these activities would take a month or less to complete, except for new- channel construction. Significant excavation and soil movement activities would occur on site in Year 1.The volume of soil excavated would be in the range of 32,000; and 253,000 cubic yards. Excavated material would be either stockpiled on site. During construction of new and recontoured channels, it is possible that de- watering of excavations (i.e., removal of collected water) may be required. Phase 2 1472000 10000 During Year 2,work would continue on new and modified sections of river channel. Bank protection would be constructed on both sides of the channel, and may include vertical grade controls and construction of overflow culverts under U.S. 50 through the embankment fill. Throughout the construction season,the revegetation treatments that were conducted during Project Template Page 15 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Year 1 would be irrigated and inspected. Phase 3 1472000 10000 Except for mobilization, revegetation, irrigation, and project shutdown during Year 4, project construction would be completed during Year 3. Year 3 would also include continued inspection and irrigation of revegetation treatments that were installed in Years 1 and 2. Phase 4 1472000 5000 Construction activities in Year 4 would consist of mobilization and maintenance of roadway and staging areas, revegetation and irrigation, winterization, and project shutdown. Although some ground disturbance would be associated with these activities, cut and fill of materials would not be substantial. All work in Year 4 would utilize either the East Venice Drive(west) or Bellevue (east)staging areas. Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project California Tahoe $1,602,000 cost Conservancy US Bureau of ReclamationUS Bureau of Reclamation/SNPLM A d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding State of California $2,000,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Bond FundsUS Bureau of Reclamation Wetland Development Funds e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The current operation and maintenance activities in will be financed for the 25-year planning this project area are funded under the California Project Template Page 16 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM period for project implementation (not grant Tahoe Conservancy's annual support budget. Once funded). this project has been completed,the post project operation and maintenance costs will be funded by the same funding source. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, An engineers estimate for the project based on a planning, bid, etc.) 30%design was developed by the project design engineer. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes V No h.Please describe what impact there may be if If the Project is not funded it would likely not be the project is not funded. (300 words or less) constructed, and the Upper Truckee River would continue to respond to past disturbances, resulting in continued stream bank erosion and reduced floodplain filtration processes.The progressive geomorphic adjustment along the Upper Truckee River would occur primarily in the form of streambank erosion and widening,followed by streambed deposition in some upstream reaches. Simulations of future channel adjustments performed for the TMDL studies (Simon et al. 2003) estimate channel width and streambed elevation for the Upper Truckee River over a 50-year period (Exhibit 3.9-15).These data suggest that bank erosion and channel widening would progress rapidly over the next decade in some reaches (e.g., 5 kilometers upstream of the river's mouth) and slowly for decades in other areas (e.g., 7 kilometers upstream).The magnitude of channel widening may be substantial,with estimates ranging from several feet in most areas to more than 20 feet in some locations. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 17 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes Development of the 3/1/2000 11/1/2008 Evaluation I;_OT r No Upper Truckee River and Marsh Restoration [— N/A Project has proceeded through a sequence of several planning stages. Initially, the Conservancy defined project objectives and desired outcomes to direct the restoration planning process.The Conservancy evaluated and documented the existing natural processes and functions in the study area to begin the formulation and evaluation of alternative plans.This evaluation enabled the identification of potential restoration opportunities and constraints. With detailed information about the river and marsh processes and ecological functions,the Conservancy hosted a design charrette (i.e., interactive workshop) for agencies and other stakeholders to identify the spectrum of potentially feasible restoration ideas to be considered in the development of concept Project Template Page 18 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM plan alternatives. Four alternative concept plans, all developed to be potentially feasible,were formulated to represent a reasonable range of restoration approaches and levels of public access and recreation facilities. These concepts were refined through hydrologic modeling, regulatory agency review, development of schematic designs, and monitoring. After refinement,the four concepts generated by this extensive planning process became the four action alternatives being evaluated in the environmental document. b. Final Design I-- Yes TBD -- -- F- W No F N/A c. Environmental F- Yes As result of an extensive 1/1/2009 12/1/2014 Documentation FV F%O- No planning process four (CEQA/NEPA) action alternatives were F- N/A generated and are being evaluated along with the No-Project/No-Action Alternative in the DEIR/DEIS/DEIS during 2013. A preferred alternative has not yet been identified. It will be selected in 2014 now that the public has reviewed the five alternatives and provided public comments on the Project Template Page 19 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM DEIR/DEIS/DEIS.The preferred alternative may be one of the five evaluated in the DEIR/DEIS/DEIS, or it may involve a combination of features presented in those alternatives.The completion and adoption of the final environmental document is planned late fall 2014. d. Permitting Yes TBD -- -- r ry No N/A e. Construction Yes TBD -- -- Contracting r No N/A f. Construction 1— Yes TBD -- -- Implementation F W No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 20 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the California Water Boards and Nevada Division of proposed project is consistent with or Environmental Protection. 2007 (September). supported by(e.g.General Plans, UWMPs, Lake TahoeTMDL Pollutant Reduction GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Opportunity Report.Volume 1.01. Sacramento, Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) CA, and Carson City, NV. Goldman, C. R. 1988. Primary Productivity, Nutrients, and Transparency during the Early Onset of Eutrophication inUltra-oligotrophic Lake Tahoe, California-Nevada. Limnology and Oceanography 33(6,part 1):1321-1333.Kondolf, G. M., R. Kattelman, M. Embury, and D. C. Erman. 1996. Status of Riparian Habitat. Pages 1009-1030 in Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress,Vol. II,Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options. Davis: University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources.Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board. 1995. Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region. South Lake Tahoe, CA.Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board and University of California, Davis. 2007 (February). Watershed Hydrologic Modeling and Sediment and Nutrient Loading Estimation for the Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load. Prepared by Tetra Tech. Lahontan RWQCB. Lahontan RWQCB and UCD. Davis.Manley, P. N., and M. D. Schlesinger. 2001 (April). Riparian Biological Diversity in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Final report for the California Tahoe Conservancy and the U.S. Forest Service. South Lake Tahoe, CA.Murphy, D. D., and C. M. Knopp (eds.). 2000. Lake Tahoe Watershed Assessment. General Technical ReportPSW-GTR-175. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, U.S. Forest Service.Reuter,J. R., and W. W. Miller. 2000. Aquatic Resources, Water Quality and Limnology of Lake Tahoe and Its Tributaries. Simon,A. 2006 (June 28). Estimates of Fine-Sediment Loadings to Lake Tahoe from Channel and WatershedSources. USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory Technical Report No. Project Template Page 21 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 52. Prepared for theUniversity of California, Davis; the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; and the LahontanRegional Water Quality Control Board. Simon, A., E. Langendoen, R. Bingner, R. Wells, A. Heins, N. Jokay, and L.Jaramillo. 2003. Lake Tahoe Basin Framework Implementation Study: Sediment Loadings and Channel Erosion. Prepared for the U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers. Prepared by the USDA Agricultural Research Service, National Sedimentation Laboratory. Washington, DC. California Tahoe Conservancy and California Department of General Services, Real Estate Services Division. 2003b. Upper Truckee River and Wetland Restoration Project Processes and Functions of the UpperTruckee Marsh. South Lake Tahoe and Sacramento, CA. Prepared by EDAW (now AECOM), Stateline,NV, and ENTRIX, Sacramento, CA.---. 2006. Upper Truckee River and Wetland Restoration Project Final Concept Plan Report. South Lake Tahoe and Sacramento, CA. Prepared by EDAW (now AECOM), Stateline, NV, and ENTRIX,Sacramento, CA.Tahoe Yellow Cress Management Plan Upper Truckee River and Marsh Restoration Project. 2008. Upper Truckee River and Marsh Restoration Project Monitoring Plan. South Lake Tahoe and West Sacramento, CA. Prepared by EDAW (now AECOM), South Lake Tahoe, CA; ENTRIX,Sacramento, CA; and Valley& Mountain Consultants, South Lake Tahoe, CA. South Lake Tahoe and West Sacramento, CA. Prepared by EDAW (now AECOM), South Lake Tahoe, CA. AECOM. 2011. 2011 Willow Flycatcher and Shorebird Surveys at the Upper Truckee Marsh, South Lake Tahoe,California. Draft memorandum submitted to California Tahoe Conservancy December 21, 2011. Borgmann, K. L., and M. L. Morrison. 2004. Wildlife Inventory and Monitoring in the Lake Tahoe Basin, California: Pre-Restoration. A report to the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, U.S. Forest Service, South Lake Tahoe, CA. California Tahoe Conservancy. 1997. Upper Truckee River& Project Template Page 22 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Wetlands Restoration Project, Conceptual Design Report. South Lake Tahoe, CA. Prepared by Global Environmental, Sacramento, CA.--- . 2001. Upper Truckee Marsh: Evaluation of Sensitive Resources. South Lake Tahoe, CA. -- -. 2002. Unpublished data for surveys at the Upper Truckee Marsh, 2002. Victor Insera, wildlife biologist.South Lake Tahoe, CA. California Tahoe Conservancy and California Department of General Services, Real Estate Services Division.2003. Upper Truckee River and Wetland Restoration Project: Processes and Functions of the UpperTruckee Marsh. South Lake Tahoe and Sacramento, CA. Prepared by EDAW and ENTRIX.---. 2006a. Upper Truckee River and Wetland Restoration Project. Final Concept Plan Report. South Lake Tahoe and West Sacramento, CA. Prepared by EDAW, South Lake Tahoe, CA, and ENTRIX,Sacramento, CA.Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. 1981. Volume I: Water Quality Management Plan. Available:<http://www.trpa.org/documents/doc dwnlds/208_Vol_I.pdf>. Accessed August 15, 2008. b. List technical reports and studies supporting 2007a (November 2007). Upper Truckee River the feasibility of this project and Marsh Restoration Project Schematic Design Plans &Details. South Lake Tahoe and West Sacramento, CA. Prepared by ENTRIX, Sacramento, CA, andEDAW (now AECOM), South Lake Tahoe, CA. 2007b.AECOM. 2011. 2011 Willow Flycatcher and Shorebird Surveys at the Upper Truckee Marsh, South Lake Tahoe, California. Draft memorandum submitted to California Tahoe Conservancy December 21, 2011.Borgmann, K. L., and M. L. Morrison. 2004. Wildlife Inventory and Monitoring in the Lake Tahoe Basin,California: Pre-Restoration. A report to the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, U.S. Forest Service,South Lake Tahoe, CA.Elliott-Fisk, D. L,T. C. Cahill, O. K. Davis, L. Duan, C. R. Goldman, G. E. Gruell, R. Harris, R. Kattelmann, R.Lacey, D. Leisz, S. Lindstrom, D. Machida, R.A. Rowntree, P. Rucks, D.A. Sharkey, S. L. Stephens,and D. S.Ziegler. 1997. Lake Tahoe Project Template Page 23 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Case Study. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project. Addendum. Davis:University of California, Davis, Center for Water and Wildland Resources.Manley, P. N., and M. D. Schlesinger. 2001. Riparian Biological Diversity in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Final reportfor the California Tahoe Conservancy and the U.S. Forest Service. Pavlik, B., D. Murphy, and the Tahoe Yellow Cress Technical Advisory Group. 2002. Conservation Strategy forTahoe Yellow Cress (Rorippa subumbellata). Stateline, NV:Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. Western Botanical Services. 1995. Baseline Botanical Study for the Upper Truckee River and WetlandRestoration Project. Reno, NV. Prepared for Global Environmental and the California TahoeConservancy.---. 1999. Botanical Survey for the Upper Truckee River and Wetland Restoration Project. Reno, NV.Prepared for EDAW and California Tahoe Conservancy.Roberts, D., and J. Reuter. 2007 (September). Draft Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load Technical Report.Prepared for Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board and Nevada Division of Environmental Protection.Rowe,T. G., and K. K. Allander. 2000. Surface-and Ground-Water Characteristics in the Upper Truckee Riverand Trout Creek Watersheds, South Lake Tahoe, California and Nevada,July—December 1996. Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4001. U.S. Geological Survey.Rowe,T. G., D. K. Saleh, S. A. Watkins, and C. R. Kratzer. 2002. Streamflow and Water-Quality Data for Selected Watersheds in the Lake Tahoe Basin, California and Nevada, through September 1998. U.S.Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 02-4030, Carson City, NV.Tetra Tech. 2007. Watershed Hydrology Modeling and Sediment and Nutrient Loading Estimation for the Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load. Revised. Prepared for Lahontan Regional Water Quality ControlBoard, South Lake Tahoe, CA, and University of California, Davis, CA.Adams, K. D., and T. B. Minor. 2001 (February). Historic Shoreline Project Template Page 24 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Change at Lake Tahoe from 1938 to 1998: Implications for Water Clarity. Prepared for Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.---. 2002. Historic Shoreline Change at Lake Tahoe from 1938 to 1998 and Its Impact on Sediment anclNutrient Loading.Journal of Coastal Research 18(4):637-651. California Tahoe Conservancy and California Department of General Services. 2003. Upper Truckee River and Wetland Restoration Project Processes and Functions of the Upper Truckee Marsh. South Lake Tahoeand Sacramento, CA. Prepared by EDAW, Stateline, NV, and ENTRIX, Sacramento, CA.Simon, A. 2006 (May). Estimates of Fine- Sediment Loadings to Lake Tahoe from Channel and WatershedSources. U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, National SedimentationLaboratory Technical Report 52. Prepared for University of California, Davis; the Nevada Division ofEnvironmental Protection; and the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board.Simon, A., E. Langendoen, R. Bingner, R. Wells, A. Heins, N.Jokay, and L. Jaramillo. 2003. Lake Tahoe Basin Framework Implementation Study: Sediment Loadings and Channel Erosion. U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, National Sedimentation Laboratory. Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.Taylor, K. 2002 (March). Investigation of Near Shore Turbidity at Lake Tahoe. Prepared for Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board and Nevada Division of State Lands.Taylor, K., R. Susfalk, M. Shanafield, and G. Schladow. 2004. Near-Shore Clarity at Lake Tahoe: Status andCauses of Reduction. Prepared for Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board, Nevada Division ofState Lands,Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, and Desert Research Institute. December 2003.Tetra Tech. 2007 (February). Watershed Hydrologic Modeling and Sediment and Nutrient Loading Estimation for the Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load. Revised. Prepared for Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board Project Template Page 25 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM and University of California, Davis.Winter, S. M. 2003. Sediment Retention on a Deltaic Floodplain in Response to Climate and Land-Use Changes. Master's thesis in hydrologic sciences, University of California, Davis. Davis, CA. Stubblefield,A. P., M. I. Escobar, and E.W. Larsen. 2006. Retention of Suspended Sediment and Phosphorus on a Freshwater Delta, South Lake Tahoe, California.Wetlands Ecology and Management 14(4):287-302. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. In natural alluvial stream systems,the form and how much research has been conducted)of capacity of the active channel are generally the proposed project in 300 words or less. developed such that high frequency flows are contained within the banks. Less frequent, larger flows result in overtopping of the banks and inundation of portions or all of the floodplain. Normal overbanking is considered to occur when the channel overtops during the 2-year recurrence streamflow event.A naturally or normally functioning stream would be expected to typically overbank, on average, approximately during one event over a period of several days to a couple of weeks, every couple of years.The relatively large channel capacity of the majority of the Upper Truckee River within the study area severely limits the opportunity for flows to reach or overtop the banks during the typical snowmelt season.Therefore, streamflow(and the sediments and nutrients conveyed by the flow) is rarely able to spread out on the floodplain.To illustrate the reduction in overbanking, 35 years of recorded streamflow data were statistically analyzed and indicate that channel reaches with a capacity of 1,000 cfs would only overtop an average of just 3 -5 days yearly, and reaches with a capacity of 2,000 cfs would not overtop.The enlarged river channel reduces the potential for sediment deposition on the floodplain and, therefore, results in increased transport of fine sediment through the study area and to the lake. In spatial terms,the lengths of existing Upper Truckee River streambank in the study area that would be overtopped during a 2-year streamflow event Project Template Page 26 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM (760 cfs), for median and low lake levels, are estimated to be 2,129 feet and 1,520 feet, respectively.This indicates that less than 10 percent of the channel length within the study area would support normal overbanking processes. d. Does the project implement green technology F%-O Yes F No F N/A (e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques,etc.) 1.If so please describe Restoration of natural filtering processes is considered as a green technology as it results in sustainable long-term benefits with little required maintenance. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water F Yes F No F,/ N/A Management Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? r Yes F No F,/ N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter r Yes F No F%O_ N/A requirements(CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions r Yes F No FV_ N/A above is"no", do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an F Yes F No W7 N/A AWMP (due 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an F Yes F No W7 N/A AWMP prior to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and F Yes F No FV_ N/A submitted for the subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 F Yes F No FV_ N/A year of the grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 27 of 27 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Lukins Brothers Water Company, Inc. Name of Primary Contact Jennifer Lukins Name of Secondary Contact -- Mailing Address 2031 West Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail jennifer@lukinswater.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-541-2606 Other Cooperating -- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Meter Conversion Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description On October 11, 2009,the California State Assembly passed Assembly (Briefly describe the project, in Bill (AB) 975, which among other things, requires all water companies 300 words or less) with 500 service connections or more to convert to water meters by year 2025. The California Public Utilities Commission modified its code Section 781 to reflect this law. Of Lukins 962 current customers, only 62 have meters. Lukins meter conversion program is to install new water meters at 900 service locations. Lukins Water is a privately owned water utility.This disqualifies Lukins from the majority of available grant funding, leaving the burden of infrastructure upgrades primarily on the ratepayers. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes,this project contributes to compliance with AB 975 which a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, requires all water companies with 500 or more connections to meter EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so customers by 2025. provide description. Political Support—List related City of South Lake Tahoe Franchise Agreement, Lahontan MOU,TRPA MOUs, agreements or TACs MOU currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description The meter conversion project is located within the water service (e.g., along the south bank of territory of Lukins Brothers Water Company Inc., in South Lake Tahoe, stream/river between river CA. Tahoe Sierra IRWM miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL 30MG water standards in accordance with the r- Yes addresses urban runoff from saved annually by attainment date, and participate in F_ N/A irrigation because the installing meters the development of future TMDLs. installation of water meters will reduce urban promotes overall water runoff. conservation. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project promotes water 30MG of water implementing measures such as r- Yes conservation and will reduce saved will reduce stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ N/A over watering,which will pollutant loads by control/restoration to meet Water reduce water runoff and reducing excess Quality Objectives (WQOs)for pollutant loads into storm watering. receiving water bodies established in drains. the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality Installation of water meters 30MG of water monitoring programs through F Yes reduces the burden of saved annually planning horizon, and coordinate F N/A demand to water aquifers, through meters annually throughout the Region. which protects water quality. improves water quality. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water Water meters allows the 30MG of water supplied by public water systems r- Yes provider to monitor water saved annually continues to meet Federal and State F N/A production and consumption, meets Federal standards. and makes detecting leaks and State much easier. Drinking water standards for supply becomes more water protected. conservation. Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r- N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet This project reduces the 30MG of water projected demands for a 20-year R- Yes demand on water supply and saved annually planning horizon. F N/A promotes water will increase conservation,which helps to ability to meet meet future demands. projected demands. WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or Installation of new water 20MG of water replace infrastructure to reliably r- Yes meters make water system savings annually supply water. F N/A operations more efficient will reduce and reliable. demand on water supply. WS3 - Implement and promote water AB975 was created to 20MG of water conservation measures and practices F Yes promote statewide water saved annually to meet state goals. F N/A conservation.The installation meets of water meters is the key conservation component in this bill. goals. GWM1 - Maintain and monitor Fv Yes Water meters promote water 20MG of water groundwater supply to assure future conservation which lessens saved annually reliability. F N/A the demand on aquifers will maintain which aids in maintaining groundwater future supply. supply for future. GWM2 - Promote groundwater The public will receive 20MG of water protection activities for high quality F- Yes notification about water saved annually groundwater, and advocate for Fv_ N/A meter installation and will maintain improvements to impacted educated how wasting water groundwater groundwater quality through public will affect their rates. The supply for future. education. public will be educated on Educating the how to make home public will aid in improvements that would achieving this save water and save them savings. money. Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM GWM3 - Manage groundwater for Water conservation manages 20MG of water multiple uses (e.g. Yes groundwater sources for saved annually municipal/industrial/agricultural F_ N/A multiple uses. Decreased helps manage supply and environmental use). residential demand will allow groundwater for for increased supply for other multiple uses. multiple uses, that would be otherwise unavailable. ER1 - Enhance and restore water Installation of water meters 20MG of water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r- Yes will promote water saved annually associated uplands to support healthy F_ N/A conservation which will allow will allow for watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife aquifers to replenish water to be and plant habitats. themselves and support available to help healthy watersheds. enhance and restore environments. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and F- N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Pi Yes Water Conservation will -- caused by existing and new reduce outdoor watering development. F_ N/A which will minimize ecosystem impacts caused by new and existing developments. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F_ Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future r N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the lJ Yes Region for information exchange. F,'_ N/A Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to encourage stewardship by the public. r N/A IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water meters and -- water quality,water supply, Yes conservation contribute to groundwater recharge,flood F N/A maintaining an adequate management) in local and regional supply of aquifers. planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, Water meters allow for -- release and exchange activities in r Yes montioring water order to improve coordination with F N/A consumption which will aid in regional planning. montioring water storage and usage. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F- N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F N/A South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. R- N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F- N/A Water meters promote conservation climate change3. which aids in reduction of usage during drought times. Also the reduction of outdoor water reduces water run off and erosion. Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F- N/A Water conservation leads to less emissions (e.g.green technology). water production and distribution. Water production and distribution is one of the highest energy users in the country. Saving the energy for distribution will contribute to greenhouse gas reduction. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency Ro- Yes F- No Water meters promote the use of water efficiency. Urban Water Use Efficiency r- Yes r No Water meters promote the use of water efficiency. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F Yes r No -- System Reoperation r" Yes F No -- Water Transfers F Yes 7 No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes F- No -- Desalination r Yes No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes R- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F- Yes Ro- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Ro- Yes F- No -- Distribution Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes r No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes r No Water meters reduce over watering. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes R7 No -- Urban Runoff Management Yes 7 No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes F No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes F No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes F No -- Forest Management r Yes No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F No -- Recharge Areas Protection r- Yes W No -- Water-dependent Recreation I— Yes W No -- Watershed Management Yes r No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes r No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 2770000 $$- 0 2770000 OR F- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $20,000 0 2790000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? .. Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 923334 184,000(20 year Water Meter Conversion replacement) Phase 1 Phase 2 923333 184,000(20 year Water Meter Conversion replacement) Phase 2 Phase 3 923333 184,000(20 year Water Meter Conversion replacement) Phase 3 Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be provided will be financed for the 25-year planning by Lukins Water Company general operation and period for project implementation (not grant maintenance budget. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Contractor pricing planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes P1- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Installation of water meters is required by law. If the project is not funded. (300 words or less) Lukins does not receive grant funding,the cost of water meters will become the burden of the rate payer. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes -- -- -- Evaluation No r N/A b. Final Design Fv Yes -- -- -- F_ F No F N/A c. Environmental r Yes -- -- -- Documentation r r No (CEQA/NEPA) C N/A d. Permitting Yes -- -- -- 7 f No N/A e. Construction Yes -- -- -- Contracting r (" No N/A f. Construction IJ Yes As soon as funding is -- 12/1/2018 Implementation r No available, contractor is ready to begin installing F N/A meters. Current meter installation occurs as needed. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed AB975 project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted)of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. I Yes I No R N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F' Yes F' No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F_ Yes F_ No W N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F' Yes F' No W N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", r Yes F' No F' N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:Grant funding will gain compliance with water meter laws. f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F' Yes F_ No N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F_ Yes F_ No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F_ No N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F_ Yes F_ No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Lukins Brothers Water Company, Inc. Name of Primary Contact Jennifer Lukins Name of Secondary Contact -- Mailing Address 2031 West Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail jennifer@lukinswater.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-541-2606 Other Cooperating -- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Waterline Replacement Project 2a Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Phase 1 of Lukins 11 Phase Waterline Replacement Project will be (Briefly describe the project, in completed in summer 2014. Phase 2a is design engineering and 300 words or less) installation of 5,521 feet of 12" water main, 915 feet of 6" waterlines, and 14 fire hydrants. Replacing existing 2" and 4" waterlines. Lukins Water is a privately owned water utility.This disqualifies Lukins from approximately 90% of available grant funding, leaving the burden of infrastructure upgrades primarily on the ratepayers. Any grant funds will relieve the burden from ratepayers. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to This project contributes to an 11 Phase System Replacement Project. a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related City of South Lake Tahoe Franchise Agreement, Lahontan MOU,TRPA MOUs, agreements or TACs MOU currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description Phase 2 is located primarily along James Ave. commerical area in (e.g., along the south bank of South Lake Tahoe, CA. stream/river between river miles or miles from Tahoe Sierra IRWM Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL New waterlines will reduce Estimated 20%of standards in accordance with the r- Yes the number of water leaks in Lukins overall attainment date, and participate in F_ N/A the system which will reduce water produced is the development of future TMDLs. TMDL loads. lost to leaking waterlines (approx. 30 leaks per year). Replacing waterlines will reduce TMDL from wasted water. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Failing waterlines causes Estimated 20%of implementing measures such as F Yes water leaks which increase Lukins overall stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ N/A pollutant loads. The water produced is control/restoration to meet Water installation of new waterlines lost to leaking Quality Objectives (WQOs)for will reduce pollutant loads by waterlines receiving water bodies established in drastically reducing the (approx. 30 leaks the Basin Plan within the planning number of water leaks. per year). horizon. Replacing waterlines will reduce pollutant loads into storm drains. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water New waterlines will replace Estimated 20%of supplied by public water systems r- Yes old failing infrastructure Lukins overall continues to meet Federal and State F_ N/A which will ensure that water produced is standards. drinking water provided will lost to leaking continue to meet Federal and waterlines State standards. (approx 30 leaks per year). Replacing waterlines will bring Lukins to compliance with Federal and State standards WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering F- N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F- N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet This project is part of a 20 Estimated 20%of projected demands for a 20-year R_ Yes year waterline replacement Lukins overall planning horizon. F_ N/A project to address projected water produced is demands for a 20-year lost to leaking horizon. waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year).This project contributes to our 20 year project. WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or Phase 2a replaces Estimated 20%of replace infrastructure to reliably r- Yes infrastructure to increase Lukins overall supply water. r N/A reliably of water supply and water produced is increase fire protection. lost to leaking waterlines (approx 30 leaks Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) per year), and will replace old infrastructure. WS3 - Implement and promote water New waterlines reduce water Estimated 20%of conservation measures and practices r- Yes leaks and will help conserve Lukins overall to meet state goals. F- N/A water. Customers in this water produced is project area will receive lost to leaking meters that will promote waterlines conservation practices. (approx 30 leaks per year). GWM1 - Maintain and monitor Yes New waterlines reduce water Estimated 20%of groundwater supply to assure future leaks which means less water Lukins overall reliability. F- N/A is wasted, and will preserve water produced is groundwater supply. lost to leaking waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year). Replacing water lines will conserve groundwater for future. GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for improvements to impacted r N/A groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for New larger waterlines will Estimated 20%of multiple uses (e.g. Fv- Yes allow for adequate flow for Lukins overall municipal/industrial/agricultural F- N/A multiple uses, which is water produced is supply and environmental use). currently unavailable. lost to leaking waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year). Replacing waterlines with ensure that Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) reliable water is available to multiple uses. ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy Fi N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and Fv_ N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. r N/A ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. Fv_ N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional When waterline projects are Estimated 20%of water-related planning activities F Yes completed, local interested Lukins overall within the planning horizon as F N/A agencies are updated as to water produced is supported by current and future what has been completed lost to leaking watershed science. and how we can offer waterlines support in the future. (approx 30 leaks per year). IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Local agencies participated in Estimated 20%of multiple jurisdictions within the R_ Yes the initial design of this major Lukins overall Region for information exchange. F N/A project. water produced is lost to leaking waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year). Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes F N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge,flood management) in local and regional N/A planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F- N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F N/A South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. Fv- N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of W N/A -- climate change3. Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F- N/A A reduction in wasted water from emissions (e.g.green technology). leaks will reduce the demand for energy from pumps, which leads to the reduction of greenhouse gases. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Increased fire protection by not already mentioned elsewhere. approximately 20% in Lukins Water System. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency I- Yes No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes r No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local r Yes F- No New larger waterlines will increase flow to commercial area. System Reoperation r Yes No -- Water Transfers r Yes No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F Yes No -- Desalination F- Yes No -- Precipitation Enhancement I- Yes No -- Recycled Municipal Water I- Yes No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F' Yes No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Fv- Yes F' No New waterlines will improve water Distribution distribution system. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F No Fewer water leaks will result in more water in the aquifer. Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes Po No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes f No New waterlines will reduce water leaks and running water that causes pollution. Water meters will reduce excess watering. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F_ No -- Urban Runoff Management F Yes F_ No New waterlines drastically reduce water leaks which reduced urban run off. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes r7, No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F No -- Forest Management r Yes P_ No -- Land Use Planning and Management F Yes F No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F No -- Water-dependent Recreation r' Yes F No -- Watershed Management r Yes Fv No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes F No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1450000 $$100,000 0 1550000 OR F- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $190,000 0 1690000 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F Yes Fv- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 150000 0 Engineering, Design, and Permitting of Phase 2a Phase 2 700000 95000 1/2 of construction of Phase 2a Phase 3 700000 95000 1/2 of construction of Phase 2a Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Remaining funding $100,000 cost from Phase 1 Waterline Project d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance will be funded through will be financed for the 25-year planning Lukins general fund operation and maintenance period for project implementation (not grant account. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Engineer and Contractor Estimate planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Ratepayers will have to pay the cost of Phase 2a if the project is not funded. (300 words or less) I a grant cannot be secured. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes -- -- -- Evaluation No r N/A b. Final Design Yes Project is ready to enter 6/1/2014 9/1/2014 F No into final engineering and design phase. r N/A c. Environmental f Yes Can begin as soon as 9/1/2014 -- Documentation CJ �� No engineering is completed (CEQA/NEPA) C N/A d. Permitting Yes Can begin as soon as 9/1/2014 -- 7 f No engineering is completed N/A e. Construction f Yes -- 5/1/2015 -- Contracting F_ No N/A f. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Implementation r W No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Lukins Brothers Water Company project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General System Rehabilitation Design Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Report. Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted)of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. I Yes I No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F' Yes F' No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F_ Yes F_ No W N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F' Yes F' No W N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F_ Yes F' No W N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:Grant funding will gain compliance with water meter laws. f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due i Yes F_ No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F_ Yes F_ No F*I- N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F' Yes F No N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Lukins Brothers Water Company, Inc. Name of Primary Contact Jennifer Lukins Name of Secondary Contact -- Mailing Address 2031 West Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail jennifer@lukinswater.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-541-2606 Other Cooperating --- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Waterline Replacement Project 7a Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Phase 1 of Lukins 11 Phase Waterline Replacement Project will be (Briefly describe the project, in completed in summer 2014. Phase 7a includes design and 300 words or less) engineering and construction of 5746 feet of 8" waterline. This project is in the surrounding vicinity of Phase 1, and will replace a large portion of failing infrastructure. This area has the highest recorded number of leaks in our water system. Lukins Water is a privately owned water utility.This disqualifies Lukins from approximately 90% of available grant funding, leaving the burden of infrastructure upgrades primarily on the ratepayers. Any grant funds will relieve the burden from ratepayers. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to This project contributes to an 11 Phase System Replacement Project. a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related City of South Lake Tahoe Franchise Agreement, Lahontan MOU,TRPA MOUs, agreements or TACs MOU currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description Phase 7a is located along Tahoe Island Drive and Tahoe Vista Drive in (e.g., along the south bank of South Lake Tahoe, CA. stream/river between river Tahoe Sierra IRWM miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL New waterlines will reduce Estimated 20%of standards in accordance with the r- Yes the number of water leaks in Lukins overall attainment date, and participate in F_ N/A the system which will reduce water produced is the development of future TMDLs. TMDL loads. lost to leaking waterlines (approx. 30 leaks per year). Replacing waterlines will reduce TMDL from wasted water. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Failing waterlines causes Estimated 20%of implementing measures such as r Yes water leaks which increase Lukins overall stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ N/A pollutant loads. The water produced is control/restoration to meet Water installation of new waterlines lost to leaking Quality Objectives (WQOs)for will reduce pollutant loads by waterlines receiving water bodies established in drastically reducing the (approx 30 leaks the Basin Plan within the planning number of water leaks. per year). horizon. Replacing waterlines will reduce pollutant loads into storm drains. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water New waterlines will replace Estimated 20%of supplied by public water systems r Yes old failing infrastructure Lukins overall continues to meet Federal and State F_ N/A which will ensure that water produced is standards. drinking water provided will lost to leaking continue to meet Federal and waterlines State standards. (approx 30 leaks per year). Replacing waterlines will bring Lukins to compliance with Federal and State standards WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering F- N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F- N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet This project is part of a 20 Estimated 20%of projected demands for a 20-year F Yes year waterline replacement Lukins overall planning horizon. F_ N/A project to address projected water produced is demands for a 20-year lost to leaking horizon. waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year).This project contributes to our 20 year project. Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or Phase 7a replaces Estimated 20%of replace infrastructure to reliably r- Yes infrastructure that increases Lukins overall supply water. F N/A reliably of water supply and water produced is increase fire protection. lost to leaking waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year), and will replace old infrastructure WS3 - Implement and promote water New waterlines reduce water Estimated 20%of conservation measures and practices r- Yes leaks and will help conserve Lukins overall to meet state goals. F N/A water. Customers in this water produced is project area will receive lost to leaking meters that will promote waterlines conservation practices. (approx 30 leaks per year). GWM1 - Maintain and monitor Yes New waterlines reduce water Estimated 20%of groundwater supply to assure future leaks which means less water Lukins overall reliability. F N/A is wasted, and will preserve water produced is groundwater supply. lost to leaking waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year). Replacing water lines will conserve groundwater for future. GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM GWM3 - Manage groundwater for New larger waterlines will Estimated 20%of multiple uses (e.g. R- Yes allow for adequate flow for Lukins overall municipal/industrial/agricultural F_ N/A multiple uses, which is water produced is supply and environmental use). currently unavailable. lost to leaking waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year). Replacing waterlines with ensure that reliable water is available to multiple uses. ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and Fv_ N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. r N/A ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. F-7 N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional When waterline projects are Estimated 20%of water-related planning activities r Yes completed, local interested Lukins overall within the planning horizon as F N/A agencies are updated as to water produced is supported by current and future what has been completed lost to leaking watershed science. and how we can offer waterlines support in the future. (approx 30 leaks per year). Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Local agencies participated in Estimated 20%of multiple jurisdictions within the R- Yes the initial design of this major Lukins overall Region for information exchange. F- N/A project. water produced is lost to leaking waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year). IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to Fi N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge,flood management) in local and regional r N/A planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with F- N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community Fv- N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F- N/A South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. F- N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F- N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A A reduction in wasted water from emissions (e.g.green technology). leaks will reduce the demand for energy from pumps, which leads to the reduction of greenhouse gases. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r-- N/A Increased fire protection and not already mentioned elsewhere. reliability in Lukins Water System. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes F- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes F- No New larger waterlines will increase flow to commercial area. System Reoperation F- Yes F No -- Water Transfers F- Yes No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F Yes i� No -- Desalination r Yes F No -- Precipitation Enhancement r' Yes r No -- Recycled Municipal Water r• Yes R— No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes 7 No -- Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F_ No New waterlines will improve water Distribution distribution system. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation P- Yes F_ No Fewer water leaks will result in more water in the aquifer. Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes W No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes r No New waterlines will reduce water leaks and running water that causes pollution. Water meters will reduce excess watering. Salt and Salinity Management r- Yes Fv- No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes F_ No Installation of new waterlines will reduce water leaks and reduce runoff into storm drains. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes Fv- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and [- Yes F No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes Fv- No -- Forest Management r Yes F No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes Fv- No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F7, No -- Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes W No -- Watershed Management F_ Yes F No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes F No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 700000 $$- 0 700000 OR F, DAC 2. Annual Operations and $7,000 0 707000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? .. Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 50000 No O&M Cost Design, Engineering and Permit Costs Phase 2 650000 650000 Phase 7a waterline replacement.Tahoe Vista/Tahoe Island Drive Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance will be funded through will be financed for the 25-year planning Lukins general fund operation and maintenance period for project implementation (not grant account. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Engineer and Contractor Estimate planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes v No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Ratepayers will have to pay the cost of Phase 7a if the project is not funded. (300 words or less) a grant cannot be secured. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes -- -- -- Evaluation No r N/A b. Final Design Yes Project is ready to enter 6/1/2014 9/1/2014 F No into final engineering and design phase. r N/A c. Environmental f Yes Can begin as soon as 9/1/2014 -- Documentation CJ �� No engineering is completed (CEQA/NEPA) C N/A d. Permitting r Yes Can begin as soon as 9/1/2014 -- r No engineering is completed N/A e. Construction f Yes -- 5/1/2015 -- Contracting F_ No N/A f. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Implementation r W No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Lukins Brothers Water Company project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General System Rehabilitation Design Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Report. Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted)of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. I Yes I No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F' Yes F' No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F_ Yes F_ No W N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F' Yes F' No W N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F_ Yes F' No W N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:Grant funding will gain compliance with water meter laws. f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F' Yes F_ No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F_ Yes F_ No Fv N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F_ Yes F_ No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Alpine County Name of Primary Contact Sarah Green Name of Secondary Contact Brian Peters Mailing Address 50 Diamond Valley Road, Markleeville, CA 96120 E-mail sgreen@alpinecountyca.gov Phone (###)###-#### 530-694-2327 Other Cooperating Alpine Watershed Group, Markleeville Public Utility District Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Markleeville Creek Floodplain Restoration Project Project Category R Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The project will 1) restore the natural stream channel and floodplain (Briefly describe the project, in to improve geomorphic function and reconnect the stream to its 300 words or less) historic floodplain, and 2) relocate and replace aging sewer infrastructure in the floodplain to reduce the threat of water quality impairments from flooding and sewer leaks, and 3) provide public access and recreations features including walking trails and interpretive signage. Total number of projects 1 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes- It's in phase 3 of 3. It is also a restoration priority of Carson River a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan (2007) and Carson River EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so Watershed Floodplain Management Plan (2008). It also achieves the provide description. Markleeville's PUD's sewer facility safety assessment and remediation plans Political Support—List related MOU with Alpine Watershed Group and Markleeville Public Utility MOUs, agreements or TACs District; MOU with US Forest and Bureau of Land Management currently in place. Regarding land transfer and restoration; Technical Advisory Committee involved in design review and project planning Project Location: Latitude: 38.69486 Longitude: -119.77797 Project Location Description Along the northest bank of Markleeville Creek,just downstream (east) (e.g., along the south bank of of Highway 89 bridge Tahoe Sierra IRWM stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Project will reduce the treat -- implementing measures such as r Yes of water quality impairments stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A from flooding and sewer control/restoration to meet Water leaks; project will install Quality Objectives (WQOs)for stormwater treatment receiving water bodies established in system for Highway 89 the Basin Plan within the planning runoff; restored floodplain horizon. will spread and slow water flows effectively reducing erosion and allow trapping of sediments/nutrients during overbank events WQ3 - Implement water quality -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Project site lacks stream 1 acre of wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes bank, riparian and upland floodplain to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A vegetation due to past reconstructed processes. development and alteration; and riparian Restored floodplain will vegetation reestablish natural water restored filtering processes, provide ecological benefits of overbanking and establish biogeochemical cycling WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or Project will replace aging 700 linear feet of replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes sewer infrastructure, new sewer line collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A eliminate all manholes in the through the wastewater. floodplain and reduce the floodplain; 4 new threat of water quality manholes located impairments from flooding outside the and sewer leaks floodplain WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. Fv' N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. Fv N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Fv N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Project will enhance 400 linear feet of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes degraded streams to support streambank associated uplands to support healthy r N/A healthy native fish stabilized; 1 acre watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife population; reestablishing of floodplain and plant habitats. riparian environment will restored provide important wildlife habitat and travel corridors; project will recover lost habitat due to site development ER2 - Develop and implement Project involves site 5 acres programs to prevent the spread of r Yes monitoring and stewardship monitored for existing invasive species and r N/A to prevent any future weed-free status colonization of potential future infestation invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes Sewer system improvements 700 linear feet of caused by existing and new will reduce potential for new sewer line development. F N/A leaks; phase 1 of the project through the involved relocating the USFS floodplain; 4 new facility and removing existing manholes located structures from the site; outside the phase 3 will remove floodplain; 250 floodwall which channelizes linear feet of stream and increases water floodwall velocity and bank erosion; removed; 2 acres project will revegetate of land erodible soils revegetated IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Project applies proven 2007 Markleeville water-related planning activities r Yes stream and floodplain Creek Restoration within the planning horizon as r N/A restoration practices; Design Report supported by current and future Technical Advisory and 2013 Design watershed science. Committee guiding all Plan provide aspects of project design and scientific basis implementation IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Collaboration is an integral 8 natural multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes part of the project given the resource agencies Region for information exchange. r N/A multi components of the and community project—stream restoration, groups sewer, and public represented on recreation/education; the Technical Technical Advisory Advisory Committee provides diverse Committee professional input; public outreach efforts offer valuable community representation Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and Public education component 10 watershed awareness of watershed functions, r Yes of project will engage stewards protection and restoration needs to r N/A community and visitors in monitoring site; encourage stewardship by the public. learning about watershed 30 volunteers resources and hands-on assisting with activities to assist with maintenance; restoration and natural increased natural resource protection; resource volunteers will also be awareness of 100 involved in long-term project community stewardship through annual members and restoration projects and visitor ongoing site monitoring IWM4- Promote activities that Existing flood wall has 250 linear feet of reduce flood risk. F Yes exacerbated flooding floodwall Fv N/A condition at the site and removed; 1 acre accelerated bank failure of floodplain downstream; reconstructed reconstructed floodplain will permit for overbanking and alleviate current flood hazards; project will reduce risk of sewer system inundation due to flooding and reduce risk of sewer pipe failure; reduce flood risk IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Restored floodplain will allow 1 acre of water quality,water supply, r Yes stream corridor to floodplain groundwater recharge,flood F N/A accommodate variable flood reconstructed management) in local and regional flows;floodplain will offer and riparian planning efforts and support efforts some water storage and vegetation to continue improving the science. attenuate stream flow; restored improved stream bank and riparian area vegetation will provide a carbon bank Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Project is being planned in partnership considerations. with Washoe Tribe; representative from Washoe Environmental Protection Department serves on Technical Advisory Committee; working to integrate native American historical and cultural interpretive signs b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Project will help mitigate potential climate change3. long-term impacts of climate change as described in IWM5 e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes Fv- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency I— Yes Fv- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r" Yes F%-o No -- System Reoperation r Yes F%-O No -- Water Transfers r- Yes F%-o No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater Yes Iv- No -- Desalination Yes rv- No -- Precipitation Enhancement r" Yes F%-o No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes F%-O No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes F%-O No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes F%-O No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation Yes rv- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r" Yes F%-o No -- Pollution Prevention Yes 1— No Reduced erosion due to stream channelization and decaying floodwall; reduce potential for sewage leaks/spills Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F%-O No -- Urban Runoff Management Fv- Yes F- No Storm water treatment system for highway runoff will be installed Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F- Yes Fv- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes F%-o No -- Water Pricing) Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Ecosystem Restoration Fv Yes F_ No Provides multiple environmental benefits (chemical, biological, geomorphic and hydrologic) Forest Management Yes F%-o No -- Land Use Planning and Management W Yes r- No Project has been integrated into downtown Markleeville pedestrian plans; helps meet ordinances of the County Code; meets long-standing commitment with U.S. Forest Service to reclaim and remediate property Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F%-o No -- Water-dependent Recreation F%-o Yes r- No Will offer stream access, riparian walking trails and natural resource interpretive signage Watershed Management F%-o Yes F_ No High priority restoration project; addressed in multiple watershed Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F%-o Yes F_ No Alleviates and mitigates flood impacts Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1550000 $$- 0 1600000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $5,000-$10,000 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F,/ Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 700000 0 Sewer System Modifications Phase 2 800000 0 Site Restoration and sewer activation Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project District Attorney $27,000 cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Alpine Watershed $23,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Group and County Staff Time e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Covered by additional grant funding and partner will be financed for the 25-year planning match period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Technical Restoration Design Plans planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? rv- Yes F- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if the project is not funded. (300 words or less) 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Vo Yes Preliminary Planning, -- 12/1/2013 Evaluation r r No community outreach, and project assessment r N/A b. Final Design r Yes -- -- -- Iv— No N/A c. Environmental r Yes Initial Study and -- 12/1/2014 Documentation r No Mitigated Negative (CEQA/NEPA) Declaration Complete r N/A d. Permitting r Yes Necessary permitting -- 12/1/2015 r r No packages being developed r N/A e. Construction r Yes -- -- 6/1/2016 Contracting r PO No r N/A f. Construction r Yes -- -- 12/1/2016 Implementation r P No r N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Upper Carson River Watershed project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Stream Corridor Condition Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Assessment (2004), Carson River Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan (2007), Carson River Watershed Floodplain Management Plan (2008) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 2007 Markleeville Creek Restoration feasibility of this project Design Report and 2013 Design Plan provide hydro-geomorphic analysis and modeling c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Since 2007, environmental research has been conducted) of the proposed project in consultants have conducted 300 words or less. hydraulic and geomorphic assessment, collected supplemental observations of site geomorphology, hydraulics and vegetation,validated flood model for existing conditions and done engineering review of sewer system modifications d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? I— Yes r No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes No N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No N/A 12/31/12)? Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior r Yes r No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the i- Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the Yes r No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Kim Garon Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating -- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Mountain View Well Ground Water Protections Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description STPUD performed a conditions assessment in 2012 of all water (Briefly describe the project, in infrastructure. The Mountain View Well was identified in this 300 words or less) assessment as needing extensive wellhead protection and rehabilitation. The well structures and appurtenances have exceeded AWU Useful Life and will need to updated.The updates would include replacement piping, casing, screens, etc. In addition,the wellhead protection necessary at this well will also protect the groundwater resources. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 5 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related -- MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 38.87680 Longitude: -120.03180 Project Location Description 1329 Mountain Meadow Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA (e.g., along the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Tahoe Sierra IRWM Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- standards in accordance with the F_ Yes attainment date, and participate in F- N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as F_ Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate R_ N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water The goal of this project is to -- supplied by public water systems R_ Yes ensure that drinking water continues to meet Federal and State F N/A supply will continue to meet standards. the Federal and State standards by providing the necessary wellhead protection and upgrades on drinking water production wells. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering Fi N/A processes. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F- N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet This project will ensure the This well is projected demands for a 20-year r- Yes continued availability of currently planning horizon. F N/A water supply to meet the pumping 125 STPUD UWMP projected gallons per demands for a 20-year minute (gpm)with planning horizon. a capacity of 225 gpm.This water supply is necessary for current and projected demands. WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or This project will upgrade The Mountain replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes existing water supply View Well is well supply water. F N/A infrastructure to continue a is currently reliable water supply. pumping 125 gallons per minute (gpm)with a capacity of 225 gpm.The well supplies 32.8 Million Gallons annually to STPUD water customers. WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. Fv N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor Ri Yes The Mountain View Well -- groundwater supply to assure future needs upgrades to ensure reliability. F N/A protection of the groundwater from which it pumps. Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for fv— N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Fi N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and fv N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and F- N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. R_ N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional This project,the Mountain -- water-related planning activities F Yes View Wellhead and within the planning horizon as F N/A Groundwater Protection supported by current and future project is part of a larger watershed science. Water Optimization Plan that the STPUD continues to update consistently to provide water related planning activities. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to F- N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes F N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge,flood management) in local and regional N/A planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with regional planning. r N/A If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F— N/A Yes, South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community and the project Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. F- N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency P� Yes F No The project would enhance current wellhead capacity and ensure the best use of the water supply. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local r Yes F No The Mountain View Well is part of the conveyance infrastructure of STPUD and needs upgrades to continue to operate and protect the wellhead and the groundwater supply. System Reoperation I Yes No -- Water Transfers r Yes F No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes F No -- Desalination r Yes F No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes No -- Recycled Municipal Water I- Yes No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes R- No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F_ No The project is the protection of Distribution drinking water treatment and distribution at an operating water supply well Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes Fv- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r' Yes F No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes P_ No -- Salt and Salinity Management r Yes 7, No -- Urban Runoff Management r' Yes F No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes F No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F No -- Forest Management F Yes F No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes No -- Watershed Management r Yes F No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes Fv No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 238000 $$59,500 0 297500 OR F- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $19,040 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? .. Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 297500 19040 Installation of the necessary wellhead protection upgrades Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project STPUD Capitol $59,500 cost Improvement Funding d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs STPUD General Funds will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Project has gone through an identification and planning, bid, etc.) assessment process for the upgrades necessary for wellhead and groundwater protection. Prices were estimated by the engineering department. Bids have not been advertised. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The Mountain View Well supplies 32 Million the project is not funded. (300 words or less) Gallons annually for distribution to the 18,000 water customers of STPUD. This is a significant water supply source and without the upgrades,this supply could become contaminated and lost to the system. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F_ No F Yes -- -- -- Evaluation f No (� N/A b. Final Design W Yes -- -- -- r No N/A c. Environmental Fv Yes -- -- -- Documentation �- (CEQA/NEPA) No N/A d. Permitting f Yes Permitting would be 5/1/2015 11/1/2015 No completed during the bidding and contracting f N/A phase. e. Construction f Yes Full design would need to 5/1/2015 11/1/2015 Contracting No go out for formal bid process and award. (� N/A f. Construction Yes Implementation of the 5/1/2015 11/1/2015 Implementation r No wellhead and groundwater protection IJ N/A items identified in the assessment and design process. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is Permitting, bid and award and construction implementation will all checked as current status need to be completed within one project timeframe. Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed California Waterworks Standards project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General (Calif. DWR Bulletin 74-81 and Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat AWWA Standards A100-06 wells) Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the STPUD Conditions Assessment feasibility of this project Report, 2013 c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much This is maintenance and upgrade on research has been conducted) of the proposed project in a water supply operating well and 300 words or less. although there is no scientific basis for this project,there are water supply standards as listed above. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. i Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F*I- Yes F- No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes F- No F- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes No N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", I Yes No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F- Yes F- No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F- Yes F- No F- N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the Yes No N/A grant submittal date? Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Jessica Thompson Name of Secondary Contact Dan Wilkins Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee, CA 96161 E-mail jhompson@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2938 Other Cooperating Truckee River Watershed Council, Placer County, Lahontan Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Regional Water Quality Control Board Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Town of Truckee Stormwater Management and Retrofits Project Category r Restoration V Storm Water/Flood Control 7 Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The goal of the project is improve stormwater quality and the water (Briefly describe the project, quality of our rivers, streams, and lakes through installation of drainage in 300 words or less) treatment on roadway and pedestrian improvement projects along existing legacy sites along the Truckee River Corridor. The project will also incorporate public education and outreach on stormwater pollution and ways to prevent pollution. Areas located within the Truckee River Corridor watershed including the Downtown/Brickelltown area, neighborhoods and roadways that border the Truckee River were constructed prior to current stormwater drainage standards. Implementation of the Truckee River Water Quality Monitoring Plan has helped identify high priority areas and subwatersheds. Additional post project monitoring will be included in the projects to help guide and refine future project BMP and LID standards in the area. As of 2013, the Town has 11 retrofit projects within the Truckee River Corridor that will install various stormwater improvements as part of a larger project. All of these projects can be done separately and the order of implementation does not matter. The stormwater improvements will only be done as part of the larger project as the stormwater improvements depend on other factors such as existing drainage system tie-ins or replacement or repair, re-contouring existing drainage patterns, etc. that are not efficient to be completed without the entire project being implemented. Retrofit projects include: Glenshire Drive bike lanes and reconstruction, Mousehole, Avery Hotel, West River Street Bike Lanes and Reconstruction, Donner Pass Road Safety Improvements, Brickelltown Streetscape, Annual Paving and Drainage project, Riverview Corp Yard, Old County Corp Yard, and Donner Pass Road/Bridge Street/West River Intersection. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 7 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute Yes, Middle Truckee River TMDL implementation,Truckee's Phase 2 to a larger Project (e.g., NPDES permit,Truckee River Water Quality Monitoring Plan TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List Stormwater Citizens Advisory Committee related MOUs,agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.33742 Longitude: -120.17968 Project Location Description Implementation of BMPs and LID retrofit improvements installed in high (e.g., along the south bank of priority area throughout Town. stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Middle Truckee River Pre and post standards in accordance with the r Yes TMDL recommends reduction water quality attainment date, and participate in r NSA of sediment loads to the monitoring data. the development of future TMDLs. Truckee River. This project implements BMPs to reduce the sediment loads in high priority areas to help achieve this goal. Project Template Page 2 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The project will install BMPs Pre and post implementing measures such as r Yes and LID retrofits as part of water quality stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A larger projects to improve monitoring data. control/restoration to meet Water water quality and help meet Quality Objectives (WQOs)for WQOs of the Middle Truckee receiving water bodies established in River. the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality Water quality monitoring Pre and post monitoring programs through r Yes conducted as part of the water quality planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A TRWQMP prioritizes areas monitoring data. annually throughout the Region. needing improvements. Monitoring is coordinated with Placer County and Truckee River Watershed Council efforts to reduce redundancy and provide cost effective results.This provides pre water quality monitoring data. As projects are implemented, post data is collected as part of the project implementation. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Implementation of the Pre and post wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes project BMPs and LID water quality to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A improvements helps improve monitoring data. processes. the Truckee River watershed by reducing sediment loads and other pollutants related to sediment. Implementation of LID improvements restores the natural filtering processes of the watershed. Project Template Page 3 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. Project Template Page 4 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and V N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes The project would retrofit Pre and post caused by existing and new areas of existing water quality development. C-" N/A development. Results of the monitoring data. retrofit projects, based on pre and post water monitoring data can also be used to help guide future BMPs and LID improvements in new development. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The projects locations are Pre and post water-related planning activities r Yes chosen based on water water quality within the planning horizon as r N/A quality monitoring data monitoring data. supported by current and future results. Effectiveness and watershed science. success of the projects are supported by post water quality monitoring data. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The water quality monitoring Pre and post multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes data used to make decisions water quality Region for information exchange. r. N/A on the project locations is a monitoring data. collaborative effort between Placer County,Town of Truckee, and Truckee River Watershed Council. Post water quality monitoring that is implemented as part of the projects are also part of this collaborative effort. Project Template Page 5 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and All projects include public Number of awareness of watershed functions, r Yes eduction and outreach, attendees and protection and restoration needs to r N/A including hands-on projects participants at encourage stewardship by the public. that schools can help with, the functions. education and outreach for the contractor and engineering community, and publicly available data. IWM4- Promote activities that Implementation of the -- reduce flood risk. P Yes projects increases the natural r N/A function of the watershed through infiltration, thereby reducing peak flow and providing additional water storage. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water quality, groundwater Pre and post water quality,water supply, r Yes recharge, and flood water quality groundwater recharge,flood F N/A management are all monitoring data. management) in local and regional improved with the project planning efforts and support efforts implementation and to continue improving the science. improved watershed function through the use of BMPs and LID improvements. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A The Truckee River terminates in considerations. Pyramid Lake, located within the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Reservation. Reductions in sediment loads benefits this community and the fisheries they depend on including Lahontan Cutthroat Trout. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Data collected helps identify trends in climate change3. water quality due to rainfall, erosion, flooding or other events. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A BMP retrofits will include LID practices emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes Fv- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Project Template Page 7 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes F%O- No -- System Reoperation r Yes F%O- No -- Water Transfers F- Yes Fv- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater Yes F%o- No -- Desalination r Yes F%o- No -- Precipitation Enhancement F- Yes FV- No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes FV- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes F,/- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes F No Surface water sources are improved by Distribution the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r" Yes I/ No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Pollution Prevention r Yes F No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Salt and Salinity Management W Yes F No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Urban Runoff Management F%o- Yes F No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r" Yes 1- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes I, No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Forest Management F- Yes Po- No -- Project Template Page 8 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Land Use Planning and Management Fv Yes F_ No Water monitoring data helps make decisions on project improvement locations and types. Data collected from pre and post projects helps direct future improvements and improve upon standard designs. Recharge Areas Protection V Yes r No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Water-dependent Recreation FV_ Yes f— No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Watershed Management FV_ Yes f— No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_/ Yes F No BMP and LID implementation improves watershed infiltration, treatment and storage,which helps manage flood risk. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 8700000 $$30,600,000 4400000 43700000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $50,000 0 50000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P/ Yes i— No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 20700000 0 These projects are ready for construction in 2014 or 2015 and consist of Glenshire phases 2 and 3, Mousehole improvements, Brickelltown Streetscape, and the Annual Paving and Drainage improvements. All projects can be implemented separately and do not depend on each other for implementation Phase 2 9000000 0 These projects are ready for construction in 2015 or 2016 and consist of West River Street Bike Lanes/Reconstruction/Drain age Improvements, Donner Pass Road Safety Improvements, and the Annual Paving and Drainage improvements. All projects can be implemened separately and do not depend on each other for implementation Project Template Page 10 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Phase 3 9300000 0 These projects are anticipated for construction in 2016 or 2017 and include Avery Hotel, Riverview Corporation Yard, Old County Corp Yard, Donner Pass Road/Bridge Street Intersection, and Annual Paving and Drainage Improvements.All projects can be implemented separately and do not depend on each other for implementation Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Measure A, Measure $30,600,000 cost V,AB 1600, Redevelopment Bond Funds, General Fund, Grant funds, and many others d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs General Fund through on-going operations costs for will be financed for the 25-year planning Public Works personnel period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Planning Costs, 2013 Capital Improvement Project planning, bid, etc.) budget g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes v, No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Many of the improvements will not be the project is not funded. (300 words or less) incorporated without funding to improve the drainage/BMPs. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 11 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes See explanation below -- -- Evaluation r ry No r N/A b. Final Design Yes See Explanation below -- -- r1_0 1v— No N/A c. Environmental r Yes See Explanation below -- -- Documentation N No (CEQA/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting !" Yes -- -- -- No N/A e. Construction Yes -- -- -- Contracting r �` No N/A f. Construction r` Yes -- -- -- Implementation r r` No r N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is This projects consists of 11 capital improvement projects in the Truckee checked as current status Town Corridor watershed that will contain stormwater improvements as part of the larger project. All of the projects are either in the planning or design phase, although some are farther along than others. The projects included in this are projected to occur over the next 5 years. Project Template Page 12 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Middle Truckee River TMDL, NPDES project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Phase 2 General Permit,Town of Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Truckee General Plan Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Town of Truckee CIP budget FY feasibility of this project 2013/14 c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much There are 11 retrofit projects research has been conducted) of the proposed project in included in this item that will 300 words or less. construct BMP and LID improvements to better treat and retain stormwater. All of the projects have a base level of assessment and studies and are supported by water monitoring data. Projects included in 'Phase 1' are in the design phase. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. i— Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe LID and BMPs e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes No v N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements r Yes F No W N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No v N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F- Yes F- No Fy-, N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: Project Template Page 13 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No W N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r Yes F No F,/_ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 14 of 14 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Kim Garon Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating -- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Tahoe Keys Force Main Bypass Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description This project is the protection of natural resources by the relocation of (Briefly describe the project, in the current Tahoe Keys Wastewater Force Main with a bypass project 300 words or less) that will help to alleviate any sewer overflows and the resultant contamination. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 6 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to This project would contribute to both the TRPA Environmental a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Improvement Program and the Lake Tahoe TMDL by reducing and/or EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so eliminating wastewater spills in the delicate Tahoe Keys provide description. environmental zone. Political Support—List related -- MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Longitude: Project Location Description -- (e.g., along the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Tahoe Sierra IRWM Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- -- standards in accordance with the F Yes attainment date, and participate in F- N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project would protect 350 linear feet of implementing measures such as F Yes Lake Tahoe by eliminating wastewater force stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ N/A wastewater overflows/spills main would be control/restoration to meet Water in the Tahoe Keys area relocated to a Quality Objectives (WQOs)for adjacent to Lake Tahoe. more secure area receiving water bodies established in to keep the the Basin Plan within the planning potential for horizon. overflow at a minimum WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate Fi N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State F- N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering N/A processes. Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or This project is the replace infrastructure for reliable r- Yes relocation/bypass of the collection,treatment and disposal of F_ N/A current Tahoe Keys wastewater. Wastewater Force Main to reduce/eliminate any wastewater overflow/spill events. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. Fi N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably F_ Yes supply water. F N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices F_ Yes to meet state goals. Fi N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F- N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for improvements to impacted N/A groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F- Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural R_ N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy R7 N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F_ Yes existing invasive species and colonization of potential future Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM invasive species. F- N/A ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F_ Yes activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. N/A ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Fv Yes When the wastewater -- caused by existing and new delivery system in the Tahoe development. F_ N/A Keys was built many decades ago, ecosystem impacts were not considered as carefully as they are currently. The placement of the Tahoe Keys Wastewater Force Main needs to be relocated for better protection of the environment. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F_ Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. Fi N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to [7 N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes Fv_ N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, F- Yes groundwater recharge,flood N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F_ Yes Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM order to improve coordination with F- N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r- N/A Yes, South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community and the project is located in this community. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. F- N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r- N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F- N/A -- emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F,1— N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes F- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F Yes r No This project is the relocation of a local wastewater conveyance to better protect the sensitive environment in which it is located. System Reoperation F Yes r No -- Water Transfers r Yes F No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes F No -- Desalination r Yes No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes F No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes F No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes F No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes P✓ No -- Pollution Prevention F Yes 7 No This project is for the protection of Lake Tahoe and to minimize the threat of any wastewater overflows/spills in the sensitive shorezone of the Tahoe Keys area. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F No -- Urban Runoff Management 7 Yes No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes r No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes F No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F No -- Forest Management r• Yes 7 No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes r No -- Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Watershed Management F_ Yes F No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes W No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 700000 $$175,000 0 875000 OR F DAC 2. Annual Operations and $56,000 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fv- Yes 1— No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 150000 There are no O&M Planning and design costs during planning and construction phases Phase 2 362500 There are no O&M Construction, relocation of costs during planning force main, phase 1 and construction phases0 Phase 3 362500 There are no O&M Construction, relocation of costs during planning force main, phase 2 and construction phases0 Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project STPUD Capitol $175,000 cost Improvement Funding d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs STPUD General Funds will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Engineering estimates planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes P No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Although the Tahoe Keys Wastewater Force Main the project is not funded. (300 words or less) is still very functional,the location allows for the possibility of sanitary sewer overflows into Lake Tahoe. With funding, STPUD could move the wastewater force main to a more reliable elevation and position, minimizing the potential for overflows/spills and the resultant polluting of Lake Tahoe. Without funding to move the wastewater force main,the potential for contamination will remain fairly high. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes -- -- -- Evaluation r- No 7 N/A b. Final Design f Yes Project design is at 70% -- -- r No r N/A c. Environmental r Yes -- 2/1/2015 4/1/2015 Documentation 7 [7 No (CEQA/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting Yes -- 2/1/2015 4/1/2015 r r No N/A Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. Construction (— Yes -- 5/1/2015 10/1/2017 Contracting r � No Cu N/A f. Construction r Yes -- 5/1/2015 10/1/2017 Implementation r [7 No (� N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Sewer systems are permitted by the project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General EPA and by the Clean Water Act and Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat California's Porter-Cologne Water Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) Quality Control Act. b. List technical reports and studies supporting the N/A feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much This project is the relocation of a research has been conducted)of the proposed project in sewer force main and is considered 300 words or less. a maintenance of existing utility infrastructure so there is no scientific basis or research on the project, however,there is much scientific data available for the contamination that results from sewer overflows/spills on natural resources d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F_ Yes F_ No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management r Yes r- No r- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes F_ No F_ N/A Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes No N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes No v N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due r Yes r- No Fv- N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior r Yes F No r N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes i No r N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r Yes r No F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Tahoe Resource Conservation District Name of Primary Contact Kim Boyd Name of Secondary Contact Kim Gorman Mailing Address 870 Emerald Bay Rd. Ste. 108, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail kboyd@tahoercd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-1501 ext. 109 Other Cooperating Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, California Department Parks Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders and Recreation, California Tahoe Conservancy,Town of Truckee, Nevada County, Sierra County, El Dorado County, Alpine County, Placer County,Truckee River Watershed Council, Private sector,Truckee Meadows Water Authority, and NV Division of Wildlife Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Regional Aquatic Invasive Species Prevention, Control and Monitoring Project Category r Restoration r- Storm Water/Flood Control r- Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) pose an ever-increasing threat to the (Briefly describe the project, in health of our Nation's and region's ecosystems, and in turn can have a 300 words or less) direct negative effect on local economies. Thousands of AIS have been dispersed or transplanted across the globe by humans. These species arrive in the ballast or on the hulls of ships,through the movement of shellfish and bait, by the opening of new channels or canals, through intentional release, and other vectors. Much of the ongoing spread of AIS to inland waters throughout North America can be attributed to the overland movement of trailered watercraft. Additionally, spread of AIS can occur by way of fishing gear such as footwear, bait and tackle equipment. Once established, they can change ecosystems, reduce native biodiversity and impact local economies. This regional project will implement 3 critical components of Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) measures. Prevention includes watercraft inspection; Control includes removal of existing AIS; and Monitoring includes status and trend detections of expanding or new infestations. All components include education and outreach. These programs and projects are implemented by a diverse partnership of entities from federal, state and local government, private citizens and business, and nonprofit organizations. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Tahoe Sierra IRWM Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 6 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes, EIP for attainment of a variety of environmental thresholds, a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, including water quality,fisheries and wildife and recreation. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related Lake Tahoe AIS Management Plan, Lake Tahoe AIS Coordination MOUs, agreements or TACs Committee Charter,TRPA Regional Plan Update;Truckee Regional AIS currently in place. Prevention Program MOU Project Location: Latitude: 38.91605 Longitude: -120.00876 Project Location Description Throughout entire Tahoe Sierra IRWM Region. (e.g., along the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Removing aquatic invasive Acres of aquatic implementing measures such as r Yes plants decreases invasive plants stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A sedimentation and removed control/restoration to meet Water associated nutrient loads. Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F_ Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water Preventing and controlling Matrix of AIS bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes AIS supports healthy prevented, #of associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds by decreasing inspections, and watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife degradation associated with acres of AIS and plant habitats. AIS infestations removed ER2 - Develop and implement Watercraft inspections and Matrix of AIS programs to prevent the spread of r Yes decontaminations directly detected and existing invasive species and r N/A prevent the spread of AIS and prevented, #of colonization of potential future continued monitoring detects inspections, and invasive species. those infestations to be acres of AIS treated and controlled removed ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Fv' Yes Controlling AIS in existing Matrix of AIS caused by existing and new marinas reduces the spread detections and development. r N/A of AIS species from those acres of AIS sources controlled IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This program is coordinated Description of multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes through the collaboration of collaborative Region for information exchange. r N/A multiple jurisdictions to actions better share resources and coordinated information, standardize among methods for prevention, jurisdicitons control and data collection. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and Project contains an Number and awareness of watershed functions, r Yes education/outreach Distribution of protection and restoration needs to r N/A component designed to outreach encourage stewardship by the public. increase public awareness of materials, #of AIS prevention, control and press releases,# monitoring of inspections IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes V N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. I% N/A -- Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A local economic benefits through not already mentioned elsewhere. protection of recreational resources 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes F%70 No -- System Reoperation r Yes F%-O No -- Water Transfers r Yes F%-O No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r" Yes F%70 No -- Desalination r- Yes r No -- Precipitation Enhancement I— Yes F%-O No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes F%-O No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r" Yes F%-O No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F%o No -- Distribution Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation Yes Fv- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use Yes F%o- No -- Pollution Prevention Yes r No Restore natural aquatic habitats through removal of AIS which can increase sedimentation and nutrient loads Salt and Salinity Management Yes F%O- No -- Urban Runoff Management Yes F%O- No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes F%O- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes FV_ No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes r No Restore natural aquatic habitats through prevention and control of AIS Forest Management r" Yes r No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes r No Implementation of AIS prevention and control efforts may influence decisions related to land use planning and management Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F%O- No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes r No Implementation of AIS prevention and control is directly related to water- dependent recreation Watershed Management W Yes r No Implementation of AIS prevention, control and monitoring contributes to watershed management efforts Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r" Yes R-0 No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 3000000 $$750,000 100000 3850000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $45,000 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P/ Yes i— No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 1200000 15000 Watercraft inspection and decontamination,AIS removal,AIS monitoring Phase 2 1325000 15000 Increase regional watercraft inspection and decontamination,AIS removal,AIS monitoring Phase 3 1325000 15000 Increase regional watercraft inspection and decontamination,AIS removal,AIS monitoring Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project User Fees $750,000 cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Lake Tahoe $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Restoration Act, SB 630,Truckee River Fund,ANS Task Force e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M costs are related to control efforts.The will be financed for the 25-year planning sustainability of control efforts may require annual period for project implementation (not grant maintenance removal efforts. These costs will be funded). contributed by the landowner/manager f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Previous implementation planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes 15,71 No Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM h.Please describe what impact there may be if Negative impacts from the establishment and the project is not funded. (300 words or less) spread of AIS would effect local economies from decreased recreational revenue,water suppliers from increased cost of delivery and purification, health and viability of native and desired fisheries, and health of watersheds on a region-wide scale. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes -- -- -- Evaluation r No N/A b. Final Design Yes -- -- -- r r No Wo N/A c. Environmental r Yes Environmental 12/1/201 6/1/2014 Documentation r No Documentation 3 (CEQA/NEPA) completed for aquatic r N/A plant control projects within the Lake Tahoe Basin d. Permitting F_ Yes Additional areas 12/1/201 6/1/2016 W W No prioritized outside the 5 Lake Tahoe Basin will F_ N/A require permitting for AIS control efforts e. Construction F_ Yes Contracting for AIS 2/1/2016 5/1/2016 Contracting P/ W No control efforts will be needed to implement F_ N/A treatment for control Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. Construction r Yes Conducting watercraft 5/1/2016 12/1/2018 Implementation F%O- W- No inspection and decontamination, F N/A implementing control efforts and monitoring Provide explanation if more than one project stage is This project contains elements of prevention, control and monitoring. checked as current status Permitting and contracting may be needed for control, while prevention and monitoring will not require these tasks. However, all three components will be implemented concurrently. Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed TRPA Regional Plan Update, Lake project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Tahoe AIS Management Plan, Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Finance Plan for Lake Tahoe AIS Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Wittmann, M. 2008. Recreational feasibility of this project Boating and the Spread of Aquatic Invasive Species in andAround Lake Tahoe, California-Nevada. Ph.D. Thesis. University of California SantaBarbara.Wittmann, M., S. Chandra,J. Reuter, and G. Schladow. 2008. Asian clam and Lake Tahoe:Preliminary Findings and Future Needs.Technical Report. University of California Davis,TERC and University of Nevada Reno, Asian clam (Corbicula fluminea) of Lake Tahoe: Preliminary scientific findings in support of a management plan: Marion Wittmann,John Reuter, Geoff Schladow, Scott Hackley, Brant Allen UC Davis - Tahoe Environmental Research Center and Sudeep Chandra,Andrea Caires University of Nevada, Reno, December 2008 Quagga Mussel Survivorability, Sudeep Chandra, U N R, 2010 c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much A significant collection of studies, research has been conducted)of the proposed project in reports and Management Plans have 300 words or less. been completed both nationally and locally on AIS introduction and establishment. An adaptive approach is maintained for this project that continually analyzes the scientific data with cost/benefits. New research feeds into on-going management decisions to best serve the protection of regional watersheds. Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F%O_ Yes F No r N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe LID techniques e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F%o N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F%o N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No F%o N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No Fv- N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No W, N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No FV_ N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No F%_O N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Tahoe Resource Conservation District Name of Primary Contact Kim Boyd Name of Secondary Contact Kim Gorman Mailing Address 870 Emerald Bay Rd. Ste. 108, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail kboyd@tahoercd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-1501 ext. 109 Other Cooperating University of California, Davis,Tahoe Environmental Research Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Center Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Small-scale Testing of Micro Stormwater Infiltration Systems Project Category F Restoration v, Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Recent analysis of LiDAR data and other remotely sensed data has (Briefly describe the project, in identified a potential to develop stormwater detention and 300 words or less) infiltration areas based on small-scale patterns of land topography. This information makes it possible to identify the volume of Micro Stormwater Infiltration Systems (MSIS) achievable by small and simple modifications to existing depressions in the landscape (LID). MSIS have the potential to infiltrate urban stormwater and reduce inputs of nutrients and sediments to Lake Tahoe, a key goal of the Lake Tahoe TMDL. This project aims to identify suitable basins in two urban communities for small-scale testing, implement LID to improve urban stormwater retention on selected basins, and evaluate their ability to retain key pollutants. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 5 of 6 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes,TMDL for Lake Tahoe urban stormwater reduction, EIP for a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, attainment of lake clarity threshold. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related TRPA Regional Plan Update, Meyers Area Plan MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.06337 Longitude: -120.12830 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description Within two urban communities on the California side of the Lake (e.g., along the south bank of Tahoe Basin (Meyers,Tahoma) stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Project aims to meet TMDL Storage capacity standards in accordance with the r Yes goals by retaining urban of MSIS,volume attainment date, and participate in r N/A stormwater runoff and thus of stormwater the development of future TMDLs. reducing input of nutrients retained and/or and fine sediment particles infiltrated to Lake Tahoe. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by MSIS are an LID method for Estimation of implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater retention and sediment stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A infiltration. Storage and captured,volume control/restoration to meet Water infiltration of stormwater will of stormwater Quality Objectives (WQOs)for reduce downstream erosion retained and/or receiving water bodies established in potential. infiltrated the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality Coordination of MSIS #of jurisdictions monitoring programs through r Yes throughout the basin if test participating,#of planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A communities are successful, conferences/ annually throughout the Region. promulgate results at basin- meetings with wide conferences, meetings. presentations of results. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State W N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year ly Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. F%' N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water Enhancement of natural #of raingardens bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes landscape depressions for constructed associated uplands to support healthy r N/A MSIS could include watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife raingardens that provide and plant habitats. small-scale habitat areas ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Fv' Yes Utilizing LID enhanced Model and/or caused by existing and new natural landscape features measure development. r N/A for stormwater retention pollutants reduces need for new, large retained using LID impact development. methods IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Implementation of small- #of small-scale water-related planning activities r Yes scale testing of LID MSIS for detention basins within the planning horizon as r N/A feasibility and effectiveness tested supported by current and future in reducing urban watershed science. stormwater runoff, nutrients and sediments. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Project will require regional #of partners,#of multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes collaboration between meetings held Region for information exchange. r N/A jurisdictions and stormwater between partners regulators for successful to share implementation. information IWM3 - Increase public education and Project contains an #of attendees at awareness of watershed functions, r Yes education/outreach HOA/community protection and restoration needs to r N/A component designed to meetings or encourage stewardship by the public. make the public aware of workshops urban landscaping and its effect on the watershed Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4- Promote activities that MSIS collectively have a large #of properties reduce flood risk. R Yes storage and infiltration with reduced F N/A capacity to reduce flood risk, flooding potential especially in areas of localized flooding. IWMS -Address climate change (e.g. With expected increase in #of basins water quality,water supply, r Yes the %of precipitation falling identified as groundwater recharge,flood r N/A as rain instead of snow due suitable for management) in local and regional to climate change, MSIS can stormwater planning efforts and support efforts improve water quality and capture,volume to continue improving the science. reduce flooding by using of stormwater natural landscape features to retained/infiltrate make the watershed more d resilient and reducing dependence on large scale stormwater retention/treatment structures. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. I, N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. IV- N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Increased stormwater storage capacity climate change3. for increased %of precipitation as rain e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A LID requires less infrastructure, thus emissions(e.g.green technology). less energy to build, use, maintain f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A Streetscaping aesthetics: less curb and not already mentioned elsewhere. gutter,fewer large concrete stormwater treatment and retention structures, more natural features 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F%O- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local r Yes W No -- System Reoperation r Yes F%O- No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers Yes FV_ No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F Yes l;_o� No -- Desalination "' Yes F%O- No -- Precipitation Enhancement !"' Yes F%o No -- Recycled Municipal Water !`"' Yes F%o- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes F%o No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F%O- No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r" Yes r No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r" Yes ry—, No -- Pollution Prevention W Yes r No Reduce runoff carrying nutrients and sediments from urban landscape Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F%O- No -- Urban Runoff Management W Yes F_ No Retain and infiltrate urban runoff on- site before it can enter Lake Tahoe Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes FV_ No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes F%o- No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration Yes ry—, No -- Forest Management r Yes r%_0 No -- Land Use Planning and Management FV_ Yes F_ No Incorporate LID into compact and sustainable development Recharge Areas Protection I— Yes FV_ No -- Water-dependent Recreation F Yes r%—o No -- Watershed Management r%_0 Yes F No MSIS to help restore more natural hydrologic conditions Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r%—o Yes F No Increase on-site stormwater storage and infiltration capacity Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 300000 $$75,000 0 375000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and 510,000 0 10000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P/ Yes i— No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 55000 0 groundtruthing UDAR data, adding urban GIS layers, selecting suitable test basins, community outreach Phase 2 230000 0 implementation of selected MSIS: permitting, construction Phase 3 15000 10000 evaluation and assessment of MSIS effectiveness Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding DWR, EPA $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs El Dorado County for two selected communities, will be financed for the 25-year planning landowners with MSIS on their properties period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, conceptual planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes V No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Increased high impact development, increased the project is not funded. (300 words or less) nutrient and sediment input to Lake Tahoe, decline in water quality, increased localized flooding risk, increased erosion 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Vo Yes SNPLMA funded LiDAR -- 11/1/2013 Evaluation r r No analysis r N/A b. Final Design r Yes Add GIS stormwater -- 1/1/2015 W 1v No infrastructure and groundwater layer to r N/A LiDAR maps, groundtruth, select suitable basins for MSIS implementation c. Environmental r Yes NOE submittals, as -- 1/1/2015 Documentation F%O r No needed (CEQA/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting r Yes Minimal permitting -- 1/1/2015 F%O- F%O- No required for small-scale LID projects, as needed r N/A e. Construction r Yes Contract for a limited -- 3/1/2015 Contracting r r No number of MSIS, 3+ in Tahoma, 3+ in Meyers r N/A f. Construction r Yes Implement MSIS in -- 5/1/2015 Implementation r Wo No Tahoma and Meyers N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed TRPA Regional Plan Update, project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Lahontan TMDL, Meyers Area Plan Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Schladow, Geoff, Quantifying the feasibility of this project Potential for a Low-Cost, Distributed Stormwater Detention System Using LIDAR and Remotely Sensed Data c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much SNPLMA funded UC Davis research research has been conducted) of the proposed project in project utilized newly acquired 300 words or less. LiDAR data and other remotely sensed data to identify and quantify thepotential to develop stormwater detention and infiltration areas based on small-scale patterns ofland topography. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe LID techniques e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No F%O_ N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? I— Yes i— No FV_ N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes F_ No Po N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes F No P/ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes F_ No FV_ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No W N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No W N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r Yes F No F,/_ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Tahoe Resource Conservation District Name of Primary Contact Kim Boyd Name of Secondary Contact Kim Gorman Mailing Address 870 Emerald Bay Rd. Ste. 108, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail kboyd@tahoercd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-1501 ext. 109 Other Cooperating UC California, California Tahoe Conservancy, Lahontan Water Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Board, US Forest Service, US Geological Society, South Tahoe PUD and the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Goundwater Monitoring to support nearshore management Project Category R Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description This study will explore relationships between the rate of groundwater (Briefly describe the project, in discharge, nutrient content, and the density of nuisance species 300 words or less) including AIS, periphyton, and algae to help inform related planning activities. This project will use natural temperature fluctuations to quantify groundwater discharge at specific locations in the near-shore zone in Lake Tahoe. Vertical arrays of temperature loggers will be installed in the upper 2 meters of sediment at 10 to 20 sites. The loggers will record the temperature at 4 depths with hourly precision. Analytical models of heat transport and fluid flow will be used to calculate groundwater discharge rates. Groundwater samples will be collected at each site and analyzed for nutrient content and estimates of nutrient influx will be modeled. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 4 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes, this project contributes to TMDL and EIP implementation.This a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, data will also support and compliment proposed near shore status EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so and trend monitoring by providing estimates of upland groundwater provide description. input to problem areas. Political Support—List related There is currently a Nearshore TAC, and an AIS Coordinating MOUs, agreements or TACs Committee. currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 38.93333 Longitude: -120.00000 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description Along the south shore of Lake Tahoe and select locations along the (e.g., along the south bank of west shore; a 10-20 sample locations would be required.Vertical stream/river between river arrays of temperature loggers will be installed within the upper 2 miles or miles from meter of sediment in 10 to 20 sites where the lake water depth is less Towns/intersection and/or than two meters meter deep. address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL A minimum of 10 standards in accordance with the r Yes acknowledges infiltration of groundwater attainment date, and participate in r N/A urban runoff and fertilizers as monitroing the development of future TMDLs. contributors of pollutants to locations along groundwater. This project approximately 25 will help identify miles of groundwater flux and its shoreline. association with nuisance species including AIS, and periphyton. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality This project will support a Collect data from monitoring programs through r Yes regional groundwater a minimum of 10 planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A monitoring program. groundwater annually throughout the Region. locations along approximately 25 miles of shoreline. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F_ Yes reliability. FV N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater This project will provide 1-3 presentations protection activities for high quality r Yes monitoring activities that to stakeholder groundwater, and advocate for r N/A help identify the role of groups in the improvements to impacted groundwater entering Lake watershed, as groundwater quality through public Tahoe. well as outreach education. a minimum of 1000 residents/visitors. Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement This project helps develop a A facebook programs to prevent the spread of r Yes monitoring program that will campain through existing invasive species and F N/A inform the role of Tahoe Keepers to colonization of potential future groundwater as related to educate the invasive species. nearshore aquatic invasive public about species. groundwater contributions to nearshore condition. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. Fv N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional This program will provide It is anticipated water-related planning activities r Yes opportunities for regional that partnerships within the planning horizon as r. N/A collaboration and planning and or MOUs supported by current and future related to groundwater with the CTC, watershed science. resources Water Board, TRPA, STPUD, USFS and the USGS would result. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This program is a regional It is anticipated multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes program and relies on that quarterly Region for information exchange. r N/A collaboration and planning information exchange among meetings would agencies involved in involve the CTC, managing groundwater Water Board, resources. TRPA, STPUD, USFS and the USGS. IWM3 - Increase public education and This program contains an An annual public awareness of watershed functions, r Yes educational/outreach newsletter and protection and restoration needs to r N/A component designed to press release encourage stewardship by the public. make the public aware of the would be role of groundwater and its distributed. impacts to Lake Tahoe. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes r N/A IWMS -Address climate change (e.g. Groundwater monitoring Annual Summary water quality,water supply, r Yes activities contribute to a of Finding Report groundwater recharge,flood r N/A greater understanding of the management) in local and regional hydrologic regime related to planning efforts and support efforts effects from climate change to continue improving the science. on water resources IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in C` Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A South Lake Tahoe is a designated as a disadvantaged community c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Water storage and availability will be climate change3. affected by climate change,this program helps to information groundwater inputs to near shore conditions, and also helps to inform knowledge of groundwater resources in a Sierran Mountain systems. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Will help inform knowledge of not already mentioned elsewhere. groundwater pollutant contributions to Lake Tahoe as required by the Lake Tahoe TMDL. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency Yes F%-O No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency Yes F%-O No -- Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes F%O_ No -- System Reoperation r Yes F%O- No -- Water Transfers F_ Yes Fv- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater Yes F%o- No -- Desalination r Yes F%o- No -- Precipitation Enhancement F_ Yes FV_ No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes FV_ No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes F,/_ No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes PO No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes P/ No -- Matching Water Quality to Use Yes FV_ No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes F%o- No -- Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F%o- No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes F_ No Quantifying discharge and monitoring for nutrients at specific sites in the near shore environment will help characterize groundwater quality. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship Yes FV_ No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes F%O- No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration Yes FV_ No -- Forest Management !"' Yes No -- Land Use Planning and Management Yes r No Having a better understanding of groundwater nutrients at specific sites along the near shore will help agencies better identify management opportunities,this project could also evaluate effectiveness of land management activities for reducing loads. Recharge Areas Protection r- Yes W No -- Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes FV_ No -- Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Watershed Management Fv Yes F_ No This project will help identify watershed characteristics that influence nutrient and groundwater flux into Lake Tahoe Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes F%_0 No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 190000 $$47,500 0 237500 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P/ Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 150000 0 5-10 monitoring stations(1- 2 watersheds) Phase 2 87500 0 5-10 more monitoring stations(2 additional watersheds) Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding SB 630-Lahontan $25,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Regional Water Board, 319 Funds are also a possibility. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs SB 630 funds could be used to continue monitoring will be financed for the 25-year planning activities at a reduced rate to continue to inform period for project implementation (not grant modeling efforts into the future. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Planning planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes V No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The proposed Nearshore monitoring effort for the project is not funded. (300 words or less) status and trends will not have supporting data regarding groundwater contributions. Management actions for for groundwater protection may then be delayed,the Lake Tahoe TMDL will also not likely be implemented as successfully without considering data from this source category. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F_ Yes Groundwater monitoring 4/1/2015 12/1/2018 Evaluation r F%O- No r- N/A b. Final Design r Yes -- -- -- r r- No tv— N/A c. Environmental r Yes Categorical Exemption 3/1/2015 4/1/2015 Documentation Wo Wo No for monitoring activities (CECI,A/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting r- Yes Lahontan Water Board 3/1/2015 4/1/2015 r FV_ No r N/A e. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Contracting r r No r N/A f. Construction r Yes Program implementation 1/1/2015 12/1/2018 Implementation P/ No including outreach, materials, and best r` N/A management practices for residents and landowners Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed California Water Plan, Lake Tahoe project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General TMDL, STPUD Groundwater Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Management Plan and the Lahontan Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Basin Plan, AIS Prevention Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Thodal 1997,Thomas et al. 2004, Lake feasibility of this project Tahoe TMDL Technical Report 2010 c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much This study will quantify groundwater research has been conducted) of the proposed project and nutrient fluxes at specific sites. in 300 words or less. Sites with AIS will be compared to nearby sites that lack AIS,thus establishing a relationship between groundwater nutrient flux and AIS if one exists. Subsurface temperature fluctuations have been used to quantify site-specific groundwater discharge and recharge in numerous studies. A review of the science and applications can be found in Anderson, 2005. Although many studies have used seasonal temperature fluctuations to estimate average yearly groundwater flux, modern equipment with high resolution (+/-0.2 degrees C) logged hourly has the potential to provide estimates of daily groundwater flux. This temporal resolution is expected to be important given the strong seasonal signal associated with the snowmelt dominated hydrologic regime in the Sierra. Nutrient analysis of groundwater will be used with the flux estimates to quantify nutrient loads entering the lake. Analytical models of subsurface temperature fluctuations have been used to quantify site- specific groundwater discharge and recharge in numerous national studies. Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No ;;_7 N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No v N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes No ry N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes F No F%, N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No V N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No i;_7 N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP F Yes F No Fv N/A prior to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for r Yes F No F N/A the subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of F Yes F No F%O N/A the grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Tahoe Resource Conservation District Name of Primary Contact Kim Boyd Name of Secondary Contact Kim Gorman Mailing Address 870 Emerald Bay Rd. Ste. 108, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail kboyd@tahoercd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-1501 ext. 109 Other Cooperating South Tahoe PUD, North Tahoe PUD,Tahoe City PUD,Truckee Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders River Watershed Council, and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Regional Landscape Conservation Measures for Lake Tahoe Project Category R Restoration s Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Regional Landscape Conservation program for the Tahoe RCD that (Briefly describe the project, in includes implementing erosion control, native and fire-wise 300 words or less) landscaping, fertilizer management, invasive weed management, and collection of water conservation measures including water harvesting technologies. Educational materials and stewardship opportunities will be used to outreach to the California side of the Lake Tahoe Basin. Additionally, this project will work cooperatively and complementary to the South Tahoe PUD's Regional Water Conservation Project and is intended in this way to increase water conservation efforts in the region. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 of 6 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes,this project contributes to the Lake Tahoe TMDL and EIP a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, implementation, it also supports AB1420 and the SBX7-7 (20 percent EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so water reduction by 2020) as mandated by the State of California. It provide description. also supports AB 32 in reducing GHG emissions. In addition, it supports South Tahoe PUD Regional Water Conservation Projects. Political Support—List related Expected completion of an Erosion Control Committee Charter prior MOUs, agreements orTACs to award for regional private property BMPs, coordination through currently in place. the Tahoe Basin Weed Coordinating Group andTahoe Basin Fertilizer Management Group, as well as the Sustainability Collaborative. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description Landscape conservation measures will be implemented throughout (e.g., along the south bank of the California side of the Lake Tahoe Basin. stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL Technical standards in accordance with the r- Yes acknowledges urban runoff assistance attainment date, and participate in F_ N/A as the largest pollutant provided for up the development of future TMDLs. contributor of fine to 400 private sediments. Urban property owners. landscaping practices such irrigation, and fertilizer use will also be addressed in this project. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project implements Up to 200 Private implementing measures such as r Yes source control of nutrients Property owners stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ N/A and sediment by capturing served with control/restoration to meet Water stormwater and snowmelt either rain barrel, Quality Objectives (WQOs)for from private property and rain garden receiving water bodies established in stores it on site for future retrofits, or the Basin Plan within the planning irrigation. It also promotes other LID horizon. native and fire-wise conservation landscaping as well as practice. irrigation and fertilizer management practices. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems F_ Yes continues to meet Federal and State F- N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet This project will assist Reach 1,200 projected demands for a 20-year r- Yes homeowners with water homeowners planning horizon. F_ N/A conservation measure and with Landscape Landscape management. conversion education materials WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. W N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water Utilizing conservation Estimated that up conservation measures and practices F Yes landscape techniques such as to 200,000 to meet state goals. F N/A water harvest technology, gallons could be and irrigation management conserved homeowners can reuse and reduce their water usage. GWM1 - Maintain and monitor F' Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Fertilizer Management in Technical protection activities for high quality F Yes near shore locations will be assistance for 100 groundwater, and advocate for F_ N/A targeted for this project. lake shore improvements to impacted Reducing fertilizer inputs to properties groundwater quality through public GW will improve drinking education. water quality and near shore Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) quality. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water This project contributes to Pollutant Load bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r- Yes the enhancement and Reduction associated uplands to support healthy F N/A restoration of Lake Tahoe Modeling for watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and its tributaries by homes receiving and plant habitats. infiltrating urban runoff and technical reducing fertilizer use. assistance ER2 - Develop and implement Invasive weed management Stewardship and programs to prevent the spread of r Yes will include education, and outreach existing invasive species and r N/A control work with community including an colonization of potential future members. annual training invasive species. and invasive weed pull ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Implementing fire-wise 150-200 fire-wise public and private landowners, P Yes landscaping is an important plants provided activities to manage forest health and r N/A component of getting private to the community wildfire risks. property owners to manage wildfire risk. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes Landscape Conservation A minimum of caused by existing and new measures will reduce erosion 100 restored development. F N/A control, water and fertilizer acres, based on use in our community. technical assistance provided above. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future r N/A watershed science. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This effort supports the Quarterly multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes information exchanged at the meeting with Region for information exchange. F N/A Water Quality BMP Private partners Parcel Group on a quarterly including TRPA, Basis. Lahontan Water Board, Local Stormwater Jurisdictions, and EPA IWM3 - Increase public education and This project will assist Reach 1,200 awareness of watershed functions, r- Yes homeowners with water homeowners protection and restoration needs to F N/A conservation measure and with Landscape encourage stewardship by the public. Landscape management. conversion education materials IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes F N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge,flood management) in local and regional N/A planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community T' N/A -- Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F_ N/A This project will serve the South Lake Tahoe and Kings Beach communities. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. F- N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F_ N/A Lanscape Conservation services help climate change3. watersheds become more resilient to climate change impacts by providing temporary on-site storage and allowing water resources to be released later in the growing season at a controlled rate. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Water harvesting technology emissions (e.g.green technology). decreases the need for treating and serving water to the community and directly reducing GHG emissions by reducing energy consumption for water providers. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes No Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes F No Lanscape Conservation services help watersheds become more resilient to climate change impacts by providing temporary on-site storage and allowing water resources to be released later in the growing season at a controlled rate. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes F No -- System Reoperation F- Yes r No -- Water Transfers Yes Iv No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r" Yes F*I- No -- Desalination ru Yes F No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes F No -- Recycled Municipal Water F Yes F No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes F No Lanscape Conservation services help watersheds become more resilient to climate change impacts by providing temporary on-site storage and allowing water resources to be released later in the growing season at a controlled rate. Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F No -- Pollution Prevention W Yes F No Landscape Conservation measures reduce erosion control, and keep potentail pollutants from private parcels to remain on site. Salt and Salinity Management r-Yes r No -- Urban Runoff Management F Yes 7 No Landscape Conservation measures reduce erosion control, and keep potentail pollutants from private parcels to remain on site. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes W No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes F No Homeowner re-bate program for Water Pricing) water conservation materials such as rain barrels, rain gardens, and irrigation supplies. Ecosystem Restoration F Yes F No -- Forest Management F Yes No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F_ No Landscape Conservation measures reduce erosion control, and keep potentail pollutants from private parcels to remain on site. Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Recharge Areas Protection r Yes r7, No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes r No -- Watershed Management I✓ Yes r No Landscape Conservation measures reduce erosion control, and keep potentail pollutants from private parcels to remain on site. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes F No Landscape Conservation measures reduce erosion control, and keep potentail pollutants from private parcels to remain on site. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 450000 $112,500 0 562500 OR F- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $120,000 0 0 &M)Maintenance (O b.Can the Project be phased? v Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 306250 80000 Landscape Conservation Technical Assistance Phase 2 256250 40000 Water Conservation and Educational Program Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding 319 Funds $150,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs would be the will be financed for the 25-year planning responsibility of the private property owner. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Planning planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F— Yes R- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The Lake Tahoe TMDL and the EIP will not likely the project is not funded. (300 words or less) have significant pollutant load reductions from the private sector.The TRPA BMP ordinance would also not likely be implemented effectively. We also would also delay opportunities for water conservation and GHG reductions. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and f Yes Watershed needs 1/1/2015 12/1/2018 Evaluation R_ F_, No assessment,technical assistance. IJ N/A b. Final Design r Yes -- -- -- r r No I✓ N/A c. Environmental f Yes -- -- -- Documentation r ( No (CEQA/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting f Yes -- -- -- 7 f No I✓ N/A e. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Contracting F r No N/A f. Construction Yes Program implementation 4/1/2015 12/1/2018 Implementation No including outreach, materials, and best F N/A management practices for residents and landowners, also technical assistance with rain barrels. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is - checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the TRPA Regional Plan, Lake Tahoe Basin Plan, proposed project is consistent with or California Water Plan, Lake Tahoe TMDL, supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, California's Scoping plan for AB 32 GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting Lake Tahoe Technical TMDL, Tahoe RCD the feasibility of this project Community Watershed Partnership Reports. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. The Home Landscaping Guide, the Sediment how much research has been conducted) of Source Control Handbook,the BMP Handbook, the proposed project in 300 words or less. and the Watershed Management Handbook were all based on work performed over the last two decades in the Lake Tahoe Basin.These published resources discuss the importance of private property BMPS, water conservation, and restoration techniques for protecting Lake Tahoe.The TMDL also required stormwater jurisdictions to perform pollutant load reduction analysis using the PLRM. This analysis is presented in the Pollutant Load Reduction Plans submitted as part of the NPDES permit requirements. d. Does the project implement green technology Yes No N/A (e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water r Yes r No N/A Management Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes r No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter Yes No v N/A requirements(CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions ; Yes No v N/A above is "no", do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Have you completed and submitted an F Yes F No F N/A AWMP(due 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an F Yes F No F N/A AWMP prior to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and F Yes F No N/A submitted for the subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 F Yes F No Fv N/A year of the grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Tahoe Resource Conservation District Name of Primary Contact Kim Boyd Name of Secondary Contact Kim Gorman Mailing Address 870 Emerald Bay Rd. Ste. 108, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail kboyd@tahoercd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-1501 ext. 109 Other Cooperating University of California, Davis,Tahoe Environmental Research Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Center Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Analyzing LiDAR data to identify Micro Stormwater Infiltration Systems (MSIS) for the whole Lake Tahoe Basin Project Category i' Restoration ►r Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Recent analysis of LiDAR data and other remotely sensed data in (Briefly describe the project, in Incline Village, South Lake Tahoe, and Tahoma has identified a 300 words or less) potential to develop stormwater detention and infiltration areas based on small-scale patterns of land topography.This information makes it possible to identify the volume of Micro Stormwater Infiltration Systems (MSIS) achievable by small and simple modifications to existing depressions in the landscape (LID). MSIS have the potential to infiltrate urban stormwater and reduce inputs of nutrients and sediments to Lake Tahoe, a key goal of the Lake Tahoe TMDL. This project aims to analyze LiDAR and other remotely sensed data to identify MSIS for the entire Tahoe Basin.This data can overlaid with urban stormwater infrastructure GIS layers to determine hydrologic connectivity in select urban catchments. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 6 of 6 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes,TMDL for Lake Tahoe urban stormwater reduction, EIP for a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, attainment of lake clarity threshold. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related TRPA Regional Plan Update MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.09026 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Longitude: -120.16693 Project Location Description Within the entire Lake Tahoe Basin excluding areas already analyzed (e.g., along the south bank of (Incline Village, South Lake Tahoe,Tahoma). stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Project aims to meet TMDL Storage capacity standards in accordance with the r Yes goals by identifying natural of MSIS,volume attainment date, and participate in r N/A topographic landscape of stormwater the development of future TMDLs. features that could retain retained and/or urban stormwater runoff and infiltrated thus reducing input of nutrients and fine sediment particles to Lake Tahoe. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by MSIS are an LID method for Volume of implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater retention and stormwater stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A infiltration. Storage and retained and/or control/restoration to meet Water infiltration of stormwater will infiltrated Quality Objectives (WQOs)for reduce downstream erosion receiving water bodies established in potential. the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality Coordination of MSIS #of jurisdictions monitoring programs through r Yes throughout the basin, participating,#of planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A promulgate results at basin- conferences/ annually throughout the Region. wide conferences, meetings. meetings with presentations of results. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F_ Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes Utilizing LID enhanced Model pollutants caused by existing and new natural landscape features retained using LID development. r N/A for stormwater retention methods reduces need for new, large impact development. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Identification of feasible LID #of small-scale water-related planning activities r Yes MSIS for potential urban detention basins within the planning horizon as r N/A stormwater runoff, nutrient identified supported by current and future and sediment reduction. watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Project will require regional #of partners,#of multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes collaboration between meetings held Region for information exchange. r N/A jurisdictions and stormwater between partners regulators for successful to share implementation. information IWM3 - Increase public education and Project contains an #of attendees at awareness of watershed functions, r Yes education/outreach HOA/community protection and restoration needs to r N/A component designed to meetings or encourage stewardship by the public. make the public aware of workshops urban landscaping and its effect on the watershed Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4- Promote activities that MSIS collectively have a large #of properties reduce flood risk. F%0 Yes storage and infiltration with reduced F N/A capacity to reduce flood risk, flooding potential especially in areas of localized flooding. IWMS -Address climate change (e.g. With expected increase in #of basins water quality,water supply, r Yes the %of precipitation falling identified as groundwater recharge,flood r N/A as rain instead of snow due suitable for management) in local and regional to climate change, MSIS can stormwater planning efforts and support efforts improve water quality and capture,volume to continue improving the science. reduce flooding by using of stormwater natural landscape features to retained/infiltrate make the watershed more d resilient and reducing dependence on large scale stormwater retention/treatment structures. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Increased stormwater storage capacity climate change3. for increased %of precipitation as rain e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A LID requires less infrastructure, thus emissions (e.g.green technology). less energy to build, use, maintain f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Streetscaping aesthetics: less curb and not already mentioned elsewhere. gutter,fewer large concrete stormwater treatment and retention structures, more natural features 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes F%-o No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes W No -- System Reoperation r- Yes W No -- Water Transfers 7 Yes r No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes F%70 No -- Desalination f— Yes Fy-, No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes F%-o No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes F%70 No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F- Yes Fv- No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes P/ No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r" Yes P/ No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes W No -- Pollution Prevention W Yes r No Identify MSIS that could reduce runoff carrying nutrients and sediments from urban landscape Salt and Salinity Management r Yes FV_ No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes r No Identify MSIS that could retain and infiltrate urban runoff on-site before it can enter Lake Tahoe Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship Yes FV_ No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes F%o- No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration !`"' Yes r%_0 No -- Forest Management r Yes FV_ No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes r No Identify MSIS that could incorporate LID into compact and sustainable development Recharge Areas Protection Yes FV_ No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes W No -- Watershed Management ry-, Yes r No Identify MSIS that could help restore more natural hydrologic conditions Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes r No Identify MSIS that could increase on- site stormwater storage and infiltration capacity Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 100000 $$25,000 0 125000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F,/ Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 62500 0 Analysis of LiDAR and other remotely sensed data for MSIS potential Phase 2 62500 0 Add urban GIS layers to determine connectivity in selected catchments Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding DWR, EPA $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Counties, Landowners will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, conceptual planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W, No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Increased high impact development, increased the project is not funded. (300 words or less) nutrient and sediment input to Lake Tahoe,decline in water quality, increased localized flooding risk, increased erosion 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes Analysis of LiDAR data for 1/1/2015 12/1/2015 Evaluation r W No Tahoe Basin to identify feasible MSIS, storage N/A capacity calculation, add GIS stormwater infrastructure layers to determine hydrologic connectivity in selected catchments b. Final Design r Yes -- -- -- r r No tv— N/A c. Environmental r Yes -- -- -- Documentation r r No (CECI.A/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting !" Yes -- -- -- No N/A e. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Contracting r �` No r N/A f. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Implementation r �` No W N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed TRPA Regional Plan Update, project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Lahontan TMDL Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Schladow, Geoff, Quantifying the feasibility of this project Potential for a Low-Cost, Distributed Stormwater Detention System Using LIDAR and Remotely Sensed Data c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much SNPLMA funded UC Davis research research has been conducted) of the proposed project in project utilized newly acquired 300 words or less. LiDAR data and other remotely sensed data to identify and quantify thepotential to develop stormwater detention and infiltration areas based on small-scale patterns ofland topography. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. iW Yes No F_ N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe LID techniques e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes No v N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements r Yes F No W N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No v N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F_ Yes F_ No Fy-, N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No W N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r Yes F No F,/_ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Tahoe Resource Conservation District Name of Primary Contact Kim Boyd Name of Secondary Contact Kim Gorman Mailing Address 870 Emerald Bay Rd. Ste. 108, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail kboyd@tahoercd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-1501 ext. 109 Other Cooperating Placer and El Dorado County, City of South Lake Tahoe, Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Lahontan Water Board, and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program Project Category F Restoration V Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description This project was developed to provide a sound structure for a (Briefly describe the project, in Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program (RSWMP) and perform 300 words or less) catchment-scale stormwater monitoring, modeling validation, and load estimation to meet TMDL requirements in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Implementation of RSWMP includes an administrative structure, execution of protocols developed for effective urban stormwater monitoring in different locations, and a stormwater database to house monitoring data. These funds would be used to further develop the RSWMP program, continue much needed status and trend monitoring for the Lake Tahoe Watershed, and provided the needed funds to complete a Regional stormwater database available to researchers and the public. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 of 6 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes, this project contributes to TMDL and EIP implementation. It can a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, also help inform data collected as part of the nearshore status and EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so trends project. It will also help to reach the goals establish by the provide description. RSWMP program. Political Support—List related MOU with El Dorado County and Interagency Agreements with Placer MOUs, agreements or TACs County and the City of South Lake Tahoe. There is also a TAC and a currently in place. Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) established for RSWMP. Project Location: Latitude: 39.11710 Longitude: -120.15850 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description RSWMP implementation measures will be executed throughout the (e.g., along the south bank of California side of the Lake Tahoe Basin.The monitoring locations will stream/river between river involve approximately 15-20 stormwater catchment outfalls entering miles or miles from Lake Tahoe. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of Quantification (e.g. address the project linkage to acres of streams/wetlands objective? selected Objective restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL Installation of 3-5 standards in accordance with the r Yes acknowledges urban new monitoring attainment date, and participate in r N/A runoff as the largest stations. the development of future TMDLs. contributor of fine sediments.The RSWMP program was designed to help implement the TMDL and provide information for the Management System. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of Quantification (e.g. address the project linkage to acres of streams/wetlands objective? selected Objective restored or enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality This project was Monitor 15-20 monitoring programs through r Yes developed to provide a stations including planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A sound structure for a BMPs and catchment annually throughout the Region. Regional Stormwater outfalls. Monitoring Program (RSWMP) and to perform catchment-scale stormwater monitoring, modeling validation, and load estimation to meet total maximum daily load (TMDL) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. F%' N/A Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of Quantification (e.g. address the project linkage to acres of streams/wetlands objective? selected Objective restored or enhanced) GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- � Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. I " Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Monitoring stormwater Provide Annual bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes input to surface waters Summary of Findings associated uplands to support healthy r N/A will provide information to Basin Managers to watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife important for identifying help prioritize and plant habitats. impacted riparian or restoration. wetland areas.This type of information is critical for managing watershed activities. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes -- -- � caused by existing and new development. r N/A Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of Quantification (e.g. address the project linkage to acres of streams/wetlands objective? selected Objective restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional This program will provide Annual presentation water-related planning activities r Yes opportunities for regional of findings to the within the planning horizon as r N/A collaboration and Stormwater Quality supported by current and future planning related to Improvement watershed science. stormwater management Committee (SWQIC) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This program will provide At a minimum the multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes opportunities for regional Tahoe RCD will Region for information exchange. r N/A collaboration and facilitate quarterly planning related to meetings with stormwater management jurisdictions and regulators to assist with TMDL implementation goals. IWM3 - Increase public education and This program contains an An annual public awareness of watershed functions, r Yes educational/outreach newsletter and press protection and restoration needs to r N/A component designed to release will be encourage stewardship by the public. make the public aware of distributed. Annual the role of stormwater Stewardship and its impacts to Lake monitoring events Tahoe. will also be held in collaboration with the Pipe Keepers. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes Fv N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A It is projected that we would be working in South Lake Tahoe and the Kings Beach area. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas Iv' N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Developing a functional RSWMP will not already mentioned elsewhere. allow for a model that can be used through out the State of California and the Nations to provide sound methods for collecting and analyzing stormwater data. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency Yes No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local r" Yes id No -- System Reoperation r Yes Wo No -- Water Transfers r Yes F- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F- Yes Fv- No -- Desalination r Yes F%O- No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes Fv- No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes Fv- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes Fv- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r- Yes Fy, No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F%o No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r" Yes 17 No -- Pollution Prevention r" Yes W No -- Salt and Salinity Management F- Yes W No -- Urban Runoff Management Fv- Yes F- No This data will allow for a better understanding of the effectiveness of pollutant control projects. It will also provide useful data for prioritizing management efforts in the watershed. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes I;-W No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes Id No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes Fv- No -- Forest Management r Yes Wo No -- Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Land Use Planning and Management Fv Yes F No This data will allow for a better understanding of the effectiveness of pollutant control projects. It will also provide useful data for prioritizing management efforts in the watershed. Recharge Areas Protection I— Yes FV_ No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes Fv No -- Watershed Management FV_ Yes I— No This data will allow for a better understanding of the effectiveness of pollutant control projects. It will also provide useful data for prioritizing management efforts in the watershed. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes F/_ No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 850000 $$212,500 0 1062500 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes Fy-1 No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 1062500 0 Continue to monitor current 10-12 RSWMP stations and complete database. Construct and monitor 3-5 new monitoring stations. Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project SNPLMA,State $1,500,000 cost Water Board d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding 319 Funds $350,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs There are no O&M costs will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Planning planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes rv- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The Lake Tahoe TMDL will not likely be the project is not funded. (300 words or less) implemented successfully.The EIP program would not have extensive information to support benefits associated with project implementation. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and ry Yes Continued RSWMP 1/1/2015 -- Evaluation r r No monitoring and evaluation r N/A b. Final Design r" Yes -- -- -- r r No tv- N/A c. Environmental r Yes Categorical Exemption 3/1/2015 6/1/2015 Documentation W r No for Monitoring (CEQA/NEPA) r- N/A d. Permitting r Yes -- -- -- r r` No ro N/A e. Construction Yes -- -- -- Contracting r �` No ro N/A f. Construction ry Yes Implementation of 5-6 6/1/2015 12/1/2018 Implementation r W No new monitoring stations ry N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed This project is consistent with the project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Lake Tahoe TMDL,TRPA's Regional Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Plan, the Implementer's Monitoring Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Plan, and the Environmental Improvement Plan for Lake Tahoe b. List technical reports and studies supporting the RSWMP Phase 1 document, the feasibility of this project RSWMP Quality Assurance Project Plan, Focused Stormwater Quality Monitoring to Inform Existing TMDL Tools, and the Lake Tahoe TMDL Technical report. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The Lake Tahoe TMDL was research has been conducted) of the proposed project in constructed by evaluating several 300 words or less. primary source categories including atmospheric deposition, upland/urban runoff, groundwater discharge, and stream channel and shoreline erosion. Urban runoff was determined to account for more than 70%of fine particulates entering Lake Tahoe based on a three year investigation executed as part of TMDL development. Since that time multiple studies have been performed to further develop the TMDL Management System, and the protocols for stormwater monitoring as part of the Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No i" N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No 'd N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes No N/A Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No FV_ N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No FV_ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No W7 N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior r Yes 1-` No V N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the )— Yes r No tv— N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r Yes r No rv- N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Jessica Thompson Name of Secondary Contact Dan Wilkins Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee, CA 96161 E-mail jhompson@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2938 Other Cooperating TDPUD,Truckee Trails, Private Owners,Tahoe Donner Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Association Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Trout Creek Trail Project Category F Restoration V Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The Trout Creek Trail will connect the Tahoe Donner Subdivision (over (Briefly describe the project, in 6,500 properties) in the northern side of Truckee to the Downtown 300 words or less) urban area, provide recreational opportunities, and alternative transportation opportunities. The trail will consist of 2 phases and a connection to an existing Class 1 trail for a total trail length of over 8,000 linear feet. Both phases are currently in the design stages. Phase 1, from Bridge Street in Downtown will connect to the intersection of Euer Valley Road and includes a connection to the existing Class 1 trail to Pioneer Center. Phase 2 will include the section from Northwoods Blvd. to Euer Valley Road. The proposed trail will follow Trout Creek, provides increased opportunity for tourism and recreation. It also protects, conserves and restores physical, cultural, archaeological, historical and living resources, assists the local economy, and enhances public use and enjoyment of lands owned by the public. The trail is included in the Truckee's Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Part of Truckee's Trails and Bikeways Masterplan to provide a a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, walkable and bikeable community EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related Trout Creek Trail Working Group MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location: Latitude: 39.33107 Longitude: -120.18706 Project Location Description Along the north/east side of Trout Creek between Northwoods (e.g., along the south bank of Boulevard and Bridge Street. stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- -- standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) colonization of potential future r N/A invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes The proposed trail will alternative caused by existing and new connect a large existing transportation development. F_ N/A housing development (over option will be 6,500 properties)to the provided to a urban core of Truckee, neighborhood of providing an alternative over 30,000 transportation option which people. will reduce the need for vehicles and improve air quality. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The project will require Trout Creek multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes coordination with Tahoe Working Group, Region for information exchange. r N/A Donner Association,Truckee applicable Donner Public Utility District. permits Phase 2 will require coordination between California Department of Fish and Wildlife,the US Forest Service, and the Town of Truckee. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and The project will build a trail Improved public awareness of watershed functions, r Yes adjacent to Trout Creek. access to Trout protection and restoration needs to r N/A Interpretive signage will be Creek, encourage stewardship by the public. used to educate the public interpretive signs, about the Truckee River public meetings. water quality issues as well as biological and historical resources along the river. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes Fv N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Use of trails for walking and Provides an water quality,water supply, r Yes riding bicycles reduces alternative groundwater recharge,flood r N/A vehicle use and provides a transportation management) in local and regional measurable air quality route for over planning efforts and support efforts benefit and climate change 6,500 properties to continue improving the science. benefit. (30,000 people), to the urban core of Truckee. Provides climate change education and stewardship opportunities with interpretive signs. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Lahontan Basin Plan beneficial uses supported by the project include REC-1 Water Contact Recreation, and REC-2 Noncontact Water Recreation. Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Project will provide alternative climate change3. transportation modes to community. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Project will provide alternative emissions(e.g.green technology). transportation modes to community. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r- N/A Provides recreational opportunities not already mentioned elsewhere. along Trout Creek 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency )— Yes Fv- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r' Yes P No -- System Reoperation r Yes F%-o No -- Water Transfers Yes F%-O No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes F,/_ No -- Desalination r Yes F,/_ No -- Precipitation Enhancement Yes FV_ No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes FV_ No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local !"' Yes F%o- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes F%o No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F%o- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use Yes r No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes r- No Project construction phases will implement Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans. Salt and Salinity Management Yes rv- No -- Urban Runoff Management !`"' Yes F%o- No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes I;_7 No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F%o Yes F_ No The proposed trail will follow Trout Water Pricing) Creek, provides increased opportunity for tourism and recreation. It also protects, conserves and restores physical, cultural, archaeological, historical and living resources, assists the local economy, and enhances Ecosystem Restoration Yes tv- No -- Forest Management r- Yes Fy-, No -- Land Use Planning and Management W Yes F_ No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes FV_ No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes f- No Project will provide visual access to Trout Creek. Watershed Management r Yes F%-o No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes Fy-, No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 4000000 $$- 0 5000000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $30,000 0 30000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F,/ Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 2000000 15000 Bridge Street to Euer Valley Road Phase 2 2000000 15000 Northwoods Boulevard to Euer Valley Road Phase 3 0 0 0 Phase 4 0 0 0 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project TSSA#1, RSTP, LTF $4,000,000 cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Various Grants- $1,000,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. uncertain e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Will be programmed in Town of Truckee annual will be financed for the 25-year planning operational and Capital Improvement Program period for project implementation (not grant budget. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Engineer's Estimate planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes rv- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Project will be constructed as funds allow the project is not funded. (300 words or less) 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes -- -- -- Evaluation r No r N/A b. Final Design Yes Final design is in process 6/1/2014 -- P-0 r No for Phase 1. Phase 2 is in 30%design N/A c. Environmental r Yes Draft Environmental Doc 11/1/201 2/1/2014 Documentation I1 r No is completed. 3 (CEQA/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting r Yes Both Phases require 11/1/201 4/1/2014 V r No Construction General 3 Permit, Phase 2 will r N/A require 401/404 and Fish and Wildlife authorization e. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Contracting Io No N/A f. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Implementation �— ry No r— N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is Final Design, Environmental Documentation and permitting can occur checked as current status simultaneously. Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee Trails and Bikeways Master project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plan Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the A wetland delineation, listed and feasibility of this project sensitive species assessment, historic properties report, and conceptual alignment have been completed for the project. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. :y, Yes F No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Potentially recycled material in pavement. Low impact development techniques along trail e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No rv- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes No rv- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F- Yes - No W N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No v N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No W N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No v N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No N/A subject basin? Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No W N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Becky Bucar Name of Secondary Contact Todd Landry Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee, CA 96161 E-mail bbucar@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2932 Other Cooperating Truckee River Watershed Council,Truckee Donner Recreation Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders and Park District,Truckee Development Associates Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Trout Creek Restoration Project Category P Restoration v, Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The Trout Creek Restoration Project would restore 5 reaches of Trout (Briefly describe the project, in Creek between the Union Pacific Railroad property located 300 words or less) immediately north of the Truckee River and the culvert that travels under Interstate 80 north ofJibboom Street. Reaches 2 and 3 are complete. Construction of Reach 1 would remove the existing concrete channel that travels between Donner Pass Road and Jibboom Street adjacent to property owned by the Truckee Donner Recreation and Park District and the Assumption Catholic Church. Construction of the first phase of Reach 1 (between Donner Pass Road and School Street) is planned to occur in Summer 2014. Reaches 4 and 5 run primarily through land that is planned to be developed through the Railyard Master Plan and will require the relocation of the Union Pacific Railroad balloon track. Construction of these reaches (as well as Phase 2 of Reach 1) is dependent on the availability of funding. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to All phases are included in this template. a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related -- MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location: Latitude: 39.33107 Longitude: -120.18710 Project Location Description Along Trout Creek between Union Pacific Railroad property (e.g., along the south bank of immediately north of the Truckee River and Interstate 80. stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Restoration of Trout Creek Sediment load. standards in accordance with the r Yes will reduce sediment load to attainment date, and participate in r N/A the Truckee River. the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Restoration of Trout Creek Sediment load. implementing measures such as r Yes will reduce sediment load to stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A the Truckee River. control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, The project will restore the Acres of restored wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes ecological function of the creek.Acres of to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A creek.Wetlands will be wetland. processes. created in Reaches 4 and 5. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future r Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water The project will restore the Acres of riparian bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes ecological function of the and wetland area associated uplands to support healthy r N/A creek.Wetlands will be created. watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife created in Reaches 4 and 5. and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. FV N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes Region for information exchange. r N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and There is an opportunity for Number of awareness of watershed functions, r Yes interpretive signage along the interpretive signs. protection and restoration needs to F N/A restoration project. encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that The project will contain the Remapped reduce flood risk. Fv Yes 100-year flood flows.The floodplain. F N/A area currently floods during large storm events. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Trout Creek drains to the Truckee considerations. River,which terminates in Pyramid Lake, located within the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Reservation. Reductions in sediment loads benefits this as well as the fisheries including Lahontan Cutthroat Trout. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A -- climate change3. Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A The project would include the emissions (e.g.green technology). installation of vegetation that would help lower the watertemperature to improve the cold water habitat of the creek. In addition, plants removecarbon dioxide from the air through carbon sequestration. Therefore, as the project willinstall a substantial amount of vegetation as a part of the restoration effort, it will helpslow the growth of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Provide flood protection and restores not already mentioned elsewhere. ecological function of creek. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes W No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F Yes F,/- No -- System Reoperation r Yes Fv- No -- Water Transfers Yes F%O- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F- Yes Fv- No -- Desalination r Yes FY-1 No -- Precipitation Enhancement F- Yes Fv- No -- Recycled Municipal Water F- Yes Fv- No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local !"' Yes FV_ No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r" Yes P0 No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes Fv- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes FV_ No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes F No Project will implement erosion control measures and will reduce sediment load to the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes FV_ No -- Urban Runoff Management Fv- Yes F No Project will include facilities to treat urban runoff. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes l;� No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes FV_ No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration tv— Yes r No Restores ecological function of the creek. Forest Management r Yes FV_ No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes FV_ No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes Fy-, No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes I— No Project will provide visual access to Trout Creek. Watershed Management F_ Yes FV_ No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management FV_ Yes F_ No Project will provide 100-year flood protection. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 13100000 $$300,000 800000 14200000 OR F- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $40,000 0 20000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F,/ Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 1200000 10000 Reach 1, Phase 1 Phase 2 2500000 10000 Reach 1, Phase 2 Phase 3 10500000 20000 Reaches 4 and 5 Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Supplemental Prop $800,000 cost 50 d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Various Grants- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. uncertain e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Will be programmed in Town of Truckee annual will be financed for the 25-year planning operational and Capital Improvement Program period for project implementation (not grant budget. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual. planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Project will not be constructed. the project is not funded. (300 words or less) 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes -- -- -- Evaluation Wo r No r N/A b. Final Design r Yes Design for Reach 1, Phase -- -- W W No 1 is nearing completion. 50%design is complete N/A for Reach 1, Phase 2. 30% design is complete for Reaches 4 and 5. c. Environmental F,/_ Yes CEQA Mitigated Negative -- -- Documentation �. r No Declaration for Reaches (CEQA/NEPA) 1-3 is complete. N/A d. Permitting l/ Yes Reach 2 and Reach 3 -- -- r !" No complete. N/A e. Construction r Yes Reach 2 and Reach 3 -- -- Contracting r W/ No complete. N/A f. Construction r Yes Reach 2 and Reach 3 -- -- Implementation �— Wv No complete. r— N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is Construction of Reach 2 and 3 is complete. Monitoring of Reach 3 will checked as current status continue through 2014. Construction of Reach 1, Phase 1 is to occur in 2014. Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed General Plan, Railyard Master Plan project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Trout Creek Restoration Design feasibility of this project Report. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The Trout Creek Restoration Design research has been conducted) of the proposed project in Report is a comprehensive report 300 words or less. that analyzed ecological function, floodplains, wetlands, history, and biological species in the development of the 30% design for all reaches (1 through 5).The 30% design was prepared by Swanson Hydrology and Geomorphology, afirm that specializes in restoration design. A Trout Creek Restoration Project—Phase 1 Preliminary Design Report has been prepared, as well as existingconditions wetland delineation. A Trout Creek Hydrology report was alsoprepared to estimate design flows. Finally, Swanson used the HEC-RAS modelto determine pre and post-project 100-year floodplain. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The project will incorporate Low Impact Development design where possible. Also,vegetation that is removed as a part of construction can be salvaged and transplantedback into the final project. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No W N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No rv- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes No Po N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes r No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No F,7 N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No W7 N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Becky Bucar Name of Secondary Contact Todd Landry Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee, CA 96161 E-mail bbucar@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2932 Other Cooperating US Forest Service, Placer County, California Department of Fish Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders and Wildlife Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Truckee River Legacy Trail Project Category F Restoration v, Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The Truckee River Legacy Trail will connect Donner Lake to the (Briefly describe the project, in Glenshire Subdivision in the eastern side of Truckee. Three phases of 300 words or less) the trail are complete (Phase 1, 2, and 3A). Phase 3B will be complete in 2014. Phase 4 and Phase 5 are still in the preliminary planning and design stages.The project provides increased opportunity for tourism and recreation. It also protects, conserves and restores physical, cultural, archaeological, historical and living resources, assists the local economy, and enhances public use and enjoyment of lands owned by the public. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 4 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Phases 1-3 B are near completion. Phase 4 is the next phase. a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related -- MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.32496 Longitude: -120.18730 Project Location Description Along the south side of the Truckee River between Brockway Road (e.g., along the south bank of and SR 89. stream/river between river miles or miles from Tahoe Sierra IRWM Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- -- standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State I� N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future r Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and V N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes Project will include BMPs and -- caused by existing and new Erosion Control measures. development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The project will require Meet twice a multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes coordination with Placer year. Region for information exchange. r N/A County for connections to their planned trail along the Truckee River. Phase 4 will require coordination between California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the US Forest Service, and the Town of Truckee. IWM3 - Increase public education and The project will build a trail Number of awareness of watershed functions, r Yes adjacent to the Truckee interpretive signs protection and restoration needs to r N/A River. Interpretive signage and number of encourage stewardship by the public. will be used to educate the public meetings. public about the Truckee River water quality issues as well as biological and historical resources along the river. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. W Yes r- N/A Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWMS -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A The trail provides opportunities to considerations. interpret native american sites. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r" N/A According to the map,the trail will serve disadvantaged communities along SR 89. c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Project will provide alternative climate change3. transportation modes to community. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Project will provide alternative emissions (e.g.green technology). transportation modes to community. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Provides recreational opportunities not already mentioned elsewhere. along the Truckee River. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency )— Yes Fv- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency )— Yes F%-O No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes Fv- No -- System Reoperation r Yes Fy-, No -- Water Transfers F- Yes F%-o No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F- Yes F%-O No -- Desalination I— Yes F%-o No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes F%o- No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes F%o- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/Local Yes F%O- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F- Yes F%o No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation Yes Fv- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F%o No -- Pollution Prevention Fv- Yes F- No Project construction phases will implement Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans. Salt and Salinity Management Yes F%O- No -- Urban Runoff Management r" Yes Fy, No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes F%o- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F- Yes Fv- No -- Water Pricing) Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Ecosystem Restoration r- Yes Fv- No -- Forest Management r" Yes F,/- No -- Land Use Planning and Management r" Yes FV_ No -- Recharge Areas Protection r- Yes Fy-, No -- Water-dependent Recreation Yes 1— No Project will provide visual access to Truckee River. Watershed Management Yes F%_0 No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management fi` Yes FV_ No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage-CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 4000000 $$- 0 4000000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $30,000 0 30000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F,/ Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 2000000 15000 Brockway Road to Truckee River Crossing Phase 2 2000000 15000 Truckee River Crossing to West River Street Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Various Grants- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. uncertain e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Will be programmed in Town of Truckee annual will be financed for the 25-year planning operational and Capital Improvement Program period for project implementation (not grant budget. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual. planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Project will not be constructed. the project is not funded. (300 words or less) 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes -- -- -- Evaluation r r No r N/A b. Final Design r Yes -- -- -- Iv- No N/A c. Environmental r Yes -- -- -- Documentation r No (CEQA/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting r Yes -- -- -- r ry No r N/A e. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Contracting r PO No r N/A f. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Implementation r P No r N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee Trails and Bikeways Master project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plan Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the A wetland delineation, listed and feasibility of this project sensitive species assessment, historic properties report, and conceptual alignment have been completed for the project. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. ;�O Yes i No F' N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Potentially recycled material in pavement. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No F%-O N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? I— Yes I— No Id N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes - No P N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", i Yes F- No P/ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No v N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No d N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No F%,- N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the Yes No V N/A grant submittal date? Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Beth Christman Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568 Truckee, CA 96162 E-mail bchristman@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 Other Cooperating U.S. Forest Service -Tahoe National Forest Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Dry Creek Restorations Project Category P Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The Dry Creek restoration project involves restoration of streams and (Briefly describe the project, in meadows in the Dry Creek watershed. A watershed assessment was 300 words or less) completed in 2013 that outlined a Restoration Plan for the Dry Creek watershed. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 5 of 7- restoration project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes- Restoration Project identified through the Dry Creek Watershed a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Assessment (TRWC, 2013) EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related Cooperating agreement with U.S. Forest Service MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.43361 Longitude: -120.11580 Project Location Description The project includes restoration of the mainstem of Dry Creek, 4 (e.g., along the south bank of tributaries to the mainstem, and associated uplands. Dry Creek is stream/river between river located north of the Town of Truckee, and drains to Boca Reservoir. miles or miles from The residential community of Russel Valley is located in Dry Creek. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The project helps meet TMDL Estimated standards in accordance with the r Yes standards by reducing sediment load attainment date, and participate in r N/A sediment loading to the reduction up to the development of future TMDLs. Truckee River.The Truckee 100 tons/year River is 303(d) listed for excess sediment and a TMDL has been adopted (LRWQCB, 2008). WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The seven projects identified Two miles of implementing measures such as r Yes by the Restoration Plan actively eroding stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A would decrease erosion perennial stream control/restoration to meet Water through restoration. The channel Quality Objectives (WQOs)for Truckee River is 303(d) listed treatedThree receiving water bodies established in for excess sediment. The miles of actively the Basin Plan within the planning projects will help meet the eroding horizon. WQO for turbidity in the intermittent LittleTruckee River HU. stream channel treatedDrainage improved on 35 miles of roads150 acres of meadows restored WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate i;_7 N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Restoration actions focus on Two miles of wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes restoring incised streams to actively eroding to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A stable channels on the perennial stream processes. meadow surface to improve channel infiltration through increased treatedThree overbank flow. miles of actively eroding intermittent stream channel treated150 acres of meadows restored WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- ly Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. rv- N/A Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. r- Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Fv N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Watershed function, wildlife Two miles of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes habitat, and instream habitat actively eroding associated uplands to support healthy r N/A will be restored through perennial stream watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife implementation of the Dry channel and plant habitats. Creek Restoration Plan. treatedThree miles of actively eroding intermittent stream channel treated150 acres of meadows restored ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and V N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with The Dry Creek Restoration 3,500 acres of public and private landowners, r Yes Plan is coordinated with forest evaluated activities to manage forest health and r N/A forest management activities for management wildfire risks. to improve forest health and reduce the risk of fire. The forest management plan will be completed by the U.S. Forest Service. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F_ Yes caused by existing and new development. F%' N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Dry Creek restoration will Collaboration multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes take place in collaboration with one partner Region for information exchange. r,. N/A with the U.S. Forest Service organization IWM3 - Increase public education and We will engage the public Two site tours, 10 awareness of watershed functions, r Yes through site tours and hands- people per protection and restoration needs to r N/A on workdays. Revegetation tourTwo years of encourage stewardship by the public. will take place on Truckee Truckee River Day River Day-an annual projects, 20 volunteer work day. people per year IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes Fv N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood Fv N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A More resilient watersheds will be climate change3. better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. Restoring meadows and stream channels in the Dry Creek watershed would provide enormous benefit through better flood flow attenuation as precipitation shifts from snow to rain. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency i— Yes I;-o� No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency i— Yes F%O- No -- Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes F%O_ No -- System Reoperation r Yes F%O- No -- Water Transfers F_ Yes Fv- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater Yes F%o- No -- Desalination r Yes F%o- No -- Precipitation Enhancement F_ Yes FV_ No -- Recycled Municipal Water I— Yes FV_ No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes F,/_ No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes PO No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes P/ No -- Matching Water Quality to Use t" Yes FV_ No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes F No The Truckee River is listed as impaired for excess sediment. The project will reduce the sediment load to the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management Yes 1v No -- Urban Runoff Management 1- Yes r- No The project includes improving drainages on the road system in Dry Creek. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship ry-, Yes r No Portions of Dry Creek are included in an active grazing allotment. Restoration will improve the quality of forage available. Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes F%o- No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration Fv Yes F_ No The project will result in ecosystem processes through restoring wetlands, stream channels, meadows, and upland areas. Forest Management F%o- Yes F_ No Forest management will be completed in conjunction with the Dry Creek restoration project. Land Use Planning and Management Yes FV_ No -- Recharge Areas Protection r- Yes P No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes FV_ No -- Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Watershed Management Fv Yes F_ No The Dry Creek Watershed Assessment resulted in a Restoration Plan for effective watershed management. We are proposing to implement the Restoration Plan. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management I— Yes F%_0 No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 450000 $$265,000 0 665000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $2,000 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P/ Yes i— No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 400000 0 Restoration of four tributary stream Phase 2 200000 0 Restoration of main channel Phase 3 65000 0 Treatment of road drainage Phase 4 0 2000 Road maintenance-average annual cost. Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Bella Vista $265,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Foundation (applied), National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (applied), U.S. Forest Service internal funds (applied) e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operations and maintenance costs will be minimal. will be financed for the 25-year planning Every 5 years, some maintenance on the existing period for project implementation (not grant road will take place,which is covered by Forest funded). Service operations budgets. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Assessment and Concept Design planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes 15,71 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Meadow degradation and water quality impacts the project is not funded. (300 words or less) will continue. Implementation costs will rise as degradation becomes more severe. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F%O- Yes The Dry Creek Watershed -- -- Evaluation r r No Assessment was completed in 2013. F N/A Restoration actions were identified. b. Final Design F_ Yes Final Design is needed for -- -- r P/ No all restoration projects and will start in 2014. F_ N/A c. Environmental r Yes NEPA will be completed -- -- Documentation No in early 2014. (CECI,A/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting r Yes -- -- -- No N/A e. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Contracting W/ No N/A f. Construction r" Yes -- -- -- Implementation W No r- N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is NEPA and final design are taking place concurrently. checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Dry Creek Watershed Assessment project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General (TRWC, 2013). Coordinated Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Watershed Management Strategy, Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) updated project list (TRWC, 2014). Sierra Nevada Meadows Business Plan (NFWF, 2010). b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Dry Creek Watershed Assessment feasibility of this project (TRWC, 2013). c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The projects were identified and research has been conducted) of the proposed project in design concepts proposed in the 300 words or less. Restoration Plan contained in the Dry Creek Watershed Assessment (TRWC, 2013). Detailed design and analysis will take place in the next phase. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No i;-oF N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F- Yes F- No FV- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes F- No FV- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements r Yes F No Fv N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F- Yes F- No P/ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due I— Yes i— No FV- N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No W N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r Yes F No F,/_ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Jeannette Halderman Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568,Truckee, CA 96162 E-mail jhalderman@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 ext. 6 Other Cooperating Tahoe City PUD, US Forest Service LTBMU Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title First 4 Mile Restoration Project Project Category R Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The proposed project will protect and restore 1,000 lineal feet of (Briefly describe the project, in stream bank, riparian and wet meadow habitat (and/or totaling up to 300 words or less) 1.5 acres) along the Truckee River adjacent to highway 89S, previously disturbed by pedestrians recreating on the river and the bike trail, through directed access, signage, and restoration. As a result of restoration activities, the project will ultimately reduce sedimentation and erosion along the Truckee River. It will provide conservation and protection for approximately 1,000 lineal feet of river. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 7, restoration project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to EIP,Truckee River Corridoor Access Plan,Truckee River TMDL, a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River Watershed Coordinated EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so Watershed Management Strategy provide description. Political Support—List related MOU/Contract Tahoe City PUD, TRWC, USFS MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.16354 Longitude: -120.16810 Project Location Description Along the east bank of the Truckee River to the edge of bike path, (e.g., along the south bank of between 1.5 miles from Tahoe City to 0.5 miles before Alpine stream/river between river Meadows Road. miles or miles from Tahoe Sierra IRWM Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project will reduce Approximately implementing measures such as r Yes sedimentation created by 1.5 acres of stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A erosion by pedestrian river stream bank control/restoration to meet Water access impacts, along along the Truckee Quality Objectives (WQOs)for approximately 1,000 lineal River receiving water bodies established in feet of the Truckee River, the Basin Plan within the planning thus improving water quality. horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future r Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and V N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- caused by existing and new r Yes development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among TRWC will work with USFS 1.5 acres multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes and other land owners. Region for information exchange. r N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and Educational signs, involve 1.5 acres awareness of watershed functions, r Yes public on community work protection and restoration needs to r N/A days. encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes Fv N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Improve water quality and 1.5 acres water quality,water supply, r Yes habitat quality. groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A The project will improve bank climate change3. stabilization and habitat resilience to impacts from climate change such as increased precipitation and flows. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A The project will increase vegetative emissions(e.g.green technology). cover. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A The project will benefit wildlife habitat not already mentioned elsewhere. and recreational use. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes F,/- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency 1— Yes Fv- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local t— Yes r No -- System Reoperation F Yes W No -- Water Transfers r Yes rv- No -- Increase Water Supply L. Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes rv- No -- Desalination r Yes r,07 No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes rv- No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes rv- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes r No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes -- No Will improve water quality downstream. Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F,/- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F- No Will support Beneficial Uses of the Truckee River per the Lahontan Basin Plan Pollution Prevention r Yes - No Truckee River TMDL attainment Salt and Salinity Management r Yes :d No -- Urban Runoff Management Io Yes r No Captures stormwater from adjacent Highway 89S Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes r No -- Economic Incentives(Loans, Grants,and r Yes r No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration W Yes r No Wetland, meadow, instream habitat Forest Management r Yes W No -- Land Use Planning and Management r" Yes ry-, No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Recharge Areas Protection F Yes ,v No -- Water-dependent Recreation P/ Yes --' No Will improve river banks and provide areas for rafters to get in and out of the river. Watershed Management I Yes No Will improve wildlife habitat and water quality. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes W No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 360000 $$50,000 0 410000 OR F_ DAC 2. Annual Operations and 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F,/ Yes F_ No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 35000 0 Planning& Design Phase 2 265000 0 Implementation Phase 3 60000 0 Post-Implementation Monitoring(3 Years) Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Truckee River Fund $50,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs USFS and Tahoe City PUD have standing operation will be financed for the 25-year planning and maintenance agreements period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Lack of TMDL attainment,continued erosion and the project is not funded. (300 words or less) increased sedimentation into the Truckee River; loss of native habitat and potential impact to bike trail 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes Initial assessment of 9/1/2014 12/1/2014 Evaluation r ry No project area as part of the Truckee River r N/A Corridor Access Plan. Additional tasks include resource studies, wetland delineation. b. Final Design r Yes Develop construction 2/1/2015 4/1/2015 W W No documents. N/A c. Environmental r Yes Part of Truckee River 9/1/2014 12/1/2014 Documentation W r No Access Plan project- (CEQA/NEPA) CEQA expected to be r N/A completed May 2014 d. Permitting r Yes LRQCB, CDFW, USFWS, 12/1/201 4/1/2015 F_ W No Corps, USFS 4 F_ N/A e. Construction r Yes Construction documents 4/1/2015 6/1/2015 Contracting r W No to bid; award contract. r' N/A f. Construction !" Yes -- 7/1/2015 10/1/2015 Implementation F_ WO No r N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is Phase 3 will include 3 years of Post-Implementation Monitoring to checked as current status assess the success of the restoration efforts and address any remediation or maintenance needs to meed success criteria. Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed EIP,Truckee River Corridoor Access project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plan, Truckee River TMDL, Lahontan Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Basin Plan,Truckee River Watershed Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Coordinated Watershed Management Strategy b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Truckee River Corridor Access Plan, feasibility of this project First 4 Mile Hydrologic Study c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much We are currently working on the research has been conducted) of the proposed project in First 4 Mile Restoration Project that 300 words or less. includes restoration of approximately 1.75 acres in this proposed project area; similar conditions are present in the proposed project and similar restoration techniques will be applied. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe We use on site and natural materials including logs, boulders, willow cuttings/poles/stakes, live willow/brush mattresses, etc. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes F- No FV- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements i Yes F- No W N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No N/A 12/31/12)? Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior r Yes r No rv- N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No W N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the Yes r No rv- N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Beth Christman Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568,Truckee CA, 96162 E-mail bchristman@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 Other Cooperating Truckee Donner Land Trust, U.S. Forest Service Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Johnson Canyon Restoration Project Category P Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Johnson Canyon (formerly known as Negro Canyon) is located in the (Briefly describe the project, in Donner Lake watershed. The naturally erosive watershed has a long 300 words or less) history of human use which has resulted in altered hydrology. TRWC and partners will implement restoration to reduce erosion, and improve water quality and habitat. Restoration actions include re- connecting disrupted drainages to restore natural hydrology, improving drainage on existing roads and trails, and revegetation as appropriate. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 of 7, restoration project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes. This is phase two of the restoration work identified in the Negro a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Canyon Watershed Assessment (TRWC, 2008). Phase one work will be EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so completed in 2014. provide description. Political Support—List related Signed agreement with the Truckee Donner Land Trust MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.33694 Longitude: -120.29420 Project Location Description Johnson Canyon is a tributary to Donner Lake. The canyon drains to (e.g., along the south bank of the northwest side of the lake. Restoration work is focussed on the stream/river between river area of the watershed north of Interstate 80. This phase of the miles or miles from project addresses the west side of the canyon. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The project helps meet TMDL Estimated annual standards in accordance with the r Yes standards by reducing sediment load attainment date, and participate in r N/A sediment loading to the reduction for the development of future TMDLs. Truckee River.The Truckee project—75 River is 303(d) listed for tons/year excess sediment and a TMDL has been adopted (LRWQCB, 2008). WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The project involves restoring Drainage implementing measures such as r Yes three major erosion sites and improved on one stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A treating erosive dirt roads in mile of control/restoration to meet Water the Truckee River watershed. roadEstimated Quality Objectives (WQOs)for The Truckee River is 303(d) annual sediment receiving water bodies established in listed for excess sediment. load reduction for the Basin Plan within the planning The project will help meet project—75 horizon. the WQO for turbidity in the tons/year Truckee River HU. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Restoration actions focus 1,250 feet of wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes restoring natural hydrologic stream corridor to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A patterns to reduce sediment improvedOne processes. delivery to streams. acre of upland Restoration will improve restored aquatic and riparian habitat as well as upland areas. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future r Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water The project goal is to restore 1,250 feet of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes natural hydrologic function stream corridor associated uplands to support healthy r N/A to improve watershed health. improvedOne watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife The project will improve acre of upland and plant habitats. aquatic, riparian, and upland restored habitat. Johnson Canyon is critical habitat for the Truckee-Loyalton deer herd. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F_ Yes caused by existing and new development. Fv N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The project will be completed Collaboration multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes as a collaboration between between three Region for information exchange. r N/A the U.S. Forest Service, organizations Truckee Donner Land Trust, and TRWC. IWM3 - Increase public education and We will engage the public Four Site Tours, awareness of watershed functions, r Yes through site tours and hands- 10 people per protection and restoration needs to r N/A on workdays. Revegetation tourTwo years of encourage stewardship by the public. will take place on Truckee Truckee River Day River Day-an annual projects, 50 volunteer work day. people per year Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes Fv N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. I, N/A -- c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A -- Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A More resilient watersheds will be climate change3. better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. In rain on snow events, sediment production from Johnson Canyon is severe due to altered hydrologic patterns. Restoring the natural hydrology and improving riparian and upland habitat will reduce erosion. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A The project will increase vegetative emissions(e.g.green technology). cover. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes F%-O No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes F%o- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes P7 No -- System Reoperation r Yes F%-O No -- Water Transfers r' Yes P No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r- Yes rv- No -- Desalination F- Yes Fv- No -- Precipitation Enhancement F- Yes P0 No -- Recycled Municipal Water F- Yes F%O- No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r" Yes FV_ No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r" Yes P0 No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes Fv- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes FV_ No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes r No The Truckee River is listed as impaired for excess sediment. The project will reduce the sediment load to the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management r" Yes rV7 No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes Io No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r" Yes FV_ No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r" Yes FV_ No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F_ No The project will restore ecosystem processes through restoring natural hydrologic patterns, reducing erosion, and improving riparian and upland habitat. Forest Management r Yes FV_ No -- Land Use Planning and Management r" Yes Fv- No -- Recharge Areas Protection r" Yes F%-o No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes FV_ No -- Watershed Management lY, Yes r No A watershed assessment and restoration plan was completed for the entire Johnson Canyon watershed. We are implementing the management measures identified in the assessment as funding allows. Johnson Canyon is specifically identified by the Truckee River Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management I— Yes FV_ No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 225000 $$75,000 0 300000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $2,000 0 2000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F,/ Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 65000 0 Final Project Design and permitting Phase 2 235000 0 Construction Phase 3 0 2000 Road maintenance-average annual cost. Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding U.S. Forest Service- $75,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. likely cost share e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operations and maintenance costs will be minimal. will be financed for the 25-year planning Every 5 years, some maintenance on the existing period for project implementation (not grant road will take place,which is covered by Forest funded). Service operations budgets. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Project cost is based upon Phase 1 construction and planning, bid, etc.) design costs and concept plans.A cost benefit analysis was completed for Phase 1,which is largely transferable to Phase 2 work. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes r- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Severe erosion will continue. Every year that the project is not funded. (300 words or less) restoration is delayed in Johnson Canyon increases implementation costs due to the increase in damage. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and FV_ Yes Assessment was -- -- Evaluation r r No completed (Negro Canyon Watershed N/A Assessment,TRWC 2008). b. Final Design !" Yes Concept design is 6/1/2015 12/1/2017 W W No completed (TRWC, 2008). Final design is necessary !` N/A to determine cut and fill quantities, construction access, and final cost. c. Environmental FV_ Yes CEQA was completed for -- -- Documentation r r No Phase 1, it will be (CEQA/NEPA) updated for Phase 2. N/A d. Permitting r Yes Additional permits will be -- -- FV_ No required for Phase 2. F_ N/A e. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Contracting r W No r� N/A f. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Implementation F_ W No r N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is Phase 1 Restoration of Johnson Canyon will be completed in 2014. This checked as current status project template describes work for Phase 2. Phase 2 work will start as soon as funding is secured. Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Johnson Canyon (aka Negro Canyon) project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General is identified in the Truckee River Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Sediment TMDL Staff Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Report(LRWQCB, 2008, Section 10- 3), as well as the Coordinated Watershed Management Strategy, (TRWC 2004, Ch. 5). b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Negro Canyon Watershed feasibility of this project Assessment (TRWC, 2008, Ch. 5). Johnson Canyon Phase 1 Design Plan (TRWC, 2014). c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Road treatments are based on FS research has been conducted) of the proposed project in standards proven to reduce 300 words or less. sediment productions from roads (e.g.Gucinski et al., 2001). Restoration practices will be based upon project success of Phase 1 work in the eastern portion of the Johnson Canyon watershed. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Native vegetation and on-site materials will be used for construction. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes F_ No W N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F_ Yes F_ No P/ N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F_ Yes F_ No FV_ N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No W N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No W7 N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the r Yes F No W N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No P/ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Beth Christman Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568,Truckee CA 96162 E-mail bchristman@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 Other Cooperating Truckee Donner Land Trust Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Lacey Meadows Restoration Project Category P Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Lacey Meadows is a large meadow complex in the Upper Little (Briefly describe the project, in Truckee River drainage. Widespread disturbance throughout the 300 words or less) watershed has resulted in altered hydrology, habitat degradation, and water quality impacts. Through the Lacey Meadows Assessment (TRWC, 2013), eight restoration and management recommendations were made to improve watershed condition.This Project Template includes three restoration projects from the assessment. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 7 of 7, restoration project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to This project addresses three of the eight restoration and management a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, recommendations identified in the Lacey Meadows Assessment. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related The Lacey Meadows Assessment was completed under an agreement MOUs, agreements or TACs with the Truckee Donner Land Trust. This agreement will continue currently in place. through implementation. Project Location: Latitude: 39.47472 Longitude: -120.41810 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description Lacey Meadows includes the area to the south of Webber Lake, in the (e.g., along the south bank of Upper Little Truckee River watershed. Specific project locations stream/river between river include the Lower Meadow(adjacent to Webber Lake),the Upper miles or miles from Meadow(south of the lower meadow, along Lacey Creek), and along Towns/intersection and/or Meadow Lake and Lacey Meadows roads. address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The project will reduce Address sediment implementing measures such as r Yes erosion in the Truckee River sources along 4.5 stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A watershed, which is 303(d) miles of road with control/restoration to meet Water listed for excess sediment. connectivity to Quality Objectives (WQOs)for Sediment reductions attained stream receiving water bodies established in by the project will help meet coursesMove the Basin Plan within the planning the turbidity WQO for the 2,500 feet of horizon. Little Truckee River stream from Hydrologic unit. eroding channel to stable alignmentReduce erosion along 2,000 feet of lower Lacey Creek WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, The Lacey Meadows project 4,500 feet of wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes includes restoration of stream to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A approximately 4,500 feet of restoreclFive processes. incised and eroding streams. acres In Upper Lacey Meadows, riparian/wetland flow will be returned to 2,500 habitat restored feet of stable remnant channels. This will reduce erosion, promote riparian habitat development and allow water to spread over the floodplain. In Lower Lacey Meadows, approximately 2,000 feet of stream is highly incised and actively eroding. Connectivity with the floodplain will be re- established to promote wetland and riparian habitat development, and improve infiltration. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of W N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably F_ Yes supply water. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- r` Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. W N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Lacey Meadows is a 4,500 feet of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes biologically rich area (TRWC, stream associated uplands to support healthy r N/A 2013). Restoration will restored Five watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife improve fish habitat through acres and plant habitats. reducing erosion, and riparian/wetland promote riparian habitat habitat restored development. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- caused by existing and new r Yes development. V N/A Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Lacey Meadows restoration Collaboration multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes will take place in partnership between four Region for information exchange. r N/A with the Truckee Donner organizations. Land Trust,the U.S. Forest Service, The Nature Conservancy, and TRWC. IWM3 - Increase public education and We will engage the public Four Site Tours, awareness of watershed functions, r Yes through site tours and hands- 10 people per protection and restoration needs to r N/A on workdays. Revegetation tourThree years encourage stewardship by the public. will take place on Truckee of Truckee River River Day-an annual Day projects, 20 volunteer work day. people per year IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes V N/A IWMS -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A More resilient watersheds will be climate change3. better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. Restoring a large headwater meadow like Lacey Meadows would provide enormous benefit through better flood flow attenuation as precipitation shifts from snow to rain. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes No -- Urban Water Use EfficiencyI Yes No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local r Yes Fv- No -- System Reoperation r Yes Wo No -- Water Transfers F- Yes Fv- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F- Yes Fv- No -- Desalination r Yes F%O- No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes Fv- No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes Fv- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes Fv- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r- Yes Fy, No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F%o No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r" Yes 17 No -- Pollution Prevention r" Yes W No -- Salt and Salinity Management F- Yes W No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes Fv- No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship d Yes No The larger Lacey Meadows project as outlined in the Assessment (TRWC, 2013) includes development of a grazing management plan. Restoration should improve the quality of forage available. Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F- Yes Fv- No -- Water Pricing) Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Ecosystem Restoration Fv Yes F_ No The project will restore ecosystem processes by reducing erosion, promoting meadow function, and improving habitat. Forest Management F%_0 Yes F_ No The larger Lacey Meadows project as outlined in the Assessment(TRWC< 2013) includes development of a forest management strategy to reduce the risk of catastrophic fire. Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F%o- No -- Recharge Areas Protection r- Yes P No -- Water-dependent Recreation W Yes f— No Webber Lake supports a recreational fishery. Improvements to water quality in the inflow stream, Lacey Creek,will help to protect the recreational resource. Watershed Management F%o Yes F_ No Lacey Meadows Restoration projects were identified by the Lacey Meadows Assessment (TRWC, 2013), a watershed assessment and management plan. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes F%_0 No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1500000 $$- 0 1500000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $2,000 0 2000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P/ Yes i— No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 500000 0 Upper Lacey Meadows stream restoration project. Design, permitting/CEQA, and implementation. Phase 2 500000 0 Lower Lacey Meadows stream restoration project. Design, permitting/CEQA, and implementation. Phase 3 500000 0 Lacey Meadows road/drainage management. Design, permitting/CEQA, and implementation. Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The restoration project are designed to be self- will be financed for the 25-year planning sustaining. Road management requires periodic period for project implementation (not grant maintenance-approximately every 5 years. The funded). bulk of the roads are U.S. Forest Service roads and maintenance will be covered from their operations budgets. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Assessment and conceptual design. planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes V No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Meadow degradation and water quality impacts the project is not funded. (300 words or less) will continue. Implementation costs will rise as degradation becomes more severe. Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and W Yes The Lacey Meadows -- -- Evaluation r r No Assessment was completed in 2013. It N/A identified restoration and management opportunities, project actions, and relative cost. b. Final Design r Yes Final design is needed for 6/1/2015 6/1/2018 rV W No three projects (Upper Meadow, Lower N/A Meadow, and Road/Drainage Management). Work will begin as soon as funding is identified. c. Environmental Yes -- -- -- Documentation W No (CEQA/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting r Yes -- -- -- r r No N/A e. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Contracting F_ r No N/A Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. Construction Yes -- -- -- Implementation � No N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is Project design and implementation can begin as soon as funds are checked as current status obtained. Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Lacey Meadows Assessment (TRWC, project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General 2013). Coordinated Watershed Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Management Strategy, updated Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) project list (TRWC, 2014). Sierra Nevada Meadows Business Plan (NFWF, 2010). b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Lacey Meadows Assessment (TRWC, feasibility of this project 2013) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The projects were identified through research has been conducted) of the proposed project in a scientifically based watershed 300 words or less. assessment (TRWC, 2013),which included stream surveys, vegetation surveys, and historic aerial analysis. Additional studies will be needed to determine final project design - detailed site surveys, hydraulic modeling, and aquatic surveys. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes F- No WO N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No rv- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes No Po N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes r No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No F,7 N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No W7 N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Beth Christman Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568,Truckee CA 96162 E-mail bchristman@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 Other Cooperating Truckee Donner Land Trust, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Forest Service,Truckee Tahoe Airport District Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Martis Watershed Restoration Plan Implementation Project Category R Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The Martis Watershed Assessment (TRWC, 2012) was undertaken to (Briefly describe the project, in develop a comprehensive restoration plan for the Martis Creek 300 words or less) watershed.The Martis Watershed Restoration Plan was included in the Assessment. Land ownership in Martis is complicated, and prior to completion of the assessment, natural resource management was uncoordinated and inefficient. By conducting the assessment,TRWC brought together diverse stakeholders for meaningful restoration. One large project is underway, however approximately 20 restoration opportunities were identified. This project template describes the benefits that would be achieved through completing the entire Restoration Plan. The work can be phased in numerous ways. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 6 of 7, restoration project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes- Restoration projects identified by the Martis Watershed a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Assessment,TRWC 2012. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related Stakeholder Steering Committee; project partner agreements MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.31889 Longitude: -120.10080 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description Project sites are located through Martis Valley and associated (e.g., along the south bank of uplands. The Martis watershed is tributary to the Truckee River and stream/river between river contains four major branches- Main, West, Middle, and East Martis miles or miles from Creeks. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The project helps meet TMDL Annual sediment standards in accordance with the r Yes standards by reducing load reduction attainment date, and participate in r N/A sediment loading to the through full the development of future TMDLs. Truckee River.The Truckee implementation River is 303(d) listed for could be 300 excess sediment and a TMDL tons/year-the has been adopted (LRWQCB, non-urban load 2008). allocation defined for Martis Creek in the Truckee River TMDL. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Many of the projects Annual sediment implementing measures such as r Yes identified by the Restoration load reduction stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A Plan would decrease erosion through full control/restoration to meet Water through restoration. The implementation Quality Objectives (WQOs)for Truckee River is 303(d) listed could be 300 receiving water bodies established in for excess sediment. The tons/year the Basin Plan within the planning projects will help meet the horizon. WQO for turbidity in the Truckee River HU. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Restoration actions have 50 acres of wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes been identified in all major wetlands/meado to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A branches of Martis Creek. ws restoredThree processes. Riparian, wetland, and miles of incised upland habitat would all stream reaches benefit. Incised reaches will treated3 acres of be restored to improve logging landings overbank flow and decompacted infiltration. Numerous compacted logging landings will be restored to increase infiltration in upland areas. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- ly Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. rv- N/A Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater A large aquifer that provides Protect six protection activities for high quality r Yes municipal water supply lies groundwater groundwater, and advocate for r N/A below Martis Valley. During recharge zones improvements to impacted the watershed assessment, groundwater quality through public critical recharge zones were education. identified. The Restoration Plan includes protection of these important areas. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Watershed function, wildlife 50 acres of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes habitat, and instream habitat wetlands/meado associated uplands to support healthy r N/A will be restored through ws restoredThree watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife implementation of the Martis miles of incised and plant habitats. Restoration Plan. stream reaches treated3 acres of logging landings decompacted ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- caused by existing and new r Yes development. Fv N/A Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The Restoration Plan was Continue multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes developed in collaboration coordination Region for information exchange. r N/A between the major among a landowners and stakeholders minimum of four in the Martis watershed. This major collaboration will continue landowners through implementation. IWM3 - Increase public education and We will increase education Two community awareness of watershed functions, r Yes and awareness through presentationsSix protection and restoration needs to r N/A community presentations, site tours with 10 encourage stewardship by the public. site tours, and community participantsFour work days completed on years of Truckee annual Truckee River Days-a River Day community work day projects featuring 50 participants annually IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes F%0 N/A IWMS -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A More resilient watersheds will be climate change3. better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. Restoring meadows and compacted upland areas in the Martis watershed would provide enormous benefit through better flood flow attenuation as precipitation shifts from snow to rain. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A The project will increase vegetative emissions (e.g.green technology). cover. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes No -- Urban Water Use EfficiencyI Yes No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local r Yes Fv- No -- System Reoperation r Yes Wo No -- Water Transfers F- Yes Fv- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F- Yes Fv- No -- Desalination r Yes F%O- No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes Fv- No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes Fv- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes Fv- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r- Yes Fy, No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F%o No -- Matching Water Quality to Use Yes Fv- No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes F- No The Truckee River is listed as impaired for excess sediment. The project will reduce the sediment load to the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management Yes -d No -- Urban Runoff Management r" Yes r No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes d No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes d No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration id' Yes r No The project will result in ecosystem processes through restoring wetlands, stream channels, meadows, and upland areas. Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Forest Management r- Yes Fv- No -- Land Use Planning and Management r" Yes F,/- No -- Recharge Areas Protection FV_ Yes r No The project will help to protect important groundwater recharge areas in the Martis watershed. Water-dependent Recreation "' Yes FV_ No -- Watershed Management r Yes F_ No The Martis Watershed Assessment resulted in a Restoration Plan for effective watershed management. We are proposing to implement the Restoration Plan. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes W No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 750000 $$250,000 0 1000000 OR r DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P- Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 200000 0 $200,000 would be the minimum amount of funding needed to accomplish effective restoration. There are numerous ways to phase completion of the Martis Watershed Restoration plan. Each of the twenty projects could be implemented separately, or projects could be batched for greater efficiency. Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Funding agencies $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. that would support restoration in Martis include: Martis Fund, Truckee River Fund, Partner contributions, National Forest Foundation,Wildlife Conservation Board. we have not applied to any of these Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM sources for work described in this project template. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The restoration work is designed to be self- will be financed for the 25-year planning sustaining,therefore there should not be any period for project implementation (not grant additional maintenance costs. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Concept design. planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes N-1 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Degradation will continue in the Martis watershed the project is not funded. (300 words or less) resulting in water quality impacts,wetland and meadow loss,and increased upland runoff. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and W Yes The Martis Watershed -- -- Evaluation F No Assessment, including the Restoration Plan was N/A completed in 2012. b. Final Design Yes Final design is needed on 6/1/2015 12/1/2020 ry No the remaining suite of projects to be N/A implemented. c. Environmental !" Yes -- -- -- Documentation �— r No (CECI.A/NEPA) r- N/A d. Permitting r Yes -- -- -- r P No N/A Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. Construction Yes -- -- -- Contracting �— No N/A f. Construction Yes -- -- -- Implementation i— No N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is Two projects from the Restoration Plan have completed designs- checked as current status Middle Martis Wetlands Restoration and Elizabethtown Meadows. Middle Martis will be implemented in 2014 and 2015. Elizabethtown will be implemented in 2015. This project template describes Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Martis Watershed Assessment project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General (TRWC, 2012). Coordinated Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Watershed Management Strategy, Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) updated project list (TRWC, 2014). Sierra Nevada Meadows Business Plan (NFWF, 2010). b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Martis Watershed Assessment feasibility of this project (TRWC, 2012). c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The projects were identified and research has been conducted) of the proposed project in design concepts proposed in the 300 words or less. Restoration Plan contained in the Martis Watershed Assessment (TRWC, 2012). Detailed design and analysis will take place in the next phase. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No IW N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No r%_0 N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes No PO N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No %0 N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No %0 N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the Yes No %0 N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Jeannette Halderman Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568,Truckee, CA 96162 E-mail jhalderman@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 ext. 6 Other Cooperating Placer Nevada Weed Management Area,Town of Truckee, Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders USFS, Northstar, CallPC Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Non-native Invasive Plant Species Project Category R Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The project will assist in continuing to meet the goals of the (Briefly describe the project, in Coordinated Watershed Management Strategy by maintaining the 300 words or less) collaboration between Placer-Nevada WMA, USFS and the TRWC Weed Warrior program, in addition to treating non-native invasive plant species within approximately 200 acres of native habitat, over a three year period. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 4 of 7, restoration project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Truckee River TMDL, Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River Watershed a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Coordinated Watershed Management Strategy EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related MOU - Placer-Nevada WMA MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.33999 Longitude: -120.12900 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description The majority of targeted non-native invasive plant species(Noxious (e.g., along the south bank of List A, B and some C species) occur along the Truckee River Corridor, stream/river between river around Boca and Stampede Reservoirs, and in various open space and miles or miles from residential areas within the Town of Truckee, and within the Truckee Towns/intersection and/or River watershed. address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- -- standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Restore native habitats by 200 acres over bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes treating competing non- three years associated uplands to support healthy r N/A native invasive plant species, watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife promoting re-establishment and plant habitats. of native species. Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement Through the Weed Warrior 200 acres over programs to prevent the spread of r Yes program, continue to work three years existing invasive species and r N/A with the community, colonization of potential future property owners and land invasive species. managers to educate, report and treat non-native invasive plant species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Coordinate and collaborate 150 acres over public and private landowners, r Yes with public and private three years activities to manage forest health and r N/A landowners to obtain funding wildfire risks. and treat non-native invasive plant species. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F%0 Yes Work with landowners and 150 acres over caused by existing and new land managers to incorporate three year development. r N/A preventative measures into construction documents and maintenance guidelines. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among TRWC will work with public 150 acres over multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes and private landowners and three years Region for information exchange. r N/A land managers to educate and treat non-native invasive plant species. IWM3 - Increase public education and Conduct workshops,weed 50 acres over awareness of watershed functions, r Yes walks, and work days for the three years protection and restoration needs to F N/A community. encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes Fv N/A Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Improve habitat quality by 200 acres over water quality,water supply, r Yes removing non-native invasive three years groundwater recharge,flood r N/A plant species. management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A The project will improve bank climate change3. stabilization by encouraging establishment of native plant species and increasing habitat resilience to climate change. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A The project will increase native emissions (e.g.green technology). vegetative cover. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A The project will benefit wildlife habitat not already mentioned elsewhere. and recreational use. Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency Yes r,/- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes W No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local r Yes Fv- No -- System Reoperation Yes Fv- No -- Water Transfers !"' Yes F%-o No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes Fv- No -- Desalination r Yes Fv- No -- Precipitation Enhancement Yes F%O- No -- Recycled Municipal Water Yes F%O- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes Fv- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F- Yes PO No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F- Yes F%o- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F%o- No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes Fv- No -- Salt and Salinity Management Yes F%o- No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes F%-O No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes i,/ No -- Economic Incentives(Loans, Grants,and r Yes r No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes r No -- Forest Management kd Yes No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes [_ No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes rv- No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes No -- Watershed Management P Yes No Will improve wildlife habitat. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 150000 $$60,000 0 210000 OR F_ DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F,/ Yes F_ No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 50000 0 Year 1 Phase 2 50000 0 Year 2 Phase 3 50000 0 Year 3 Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Martis Fund $30,000 cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding NFF Treasured $30,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Landscapes e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Project partners, landowners, and stakeholders will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Past contracts and collaboration with partners planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Continued increase in non-native invasive plant the project is not funded. (300 words or less) species, increase erosion along streams and the Truckee River, decrease in recreational value and wildlife habitat. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes Continue to evaluate and 3/1/2014 10/1/2017 Evaluation r W No prioritize infested areas using field truthing, N/A TRWC and CalWeeclMapper reporting systems. b. Final Design r` Yes Develop schedules and 3/1/2014 4/1/2017 r10- W No specifications for contracted work. N/A c. Environmental r Yes NEPA may be required on 9/1/2014 12/1/2016 Documentation No Federal Lands. WO r (CECI.A/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting r Yes -- -- -- r Po No N/A e. Construction r Yes Bid contracted work; 6/1/2014 10/1/2017 Contracting r Wo No award bid; contract. N/A f. Construction r Yes -- 6/1/2015 10/1/2017 Implementation r ry No N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River TMDL, Lahontan Basin project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plan, Truckee River Watershed Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Coordinated Watershed Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Management Strategy b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The affects of non-native invasive research has been conducted) of the proposed project in plant species on our native habitats, 300 words or less. wildlife, and water quality has been well documented for decades. The California Department of Food and Agriculture developed a Noxious Weed List and rating system and mandates the treatment of these species in the State of California. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes F,/_ No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Where feasible,we use onsite and natural materials including logs, boulders,willow cuttings/poles/stakes, live willow/brush mattresses, etc. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No V N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes No v N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements I— Yes I— No F,/_ N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", Yes F_ No P/ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No N/A 12/31/12)? Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior r Yes r No rv- N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No W N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r" Yes r No W N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Lisa Wallace Name of Secondary Contact Erin Casey Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568 Truckee, CA 96162 E-mail ecasey@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 Other Cooperating Town of Truckee,Tahoe Resource Conservation District, Placer Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders County, Nevada County, Sierra Green Building Association, Contractors Association of Truckee-Tahoe (CATT). Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Truckee River Residential Voluntary BMP Implementation Project Category Restoration s Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description This project implement snon-point source pollution control projects, (Briefly describe the project, in i.e. BMPs, on residential properties in the middle Truckee River 300 words or less) watershed in targeted sub watersheds identified by the TMDL as containing "controllable" levels of non-point source pollution.The overall goal of the program is to improve water quality and support implementation of the TMDL by assisting residential property owners in voluntarily reducing or preventing soil erosion in more established neighborhoods in the Middle Truckee River watershed.This project is an extension of the Truckee River Watershed Council's successful program, River Friendly Landscaping, which has already produced over 400 residential site evaluations in three years. This project facilitates a community and watershed scale approach to implementing strategies outlined in the Middle Truckee River TMDL to reduce sediment loads through the implementation of residential BMPs. Project staff will a total of 450 site evaluations over 2 years. TRWC will then work with homeowners to implement one third of completed site plans with an average of 5 BMPs per plan.This project will benefit water quality by directly reducing sediment loads in the Middle Truckee River, reducing the contribution to the TMDL. BMPs are a proven method to manage runoff and erosion from residential properties. By implementing BMP measures in prioritized residential neighborhoods, we will significantly reduce the sediment load into the Middle Truckee River. The Tahoe Basin Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) has created a set of technical guides for stormwater infiltration BMPs for the Tahoe Basin. The Truckee River Watershed Council will use these guidelines to develop site plans for Tahoe Sierra IRWM homeowners to control non-point source pollution, control erosion, and infiltrate stormwater.The Tahoe Basin NRCS BMPs are tailored to the region and are suited for the Middle Truckee River watershed. As stated in the TMDL,for the Middle Truckee River,the minimum efficiency of sediment traps, mulches and vegetative stabilization is 50%;the minimum is 99%.A typical list of BMPs utilized in the design plans will include armoring drip lines, stabilizing slopes, securing bare soil and retrofitting driveways to capture, convey and infiltrate runoff. The TRWC will work directly with homeowners to develop implementation plans. Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 2, in stormwater project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Truckee River TMDL, Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River Watershed a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Coordinated Watershed Management Strategy EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related This program has an active TAC. MOUs,agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.34222 Longitude: -120.20360 Project Location Description Various locations: homeowner parcels within the Middle Truckee (e.g., along the south bank of River Watershed. stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The goal of this program is to Tons of sediment standards in accordance with the r- Yes improve water quality and reduced attainment date, and participate in F_ NSA support implementation of the development of future TMDLs. the TMDL by assisting residential property owners in reducing or preventing soil Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) erosion. WQ2-Reduce pollutant loads by The project will implement #of BMPs implementing measures such as F- Yes non-point source pollution installed stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ N/A control projects (BMPs) on control/restoration to meet Water residential properties within Quality Objectives (WQOs)for the Middle Truckee River receiving water bodies established in watershed. the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F- N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water The goal of this program is to Monitoring water supplied by public water systems R Yes improve water quality quality including continues to meet Federal and State F_ N/A physical, chemical standards. and biological monitoring of surface water WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F- N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year 1J Yes planning horizon. F,'_ N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably Yes supply water. Fv_ N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices F_ Yes to meet state goals. Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) F- N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. F N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for improvements to impacted N/A groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement Program staff identify #of invasive programs to prevent the spread of r Yes invasive weeds when infestations existing invasive species and F N/A conducting site evaluations reported colonization of potential future and submit information to invasive species. TRWC and Nevada and Placer counties. Staff provide information on invasive weeds to all homeowners including methods of eradicating populations. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F— Yes activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. N/A ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes This project reduces #of BMPs caused by existing and new sediment loads from installed Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) development. F N/A impermeable surfaces created by existing development. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future r N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Placer County, Nevada -- multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes County,Town of Truckee Region for information exchange. F N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and Program staff provide #of Yard and awareness of watershed functions, r- Yes educational resources to Garden Guides protection and restoration needs to F N/A homeowners on topics such given, #of encourage stewardship by the public. as soil erosion control, presentations landscaping, defensible space given and invasive weeds. Public presentations on the program and how it impacts watershed help are also given. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes F N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The overall goal of this -- water quality,water supply, F Yes program is to improve water groundwater recharge,flood F N/A quality by reducing sediment management) in local and regional loads per the TMDL. planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with F- N/A regional planning. Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. Fv- N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F- N/A More resilient watersheds will be climate change3. better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. Homeowner erosion control would provide enormous benefit through more effective erosion control as precipitation shifts from snow to rain. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F N/A The site plan implementations emissions(e.g.green technology). increase vegetative cover. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F N/A Some implementations increase water not already mentioned elsewhere. conservation through drought tolerant plantings 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes F- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F Yes No -- System Reoperation r Yes P No -- Water Transfers r Yes P No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater I Yes IR No -- Desalination r' Yes No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes P No -- Recycled Municipal Water r- Yes P No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes F No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F- Yes r No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F_ Yes F No -- Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F_ No The project goal is to improve water quality in the Truckee River by addressing sediment loading from residential structures. Pollution Prevention Fv Yes F' No The project addresses non-point source pollution by implementing control projects or BMPs on residential parcels. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes r No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes r- BMPs are recommended and installed to manage urban runoff from residential properties. Practice Resources Stewardship '1W Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes F- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F_ Yes No -- Forest Management F_ Yes F No -- Land Use Planning and Management Fv- Yes F_ No Land uses specific to existing development are central to the program. Recharge Areas Protection F_ Yes F No -- Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water-dependent Recreation r Yes Fv- No -- Watershed Management r Yes f No This program addresses urban uses within the watershed and addresses impacts of that development to the watershed. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes F No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 350000 $$157,500 0 507500 OR F DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 175000 0 2015 Phase 2 175000 0 2016 Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project CWA 319(h) $175,000 cost Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be financed will be financed for the 25-year planning by homeowners who have installed BMPs. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, 5 years experience running the program planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes P No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Sediment source reduction from residential the project is not funded. (300 words or less) proprerties will cease 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and (✓ Yes -- -- -- Evaluation r r No r N/A b. Final Design Yes -- -- -- r r No N/A c. Environmental Yes -- -- -- Documentation �— (CEQA/NEPA) No r N/A d. Permitting R_ Yes -- -- -- r r No r N/A Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Contracting r r No C N/A f. Construction f Yes Homeowners are 1/1/2015 12/1/2016 Implementation R- No recruited, site evaluations completed, N/A site plans implemented Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River TMDL project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Truckee River TMDL, NRCS technical feasibility of this project stormwater infiltration BMP guides, Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE). c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much USLE,Truckee River TMDL, NRCS research has been conducted)of the proposed project in technical guides. 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. r Yes F No F- N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Green materials are recommended for use in BMP design. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F- Yes F- No P N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes F- No P N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements i Yes i No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No Fv- N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F- N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Beth Christman Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568,Truckee CA 96162 E-mail bchristman@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 Other Cooperating Town of Truckee, Placer County Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title TMDL Monitoring for the Truckee River Project Category F Restoration v, Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Conduct water quality monitoring in support of the Truckee River (Briefly describe the project, in Sediment TMDL. Monitoring consists of sediment and turbidity 300 words or less) monitoring on three tributaries to the Truckee River and coordination with stations on the mainstem of the Truckee River.The program is essential for tracking progress against the Truckee River Sediment TMDL. Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 of 2, stormwater project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes. This project supports monitoring for the Truckee River TMDL. a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Limited monitoring is taking place to determine TMDL attainment. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related A TAC is in place which includes representatives from Lahontan MOUs, agreements or TACs Regional Water Quality Control Board, U.S. Geologic Survey,Town of currently in place. Truckee, Placer County, and Department of Water Resources. Project Location: Latitude: 39.32778 Longitude: -120.17830 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description The current program consists of monitoring stations on Trout Creek, (e.g., along the south bank of Cold Creek, and Donner Creek.All are tributaries to the Truckee River stream/river between river located within the Town of Truckee. Our program is coordinated with miles or miles from the Town of Truckee's program that includes stations on the Truckee Towns/intersection and/or River upstream and downstream of the Town. address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The goal of the project is to Measuring standards in accordance with the r Yes monitor progress towards sediment attainment date, and participate in r N/A attainment of the Truckee contribution to the development of future TMDLs. River sediment TMDL. the Truckee River from three key tributaries WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality The project implements a Coordination with monitoring programs through r Yes water quality monitoring Truckee River planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A program that is coordinated Water Quality annually throughout the Region. amongst other stakeholders Monitoring in the region. Program (Town of Truckee and Placer County). WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State I% N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year ly Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. F%' N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. FV N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The monitoring program Continue multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes represents a collaboration collaboration Region for information exchange. r N/A between TRWC,Town of with partners Truckee, and Placer County to help track sediment reduction in the watershed. IWM3 - Increase public education and Presentations on water continue awareness of watershed functions, r Yes quality to public; integrate collaboration protection and restoration needs to r N/A TMDL monitoring with with Adopt a encourage stewardship by the public. volunteer-based water Stream, Snapshot quality monitoring Adopt A Day, publish Stream and Snapshot Day presentations Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes Fv N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. I, N/A -- c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A -- Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A More resilient watersheds will be climate change3. better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. Identifying effective stormwater management and erosion control actions will provide enormous benefit through more effective erosion control as precipitation shifts from snow to rain. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Monitoring is expensive. This project not already mentioned elsewhere. creates economic efficiencies by measuring the specific TMDL requirement 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes P No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F Yes F%O- No -- System Reoperation Yes F%o- No -- Water Transfers r Yes F%-O No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F- Yes F%-0 No -- Desalination r Yes F%-O No -- Precipitation Enhancement F- Yes Fv- No -- Recycled Municipal Water F- Yes Fv- No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r" Yes FV_ No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r" Yes P0 No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes Fv- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes FV_ No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes F No The project tracks sediment contribution from key watersheds. Understanding the relative load is important for developing prevention plans. Salt and Salinity Management r" Yes FV_ No -- Urban Runoff Management W Yes r- No The project focuses on urban watersheds. Understanding the total load is key to developing a management plan. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r" Yes F%o- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes F%o- No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F%-o No -- Forest Management r Yes FV_ No -- Land Use Planning and Management r" Yes Fv- No -- Recharge Areas Protection r" Yes F%-o No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes FV_ No -- Watershed Management IVY, Yes F No The project supports the Truckee River TMDL-a watershed management plan. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes F%-o No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 150000 $$- 0 150000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F,/ Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 50000 0 Year 1 Monitoring Phase 2 50000 0 Year 2 Monitoring Phase 3 50000 0 Year 3 Monitoring Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Match will be $- cost difficult to obtain for this project d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Because this is a monitoring project,there are no will be financed for the 25-year planning operations and managements costs. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Existing costs of program. planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes r No h.Please describe what impact there may be if There is no comprehensive monitoring plan to the project is not funded. (300 words or less) track the attainment of the Truckee River TMDL. Our monitoring program is essential to understanding if implementation measures are having any impact. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes -- -- -- Evaluation r r No r N/A b. Final Design r Yes -- -- -- 1� r No r N/A c. Environmental r Yes -- -- -- Documentation r r No (CEQA/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting r Yes -- -- -- r r No r` N/A e. Construction W Yes -- -- -- Contracting r r No r N/A f. Construction r` Yes Our monitoring program 1/1/2015 12/1/2017 Implementation P/ FV_ No consists data collection, analysis, and reporting. r` N/A we operate three sediment monitoring stations,two of which are outfitted with near continuous turbidity sensors. This is an ongoing implementation project. We are currently in implementation and require funding to continue the program. Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River Sediment TMDL, Staff project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Report. LRWQCB 2008. Monitoring Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Plan -Section 10.4. Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Middle Truckee River TMDL feasibility of this project Suspended Sediment Monitoring Report, Water Year 2011, pages 10- 15 (and references incorporated therein).TRWC, 2012. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The scientific basis for the project is research has been conducted) of the proposed project in laid out in the Monitoring report 300 words or less. referenced above. The program has been vetted by a Technical Advisory Committee, and has provided quality data since Water Year 2011. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes F- No F,/- N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No F%O- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? i— Yes i— No F%O- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements i— Yes F- No FV- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F- Yes F- No FV- N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No FV_ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No PO_ N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the r Yes F No Fv- N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r Yes F No F,/ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Jeannette Halderman Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568,Truckee, CA 96162 E-mail jhalderman@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 ext. 6 Other Cooperating Town of Truckee,TDPUD,Truckee Tahoe Airport District, Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Truckee Sanitation District,Truckee Donner Land Trust, Private Developer,Truckee Donner Recreation and Park District Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Truckee Wetlands Restoration Project Category P Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description By restoring and partially reconnecting approximately 16 acres of (Briefly describe the project, in fragmented wetlands, the project will improve habitat connectivity 300 words or less) and diversity; increase peak flow attenuation; and significantly improve wetland functioning; expand meadow and native habitats; and create educational and recreational opportunities. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 of 7, restoration project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Truckee River Corridoor Access Plan, Truckee River TMDL, Lahontan a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Basin Plan,Truckee River Watershed Coordinated Watershed EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so Management Strategy provide description. Political Support—List related MOU -Truckee Wetlands Restoration Partnership MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.32458 Longitude: -120.16620 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description The project is located in the Town of Truckee, starting in thegeneral (e.g., along the south bank of area of Cottonwood Restaurant/Hilltop Master Plan on Old Brockway stream/river between river Road and moving east and north toward the Truckee Regional Park, miles or miles from Ponderosa Golf Course,the MartisValley Estates neighborhood, Towns/intersection and/or continuing through the area of the Town of Truckee Corpo ratio nYard, address): terminating in the main stem of the Truckee River. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- -- standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project will reduce Approximately 16 implementing measures such as r Yes sedimentation created by acres stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A erosion, improve water control/restoration to meet Water quality by reducing pollutants Quality Objectives (WQOs)for through increased receiving water bodies established in attenuation in meadow the Basin Plan within the planning system. horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Increased attenuation in 16 acres of wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes meadow system meadow/riparian to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A habitat processes. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. Fv N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Increase attenuation in 16 acres protection activities for high quality r Yes meadow system; provide meadow/riparian groundwater, and advocate for F N/A educational signage, trails, habitat improvements to impacted and community work days. groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for Irrigation usage of pond to -- multiple uses (e.g. FV Yes water Ponderosa golf course municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A has been evaluated and supply and environmental use). considered during planning of this project. ER1 - Enhance and restore water Restore hydrology and 16 acres of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes function of 16 acres of meadow/riparian associated uplands to support healthy r N/A meadow/riparian habitat. habitat. watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife Restore eroding uplands by and plant habitats. redirecting runoff into natural channels and flood plains. Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement Prevention of spreading, and 16 acres of programs to prevent the spread of r Yes treatment of non-native meadow/riparian existing invasive species and r N/A invasive plant species will be habitat colonization of potential future incorporated into the invasive species. restoration/construction plan. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes Existing irrigation pond will -- caused by existing and new be reconfigured to increase development. F N/A meadow habitat around the edges; check dams will be installed in eroding channels to capture sedimentation and slow flows. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among TRWC will work with all 16 acres multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes partners and other adjacent Region for information exchange. r N/A property owners. IWM3 - Increase public education and Educational signs, involve 16 acres awareness of watershed functions, r Yes public on community work protection and restoration needs to r N/A days. encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes F%' N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Improve water quality and 16 acres water quality,water supply, r Yes habitat quality. groundwater recharge,flood management) in local and regional Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) planning efforts and support efforts r N/A to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A he project will improve bank climate change3. stabilization and habitat resilience to impacts from climate change such as increased precipitation and flows. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A The project will increase vegetative emissions(e.g.green technology). cover. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A The project will benefit wildlife habitat not already mentioned elsewhere. and recreational use. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes F%-o No -- System Reoperation F- Yes F%-O No -- Water Transfers i— Yes No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater ;-- Yes No -- Desalination F Yes Fv- No -- Precipitation Enhancement 1-` Yes 1v No -- Recycled Municipal Water 1-` Yes 1v No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes r%O- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes r No Will improve water quality downstream. Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r" Yes r No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes 1-" No Will support Beneficial Uses of the Truckee River per the Lahontan Basin Plan Pollution Prevention 1v Yes 1— No attainment of Truckee River TMDL Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F%o- No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes F%O No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes Fv- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes F%O- No -- Water Pricing) Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Ecosystem Restoration W Yes F No -- Forest Management r- Yes F,/_ No -- Land Use Planning and Management r" Yes FV_ No -- Recharge Areas Protection r- Yes Fy-, No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes F%-o No -- Watershed Management V Yes r No Will improve wildlife habitat and water quality. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r- Yes FV_ No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage-CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1250000 $$- 0 1250000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 250000 0 Planning& Design Phase 2 700000 0 Implementation Phase 1- TDLT Property to TTAD Phase 3 200000 0 Implement Phase 2- Truckee Pines Detension Basin to Corp Yard Phase 4 100000 0 Implement Phase 3- Truckee River Flood Plain Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs all land owners are project partners and have will be financed for the 25-year planning agreed to maintain the project period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Continued erosion and increased sedimentation the project is not funded. (300 words or less) into the Truckee River; loss of native habitat through continued drying conditions. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes Resource studies and 3/1/2014 12/1/2014 Evaluation F%O- W No wetland delineation still need be be completed. F_ N/A b. Final Design F_ Yes Develop construction 2/1/2015 4/1/2015 F%O- W_ No documents. F_ N/A c. Environmental r Yes -- 9/1/2014 12/1/2014 Documentation W No (CEQA/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting r Yes LRQCB, CDFW, USFWS, 3/1/2014 2/1/2015 r W No Corps N/A e. Construction Yes Construction documents 4/1/2015 6/1/2015 Contracting Wo No to bid; award contract. r- N/A f. Construction r Yes -- 7/1/2015 10/1/2017 Implementation W/ No r N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is Assessment& Evaluation:Two assessments have been conducted to checked as current status date: feasibility and soils/hydrology, and preparation of conceptual design. Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River TMDL, Lahontan Basin project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plan, Truckee River Watershed Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Coordinated Watershed Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Management Strategy b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 1) Preliminary Assessment of feasibility of this project Restoration Options for the Hilltop- Ponderosa Wetlandcomplex2) Truckee Wetlands Restoration Partnership Conceptual Report Design Basis Report c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The Preliminary Assessment research has been conducted) of the proposed project in addressed property constrains, geo- 300 words or less. technical and wetland delineation reports available, and soil reports to determine approximate limits of historical wetlands. Additional soils and hydrology data and water useage was collected from the project site during 2012-2013 d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Where feasible,we will use onsite an natural materials including logs, boulders,willow cuttings/poles/stakes, live willow/brush mattresses, etc. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No F,/- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes F- No Fv N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes - No N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F- Yes F- No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No FV_ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F%O_ N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No FV_ N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No F%O_ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Donielle Morse Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Dr., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating North Tahoe Public Utility District,Tahoe City Public Utility Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders District and any other agencies within the TSIRWMP region that would like to participate in the program. Will also partner with Tahoe Resource Conservation District on their landscape conservation program. Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Regional Water Conservation Programs Project Category r Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Regional water conservation program for STPUD, NTPUD, and TCPUD (Briefly describe the project, in that includes implementing water conservation measures such as turf 300 words or less) removal; water saving appliance installation (commercial and residential); interior and exterior water audits for efficiency measures; and providing outreach and educational materials. Total number of projects 5 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes, this project contributes to the AB1420 and the SBX7-7 (20 a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, percent water reduction by 2020) as mandated by the State of EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so California. provide description. Political Support—List related MOU with CUWCC MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description The water conservation implementation measures are located in the (e.g., along the south bank of water service areas of the TSIRWM region, which encompasses stream/river between river portions of Alpine County, El Dorado County, Placer County, and miles or miles from Sierra County. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL standards in accordance with the r- Yes addresses urban runoff from attainment date, and participate in F_ N/A irrigation and the use of the development of future TMDLs. fertilizers on urban landscaping. This project will reduce both of these pollutants by reducing the amount of irrigation water and fertilizers used on private and commercial landscape sites. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project promotes the 126,000 square implementing measures such as F Yes removal of turf as foot of turf stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F N/A landscaping and promotes removal is control/restoration to meet Water native landscaping that not projected Quality Objectives (WQOs)for only utilizes less irrigation depending upon receiving water bodies established in water but does not need funding. This the Basin Plan within the planning fertilizer use, minimizing the results in a horizon. pollutant loads to Lake savings of.15 Tahoe. gallons per sq ft of turf removed per day times 150 days per year (based on the local are irrigation season) is equal to 22 Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) gallons per sq. ft. per year or a total water savings of 2,772,000 gallons saved annually. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F- N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems F_ Yes continues to meet Federal and State F- N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering F- N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet This project reduces the Estimated 4.8 MG projected demands for a 20-year F Yes demand on water supply, annually will be planning horizon. r N/A thereby protecting the water saved with this resources for future use. project by implementing all proposed Best management practices for water conservation. WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably Yes supply water. F N/A Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM WS3 - Implement and promote water This project implements the With the turf conservation measures and practices r- Yes California Urban Water buyback BMP to meet state goals. F- N/A Conservation Council's implementation (CUWCC) Best Management alone, estimated Practices designed to meet water savings are state water savings goals 2.7 MG of water saved annually. Additional water conservation B M P's implemented would increase this annual savings by 2,055,812 MG. GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- r Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for The majority of the municipal -- multiple uses (e.g. Yes water supply source in Lake municipal/industrial/agricultural F N/A Tahoe is groundwater; supply and environmental use). conservation manages this source for multiple uses ER1 - Enhance and restore water The turf removal -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes implementation for this associated uplands to support healthy F N/A project contributes to the watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife enhancement and and plant habitats. restoration of Lake Tahoe and its tributaries by keeping urban runoff and fertilizer from entering the watersheds ER2 - Develop and implement -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM colonization of potential future F- N/A invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F- Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes The implementation of 126,000 square caused by existing and new landscaping best feet of turf is development. F N/A management practices in the proposed to be Water Conservation program removed. helps to minimize impacts of new and existing developments by encouraging waterwise landscaping resulting in a reduction in irrigation runoff and fertilizer use. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future r N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This program is a regional -- multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes program and utilizes Region for information exchange. F N/A collaboration and information among implementing water agencies IWM3 - Increase public education and This program contains an -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes educational/outreach protection and restoration needs to F N/A component designed to encourage stewardship by the public. make the public aware of urban landscaping and its effect on the watershed. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes F N/A Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water conservation With all proposed water quality,water supply, r Yes contributes to maintaining an water groundwater recharge,flood F N/A adequate supply of stored conservation management) in local and regional water resources to meet BMP's planning efforts and support efforts anticipated impacts of implemented, to continue improving the science. climate change on water 19,069 kWh of sources. In addition, water electricity saved conservation results in a per year; 13.5 reduction of greenhouse Metric Tons of gases and a reduction in Carbon Dioxide energy usage by reducing the reduced annually need to treat and transport drinking water. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with F- N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F- N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F N/A South Lake Tahoe, Kings Beach and Sierra County are all designated disadvantaged communities c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. F- N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Water source storage and availability climate change3. will be affected by climate change, this program helps to increase available water supply for that eventuality e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F N/A Water production and distribution are emissions (e.g.green technology). one of the highest consumers of energy. With water conservation efforts, less water production leads to Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM a reduction in energy usage, which leads to a reduction in ghg. For this project alone, there is an estimated 19,069 kWh of annual electricity saved and a resulting 13.5 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide saved annually. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes r No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency Yes r No Water conservation programs help to increase urban water use efficiency Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local C" Yes No -- System Reoperation F- Yes No -- Water Transfers r Yes No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes No -- Desalination r Yes No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F—, No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes R- No -- Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes Po No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes f No Landscaping replacement with native plants as proposed in this program help to minimize irrigation runoff and fertilizer usage Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F_ No -- Urban Runoff Management F Yes F_ No Landscaping replacement with native plants helps to control urban runoff Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes F No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes r No The program provides economic Water Pricing) incentives to participants Ecosystem Restoration F Yes F_ No -- Forest Management r" Yes r No -- Land Use Planning and Management F—, Yes IJ No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F No -- Water-dependent Recreation F Yes 7 No -- Watershed Management F*I- Yes r No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes Fv No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 500000 $100,000 0 600000 OR F DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? .. Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 200000 0 Water conservation BMP implementation, education, outreach Phase 2 200000 0 Water conservation BMP implementation, education, outreach Phase 3 200000 0 Water conservation BMP implementation, education, outreach Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Water Utility $100,000 cost General Funds d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be provided will be financed for the 25-year planning by the landowner/homeowner period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Historical usage planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r- Yes • No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Water conservation/water use efficiency has been the project is not funded. (300 words or less) identified as an important aspect in dealing with future water supply and source needs. Without a program to implement water efficiency use by all, water sources will be impacted negatively. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r- Yes -- -- -- Evaluation f No C" N/A b. Final Design Yes -- -- -- r r No r N/A c. Environmental R Yes -- -- -- Documentation F r No (CEQA/NEPA) C" N/A d. Permitting Yes -- -- -- f No r N/A e. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Contracting 7 r- No N/A f. Construction f Yes Program implementation 1/1/2015 12/1/2018 Implementation r No including outreach, application materials, f N/A best management practices and rebates and incentives to landowners Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed California Urban Water Conservation project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Council Best Management Practices Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Implementation Memorandum of Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Understanding; California Department of Water Resources Urban Water Management Plan; Lake Tahoe TMDL and Lahontan Basin Management Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the US EPA Water Conservation feasibility of this project guidelines; The Handbook of Water Use and Conservation: Homes, Landscapes, Business, Industry, Farms; Amy Vickers May 2013 c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much A variety of research exists regarding research has been conducted) of the proposed project in Best Management Practices for 300 words or less. water conservation, but the most concise are included on the CUWCC's website: www.cuwcc.org where a breakdown for each BMP shows evaluations for calculating water savings. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements r Yes No N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No R_ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the r Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No R_ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Jessica Thompson Name of Secondary Contact Dan Wilkins Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee, CA 96161 E-mail jhompson@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2938 Other Cooperating Placer County,Truckee River Watershed Council Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Water Quality Monitoring Project Category F Restoration v, Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The proposed project will design and construct LID strategies in the (Briefly describe the project, in Truckee Downtown/Brickelltown area and along West River Street. 300 words or less) Downtown is located just north of the Truckee River and West River Street runs through Downtown, parallel to the Truckee River. These areas are high density mixed use and include many businesses and some residential and the streets are heavily sanded for safety in the winter. This area of the watershed has also been identified as a high priority area for water quality improvements in the TRWQMP. The LID strategies will include improvements to exposed dirt areas and treatment for road runoff such as vegetated swales,filter strips, rain gardens, bio-retention, grading, and adjacent parking area improvements. These improvements will be installed in conjunction with a larger project to repave and improve West River Street, although only the drainage and LID improvements will be applicable to this grant application. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 5 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes. The proposed improvements would reduce sediment loads a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, entering the Truckee River which is a sediment impaired water body. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so Reducing pollutant loads to the Truckee River is a requirement of the provide description. Phase 2 MS4 permit for Truckee and the TMDL requirements that are included in the permit. In addition to sediment, the proposed BMPS would also provide pollutant load reduction for other pollutants of concern that adheres to sediment, such as heavy metals and oil and grease. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Political Support—List related MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.27222 Longitude: -120.20595 Project Location Description Monitoring occurs on or near Truckee River,Trout Creek, Donner (e.g., along the south bank of Creek, Donner Lake, Cold Stream, Prosser Creek, Martis Creek or stream/river between river other waterways in Town as conditions change or monitoring miles or miles from indicates. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The monitoring plan was All 34 square standards in accordance with the r Yes designed and is implemented miles within the attainment date, and participate in r N/A in accordance with the Town limits are the development of future TMDLs. Middle Truckee River TMDL. within the Priority pollutants are Truckee River monitored. Watershed and therefore contribute to the TMDL and is monitored. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Monitoring helps identify Pollutant load implementing measures such as r Yes priority area that are would be stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A contributing the most load. monitored before control/restoration to meet Water This information is then used and after to Quality Objectives (WQOs)for to guide capital improvement determine the receiving water bodies established in projects and land use load reduction. the Basin Plan within the planning decisions to reduce horizon. pollutants and monitor effectiveness. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality The TRWQMP was developed 34 square miles monitoring programs through r Yes with Placer County for the within Truckee planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A Middle Truckee River region. limits monitored annually throughout the Region. The plan is coordinated annually and other monitoring efforts that are conducted within the region are taken into account and coordinated. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. FV N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F_ Yes reliability. FV N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Fv N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of Yes existing invasive species and W N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes Data from monitoring is used 34 square miles caused by existing and new to make decisions regarding of watershed development. F N/A implementation of capital improvement projects, condition new development projects, and make other land use decisions.The primary pollutant of concern is sediment,which impacts the cold water fish and endangered Lahontan Cutthroat Trout. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Data from monitoring is used 34 square miles water-related planning activities r Yes to make decisions regarding of watershed within the planning horizon as r N/A implementation of capital supported by current and future improvement projects, watershed science. condition new development projects, and make other land use decisions.The monitoring effort is coordinated with others including Placer County and the Truckee River Watershed Council. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Truckee has collaborated 34 square miles multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes with Placer County and of watershed Region for information exchange. r N/A Truckee River Watershed Council to fill in the gaps of the monitoring in the region and provide a coordinated approach. Placer County and Truckee Monitoring data is publicly available in a joint annual report and provided on the TRIG website and the State database CEDEN if the type of monitoring data is supported. IWM3 - Increase public education and Data is publicly available. -- awareness of watershed functions, r Yes Data provides information on protection and restoration needs to I_ N/A watershed health and encourage stewardship by the public. improvement. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes F%0 N/A Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Provides water quality data 34 square miles water quality,water supply, r Yes trends over time and data of watershed groundwater recharge,flood r. N/A helps direct land use management) in local and regional planning decisions. planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A The Truckee River terminates in considerations. Pyramid Lake, located within the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Reservation. Reductions in sediment loads benefits this as well as the fisheries including Lahontan Cutthroat Trout. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Data collected helps identify trends in climate change3. water quality due to rainfall, erosion, flooding or other events. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas We N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes Fv- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r" Yes F%-O No -- System Reoperation r- Yes F%-o No -- Water Transfers F- Yes l;-W No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes F%-O No -- Desalination r- Yes F%-o No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes F%-o No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes F%-o No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes F%O- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes PO No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F- Yes F%O- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F%o- No -- Pollution Prevention Fv- Yes f- No Data collected helps identify high pollutant load areas. Pollutant load reduction can then be implemented by education, capital improvement projects, or other methods of pollutant reduction. prevention/reduction. Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Salt and Salinity Management r- Yes FV_ No -- Urban Runoff Management r,/- Yes F_ No Data collected helps identify high pollutant load areas. Pollutant load reduction can then be implemented by education, capital improvement projects, or other methods of pollutant reduction Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship Yes r,/_ No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes f— No Data collected helps identify high Water Pricing) pollutant load areas. Pollutant load reduction can then be implemented by education, capital improvement projects, or other methods of pollutant reduction. prevention/reduction. Data collected helps support grant requests. Ecosystem Restoration PO Yes F_ No Data collected helps identify high pollutant load areas. Pollutant load reduction can then be implemented by education, capital improvement projects, or other methods of pollutant reduction. prevention/reduction. Forest Management Yes tv— No -- Land Use Planning and Management W Yes r- No Data collected helps identify high pollutant load areas. Pollutant load reduction can then be implemented by education, capital improvement projects, or other methods of pollutant reduction. prevention/reduction. Recharge Areas Protection Yes W No -- Water-dependent Recreation r' Yes P No -- Watershed Management r Yes F_ No Data collected helps identify high pollutant load areas. Pollutant load reduction can then be implemented by education, capital improvement projects, or other methods of pollutant reduction. prevention/reduction. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes F%o- No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 0 $available as needed 232635 625000/5 OR years 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? P/ Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 125000 0 any portion of the monitoring program can be reduced or tailored to fit the available funding. A minimum of$65,000/year is minimum amount required to implement. Phase 2 125000 0 any portion of the monitoring program can be reduced or tailored to fit the available funding Phase 3 125000 0 any portion of the monitoring program can be reduced or tailored to fit the available funding Phase 4 125000 0 any portion of the monitoring program can be reduced or tailored to fit the available funding Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Prop 84 Round 2 $232,635 cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding General Fund As Needed and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Water quality monitoring is essentially operation will be financed for the 25-year planning and maintaining the stations and will not be period for project implementation (not grant continued without funding. Stations are removed if funded). funding is not available to continue and equipment can be re-installed as funding is available at a later date. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Monitoring has been implemented since 2009. planning, bid, etc.) These are actual costs. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes W No Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM h.Please describe what impact there may be if Monitoring will not be continued past 2015 if the project is not funded. (300 words or less) additional funding is not secured 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/A Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage ctual Start al Completion Project Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Wo Yes -- -- -- Evaluation r (` No N/A b. Final Design ry Yes -- -- -- 1y r No r N/A c. Environmental r Yes -- -- -- Documentation r No (CEQA/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting W Yes -- -- -- No N/A e. Construction P Yes Water Monitoring 10/1/2015 10/1/2018 Contracting — No implementation contract is renewed r` N/A every 3 years. f. Construction r Yes Portions of the 10/1/2009 9/1/2024 Implementation 7 r No monitoring program have been implemented N/A since 2009. Grant funds allow continued operation of the monitoring program and expansion of the data. Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more The TRWQMP provided a framework for monitoring and a starting than one project stage is point. Although the TRWQMP is the 'Final Design', as monitoring checked as current status continues, monitoring locations and methods are re-evaluated and adjustments made as necessary. Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River Water Quality project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Monitoring Plan, General Plan, Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat TMDL, NPDES permit, Basin Plan Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Annual Reports 2009-2013 feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Portions of the project are currently research has been conducted) of the proposed project in being implemented, in part by Town 300 words or less. of Truckee and also in cooperation with the Truckee River Watershed Council. The monitoring has been conducted since 2009 d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No F- N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management I— Yes I— No �i N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes F- No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes No N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No d N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No P N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes r No W N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No W N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No P/ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Kim Garon Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating -- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Waterlines -Sierra Tract, Brockway, Black Bart Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Project includes replacement of approximately 3,530 linear feet of (Briefly describe the project, in water main with new 8-inch water main and associated water 300 words or less) services, water meters, fire hydrants, water main connections, site restoration including landscaping and paving replacement, and appurtenances.The project has two benefits: replacing aging, leaking water infrastructure to preserve water supplies and increasing the fire protection capabilities at the site. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 4 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes, STPUD has identified over 80,000 linear feet of waterline a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, replacement in their service area that need to be upgraded to meet EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so the new fire prevention mandates. This project will also contribute to provide description. the Lake Tahoe Fire Protection Partnership, a bi-state agency formed to increase the fire protection in the Lake Tahoe Basin by working collaboratively on identifying priority water supply projects that enhance fire protection. In addition, replacing leaking water infrastructure is a Best Management Practice as identified by the California Urban Water Conservation Council. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Political Support-List related STPUD has an MOU with the CUWCC to implement water MOUs, agreements or TACs conservation Best Management Practices, including currently in place. repairing/replacing leaking water delivery infrastructure. In addition, the waterline replacement project, as part of the larger Lake Tahoe Fire Protection Partnership, has the support of Senators Boxer and Feinstien, as well as the Fire Protection Districts and the community for it's fire protection capabilities. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description Sierra Tract, Elwood from Stockton to Sierra streets,William from (e.g., along the south bank of Reno to Carson streets, Chris from Reno to Carson streets, and Chris stream/river between river from O'Malley streets. miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- standards in accordance with the F_ Yes attainment date, and participate in N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2-Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as F_ Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F- N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F- Yes planning horizon, and coordinate Fv_ N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems F_ Yes Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) continues to meet Federal and State r- N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of Fv_ N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. � N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or The waterline replacement -- replace infrastructure to reliably Yes project will upgrade existing supply water. r N/A water system components with more efficient and reliable infrastructure. WS3 - Implement and promote water This project will conserve -- conservation measures and practices r Yes water by replacing aging to meet state goals. F_ N/A leaking waterlines. It will implement and promote water conservation measures and practices. GWM1 - Maintain and monitor F' Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F_ Yes groundwater, and advocate for N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F_ Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) supply and environmental use). r- N/A ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy Fi N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and Fi N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with South Lake Tahoe is 3530 feet of public and private landowners, F Yes considered a high risk, replacement activities to manage forest health and F N/A wildland-urban interface fire water supply pipe wildfire risks. area; for this reason, STPUD increased to 8 has a waterline replacement inch for fire program for the entire suppression delivery system for upgrades efforts; 7 fire that allow sufficient water hydrants installed pressure and supply to to provide for the protect homes and residential homes businesses during fire events. in the project In addition, much of the area. community is without fire hydrants and each waterline upgrade installs a fire hydrant on every 500 feet of waterline installed. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. F N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future r N/A watershed science. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The partnership consists of -- multiple jurisdictions within the r- Yes all the water suppliers in the Region for information exchange. F N/A basin and works together to implement a variety of infrastructure improvements projects in order to provide a contiguous fire protection around the lake. IWM3 - Increase public education and -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes Fv- N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Every water conservation Leaking water water quality,water supply, r Yes effort is a direct benefit to supply groundwater recharge,flood F N/A future climate change distribution pipes management) in local and regional effects, which call for are estimated to planning efforts and support efforts increased water storage and contribute to 10% to continue improving the science. water supply. This project is water production the replacement of leaking loss. water supply distribution pipes that will result in water savings wi IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with F- N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F- N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F- N/A Yes, South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community and the project is located in this community. c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. F N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Water source storage and availability climate change3. will be affected by climate change, this program helps to increase available water supply for that eventuality e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Water conservation efforts result in emissions (e.g.green technology). less drinking water treatment and distribution. Water and wastewater treatment are identified as among the highest of energy users in the country. Less water production and distribution results in less energy utilized, leading to a reduction in ghg. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are Fv- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes F- No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes F_ No The replacement of leaking water distribution pipes is identified as a Best Management Practice by the CUWCC.This project will implement this BMP and result in significant water savings. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local r Yes F_ No This project is the improvement of local drinking water supply conveyance infrastructure. System Reoperation F Yes No -- Water Transfers r Yes No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes F No -- Desalination F Yes W No -- Precipitation Enhancement F Yes No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r- Yes F No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes F_ No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use ru Yes F No -- Pollution Prevention ru Yes No -- Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r' Yes F No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes No -- Forest Management F Yes F_ No This project will result in improved fire fighting capacity, helping to protect the national forest within the STPUD service area. Land Use Planning and Management F Yes F' No -- Recharge Areas Protection F- Yes F No -- Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes F No -- Watershed Management r Yes No -- Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management Yes v No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1500000 $$375,000 0 1875000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $37,500 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 625000 0 Design,construction of the Sierra Blvd phase of waterline installation. Phase 2 625000 0 Design,construction of the Brockway phase of waterline installation. Phase 3 625000 0 Design,construction of the Black Bart phase of waterline installation. Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project STPUD Capitol $375,000 cost Improvement Funding Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d1ist proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M Costs are included in the STPUD general will be financed for the 25-year planning revenue budget annually. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Planning documents; historical information planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F_ Yes P No h.Please describe what impact there may be if This project provides water savings as well as fire the project is not funded. (300 words or less) protection benefits. Both of these benefits would be lost without funding for project implementation, leaving vulnerable commercial and residential areas without adequate fire protection. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and P' Yes -- -- -- Evaluation No N/A b. Final Design (v Yes -- -- -- C f No C" N/A c. Environmental Yes All waterline -- -- Documentation r No replacement projects are (CEQA/NEPA) covered under and MOU f N/A with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and are also Categorical Exempt under CEQA as maintenance on existing infrastructure. d. Permitting f Yes Permits will be identified 5/1/2015 10/1/2015 No and obtained during the Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1 F N/A construction contracting phase. e. Construction Yes Project will need to be 5/1/2015 10/1/2015 Contracting No bid and contracts executed. IJ N/A f. Construction f Yes Installation of the 3530 5/1/2015 10/1/2015 Implementation 1 r No linear feet of upgraded water lines, including f N/A installation of 7 fire hydrants. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is Projects are fully designed and environmental documentation checked as current status complete, however, permitting, contracting and implementation will all be completed upon funding allocation. Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Compliance with the National Fire project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Protection Association and the Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat California Fire Code standards; Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) California Urban Water Conservation Council's Best Management Implementation guidelines. b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much California State Fire Code has research has been conducted)of the proposed project in information on the size of water 300 words or less. supply lines necessary to provide the adequate fire flow for fire suppression;the California Urban Water Conservation Council has information on the water savings through repair of leaking water infrastructure. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F- Yes F No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management ;r Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes I No I N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements r Yes I No i N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", I Yes I No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No v N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the ;v Yes I No I N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the i Yes No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Becky Bucar Name of Secondary Contact JoAnn Anders Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee, CA 96161 E-mail bbucar@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2932 Other Cooperating Truckee River Watershed Council, Placer County, Lahontan Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Regional Water Quality Control Board Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title West River Street Site Redevelopment and River Revitalization Project Category R Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description This two-part project includes 1)the development of a the West River (Briefly describe the project, in Street Parkway park providing recreational components and 300 words or less) interpretive enhancements in Historic Downtown Truckee 2) overall revitalization of the Truckee River Corridor in Downtown Truckee.The park, located directly on the Truckee River,will include recreational components such as riverfront trail, plazas, picnic and barbeque areas, outdoor amphitheater, and shaded seating areas and will offer direct public access to the Truckee River on a site owned by the Town of Truckee.The Revitalization Project will revitalize underutilized lands, abate environmental degradation and redevelop the community's neglected waterfront consistent with the 2005 Truckee Downtown River Revitalization Strategy plan. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 9 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes, the project will include BMP retrofits that will reduce overall a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, sediment levels in Truckee River, thereby working to attain TMDL EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so goals. provide description. Political Support—List related Stormwater Citizens Advisory Committee MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.32549 Longitude: -120.18760 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description Along the south side of West River Street, East River Street ad the (e.g., along the south bank of north and south banks of the Truckee River. stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Project includes the Available standards in accordance with the r Yes implementation of BMPs and monitoring data attainment date, and participate in r N/A LIDS. Reducing pollutant along the Truckee the development of future TMDLs. loads to the Truckee River is River can be a requirement of the Phase 2 evaluated before MS4 permit for Truckee and and after the the TMDL requirements that project. are included in the permit. In addition to sediment,the proposed BMPs would also provide pollutant load reduction for other pollutants of concern, such as heavy metals and oil and grease. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The project will install BMPs Pre and post implementing measures such as r Yes and LID retrofits to improve water quality stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A water quality and help meet monitoring data, control/restoration to meet Water WQOs of the Middle Truckee square feet of LID Quality Objectives (WQOs)for River. improvements. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality -- Water quality monitoring programs through r Yes monitoring may planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A be part of the annually throughout the Region. project. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Implementation of the Square feet of LID wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes project BMPs and LID improvements to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A improvements helps improve and restored processes. the Truckee River watershed areas. by reducing sediment loads and other pollutants related to sediment. Implementation of LID improvements restores the natural filtering processes of the watershed. In addition, the project will include restoration of the riparian areas along the Truckee River. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water Project will install native Percent survival conservation measures and practices r Yes drought resistance plants rate of to meet state goals. r N/A that will not require on-going vegetation. watering. Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. F%' N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Project will install LID and Square feet of LID bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes erosion control, which will improvements. associated uplands to support healthy r N/A improve water quality of the watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife adjacent Truckee River, and plant habitats. thereby improve the ecosystems within and adjacent to the river. ER2 - Develop and implement All revegetation work will Number of programs to prevent the spread of r Yes require invasive weed invasive weeds existing invasive species and r N/A management. removed. colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes The redevelopment will Acreage of caused by existing and new replace existing degraded redeveloped development. r N/A development along the land. Truckee River with development that improves the quality of wildlife and fishery habitat in the Truckee River andits tributaries as well as maintaining and protecting the ecological function of the river. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Effectiveness and success of Pre and post water-related planning activities r Yes the projects will supported water quality within the planning horizon as r N/A by post water quality monitoring data. supported by current and future monitoring data. watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The redevelopment along the Number of multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes Truckee will require meetings. Region for information exchange. N/A collaboration between Placer County,Town of Truckee, and Truckee River Watershed Council. IWM3 - Increase public education and The park project will include Number of awareness of watershed functions, r Yes interpretive signs and attendees and protection and restoration needs to I_ N/A improved access to the participants at encourage stewardship by the public. Truckee River. Public the functions. education may include hands-on projects that schools can help with and publicly available data. IWM4- Promote activities that Implementation of the Addition pervious reduce flood risk. W Yes projects increases the natural surface created. r N/A function of the watershed through infiltration, thereby reducing peak flow and providing additional water storage. Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water quality, groundwater Square feet of water quality,water supply, r Yes recharge, and flood LID, square feet groundwater recharge,flood r N/A management are all of restored management) in local and regional improved with the project riparian areas, planning efforts and support efforts implementation and area of additional to continue improving the science. improved watershed function pervious surfaces. through the use of BMPs and LID improvements. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A The Truckee River terminates in considerations. Pyramid Lake, located within the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Reservation. Reductions in sediment loads benefits this community and the fisheries they depend on including Lahontan Cutthroat Trout. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Data collected helps identify trends in climate change3. water quality due to rainfall, erosion, flooding or other events. Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r- N/A BMP retrofits will include LID practices emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency )— Yes Fv- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F%o- Yes F- No Revegetation efforts will require drought resistant native plants. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local Yes F%o- No -- System Reoperation r Yes F%-O No -- Water Transfers r- Yes Io No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r" Yes W No -- Desalination r Yes F%-O No -- Precipitation Enhancement r" Yes P No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes F%o- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local !"' Yes F%O- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Fv- Yes i— No Surface water sources are improved by Distribution the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation )— Yes rv- No -- Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Matching Water Quality to Use Fv- Yes F_ No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Pollution Prevention FV_ Yes r No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Salt and Salinity Management FV_ Yes F_ No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Urban Runoff Management FV_ Yes F_ No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes rv- No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes r No May include incentives for Water Pricing) redevelopment. Ecosystem Restoration r Yes r No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Forest Management Yes r No -- Land Use Planning and Management W Yes r- No Water monitoring data helps make decisions on project improvement locations and types. Data collected from pre and post projects helps direct future improvements and improve upon standard designs. Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F_ No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Water-dependent Recreation FV_ Yes F_ No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Watershed Management FV_ Yes r No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F,/_ Yes F_ No BMP and LID implementation improves watershed infiltration, treatment and storage,which helps manage flood risk. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 7200000 $$2,125,000 13000000 22325000 OR F_ DAC 2. Annual Operations and $100,000 0 100000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F,/ Yes F_ No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 2325000 10000 For West River Street Parkway Development Phase 2 1000000 5000 Initial Incentive or Loan Program Phase 3 19000000 85000 All other redevelopment Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Development Impact $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Fees, General Fund, Private Developer Funding e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs General Fund through on-going operations costs for will be financed for the 25-year planning Public Works personnel period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Planning Costs. West River Street Parkway costs are planning, bid, etc.) based on itemized cost estimate.Other costs are conceptual and reflect order of magnitude costs only. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes N-1 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Truckee River will continue to flow through the project is not funded. (300 words or less) I degraded area inDowntown Truckee. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and FV_ Yes Truckee Downtown River 1/1/2005 12/1/2011 Evaluation r r No Revitalization Strategy completed in 2005. F N/A Conceptual Plan for West River Street Parkway completed in 2011. b. Final Design r Yes -- -- -- 1J r No tv— N/A c. Environmental r Yes -- -- -- Documentation r No (CECI.A/NEPA) tv— N/A d. Permitting r` Yes -- -- -- r No ry N/A e. Construction r Yes -- -- -- Contracting r r No IO N/A f. Construction Yes -- -- -- Implementation �` No ry N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Middle Truckee River TMDL, NPDES project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Phase 2 General Permit,Town of Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Truckee General Plan Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 2005 Truckee Downtown River feasibility of this project Revitalization Strategy c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Significant research exists indicating research has been conducted) of the proposed project in that BMP and LID improvements 300 words or less. treat and retain stormwater. The project is in the conceptual stages and the scientific data will be developed as the designs develop. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe LID and BMPs e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F- Yes F- No FV- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes r No r%-O N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F- Yes r No r%-O N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No :d N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No W N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes F No W N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the Yes No N/A grant submittal date? Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Becky Bucar Name of Secondary Contact Todd Landry Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee, CA 96161 E-mail bbucar@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2932 Other Cooperating Placer County,Truckee River Watershed Council, Contractors Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Association of Truckee Tahoe, other participants in Placer County Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title West River Street Project Category i' Restoration ►r Storm Water/Flood Control F Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description In 2008, the Town of Truckee together with Placer County developed (Briefly describe the project, in the Truckee River Water Quality Monitoring Plan (TRWQMP) and has 300 words or less) performed water quality monitoring at outfalls along West River Street and downtown which indicate high sediment loads are entering the Truckee River during rain events, likely due to accumulated abrasives that have been placed for decades, dirt areas with direct connection to the Truckee River, and legacy issues from the historic downtown area. This project proposes improvements to reduce sediment loads entering the Truckee River which is a sediment impaired water body. LID BMPs are proposed along the shoulders of West River Street and unpaved parking areas within the downtown area. Treatment improvements will be used whenever possible and may include a combination of LID strategies such as vegetated swales, filter strips, bio-retention areas, rain gardens, and adjacent parking area improvements as well as improvements to improve water quality such as sand traps and drain inlets with sumps. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Reducing pollutant loads to the Truckee River is a requirement of the a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Phase 2 MS4 permit for Truckee and the TMDL requirements that are EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so included in the permit. provide description. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Political Support—List related There is a Stormwater Citizens Advisory Committee that includes the MOUs, agreements or TACs Town of Truckee and Placer County currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.32334 Longitude: -120.19320 Project Location Description Along West River Street between Placer County Line and Bridge Street (e.g., along the south bank of on the north side of the Truckee River. stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Reducing pollutant loads to Available standards in accordance with the r Yes the Truckee River is a monitoring data attainment date, and participate in r N/A requirement of the Phase 2 along the Truckee the development of future TMDLs. MS4 permit for Truckee and River can be the TMDL requirements that evaluated before are included in the permit. and after the In addition to sediment,the project. proposed BMPS would also provide pollutant load reduction for other pollutants of concern, such as heavy metals and oil and grease. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by LIDS and erosion control Square feet of LID implementing measures such as r Yes retrofits will be installed as a improvements stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A part of the project. and number of control/restoration to meet Water sand trap drain Quality Objectives (WQOs)for inlets installed. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Project will install LID and Square feet of LID wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes erosion control, which will improvements to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A improve water quality of the and number of processes. adjacent Truckee River, sand trap drain thereby improve the inlets installed. ecosystems within and adjacent to the river. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices Yes to meet state goals. W N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- r' Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F%0 N/A Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Fv N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Project will install LID and Square feet of LID bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes erosion control, which will improvements associated uplands to support healthy r N/A improve water quality of the and number of watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife adjacent Truckee River, sand trap drain and plant habitats. thereby improve the inlets installed. ecosystems within and adjacent to the river. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and V N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Fv' Yes Project will improve storm Additional caused by existing and new drain treatment system to volume of new development. F N/A better accommodate existing stormwater to be and new development. treated. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as V N/A supported by current and future watershed science. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Project is adjacent to Placer Inter-agency multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes County,with whom agreements. Region for information exchange. r. N/A coordination may be necessary, especially if improvements to the Donner Creek bridge are included in the project. IWM3 - Increase public education and Project may include project Number of awareness of watershed functions, r Yes outreach and education outreach events protection and restoration needs to r N/A effort. and publications encourage stewardship by the public. produced. IWM4- Promote activities that Project replace storm drains Additional reduce flood risk. F%0 Yes with higher-capacity systems volume of new F N/A to better accommodate flood stormwater to be flows. treated. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Provides water quality data 34 square miles water quality,water supply, r Yes trends over time and data of watershed groundwater recharge,flood r N/A helps direct land use management) in local and regional planning decisions. planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A The Truckee River terminates in considerations. Pyramid Lake, located within the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Reservation. Reductions in sediment loads benefits this as well as the fisheries including Lahontan Cutthroat Trout. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A -- c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Project also includes Class II bike lanes climate change3. that promote non-motorized travel. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Project also includes Class II bike lanes emissions(e.g.green technology). that promote non-motorized travel. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes F%7 No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes FV_ No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F_ Yes Fy- No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? System Reoperation "' Yes Fv- No -- Water Transfers F_ Yes F,/_ No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater Yes rv- No -- Desalination r' Yes r,/- No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes r,/- No -- Recycled Municipal Water !— Yes r,/- No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes rv- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F%o No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation t— Yes P No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes r No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes r No Project implements LID and erosion control retrofits. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes r No -- Urban Runoff Management ; Yes No Project implements LID and erosion control retrofits. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes F,/_ No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F,/_ Yes F_ No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F No Project implements LID and erosion control retrofits to reduce pollution in Truckee River. Forest Management Yes r,_/ No -- Land Use Planning and Management Yes rv- No -- Recharge Areas Protection Yes No -- Water-dependent Recreation Yes I%o No -- Watershed Management r Yes r- No Project implements LID and erosion control retrofits to reduce pollution in Truckee River. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management t— Yes FV_ No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1000000 $2,000,000 needed 0 3000000 OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $45,000 0 45000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F,/ Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 500000 0 Half of project Phase 2 500000 0 any portion of the monitoring program can be reduced or tailored to fit the available funding Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s)of funding for Project Measure V and AB $2,000,000 cost 1600 Traffic Impact Fees d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding General Fund As Needed and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Maintenance will continue to be performed by will be financed for the 25-year planning Town of Truckee Public Works/Street Maintenance period for project implementation (not grant Division Staff(funded through local funds). funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Monitoring has been implemented since 2009. planning, bid, etc.) These Planning based primarily of 5-year Capital Improvement Project budget g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes N-1 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Roadway will be widened but minimal water the project is not funded. (300 words or less) I quality improvements will be installed. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/A Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage dual Start al Completion Project Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r` Yes Consultant has been 12/1/2013 4/1/2014 Evaluation r r No hired to develop 30% and final plans. r N/A b. Final Design r- Yes -- 4/1/2014 12/1/2014 Iv- No N/A c. Environmental r Yes -- 4/1/2014 12/1/2014 Documentation r No (CEQA/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting r Yes -- 4/1/2014 4/1/2015 r ry No r N/A e. Construction r Yes -- 3/1/2015 5/1/2015 Contracting r PO No r N/A f. Construction W Yes -- 5/1/2015 10/1/2015 Implementation r r` No r N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River Water Quality project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Monitoring Plan, General Plan, Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat TMDL, NPDES permit, Basin Plan, Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Truckee Capital Improvement Project Budget b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Initial design has started. It will research has been conducted) of the proposed project in include a drainage study. 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. d Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe LID will be used and recycled asphalt concrete will be permitted. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management i— Yes No v N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? i— Yes F_ No WO N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements i— Yes r- No r%_0 N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F_ Yes F_ No FV_ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No %0 N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No Po N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the Yes No %o N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Tahoe City Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Kelli Twomey Name of Secondary Contact Tony Laliotis Mailing Address PO Box 5249,Tahoe City, CA 96145 E-mail ktwomey@tcpud.org;tlaliotis@tcpud.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-580-6338; 530-580-6053 Other Cooperating CA Dept. of Public Health, Placer County Water Agency, CA Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Tahoe Conservancy,JMA Ventures Is your agency/organization Yes. committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant project is the (Briefly describe the project, in design, permitting, and construction of a permanent surface water 300 words or less) treatment plant on the West Shore of Lake Tahoe utilizing Lake Tahoe as the water source. Water service along the West Shore of Lake Tahoe suffers from an inefficient, ineffective, disjointed, delivery system. Separate water systems were constructed subdivision by subdivision, and most are well over 40 years old, some dating back to the early 1900's.There are seven different water systems serving approximately 2,800 connections and none are in full compliance with current California Department of Public Health (CDPH) standards. Several are in violation of primary drinking water standards and others are in violation of secondary drinking water standards. All have source capacity issues for either their primary or back-up sources and there is a lack of adequate storage to meet fire suppression standards throughout the area. Due to the small numbers of connections in each system (most are under 500) these systems are significantly undercapitalized to meet today's drinking water standards. The West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant project will provide adequate water source to address these water supply needs on an integrated, regional basis. The project replaces an interim seasonal water treatment plant that TCPUD constructed in 2004. The interim plant has reached its useful life and needs to be replaced.The West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant provides a long- term solution to water delivery needs along the West Shore of Lake Tahoe and offers an integrated, regional approach to improving water quality and water delivery. The project includes design, permitting, CEQA compliance, public outreach and construction. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Total number of projects 1 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 of 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes.The West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, (WLTRWTP)will replace an existing seasonal treatment plant that EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so produces 300 GPM and it will have the capacity to serve up to seven provide description. water companies, producing up to 1,820 GPM along the West Shore of Lake Tahoe. Political Support—List related TCPUD and the McKinney Water District currently have a Mutual MOUs, agreements or TACs Water Aid Agreement in place and,the new treatment plant will have currently in place. the capacity to provide water and back-up storage for up to seven of the water companies along the West Shore of Lake Tahoe.TCPUD anticipates agreements with a minimum of several of the water companies in the project area.The project is supported by Placer County Water Agency(they approved a grant for preliminary study) and the CA Department of Public Health. Project Location: Latitude: 39.07137 Longitude: -120.14410 Project Location Description Chamberlands Drive, in Tahoma, CA 96142 on the West Shore of Lake (e.g., along the south bank of Tahoe stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- standards in accordance with the F_ Yes attainment date, and participate in F N/A the development of future TMDLs. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The new treatment plant Improves implementing measures such as F Yes replaces an interim approximately stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ N/A treatment plant that is in the 1,000 sq. ft of control/restoration to meet Water floodplain of McKinney floodplain. Quality Objectives (WQOs)for Creek.As part of the project, receiving water bodies established in the interim plant will be the Basin Plan within the planning removed, improving the horizon. floodplain. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water Currently, seven separate The new supplied by public water systems F,, Yes water systems along the treatment plant continues to meet Federal and State F_ N/A West Shore of Lake Tahoe will provide an standards. provide water service to emergency back- 2,800 residents and up supply and businesses. None of these adequate storage systems is in full compliance for all seven with CDPH standards.Two water systems. are in violation of primary drinking water standards and all have source capacity issues. In addition, there is a lack of adequate water storage to meet fire suppression standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering F- N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r- N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet The new water treatment The current plant projected demands for a 20-year F- Yes plant will increase water produces 300 planning horizon. F N/A production significantly and GPM, the new meet projected demands for plant will produce up to seven water systems, up to 1,820 GPM. for the life of the project (50 years). Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or TThe interim water Will meet all replace infrastructure to reliably r- Yes treatment plant has outlived state and federal supply water. F_ N/A its useful life and will be regulations for up removed. It will be replaced to seven water to reliably supply water to up systems and up to 2,800 residents and to 2,800 businesses. connections. WS3 - Implement and promote water Water conservation -- conservation measures and practices F Yes measures are already in place to meet state goals. Fi N/A for all TCPUD customers. GWM1 - Maintain and monitor Fv Yes Constructing a new The new plant groundwater supply to assure future integrated surface treatment reduces the reliability. F N/A plant will improve the area's overall, long-term dependence on management of California's groundwater as groundwater resources by the only source of providing a viable alternative water supply. to groundwater for up to seven water systems. GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Fv N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Constructing one regional One integrated, bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes water treatment plant that regional water associated uplands to support healthy F N/A can serve up to seven water treatment plant watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife systems and 2,800 domestic instead of up to and plant habitats. water connections reduces seven individual the amount of habitat facilities. disturbance created by building multiple treatment facilities. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F_ Yes existing invasive species and Fi N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with The construction of the Fire protection public and private landowners, F Yes WLTRWTP addresses a for over 2,000 activities to manage forest health and F N/A critical need by increasing the acres of land and wildfire risks. quantity of water available up to 2,800 for emergency fire homes and protection. businesses. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Fv Yes Constructing one integrated, One integrated, caused by existing and new regional water treatment regional water development. F_ N/A plant instead of multiple treatment plant treatment facilities minimizes instead multiple the impact on the plants. environment. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future r N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project is an integrated, TCPUD,Tahoma multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes regional project that solves Meadows Water Region for information exchange. F_ N/A water delivery and water Co., Madden storage issues for up to seven Creek Water Co., water systems.The project Tahoe Cedars involves collaboration with Water Co.,Tahoe the seven water systems. Swiss Village Utilities, Skyland/Nielsen Water Co. & Timberland Water Co. IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F_ Yes protection and restoration needs to F- N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM F N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. A regional treatment plan Seven water water quality,water supply, Yes provides a consolidated systems are groundwater recharge,flood F- N/A approach to more efficiently dependent on management) in local and regional use and manage limited groundwater planning efforts and support efforts water resources. Building a sources. Project to continue improving the science. surface water treatment addresses climate plant diversifies the water change for all sources allowing the region seven water to adapt to climate change. systems. IWM6- Monitor water storage, TCPUD is an active member -- release and exchange activities in r Yes of the Tahoe Water Suppliers order to improve coordination with F N/A Association, a regional, regional planning. collaborative group of water suppliers. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: The West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant meets a total of 11 of the objectives stated in the Tahoe Sierra Plan Update.They include: WQ1, WQ4,W51, W52, GWM1, ER1, ER3, ER4, IWM2, IWM5 and IWM6. Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F- N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A A small portion of the project area serves a low income and economically disadvantaged community. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F- N/A New plant diversifies the water climate change3. sources, providing a drought resistant source of water to ensure region's adaptation to climate change. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F N/A By consolidating facilities,there will be emissions (e.g.green technology). a reduction in vehicle miles travelled Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM for maintenance and monitoring.This reduces greenhouse gas emissions. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r- N/A Other benefits of the project include: not already mentioned elsewhere. increase protection of forest habitat; reduce energy consumption for duplicative facilities;enhance the scenic corridor along Lake Tahoe; and increase public access to Lake Tahoe and public lands. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes F No The WLTRWTP uses new technology and equipment that is significantly more energy efficient than what is currently being used.This will reduce the overall energy consumption of up to seven individual water systems that are operating older, inefficient systems. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes No -- System Reoperation F--'- Yes F No The new treatment plant changes the existing operation of up to seven water systems to address existing compliance issues,to increase water supply reliability and to increase the water systems drought preparedness. Water Transfers r Yes Fv- No -- Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes F- No Currently all seven water systems are dependent on groundwater sources. The new surface water treatment plant diversifies the water sources and reduces the dependency on groundwater. Desalination IJ Yes R' No -- Precipitation Enhancement I- Yes F-, No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes F No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local (✓ Yes r- No The WLTRWTP involves the construction of a surface treatment plant utilizing Lake Tahoe as the water source.The new plant provides improved water quality and water storage for to up to seven water systems along the West Shore of Lake Tahoe. Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F- No The new treatment plant provides a Distribution reliable supply of safe drinking water that meets all State and Federal regulations,for up to seven water systems along the West Shore of Lake Tahoe. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F No -- Pollution Prevention Yes F No Greenhouse gas emissions will be reduced because of the reduction in energy consumption. Salt and Salinity Management I- Yes F No -- Urban Runoff Management F- Yes R No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes F No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes r- No The new treatment plant replaces an interim treatment plant that is in the floodplain of McKinney Creek. As part of the project,the interim plant will be removed, improving the floodplain. Forest Management r Yes F- No The construction of a regional water Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? treatment plant increases the quantity of water available for emergency fire protection for over 2,000 acres of land on the West Shore of Lake Tahoe. Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F_ No Constructing the WLTWTP provides a more efficient and effective use of land on the West Shore of Lake Tahoe. One regional solution versus up to seven different treatment plants provides better use of land and a more efficient way to deliver water. Recharge Areas Protection F_ Yes F No There is not a recharge area however the new treatment plant provides an alternative to groundwater. Water-dependent Recreation r Yes F_ No Lake Tahoe provides a precious outdoor recreation facility.The new treatment plant will replace the interim treatment plant that is located in a heavily used recreational area, providing access to publicly owned lakeshore. Watershed Management r Yes F_ No The WLTRWTP project is an integrated approach that offers a significant advance in better managing our water resources on the West Shore of Lake Tahoe. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes F No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 7000000 $$293,910 1251000 8544911 OR F- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $140,568 0 140568 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? .. Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 1251000 0 Design, CEQA, Permitting,ROW /Easement/ Land Acq, Funding, Bidding Phase 2 1823478 0 The first phase of construction will be in 2015 Phase 3 5470432 0 Construction and project completion in 2016 Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project PCWA $37,000 cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding CDPH SRF, CDPH $1,214,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Prop 50, LTCFPP e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs TCPUD Board of Directors are in support of the new will be financed for the 25-year planning treatment plant, and are committed to the District period for project implementation (not grant funding the operation and maintenance of the new funded). plant. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if This project is critically important to solve the the project is not funded. (300 words or less) water delivery issues on the West Shore of Lake Tahoe. TCPUD will continue to pursue funding opportunities to ensure the project is completed. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and (— Yes TCPUD has engaged a 2/1/2013 3/1/2014 Evaluation R_ No professional engineering firm to complete the f N/A preliminary design reports and site evaluations. b. Final Design f Yes Final plans, specifications 3/1/2014 1/1/2015 F_ F_ No and estimates will be prepared for the new F N/A surface water treatment plant. c. Environmental r Yes A public draft 3/1/2014 10/1/2014 Documentation r ( No EIS/Proposed Mitigated (CEQA/NEPA) Negative Declaration will f N/A be prepared and TCPUD will complete all CEQA documentation. d. Permitting f Yes TCPUD will secure all 3/1/2014 12/1/2014 7 C" No necessary environmental permits for the project. N/A e. Construction IJ Yes TCPUD will call for bids, 3/1/2015 5/1/2015 Contracting F_ No open project bids and award project to lowest 7 N/A bidder. f. Construction IJ Yes TCPUD will issue a Notice 5/1/2015 10/1/2016 Implementation r No to Proceed and construction of the West IJ N/A Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant will begin. Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning 2010 Urban Water Management Plan,Tahoe City Public documents the proposed project is Utility District, amended October 18, 2011 Tahoe City consistent with or supported by Public Utility Water Master Plan, West Yost&Associates, (e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, April 2002 Northwest Lake Tahoe Area Water System GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Master Plan Project, Placer County Water Agency, Basin Plans,etc.) February 2010 b. List technical reports and studies July 24, 2013, Final Technical Memorandum - supporting the feasibility of this McKinney/Quail Water System and Regional Supply Source project and Demand Evaluation, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants September 27, 2013, FINAL DRAFT -Technical Memorandum WTP Process Evaluation and Selection, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants c. Concisely describe the scientific TCPUD contracted with Kennedy Jenks (KJ),to provide basis(e.g. how much research has professional engineering services related to the been conducted) of the proposed preparation of site selection and preliminary design for the project in 300 words or less. new water treatment plant.To date, KJ has prepared two technical memorandums and a comprehensive site analysis that provide a scientific basis for the proposed project. In the first technical memorandum,the Regional Supply Source and Demand Evaluation, existing supply sources are reviewed and water demands are provided through the year 2030 for each of the water service areas, to estimate the necessary capacity of the WLTRWTP.The second technical memorandum,the Water Treatment Plant Process Evaluation and Selection, presents an overview of the source water quality; the treatment processes to meet CDPH's filtration and disinfection requirements; detailed design criteria for the overall and specific treatment processes; and the advantages and disadvantages of the alternative treatment processes.Lastly, KJ completed a comprehensive site analysis process.The research conducted as part of the site analysis process, includes:An analysis on the technical feasibility of the project, including the usable area and shape of the site; the groundwater level at the site; the topography and geology of the site; and the presence of Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM contamination within the site and its conveyance areas.An analysis of the geographic location including the proximity to the lake intake; and the access to infrastructure.An analysis of the land use capability including the ability to acquire private property and the acquisition cost of private property. An analysis of the environmental impacts of constructing the plant, and the relative project costs. d. Does the project implement green F- Yes F No F N/A technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques. e 1.If so please describe LID techniques will be implemented. Also,TCPUD will utilize variable frequency drives on the pumps which will use less power and reduce energy consumption. e. If you are an Urban Water 1. Have you completed an Urban Water F- Yes F No F N/A Management Plan and submitted to DWR? 2. Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes F No F N/A 3. Do you comply with the water meter F- Yes F No F N/A requirements(CWC§525) 4. If the answer to any of the questions F Yes F No F N/A above is"no", do you intend to comply prior to receiving project Provide Explanation if necessary:-- funding f. If you are an Agricultural Water 1. Have you completed and submitted F Yes F_ No Fv_ N/A an AWMP(due 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit F Yes F_ No Fv_ N/A an AWMP prior to receiving project Provide Explanation if necessary:-- funding? g. If the project is related to 1. Has a GWMP been completed and r Yes F_ No Fv_ N/A submitted for the subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed F Yes F No F N/A within 1 year of the grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization North Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Suzi Gibbons Name of Secondary Contact Will Stelter Mailing Address PO Box 139,Tahoe Vista, CA 96148 E-mail sgibbons@ntpud.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-553-5433 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Carnelian Woods Tanks Site EIPs Project Category P Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description This project includes the relocation of a portion of the existing (Briefly describe the project, in unpaved access road and water transmission for the District's 300 words or less) Carnelian Woods Water Tanks that are partially located within an SEZ, BMPs (including asphalt grindings) and revegetation of the existing access roads to the tank sites. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to No a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related NTPUD Board and CTC MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.68383 Longitude: -120.08219 Project Location Description This project is located off of Silver Pine Drive in Carnelian Bay, CA. (e.g., along the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Tahoe Sierra IRWM Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- standards in accordance with the F_ Yes attainment date, and participate in F- N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Erosion control and -- implementing measures such as r Yes restoration to stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ N/A reduce/eliminate pollutant control/restoration to meet Water run-off into an SEZ. Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F- N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State F- N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F- N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F- N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future Yes reliability. Fv- N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for improvements to impacted r N/A groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Fv- N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Revegetation of upland area -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes of SEZ will help support to associated uplands to support healthy F N/A support healthy downstream watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife watersheds. and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and F- N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. F N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as F- N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. Fi N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to Fi N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes Fv_ N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge,flood management) in local and regional N/A planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with regional planning. N/A Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. Ri N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F- N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency I- Yes Fv No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes R- No -- Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance - Regional/ local F Yes No -- System Reoperation F_ Yes No -- Water Transfers r- Yes r No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes r No -- Desalination r Yes F No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes r No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes r No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/Local r Yes F No -- Improve Water Qualit Drinking Water Treatment and r" Yes F No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes r No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F No -- Pollution Prevention F- Yes F No -- Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes r No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes v No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes v No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F No -- Forest Management r Yes F No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes r No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes r No -- Watershed Management r Yes r No Restoration of the access road will help protect the watershed from damaging effects of erosion. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes F No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 737618 $$- 0 737618 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 -- Phase 2 -- Phase 3 -- Phase 4 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project None secured yet $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding NTPUD funding 50% and certainty of the sources for Project cost. dependent on Board budget approval e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs NTPUD's annual operating budget will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, 95%PS&E planning, bid, etc.) Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Continued erosion in Carnelian Canyon will the project is not funded. (300 words or less) continue from NTPUD vehicles driving on the access road to perform maintenance on water storage tanks. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes -- -- -- Evaluation r No r N/A b. Final Design r,-, Yes 95% PS&E has been -- -- 7 r No completed r N/A c. Environmental Yes CEQA has been -- -- Documentation F No completed and adopted. (CEQA/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting r Yes -- -- -- r f" No fv— N/A e. Construction r Yes Dependent on funding 1/1/2016 3/1/2016 Contracting r No CJ N/A f. Construction r Yes Dependent on funding 5/1/2016 10/1/2016 Implementation r- No r N/A Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed -- project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No R N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management r Yes F No F- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? r Yes F- No F- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements `r Yes No F- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F- Yes No v N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due ; Yes • No v N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F- Yes F- No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No v N/A subject basin? Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization North Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Suzi Gibbons Name of Secondary Contact Will Stelter Mailing Address PO Box 139,Tahoe Vista, CA 96148 E-mail sgibbons@ntpud.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-553-5433 Other Cooperating Lake Tahoe Fire Protection Partnership, North Tahoe Fire Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Protection District Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Dolly Varden Water Main Replacement Projects Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Relocate and upsize approximately 4,500 linear feet of an under- (Briefly describe the project, in sized, mid-block water main between Cutthroat and Dolly Varden to 300 words or less) Dolly Varden Avenue from Chipmunk to State Highway 267, Chipmunk Street from Cutthroat to Speckled, and connection of new water main in Dolly Varden to Wolf to increase system reliability and reduce leakage. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to No a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related NTPUD Board, Lake Tahoe Fire Protection Partnership MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Longitude: Project Location Description This project is located on Dolly Varden Avnenue in Kings Beach, CA. (e.g., along the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Tahoe Sierra IRWM Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- standards in accordance with the F_ Yes attainment date, and participate in F- N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as F_ Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F- N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water Replace undersized, aging, -- supplied by public water systems F Yes leaking mid-block water continues to meet Federal and State F_ N/A mains with little to no access standards. for repairs or maintenance. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r- N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1 - Provide water supply to meet The replacement water main -- projected demands for a 20-year r- Yes will be 8" in diameter which planning horizon. F N/A will provide increased flows to meet demand and fire protection. WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or The replacement water main -- replace infrastructure to reliably r- Yes will be 8" in diameter which supply water. F N/A will provide increased flows to meet demand and fire protection. WS3 - Implement and promote water This will replace old, leaking -- conservation measures and practices r- Yes water mains which will to meet state goals. F N/A reduce unaccounted for water, helping to meet the required 20/20 reduction. GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future Yes reliability. F N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- programs to prevent the spread of F- Yes existing invasive species and Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) colonization of potential future r- N/A invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and F- N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. F N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. Fv_ N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to encourage stewardship by the public. r N/A IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes F N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge,flood management) in local and regional r N/A planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with regional planning. N/A Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community Fv- N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F- N/A The replacement water main will increase flow for domestic and fire protection within the grid community of Kings Beach, an identified Disadvantaged Community. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F- N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas Fv- N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are Fv- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r- Yes F_ No Will help meet the 20/20 reduction requirement by the replacement of aging leaking water mains, resulting in less water waste. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local [— Yes [7, No -- System Reoperation F Yes F_ No -- Water Transfers r Yes r No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F_ Yes F No -- Desalination r Yes F No -- Precipitation Enhancement [— Yes No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes F No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F No Replace ageing and leaking water Distribution mains for domestic and fire protection. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation [" Yes P_ No -- Matching Water Quality to Use 7 Yes No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes Fv- No -- Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes F No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes r No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes 7 No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes f7, No -- Forest Management r Yes R_ No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes W No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes F No -- Watershed Management r Yes F,1_ No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes F No -- Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1200000 $$- 1200000 OR F DAC 2. Annual Operations and $5,000 5000 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F_ Yes r- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 -- Phase 2 -- Phase 3 -- Phase 4 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project None secured yet $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding NTPUD funding Dependent on grant and certainty of the sources for Project cost. dependent on Board amount budget approval e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs NTPUD's annual operating budget will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Conceptual based on historical water main projects. planning, bid, etc.) Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F_ Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if This project must be completed prior to the the project is not funded. (300 words or less) completion of the Placer County Commercial Core project and would reduce District's capital funds which would delay other water main replacement projects, potentially not meeting 20/20 reduction requirement by target date. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes Need has been identified 8/1/2007 -- Evaluation R_ V No in the District's Water Master Plan and Kings r N/A Beach Grid Master Plan. b. Final Design r Yes -- -- -- 7 W No r N/A c. Environmental f Yes Notice of Exemption is -- -- Documentation r r No planned for this project. (CEQA/NEPA) (� N/A d. Permitting r" Yes -- -- -- r r No 7 N/A e. Construction r Yes -- 1/1/2015 3/1/2015 Contracting F, r No f— N/A f. Construction r Yes It is anticipated that this 5/1/2015 10/1/2016 Implementation F, W No project will take two construction seasons. F_ N/A Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed UWMP, Water Master Plan project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Kings Beach Grid Master Plan feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No Y N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management r Yes F No F- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? r Yes F- No F- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements `r Yes No F- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F- Yes No v N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due ; Yes • No v N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F- Yes F- No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No v N/A subject basin? Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization North Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Suzi Gibbons Name of Secondary Contact Will Stelter Mailing Address PO Box 139,Tahoe Vista, CA 96148 E-mail sgibbons@ntpud.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-553-5433 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Kingswood West Tank Site EIPs Project Category I� Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description This project includes the relocation of the existing 285 foot long, (Briefly describe the project, in eroding access road to the District's Kingswood West Water Tank, 300 words or less) BMPs and revegetation of the existing access road, and paving of the new access road with AC grindings. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to No a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related NTPUD Board and CTC MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.24625 Longitude: -120.06681 Project Location Description This project is located at the terminus of Kings Vista Court in Kings (e.g., along the south bank of Beach, CA. stream/river between river miles or miles from Tahoe Sierra IRWM Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- standards in accordance with the F_ Yes attainment date, and participate in F- N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Erosion control and -- implementing measures such as r Yes restoration to stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ N/A reduce/eliminate pollutant control/restoration to meet Water run-off Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F- N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State F- N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F- N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F- N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future Yes reliability. Fv- N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for improvements to impacted r N/A groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Fv- N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and F- N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- caused by existing and new Yes development. F N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as F- N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. Fi N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to Fi N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes Fv_ N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge,flood management) in local and regional N/A planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with regional planning. N/A Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. Ri N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F- N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency I- Yes Fv No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes R- No -- Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance - Regional/ local F Yes No -- System Reoperation F_ Yes No -- Water Transfers r- Yes r No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes r No -- Desalination r Yes F No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes r No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes r No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/Local r Yes F No -- Improve Water Qualit Drinking Water Treatment and r" Yes F No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes r No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F No -- Pollution Prevention F- Yes F No -- Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes r No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes v No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes v No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F No -- Forest Management r Yes F No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes r No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes r No -- Watershed Management r Yes r No Restoration of the access road will help protect the watershed from damaging effects of erosion. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes F No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 88660 $$- 0 88660 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 -- Phase 2 -- Phase 3 -- Phase 4 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project None secured yet cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding NTPUD funding 50% and certainty of the sources for Project cost. dependent on Board budget approval e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs NTPUD's annual operating budget will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, 95%PS&E planning, bid, etc.) Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Continued erosion of the access road will continue the project is not funded. (300 words or less) from NTPUD and cell phone company's vehicles driving on the access road to perform maintenance on water storage tank and cell phone towers and equipment. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r- Yes -- -- -- Evaluation F (— No CJ N/A b. Final Design Yes 95% PS&E has been -- -- F No completed N/A c. Environmental I✓ Yes CEQA has been -- -- Documentation r 7 No completed and adopted. (CEQA/NEPA) 7 N/A d. Permitting r Yes -- -- -- r r No F N/A e. Construction Yes Dependent on funding 1/1/2016 3/1/2016 Contracting r No N/A f. Construction r Yes Dependent on funding 5/1/2016 10/1/2016 Implementation F_ No N/A Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed -- project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes IR No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management r Yes F No F- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? r Yes F- No F- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements `r Yes No F- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F- Yes No v N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due ; Yes • No v N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F- Yes F- No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No v N/A subject basin? Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California Name of Primary Contact Joy Peterson x1213 Name of Secondary Contact Jennifer Johnson x1218 Mailing Address 919 Highway 395 South, Gardnerville NV 89410 E-mail joy.peterson@washoetribe.us Phone (###)###-#### 775-265-8600 ext. 1213 Other Cooperating -- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Woodfords Community Wastewater Infrastructure Upgrades Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Project includes replacement of 1200 linear feet of wastewater main (Briefly describe the project, in with new main and evaluation of current wastewater treatment pond 300 words or less) liner for possible replacement. Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to -- a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related -- MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 38.79400 Longitude: -119.75290 Project Location Description The Woodfords community is located on Diamond Valley Road in (e.g., along the south bank of Woodfords, California. stream/river between river miles or miles from Tahoe Sierra IRWM Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- standards in accordance with the F_ Yes attainment date, and participate in F- N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Replacement of leaking -- implementing measures such as F Yes wastewater delivery pipes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ N/A will reduce the possibility of control/restoration to meet Water pollutant loads to Indian Quality Objectives (WQOs)for Creek. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F- N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State F- N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering N/A processes. Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or This project is the Approximately replace infrastructure for reliable r- Yes replacement of leaking, 1200 linear feet collection,treatment and disposal of F_ N/A inefficient wastewater of wastewater wastewater. infrastructure with reliable delivery line; collection and treatment pond liner infrastructure. approximately 1.5 acres if fully replaced WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year F_ Yes planning horizon. Fi N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F- N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater The replacement of leaking -- protection activities for high quality r- Yes and inefficient wastewater groundwater, and advocate for F N/A delivery infrastructure will improvements to impacted protect the groundwater groundwater quality through public from being impacted by education. possible pollution from wastewater leakage. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F_ Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Fi N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Indian Creek, a freshwater -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes delivery system that flows to associated uplands to support healthy F_ N/A the East Fork of the Carson watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife River,would be enhanced and plant habitats. through protective efforts by the Woodfords Community wastewater infrastructure Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM improvements. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. N/A ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. F N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future r N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and This project will increase the -- awareness of watershed functions, r- Yes public's awareness of the protection and restoration needs to F N/A effects on the environment encourage stewardship by the public. that result from wastewater leakage and the need to protect the groundwater and downstream fisheries. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, Yes groundwater recharge,flood management) in local and regional r N/A planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F- Yes order to improve coordination with regional planning. r N/A If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A The Washoe Tribe is a Native considerations. American community. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. J—' N/A The Woodfords Community is 100% DAC with median household income of 28,000. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A This project directly benefits an environmental justice community as the Woodfords community is a minority group. d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F- N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F- N/A -- emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are Fi N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes Po No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transf Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes r No This project is the improvement of local wastewater conveyance systems. System Reoperation r Yes F No -- Water Transfers r Yes W No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes No -- Desalination r Yes F No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes No -- Recycled Municipal Water F Yes No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes F No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes r,7, No -- Pollution Prevention F- Yes r No This project will prevent wastewater leakage from contaminating the groundwater and downstream surface water. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes (✓ No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r" Yes F No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes r No -- Forest Management r Yes No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes No -- Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes F No -- Watershed Management r Yes No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes No -- Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 600000 $$- 0 600000 OR F DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 200000 There are no 0&M Leak detection efforts to costs in the prioritize wastewater construction phase. replacement; design and planning for wastewater pipeline replacements. Phase 2 200000 There are no 0&M Design,construction of the costs in the first phase of wastewater construction phase. pipeline installation as prioritized in the design phase. Phase 3 200000 There are no 0&M Design,construction of the costs in the second phase of construction phase. wastewater pipeline installation as prioritized in the design phase. Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- $- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M Costs are included in the Woodfords will be financed for the 25-year planning Community general fund. period for project implementation (not grant Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F_ Yes F No h.Please describe what impact there may be if This project provides wastewater conveyance and the project is not funded. (300 words or less) treatment upgrades to protect the integrity of the system. Without this project, possible acquifer pollution and pollution of downstream fisheries could occur. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes Although wastewater 7/1/2014 12/1/2014 Evaluation FV No delivery pipe system has been completed,the F N/A evaluation of the liner still needs to be done. b. Final Design Fv Yes Based on the assessment -- -- F No and evaluation of the wastewater system, pipe f N/A has been identified for replacement. c. Environmental Yes Washoe Tribe is exempt -- -- Documentation C-.. No from CEQA/NEPA (CEQA/NEPA) standards. N/A d. Permitting F_ Yes Permits will not be -- -- �— F_ No necessary to Washoe Tribal property. F N/A Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. Construction (— Yes Project will need to be 2/1/2015 5/1/2015 Contracting No bid and contracts executed. C N/A f. Construction r Yes Installation of the 1200 5/1/2015 10/1/2015 Implementation R- r No linear feet of upgraded wastewater lines and f N/A possible liner replacement is still needed. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Washoe Tribe land use plan project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Video camera footage of current feasibility of this project wastewater delivery system performed 2008. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Sewage leakage has been identified research has been conducted)of the proposed project in to contain pollutant loads; repair 300 words or less. and replacement of wastewater infrastructure is the solution to this problem d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. i Yes F No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No Fv- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F- Yes F- No N/A (CWC§525) Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No v N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due I Yes , No Y N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior r Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the I Yes No Fv N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the I Yes I No fv— N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California Name of Primary Contact Joy Peterson x1213 Name of Secondary Contact Jennifer Johnson x1218 Mailing Address 919 Highway 395 South, Gardnerville NV 89410 E-mail joy.peterson@washoetribe.us Phone (###)###-#### 775-265-8600 ext. 1213 Other Cooperating -- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Woodfords Community Water Infrastructure Upgrades Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Project includes replacement of approximately 600 linear feet of (Briefly describe the project, in water main with new main and associated water services, updating 300 words or less) meters, fire hydrants, water main connections, site restoration including landscaping and appurtenances.The project has two benefits: replacing aging, leaking water infrastructure to preserve water supplies and increasing the fire protection capabilities at the site. Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes,this project is part of a community and region wide water a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, conservation program. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related -- MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description The Woodfords community is located on Diamond Valley Road in (e.g., along the south bank of Woodfords, California. stream/river between river miles or miles from Tahoe Sierra IRWM Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- -- standards in accordance with the F_ Yes attainment date, and participate in F- N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as F_ Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F- N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State F- N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F- N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1 - Provide water supply to meet This project helps to maintain The CUWCC projected demands for a 20-year r- Yes the water supply for the research planning horizon. F N/A Woodfords Tribal maintains that Community. waterline leaks in water delivery systems can waste up to 20% of water production. WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or The waterline replacement 600 linear feet replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes project will upgrade existing approximately, supply water. F N/A water system components including service with more efficient and lines reliable infrastructure. WS3 - Implement and promote water This project will conserve -- conservation measures and practices r Yes water by replacing aging to meet state goals. F N/A leaking waterlines. It will implement and promote water conservation measures and practices with an emphasis on leak detection for identifying the highest priority waterlines for replacement. GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F-i N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for improvements to impacted r N/A groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural F- N/A Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and F,'_ N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with The waterline replacement 600 feet of public and private landowners, R- Yes will provide for better replacement activities to manage forest health and F N/A fireflow for fire protection, as water supply wildfire risks. well as installing fire hydrants pipe. in the community. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- r Yes caused by existing and new development. R_ N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The partnership consists of -- multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes all the water suppliers in the Region for information exchange. F N/A Tahoe Sierra region and the Washoe Tribe will work with these agencies to coordinate the implementation of Best management Practices for Water Conservation. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IWM3 - Increase public education and This project will increase the -- awareness of watershed functions, r- Yes public's awareness of water protection and restoration needs to F- N/A conservation efforts through encourage stewardship by the public. outreach efforts and public meetings. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes Fv- N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Every water conservation Leaking water water quality,water supply, r Yes effort is a direct benefit to supply groundwater recharge,flood F N/A future climate change distribution pipes management) in local and regional effects, which call for are estimated to planning efforts and support efforts increased water storage and contribute to 20% to continue improving the science. water supply. This project is water production the replacement of leaking loss. water supply distribution pipes that will result in water savings within the system. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with F- N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F N/A The Washoe Tribe is a Native considerations. American community. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F N/A The Woodfords Community is 100% DAC with median household income of 28,000. Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. I N/A This project directly benefits an environmental justice community as the Woodfords community is a minority group. d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F N/A Water source storage and availability climate change3. will be affected by climate change, this program helps to increase available water supply for that eventuality e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F N/A Water conservation efforts result in emissions (e.g.green technology). less drinking water treatment and distribution. Water and wastewater treatment are identified as among the highest of energy users in the country. Less water production and distribution results in less energy utilized, leading to a reduction in ghg. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r" Yes No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency I✓ Yes F No The replacement of leaking water distribution pipes is identified as a Best Management Practice by the CUWCC.This project will implement this BMP and result in significant water savings. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local I— Yes I No This project is the improvement of local drinking water supply conveyance infrastructure. Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? System Reoperation F- Yes F No -- Water Transfers F Yes r No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes r No -- Desalination r Yes F*I- No -- Precipitation Enhancement F Yes F No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes F No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and R Yes F_ No This project is the improvement of the Distribution drinking water distribution system and enhance the sustainability of the water supply. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes P No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r- Yes No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes Ro No -- Salt and Salinity Management r Yes Ro No -- Urban Runoff Management F Yes F No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes FT No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes r No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes r No -- Forest Management r Yes r No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes r No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes I✓ No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes r No -- Watershed Management r Yes r No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes F No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 600000 $$- 0 600000 OR F, DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? .. Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 200000 There are no 0&M Leak detection efforts to costs in the prioritize waterline construction phase. replacement; design and planning for waterline replacements. Phase 2 200000 There are no 0&M Design,construction of the costs in the first phase of waterline construction phase. installation as prioritized in the design phase. Phase 3 200000 There are no 0&M Design,construction of the costs in the second phase of waterline construction phase. installation as prioritized in the design phase. Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M Costs are included in the Washoe Tribe Water will be financed for the 25-year planning Utility revenue annually. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r- Yes i— No h.Please describe what impact there may be if This project provides water savings as well as fire the project is not funded. (300 words or less) protection benefits. Both of these benefits would be lost without funding for project implementation, leaving vulnerable governmental and residential areas without adequate fire protection. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes Leak detection through 1/1/2014 7/1/2014 Evaluation FV_ No water meter database utilization and water use F N/A studies will be completed to prioritize waterline replacement efforts b. Final Design (— Yes Based on priority of 7/1/2014 9/1/2014 No waterline replacement, design for identified f N/A waterlines will be completed. c. Environmental f Yes Washoe Tribe is exempt -- -- Documentation C— No from CEQA/NEPA (CEQA/NEPA) standards. N/A d. Permitting f Yes Permits will not be -- -- N o necessary to Washoe (u Tribal property. N/A e. Construction IJ Yes Project will need to be 2/1/2015 5/1/2015 Contracting 7 No bid and contracts executed. F N/A Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. Construction (— Yes Installation of the 600 5/1/2015 10/1/2015 Implementation r- No linear feet of upgraded water lines, including f N/A installation of fire hydrants. Provide explanation if more The project is currently in evaluation and data assessment stage to than one project stage is prioritize water replacement. Project will still need planning and design checked as current status once the waterlines are identified, as well as contracting and construction. Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Washoe Tribe land use plan; Indian project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Health Services Woodfords Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Community Water System Report Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Indian Health Services Woodfords feasibility of this project Community Water System Report c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Research in the form of leak research has been conducted)of the proposed project in detection and water meter usage 300 words or less. assessments is currently being completed. This data will be used to identify water leaks within the water system. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F- Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F- Yes F- No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes F- No P N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F- Yes F- No P N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F- Yes F- No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F- N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Squaw Valley Public Service District Name of Primary Contact Cindy Herbert Name of Secondary Contact Mike Geary Mailing Address P.O. Box 2026 Olympic Valley, CA 96146 E-mail cherbert@svpsd.org;jmcgraw@svpsd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-583-4692 Other Cooperating Squaw Valley Groundwater Management Plan Advisory Group Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders (stakeholders) &Squaw Valley Groundwater Management Plan Implementation Group Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Aquifer Monitoring Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control iJ Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description In 2007 the District, valley pumpers, and stakeholders established the (Briefly describe the project, in Olympic Valley Groundwater Management Plan (Hydrometrics 2007). 300 words or less) Goal No. 1 of the Olympic Valley GMP is to "Manage the Groundwater basin in a manner that provides a sustainable supply for current and future beneficial uses." Basin Management Objectives (BMO's)were developed to implement and track each of the plans stated goals. BMO 1.1, BMO 1.2, and BMO 3.3 identify aquifer monitoring as a key element in implementing the Groundwater Management Plan's (GMP) stated goals. Aquifer monitoring is required as a key element in management of a water basin in the California Water Code Section 10753.7 (a) (4). Monitoring of all pumping wells in the Truckee River watershed is also a requirement under the Truckee River Operating Agreement (TROA), reporting under TROA is expected to begin within the near future, perhaps in several years.The goal of this project is to assess the monitoring requirements of each of the valleys pumping wells, evaluate the cost to outfit wells with metering equipment and level monitoring equipment, and ultimately to monitor pumping wells and gather that data for the purpose of populating the Olympic Valley GMP Database. Pumping wells may be retrofit with water meters that may be read by the District's Automated Meter Reading (AMR) system.Tracking pumping and aquifer level monitoring will ultimately provide data to update the basin groundwater model on a routine basis and to implement BMO 1.2 " Minimize draw down and maximize use of basin storage', and BM03.1 to "Protect the structure and hydraulic characteristics of the groundwater basin by avoiding withdrawals that cause subsidence." Tahoe Sierra IRWM Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to This project will provide data for further study of the groundwater a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, resource EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support-List related Olympic Valley Groundwater Management PlanCalifornia Statewide MOUs, agreements or TACs Groundwater Elevation Monitoring Program (CASGEM)Tahoe Sierra currently in place. IRWM Objective 3 Project Location: Latitude: Longitude: Project Location Description Various monitoring wells and pumping wells adjacent to and (e.g., along the south bank of contiguous to Squaw Creek within the Groundwater Management stream/river between river Plan basin miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Monitoring pumping impacts The Groundwater standards in accordance with the F,,- Yes and water levels in wells management attainment date, and participate in F N/A adjacent to Squaw Creek will area is identified the development of future TMDLs. help to mitigate and reduce in DWR Bulletin future TMDL's 118 WQ2-Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as F_ Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality Monitoring water levels and Unknown monitoring programs through r Yes pumping are essential to planning horizon, and coordinate F_ N/A water quality monitoring annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water Monitoring water levels and Unknown supplied by public water systems r Yes pumping are essential in continues to meet Federal and State F N/A maintaining safe drinking standards. water and preventing overdraft WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering F- N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F- N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet Understanding and Presently projected demands for a 20-year R Yes quantifying withdrawals is an unknown planning horizon. F N/A essential planning component, data may be used for water supply assessments WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or Metering withdrawals and Increase replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes monitoring aquifer levels is monitoring sites supply water. F N/A an essential component in from 7 to 15 operating the resource WS3 - Implement and promote water Monitoring water levels and Unknown conservation measures and practices F Yes pumping is essential to to meet state goals. r N/A understanding safe yield and establishing conservation goals GWM1 - Maintain and monitor Pi Yes Monitoring the groundwater Unknown groundwater supply to assure future basin is essential to the reliability. F N/A future reliability of the groundwater resource Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater Results from data collected Unknown protection activities for high quality r- Yes may be utilized to advocate groundwater, and advocate for r N/A for groundwater improvements to impacted management directives and groundwater quality through public to educate the public. education. District reports groundwater elevation in real time on web site GWM3 - Manage groundwater for Data collected from Unknown multiple uses (e.g. Yes groundwater monitoring will municipal/industrial/agricultural F N/A be beneficial to all users supply and environmental use). within the watershed ER1 - Enhance and restore water Groundwater monitoring is Unknown bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r- Yes essential in quantifying the associated uplands to support healthy F N/A resource for all uses including watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife fish and wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and fv N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F- Yes activities to manage forest health and R_ N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Fv Yes Groundwater monitoring is Unknown caused by existing and new essential to understanding development. F N/A the limitations of the resource for additional uses IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Monitoring the watershed Unknown water-related planning activities r Yes now is essential to within the planning horizon as F N/A understanding long term supported by current and future impacts from global warming watershed science. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The Groundwater Unknown multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes Management Plan Region for information exchange. F N/A Implementation Group supports monitoring and data dispersion IWM3 - Increase public education and Groundwater monitoring will Unknown awareness of watershed functions, r- Yes assist in understanding the protection and restoration needs to F N/A resource and providing public encourage stewardship by the public. education. Information will be posted on the web IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes F N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Monitoring the watershed Unknown water quality,water supply, r Yes now is essential to groundwater recharge,flood F N/A understanding long term management) in local and regional impacts from global warming planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, Implementation of Unknown release and exchange activities in r Yes groundwater monitoring will order to improve coordination with F N/A feed into the regional data regional planning. reporting required under TROA If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F- N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r- N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. F- N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F- N/A Monitoring groundwater basin now climate change3. will help to quantify future impacts e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes F No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes r No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes P- No -- System Reoperation r Yes r No -- Water Transfers r Yes F—, No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater R Yes No Aquifer Monitoring Program Desalination r Yes iv No -- Precipitation Enhancement r" Yes F-1 No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes r,'_ No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes r No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes r No Avoid overdraft and potentail Distribution subsidence Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F_ No Resource planning Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F_ No Monitoring quantity is essential to controlling quality Pollution Prevention r Yes r No Prevention of groundwater degredation Salt and Salinity Management r Yes Fv- No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and rv- Yes F_ No Participation in CASGEM is required Water Pricing) for future grant programs Ecosystem Restoration rv- Yes r No Enhance aquatic habitat restoration Forest Management F Yes No -- Land Use Planning and Management W Yes No Understanding resource limitations Recharge Areas Protection R Yes No Watershed planning tool Water-dependent Recreation F Yes No -- Watershed Management R Yes No Groundwater Management Plan Objective Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management Yes No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 50000 $$15,000 0 65000 OR F- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $2,500 0 67500 &M)Maintenance (O b.Can the Project be phased? Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 0 0 -- Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Not presently $- cost secured d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding District Capital $15,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Reserves e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O& M will be funded from District operating will be financed for the 25-year planning budget period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Project budget analysis planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The Squaw Valley Groundwater Management Plan the project is not funded. (300 words or less) Advisory Group is a loosely knit group of valley pumpers,water purveyors, interested stakeholders, and the District. The group goal is to identify and implement best management practices,yet no funding mechanism exists to pull projects together. Lack of funding will delay project implementation and prevent resource management from advancing. Loss of valuable data and understanding of resource will be reduced 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/A Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage ctual Start al Completion Project Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes Identify project, prepare 11/1/2013 12/1/2013 Evaluation F_ No project description, budget, schedule N/A b. Final Design r Yes TBD -- -- F_ r No r N/A c. Environmental r Yes Upon Funding/ File -- -- Documentation F_ ry No Categorical Exemption (CECI.A/NEPA) C N/A d. Permitting r Yes -- -- -- r No C" N/A e. Construction f Yes Retrofitting wells for -- -- Contracting F,,- No level transducers will require some well head N/A modifications. Contractor TBD f. Construction F_ Yes Most work will be 6/1/2015 7/1/2015 Implementation F_ r_ No performed by District personnel installing F N/A metering equipment and transducers Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Olympic Valley Groundwater project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Management Plan, HydroMetrics, Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat 2007, Page 65 Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Squaw Valley Groundwater feasibility of this project Development and Utilization Feasibility Study, West Yost 2003, Page 9-4 c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much See project description above. research has been conducted) of the proposed project in Groundwater monitoring provides 300 words or less. the data to do the science d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. i Yes No F- N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F' Yes F- No Fv- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes F No Fv- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes No N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", I Yes No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F- Yes F- No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F- Yes F- No N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the Yes No N/A grant submittal date? Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Squaw Valley Public Service District Name of Primary Contact Mike Geary Name of Secondary Contact Cindy Herbert Mailing Address P.O. Box 2026, Olympic Valley, CA 96146 E-mail cherbert@svpsd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-583-4692 Other Cooperating Squaw Valley Mutual Water Company Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Squaw Valley Mutual Water Co. Intertie Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The citizens of Olympic Valley, California receive drinking water from (Briefly describe the project, in two separate and independent water suppliers. The Squaw Valley 300 words or less) Public Service District (SVPSD) and the Squaw Valley Mutual Water Company (SVMWC) are investigating a joint project to inter-tie the two water systems. The inter-tie, when complete, will allow the two water suppliers a backup water source in case of emergency or natural disaster. A redundant water supply is an essential and proven method of ensuring a safe and reliable water supply. Public water systems have long been encouraged to utilize inter-ties to achieve public health and resource management objectives and have become a standard among water purveyors.The interconnection of water supply systems is recommended in the California Water Code section 10631. Interconnections of public water systems through interties provide a valuable tool to ensure reliable public water supply for each agency's customers. The community benefit from water system interconnections are mutual and prepares the common constituency for emergencies. System failure of either system can easily dictate the need for one agency to support the other by supplying potable water. Other circumstance may also trigger the need to temporarily provide water, such as planned maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, relocation, power outages, convenience, and contamination. The two water suppliers in Squaw Valley both draw water from the Squaw Valley Aquifer. The SVPSD is pursuing a redundant water supply project to obtain water from another source outside the Squaw Valley Aquifer; the interconnection project when completed would give the SVMWC access to that source of supply when it becomes available. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 4 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to No a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related Squaw Valley Groundwater Management Plan MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.20035 Longitude: -120.22790 Project Location Description The preferred location is 1530 Christy Lane at Valley View (e.g., along the south bank of Condominiums in Olympic Valley Ca. stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- -- standards in accordance with the F_ Yes attainment date, and participate in N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as F Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F- N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) annually throughout the Region. Fi N/A WQ4- Ensure that drinking water The interconnection project Unknown supplied by public water systems r Yes would assist in meeting State continues to meet Federal and State F_ N/A and Federal standards in the standards. event a well is contaminated WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r- N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of Fi N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet A redundant water supply Undetermined projected demands for a 20-year r- Yes will serve to meet projected planning horizon. F N/A demand for a 20 year planning horizon by mitigating loss of supply under undetermined circumstances WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or The project will provide New pump replace infrastructure to reliably r- Yes critical infrastructure to Station supply water. r N/A reliably meet projected demands with sources out of service WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices F— Yes to meet state goals. Fi N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- F_ Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality 1J Yes groundwater, and advocate for improvements to impacted Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) groundwater quality through public r- N/A education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for The project will ensure Unknown multiple uses (e.g. Yes reliable water supply for all municipal/industrial/agricultural F N/A users supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy F,'_ N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- caused by existing and new Yes development. F,'_ N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The project seeks to join the Unknown water-related planning activities r Yes combined resources of two within the planning horizon as F N/A water suppliers for purposes supported by current and future of increased reliability watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The project will result in an Unknown multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes MOU for purposed of Region for information exchange. F N/A redundant water supply during emergency or natural disaster IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, r Yes protection and restoration needs to Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) encourage stewardship by the public. R N/A IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes Fv- N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The project will help to Unknown water quality,water supply, R- Yes mitigate the effects of groundwater recharge,flood r N/A climate change through management) in local and regional drought supply planning planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with regional planning. N/A If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F- N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r- N/A The project meets drought supply climate change3. planning objectives e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas R N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Project may increase fire suppression not already mentioned elsewhere. capabilities in an emergency 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes F*I- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes F No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes F_ No Project improves operational efficiency of two water suppliers System Reoperation r Yes No -- Water Transfers r Yes F No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater Fv Yes F_ No Inter-agency cooperation of resource management Desalination r Yes F No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r' Yes r No Supply reliability and/or mitigation for Distribution contamination event Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r' Yes F No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes (✓ No -- Pollution Prevention r' Yes W No -- Salt and Salinity Management r' Yes No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes I✓ No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F No -- Forest Management r Yes r No -- Land Use Planning and Management Yes No -- Recharge Areas Protection Yes No -- Water-dependent Recreation Yes No -- Watershed Management R Yes F No Meets goals and objectives of Squaw Valley Groundwater Management Plan Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r- Yes No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 135000 $$20,000 0 155000 OR F- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $2,500 0 157500 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fv- Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 50000 0 System Modeling/ Design Phase 2 105000 0 Construction Cost Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Placer County Water $20,000 cost Agency GrantDistrict Capital Fund d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The Operations and Maintenance cost will be will be financed for the 25-year planning provided by the District as a portion of the annual period for project implementation (not grant operating budget funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual cost analysis of alternative planning, bid,etc.) interconnection sites g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The SVPSD and SVMWC have discussed the the project is not funded. (300 words or less) benefits of an interconnection for many years. The SVMWC is a small supplier serving only 315 customers so funding is limited. Without grant funding which the SVPSD has secured matching funds from PCWA in the form of a grant;the project will likely continue as it has in the past. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and f Yes District engineers have 7/1/2014 2/1/2015 Evaluation FV No recommended modeling of the two water F N/A companies to ensure the best site has been selected b. Final Design C Yes -- 2/1/2015 12/1/2015 r R No r N/A c. Environmental f Yes -- 10/1/201 2/1/2016 Documentation r I ` No 5 (CECI.A/NEPA) C N/A d. Permitting Yes -- 10/1/201 2/1/2016 r P_ No 5 r N/A e. Construction r Yes -- 3/1/2016 6/1/2016 Contracting 7 ry No IJ N/A f. Construction r Yes -- 7/1/2016 10/1/2016 Implementation r No F_ N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Olympic Valley Groundwater project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Management Plan Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 2012 Site Selection Analysis feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The District has performed a table research has been conducted) of the proposed project in top analysis of hydraulic properties 300 words or less. between pressure zones and performed a site specific analysis of 5 potential locations in order to select the preferred alternative. Hydraulic modeling of the two systems is recommended and included in the project budget d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F- Yes F- No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes F- No R- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements i� Yes F- No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes F- No N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F- Yes F- No N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior Yes No v N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the Yes No N/A subject basin? Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Squaw Valley Public Service District Name of Primary Contact Mike Geary Name of Secondary Contact Cindy Herbert Mailing Address P.O. Box 2026, Olympic Valley, CA 96146 E-mail cherbert@svpsd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-583-4692 Other Cooperating -- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Squaw Creek Siphon Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description Squaw Valley PSD had in operation 3 sewage treatment plants until (Briefly describe the project, in 1976 when the Tahoe-Truckee Sanitation Agency was formed, a 300 words or less) regional treatment facility located in Truckee, California. A trunk pipeline was constructed along the Truckee River in 1976 to convey sewage from Tahoe City along with Squaw Valley and Alpine Springs. A leg of the pipeline, the Squaw Valley Interceptor was extended across Squaw Creek to serve the Winding Creek Subdivision eliminating the Aspens Sewer Treatment Plant. The pipeline crossing under Squaw Creek is known as the Squaw Creek Siphon which is presently 38 years old and being considered for replacement near term (2 years).The Squaw Creek Siphon is a 6" diameter ductile iron pipe approximately 310 feet in length conveying sewage from about 270 homes. The project is in the planning stage at this time with a dewatering/television inspection and corrosion assessment phase of the pipeline project slated for fall 2014. The District did an inspection of the Truckee River Siphon in the fall of 2013 and found that segment of pipeline to be in poor condition; both siphons were installed under the same construction contract.The Squaw Creek Siphon is a highly technical project requiring extensive environmental analysis and permitting to perform a water way crossing. Squaw Creek is an impaired water body USEPA 303 (d) listing and as such will engender scrutiny from permitting agencies such as the Lahanton Region WQCB and Fish and Game. Sewer flows from 270 homes will have to be bypassed to make intertie connections to the new pipe segment and not a drop may be spilled. The District expects to be ready to construct the project in 2015 or 1016. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 5 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to No a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related -- MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.21014 Longitude: -120.20141 Project Location Description Approximately 600 feet west of Highway 89 at bridge over Squaw (e.g., along the south bank of Creek stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- -- standards in accordance with the Yes attainment date, and participate in N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Project provides protection Unknown implementing measures such as Yes of water quality for receiving stormwater LID retrofits, erosion N/A water bodies control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through Yes planning horizon, and coordinate Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) annually throughout the Region. Fi N/A WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems F_ Yes continues to meet Federal and State F N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering Fv_ N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or Project provides critical 310 Linear feet of replace infrastructure for reliable r- Yes infrastructure for conveyance 6" pipeline collection,treatment and disposal of F_ N/A of wastewater across and wastewater. under a receiving body of water WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. Fv_ N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably Yes supply water. Fv_ N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices F_ Yes to meet state goals. Fi N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F- N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for r improvements to impacted N/A groundwater quality through public education. Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural F- N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. r N/A ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. F N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future r N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to N/A encourage stewardship by the public. Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F- Yes F N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge,flood N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with regional planning. N/A If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F- N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r- N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. F- N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r- N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas R N/A -- emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes R- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes F- No Improves local conveyance of wastewater System Reoperation r Yes No -- Water Transfers r Yes F No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F- Yes F No -- Desalination r Yes No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes F No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes r No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes F No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r- Yes No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F' Yes .v No -- Matching Water Quality to Use F- Yes F No -- Pollution Prevention F' Yes Fv- No -- Salt and Salinity Management F- Yes r No -- Urban Runoff Management I`- Yes r No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F- Yes F- No -- Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes F No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F No -- Forest Management F Yes r,,- No -- Land Use Planning and Management r" Yes W No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes Fv- No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes F No -- Watershed Management Yes r No BMP's for watershed management include potential contaminating activities such as waste discharge Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 200000 $$50,000 0 250000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $1,500 0 251500 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 0 0 -- Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project SVPSD asset $50,000 cost replacement fund d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The District already covers O& M costs and will will be financed for the 25-year planning continue to maintain the system through user fees period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F— Yes R_ No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The project would be delayed until funding is the project is not funded. (300 words or less) secured 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes Video Assessment of 9/1/2014 10/1/2014 Evaluation R_ r_ No pipeline planned r N/A b. Final Design r Yes -- 7/1/2014 2/1/2015 r F—, No (� N/A c. Environmental f Yes Neg-Dec or potential 7/1/2014 2/1/2015 Documentation r r No Categorical Exemption (CEQA/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting f Yes Army CorpsFish &Game 7/1/2014 2/1/2015 F No N/A e. Construction f Yes -- 3/1/2015 6/1/2015 Contracting Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM No I N/A f. Construction r Yes -- 6/1/2015 10/1/2015 Implementation F, r No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed SVPSD Sewer Master PlanSVPSD project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Sewer System Management Plan Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much General engineering principals research has been conducted) of the proposed project in dictate 40 year lifespan of most 300 words or less. pipelines. Pipe is presently 38 years old d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F- Yes No F- N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F- No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes F- No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements r Yes F- No F- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", i Yes No v N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No N/A 12/31/12)? Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the r Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Squaw Valley Public Service District Name of Primary Contact Mike Geary Name of Secondary Contact Cindy Herbert Mailing Address P.O. Box 2026, Olympic Valley, CA 96146 E-mail cherbert@svpsd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-583-4692 Other Cooperating -- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization -- committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Truckee River Siphon Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The Squaw Valley Public Service District operates the sewer collection (Briefly describe the project, in system for all of Olympic Valley. Collector lines convey sewage to the 300 words or less) Squaw Valley Interceptor a trunk sewer that terminates at the T-TSA interceptor on the east side of the Truckee River. Prior to its terminus the Squaw Valley Interceptor crosses under the Truckee River through a 10" siphon. The Squaw Valley interceptor was installed in 1976 and is 38 years old; the line is expected to last 50 years or more, however a recent inspection shows the pipe to be heavily corroded and missing much of the interior coating. Additional investigations are being considered to determine the condition and remaining service life, however: Squaw Creek and the Truckee River are highly sensitive environmental treasures, waters of the Truckee supply drinking water to the citizens of Reno and beyond terminating at Pyramid Lake. It is imperative that these waters be protected and that every effort is expended to prevent a major pollution event from happening. Therefore, District engineers have determined it is in the best interest of the District and community at large to install a second and redundant pipeline across and under the Truckee River.The Truckee River Siphon is a 10" diameter ductile iron pipe approximately 400 feet in length conveying sewage from all of Olympic Valley. The Truckee River Siphon is a highly technical project requiring extensive environmental analysis and permitting to perform a water way crossing. The District expects to be ready to construct the project in 2015 or 1016. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 Tahoe Sierra IRWM project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to No a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related -- MOUs,agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.21124 Longitude: -120.19927 Project Location Description Adjacent to south bank of Squaw Creek and south of bridge over (e.g., along the south bank of Squaw Creek on Highway 89 at junction of Squaw Creek and Truckee stream/river between river River miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- -- standards in accordance with the F_ Yes attainment date, and participate in N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Project provides protection Unknown implementing measures such as F Yes of water quality for receiving stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F N/A water bodies control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems F_ Yes continues to meet Federal and State F- N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or Project provides critical 400 Linear feet of replace infrastructure for reliable r- Yes infrastructure for conveyance 10" pipeline collection,treatment and disposal of F_ N/A of wastewater across and wastewater. under a receiving body of water WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year F_ Yes planning horizon. N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F- N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices F_ Yes to meet state goals. Fv N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- F_ Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F_ Yes groundwater, and advocate for N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. F_ Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) supply and environmental use). r- N/A ER1 - Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy Fi N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and Fi N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and Fv_ N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes Project provides redundant Unknown caused by existing and new sewage pipeline preventing development. F N/A pollution of receiving waters IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future r N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes F N/A Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge,flood management) in local and regional N/A planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F,1— N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r- N/A -- c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. F- N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F- N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A -- emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes F No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r" Yes F' No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local Yes F No Improves local conveyance of wastewater System Reoperation r Yes F No -- Water Transfers r- Yes F No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes F No -- Desalination r Yes F' No -- Precipitation Enhancement r- Yes F No -- Recycled Municipal Water r" Yes P— No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes W No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes W No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r- Yes W No -- Matching Water Quality to Use r- Yes F No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes F*I- No -- Salt and Salinity Management r Yes F*I- No -- Urban Runoff Management r' Yes F No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes F*I- No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r' Yes W No -- Forest Management r Yes W No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F No -- Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Recharge Areas Protection r Yes r7, No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes r No -- Watershed Management Yes F_ No BMP's for watershed management include potential contaminating activities including waste discharge Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management I- Yes F_, No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 400000 $$100,000 0 500000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $3,000 0 503000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 0 0 -- Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project District asset $100,000 cost replacement fund d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The District already covers O& M costs and will will be financed for the 25-year planning continue to maintain the system through user fees period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F_ Yes P No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The project would be delayed until funding is the project is not funded. (300 words or less) I secured 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes Corrosion assessment 10/1/201 6/1/2014 Evaluation F- r No 3 r N/A b. Final Design r Yes -- 7/1/2014 2/1/2015 r r,,_ No r N/A c. Environmental 7 Yes Neg-Dec or potential 7/1/2014 2/1/2015 Documentation F No Categorical Exemption (CEQA/NEPA) IJ N/A d. Permitting F Yes Army CorpsFish & 7/1/2014 2/1/2015 r F—, GameCal-Trans No N/A e. Construction f Yes -- 3/1/2015 6/1/2015 Contracting r No (� N/A Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. Construction F Yes -- 6/1/2016 10/1/2016 Implementation F- F No F- N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed SVPSD Sewer Master PlanSVPSD project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Sewer System Management Plan Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much General engineering principals research has been conducted) of the proposed project in dictate that an average pipeline has 300 words or less. a life span of 40 to 50 years. The Truckee River Siphon is 38 years old and badly corroded d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. i Yes No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F- Yes F- No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes F- No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements r- Yes F- No F- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", i Yes No v N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due Yes No v N/A 12/31/12)? Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the r Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedyJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Squaw Valley Public Service District Name of Primary Contact Mike Geary Name of Secondary Contact Cindy Herbert Mailing Address P.O. Box 2026, Olympic Valley, CA 96146 E-mail cherbert@svpsd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-583-4692 Other Cooperating -- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Well 3 Replacement Project Category Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control J Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description SVPSD Well 3 was drilled in 1958 in preparation for the 1960 Winter (Briefly describe the project, in Olympic Games and is currently 56 years old. The well was dedicated 300 words or less) to the District in 1974 as part of the water system conveyed to the District by the State of California. Well No. 3 originally produced 340 GPM, however the well was found to produce sand when operated above 130 GPM, so for many years the well was throttled by means of a butterfly valve installed in the main well house. The well was rehabilitated in 1988 and again in 1997 due to failure of the pump and motor from sand production and corrosion. A leaking underground fuel storage tank (UST) was found adjacent to the well in 1998 and the well was monitored for contamination extensively over the following decade because it does not have a sanitary seal. In order to facilitate the District's pumping plan that is being prepared as part of the Squaw Valley Creek Aquifer Study and to meet the Squaw Valley Groundwater Management Plan practices,the well must be outfitted with a new motor that can be operated by a Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) that has already been installed as part of another project. The VFD will allow the well to be pumped in concert with other wells in the pumping plan which will ultimately minimize pumping impacts on Squaw Creek. Well 3 is in need of rehabilitation but given the age of the well and its proximity to a known contaminate plume it is deemed prudent to replace the well. A properly designed replacement well should be capable of producing at original capacity or greater without producing sand. The District has prepared plans and specifications for the project,which is shovel ready pending a source of funding. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 6 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to No a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related Olympic Valley Groundwater Management PlanSVPSD Master Water MOUs, agreements or TACs Plan currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.19738 Longitude: -120.23061 Project Location Description West end of Squaw Valley in Squaw Valley USA parking lot at 1725 (e.g., along the south bank of Squaw Loop Road (Next to Opera House) stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL -- -- standards in accordance with the F_ Yes attainment date, and participate in N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Project provides capability to UnknownMinimal implementing measures such as F Yes meet future pumping plan stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F N/A requirement,thus limiting control/restoration to meet Water pumping impacts on Squaw Quality Objectives (WQOs)for Creek. Meets Groundwater receiving water bodies established in Management Plan objectives the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) annually throughout the Region. Fi N/A WQ4- Ensure that drinking water A new well with proper Unknown supplied by public water systems r- Yes sanitary seal will reduce continues to meet Federal and State F_ N/A threat of pollutants entering standards. water supply and ensure drinking water standards continue to be met WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering Fi N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of Fi N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet Replaces critical Adds 200 GPM to projected demands for a 20-year r Yes infrastructure so that present existing supply by planning horizon. F N/A and future water demands recovering can be met original capacity WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or Replaces critical Adds 200 GPM to replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes infrastructure so that present existing supply by supply water. F N/A and future water demands recovering can be met original capacity WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. Fv N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor A new well will be outfitted Unknown groundwater supply to assure future Fv Yes with aquifer monitoring reliability. F_ N/A equipment. Data gathering in real time with SCADA control system GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for N/A improvements to impacted Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for Additional capacity will be Unknown multiple uses (e.g. FV Yes utilized for all customer municipal/industrial/agricultural F_ N/A classes supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Project participation in Quantity bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes groundwater pumping plan unknown associated uplands to support healthy F N/A will minimize pumping watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife impacts on Squaw Creek and and plant habitats. potentially increase surface flows ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F' Yes activities to manage forest health and R_ N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. F N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) encourage stewardship by the public. r N/A IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Aquifer monitoring Unknown water quality,water supply, r Yes equipment to be installed in groundwater recharge,flood r N/A new well will provide data for management) in local and regional future scientific analysis. planning efforts and support efforts Addresses climate change by to continue improving the science. providing capacity for drought management IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with regional planning. r N/A If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F- N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F- N/A -- climate change3. Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F- N/A Use of VFD implements bets available emissions (e.g.green technology). technology(BAT)for energy management f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes R- No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local r- Yes Fv No -- System Reoperation r Yes Fv No -- Water Transfers r Yes F No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes F No Demand management/Source capacity Desalination F Yes No -- Precipitation Enhancement F- Yes F No -- Recycled Municipal Water F- Yes F No -- Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r- Yes r No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r' Yes r- No New well may be designed to optimize Distribution water quality in aquifer Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F- Yes F No -- Matching Water Quality to Use 7 Yes F No -- Pollution Prevention F- Yes F No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Salt and Salinity Management r Yes r7, No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes r No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes R_ No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes F No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration f Yes F No -- Forest Management r Yes F No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes No -- Watershed Management r Yes F No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes Fv No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 550000 $$200,000 0 750000 OR F- DAC 2. Annual Operations and $10,000 0 760000 &M)Maintenance (O b.Can the Project be phased? v Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 250000 NA Drill Replacement Well Phase 2 250000 NA Destroy old well & Install well structure &equipment Phase 3 250000 NA Piping and controls to connect to system Phase 4 0 NA -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project District Asset $200,000 cost Replacement Fund d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The District currently provides O & M for Well 3 will be financed for the 25-year planning through operating revenue and will continue to period for project implementation (not grant support the replacement well funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Engineers estimate base upon previous project of planning, bid, etc.) similar size and scope g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes v No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The District inherited a series of old wells from the the project is not funded. (300 words or less) State of California that were constructed 56 years ago. All of those wells have suffered casing failure due to corrosion with the exception of Well 3. Well 1 an identical well to Well 3 was replaced in 2005 at a cost of$650,000. Well 2 which houses the control systems for all 3 wells was replaced in 2011 at a cost of 1.7 million,a project that exhausted the District's reserve funds. Recovery of the reserve fund such that a 25%match may be considered is somewhat difficult due to loss of revenue through the recession. The District strives to meet the Water Code requirement to meet average Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM maximum demand with the largest source out of service. Although well 3 is the smallest well it is currently out of service making it difficult to meet required demands with the loss of any additional source capacity. District well #211 is currently being throttled back due to drought levels in the Squaw Valley aquifer. Therefore,failure by the District to fund a replacement project could result in mandatory cut backs and mandatory conservation practices should the drought worsen. The District seeks grant funding assistance to replace the aging and failing well before it becomes and operational issue. Without funding the project is not likely to proceed for an extended period of time. The project design was completed in conjunction with the Well 1R project in 2005 and stands shovel ready since that time. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes Status is ongoing -- -- Evaluation F_ No r No 7 N/A b. Final Design Fv Yes Plans are complete and -- 10/1/2005 r 7 No bid ready (� N/A c. Environmental r Yes Anticipate a categorical -- 1/1/2015 Documentation F „ No exemption for r (CECI.A/NEPA) infrastructure IJ N/A replacement d. Permitting f Yes Placer County Drilling -- 2/1/2015 No permit is over the counter C" N/A e. Construction C" Yes Plans and specifications 3/1/2015 5/1/2015 Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Contracting , No are shovel ready F N/A f. Construction r Yes -- 6/1/2015 11/1/2015 Implementation � R No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Olympic Valley Groundwater project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Management Plan, HydroMetrics Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat 2007 page 52SVCWD Water Master Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Plan, West Yost 1993, Page 8-2 b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Squaw Valley Groundwater feasibility of this project Utilization and Feasibility Study Update, 2003 West Yost, Page ES17 c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The feasibility of a replacement well research has been conducted) of the proposed project in in or near the present well field is 300 words or less. proven by the succession of well replacements already completed to include District wells 1,well 2, and well 5. The Squaw Valley Groundwater Utilization and Feasibility study included extensive modeling of the aquifer to account for overlying cones of depression and well interactions. The District is currently involved in a Water Supply Assessment and planned well field expansion to be completed in the spring of 2014. Additional test wells were drilled in the aquifer and a modeling update is nearly complete. The results of the additional scientific analysis may play a role in selecting an alternative site for well 3R, however at this point it is safe to Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM say that sufficient scientific analysis has been completed to ascertain the feasibility of the project. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. r Yes F No F_ N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Installing a Variable Frequency Drive for controlling pump motor implements BAT for energy management e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F_ Yes F_ No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F_ No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F_ Yes F_ No Fv- N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due I Yes F_ No R- N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F_ Yes F_ No R- N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the r Yes F_ No F_ N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F' Yes F_ No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Please submit by 17 January 2014 to AraceliCazarez@KennedvJenks.com Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Squaw Valley Public Service District Name of Primary Contact Mike Geary Name of Secondary Contact Cindy Herbert Mailing Address P.O. Box 2026, Olympic Valley, CA 96146 E-mail cherbert@svpsd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-583-4692 Other Cooperating TDPUD, NCSD, Placer County Water Agency, Placer County, Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Alpine Springs CWD, SV Mutual Water Co., SW Gas, SuddenLink, Liberty Energy,ATT Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Redundant Water Supply Project Category F- Restoration r Storm Water/Flood Control Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The Squaw Valley Public Service District (District) is actively pursuing a (Briefly describe the project, in project to procure redundant and supplemental water supplies for 300 words or less) future reliability and beneficial uses of our constituents. In September 2009,the District completed the Alternative/Supplemental Water Supply and Enhanced Utilities Feasibility Study. The purpose of the study was to determine potential project "fatal flaws" and it investigated the feasibility of importing water supplies from outside District boundaries.The Study concluded that the feasibility of the project was apparent based on the available water supply from the Martis Valley; desire of local water purveyors to work with the District on the project; potential transmission main corridors within the Highway 89 corridor and USFS rights of way; there being no major environmental fatal flaws; and interest from natural gas and communications providers in the area partnering with the District to create a utility corridor to provide these services to the Valley and others along the alignment.Phase II of the project titled the Preferred Alternative Analysis is currently moving forward in concert with Placer County's Truckee River Access and Bike Trail Project. Phase II will consist of an alternatives analysis, preliminary design, and updated feasibility study to include cost estimates and a public outreach program. Phase III of the project, the subject of this project description, is the environmental compliance and permitting stage of the project with construction of the terminal tank. The terminal tank will, in the short term, provide system balancing to mitigate the 3 mile distance from the West Tank and enhance fire flows in eastern Olympic Valley. The installation of a utility corridor along the Truckee Tahoe Sierra IRWM River would require compliance with CEQA, Clean Water Act Section 401 and 404, Federal and California Endangered Species Act and California Fish and Game Code Section 1600A. Total number of projects 6 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes, feasibility phase completed, preferred alternative study and a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, preliminary design funded and underway. This is the environmental EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so and 1st construction phase of a large regional project that may provide description. include another project for public access to an aquatic resource (Truckee River Access and Bikeway Project) Political Support—List related Olympic Valley Groundwater Management Plan MOUs,agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.20511 Longitude: -120.20595 Project Location Description The project consists of up to 8.5 miles of utility corridor to be installed (e.g., along the south bank of in concert with the Truckee River Access and Bike Path Project stream/river between river adjacent to the Truckee River between Truckee and Olympic Valley, a miles or miles from supply source, booster station, and terminal tank Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL A redundant water supply Presently standards in accordance with the r- Yes will result in reduced unknown attainment date, and participate in F_ NSA pumping of the Squaw Valley the development of future TMDLs. aquifer thus increasing surface flows in Squaw Creek, a direct impact on TMDL's Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by -- -- implementing measures such as F_ Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F- N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water A redundant water supply Presently supplied by public water systems r Yes will help to ensure the unknown continues to meet Federal and State F N/A continued quality of the standards. Squaw Valley aquifer by reducing reliance on the already limited resource WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Reduced pumping on the Presently wetlands, riparian and upland areas r- Yes Squaw Valley aquifer will unknown to re-establish natural water filtering F_ N/A help to increase in stream processes. flows and restore riparian habitat WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of Fi N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet A redundant and A WSA is being projected demands for a 20-year F Yes supplemental water supply prepared to planning horizon. F_ N/A will provide water for build update quantity out demand for 20 years and necessary. beyond Assume 1,210 Acre Feet WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or Project builds infrastructure 1,210 Acre-Feet replace infrastructure to reliably R Yes for longterm redundancy supply water. r N/A and reliability of water supply Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. F,,- N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor F Yes Project maintains 1,210 Acre-Feet groundwater supply to assure future redundancy and supplements reliability. r N/A water supply GWM2 - Promote groundwater Project includes public Unknown protection activities for high quality F Yes education and outreach groundwater, and advocate for F N/A program improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for Project provides Increase existing multiple uses (e.g. F Yes supplemental supply for supply by 1,210 municipal/industrial/agricultural F_ N/A future users. Positive Acre Feet supply and environmental use). environment impact by reduced pumping of Squaw Valley aquifer ER1 - Enhance and restore water Project promotes reduced Unknown bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes pumping on existing aquifer associated uplands to support healthy F N/A which in turn increases watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife surface flows improving and plant habitats. habitat during low flow periods ER2 - Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F_ Yes existing invasive species and Fv_ N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Project provides fire Unknown public and private landowners, Fv- Yes protection to private activities to manage forest health and F N/A landowners along 8 mile wildfire risks. corridor adjacent to Truckee River where none presently exists Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- caused by existing and new Yes development. F N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future r N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Project will be a coordinated Presently multiple jurisdictions within the r- Yes effort between water Unknown Region for information exchange. F N/A purveyors, county parks department, communications, and gas company IWM3 - Increase public education and Projects promotes goals of Unknown awareness of watershed functions, r- Yes the Squaw Valley protection and restoration needs to F N/A Groundwater Management encourage stewardship by the public. Plan, includes public outreach and education program IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes R_ N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. A long term reliable water Unknown water quality,water supply, r Yes supply is needed to offset groundwater recharge,flood F N/A impacts of global warming, management) in local and regional may become critical planning efforts and support efforts infrastructure in future to continue improving the science. supply scenario. Meets Groundwater Management Plan Goals. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. Fv_ N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F_ N/A Project mitigates long term impacts of climate change3. climate change through drought supply planning e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Bringing natural gas to the region will emissions (e.g.green technology). replace heating oil and propane as the energy source thus reducing green house gases f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F_ N/A Project provides fire protection not already mentioned elsewhere. facilities to residents along Truckee River urban wild-land interface. Bringing natural gas to region will allow the elimination of thousands of propane tanks lowering human risks and reducing fire dangers. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F Yes No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local r Yes No Project reduces reliance on existing supply, provides regional conveyance of resources System Reoperation r Yes r No -- Water Transfers r Yes r No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F Yes r No Project promotes regional solution to long term water supply Desalination r Yes r No -- Precipitation Enhancement F Yes No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes No -- Surface Storage-- Regional/Local Fr Yes r No Project adds 2 million gallon water storage tank to local water system Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F4 Yes r No Project reduces or eliminates need to Distribution treat future groundwater supply Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes r No Project reduces demand on Squaw Valley aquifer Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes r No -- Pollution Prevention F Yes r No Reduced groundwater pumping minimizes pollutant transport Salt and Salinity Management r Yes r No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes r No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes 7 No Reduced groundwater pumping will increase in stream flow and help restore riparian habitat Forest Management r Yes r No -- Land Use Planning and Management r Yes r No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes r No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes No -- Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Watershed Management r Yes F_ No Project implements goals of groundwater management plan Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes F No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project provides for redundant and/or supplemental water supply as mandated by the State of California Water Code section 10610.2 (3) and the Safe Drinking Water Act amendment,the Bio- terrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 300i-4 (b V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 2765000 $$920,000 0 3685000 OR F_ DAC 2. Annual Operations and $10,000 0 10000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F_ Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 323000 0 Feasibility Study, Alternative Analysis, Preliminary Design, Cost Estimates Phase 2 3685000 10000 CEQA, Permitting,Terminal Tank Phase 3 4140000 50000 Well Construction/Booster Station Phase 4 18630000 50000 20"Transmission Main Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Undetermined $-No secured funds are cost presently available d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding PCWAPlacer $-Presently Unknown and certainty of the sources for Project cost. CountyCDPH-SRF e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O& M will be provided by District when will be financed for the 25-year planning constructed through operating revenues. period for project implementation (not grant funded). Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Previous study: Alternative Supplemental Water planning, bid, etc.) Supply and Enhanced Utilities Feasibility Study 2009 Farr West Engineering. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes v No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The subject of this application is the construction the project is not funded. (300 words or less) of a terminal tank and the environmental and permitting phase of a larger regional water supply project to import water from the Martis Valley aquifer to the Truckee River, Olympic Valley, and potentially Alpine Springs CWD, and Squaw Valley Mutual Water Company. Should importing water from Martis Valley, a technically feasible project, become the preferred alternative the total cost of the project may be 26 million dollars or more.The District is actively pursuing funding partnerships with other agencies including Placer County Water Agency, Placer County Parks and Recreation (Truckee River Access and Bike Trail Project), Southwest Gas, Suddenlink Cable,Alpine Springs CWD, developers,and other beneficiaries. It is imperative at this stage the District assume a leadership role in establishing the environmental feasibility, obtain permits,and construct the terminal tank. With the Placer County Truckee River Access and Bike Trail project moving forward the opportunity for a joint project is now. If the project is not funded the future redundancy and reliability of the District water source remains uncertain. The eastern subdivisions in Squaw Valley will continue to suffer from pressure fluctuations and water hammer without the terminal tank to balance water demand. The Squaw Valley aquifer may be further depleted by long term impacts of global warming. Regional growth as projected in the Squaw Valley General Plan will not be possible due to lack of water supply resulting in long term economic impact. The opportunity cost of partnering with Placer County and developers who are considering a natural gas pipeline would be lost. Funding for the EIR stage of the project at this time will put the project on track with other stakeholders and pave the way for forming the funding mechanisms for a project of this magnitude. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/A Planned/Act Current in Each Project Stage ctual Start ual Project Date Completion Stage (mm/yr) Date (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes Feasibility study 11/1/2013 12/1/2014 Evaluation No completed. Alternative analysis and further IJ N/A evaluation of pipeline alignment is currently funded and progressing b. Final Design C Yes -- -- -- r No N/A c. Environmental r Yes CEQA/ NEPA& project 12/1/2014 12/1/2015 Documentation F_ W No permitting is subject of (CEQA/NEPA) this application N/A d. Permitting f Yes CEQA/ NEPA& project 7/1/2014 12/1/2015 r No permitting is subject of this application N/A e. Construction (— Yes -- 1/1/2016 5/1/2016 Contracting r (✓ No N/A f. Construction (— Yes Construction of Terminal 5/1/2016 11/1/2016 Implementation F No Tank is subject of this application C" N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is The District completed a fatal flaw feasibility study in 2009. Currently checked as current status funded is a project to select the proffered alternative and alignment, select pumping facilities and terminal tank locations, and preliminary design with engineers estimates;to be Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Olympic Valley Groundwater project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Management Plan, May 2007 Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat HydroMetrics LLC, Page 53 Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Alternative/Supplemental Water feasibility of this project Supply and Enhanced Utilities Feasibility Study. Eco-Logic 2009 c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The Squaw Valley Aquifer and future research has been conducted)of the proposed project in redundant or supplemental water 300 words or less. supply has been the source of exhaustive research over the past two decades or more. The following reports and studies are a summary of past efforts: Squaw Valley Public Service District 2002 Capacity & Reliability StudyMarch 2003, ECO:LOGIC Squaw Valley Groundwater Development & Utilization Feasibility Study UpdateAugust 14, 2003, West Yost Associates Squaw Valley 2004 Model Update/Updated Sustainable Yield AnalysisAugust 30, 2004, HydroMetrics Groundwater Management Support Activities Groundwater Characterization ReportMay 12, 2005, West Yost Hydrogeological Information Review and Assessment of ASR PotentialMarch 28, 2005, ASR Systems Olympic Valley Ground Water Management Plan 2007, HydroMetrics Age Dating Squaw Valley WaterNovember 20, 2008, Lawrence Livermore Labs Alternative/Supplemental Water Supply and Enhanced Utilities Feasibility StudySeptember 2009, ECO:LOGIC Olympic Valley Creek Aquifer Study Final Report (Draft)November 2013, Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM HydroMetrics Groundwater Resource Evaluation (Martis Valley)November 2000, Nimbus Engineers Independent Appraisal of Martis Valley Groundwater Availability May 2002, Kennedy Jenks Consultants Martis Valley Groundwater Management PlanApril 2013, Balance Hydrologies Martis Valley Surface/Groundwater Interaction Study2012 Interflow Hydrology The District is currently studying alternatives to importing water from Martis Valley and feasibility of a joint utility corridor to serve residences from Truckee to Alpine Springs;the culmination of years of effort paving the way for the environmental phase of the project. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. r Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The joint utility corridor will bring e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes i No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? I Yes F No Pi N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements r Yes F No I N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No Fv- N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:District currently serves less than 3,000 customers f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due I Yes F No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the r Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Alpine County Name of Primary Contact Gavin Feiger, AWG Program Manager Name of Secondary Contact Brian Peters, Alpine County Development Director Mailing Address 50 Diamond Valley Road Markleeville, CA 96120 E-mail alpinewatershed@gmail.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-694-2327 Other Cooperating Alpine Watershed Group, Markleeville Public Utility District Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Markleeville Creek Floodplain Restoration Project Project Category XWater Supply/Wastewater 9- Restoration %0 Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The project will 1) restore the natural stream channel and (Briefly describe the project, in 300 floodplain to improve geomorphic function and reconnect words or less) the stream to its historic floodplain, and 2) relocate and replace aging sewer infrastructure in the floodplain to reduce the threat of water quality impairments from flooding and sewer leaks, 3) construct a storm water capture and infiltration system for highway runoff, and 4) provide public access and recreations features including walking trails and interpretive signage. Total number of projects 1 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 of 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes, this implementation is Phase 2 and 3 of 3. It is also a Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? restoration priority of Carson River Watershed Adaptive If so provide description. Stewardship Plan (2017) and Carson River Watershed Floodplain Management Plan (2008). It also achieves the Markleeville PUD's sewer facility safety assessment and remediation plans. The project is also a component of the Alpine County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Political Support—List related MOUs, MOU with Alpine Watershed Group and Markleeville Public agreements or TACs currently in place. Utility District; MOU with U.S. Forest and Bureau of Land Management regarding land transfer and restoration; Tahoe Sierra IRWM Technical Advisory Committee involved in design review and project planning Project Location: Latitude: N 38.694861 Longitude: W 119.777972 Project Location Description (e.g.,along the south bank of stream/river Along the northwest bank of Markleeville Creek,just between river miles or miles from downstream (east) of Highway 89 bridge in the town of Towns/intersection and/or address): Markleeville. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with F Yes the attainment date, and F N/A participate in the development of future TMDLs. WQ2— Reduce pollutant loads Project will reduce the threat of by implementing measures such 'V Yes water quality impairments from as stormwater LID retrofits, F_ N/A flooding and sewer leaks; project erosion control/restoration to will install storm water treatment meet Water Quality Objectives system for Highway 89 runoff; (WQOs) for receiving water restored floodplain will spread and bodies established in the Basin slow water flows effectively Plan within the planning horizon. reducing erosion and allow trapping of sediments/nutrients during overbank events AWG Project Template Page 2 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality Project involves stream monitoring monitoring programs through Yes component since 2006, involving planning horizon, and F N/A stream bioassessment (benthic coordinate annually throughout macroinvertebrates and riparian the Region. habitat) and chemical monitoring for pre and post-project comparison WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water F Yes systems continues to meet r N/A Federal and State standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded Project site lacks stream bank, 1 acre of streams,wetlands, riparian and R Yes riparian and upland vegetation due floodplain upland areas to re-establish r N/A to past development and reconstructed natural water filtering processes. alteration; Restored floodplain will and riparian reestablish natural water filtering vegetation processes, provide ecological restored benefits of overbanking and establish biogeochemical cycling WQ6-Operate and maintain, Project will replace aging sewer 700 linear feet of build, or replace infrastructure r Yes infrastructure, eliminate all new sewer line for reliable collection,treatment r N/A manholes in the floodplain and through the and disposal of wastewater. reduce the threat of water quality floodplain;4 new impairments from flooding and manholes located sewer leaks outside the floodplain WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a r Yes 20-year planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure Yes to reliably supply water. F N/A AWG Project Template Page 3 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures Yes and practices to meet state W N/A goals. GWM1- Maintain and monitor r Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high r Yes quality groundwater, and F N/A advocate for improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Project will enhance degraded 400 linear feet of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas Fv Yes streams to support healthy native streambank and associated uplands to F N/A fish population; reestablishing stabilized; 1 acre support healthy watersheds, riparian environment will provide of floodplain viable native fish, wildlife and important wildlife habitat and restored plant habitats. travel corridors; project will recover lost habitat due to site development ER2 - Develop and implement Project involves site monitoring 5 acres programs to prevent the spread r Yes and stewardship to prevent any monitored for of existing invasive species and F N/A future infestation weed-free status colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private F Yes landowners, activities to manage r N/A forest health and wildfire risks. AWG Project Template Page 4 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem Sewer system improvements will 700 linear feet of impacts caused b existing and Yes reduce potential for leaks; phase 1 p y g p new sewer line new development. F N/A of the project involved relocating through the the USFS facility and removing floodplain;4 new existing structures from the site; manholes located phase 2 will consist of sewer system modifications; and phase 3 outside the will remove floodwall which floodplain; 250 channelizes stream and increases linear feet of water velocity and bank erosion; floodwall project will revegetate erodible removed; 2 acres soils of land revegetated IWM1 -Conduct local and Project applies proven stream and 2007 Markleeville regional water-related planning r Yes floodplain restoration practices; Creek Restoration activities within the planning r N/A Technical Advisory Committee Design Report horizon as supported by current guiding all aspects of project design and 2013 Design and future watershed science. and implementation Plan provide scientific basis IWM2 - Ensure collaboration Collaboration is an integral part of 8 natural among multiple jurisdictions r Yes the project given the multi resource agencies within the Region for F N/A components of the project— and community information exchange. stream restoration, sewer, and groups public recreation/education;the represented on Technical Advisory Committee Technical provides diverse professional input; Advisory public outreach efforts offer Committee valuable community representation AWG Project Template Page 5 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public Public education component of 10 watershed education and awareness of Yes project will engage community and stewards watershed functions, protection F N/A visitors in learning about monitoring site; and restoration needs to watershed resources and hands-on 30 volunteers encourage stewardship by the activities to assist with restoration assisting with public. and natural resource protection; maintenance; volunteers will also be involved in increased natural long-term project stewardship resource through annual restoration projects awareness of 100 and ongoing site monitoring community members and visitor IWM4- Promote activities that Existing flood wall has exacerbated 250 linear feet of reduce flood risk. lv Yes flooding condition at the site and floodwall r N/A accelerated bank failure removed; 1 acre downstream; reconstructed of floodplain floodplain will permit for reconstructed overbanking and alleviate current flood hazards; project will reduce risk of sewer system inundation due to flooding and reduce risk of sewer pipe failure; reduce flood risk IWM5 -Address climate change Restored floodplain will allow 1 acre of (e.g. water quality, water supply, W Yes stream corridor to accommodate floodplain groundwater recharge,flood F N/A variable flood flows;floodplain will reconstructed management) in local and offer some water storage and and riparian regional planning efforts and attenuate stream flow; improved vegetation support efforts to continue stream bank and riparian area restored improving the science. vegetation will provide a carbon bank IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities r Yes in order to improve coordination r N/A with regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: AWG Project Template Page 6 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Project is being planned in partnership with considerations. Washoe Tribe; representative from Washoe Environmental Protection Department serves on Technical Advisory Committee; working to integrate native American historical and cultural interpretive signs b. Disadvantaged Community r N/A This project is within the Markleeville PUD considerations'. service area which is a disadvantaged community evidenced by an income survey conducted in 2017. c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects r N/A Project will help mitigate potential long- of climate change'. term impacts of climate change as described in IWMS e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse r N/A gas emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that r N/A The local Markleeville community has been are not already mentioned elsewhere. requesting improvements to the popular and visible site in the center of their town for years.This project would address most of those requests. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm AWG Project Template Page 7 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency Yes FV_ No Urban Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F_ Yes F No System Reoperation F_ Yes 17 No Water Transfers F Yes r No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes Fv- No Desalination Yes FV_ No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes FV_ No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes FY-1 No Improve Water Quality dft Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes FV_ No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes r No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes r No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Reduced erosion due to stream channelization and decaying floodwall; reduce potential for sewage leaks/spills Salt and Salinity Management Yes Fy-' No Urban Runoff Management FV_ Yes F_ No Storm water treatment system for highway runoff will be installed Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes P07 No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes FV_ No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration Yes No Provides multiple environmental benefits (chemical, biological, geomorphic and hydrologic) Forest Management F_ Yes FV_ No Land Use Planning and Management Fy-' Yes F_ No Project has been integrated into downtown Markleeville bike and pedestrian plans; helps meet ordinances of the County Code; meets long-standing commitment with U.S. Forest Service to reclaim and remediate property AWG Project Template Page 8 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Recharge Areas Protection F_ Yes FV_ No Water-dependent Recreation FV_ Yes F_ No Will offer stream access, riparian walking trails and natural resource interpretive signage Watershed Management FV_ Yes F_ No High priority restoration project; addressed in multiple watershed management plans Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management FV_ Yes F_ No Alleviates and mitigates flood impacts Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: AWG Project Template Page 9 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non-State Cost Share: Total Cost Grant Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Funding Fund Source Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $1,750,000 $50,000 $1,800,000 OR F_ DAC 2. Annual Operations and $5-10,000 annually for Maintenance (O&M) general maintenance b.Can the Project be phased? v Yes F_ No 1. If so provide cost Project O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Cost Phase 1 Complete Relocate the USFS facility and remove existing structures from the site Phase 2 $600,000 MPUD role Sewer system modifications Phase 3 $1,400,000 $0 Site restoration and sewer activation Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s)of funding for Project District Attorney Trust $27,000 cost Fund d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured Alpine Watershed $23,000 funding and certainty of the sources for Group and County staff Project cost. time e.Explain how operation and maintenance Covered by additional grant funding and partner match costs will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Technical Specifications for Sewer and Restoration planning, bid,etc.) Design Plans g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been FV_ Yes F_ No completed? h.Please describe what impact there may be If this project were not to proceed,the existing if the project is not funded. (300 words or condition of the project site would continue to less) jeopardize water quality and the integrity of the stream channel. The floodwall and stream banks will continue to degrade and jeopardize the stability of the sewer lines through that area. Also the sewer manholes will remain in the floodplain and will risk flooding and sewer leaks. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement,Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. AWG Project Template Page 10 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Planned/Act Planned/ Current Activities in Each ual Start Actual Project Project Stage Date Completion Stage (mm/yr) Date(mm/yr) a. Assessment and XYes Preliminary planning, December Evaluation F F No community outreach 2013 and project assessment F_ Yes F N/A b. Final Design XYeS Sewer and Restoration December F F No Design Plans complete 2014 F N/A c. Environmental XYes Project Description, December Documentation F F No Initial Study and 2014 (CEQA/NEPA) Mitigated Negative N/A Declaration complete d. Permitting F Yes Necessary permitting January August 2017 X XNo packages being 2017 developed F N/A e. Construction F Yes January May 2018 Contracting F XNo 2018 F N/A f. Construction F Yes June 2018 December Implementation F XNo 2019 F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status AWG Project Template Page 11 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the Upper Carson River Watershed Stream Corridor proposed project is consistent with or Condition Assessment (2004), Carson River supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan (2017), GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Carson River Watershed Floodplain Management Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Plan (2008) b. List technical reports and studies supporting 2007 Markleeville Creek Restoration Design the feasibility of this project Report and 2013 Design Plan provide hydro- geomorphic analysis and modeling c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. Environmental consultants have conducted how much research has been conducted) of hydraulic and geomorphic assessment, collected the proposed project in 300 words or less. supplemental observations of site geomorphology, hydraulics and vegetation, validated flood model for existing conditions and done engineering review of sewer system modifications. As mentioned above, the project has been identified as a restoration priority in multiple watershed assessments. d. Does the project implement green r Yes F No XN/A technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water F Yes F No F N/A Management Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter F Yes F No F N/A requirements(CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions F Yes F No F N/A above is"no", do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an F Yes F No 7 N/A AWMP (due 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an F Yes F No F N/A AWMP prior to receiving project Provide Explanation if necessary: funding? AWG Project Template Page 12 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and F_ Yes F No F N/A submitted for the subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within F Yes r No r N/A 1 year of the grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. AWG Project Template Page 13 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Alpine Watershed Group Name of Primary Contact Gavin Feiger, AWG Program Manager Name of Secondary Contact AWG Executive Director Mailing Address P.O. Box 296 Markleeville, CA 96120 E-mail alpinewatershed@gmail.com Phone (###)###-#### (530) 694-2327 Other Cooperating Alpine County, USFS Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Friends of Hope Valley, American Rivers. Is your agency/organization The Alpine Watershed Group believes in this project and is committed to the project through committed to see the project through to completion. We have completion? If not, please explain developed a strong coalition with the US Forest Service and are helping develop the project. We also have many vested partners committed to the project to ensure success. II. General Project Information Project Title Priority Restoration Project in the USFS West Carson Project Area Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater 9- Restoration r Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The Priority Restoration Project in the USFS West Carson (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Project Area (Project) will implement one project from the words or less) in-progress NEPA analysis being conducted by the Humboldt- Toiyabe National Forest in the West Carson Watershed in Alpine County. The objective of this project is to improve forest health by reducing fuels, enhance aspen stands and maintain meadows. In 2016, USFS began analyzing the approximately 30,000 acre West Carson Watershed, with a focus on improving overall forest health, aspen stand enhancement, and meadow restoration. Due to federal funding changes,the USFS NEPA analysis is now limited to approximately 2,000 acres with the goal of creating shovel-ready projects.The USFS is relying on partners like AWG to implement the projects identified and captured in the NEPA document. USFS is focusing efforts on Scotts Lake, Luther Pass, Armstrong Pass meadows, and old Woodfords canyon data. Conifer encroachment (meadows and aspen stands) are the focus of the type of work to be analyzed under NEPA.AWG will work with USFS and watershed stakeholders to prioritize projects based on cost-benefit and feasibility. The primary restoration opportunities are: aspen stand restoration,vegetation management—including fuels management, restoration, and forest health treatments, Tahoe Sierra IRWM improving habitat for the Endangered Sierra Nevada yellow- legged frog, and restoring streams and meadows. As the preliminary assessment and Proposed Action develop, Armstrong Pass and Luther Pass meadows are looking like high priorities due to conifer encroachment and nearby aspen stands in need of enhancement. Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 of 2 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes, it will be a priority project from the 2,000 acres Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? surveyed by the USFS out of the 30,000 acre watershed.This If so provide description. is a landscape-scale approach. Political Support—List related MOUs, American River's Hope Valley Meadow Restoration agreements or TACs currently in place. Stakeholder and Advisory Committee and Alpine Watershed Group's Restoration and Monitoring Committee and Hope Valley Restoration &Aquatic Habitat Project TAC, USFS internal project team, Alpine Biomass Collaborative. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description (e.g.,along The West Carson watershed consists primarily of 30,000 the south bank of stream/river acres of USFS land from the headwaters at Lost Lakes to the between river miles or miles from Woodfords canyon, near Sorenson's Resort.The project may Towns/intersection and/or address): encompass one or more meadows/stream reaches including: Armstrong Pass, Luther Pass, Scotts Lake, Red Lake/Red Lake Creek, Willow Creek, Woodfords Canyon, or Hope Valley. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) AWG Project Template Page 2 of 14 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL No TMDLs in West Carson Meet West Fork standards in accordance with the r Yes Watershed. The West Fork Carson water Carson River is currently the quality objectives attainment date, and participate in r N/A focus of a TMDL-alternative from Lahontan the development of future TMDLs. Plan being developed in Basin Plan. conjunction with the Lahontan Regional Water Board under U.S. EPA's Vision planning framework. This project would contribute to the efforts and may help avoid TMDL development for the West Carson. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Project will reduce erosion 100-200 acres of implementing measures such as F Yes and sedimentation in the a combination of West Carson River by meadow, riparian stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A implementing bank areas, and aspen control/restoration to meet Water stabilization, riparian stands enhanced Quality Objectives(WQOs)for restoration, and improving or restored. aspen stand health to receiving water bodies established in decrease erosion. the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality Project will continue the The AWG has monitoring programs through Yes ongoing monitoring and been monitoring sampling; and initiate photo water quality in planning horizon, and coordinate F_ N/A monitoring through the Alpine the watershed annually throughout the Region. Watershed Group's since 2004 and Monitoring Program. will continue WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, The Project will provide for 100-200 acres of wetlands, riparian and upland areas F7 Yes wildlife habitat, forest health, a combination of watershed improvements, meadow, riparian to re-establish natural water filtering F N/A fuels reduction, and improved areas, and aspen processes. recreational opportunities. stands enhanced or restored. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. AWG Project Template Page 3 of 14 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. F7 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The Project will provide for 100-200 acres of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and Fv Yes wildlife habitat, forest health, a combination of watershed improvements, meadow, riparian associated uplands to support healthy r N/A fuels reduction, and improved areas, and aspen watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife recreational opportunities. stands enhanced and plant habitats. or restored. ER2 - Develop and implement AWG looks for invasive plants Identify invasive programs to prevent the spread of r Yes and works with partners on species in the existing invasive species and management or eradication project area and r N/A plans as appropriate. develop colonization of potential future management invasive species. plans as appropriate. AWG Project Template Page 4 of 14 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Protect watersheds and 100-200 acres of public and private landowners, r Yes address threats to forest and a combination of rangeland health, including meadow, riparian activities to manage forest health and r N/A catastrophic wildfire across areas, and aspen wildfire risks. the landscape, including stands enhanced Federal, State, and private or restored. land in and directly adjacent Focus on conifer to the Project area. encroachment. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F_ Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Restoration designs will 25 stakeholders water-related planning activities r Yes incorporate current watershed involved in science for the West Carson restoration within the planning horizon as F N/A River, such as the Upper planning process. supported by current and future Carson River Stream Corridor watershed science. Condition Assessment, and meadow restoration techniques that have been successful elsewhere. Designs will also been refined through a collaborative stakeholder review process. Stakeholders will include federal and state agencies, regional and local partners, tribal leaders and local community members. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The Project will continue the 5 relevant multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes coordination initiated through agency/organizati this and other restoration on leaders will be Region for information exchange. r N/A projects in the region. informed by the project. IWM3 - Increase public education and Alpine Watershed Group and 100 community awareness of watershed functions, r Yes Project partners will provide members, protection and restoration needs to education and updates at including school r N/A community meetings, provide children, encourage stewardship by the public. site visits, and conduct youth educated on education at the local school. watershed and forest health. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes F7 N/A AWG Project Template Page 5 of 14 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. This project will create 100-200 acres of water quality,water supply, r Yes meadow, aspen stand, and a combination of forest health conditions that meadow, riparian groundwater recharge,flood r N/A greatly increase resiliency in areas, and aspen management) in local and regional the face of climate change. stands enhanced planning efforts and support efforts or restored. to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: AWG Project Template Page 6 of 14 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Meadow restoration will improve considerations. habitat for the many plants with tribal significance that occur in meadows. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A The downstream DAC community of Alpine Village and the Woodfords Hung a Lel Ti Community would experience any water quality benefits provided by the project. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Riparian restoration improves climate climate change'. resiliency by cooling water, and attenuating peak flood flows. Health aspen stands and forests are more resilient to climate-forced perils such as pests and wildfire. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Improvements in root biomass emissions (e.g.green technology). associated with vegetation increases contribute minimally to carbon sequestration f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A This project with strengthen not already mentioned elsewhere. watershed stakeholders relationship with the USFS. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes Fv- No Urban Water Use Efficiency Yes FV_ No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers AWG Project Template Page 7 of 14 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Conveyance- Regional/local F_ Yes Fv- No System Reoperation F_ Yes Fv- No Water Transfers F_ Yes Fv- No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F_ Yes Fv- No Desalination F_ Yes Fv- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes Fv- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F_ Yes Fv- No Matching Water Quality to Use F_ Yes FY-1 No Pollution Prevention F_ Yes P07 No Salt and Salinity Management F_ Yes FV_ No Urban Runoff Management F_ Yes FY-1 No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes P07 No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and f- Yes Fv- No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes F No This project will improve forest health by reducing fuels, enhance aspen stands, and improve and maintain mountain meadows. Forest Management W Yes F No Improving forest health with fuels management, removing conifers from aspen stands and wet meadow systems. Land Use Planning and Management F_ Yes FV_ No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes FV_ No Water-dependent Recreation r Yes F_ No Tourism is the largest piece of Alpine County's economy and is reliant on watershed health. Aquatic habitat will be improved and user access will be considered. Watershed Management R Yes F_ No This is a watershed management project identified in multiple watershed plans referenced in this project template. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes FV_ No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. AWG Project Template Page 8 of 14 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Other RMS addressed and explanation: AWG Project Template Page 9 of 14 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $450,000 $25,000 TBD $475,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $10,000 $0 Proposed Action analysis and project prioritization. Phase 2 $100,000 $0 Detailed project assessment and design, including CEQA crosswalk and permitting. Phase 3 $340,000 $0 Project implementation and Adaptive Management Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s)of funding for Project CWSD(secured) $5,000 cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding Prop 1 funding from TBD and certainty of the sources for Project cost. CDFW or SNC, NFF e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Restoration projects on National Forest lands will will be financed for the 25-year planning be maintained by the U.S. Forest Service. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Based on similar projects in the H-T, LTBMU,and El planning, bid,etc.) Dorado Forests g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes Fv- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The aspen ecosystem in the West Carson River the project is not funded. (300 words or less) watershed is seeing a steady decline from environmental factors, including drought, conifer encroachment and Sudden Aspen Death. In addition, areas of dense conifer are increasing risk of wildfire and meadows are also being impacted by conifer encroachment. With climate change and drought, these problems will only become exacerbated. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental AWG Project Template Page 10 of 14 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F_ Yes USFS analysis and NEPA— January June 2018 Evaluation PC FX_ No outcome will be a 2016 Proposed Action. F_ N/A b. Final Design F Yes Conceptual and technical July 2018 TBD F Fx— No restoration designs will be developed based on F N/A Proposed Action and prioritization outcomes. c. Environmental F Yes N EPA—Proposed Action July 2018 January 2020 Documentation F 9 No being developed. (CEQA/NEPA) Appropriate N/A environmental documentation will be completed after designs are finalized. CEQA lead TBD. d. Permitting F Yes 404 and 401 permits will TBD January 2020 be acquired from the US F IX No Army Corps of Engineers F N/A and Regional Water Quality Control Board after designs are finalized. e. Construction F Yes TBD—pending January June 2020 Contracting F � No completion of restoration 2020 x designs, documentation N/A and permitting. f. Construction F Yes TBD—pending July 2020 December Implementation F IX No completion of restoration 2021 designs, documentation AWG Project Template Page 11 of 14 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM F- N/A and permitting. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status AWG Project Template Page 12 of 14 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Upper Carson River Watershed project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Stream Corridor Condition Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Assessment (2004), Carson River Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan 2017; Carson River Regional Floodplain Management Plan 2008. b. List technical reports and studies supporting the USFS West Cason Project— feasibility of this project Proposed Action. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much USFS identified priority areas, research has been conducted) of the proposed project in outlined preliminary design and 300 words or less. treatments, conducted cultural surveys on 1,000 acres, and is currently developing a proposed action. Relevant scientific work is also included in the resources identified in this project template. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes K No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes Fx- No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements 17- Yes 17- No IR N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No *- N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No rX N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No Fx- N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No WC N/A subject basin? AWG Project Template Page 13 of 14 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No [;-'X' N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. AWG Project Template Page 14 of 14 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Alpine Watershed Group Name of Primary Contact Gavin Feiger, AWG Program Manager Name of Secondary Contact AWG Executive Director Mailing Address P.O. Box 296 Markleeville, CA 96120 E-mail alpinewatershed@gmail.com Phone (###)###-#### (530) 694-2327 Other Cooperating Alpine County, California Department of Fish &Wildlife, United Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders States Forest Service, Friends of Hope Valley, American Rivers. Is your agency/organization The Alpine Watershed Group believes in this project and is committed to the project through committed to see the project through to completion. We have completion? If not, please explain developed a strong coalition with the responsible land agencies and manyvested partners to ensure success. II. General Project Information Project Title West Carson River Restoration in Lower Hope Valley Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater 9- Restoration F_ Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The West Carson River Restoration in Lower Hope Valley (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Project will support the stabilization of vertically calving words or less) banks along the West Fork of the Carson River, help improve aquatic habitat, and implement recreation user management. The proposed site through lower Hope Valley would support the restorations completed by American Rivers and Alpine Watershed Group between 2014 and 2019. This project will propagate currently ongoing restoration work further downstream into the Pickett's Junction area (the intersection of Highways 88 and 89 in Hope Valey). The approximately two river-miles centered on Pickett's Junction is very important to the tourism and economy of Alpine County, being one of county's most popular fly fishing reaches. The site is also incredibly scenic and a cherished by hikers, birders, snowshoers, and skiers.The reach of the West Carson through Pickets Junction has experienced over 150 years of impacts from activities including ranching, mining, buildings, poorly constructed bridges, highway transportation infrastructure, and recreation. This project will reduce erosion and help stabilize over 800' of the bank along the West Carson Rivers through Pickets Junction, while greatly improving aquatic habitat along 1-2 miles of the reach. This proposal will use a combination of bioengineering and biomechanical treatments,focusing on Tahoe Sierra IRWM using native materials and with possible root wads and rock weirs treatments to stabilize stream banks and improve habitat. The project can be divided into 2 phases: planning-design- permitting(Phase 1), and implementation (Phase 2). Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 2 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger This project will build on three restoration projects completed Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3)? between 2016 and 2019 by American Rivers Alpine If so provide description. Watershed Group along the West Carson within upper and lower Hope Valley. One site is on USFS and the other two are on CDFW lands. This project would significantly benefit current restorations, allow them to leverage even greater ecological benefit, while completing one of the final needed restorations on the Upper West Carson. The West Fork Carson River is currently the focus of a TMDL-alternative Plan being developed in conjunction with the Lahontan Regional Water Board under U.S. EPA's Vision planning framework. This project would contribute to the efforts and may help avoid TMDL development for the West Carson. Political Support—List related MOUs, American River's Hope Valley Meadow Restoration agreements or TACs currently in place. Stakeholder and Advisory Committee and Alpine Watershed Group's Restoration and Monitoring Committee and Hope Valley Restoration &Aquatic Habitat Project TAC. Project Location: Latitude: 38°46'44.53"N (WGS84) Longitude: 119°55'21.60"W Project Location Description (e.g.,along The project is located on the West Fork of the Carson River. the south bank of stream/river The reach is located in Hope Valley,from the fishing piers at between river miles or miles from Pickett's Junction just past the river confluence with Willow Towns/intersection and/or address): Creek.The project covers both California Fish and Wildlife land and United States Forest Service land. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) AWG Project Template Page 2 of 13 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The West Fork Carson River Meet West Fork standards in accordance with the r Yes is currently the focus of a Carson WQ attainment date, and participate in TMDL-alternative Plan being objectives from r N/A developed in conjunction with the development of future TMDLs. the Lahontan Regional Water Lahontan Basin Board under U.S. EPA's Plan Vision planning framework. This project would contribute to the efforts and may help avoid TMDL development for the West Carson. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Project will reduce erosion stabilize over 800' implementing measures such as Yes and sedimentation in the of the bank stormwater LID retrofits, erosion West Carson River by control/restoration to meet Water N/A implementing bank Enhance over 1 stabilization, riparian mile of riparian Quality Objectives(WQOs)for restoration and other erosion receiving water bodies established in control measures. habitat the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality Project will continue the The AWG has monitoring programs through Yes ongoing monitoring and been monitoring planning horizon, and coordinate sampling; and initiate photo water quality at r N/A monitoring through the Alpine this site since annually throughout the Region. Watershed Group's 2004 and will Monitoring Program. continue WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State I� N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, This project aims to increase stabilize over 800' wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes riparian extent in Hope of the bank to re-establish natural water filtering Valley, through bank r N/A stabilization and revegetation. Enhance over 1 processes. It will reduce the amount of mile of riparian sediment entering the river and improve shading by habitat vegetation resulting in reduced sediment delivery and cooler temperatures downstream. AWG Project Template Page 3 of 13 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. R N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). AWG Project Template Page 4 of 13 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water This project aims to increase stabilize over 800' bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes riparian extent in Hope of the bank associated uplands to support healthy Valley, through bank watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife r N/A stabilization and revegetation. Enhance over 1 and plant habitats. It will reduce the amount of mile of riparian sediment entering the river habitat and improve shading by vegetation resulting in reduced sediment delivery and cooler temperatures downstream. ER2 - Develop and implement AWG looks for invasive plants Identify invasive programs to prevent the spread of F Yes and works with partners on species in the existing invasive species and r N/A management or eradication project area and colonization of potential future plans as appropriate. develop invasive species. management plans as appropriate. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts W Yes The reach of the West Carson stabilize over 800' caused by existing and new River is impacted by 2 large of the bank development. r N/A bridges. Both Bridges are undersized and accelerate water flows causing the erosion of downstream banks. The 800 feet of bank stabilization is needed largely due to transportation infrastructure. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Restoration designs will be A minimum of 15 water-related planning activities r Yes developed through a stakeholders will within the planning horizon as collaborative stakeholder be involved in supported by current and future r N/A review process. Stakeholders restoration will include USFS and state planning process watershed science. agencies, regional and local partners, tribal leaders and local community members. AWG Project Template Page 5 of 13 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Restoration in Hope Valley 10 regional multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes will continue the coordination meadow Region for information exchange. initiated other restoration managers will be r N/A projects in the region. informed by Hope Valley restoration projected IWM3 - Increase public education and Alpine Watershed Group and 10 volunteers awareness of watershed functions, r Yes Friends of Hope Valley contributing 300 protection and restoration needs to organize a "Meadow volunteer hours encourage stewardship by the public. N/A Stewards"group of per field season community volunteers that projected conduct water quality monitoring and vegetation improvements at the project site. IWM4- Promote activities that Health riparian increases the Enhance over 1 reduce flood risk. W Yes roughness of streams slowing mile of riparian r N/A water. Enhancing the habitat riparian will delays and reduces peak flood events. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Riparian restoration improves stabilize over 800' water quality,water supply, r Yes climate resiliency by cooling of the bank groundwater recharge,flood water, and attenuating peak management) in local and regional N/A flood flows. Enhance over 1 planning efforts and support efforts mile of riparian to continue improving the science. habitat IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: AWG Project Template Page 6 of 13 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Meadow restoration will improve considerations. habitat for the many plants with tribal significance that occur in meadows. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A The downstream DAC community of Alpine Village and the Woodfords Hung a Lel Ti Community would experience any water quality benefits provided by the project. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Riparian restoration improves climate climate change'. resiliency by cooling water, and attenuating peak flood flows e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Improvements in root biomass emissions (e.g.green technology). associated with vegetation increases contribute minimally to carbon sequestration f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A The restoration will greatly improve not already mentioned elsewhere. riparian habitat along an ADA accessible section of the Carson River and will look at how to better manage recreation use to limit the human impact on the project area. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers AWG Project Template Page 7 of 13 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Conveyance- Regional/local F Yes V No System Reoperation Yes iv No Water Transfers F- Yes Fv- No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F- Yes Fv- No Desalination F- Yes F- No Precipitation Enhancement X No Recycled Municipal Water F- Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F- Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F- Yes F4-0 No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F- Yes Fv- No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes Fv- No Pollution Prevention Fv- Yes F- No Banks stabilization will reduce the amount of suspended sediment downstream of the project. Restoration of Hope Valley prevents sediment from entering source water. The West Fork Carson River is currently the focus of a TMDL- alternative Plan being developed in conjunction with the Lahontan Regional Water Board under U.S. EPA's Vision planning framework. This project would contribute to the efforts and may help avoid TMDL development for the West Carson. Salt and Salinity Management F Yes V No Urban Runoff Management F Yes V No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F- Yes Fv- No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F- Yes Fv- No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration W Yes F- No Bank stabilization and vegetation will restore riparian, aquatic and wet meadow habitat, providing improved and increased plant, fish, and wildlife habitat, water quality, and water supply and flood attenuation benefits. Forest Management Yes Fv- No Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F- No Managing recreation user access and experience. AWG Project Template Page 8 of 13 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Recharge Areas Protection V Yes No Bank stabilization and vegetation will restore riparian providing, water quality, water supply and flood attenuation benefits. Water-dependent Recreation Fy-' Yes F No The restoration will greatly improve riparian habitat along an ADA accessible section of the Carson River. The reach is also a very popular fly- fishing site. Watershed Management Yes F_ No This is a watershed management project identified in multiple watershed plans referenced in this project template. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management FV_ Yes F No Restoration will enhance the Upper West Carson's ability to absorb, store and slowly release floodwaters during events. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: AWG Project Template Page 9 of 13 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $425,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $425,000.00 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Yes F No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $ 125,000.00 Planning, Design and Permits Phase 2 $ 300,000.00 Implementation Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Carson Water 10,000 cost Subconservancy District and American Rivers sub-grant d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Trout Unlimited, Cal $13,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Trout, Caltrans, CDFW, WCB e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs N/A will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Used engineering estimates from projects currently planning, bid, etc.) being implemented in Hope Valley. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes V No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Without this project, the West Fork will continue to the project is not funded. (300 words or less) heavily erode streambanks increasing turbidity in water and reducing riparian habitat. Bank instability will propagate upstream and downstream. In addition, West Carson will go without important enhancement to aquatic and riparian habitat. Finally, the TMDL-alternative plan envisioned by Lahontan and USEPA may not succeed without implementation of restoration projects like this. AWG Project Template Page 10 of 13 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation, Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes Alpine Watershed Group June December Evaluation has conducted nearly 12 2019 2019 Rt No year of monitoring and F N/A assessments to establish baseline conditions and inform project designs b. Final Design F Yes Design will be contracted March February to complete and vet 2020 2021 F No community support for F N/A permit-ready technical designs. c. Environmental F Yes CDFW will lead CEQA. May January 2021 Documentation F RC No 2020 (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F Yes 404 and 401 permits will May January 2021 be acquired from the US 2020 F No Army Corps of Engineers F N/A and Regional Water Quality Control Board e. Construction F Yes TBD February April 2021 Contracting F RC No 2021 F N/A f. Construction F Yes Will include site setup August December Implementation No and mobilization, 2021 2021 construction, F N/A revegetation, and demobilization and clean up. AWG Project Template Page 11 of 13 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Upper Carson River Watershed project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Stream Corridor Condition Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Assessment (2004), Carson River Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan 2017; Carson River Regional Floodplain Management Plan 2008. b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Geomorphic, hydrologic and ecologic feasibility of this project assessments, along with restoration recommendations are highly applicable for the project reach. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Hope Valley Meadow Restoration research has been conducted) of the proposed project in Project- 50% Basis of Design Report 300 words or less. describes Geomorphic, hydrologic and ecologic assessments adjacent to the project reach. The report is highly applicable to the reach area. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes K No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No [9 N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No FX- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No 9 N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No R N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: AWG Project Template Page 12 of 13 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No IX N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No IR N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No rR N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No r N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. AWG Project Template Page 13 of 13 3.15.2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization American Rivers Name of Primary Contact Julie Fair Name of Secondary Contact Luke Hunt Mailing Address 120 Union Street, Nevada City, CA 95959 E-mail jfair@americanrivers.org Phone (###)###-#### (530)478-0206 Other Cooperating Humbold-Toiyabe National Forest, CDFW, Alpine Watershed Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Group Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Priority Meadow Restoration in the Carson Watershed Project Category 9_ Restoration Project Description American Rivers conducted assessments of meadow (Briefly describe the project, in 300 condition on all publically accessible meadows in the Carson words or less) River watershed in 2014.We will pursue meadow restoration on the top two priority sites(in addition to Faith Valley and Forestdale meadows,which are already advancing) in the Carson River watershed.This includes Wet Meadows Reservoir Meadow and Highway 88 West Meadow.These meadows have degraded conditions that diminish their ability to provide natural water storage,flood attenuation, cooling and filtering of water, aquatic and riparian habitat, and recreational values. In addition, Wet Meadows Reservoir Meadow is a priority for California threatened willow flycatcher and federally endangered Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog. Highway 88 West Meadow is within the dispersal area for willow flycatcher to recolonize. The project will restore the hydrologic and ecologic function of each meadow to enhance the range of ecosystem services these meadows have the potential to provide. Restoration activities will vary based on specific site conditions, but may include: stabilizing high, bare streambanks using vegetation and toe stabilization techniques; stabilizing headcuts to Tahoe Sierra IRWM prevent further degradation; raising the water table to maintain and expand wet meadow; and improving fish and wildlife habitat. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 3 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes,this project will build on a watershed-wide assessment Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? of meadow condition conducted by American Rivers in 2014. If so provide description. This project will take the top 2 priority meadow restoration sites in addition to Faith and Forestdale to the next phase by conducting detailed site-specific assessments, creating conceptual and technical restoration designsfor those sites, and completing environmental documentation and permitting. Later phases will include restoration implementation and adaptive management. Political Support—List related MOUs, American Rivers developed a stakeholder group to agreements or TACs currently in place. collaboratively prioritize meadows in the Carson River watershed. We have engaged this group for project planning at these priotiy sites. Project Location: Latitude: Wet Meadows: 38.6060; Highway 88 West: 38.7390 Longitude: Wet Meadows: -119.8642; Highway 88 West: -119.9510 Project Location Description (e.g.,along This project includes two sites located in Alpine County. Wet the south bank of stream/river Meadows Reservoir Meadow is located at the edge of West between river miles or miles from Meadows Reservoir at the end of Sunset Lake Rd, 3 miles Towns/intersection and/or address): from the intersection with Blue Lakes Rd. Highway 88 West Meadow is located along High 88 0.5 miles south of the intersection with Blue Lakes Rd. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) Project Template Page 2 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2-Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as F Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, This project aims to increase 75 acres of wet wetlands, riparian and upland areas W Yes riparian and wet meadow meadow to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A extent at two top priority floodplain processes. meadows in the Carson River restored. watershed through floodplain reconnection, bank stabilization and revegetation. It will also promote increased infiltration and retention in the long term providing additional filtration benefits. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable 17- Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 3 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. F7 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 4 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of Objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water This project aims to improve 75 acres of wet bodies, wetlands, riparian areas and 40 Yes the hydrological connectivity meadow associated uplands to support healthy N/A and vegetation of the floodplain watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife riparian zone and wet restored. and plant habitats. meadow area in top priority meadows in the Carson Watershed. Plants will have improved access to water, birds will have improved cover and food sources, and fish will have increased cover, undercut banks and shading and an overall improvement in aquatic habitat. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes caused by existing and new development. P N/A Project Template Page 5 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Restoration designs will 35 stakeholders water-related planning activities r Yes incorporate current involved in within the planning horizon as r N/A watershed science for the restoration supported by current and future West Carson River, such as planning process. watershed science. the Upper Carson River Stream Corridor Condition Assessment, and meadow restoration techniques that have been successful elsewhere. Designs will also been refined through a collaborative stakeholder review process. Stakeholders will include federal and state agencies, regional and local partners,tribal leaders and local community members. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Meadow restoration in the 25 stakeholders multiple jurisdictions within the Fv Yes Carson Watershed will take involved in Region for information exchange. r N/A place in collaboration with restoration diverse project partners planning process. including natural resource agencies, state research entities, and local non- profits. IWM3 - Increase public education and The project team will conduct 30 people awareness of watershed functions, r Yes public stakeholder review educated about protection and restoration needs to r N/A meetings to educate meadow encourage stewardship by the public. stakeholders and community restoration. members about the benefits of meadow restoration. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes FV N/A Project Template Page 6 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Restoration designs will 1 document water quality,water supply, r Yes incorporate climate change addressing groundwater recharge,flood F N/A projections for the region. climate change management) in local and regional Meadow restoration and meadow planning efforts and support efforts improves climate resiliency restoration in the to continue improving the science. by increasing water storage, Carson improving late season watershed. baseflows, and attenuating peak floodflows. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 7 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Meadow restoration will improve considerations. habitat for the many plants with tribal significance that occur in meadows. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. F7 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Meadow restoration improves climate climate change'. resiliency by increasing water storage, improving late season baseflows, and attenuating peak floodflows. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Improvement in root biomass emissions (e.g.green technology). associated with restoration of wet meadow vegetation (versus xeric) contributes to carbon sequestration. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F- Yes FV- No System Reoperation F- Yes P No Project Template Page 8 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F_ Yes FV_ No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F_ Yes FV_ No Desalination F_ Yes P-0 No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes Fv- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F No Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Banks stabilization will reduce the amount of suspended sediment downstream of the project. Restoration will prevent sediment from entering source water. Salt and Salinity Management F Yes FV_ No Urban Runoff Management Yes FV_ No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes F No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes r No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration RO Yes F No Restoration will restore riparian, aquatic and wet meadow habitat, providing improved and increased plant,fish, and wildlife habitat,water quality,water supply and flood attenuation benefits. Forest Management F_ Yes P-0 No Land Use Planning and Management F_ Yes P-0 No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes Fy_' No Water-dependent Recreation F Yes F_ No Restoration of riparian areas will improve aquatic habitat, benefiting the fishery and improving opportunities for recreational fishing. It will also enhance the recreational experience for camping, wildlife viewing, and others. Watershed Management F_ Yes Fy-' No Improve Flood Management Project Template Page 9 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Flood Risk Management V Yes No Restoration will enhance top priority meadows' ability to absorb, store and slowly release floodwaters during flood events. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 10 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2016 Dollars) $240,000 $25,000 TBD $265,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and -- -- -- Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes i No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $25,000 -- Scorecard Assessment and Prioritization Phase 2 $240,000 -- Detailed assessment and design Phase 3 $60,000 -- Permitting, CEQA/NEPA Phase 4 TBD -- Implementation and Adaptive Management Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project NFWF (secured) $25,000 cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding CDFW Prop 1 TBD and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Funding e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Restoration projects will be maintained by the will be financed for the 25-year planning managing agencies,the Humboldt-Toiyabe National period for project implementation (not grant Forest, and CA Department of Fish and Wildlife. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Based on costs for similar projects in the planning, bid, etc.) Mokelumne, Carson and Walker watersheds. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? i Yes 1,0 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Top priority meadows in the Carson watershed will the project is not funded. (300 words or less) continue to experience erosion and degradation, losing value as natural reservoirs and critical habitat. In particular, if Wet Meadows Reservoir Meadow is not restored, 8 active headcuts threaten to erode and unravel intact meadow habitat. Erosion will continue to contribute to sediment pollution in the Carson Watershed. Project Template Page 11 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes Meadow assessment and May Fall 2019 Evaluation ® prioritization occurred 2019 ® No between 2014 and 2017. F_ N/A Additional detailed site assessments of geomorphic, hydrologic, and ecologic meadow attributes will be conducted at the three priority sites to establish baseline conditions to inform restoration designs. b. Final Design F_ Yes Conceptual and technical Fall 2019 Winter restoration designs will 2019/2020 ® No be developed based on F_ N/A the information collected during detailed sited assessments. c. Environmental F_ Yes Appropriate Winter Fall 2020 Documentation environmental 2019- (CEClA/NEPA) No documentation will be 2020 F_ N/A completed after designs are finalized. d. Permitting F_Yes Permitting including Winter Fall 2020 Section 404 and 401 will 2019- ® No be completed after 2020 F_ N/A designs are finalized. e. Construction F_ Yes TBD—pending Summer- Fall 2021 Contracting No completion of restoration Fall 2021 ® designs, documentation and permitting. Project Template Page 12 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM F N/A f. Construction F Yes TBD—pending Summer- Fall 2022 Implementation No completion of restoration Fall 2021 ® designs, documentation F N/A and permitting. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 13 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Carson River Watershed Adaptive project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Stewardship Plan; Carson River Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Regional Floodplain Management Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Detailed site assessment and feasibility of this project technical design reports will be developed as part of the project. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The two meadow sites that will be research has been conducted) of the proposed project in restored through this project were 300 words or less. selected based on results from the Meadow Condition Scorecard assessment, a science-based rapid assessment method based on quantitative measurements such as bank height, percent bare ground and length of gullies.This process of developing stakeholder-vetted priorities based on rapid assessment data has lead to successful restoration project planning and implementation in the Mokelumne and Walker watersheds. Meadow restoration has been successfully demonstrated in the Feather River watershed by Plumas Corporation for 30 years, establishing it as a well- proven technique. http://www.plumascorporation.org/ our-work.html d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes No ® N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': I.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No Plan and submitted to DWR? ® N/A 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No ® N/A Project Template Page 14 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No ® N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", G Yes ❑ No ® N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due G Yes ❑ No ® N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior ❑Yes ❑ No to receiving project funding? ® N/A Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the ❑Yes ❑ No subject basin? ® N/A 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the ❑Yes G No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 15 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization American Rivers Name of Primary Contact Julie Fair Name of Secondary Contact Luke Hunt Mailing Address 120 Union Street, Nevada City, CA 95959 E-mail jfair@americanrivers.org Phone (###)###-#### (530)478-0206 Other Cooperating Humbold-Toiyabe National Forest,Alpine Watershed Group, Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Friends of Hope Valley, Institute for Bird Populations,Trout Unlimited, CA Department of Fish and Wildlife Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Faith Valley and Forestdale Meadow Restoration Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater ® Restoration F_ Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description This project will restore two priority meadow sites in the (Briefly describe the project, in 300 upper West Fork Carson River watershed: Faith Valley words or less) and Forestdale Meadow. American Rivers and stakeholders identified these sites as priorities based on a watershed-wide assessment of accessible meadows in the Carson watershed.These meadows have impacted meadow conditions and are priority sites for special status species including willow flycatcher and Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog.This project will restore Faith Valley and Forestdale Meadow to enhance the full range of ecosystem services these meadows have the potential to provide including: natural water storage, flood attenuation, cooling and filtering of water, aquatic and riparian habitat, and recreational values. Faith Valley is a 200-acre meadow on the West Fork Carson. Forestdale Meadow is a 40-acre meadow on Forestdale Creek located upstream of Faith Valley. Both sites have active beaver populations and contains some healthy wet-meadow and riparian habitat, but both exhibit incision and streambank instability along much of their stream channels, causing disconnection between the water table and meadow surface, and both have headcuts that are threatening to erode into sections of current intact wet meadow habitat.The hydrology of Tahoe Sierra IRWM these meadows has likely been impacted by historic land use practices, such as poorly managed historic grazing and road construction, as well as recent recreation, limiting their ability to provide natural benefits. This project aims to restore the hydrologic and ecological functions of Faith Valley and Forestdale Meadow by stabilizing the headcuts and stream channel and raising the water table to maintain and expand wet meadow and riparian habitat.This effort is currently in the planning phase, with assessment and design to be completed in 2018. Total number of projects X Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes,this project builds on a watershed-wide assessment of Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? meadow condition conducted by American Rivers in 2014 If so provide description. that identified Faith Valley as a top priority site for restoration. Also, Faith Valley is located just upstream of Hope Valley, a 1600-acre meadow that American Rivers and partners are currently working to restore.The two meadows are components of a larger meadow complex that is an important migration corridor for fish and wildlife.Thus,this project will also build on the current effort to restore Hope Valley to enhance the full migration corridor. Political Support—List related MOUs, American Rivers developed a stakeholder group to agreements or TACs currently in place. collaboratively prioritize meadows in the Carson River watershed. We have engaged this group for project planning in Faith Valley and Forestdale. Project Location: Latitude: Faith: 38'40' 54.03" N; Forestdale: Longitude: Faith: 119°55'47.04" W; Forestdale: Project Location Description (e.g.,along Faith Valley is located along the Upper West Fork Carson the south bank of stream/river River, approximately 3.5 miles South of Hope Valley, along between river miles or miles from Blue Lakes Rd in Alpine County. Forestdale Meadow is Towns/intersection and/or address): located on Forestdale Creek, approximately 2 miles upstream of Faith Valley. It is located off of Forestdale Rd in Alpine County. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Project Template Page 2 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as F Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, ® Yes The project aims to restore 1 project; 240 wetlands, riparian and upland areas degraded wet meadow and acres of wet to re-establish natural water filtering r_ N/A riparian areas in Faith Valley meadow processes. and Forestdale Meadow by restored; 6000 reconnecting the water table linear feet of to the meadow surface.This stream channel will allow the meadow to restored slow and spread flows, enhancing its ability to retain and filter flows. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F7 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor Fy-' Y The project will enhance 1 groundwater es groundwater supply to assure future groundwater storage in 200 monitoring effort; reliability. r N/A acres of meadow. We will groundwater monitor the change in storage increased groundwater pre- and post- by 0.5 feet in 200 project. acres. GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality 17- Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water ® Yes This project aims to improve 1 project; 240 bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and the hydrologic connectivity acres of wet associated uplands to support healthy r N/A and vegetation of the meadow watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife riparian zone and wet restored; 6500 and plant habitats. meadow in Faith Valley and linear feet of Forestdale Meadow. Plants stream channel will have improved access to restored water, birds will have improved cover and food sources, and fish will have increased cover, undercut banks and shading and an overall improvement in aquatic habitat. Project Template Page 4 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and F N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts 7 Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional ® Yes Restoration designs will At least 35 water-related planning activities incorporate current stakeholders will within the planning horizon as F N/A watershed science for the be involved in the supported by current and future West Carson River, such as restoration watershed science. the Upper Carson River planning process Stream Corridor Condition Assessment, and meadow restoration techniques that have been successful elsewhere. Designs will also be refined through a collaborative stakeholder review process. Stakeholders will include federal and state agencies, regional and local partners,tribal leaders and local community members. Project Template Page 5 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among ® Yes Restoration in Faith Valley 2 meetings; 2 multiple jurisdictions within the and Forestdale Meadow will projects; 10 Region for information exchange. F_ N/A have diverse project partner meadow involvement including state, practitioners federal and local resource informed agencies, research entities, and local non-profits and will act as a case-study to inform other meadow restoration projects in the region. We will host stake at least two collaborative stakeholder meetings. IWM3 - Increase public education and ® Yes As part of the Faith Valley and 1 education awareness of watershed functions, Forestdale Meadow program; 10 protection and restoration needs to F_ N/A restoration project, project volunteers encourage stewardship by the public. partners Alpine Watershed contributing 300 Group and Friends of Hope volunteer hours Valley will organize and per field season educate a "Meadow projected. 2 site Stewards"group of visits/ community volunteers that presentations per will conduct project year monitoring and hand labor restoration activities at the project site.The project will also include site visits and presentations for outreach about the benefits of meadow restoration. IWM4- Promote activities that The project will provide 2 projects that reduce flood risk. r Yes wetland enhancement and reduces peak F_ N/A enhance Faith Valley and flood flows Forestdale Meadow's ability to absorb, store and slowly release floodwaters during peak flow events. Project Template Page 6 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWMS -Address climate change (e.g. ® Yes Faith Valley and Forestdale 2 projects water quality,water supply, restoration designs will addressing groundwater recharge,flood r N/A include climate change climate change management) in local and regional predictions for the region. through planning efforts and support efforts Meadow restoration restoration of 240 to continue improving the science. improves climate resiliency acres by increasing water storage, improving late season baseflows, and attenuating peak floodflows. Monitoring of these parameters will inform future projects. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 7 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Meadow restoration will improve considerations. habitat for the many plants with tribal significance that occur in meadows. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. F7 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Meadow restoration improves climate climate change'. resiliency by increasing water storage, improving late season baseflows, and attenuating peak flood flows. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Improvement in root biomass emissions (e.g.green technology). associated with restoration of wet meadow vegetation (versus xeric) contributes to carbon sequestration. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F- Yes FV- No System Reoperation F- Yes P No Project Template Page 8 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F Yes V No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater FV_ Yes F- No This project will implement a project component to increase groundwater storage. Desalination 1— Yes FV_ No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes FV_ No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes FV_ No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F- Yes F4_0 No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F- Yes FV_ No Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes W No Pollution Prevention r Yes F- No Banks stabilization and aggradation will reduce the amount of suspended sediment downstream of the project. Restoration will prevent sediment from entering source water. Salt and Salinity Management F- Yes N-0 No Urban Runoff Management F Yes FV_ No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F- Yes FV_ No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes WO No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F- No The project will restore riparian, aquatic and wet meadow habitat, providing improved and increased plant, fish, and wildlife habitat, water quality,water supply and flood attenuation benefits. Forest Management F- Yes N-0 No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes F No Recharge Areas Protection F- Yes F No Water-dependent Recreation F%O- Yes F- No Restoration of the riparian area will improve aquatic habitat, benefiting the fishery and improving opportunities for recreational fishing. It will also enhance the recreational experience for wildlife viewing, camping and others. Project Template Page 9 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Watershed Management V Yes No Planning for the project has been developed in conjunction with watershed focused groups including the Alpine Watershed Group and the Carson Water Subconservancy. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management W Yes F No Restoration will enhance these meadow's ability to absorb, store and slowly release floodwaters during peak flow events. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 10 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $300,000 $113,000 $113,000 $526,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes i No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $1,000 Scorecard Assessment Phase 2 $226,000 Baseline Assessment, Design and Environmental Documentation Phase 3 $300,000 Implementation and Adaptive Management Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project National Fish and $113,000 cost Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) CDFW Prop 1 $113,000 Alpine Watershed $10,000 Group(In-Kind) d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding TBD and certainty of the sources for Project cost. (implementation) e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Restoration projects will be maintained by the will be financed for the 25-year planning managing agencies,the Humboldt-Toiyabe National period for project implementation (not grant Forest and CA Department of Fish and Wildlife funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Based on costs for similar projects in the planning, bid,etc.) Mokelumne, Carson and Walker watersheds. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F-0 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Without the project, incision and sedimentation the project is not funded. (300 words or less) into the West Carson River will continue. Current headcuts have the potential to erode and unravel intact meadow located above them. Meadow recovery will be on the order of 100s of years instead of 10s of years. Missed opportunity to leverage$226,000 in match and cost share. Project Template Page 11 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and ❑Yes Site assessed using the May Fall 2018 Evaluation ® ® No Meadow Condition 2018 Scorecard in 2014 and F N/A identified as a priority. A detailed assessment, including assessments of geomorphic, hydrologic, and ecologic meadow attributes, is planned for Summer 2018. b. Final Design F Yes American Rivers will work Winter Fall 2019 with the Humboldt- 2018/ ® No Toiyabe and a restoration 2019 F N/A design consultant to develop and complete stakeholder vetted, permit-ready technical designs. c. Environmental F Yes American Rivers and the Fall 2019 Winter Documentation Humboldt-Toiyabe will 2019/2020 (CEQA/NEPA) No complete NEPA and F N/A CEQA for the project, including biological and cultural resource assessments. d. Permitting F Yes American Rivers will Fall 2019 Winter complete all applicable 2019/2020 ® No permits including Section F N/A 404,401 and 1600 to make the project shovel- ready. e. Construction F Yes American Rivers will Spring Summer Project Template Page 12 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Contracting F ® No contract with a qualified 2020 2020 F N/A firm based on a competitive bid process. f. Construction F Yes Will include site setup Summer Fall 2020 Implementation No and mobilization, 2020 ® construction, F N/A revegetation, and demobilization and clean up. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 13 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Carson River Watershed Adaptive project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Stewardship Plan; Carson River Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Regional Floodplain Management Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the A detailed site assessment and feasibility of this project technical design report will be developed as part of the project. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Faith Valley and Forestdale Meadow research has been conducted) of the proposed project in have been selected as a priority site 300 words or less. for restoration based on results from assessment with the Meadow Condition Scorecard, a science- based rapid assessment method based on quantitative measurements such as bank height, percent bare ground and length of gullies.These meadows had ratings of"poor condition"for bank height and bank stability. Faith Valley has also been identified as a priority for restoration by the Institute for Bird populations who conducted bird surveys there in 2012. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. 17- Yes 17- No ® N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No Plan and submitted to DWR? ® N/A 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? 17- Yes 17- No ® N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements 17- Yes 17- No ® N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No ® N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: Project Template Page 14 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No ® N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No to receiving project funding? ® N/A Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No subject basin? ® N/A 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No grant submittal date? ® N/A 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 15 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization American Rivers Name of Primary Contact Julie Fair Name of Secondary Contact Maiya Greenwood Mailing Address 120 Union Street, Nevada City, CA 95959 E-mail jfair@americanrivers.org Phone (###)###-#### (530)478-0206 Other Cooperating Tahoe National Forest,Truckee River Watershed Council Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Priority Meadow Restoration in the Truckee Watershed Project Category 9_ Restoration Project Description American Rivers has conducted assessments of 30 meadows (Briefly describe the project, in 300 in the Middle Truckee River watershed, and has identified words or less) several meadows as candidates for restoration. We will pursue meadow restoration on the top 3 priority sites in the Truckee River watershed, which may include Alder Creek Meadow, Dog Valley, Hoke Valley Meadow, and/or Secret Meadow, dependent on the outcome of a stakeholder review process. These meadows have serious erosion problems that diminish their ability to provide natural water storage,flood attenuation, cooling and filtering of water, aquatic and riparian habitat, and recreational values.All contain stretches of historic habitat for the federally threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout (LCT), and Dog Valley is located approximately 2 miles upstream of current LCT habitat. Alder Creek Meadow is breeding habitat for the California threatened willow flycatcher, and Secret Meadow is critical habitat for the federally endangered Sierra Nevada yellow- legged frog. The project will restore the hydrologic and ecologic function of each meadow to enhance the range of ecosystem services these meadows have the potential to provide. Restoration activities will vary based on specific site conditions, but may Tahoe Sierra IRWM include: stabilizing high, bare streambanks using vegetation and toe stabilization techniques; stabilizing headcuts to prevent further degradation; raising the water table to maintain and expand wet meadow; and improving fish and wildlife habitat. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 of 3 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes, this project will build on a watershed-wide assessment Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? of meadow condition conducted by American Rivers in 2014. If so provide description. This project will take the top 3 priority meadow restoration sites to the next phase by conducting detailed site-specific assessments, creating conceptual and technical restoration designs for those sites, and completing environmental documentation and permitting. Later phases will include restoration implementation and adaptive management. Political Support—List related MOUs, The project established a group of stakeholders to vet agreements or TACs currently in place. priority sites for restoration in Spring 2016, and since has held two meetings to narrow in on restoration priorities. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description (e.g.,along This project may encompass several meadows in the Truckee the south bank of stream/river River watershed, including: 1) Alder Creek Meadow, a 114 between river miles or miles from acre meadow located located along Alder Creek,just Towns/intersection and/or address): upstream from Prosser Creek Reservoir; 2) Dog Valley Meadow, a 414 acre meadow located on Dog Creek, a tributary to the Truckee River; 3) Hoke Valley Meadow, a 120 acre meadow flowing into an eastern finger of Stampede reservoir; and/or 4) Secret Meadow, a 39 acre meadow located on Secret Meadow Creek, a tributary to Independence Creek downstream of Independence Lake. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) Project Template Page 2 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of Objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Truckee River is 303(d) TBD -- monitoring standards in accordance with the r Yes listed for excess sediment at priority sites attainment date, and participate in — N/A and a TMDL has been will allow us to the development of future TMDLs. adopted. Restoring meadows establish on tributaries to the Truckee estimates of River will reduce sediment sediment loading to the Truckee River reduction and help meet TMDL potential through standards. restoration. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The meadow sites identified 39-648 acres of implementing measures such as P Yes in this project contribute wet meadow stormwater LID retrofits, erosion N/A water to the Middle Truckee floodplain control/restoration to meet Water River, which is 303(d) listed restored —acres Quality Objectives (WQOs)for for excess sediment. of wet meadow receiving water bodies established in Restoring meadows in the restored is the Basin Plan within the planning watershed would decrease dependent on horizon. erosion, and the projects will final sites help meet the WQOs for selected. turbidity in the Truckee River HU and Little Truckee River HU. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through Yes planning horizon, and coordinate N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. Project Template Page 3 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, This project aims to increase 39-648 acres of wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes riparian and wet meadow wet meadow to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A extent at 3 top priority floodplain processes. meadows in the Truckee restored. watershed through bank stabilization and revegetation. It will also promote increased infiltration and retention in the longterm providing additional filtration benefits. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. Fv N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. P N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. Project Template Page 4 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water This project aims to improve 39-648 acres of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes the hydrological connectivity wet meadow associated uplands to support healthy F- N/A and vegetation of the floodplain watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife riparian zone in top priority restored. and plant habitats. meadows in the Truckee Watershed. Plants will have improved access to water, birds will have improved cover and food sources, and fish will have increased cover, undercut banks and shading and an overall improvement in aquatic habitat. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A Project Template Page 5 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Restoration designs w i 11 25 stakeholders water-related planning activities r Yes incorporate current involved in within the planning horizon as r N/A watershed science for the restoration supported by current and future Truckee River, and meadow planning process. watershed science. restoration techniques that have been successful elsewhere. Designs will be refined through a collaborative stakeholder review process. Stakeholders include federal and state agencies, regional and local partners and local community members. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Meadow restoration in the 25 stakeholders multiple jurisdictions within the Fv Yes Truckee Watershed will take involved in Region for information exchange. r N/A place in collaboration with restoration diverse project partners planning process. including natural resource agencies, state research entities, and local non- profits. IWM3 - Increase public education and The project team will conduct 30 people awareness of watershed functions, r Yes public stakeholder review educated about protection and restoration needs to r N/A meetings to educate meadow encourage stewardship by the public. stakeholders and community restoration. members about the benefits of meadow restoration. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes FV N/A Project Template Page 6 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Restoration designs will 1 document water quality,water supply, r Yes incorporate climate change addressing groundwater recharge,flood F N/A projections for the region. climate change management) in local and regional Meadow restoration and meadow planning efforts and support efforts improves climate resiliency restoration in the to continue improving the science. by increasing water storage, Truckee improving late season watershed. baseflows, and attenuating peak floodflows. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 7 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Meadow restoration will improve considerations. habitat for the many plants with tribal significance that occur in meadows. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. F7 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Meadow restoration improves climate climate change'. resiliency by increasing water storage, improving late season baseflows, and attenuating peak floodflows. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Improvement in root biomass emissions (e.g.green technology). associated with restoration of wet meadow vegetation (versus xeric) contributes to carbon sequestration. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F- Yes FV- No System Reoperation F- Yes P No Project Template Page 8 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F_ Yes FV_ No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F_ Yes FV_ No Desalination F_ Yes P-0 No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes Fv- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F_ Yes P-0 No Matching Water Quality to Use F_ Yes Fv- No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Bank stabilization will reduce the amount of suspended sediment downstream of restoration sites in the Truckee River, a 303(d) listed water body for sediment pollution. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes FV_ No Urban Runoff Management F Yes F No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes F No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes r No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration WO Yes F No Restoration will restore riparian, aquatic and wet meadow habitat, providing improved and increased plant,fish, and wildlife habitat,water quality,water supply and flood attenuation benefits. Forest Management r Yes FvO_ No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes W No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes 77 No Water-dependent Recreation W Yes F_ No Restoration of the riparian area will improve aquatic habitat, benefiting the fishery and improving opportunities for recreational fishing. It will also enhance the recreational experience for paddling,wildlife viewing, and others. Watershed Management F_ Yes Fy-' No Improve Flood Management Project Template Page 9 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Flood Risk Management P Yes V No Restoration will enhance top priority meadows' ability to absorb, store and slowly release floodwaters during flood events. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 10 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2016 Dollars) $330,000 $25,000 TBD $355,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and -- -- -- Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes 1 No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $25,000 -- Scorecard Assessment and Prioritization Phase 2 $245,000 -- Detailed assessment and design Phase 3 $110,000 -- Permitting, CEQA/NEPA Phase 4 TBD -- Implementation and Adaptive Management Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project NFWF (secured) $25,000 cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding CDFW Proposition 1 TBD and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Funding e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Restoration projects on National Forest lands will will be financed for the 25-year planning be maintained by the U.S. Forest Service. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Based on costs for similar projects in the planning, bid, etc.) Mokelumne, Carson and Walker watersheds. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? I Yes 1,0 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Top priority meadows in the Truckee watershed the project is not funded. (300 words or less) will continue to experience erosion and degradation, losing value as natural reservoirs and critical habitat.They will also continue to contribute to sediment pollution in the Truckee Watershed. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants: Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation, Environmental Project Template Page 11 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and ❑ Yes Meadow Condition May Fall 2019 Evaluation ® ® No Scorecard assessments 2019 F N/A began in 2014 in the Truckee watershed, and a stakeholder-driven list of meadow restoration priorities will be completed in Summer 2016. A written report of the prioritization was published to the UC Davis meadows clearinghouse. Additional detailed site assessments of geomorphic, hydrologic, and ecologic meadow attributes will be conducted at the top 3 priority sites to establish baseline conditions to inform restoration designs. b. Final Design F Yes Restoration designs will Fall 2019 Winter 2019- ❑ be developed as part of 2020 ® NO this project based on the F N/A information collected during detailed sited assessments. c. Environmental F Yes Environmental Winter Fall 2020 Documentation ❑ documentation will be 2019- ® No completed as part of this Project Template Page 12 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A project after designs are 2020 finalized. d. Permitting F Yes Permitting will be Winter Fall 2020 completed as part of this 2019- ® No project after designs are 2020 F N/A finalized. e. Construction F Yes TBD—pending Summer- Fall 2021 Contracting No completion of restoration Fall 2021 ® designs, documentation F N/A and permitting. f. Construction F Yes TBD—pending Summer- Summer Implementation No completion of restoration Fall 2021 2022 ® designs, documentation F N/A and permitting. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 13 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Detailed site assessment and feasibility of this project technical design reports will be developed as part of the project. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The three meadow sites that will be research has been conducted) of the proposed project in restored through this project will be 300 words or less. selected based on results from the Meadow Condition Scorecard assessment, a science-based rapid assessment method based on quantitative measurements such as bank height, percent bare ground and length of qullies. This process of developing priorities based on rapid assessment data has lead to successful stakeholder-driven restoration projects in the Mokelumne, Carson, and Walker watersheds. Meadow restoration has been successfully demonstrated in the Feather River watershed by Plumas Corp for 30 years, establishing it as a well-proven technique. http://www.plumascorporation.org/ our-work.html d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID ❑ No ® N/A techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No ❑ N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No ❑ N/A Project Template Page 14 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No ® N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", G Yes ❑ No ® N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due G Yes ❑ No ® N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior ❑Yes ❑ No to receiving project funding? ® N/A Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the ❑Yes ❑ No subject basin? ® N/A 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the ❑Yes ❑ No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 15 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization California Tahoe Conservancy Name of Primary Contact Joe Pepi Name of Secondary Contact Stuart Roll Mailing Address 1061 Third Street, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail jpepi@tahoe.ca.gov Phone (###)###-#### (530) 543-6066 Other Cooperating US Bureau of Reclamation Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Tahoe Pines Campground Restoration and Public Access Project Category ❑✓ Water Supply/ ❑ ❑Restoration Wastewater Project Description The California Tahoe Conservancy(Conservancy), and (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Bureau of Reclamation(Reclamation), are pursuing the Upper words or less) Truckee River Tahoe Pines Campground Restoration and Public Access(Project) along the Upper Truckee River(UTR). The Project is identified in TRPA's Environmental Improvement Program(EIP) as a project that is necessary to restore and maintain environmental thresholds, including, water quality,recreation and wildlife habitat, for the Lake Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 2 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Project is part of the the Lake Tahoe EIP. Project is identified Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? in TRPA's Environmental Improvement Program(EIP), (EIP If so provide description. Prniect#01 m 01 0001 1 ac n nrniect that i,necec,ary to Political Support—List related MOUs, A Project TAC has been in place and the consists of agreements or TACs currently in place. representatives from local. state. and federal aaencies. Project Location: Latitude: 38 degrees 50' 52.1" N Longitude: -120 degrees 1' 36.63"W Project Location Description (e.g., along The Project is located along the Upper Truckee River near the south bank of stream/river Meyers California in El Dorado County. The study area for the between river miles or miles from project is generally bounded by U.S. Highway 50 on the north, Towns/intersection and/or address): South I Jnner Truckee Road on the west and State Highway 89 Project Template Page 1 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Tahoe TMDL identified .55 acres of standards in accordance with the QYes fine sediment as one of the wetlands will be attainment date, and participate in N/A major pollutant sources. This restored and the development of future TMDLs. ® project will help meet enhanced by this approved TMDL standards for Project. 200 linear ® Yes The Upper Truckee River was .55 acres of channelized and compacted by wetlands will be vehicles exposing it's stream restored and © N/A banks to increased erosive enhanced by this force and disconnecting it project. 200 linear from a portion of the it's feet of stream channel banks WQ3 - Implement water quality A monitoring plan is being monitoring programs through ©Yes developed for the project to planning horizon, and coordinate ®N/A characterize baseline annually throughout the Region. conditions,track project performance in relation to WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems ®Yes continues to meet Federal and State ®N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Restoration of the Tahoe Pines .55 acres of wetlands, riparian and upland areas ®Yes through channel modifications floodplain will be to re-establish natural water filtering will reduce bank erosion and restored and processes. ®N/A result in more frequent enhanced 0 l this inundation of the floodplain. Project. 200 linear WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable ®Yes collection,treatment and disposal of ®N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year QYes planning horizon. Q N/A Project Template Page 2 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably Oyes supply water. ON/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices ®Yes to meet state goals. ®N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor ®Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. (DN/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality ®Yes groundwater, and advocate for ®N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. ®Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural ON/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The restoration of riparian .55 acres of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and ®Yes areas and wetlands of the wetlands will be associated uplands to support healthy (:)N/ATahoe Pines Campground site restored and watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife is important for wildlife, projenhanced linear this because site restoration would feet o stream linear and plant habitats. feet of stream ER2 - Develop and implement This project requires ongoing 8.5 acres regularly programs to prevent the spread of ®Yes surveys of invasive species to surveyed for existing invasive species and ®N/A ensure no spread or invasive species. colonization of potential future colonization in these sensitive areas. invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, ®Yes activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. ®N/A Project Template Page 3 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts ®Yes Site supports significant levels .55 acre of caused by existing and new of biodiversity. This project wetlands will be development. ON/A has potential to replace habitat restored and lost elsewhere and maintain enhanced by this IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Past actions have created the water-related planning activities ®Yes need to restore river and within the planning horizon as ©N/A floodplain ecosystems in the supported by current and future Tahoe Basin to improve the watershed science. clarity of Lake Tahoe, and the IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Regional collaboration is multiple jurisdictions within the ®Yes achieved through the Upper Region for information exchange. Truckee River Watershed ®N/A Advisory Group which is made up of representatives of local, IWM3 - Increase public education and The Conservancy has owned awareness of watershed functions, C)Yes the property for the last eight protection and restoration needs to years. The project provides an ON/A opportunity to inform the public encourage stewardship by the public. about the sensitivity and IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. Dyes QN/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The designs of the project has .55 acre of water quality,water supply, ®Yes been guided by historic data wetlands will be groundwater recharge,flood ()N/A conditions and by current field restored and management) in local and regional conditions that reflect historic enhanced, and tannin efforts and support efforts geomorphic adjustments to decades of planning pp monitoring will to continue improving the science. disturbance- By renlicating the natural factors and human support science. IWM6 - Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in ®Yes order to improve coordination with ®N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: n/A Project Template Page 4 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community ❑N/A considerations. There has been collaboration with the Cultural Resource Staff of the Washoe b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. ❑✓ N/A c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. N/A No minority and low-income populations exceed 50 percent in El d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of N A climate change3 / The central estimate for temperature and precipitation changes indicate a e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas ❑N/A Relatively minor operation-related emissions (e.g.green technology). GHG emissions would be generated b f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are ❑✓ N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency OYes ®No Urban Water Use Efficiency ®Yes ©No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local ®Yes ()No System Reoperation ®Yes ®No Water Transfers ®Yes ®No Project Template Page 5 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater OYes ONO Desalination OYes ONO Precipitation Enhancement O O Recycled Municipal Water OYes ONO Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Oyes ONO Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and OYes ONO The project will reduce input of sediment Distribution and niitriantc to I aka Tnhna Which is n Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation OYes ONO Matching Water Quality to Use OYes ONO Pollution Prevention OYes ONO Project will reduce stream bank erosion Salt and Salinity Management Oyes ONO Urban Runoff Management OYes ONO The project will increase the capacity of Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship Oyes ONO Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and OYes ONO Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration OYes ONO This project will employ the Forest Management OYes ONO Land Use Planning and Management Oyes ONO Recharge Areas Protection OYes ONO In the vicinity of the Tahoe Pines Project Water-dependent Recreation OYes ONO Project improvements to water quality Watershed Management OYes ONO As the project is in the watershed it will Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management oyes ONO Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 6 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $916,000 $ 300,000.00 $1,216,000 OR ❑DAC 2. Annual Operations and $5,000 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? ®Yes Q No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $608,000 $2500 Construction activities would Phase 2 $608,000 $2500 The second phase may involve completion of the Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding State of California $916,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Bond Funds e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The current operation and maintenance activities in will be financed for the 25-year planning this project area are funded under the California period for project implementation (not grant Tahoe Conservancy's annual support budget. Once funded). this project has been completed, the post project f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, An engineers estimate for the project based on a 50% planning, bid, etc.) design was develo ed by the ro'ect design engineer. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? ®Yes QNo h.Please describe what impact there may be if If the Project is not funded it may not be constructed, the project is not funded. (300 words or less) 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 7 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and O Yes Development of the Tahoe Evaluation ❑ ONo Pines Restoration and 03/13 01/14 Public Access Project has O N/A proceeded through a b. Final Design OYes Nearing Completion 02/18 06/18 ❑ ONo O N/A c. Environmental Oyes Asa result of an extensive 01/13 07/14 Documentation ❑ ONo planning process action (CEQA/NEPA) alternatives were O N/A generated and were d. Permitting ®Yes Under way currently 01/18 06/18 ❑ ONo ®N/A e. Construction OYes Advertise for bids/Award 11/18 05/19 Contracting ❑ ONo Bid Q N/A f. Construction ®Yes Project construction Implementation ❑ ®No 08/19 10/19 N/A Provide explanation if more The project is in the process of working with the Department of General than one project stage is Services to complete the due diligence required by the Department of checked as current status Finance (DOF)and the last step in the preliminary plans phase of the project. DOF requires completion of due diligence before they will allow the project to go before the California Public Works Board (PWB)for Project Template Page 8 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed California Water Boards and Nevada project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Division of Environmental Protection. Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat 2007 (September).Lake Tahoe Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) TMDL Pollutant Reduction b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 2004. Wildlife feasibility of this project Inventory and MonitorinjZ in the Lake Tahoe Basin c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much In natural alluvial stream systems, the research has been conducted)of the proposed project in form and capacity of the active 300 words or less. channel are generally developed such d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. ©Yes Q No ©N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Restoration of natural filtering e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management ®Yes ®No ®N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? OYes ®No ®N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements OYes ®No ®N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", OYes ®No ON/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due OYes ®No ®N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior ®Yes ®No ®N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the ®Yes ©No ®N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the ®Yes ©No ©N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 9 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization California Tahoe Conservancy Name of Primary Contact Joe Pepi Name of Secondary Contact Stuart Roll Mailing Address 1061 Third Street, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail jpepi@tahoe.ca.gov Phone (###)###-#### (530) 543-6066 Other Cooperating US Bureau of Reclamation Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Tahoe Pines Campground Restoration and Public Access Project Category ❑✓ Water Supply/ ❑ ❑Restoration Wastewater Project Description The California Tahoe Conservancy(Conservancy), and (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Bureau of Reclamation(Reclamation), are pursuing the Upper words or less) Truckee River Tahoe Pines Campground Restoration and Public Access (Project) along the Upper Truckee River(UTR). The Project is identified in TRPA's Environmental Improvement Program(EIP) as a project that is necessary to restore and maintain environmental thresholds, including, water quality,recreation and wildlife habitat,for the Lake Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 2 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Project is part of the the Lake Tahoe EIP. Project is identified Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? in TRPA's Environmental Improvement Program(EIP), (EIP If so provide description. Prniect#01 0? 01 00051 nc a nmiect that is nece­nry to Political Support—List related MOUs, A Project TAC has been in place and the consists of agreements or TACs currently in place. representatives from local. state. and federal aaencies. Project Location: Latitude: 38 degrees 50' 52.1" N Longitude: -120 degrees 1' 36.63"W Project Location Description (e.g., along The Project is located along the Upper Truckee River near the south bank of stream/river Meyers California in El Dorado County. The study area for the between river miles or miles from project is generally bounded by U.S. Highway 50 on the north, Towns/intersection and/or address): South I Jnner Truckee Road on the west and State Highway 89 Project Template Page 1 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Tahoe TMDL identified .55 acres of standards in accordance with the QYes fine sediment as one of the wetlands will be attainment date, and participate in N/A major pollutant sources. This restored and the development of future TMDLs. ® project will help meet enhanced by this approved TMDL standards for Project. 200 linear ® Yes The Upper Truckee River was .55 acres of channelized and compacted by wetlands will be vehicles exposing it's stream restored and © N/A banks to increased erosive enhanced by this force and disconnecting it project. 200 linear from a portion of the it's feet of stream channel banks WQ3 - Implement water quality A monitoring plan is being monitoring programs through ©Yes developed for the project to planning horizon, and coordinate ®N/A characterize baseline annually throughout the Region. conditions,track project performance in relation to WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems ®Yes continues to meet Federal and State ®N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Restoration of the Tahoe Pines .55 acres of wetlands, riparian and upland areas ®Yes through channel modifications floodplain will be to re-establish natural water filtering will reduce bank erosion and restored and processes. ®N/A result in more frequent enhanced 0 l this inundation of the floodplain. Project. 200 linear WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable ®Yes collection,treatment and disposal of ®N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year QYes planning horizon. Q N/A Project Template Page 2 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably Oyes supply water. ON/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices ®Yes to meet state goals. ®N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor ®Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. (DN/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality ®Yes groundwater, and advocate for ®N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. ®Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural ON/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The restoration of riparian .55 acres of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and ®Yes areas and wetlands of the wetlands will be associated uplands to support healthy (:)N/ATahoe Pines Campground site restored and watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife is important for wildlife, projenhanced linear this because site restoration would feet o stream linear and plant habitats. feet of stream ER2 - Develop and implement This project requires ongoing 8.5 acres regularly programs to prevent the spread of ®Yes surveys of invasive species to surveyed for existing invasive species and ®N/A ensure no spread or invasive species. colonization of potential future colonization in these sensitive areas. invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, ®Yes activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. ®N/A Project Template Page 3 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts ®Yes Site supports significant levels .55 acre of caused by existing and new of biodiversity. This project wetlands will be development. ON/A has potential to replace habitat restored and lost elsewhere and maintain enhanced by this IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Past actions have created the water-related planning activities ®Yes need to restore river and within the planning horizon as ©N/A floodplain ecosystems in the supported by current and future Tahoe Basin to improve the watershed science. clarity of Lake Tahoe, and the IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Regional collaboration is multiple jurisdictions within the ®Yes achieved through the Upper Region for information exchange. Truckee River Watershed ®N/A Advisory Group which is made up of representatives of local, IWM3 - Increase public education and The Conservancy has owned awareness of watershed functions, C)Yes the property for the last eight protection and restoration needs to years. The project provides an ON/A opportunity to inform the public encourage stewardship by the public. about the sensitivity and IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. Dyes QN/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The designs of the project has .55 acre of water quality,water supply, ®Yes been guided by historic data wetlands will be groundwater recharge,flood ()N/A conditions and by current field restored and management) in local and regional conditions that reflect historic enhanced, and tannin efforts and support efforts geomorphic adjustments to decades of planning pp monitoring will to continue improving the science. disturbance- By renlicating the natural factors and human support science. IWM6 - Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in ®Yes order to improve coordination with ®N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: n/A Project Template Page 4 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community ❑N/A considerations. There has been collaboration with the Cultural Resource Staff of the Washoe b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. ❑✓ N/A c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. N/A No minority and low-income populations exceed 50 percent in El d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of N A climate change3 / The central estimate for temperature and precipitation changes indicate a e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas ❑N/A Relatively minor operation-related emissions (e.g.green technology). GHG emissions would be generated b f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are ❑✓ N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency OYes ®No Urban Water Use Efficiency ®Yes ©No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local ®Yes ()No System Reoperation ®Yes ®No Water Transfers ®Yes ®No Project Template Page 5 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater OYes ONO Desalination OYes ONO Precipitation Enhancement O O Recycled Municipal Water OYes ONO Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Oyes ONO Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and OYes ONO The project will reduce input of sediment Distribution and niitriantc to I aka Tnhna Which is n Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation OYes ONO Matching Water Quality to Use OYes ONO Pollution Prevention OYes ONO Project will reduce stream bank erosion Salt and Salinity Management Oyes ONO Urban Runoff Management OYes ONO The project will increase the capacity of Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship Oyes ONO Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and OYes ONO Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration OYes ONO This project will employ the Forest Management OYes ONO Land Use Planning and Management Oyes ONO Recharge Areas Protection OYes ONO In the vicinity of the Tahoe Pines Project Water-dependent Recreation OYes ONO Project improvements to water quality Watershed Management OYes ONO As the project is in the watershed it will Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management oyes ONO Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 6 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $916,000 $ 300,000.00 $1,216,000 OR ❑DAC 2. Annual Operations and $5,000 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? ®Yes Q No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $608,000 $2500 Construction activities would Phase 2 $608,000 $2500 The second phase may involve completion of the Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding State of California $916,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Bond Funds e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The current operation and maintenance activities in will be financed for the 25-year planning this project area are funded under the California period for project implementation (not grant Tahoe Conservancy's annual support budget. Once funded). this project has been completed, the post project f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, An engineers estimate for the project based on a 50% planning, bid, etc.) design was develo ed by the ro'ect design engineer. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? ®Yes QNo h.Please describe what impact there may be if If the Project is not funded it may not be constructed, the project is not funded. (300 words or less) 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 7 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and O Yes Development of the Tahoe Evaluation ❑ ONo Pines Restoration and 03/13 01/14 Public Access Project has O N/A proceeded through a b. Final Design OYes Nearing Completion 02/18 06/18 ❑ ONo O N/A c. Environmental Oyes Asa result of an extensive 01/13 07/14 Documentation ❑ ONo planning process action (CEQA/NEPA) alternatives were O N/A generated and were d. Permitting ®Yes Under way currently 01/18 06/18 ❑ ONo ®N/A e. Construction OYes Advertise for bids/Award 11/18 05/19 Contracting ❑ ONo Bid Q N/A f. Construction ®Yes Project construction Implementation ❑ ®No 08/19 10/19 N/A Provide explanation if more The project is in the process of working with the Department of General than one project stage is Services to complete the due diligence required by the Department of checked as current status Finance (DOF)and the last step in the preliminary plans phase of the project. DOF requires completion of due diligence before they will allow the project to go before the California Public Works Board (PWB)for Project Template Page 8 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed California Water Boards and Nevada project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Division of Environmental Protection. Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat 2007 (September).Lake Tahoe Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) TMDL Pollutant Reduction b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 2004. Wildlife feasibility of this project Inventory and MonitorinjZ in the Lake Tahoe Basin c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much In natural alluvial stream systems,the research has been conducted)of the proposed project in form and capacity of the active 300 words or less. channel are generally developed such d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. ®Yes Q No ©N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Restoration of natural filtering e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management ®Yes ®No ®N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? OYes ®No ®N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements OYes ®No ®N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", OYes ®No ON/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due OYes ®No ®N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior ®Yes ®No ®N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the ®Yes ©No ®N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the ®Yes ©No ©N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 9 of 9 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization El Dorado County Name of Primary Contact Daniel Kikkert Name of Secondary Contact Russell Wigart Mailing Address 924B Emerald Bay Road, South Lake Tahoe, CA. 96150 E-mail Dan.kikkert@edcgov.us; RusselLwigart@edcEov.us Phone (###)###-#### (530) 573-7914; (530) 573-7924 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC), United States Forest Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Service,Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA), Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWCQB) Is your agency/organization yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Country Club Stormwater Management and Erosion Control Project—Phase 3 Project Category 7 Water Supply/Wastewater F-0 Restoration F470 Storm Water/Flood Control ** Listed in SRP for SW/FC Project Description Urban development in the Country Club residential area has (Briefly describe the project, in 300 resulted in a concentrated flow of stormwater from the words or less) County of Eldorado (County) right-of-way(ROW) directed to pervious forested land as well into the Upper Truckee River. The hydrologic connectivity between Lake Tahoe and the Chiapa area results in high potential to deliver fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. Through this project the County proposes to construct erosion control improvements throughout the project area. Stormwater runoff will be directed to infiltration and capturing improvements providing a direct reduction in the transport of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. It is also anticipated that existing urban stormwater infrastructure will be upgraded to current design specifications by improving conveyance systems to allow for proper flow sizing and routing. The tributary watershed outfall of the Project area is in close proximity to the Upper Truckee River. This Project is also identified as in the TRPA Environmental Improvement Program (EIP) as Project #01.01.01.0021. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 of 7 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes; the project ties in directly with larger projects which Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? include: 1) Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program Tahoe Sierra IRWM If so provide description. and 2) Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load reduction efforts. In addition,the project components are related to local, regional, and state planning efforts to help improve water quality and restore the natural processes of the environment. Political Support—List related MOUs, 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 208 of the Clean agreements or TACs currently in place. Water Act,the TRPA prepared a Water Quality Management Plan (208 Plan) in 1978 for the Lake Tahoe Basin.The 208 Plan identifies erosion, runoff, and disturbance resulting from development such as subdivision roads as primary causes of the decline of Lake Tahoe's water quality.The 208 Plan also mandates that capital improvement projects such as this Project be implemented to bring all County roads into compliance with Best Management Practices (BMPs) by the year 2008. 2.The Lahontan RWCQB adopted a Basin Plan in the early 1980's that also mandated that BMPs be implemented within the Tahoe Basin to protect the water quality of Lake Tahoe and its tributaries. 3. In 1987,the CTC completed a report entitled "A Report on Soil Erosion Control Needs and Project in the Basin"that further identified specific project areas for BMP retrofit. 4. In 1992,TRPA and the County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding(MOU) related to completing various water quality and erosion control efforts within the County of El Dorado using the Department of Transportation Maintenance Division. 5. In 1997,TRPA developed a Basin-wide Environmental Improvement Program (EIP)that defined various projects in need of BMP/erosion control retrofits. 6. In 2007, Basin plan updates and TMDL effort. 7. In 2013,TRPA Regional Plan Update Project Location: Latitude: 38°52'10.703"N Longitude: 120°0'6.545"W Project Location Description (e.g.,along The project is near the area of Meyers, bounded by Highway the south bank of stream/river 50 to the west, Skyline Drive to the south and east, and CTC between river miles or miles from property to the north. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Project Template Page 2 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL Reduction in standards in accordance with the r Yes requires the reduction of Fine pounds of attainment date, and participate in Sediment Particles to Lake pollutants N/A the development of future TMDLs. Tahoe.This project meets that objective. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project will use LID, Volume of implementing measures such as W Yes stormwater runoff volume stormwater stormwater LID retrofits, erosion reduction and infiltration as captured and/or r N/A control/restoration to meet Water well as source control infiltrated Quality Objectives(WQOs)for practice to prevent erosion. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality The project will be fitted with #of storm events monitoring programs through F Yes a pressure transducer to for which data planning horizon, and coordinate r_ N/A monitor pre/post project are collected annually throughout the Region. stormwater runoff. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F-0 N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of Objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS3 - Implement and promote water This project will work with #of parcels conservation measures and practices %i Yes residents to reduce the need to meet state goals. r N/A for irrigation by promoting drought tolerant landscapes. GWM1 - Maintain and monitor F- Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. P N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Public outreach and protection activities for high quality r Yes Community watershed groundwater, and advocate for education is critical goal of N/A improvements to impacted this project groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural R N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies, wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy R N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement Preventing the spread and Count of noxious programs to prevent the spread of % Yes eradication of invasive weed populations existinginvasive species and species through vegetative p � N/A identified and colonization of potential future management and native removed. invasive species. plant selection will be encouraged through the project and public participation process. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Defensible space, wildfire #of parcels public and private landowners, J Yes prevention and compliance p p � p p � participating in activities to manage forest health and r N/A with applicable laws will be process. wildfire risks. encouraged through the project delivery and community engagement process. Includes coordination with the Tahoe Fire and Fuel Team (TFFT). Project Template Page 4 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV_ Yes This project has an element #of parcels. caused by existing and new to investigate and implement development. r N/A residential treatment BMPs for existing and new development sites. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The project will be working water-related planning activities FV Yes with the community to within the planning horizon as educate them on watershed N/A supported by current and future processes and also providing watershed science. feedback to the scientific community through monitoring and measurements. Sustainable methods, water efficiency, storm water harvesting will be encouraged through public outreach and participation. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project fits into a multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes regional program and utilizes Region for information exchange. collaboration and N/A information exchange among implementing agencies. IWM3 - Increase public education and This project includes an awareness of watershed functions, r Yes extensive community protection and restoration needs to outreach component to N/A encourage stewardship by the public. inform and educate the public of the need for BMP retrofit and encourage public participation through BMP implementation, rain water harvesting, recycling, nutrient management and responsible management practices IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes r N/A Project Template Page 5 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water harvesting for reuse, water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge groundwater recharge,flood through stormwater r N/A management) in local and regional infiltration, water quality planning efforts and support efforts improvements through to continue improving the science. restoration of stream zones and infiltration of runoff. Meteorological data will continued to be collected to understand the longterm trend in rainfall and runoff with water quality and runoff volume data recorded to understand benefits.All data will be collected and distributed to the scientific community as information is collected and compiled. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Provide for flow routing and flow climate change'. control, groundwater recharge to increase water supply. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Look to use green technology during emissions (e.g.green technology). construction to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the project. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Encourage xeriscaping and rain water not already mentioned elsewhere. harvesting for irrigation. Promote water reuse and discourage using local water supplies for irrigation. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F7 Yes F- No Water conservation programs help to increase urban water use efficiency Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes F470 No System Reoperation F- Yes F7 No Project Template Page 7 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F_ Yes FV_ No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater Fv- Yes F_ No groundwater recharge and restoring surface hydrology Desalination F_ Yes Fv- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes Fv- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F_ Yes Fv- No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes FY-0 No Pollution Prevention F40- Yes F_ No Decrease sediment and nutrient loading to the Upper Truckee River and Lake Tahoe Salt and Salinity Management F_ Yes P07 No Urban Runoff Management r Yes F_ No This project will improve water quality through infiltration, source control, restoration/upgrading of infrastructure.This project is a large fine sediment contributor to Lake Tahoe in El Dorado County and is expected to yield significant load reductions for the Tahoe TMDL. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes Fv-O No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes FvO_ No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F_ Yes Fv-O No Forest Management Fy-' Yes F No Will work with TFFT and private homeowners on defensible space and wild fire suppression Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F No Project will be coordinated with the County of El Dorado Stormwater Management Plan Recharge Areas Protection ry-' Yes F No If possible, stormwater infiltration basins will be incorporated into the design. These sites have potential to recharge the aquifer. Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes Fv-O No Watershed Management Fy-' Yes F_ No This project will implement sustainable solutions to implement Project Template Page 8 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? plans, programs and projects that support and enhance terrestrial life within its boundary.The project seeks to manage water quality, drainage and stormwater runoff Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes FV_ No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2017 Dollars) $330,000 $250,000(Federal) OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $7,500 $0 $7,500 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes W- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $250,000 $0 Planning and Design of Improvements Phase 2 $350,000 $7,500 Construction of Improvements Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project SNPLMA $257,000 cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding IRWM, PROP 1, LTRA $330,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. 2015,TRPA Mitigation Funds e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be provided will be financed for the 25-year planning by the County of El Dorado street maintenance period for project implementation (not grant division and the County Road fund funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual based on prior County projects of similar planning, bid,etc.) size and scope. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if If not funded this area will continue to produce the project is not funded. (300 words or less) elevated levels of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe reducing the opportunity to meet water quality objectives and compliance with the Tahoe TMDL. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation, Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F_ Yes This project is scheduled 1/2018 10/2018 Evaluation ❑x ❑X No to start planning activities in 2018 F N/A b. Final Design F Yes Development of Final 10/2018 6/2019 F E]No Plans, Contract Specifications, and F N/A Estimates c. Environmental F_ Yes Initial Study for Admin 6/2018 12/2018 Documentation F ONo Draft and Final CEQA (CEQA/NEPA) Documents. F N/A d. Permitting F_ Yes Obtaining TRPA permit, 10/2018 6/2019 F ❑x No Lahontan Permit, USFS Special Use Permit, and F N/A CTC License Agreements e. Construction F_ Yes Final BOS Approval of 9/2019 11/2019 Contracting F ❑X No Contract Documents, Advertisement, and F N/A Award of Contract f. Construction F Yes Construction of Project, 7/2020 10/2021 Implementation F [E]No post construction irrigation and monitoring F N/A effforts Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed County of El Dorado Stormwater project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Management Plan/Pollutant Load Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Reduction Plan, Lahontan Basin Plan, Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) TRPA Regional Plan, DWR Urban Water Management Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 1. County of El Dorado Stormwater feasibility of this project Management Plan Update (2013) 2. El Dorado County Pollutant Load Reduction Plan (2009) 3. El Dorado County Baseline Pollutant Load Estimate Report (2011) 4.Tahoe Sierra Stormwater Resource Plan (2018) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Pollutant Load Analysis is complete research has been conducted)of the proposed project in detailing modeled estimates. The 300 words or less. County is also collecting water quality and flow data downstream to identify sources and load reduction potentials. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID P-0 Yes F No F N/A techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The project will be following the concepts of LID in order to restore the hydrologic cycle to mimic pre development hydrology e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No r N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? x 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No r N/A x 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements 17- Yes 17- No r N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No r N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior 17- Yes 17- No r N/A Project Template Page 12 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the FF Yes F No W N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the ❑Yes ❑ No F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization El Dorado County Name of Primary Contact Daniel Kikkert Name of Secondary Contact Russell Wigart Mailing Address 924B Emerald Bay Road, South Lake Tahoe, CA. 96150 E-mail Dan.kikkert@edcgov.us; RusselLwigart@edcEov.us Phone (###)###-#### (530) 573-7914; (530) 573-7924 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC), United States Forest Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Service,Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA), Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWCQB) Is your agency/organization yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Country Club Stormwater Management and Erosion Control Project Project Category 7 Water Supply/Wastewater F-0 Restoration F470 Storm Water/Flood Control ** Listed in SRP for SW/FC Project Description Urban development in the Oflyng residential area has (Briefly describe the project, in 300 resulted in a concentrated flow of storm water from the words or less) County of El Dorado (County) right-of-way (ROW) directed to pervious forested land as well as the Upper Truckee River. The hydrologic connectivity between Lake Tahoe and the Oflyng area results in a high to moderate potential to deliver fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. This project proposes to provide Erosion Control Improvements to the project area. Infiltration improvements are proposed within the County ROW throughout the Project area. Storm water runoff from the Project will be directed into infiltration improvements providing a direct reduction in the transport of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. It is also anticipated that urban stormwater infrastructure will be upgraded to current design specifications with conveyance improved to allow for proper flow sizing/routing. The Project will complete/complement the previous series of erosion control and water quality project efforts within the area. The outfall points of the Project are in close proximity to the Upper Truckee River,which is connected via an ephemeral creek. Included within these areas are three Environmental Tahoe Sierra IRWM Improvement Program (EIP) projects, #189, #190, and #191 for Tahoe Paradise Meadowvale, Tahoe Paradise - Mandan, and Meyers Residential, respectively. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 7 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes; the project ties in directly with larger projects which Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? include: 1) Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program If so provide description. and 2) Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load reduction efforts. In addition,the project components are related to local, regional, and state planning efforts to help improve water quality and restore the natural processes of the environment. Political Support—List related MOUs, 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 208 of the Clean agreements or TACs currently in place. Water Act,the TRPA prepared a Water Quality Management Plan (208 Plan) in 1978 for the Lake Tahoe Basin.The 208 Plan identifies erosion, runoff, and disturbance resulting from development such as subdivision roads as primary causes of the decline of Lake Tahoe's water quality.The 208 Plan also mandates that capital improvement projects such as this Project be implemented to bring all County roads into compliance with Best Management Practices (BMPs) by the year 2008. 2.The Lahontan RWCQB adopted a Basin Plan in the early 1980's that also mandated that BMPs be implemented within the Tahoe Basin to protect the water quality of Lake Tahoe and its tributaries. 3. In 1987,the CTC completed a report entitled "A Report on Soil Erosion Control Needs and Project in the Basin"that further identified specific project areas for BMP retrofit. 4. In 1992,TRPA and the County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) related to completing various water quality and erosion control efforts within the County of El Dorado using the Department of Transportation Maintenance Division. S. In 1997,TRPA developed a Basin-wide Environmental Improvement Program (EIP)that defined various projects in need of BMP/erosion control retrofits. 6. In 2007, Basin plan updates and TMDL effort. 7. In 2013,TRPA Regional Plan Update Project Location: Latitude: 38°51'44.00"N Longitude: 120°0'28.00"W Project Template Page 2 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description (e.g.,along The Project is bordered by Southern Pines to the south, the south bank of stream/river Skyline Drive to the west, Pioneer Trail to the east, and between river miles or miles from subdivision limits to the north. The Project area Towns/intersection and/or address): encompasses County ROW, California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC), USFS, and privately owned property SLT, CA. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL Reduction in standards in accordance with the W Yes requires the reduction of Fine pounds of attainment date, and participate in r N/A Sediment Particles to Lake pollutants the development of future TMDLs. Tahoe.This project meets that objective. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project will use LID, Volume of implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater runoff volume stormwater stormwater LID retrofits, erosion reduction and infiltration as captured and/or � N/A control/restoration to meet Water well as source control infiltrated Quality Objectives(WQOs)for practice to prevent erosion. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality The project will be fitted with #of storm events monitoring programs through 1740 Yes a pressure transducer to for which data planning horizon, and coordinate F N/A monitor pre/post project are collected annually throughout the Region. stormwater runoff. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering I,' N/A processes. Project Template Page 3 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. R N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water This project will work with #of parcels conservation measures and practices r Yes residents to reduce the need to meet state goals. r N/A for irrigation by promoting drought tolerant landscapes. GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Public outreach and protection activities for high quality r Yes Community watershed groundwater, and advocate for education is critical goal of N/A improvements to impacted this project groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. Project Template Page 4 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement Preventing the spread and Count of noxious programs to prevent the spread of r Yes eradication of invasive weed populations existing invasive species and species through vegetative identified and N/A native d an nave colonization of potential future managementremoved. invasive species. plant selection will be encouraged through the project and public participation process. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Defensible space, wildfire #of parcels public and private landowners, P Yes prevention and compliance participating in activities to manage forest health and with applicable laws will be process. r N/A wildfire risks. encouraged through the project delivery and community engagement process. Includes coordination with the Tahoe Fire and Fuel Team (TFFT). ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts This project has an element #of parcels. caused by existing and new Yes to investigate and implement development. r_ N/A residential treatment BMPs for existing and new development sites. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The project will be working water-related planning activities r Yes with the community to within the planning horizon as educate them on watershed r N/A supported by current and future processes and also providing watershed science. feedback to the scientific community through monitoring and measurements. Sustainable methods, water efficiency, storm water harvesting will be encouraged through public outreach and participation. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project fits into a multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes regional program and utilizes Region for information exchange. collaboration and N/A information exchange among implementing agencies. Project Template Page 5 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and This project includes an awareness of watershed functions, r Yes extensive community protection and restoration needs to r N/A outreach component to encourage stewardship by the public. inform and educate the public of the need for BMP retrofit and encourage public participation through BMP implementation, rain water harvesting, recycling, nutrient management and responsible management practices IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes F7 N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water harvesting for reuse, water quality,water supply, Fv Yes groundwater recharge groundwater recharge,flood r N/A through stormwater management) in local and regional infiltration, water quality planning efforts and support efforts improvements through to continue improving the science. restoration of stream zones and infiltration of runoff. Meteorological data will continued to be collected to understand the longterm trend in rainfall and runoff with water quality and runoff volume data recorded to understand benefits.All data will be collected and distributed to the scientific community as information is collected and compiled. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 7 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Provide for flow routing and flow climate change'. control, groundwater recharge to increase water supply. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Look to use green technology during emissions (e.g.green technology). construction to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the project. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Encourage xeriscaping and rain water not already mentioned elsewhere. harvesting for irrigation. Promote water reuse and discourage using local water supplies for irrigation. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F7 Yes F- No Water conservation programs help to increase urban water use efficiency Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes F470 No System Reoperation F- Yes F7 No Project Template Page 8 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F_ Yes FV_ No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater Fv- Yes F_ No groundwater recharge and restoring surface hydrology Desalination F_ Yes Fv- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes Fv- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F_ Yes Fv- No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes FY-0 No Pollution Prevention F40- Yes F_ No Decrease sediment and nutrient loading to the Upper Truckee River and Lake Tahoe Salt and Salinity Management F_ Yes P07 No Urban Runoff Management r Yes F_ No This project will improve water quality through infiltration, source control, restoration/upgrading of infrastructure.This project is a large fine sediment contributor to Lake Tahoe in El Dorado County and is expected to yield significant load reductions for the Tahoe TMDL. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes Fv-O No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes FvO_ No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F_ Yes Fv-O No Forest Management Fy-' Yes F No Will work with TFFT and private homeowners on defensible space and wild fire suppression Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F No Project will be coordinated with the County of El Dorado Stormwater Management Plan Recharge Areas Protection ry-' Yes F No If possible, stormwater infiltration basins will be incorporated into the design. These sites have potential to recharge the aquifer. Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes Fv-O No Watershed Management Fy-' Yes F_ No This project will implement sustainable solutions to implement Project Template Page 9 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? plans, programs and projects that support and enhance terrestrial life within its boundary.The project seeks to manage water quality, drainage and stormwater runoff Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes FV_ No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 10 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2017 Dollars) $492,500 $250,000(Federal) $492,500 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $7,500 $0 $7,500 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes W- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $300,000 $0 Planning and Design of Improvements Phase 2 $492,500 $7,500 Construction of Improvements Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Prop 1,TRPA $300,000 cost Mitigation Funds d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding IRWM, PROP 1, LTRA $500,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. 2015,TRPA Mitigation Funds e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be provided will be financed for the 25-year planning by the County of El Dorado street maintenance period for project implementation (not grant division and the County Road fund funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual based on prior County projects of similar planning, bid,etc.) size and scope. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if If not funded this area will continue to produce the project is not funded. (300 words or less) elevated levels of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe reducing the opportunity to meet water quality objectives and compliance with the Tahoe TMDL. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 11 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F_ Yes This project is scheduled 1/2018 10/2018 Evaluation ❑x ❑X No to start planning activities in 2018 F N/A b. Final Design F Yes Development of Final 10/2018 6/2019 F E]No Plans, Contract Specifications, and F N/A Estimates c. Environmental F_ Yes Initial Study for Admin 6/2018 12/2018 Documentation F ONo Draft and Final CEQA (CEQA/NEPA) Documents. F N/A d. Permitting F_ Yes Obtaining TRPA permit, 10/2018 6/2019 F [E]No Lahontan Permit, USFS Special Use Permit, and F N/A CTC License Agreements e. Construction F_ Yes Final BOS Approval of 9/2019 11/2019 Contracting F ONo Contract Documents, Advertisement, and F N/A Award of Contract f. Construction F Yes Construction of Project, 7/2020 10/2021 Implementation F [E]No post construction irrigation and monitoring F N/A effforts Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 12 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed County of El Dorado Stormwater project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Management Plan/Pollutant Load Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Reduction Plan, Lahontan Basin Plan, Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) TRPA Regional Plan, DWR Urban Water Management Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 1. County of El Dorado Stormwater feasibility of this project Management Plan Update (2013) 2. El Dorado County Pollutant Load Reduction Plan (2009) 3. El Dorado County Baseline Pollutant Load Estimate Report (2011) 4.Tahoe Sierra Stormwater Resource Plan (2018) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Pollutant Load Analysis is complete research has been conducted) of the proposed project in detailing modeled estimates. The 300 words or less. County is also collecting water quality and flow data downstream to identify sources and load reduction potentials. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID P-0 Yes F No F N/A techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The project will be following the concepts of LID in order to restore the hydrologic cycle to mimic pre development hydrology e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No r N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? x 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No r N/A x 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements 17- Yes 17- No r N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No r N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior 17- Yes 17- No r N/A Project Template Page 13 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No r N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No r N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 14 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization El Dorado County Name of Primary Contact Daniel Kikkert Name of Secondary Contact Russell Wigart Mailing Address 924B Emerald Bay Road, South Lake Tahoe, CA. 96150 E-mail Dan.kikkert@edcgov.us; RusselLwigart@edcEov.us Phone (###)###-#### (530) 573-7914; (530) 573-7924 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC), United States Forest Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Service,Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA), Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWCQB) Is your agency/organization yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title South Upper Truckee Water Quality Project Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater FV_ Restoration F470 Storm Water/Flood Control ** Listed in SRP for SW/FC Project Description Urban development in the South Upper Truckee residential (Briefly describe the project, in 300 area has resulted in a concentrated flow of stormwater from words or less) the County of Eldorado (County) right-of-way (ROW) directed into the Upper Truckee River. The hydrologic connectivity between Lake Tahoe and the South Upper Truckee area results in high potential to deliver fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. Through this project the County proposes to construct erosion control improvements throughout the project area. Stormwater runoff will be directed to infiltration and capturing improvements providing a direct reduction in the transport of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. It is also anticipated that existing urban stormwater infrastructure will be upgraded to current design specifications by improving conveyance systems to allow for proper flow sizing and routing. The tributary watershed outfall of the Project area is in close proximity to the Upper Truckee River. This Project is also identified as in the TRPA Environmental Improvement Program (EIP) as Project#709. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 of 7 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes; the project ties in directly with larger projects which Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? include: 1) Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program If so provide description. and 2) Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load reduction efforts. In addition,the project components are related to Tahoe Sierra IRWM local, regional, and state planning efforts to help improve water quality and restore the natural processes of the environment. Political Support—List related MOUs, 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 208 of the Clean agreements or TACs currently in place. Water Act,the TRPA prepared a Water Quality Management Plan (208 Plan) in 1978 for the Lake Tahoe Basin.The 208 Plan identifies erosion, runoff, and disturbance resulting from development such as subdivision roads as primary causes of the decline of Lake Tahoe's water quality.The 208 Plan also mandates that capital improvement projects such as this Project be implemented to bring all County roads into compliance with Best Management Practices (BMPs) by the year 2008. 2.The Lahontan RWCQB adopted a Basin Plan in the early 1980's that also mandated that BMPs be implemented within the Tahoe Basin to protect the water quality of Lake Tahoe and its tributaries. 3. In 1987,the CTC completed a report entitled "A Report on Soil Erosion Control Needs and Project in the Basin"that further identified specific project areas for BMP retrofit. 4. In 1992,TRPA and the County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) related to completing various water quality and erosion control efforts within the County of El Dorado using the Department of Transportation Maintenance Division. 5. In 1997,TRPA developed a Basin-wide Environmental Improvement Program (EIP)that defined various projects in need of BMP/erosion control retrofits. 6. In 2007, Basin plan updates and TMDL effort. 7. In 2013,TRPA Regional Plan Update Project Location: Latitude: 38°50'15.878"N Longitude: 120°1'32.312"W Project Location Description (e.g.,along The project is near the area of Meyers, bounded by Highway the south bank of stream/river 50 to the north,the Upper Truckee River to the east, and between river miles or miles from USFS property to the south and west. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Project Template Page 2 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL Reduction in standards in accordance with the r Yes requires the reduction of Fine pounds of attainment date, and participate in Sediment Particles to Lake pollutants N/A the development of future TMDLs. Tahoe.This project meets that objective. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project will use LID, Volume of implementing measures such as W Yes stormwater runoff volume stormwater stormwater LID retrofits, erosion reduction and infiltration as captured and/or r N/A control/restoration to meet Water well as source control infiltrated Quality Objectives(WQOs)for practice to prevent erosion. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality The project will be fitted with #of storm events monitoring programs through F Yes a pressure transducer to for which data planning horizon, and coordinate r_ N/A monitor pre/post project are collected annually throughout the Region. stormwater runoff. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F-0 N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of Objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS3 - Implement and promote water This project will work with #of parcels conservation measures and practices %i Yes residents to reduce the need to meet state goals. r N/A for irrigation by promoting drought tolerant landscapes. GWM1 - Maintain and monitor F- Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. P N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Public outreach and protection activities for high quality r Yes Community watershed groundwater, and advocate for education is critical goal of N/A improvements to impacted this project groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural R N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies, wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy R N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement Preventing the spread and Count of noxious programs to prevent the spread of % Yes eradication of invasive weed populations existinginvasive species and species through vegetative p � N/A identified and colonization of potential future management and native removed. invasive species. plant selection will be encouraged through the project and public participation process. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Defensible space, wildfire #of parcels public and private landowners, J Yes prevention and compliance p p � p p � participating in activities to manage forest health and r N/A with applicable laws will be process. wildfire risks. encouraged through the project delivery and community engagement process. Includes coordination with the Tahoe Fire and Fuel Team (TFFT). Project Template Page 4 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV_ Yes This project has an element #of parcels. caused by existing and new to investigate and implement development. r N/A residential treatment BMPs for existing and new development sites. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The project will be working water-related planning activities FV Yes with the community to within the planning horizon as educate them on watershed N/A supported by current and future processes and also providing watershed science. feedback to the scientific community through monitoring and measurements. Sustainable methods, water efficiency, storm water harvesting will be encouraged through public outreach and participation. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project fits into a multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes regional program and utilizes Region for information exchange. collaboration and N/A information exchange among implementing agencies. IWM3 - Increase public education and This project includes an awareness of watershed functions, r Yes extensive community protection and restoration needs to r N/A outreach component to encourage stewardship by the public. inform and educate the public of the need for BMP retrofit and encourage public participation through BMP implementation, rain water harvesting, recycling, nutrient management and responsible management practices IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes r N/A Project Template Page 5 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water harvesting for reuse, water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge groundwater recharge,flood through stormwater r N/A management) in local and regional infiltration, water quality planning efforts and support efforts improvements through to continue improving the science. restoration of stream zones and infiltration of runoff. Meteorological data will continued to be collected to understand the longterm trend in rainfall and runoff with water quality and runoff volume data recorded to understand benefits.All data will be collected and distributed to the scientific community as information is collected and compiled. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Provide for flow routing and flow climate change'. control, groundwater recharge to increase water supply. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Look to use green technology during emissions (e.g.green technology). construction to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the project. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Encourage xeriscaping and rain water not already mentioned elsewhere. harvesting for irrigation. Promote water reuse and discourage using local water supplies for irrigation. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F7 Yes F- No Water conservation programs help to increase urban water use efficiency Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes F470 No System Reoperation F- Yes F7 No Project Template Page 7 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F_ Yes FV_ No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater Fv- Yes F_ No groundwater recharge and restoring surface hydrology Desalination F_ Yes Fv- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes Fv- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F_ Yes Fv- No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes FY-0 No Pollution Prevention F40- Yes F_ No Decrease sediment and nutrient loading to the Upper Truckee River and Lake Tahoe Salt and Salinity Management F_ Yes P07 No Urban Runoff Management r Yes F_ No This project will improve water quality through infiltration, source control, restoration/upgrading of infrastructure.This project is a large fine sediment contributor to Lake Tahoe in El Dorado County and is expected to yield significant load reductions for the Tahoe TMDL. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes Fv-O No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes FvO_ No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F_ Yes Fv-O No Forest Management Fy-' Yes F No Will work with TFFT and private homeowners on defensible space and wild fire suppression Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F No Project will be coordinated with the County of El Dorado Stormwater Management Plan Recharge Areas Protection ry-' Yes F No If possible, stormwater infiltration basins will be incorporated into the design. These sites have potential to recharge the aquifer. Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes Fv-O No Watershed Management Fy-' Yes F_ No This project will implement sustainable solutions to implement Project Template Page 8 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? plans, programs and projects that support and enhance terrestrial life within its boundary.The project seeks to manage water quality, drainage and stormwater runoff Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management FV_ Yes F_ No Improvements will be designed to reduce the impact of flooding within the Unit 60 subdivision, which is within the Project area. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2019 Dollars) $250,000 $50,000 $300,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $7,500 $0 $7,500 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $250,000 $0 Planning and Design of Improvements Phase 2 $500,000 $7,500 Construction of Improvements Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project - $0 cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding IRWM, PROP 1, LTRA $750,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. 2015,TRPA Mitigation Funds e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be provided will be financed for the 25-year planning by the County of El Dorado street maintenance period for project implementation (not grant division and the County Road fund funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual based on prior County projects of similar planning, bid,etc.) size and scope. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if If not funded this area will continue to produce the project is not funded. (300 words or less) elevated levels of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe reducing the opportunity to meet water quality objectives and compliance with the Tahoe TMDL. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F_ Yes This project is scheduled 1/2019 10/2019 Evaluation ❑x ❑X No to start planning activities in 2019 F N/A b. Final Design F Yes Development of Final 10/2020 3/2020 F ONo Plans, Contract Specifications, and F N/A Estimates c. Environmental F Yes Initial Study for Admin 6/2020 12/2020 Documentation F ❑x No Draft and Final CEQA (CEQA/NEPA) Documents. F N/A d. Permitting F Yes Obtaining TRPA permit, 10/2020 1/2021 F ❑x No Lahontan Permit, USFS Special Use Permit, and F N/A CTC License Agreements e. Construction F Yes Final BOS Approval of 3/2021 7/2021 Contracting F ❑x No Contract Documents, Advertisement, and F N/A Award of Contract f. Construction F Yes Construction of Project, 7/2021 10/2023 Implementation F ❑x No post construction irrigation and monitoring F N/A effforts Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed County of El Dorado Stormwater project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Management Plan/Pollutant Load Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Reduction Plan, Lahontan Basin Plan, Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) TRPA Regional Plan, DWR Urban Water Management Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 1. County of El Dorado Stormwater feasibility of this project Management Plan Update (2013) 2. El Dorado County Pollutant Load Reduction Plan (2009) 3. El Dorado County Baseline Pollutant Load Estimate Report (2011) 4.Tahoe Sierra Stormwater Resource Plan (2018) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Pollutant Load Analysis is complete research has been conducted) of the proposed project in detailing modeled estimates. 300 words or less. Modeling results indicate construction of this project will have net benefit on water quality. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID P Yes F No F N/A techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The project will be following the concepts of LID in order to restore the hydrologic cycle to mimic pre development hydrology e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No r N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? x 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No r N/A x 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No r N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No r N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due l— Yes F No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No I%' N/A Project Template Page 12 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No r N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No r N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization El Dorado County Name of Primary Contact Daniel Kikkert Name of Secondary Contact Russell Wigart Mailing Address 924B Emerald Bay Road, South Lake Tahoe, CA. 96150 E-mail Dan.kikkert@edcgov.us; RusselLwigart@edcEov.us Phone (###)###-#### (530) 573-7914; (530) 573-7924 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC), United States Forest Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Service,Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA), Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWCQB) Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title San Berardino Water Quality Project Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater FV_ Restoration F470 Storm Water/Flood Control ** Listed in SRP for SW/FC Project Description Urban development in the San Bernardino Ave residential (Briefly describe the project, in 300 area has resulted in a concentrated flow of stormwater from words or less) the County of Eldorado (County) right-of-way (ROW) directed to pervious forested land as well into the Upper Truckee River. The hydrologic connectivity between Lake Tahoe and the San Bernardino area results in high potential to deliver fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. Through this project the County proposes to construct erosion control improvements throughout the project area. Stormwater runoff will be directed to infiltration and capturing improvements providing a direct reduction in the transport of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. It is also anticipated that existing urban stormwater infrastructure will be upgraded to current design specifications by improving conveyance systems to allow for proper flow sizing and routing. The tributary watershed outfall of the Project area is in close proximity to the Upper Truckee River. This Project is also identified as in the TRPA Environmental Improvement Program (EIP) as Project#194. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 4 of 7 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes; the project ties in directly with larger projects which Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? include: 1) Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program If so provide description. and 2) Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load reduction Tahoe Sierra IRWM efforts. In addition,the project components are related to local, regional, and state planning efforts to help improve water quality and restore the natural processes of the environment. Political Support—List related MOUs, 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 208 of the Clean agreements or TACs currently in place. Water Act,the TRPA prepared a Water Quality Management Plan (208 Plan) in 1978 for the Lake Tahoe Basin.The 208 Plan identifies erosion, runoff, and disturbance resulting from development such as subdivision roads as primary causes of the decline of Lake Tahoe's water quality.The 208 Plan also mandates that capital improvement projects such as this Project be implemented to bring all County roads into compliance with Best Management Practices (BMPs) by the year 2008. 2.The Lahontan RWCQB adopted a Basin Plan in the early 1980's that also mandated that BMPs be implemented within the Tahoe Basin to protect the water quality of Lake Tahoe and its tributaries. 3. In 1987,the CTC completed a report entitled "A Report on Soil Erosion Control Needs and Project in the Basin"that further identified specific project areas for BMP retrofit. 4. In 1992,TRPA and the County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) related to completing various water quality and erosion control efforts within the County of El Dorado using the Department of Transportation Maintenance Division. 5. In 1997,TRPA developed a Basin-wide Environmental Improvement Program (EIP)that defined various projects in need of BMP/erosion control retrofits. 6. In 2007, Basin plan updates and TMDL effort. 7. In 2013,TRPA Regional Plan Update Project Location: Latitude: 38°51'24.581"N Longitude: 120°1'56.294"W Project Location Description (e.g.,along The project is near the area of Meyers, bounded by Highway the south bank of stream/river 50 to the south, Upper Truckee River to the east, North between river miles or miles from Upper Truckee Road to the west, and Normuk Street to the Towns/intersection and/or address): North. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Project Template Page 2 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL Reduction in standards in accordance with the r Yes requires the reduction of Fine pounds of attainment date, and participate in Sediment Particles to Lake pollutants N/A the development of future TMDLs. Tahoe.This project meets that objective. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project will use LID, Volume of implementing measures such as W Yes stormwater runoff volume stormwater stormwater LID retrofits, erosion reduction and infiltration as captured and/or r N/A control/restoration to meet Water well as source control infiltrated Quality Objectives(WQOs)for practice to prevent erosion. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality The project will be fitted with #of storm events monitoring programs through F Yes a pressure transducer to for which data planning horizon, and coordinate r_ N/A monitor pre/post project are collected annually throughout the Region. stormwater runoff. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F-0 N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS3 - Implement and promote water This project will work with #of parcels conservation measures and practices r Yes residents to reduce the need to meet state goals. r N/A for irrigation by promoting drought tolerant landscapes. GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. P N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Public outreach and protection activities for high quality r Yes Community watershed groundwater, and advocate for education is critical goal of N/A improvements to impacted this project groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy W N/A watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement Preventing the spread and Count of noxious programs to prevent the spread of r Yes eradication of invasive weed populations existing invasive species and r N/A species through vegetative identified and colonization of potential future management and native removed. invasive species. plant selection will be encouraged through the project and public participation process. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Defensible space, wildfire #of parcels public and private landowners, FV Yes prevention and compliance participating in activities to manage forest health and r N/A with applicable laws will be process. wildfire risks. encouraged through the project delivery and community engagement process. Includes coordination with the Tahoe Fire and Fuel Team (TFFT). Project Template Page 4 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV_ Yes This project has an element #of parcels. caused by existing and new to investigate and implement development. r N/A residential treatment BMPs for existing and new development sites. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The project will be working water-related planning activities FV Yes with the community to within the planning horizon as educate them on watershed N/A supported by current and future processes and also providing watershed science. feedback to the scientific community through monitoring and measurements. Sustainable methods, water efficiency, storm water harvesting will be encouraged through public outreach and participation. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project fits into a multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes regional program and utilizes Region for information exchange. collaboration and N/A information exchange among implementing agencies. IWM3 - Increase public education and This project includes an awareness of watershed functions, r Yes extensive community protection and restoration needs to r N/A outreach component to encourage stewardship by the public. inform and educate the public of the need for BMP retrofit and encourage public participation through BMP implementation, rain water harvesting, recycling, nutrient management and responsible management practices IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes r N/A Project Template Page 5 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water harvesting for reuse, water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge groundwater recharge,flood through stormwater r N/A management) in local and regional infiltration, water quality planning efforts and support efforts improvements through to continue improving the science. restoration of stream zones and infiltration of runoff. Meteorological data will continued to be collected to understand the longterm trend in rainfall and runoff with water quality and runoff volume data recorded to understand benefits.All data will be collected and distributed to the scientific community as information is collected and compiled. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Provide for flow routing and flow climate change'. control, groundwater recharge to increase water supply. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Look to use green technology during emissions (e.g.green technology). construction to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the project. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Encourage xeriscaping and rain water not already mentioned elsewhere. harvesting for irrigation. Promote water reuse and discourage using local water supplies for irrigation. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F7 Yes F- No Water conservation programs help to increase urban water use efficiency Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes F470 No System Reoperation F- Yes F7 No Project Template Page 7 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F_ Yes FV_ No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater Fv- Yes F_ No groundwater recharge and restoring surface hydrology Desalination F_ Yes Fv- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes Fv- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F_ Yes Fv- No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes FY-0 No Pollution Prevention F40- Yes F_ No Decrease sediment and nutrient loading to the Upper Truckee River and Lake Tahoe Salt and Salinity Management F_ Yes P07 No Urban Runoff Management r Yes F_ No This project will improve water quality through infiltration, source control, restoration/upgrading of infrastructure.This project is a large fine sediment contributor to Lake Tahoe in El Dorado County and is expected to yield significant load reductions for the Tahoe TMDL. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes Fv-O No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes FvO_ No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F_ Yes Fv-O No Forest Management Fy-' Yes F No Will work with TFFT and private homeowners on defensible space and wild fire suppression Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F No Project will be coordinated with the County of El Dorado Stormwater Management Plan Recharge Areas Protection ry-' Yes F No If possible, stormwater infiltration basins will be incorporated into the design. These sites have potential to recharge the aquifer. Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes Fv-O No Watershed Management Fy-' Yes F_ No This project will implement sustainable solutions to implement Project Template Page 8 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? plans, programs and projects that support and enhance terrestrial life within its boundary.The project seeks to manage water quality, drainage and stormwater runoff Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes FV_ No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2018 Dollars) $250,000 $0 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $7,500 $0 $7,500 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $350,000 $0 Planning and Design of Improvements Phase 2 $650,000 $7,500 Construction of Improvements Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project - $0 cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding IRWM, PROP 1, LTRA $1,000,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. 2015 e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be provided will be financed for the 25-year planning by the County of El Dorado street maintenance period for project implementation (not grant division and the County Road fund funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Conceptual based on prior County projects of similar planning, bid,etc.) size and scope. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if If not funded this area will continue to produce the project is not funded. (300 words or less) elevated levels of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe reducing the opportunity to meet water quality objectives and compliance with the Tahoe TMDL. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes This project is scheduled 1/2019 10/2019 Evaluation ❑x ❑x No to start planning activities in 2019 F N/A b. Final Design F Yes Development of Final 10/2019 3/2020 F ONo Plans, Contract Specifications, and F_ N/A Estimates c. Environmental F Yes Initial Study for Admin 6/2019 12/2019 Documentation F ❑x No Draft and Final CEQA (CEQA/NEPA) Documents. F_ N/A d. Permitting F_ Yes Obtaining TRPA permit, 10/2019 1/2020 F ❑x No Lahontan Permit, USFS Special Use Permit, and F_ N/A CTC License Agreements e. Construction F_ Yes Final BOS Approval of 3/2020 7/2020 Contracting F ❑x No Contract Documents, Advertisement, and N/A Award of Contract f. Construction Yes Construction of Project, 7/2020 10/2021 Implementation F ❑x No post construction irrigation and monitoring F N/A effforts Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed County of El Dorado Stormwater project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Management Plan/Pollutant Load Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Reduction Plan, Lahontan Basin Plan, Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) TRPA Regional Plan, DWR Urban Water Management Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 1. County of El Dorado Stormwater feasibility of this project Management Plan Update (2013) 2. El Dorado County Pollutant Load Reduction Plan (2009) 3. El Dorado County Baseline Pollutant Load Estimate Report (2011) 4.Tahoe Sierra Stormwater Resource Plan (2018) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Pollutant Load Analysis is complete research has been conducted) of the proposed project in detailing modeled estimates. 300 words or less. Modeling results indicate construction of this project will have net benefit on water quality. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID P Yes F No F N/A techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The project will be following the concepts of LID in order to restore the hydrologic cycle to mimic pre development hydrology e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management XF Yes F No r N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? XF Yes F No r N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No r N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No r N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due l— Yes F No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No I%' N/A Project Template Page 12 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No r N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No r N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization El Dorado County Name of Primary Contact Daniel Kikkert Name of Secondary Contact Russell Wigart Mailing Address 924B Emerald Bay Road, South Lake Tahoe, CA. 96150 E-mail Dan.kikkert@edcgov.us; RusselLwigart@edcEov.us Phone (###)###-#### (530) 573-7914; (530) 573-7924 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC), United States Forest Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Service,Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA), Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWCQB) Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Meyers SEZ and Erosion Control Project— Phase 2 Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater FV_ Restoration F470 Storm Water/Flood Control ** Listed in SRP for SW/FC Project Description Urban development in the Meyers residential area has (Briefly describe the project, in 300 resulted in a concentrated flow of storm water from the words or less) County of El Dorado (County) right-of-way (ROW) directed to pervious forested land as well as to the Upper Truckee River. The hydrologic connectivity between Lake Tahoe and the Meyers area results in a high to moderate potential to deliver fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. Also, within this project area, a critical large Stream Environment Zone (SEZ) meadow system was modified in the early 1960's which disconnected the meadow system from the historic Meyers Creek. A critical phase of this project will be to reconnect this creek with its historic floodplain allowing for natural filtration of storm water runoff allowing for a reduction in both pollutant concentration and volume to downstream areas. This project proposes to provide both Erosion Control and SEZ components for restoration. Infiltration improvements are proposed within the County ROW throughout the Project area as well as restoring wetland connectivity. Storm water runoff from the Project will be directed into infiltration improvements providing a direct reduction in the transport of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. It is also anticipated that urban stormwater infrastructure will be upgraded to current design specifications with conveyance improved to allow for proper flow sizing/ routing. The Project will complete/complement the previous series of Tahoe Sierra IRWM erosion control and water quality project efforts within the area. The outfall points of the Project are in close proximity to the Upper Truckee River,which is connected via an ephemeral creek. Included within these areas are three Environmental Improvement Program (EIP) projects, #189, #190, and #191 for Tahoe Paradise Meadowvale, Tahoe Paradise - Mandan, and Meyers Residential, respectively. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 5 of 7 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes; the project ties in directly with larger projects which Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? include: 1) Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program If so provide description. and 2) Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load reduction efforts. In addition,the project components are related to local, regional, and state planning efforts to help improve water quality and restore the natural processes of the environment. Political Support—List related MOUs, 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 208 of the Clean agreements or TACs currently in place. Water Act,the TRPA prepared a Water Quality Management Plan (208 Plan) in 1978 for the Lake Tahoe Basin.The 208 Plan identifies erosion, runoff, and disturbance resulting from development such as subdivision roads as primary causes of the decline of Lake Tahoe's water quality.The 208 Plan also mandates that capital improvement projects such as this Project be implemented to bring all County roads into compliance with Best Management Practices (BMPs) by the year 2008. 2.The Lahontan RWCQB adopted a Basin Plan in the early 1980's that also mandated that BMPs be implemented within the Tahoe Basin to protect the water quality of Lake Tahoe and its tributaries. 3. In 1987,the CTC completed a report entitled "A Report on Soil Erosion Control Needs and Project in the Basin"that further identified specific project areas for BMP retrofit. 4. In 1992,TRPA and the County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding(MOU) related to completing various water quality and erosion control efforts within the County of El Dorado using the Department of Transportation Maintenance Division. 5. In 1997,TRPA developed a Basin-wide Environmental Improvement Program (EIP) that defined various projects in need of BMP/erosion control retrofits. 6. In 2007, Basin plan updates and TMDL effort. 7. In 2013,TRPA Regional Plan Update Project Location: Project Template Page 2 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Latitude: 38°51' 26.5" N Longitude: 120°00'46.2"W Project Location Description (e.g.,along The Project is bordered by U.S. Highway 50/State Route 89 the south bank of stream/river (US50/SR89)to the south and northeast, Santa Fe Road to between river miles or miles from the east, and subdivision limits to the north and west. The Towns/intersection and/or address): Project area encompasses County ROW, CTC, USFS, and privately owned property SLT, CA. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL Reduction in standards in accordance with the W Yes requires the reduction of Fine pounds of attainment date, and participate in r N/A Sediment Particles to Lake pollutants the development of future TMDLs. Tahoe.This project meets that objective. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project will use LID, Volume of implementing measures such as P Yes stormwater runoff volume stormwater stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A reduction and infiltration as captured and/or control/restoration to meet Water well as source control infiltrated Quality Objectives(WQOs)for practice to prevent erosion. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality This project currently has a #of storm events monitoring programs through F40 Yes water quality monitoring for which data planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A component to measure flow are collected annually throughout the Region. and concentration of pollutants and pollutant loads. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State I~'- N/A standards. Project Template Page 3 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, A phase of this project wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes involves the restoration and to re-establish natural water filtering large meadow system and re- processes. N/A connection of the floodplain to its surface water(Meyers Creek). WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. FV N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water This project will work with conservation measures and practices r Yes South Tahoe Public Utility to meet state goals. District to reduce the need N/A for irrigation of landscaping and provide for water recycling through storage and reuse. GWM1- Maintain and monitor Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Public outreach and protection activities for high quality r Yes Community watershed groundwater, and advocate for education is critical goal of r N/A improvements to impacted this project groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 4 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water The restoration of Meyers bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes Creek to a historic and associated uplands to support healthy r N/A disconnected flooplain will watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife meet all the goals of ER1. and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement Preventing the spread and Count of noxious programs to prevent the spread of FV Yes eradication of invasive weed populations existing invasive species and r N/A species through vegetative identified and colonization of potential future management and native removed. invasive species. plant selection will be encouraged through the project and public participation process. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Defensible space, wildfire #of parcels public and private landowners, P Yes prevention and compliance participating in activities to manage forest health and r N/A with applicable laws will be process. wildfire risks. encouraged through the project delivery and community engagement process. Includes coordination with the Tahoe Fire and Fuel Team (TFFT). ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Fy-' Yes This project has an element #of parcels. caused by existing and new to investigate and implement development. r N/A residential treatment BMPs for existing and new development sites. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The project will be working water-related planning activities r Yes with the community to within the planning horizon as educate them on watershed N/A supported by current and future processes and also providing watershed science. feedback to the scientific community through monitoring and measurements. Sustainable methods, water efficiency, storm water harvesting will be encouraged through public outreach and participation. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project fits into a multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes regional program and utilizes Region for information exchange. collaboration and N/A information exchange among implementing agencies. Project Template Page 5 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and This project includes an awareness of watershed functions, r Yes extensive community protection and restoration needs to r N/A outreach component to encourage stewardship by the public. inform and educate the public of the need for BMP retrofit and encourage public participation through BMP implementation, rain water harvesting, recycling, nutrient management and responsible management practices IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes F7 N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water harvesting for reuse, water quality,water supply, Fv Yes groundwater recharge groundwater recharge,flood r N/A through stormwater management) in local and regional infiltration, water quality planning efforts and support efforts improvements through to continue improving the science. restoration of stream zones and infiltration of runoff. Meteorological data will continued to be collected to understand the longterm trend in rainfall and runoff with water quality and runoff volume data recorded to understand benefits.All data will be collected and distributed to the scientific community as information is collected and compiled. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 7 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Provide for flow routing and flow climate change'. control, groundwater recharge to increase water supply. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Look to use green technology during emissions(e.g.green technology). construction to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the project. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Encourage xeriscaping and rain water not already mentioned elsewhere. harvesting for irrigation. Promote water reuse and discourage using local water supplies for irrigation. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F7 Yes F- No Water conservation programs help to increase urban water use efficiency Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes F470 No System Reoperation F- Yes F7 No Project Template Page 8 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F- Yes FV- No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater Fv- Yes F- No groundwater recharge and restoring surface hydrology Desalination F- Yes Fv- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F- Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F- Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F- Yes Fv- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F- Yes Fv- No Matching Water Quality to Use F- Yes Fy-0 No Pollution Prevention F40- Yes F- No Decrease sediment and nutrient loading to the Upper Truckee River and Lake Tahoe Salt and Salinity Management F- Yes P07 No Urban Runoff Management r Yes F- No This project will improve water quality through infiltration, source control, restoration/upgrading of infrastructure.This project is a large fine sediment contributor to Lake Tahoe in El Dorado County and is expected to yield significant load reductions for the Tahoe TMDL. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes Fv-O No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F- Yes FvO- No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration FvO- Yes F- No This project includes the restoration of several acres of active floodplain and meadow. The anticipated benefits include vegetation, wildlife, invertebrates,water foul and water quality. Forest Management W Yes F- No Will work with TFFT and private homeowners on defensible space and wild fire suppression Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F- No Project will be coordinated with the County of El Dorado Stormwater Management Plan Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F- No If possible, stormwater infiltration basins will be incorporated into the design. These sites have potential to Project Template Page 9 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? recharge the aquifer. Water-dependent Recreation FV_ Yes No This project area has a golfcourse and small recreation water body located within the project boundary. Watershed Management r Yes F_ No This project will implement sustainable solutions to implement plans, programs and projects that support and enhance terrestrial life within its boundary.The project seeks to manage water quality, drainage and stormwater runoff Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management Yes V No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 10 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2019 Dollars) $550,000 $0 $550,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $15,000 $0 $15,000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 - - Construction of Phase 1 improvements complete Phase 2 $500,000 $15,000 Construction of Improvements for Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project - Zero for $0 cost Phase 2 d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding IRWM, PROP 1, LTRA $500,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. 2017,TRPA Mitigation Funds e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be provided will be financed for the 25-year planning by the County of El Dorado street maintenance period for project implementation (not grant division and the County Road fund funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual based on prior County projects of similar planning, bid,etc.) size and scope. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if If not funded this area will continue to produce the project is not funded. (300 words or less) elevated levels of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe reducing the opportunity to meet water quality objectives and compliance with the Tahoe TMDL. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 11 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes This project is scheduled 1/2019 10/2019 Evaluation ❑x ❑x No to start planning activities in 2020 F N/A b. Final Design F Yes Development of Final 10/2019 3/2020 F ❑X No Plans, Contract Specifications, and F N/A Estimates c. Environmental F Yes Initial Study for Admin 6/2019 12/2019 Documentation F ❑x No Draft and Final CEQA (CEQA/NEPA) Documents. F N/A d. Permitting F- Yes Obtaining TRPA permit, 10/2019 1/2020 F ❑x No Lahontan Permit, USFS Special Use Permit, and F N/A CTC License Agreements e. Construction F Yes Final BOS Approval of 3/2020 7/2020 Contracting F ❑x No Contract Documents, Advertisement, and F N/A Award of Contract f. Construction F Yes Construction of Project, 7/2020 10/2022 Implementation F ❑x No post construction irrigation and monitoring F N/A effforts Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 12 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed County of El Dorado Stormwater project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Management Plan/Pollutant Load Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Reduction Plan, Lahontan Basin Plan, Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) TRPA Regional Plan, DWR Urban Water Management Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 1. County of El Dorado Stormwater feasibility of this project Management Plan Update (2013) 2. El Dorado County Pollutant Load Reduction Plan (2009) 3. El Dorado County Baseline Pollutant Load Estimate Report (2011) 4.Tahoe Sierra Stormwater Resource Plan (2018) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Pollutant Load Analysis is complete research has been conducted) of the proposed project in detailing modeled estimates. 300 words or less. Modeling results indicate construction of this project will have net benefit on water quality. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID P Yes F No F N/A techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The project will be following the concepts of LID in order to restore the hydrologic cycle to mimic pre development hydrology e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management XF Yes F No F- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? XF Yes F No F- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No r N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No r N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No I%' N/A Project Template Page 13 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No r N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No r N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 14 of 14 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization El Dorado County Name of Primary Contact Daniel Kikkert Name of Secondary Contact Russell Wigart Mailing Address 924B Emerald Bay Road, South Lake Tahoe, CA. 96150 E-mail Dan.kikkert@edcgov.us; RusselLwigart@edcEov.us Phone (###)###-#### (530) 573-7914; (530) 573-7924 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC), United States Forest Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Service,Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA), Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWCQB) Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Delaware Water Quality Project Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater FV_ Restoration F470 Storm Water/Flood Control ** Listed in SRP for SW/FC Project Description Urban development in the Delaware residential area has (Briefly describe the project, in 300 resulted in a concentrated flow of stormwater from the words or less) County of Eldorado (County) right-of-way(ROW) directed to pervious forested land as well into the Upper Truckee River. The hydrologic connectivity between Lake Tahoe and the Delaware Project area results in high potential to deliver fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. Through this project the County proposes to construct erosion control improvements throughout the project area. Stormwater runoff will be directed to infiltration and capturing improvements providing a direct reduction in the transport of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. It is also anticipated that existing urban stormwater infrastructure will be upgraded to current design specifications by improving conveyance systems to allow for proper flow sizing and routing. The tributary watershed outfall of the Project area is in close proximity to the Upper Truckee River. This Project is also identified as in the TRPA Environmental Improvement Program (EIP) as Project#194. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 6 of 7 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes; the project ties in directly with larger projects which Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? include: 1) Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program If so provide description. and 2) Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load reduction efforts. In addition,the project components are related to Tahoe Sierra IRWM local, regional, and state planning efforts to help improve water quality and restore the natural processes of the environment. Political Support—List related MOUs, 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 208 of the Clean agreements or TACs currently in place. Water Act,the TRPA prepared a Water Quality Management Plan (208 Plan) in 1978 for the Lake Tahoe Basin.The 208 Plan identifies erosion, runoff, and disturbance resulting from development such as subdivision roads as primary causes of the decline of Lake Tahoe's water quality.The 208 Plan also mandates that capital improvement projects such as this Project be implemented to bring all County roads into compliance with Best Management Practices (BMPs) by the year 2008. 2.The Lahontan RWCQB adopted a Basin Plan in the early 1980's that also mandated that BMPs be implemented within the Tahoe Basin to protect the water quality of Lake Tahoe and its tributaries. 3. In 1987,the CTC completed a report entitled "A Report on Soil Erosion Control Needs and Project in the Basin"that further identified specific project areas for BMP retrofit. 4. In 1992,TRPA and the County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) related to completing various water quality and erosion control efforts within the County of El Dorado using the Department of Transportation Maintenance Division. 5. In 1997,TRPA developed a Basin-wide Environmental Improvement Program (EIP)that defined various projects in need of BMP/erosion control retrofits. 6. In 2007, Basin plan updates and TMDL effort. 7. In 2013,TRPA Regional Plan Update Project Location: Latitude: 38°51'51.356"N Longitude: 120°2'5.319"W Project Location Description (e.g.,along The project is near the area of Meyers, bounded by the south bank of stream/river Delaware Street to the south, Upper Truckee River to the between river miles or miles from east, Koru Street to the west, and Kiowa Drive to the North. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Project Template Page 2 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL Reduction in standards in accordance with the r Yes requires the reduction of Fine pounds of attainment date, and participate in Sediment Particles to Lake pollutants N/A the development of future TMDLs. Tahoe.This project meets that objective. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project will use LID, Volume of implementing measures such as W Yes stormwater runoff volume stormwater stormwater LID retrofits, erosion reduction and infiltration as captured and/or r N/A control/restoration to meet Water well as source control infiltrated Quality Objectives(WQOs)for practice to prevent erosion. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality The project will be fitted with #of storm events monitoring programs through F Yes a pressure transducer to for which data planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A monitor pre/post project are collected annually throughout the Region. stormwater runoff. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F-0 N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS3 - Implement and promote water This project will work with #of parcels conservation measures and practices r Yes residents to reduce the need to meet state goals. r N/A for irrigation by promoting drought tolerant landscapes. GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. P N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Public outreach and protection activities for high quality r Yes Community watershed groundwater, and advocate for education is critical goal of N/A improvements to impacted this project groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy W N/A watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement Preventing the spread and Count of noxious programs to prevent the spread of r Yes eradication of invasive weed populations existing invasive species and r N/A species through vegetative identified and colonization of potential future management and native removed. invasive species. plant selection will be encouraged through the project and public participation process. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Defensible space, wildfire #of parcels public and private landowners, FV Yes prevention and compliance participating in activities to manage forest health and r N/A with applicable laws will be process. wildfire risks. encouraged through the project delivery and community engagement process. Includes coordination with the Tahoe Fire and Fuel Team (TFFT). Project Template Page 4 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV_ Yes This project has an element #of parcels. caused by existing and new to investigate and implement development. r N/A residential treatment BMPs for existing and new development sites. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The project will be working water-related planning activities FV Yes with the community to within the planning horizon as educate them on watershed N/A supported by current and future processes and also providing watershed science. feedback to the scientific community through monitoring and measurements. Sustainable methods, water efficiency, storm water harvesting will be encouraged through public outreach and participation. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project fits into a multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes regional program and utilizes Region for information exchange. collaboration and N/A information exchange among implementing agencies. IWM3 - Increase public education and This project includes an awareness of watershed functions, r Yes extensive community protection and restoration needs to r N/A outreach component to encourage stewardship by the public. inform and educate the public of the need for BMP retrofit and encourage public participation through BMP implementation, rain water harvesting, recycling, nutrient management and responsible management practices IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes r N/A Project Template Page 5 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water harvesting for reuse, water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge groundwater recharge,flood through stormwater r N/A management) in local and regional infiltration, water quality planning efforts and support efforts improvements through to continue improving the science. restoration of stream zones and infiltration of runoff. Meteorological data will continued to be collected to understand the longterm trend in rainfall and runoff with water quality and runoff volume data recorded to understand benefits.All data will be collected and distributed to the scientific community as information is collected and compiled. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Provide for flow routing and flow climate change'. control, groundwater recharge to increase water supply. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Look to use green technology during emissions (e.g.green technology). construction to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the project. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Encourage xeriscaping and rain water not already mentioned elsewhere. harvesting for irrigation. Promote water reuse and discourage using local water supplies for irrigation. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F7 Yes F- No Water conservation programs help to increase urban water use efficiency Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes F470 No System Reoperation F- Yes F7 No Project Template Page 7 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F_ Yes FV_ No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater Fv- Yes F_ No groundwater recharge and restoring surface hydrology Desalination F_ Yes Fv- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes Fv- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F_ Yes Fv- No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes FY-0 No Pollution Prevention F40- Yes F_ No Decrease sediment and nutrient loading to the Upper Truckee River and Lake Tahoe Salt and Salinity Management F_ Yes P07 No Urban Runoff Management r Yes F_ No This project will improve water quality through infiltration, source control, restoration/upgrading of infrastructure.This project is a large fine sediment contributor to Lake Tahoe in El Dorado County and is expected to yield significant load reductions for the Tahoe TMDL. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes Fv-O No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes FvO_ No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F_ Yes Fv-O No Forest Management Fy-' Yes F No Will work with TFFT and private homeowners on defensible space and wild fire suppression Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F No Project will be coordinated with the County of El Dorado Stormwater Management Plan Recharge Areas Protection ry-' Yes F No If possible, stormwater infiltration basins will be incorporated into the design. These sites have potential to recharge the aquifer. Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes Fv-O No Watershed Management Fy-' Yes F_ No This project will implement sustainable solutions to implement Project Template Page 8 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? plans, programs and projects that support and enhance terrestrial life within its boundary.The project seeks to manage water quality, drainage and stormwater runoff Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes FV_ No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2019 Dollars) $250,000 $0 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $7,500 $0 $7,500 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $350,000 $0 Planning and Design of Improvements Phase 2 $642,500 $7,500 Construction of Improvements Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project - $0 cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding IRWM, PROP 1, LTRA $1,000,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. 2015,TRPA Mitigation Funds e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be provided will be financed for the 25-year planning by the County of El Dorado street maintenance period for project implementation (not grant division and the County Road fund funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual based on prior County projects of similar planning, bid,etc.) size and scope. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if If not funded this area will continue to produce the project is not funded. (300 words or less) elevated levels of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe reducing the opportunity to meet water quality objectives and compliance with the Tahoe TMDL. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes This project is scheduled 1/2020 10/2020 Evaluation ❑x ❑X No to start planning activities in 2020 F N/A b. Final Design F Yes Development of Final 10/2020 3/2021 F ONo Plans, Contract Specifications, and F N/A Estimates c. Environmental F Yes Initial Study for Admin 6/2020 12/2020 Documentation F ❑x No Draft and Final CEQA (CEQA/NEPA) Documents. F N/A d. Permitting F- Yes Obtaining TRPA permit, 10/2020 1/2021 F ❑x No Lahontan Permit, USFS Special Use Permit, and F N/A CTC License Agreements e. Construction F Yes Final BOS Approval of 3/2021 7/2021 Contracting F ❑x No Contract Documents, Advertisement, and F N/A Award of Contract f. Construction F- Yes Construction of Project, 7/2021 10/2023 Implementation F ❑x No post construction irrigation and monitoring F N/A effforts Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed County of El Dorado Stormwater project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Management Plan/Pollutant Load Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Reduction Plan, Lahontan Basin Plan, Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) TRPA Regional Plan, DWR Urban Water Management Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 1. County of El Dorado Stormwater feasibility of this project Management Plan Update (2013) 2. El Dorado County Pollutant Load Reduction Plan (2009) 3. El Dorado County Baseline Pollutant Load Estimate Report (2011) 4.Tahoe Sierra Stormwater Resource Plan (2018) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Pollutant Load Analysis is complete research has been conducted) of the proposed project in detailing modeled estimates. 300 words or less. Modeling results indicate construction of this project will have net benefit on water quality. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID P Yes F No F N/A techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The project will be following the concepts of LID in order to restore the hydrologic cycle to mimic pre development hydrology e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management XF Yes F No F- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? XF Yes F No F- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No r N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No r N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No I%' N/A Project Template Page 12 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No r N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No r N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization El Dorado County Name of Primary Contact Daniel Kikkert Name of Secondary Contact Russell Wigart Mailing Address 924B Emerald Bay Road, South Lake Tahoe, CA. 96150 E-mail Dan.kikkert@edcgov.us; RusselLwigart@edcEov.us Phone (###)###-#### (530) 573-7914; (530) 573-7924 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC), United States Forest Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Service,Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA), Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWCQB) Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Glenridge Water Quality Project Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater FV_ Restoration F470 Storm Water/Flood Control ** Listed in SRP for SW/FC Project Description Urban development in the Glendridge residential area has (Briefly describe the project, in 300 resulted in a concentrated flow of stormwater from the words or less) County of Eldorado (County) right-of-way(ROW) directed to Lake Tahoe. The hydrologic connectivity between Lake Tahoe and the Glenridge Project area results in high potential to deliver fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. Through this project the County proposes to construct erosion control improvements throughout the project area. Stormwater runoff will be directed to infiltration and capturing improvements providing a direct reduction in the transport of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe. It is also anticipated that existing urban stormwater infrastructure will be upgraded to current design specifications by improving conveyance systems to allow for proper flow sizing and routing. The tributary watershed outfall of the Project area is in close proximity to Lake Tahoe. This Project is also identified as in the TRPA Environmental Improvement Program (EIP) as Project#712. Total number of projects 7 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 7 of 7 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes; the project ties in directly with larger projects which Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? include: 1) Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program If so provide description. and 2) Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load reduction efforts. In addition,the project components are related to Tahoe Sierra IRWM local, regional, and state planning efforts to help improve water quality and restore the natural processes of the environment. Political Support—List related MOUs, 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 208 of the Clean agreements or TACs currently in place. Water Act,the TRPA prepared a Water Quality Management Plan (208 Plan) in 1978 for the Lake Tahoe Basin.The 208 Plan identifies erosion, runoff, and disturbance resulting from development such as subdivision roads as primary causes of the decline of Lake Tahoe's water quality.The 208 Plan also mandates that capital improvement projects such as this Project be implemented to bring all County roads into compliance with Best Management Practices (BMPs) by the year 2008. 2.The Lahontan RWCQB adopted a Basin Plan in the early 1980's that also mandated that BMPs be implemented within the Tahoe Basin to protect the water quality of Lake Tahoe and its tributaries. 3. In 1987,the CTC completed a report entitled "A Report on Soil Erosion Control Needs and Project in the Basin"that further identified specific project areas for BMP retrofit. 4. In 1992,TRPA and the County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) related to completing various water quality and erosion control efforts within the County of El Dorado using the Department of Transportation Maintenance Division. 5. In 1997,TRPA developed a Basin-wide Environmental Improvement Program (EIP)that defined various projects in need of BMP/erosion control retrofits. 6. In 2007, Basin plan updates and TMDL effort. 7. In 2013,TRPA Regional Plan Update Project Location: Latitude: 39°2'39.54"N Longitude: 120°7'23.214"W Project Location Description (e.g.,along The project is near the west shore of Lake Tahoe, bounded the south bank of stream/river by Sunnyview Drive to the south, Highway 89 to the east, between river miles or miles from USFS property to the west, and Northridge Drive to the Towns/intersection and/or address): North. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Project Template Page 2 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL Reduction in standards in accordance with the r Yes requires the reduction of Fine pounds of attainment date, and participate in Sediment Particles to Lake pollutants N/A the development of future TMDLs. Tahoe.This project meets that objective. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project will use LID, Volume of implementing measures such as W Yes stormwater runoff volume stormwater stormwater LID retrofits, erosion reduction and infiltration as captured and/or r N/A control/restoration to meet Water well as source control infiltrated Quality Objectives(WQOs)for practice to prevent erosion. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality The project will be fitted with #of storm events monitoring programs through F Yes a pressure transducer to for which data planning horizon, and coordinate r_ N/A monitor pre/post project are collected annually throughout the Region. stormwater runoff. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F-0 N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS3 - Implement and promote water This project will work with #of parcels conservation measures and practices r Yes residents to reduce the need to meet state goals. r N/A for irrigation by promoting drought tolerant landscapes. GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. P N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Public outreach and protection activities for high quality r Yes Community watershed groundwater, and advocate for education is critical goal of N/A improvements to impacted this project groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy W N/A watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement Preventing the spread and Count of noxious programs to prevent the spread of r Yes eradication of invasive weed populations existinginvasive species and species through vegetative p � N/A identified and colonization of potential future management and native removed. invasive species. plant selection will be encouraged through the project and public participation process. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Defensible space, wildfire #of parcels public and private landowners, FV Yes prevention and compliance participating in activities to manage forest health and r N/A with applicable laws will be process. wildfire risks. encouraged through the project delivery and community engagement process. Includes coordination with the Tahoe Fire and Fuel Team (TFFT). Project Template Page 4 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV_ Yes This project has an element #of parcels. caused by existing and new to investigate and implement development. r N/A residential treatment BMPs for existing and new development sites. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The project will be working water-related planning activities FV Yes with the community to within the planning horizon as educate them on watershed N/A supported by current and future processes and also providing watershed science. feedback to the scientific community through monitoring and measurements. Sustainable methods, water efficiency, storm water harvesting will be encouraged through public outreach and participation. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project fits into a multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes regional program and utilizes Region for information exchange. collaboration and N/A information exchange among implementing agencies. IWM3 - Increase public education and This project includes an awareness of watershed functions, r Yes extensive community protection and restoration needs to r N/A outreach component to encourage stewardship by the public. inform and educate the public of the need for BMP retrofit and encourage public participation through BMP implementation, rain water harvesting, recycling, nutrient management and responsible management practices IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes r N/A Project Template Page 5 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water harvesting for reuse, water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge groundwater recharge,flood through stormwater r N/A management) in local and regional infiltration, water quality planning efforts and support efforts improvements through to continue improving the science. restoration of stream zones and infiltration of runoff. Meteorological data will continued to be collected to understand the long term trend in rainfall and runoff with water quality and runoff volume data recorded to understand benefits.All data will be collected and distributed to the scientific community as information is collected and compiled. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Provide for flow routing and flow climate change'. control, groundwater recharge to increase water supply. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Look to use green technology during emissions (e.g.green technology). construction to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the project. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Encourage xeriscaping and rain water not already mentioned elsewhere. harvesting for irrigation. Promote water reuse and discourage using local water supplies for irrigation. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F7 Yes F- No Water conservation programs help to increase urban water use efficiency Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes F470 No System Reoperation F- Yes F7 No Project Template Page 7 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F Yes V No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater FV_ Yes F- No groundwater recharge and restoring surface hydrology Desalination F- Yes FV_ No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F- Yes FV_ No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes F No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes FV_ No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes FV_ No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes FY-1 No Pollution Prevention r7l Yes F- No Decrease sediment and nutrient loading to Lake Tahoe Salt and Salinity Management F_ Yes r No Urban Runoff Management FV_ Yes F- No This project will improve water quality through infiltration, source control, restoration/upgrading of infrastructure. This project is a large fine sediment contributor to Lake Tahoe in El Dorado County and is expected to yield significant load reductions for the Tahoe TMDL. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F- Yes 41 No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F- Yes V No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F- Yes V No Forest Management FV_ Yes No Will work with TFFT and private homeowners on defensible space and wild fire suppression Land Use Planning and Management I�W Yes F- No Project will be coordinated with the County of El Dorado Stormwater Management Plan Recharge Areas Protection ry-' Yes F No If possible, stormwater infiltration basins will be incorporated into the design. These sites have potential to recharge the aquifer. Water-dependent Recreation F- Yes FV_ No Watershed Management FV_ Yes F- No This project will implement sustainable solutions to implement plans, programs and projects that Project Template Page 8 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? support and enhance terrestrial life within its boundary.The project seeks to manage water quality, drainage and stormwater runoff Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management Yes Y' No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2020 Dollars) $250,000 $0 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $7,500 $0 $7,500 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $300,000 $0 Planning and Design of Improvements Phase 2 $492,500 $7,500 Construction of Improvements Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project - $0 cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding IRWM, PROP 1, LTRA $800,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. 2015,TRPA Mitigation Funds e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be provided will be financed for the 25-year planning by the County of El Dorado street maintenance period for project implementation (not grant division and the County Road fund funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual based on prior County projects of similar planning, bid,etc.) size and scope. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if If not funded this area will continue to produce the project is not funded. (300 words or less) elevated levels of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe reducing the opportunity to meet water quality objectives and compliance with the Tahoe TMDL. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F_ Yes This project is scheduled 1/2021 10/2021 Evaluation ❑x ❑x No to start planning activities in 2019 F N/A b. Final Design F Yes Development of Final 10/2021 3/2021 F 0No Plans, Contract Specifications, and F N/A Estimates c. Environmental F Yes Initial Study for Admin 6/2021 12/2021 Documentation F ONo Draft and Final CEQA (CEQA/NEPA) Documents. F N/A d. Permitting F Yes Obtaining TRPA permit, 10/2021 1/2022 F ❑x No Lahontan Permit, USFS Special Use Permit, and F N/A CTC License Agreements e. Construction F Yes Final BOS Approval of 3/2022 7/2022 Contracting F ❑X No Contract Documents, Advertisement, and F N/A Award of Contract f. Construction F Yes Construction of Project, 7/2022 10/2024 Implementation F [E]No post construction irrigation and monitoring F N/A effforts Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed County of El Dorado Stormwater project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Management Plan/Pollutant Load Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Reduction Plan, Lahontan Basin Plan, Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) TRPA Regional Plan, DWR Urban Water Management Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 1. County of El Dorado Stormwater feasibility of this project Management Plan Update (2013) 2. El Dorado County Pollutant Load Reduction Plan (2009) 3. El Dorado County Baseline Pollutant Load Estimate Report (2011) 4.Tahoe Sierra Stormwater Resource Plan (2018) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Pollutant Load Analysis is complete research has been conducted) of the proposed project in detailing modeled estimates. 300 words or less. Modeling results indicate construction of this project will have net benefit on water quality. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID P Yes F No F N/A techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The project will be following the concepts of LID in order to restore the hydrologic cycle to mimic pre development hydrology e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management XF Yes F No r N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? XF Yes F No r N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No r N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No r N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due l— Yes F No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No I%' N/A Project Template Page 12 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No r N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No r N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 04/02/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Markleeville Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Steve Martin Name of Secondary Contact Joanne Oehlerking Mailing Address 1200 Hot Springs Road, Markleeville, CA 96120 E-mail mj 111 @frontier.com Phone(###)###-#### 530-694-22924 Other Cooperating Alpine Watershed Group, Alpine County Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion?If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title MPUD Sewer Line Relocation Project Category Water Supply/Wastewater FV_ Restoration F%07 Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The project will 1) restore the natural stream channel and (Briefly describe the project,in 300 floodplain to improve geomorphic function and reconnect words or less) the stream to its historic floodplain, and 2) relocate and replace aging sewer infrastructure in the floodplain to reduce the threat of water quality impairments from flooding and sewer leaks, 3) construct a storm water capture and infiltration system for highway runoff, and 4) a provide public access and recreations features including walking trails and interpretive signage. Total number of projects 1 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes. It's in Phase 3 of 3. It is also a restoration priority of Project (e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Carson River Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan (2007) If so provide description. and Carson River Watershed Floodplain Management Plan (2008). It also achieves the Markleeville PUD's sewer facility safety assessment and remediation plans. The project is also a component of the Alpine County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Political Support—List related MOUs, MOU with Alpine Watershed Group and Markleeville Public agreements or TACs currently in place. Utility District; MOU with U.S. Forest and Bureau of Land Management regarding land transfer and restoration; Tahoe Sierra IRWM Technical Advisory Committee involved in design review and project planning Project Location: Latitude: N 38.694861 Longitude: W 119.777972 Project Location Description (e.g.,along the south bank of stream/river Along the northwest bank of Markleeville Creek,just between river miles or miles from downstream (east)of Highway 89 bridge Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) WQ1 -Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with F_ Yes the attainment date, and r N/A participate in the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Project will reduce the threat of implementing measures such F7 Yes water quality impairments from as stormwater LID retrofits, F_ N/A flooding and sewer leaks; project erosion control/restoration to will install storm water treatment meet Water Quality Objectives system for Highway 89 runoff; (WQOs)for receiving water restored floodplain will spread and bodies established in the Basin slow water flows effectively Plan within the planning horizon. reducing erosion and allow trapping of sediments/nutrients during overbank events WQ3-Implement water quality Project involves stream monitoring monitoring programs through F7 Yes component since 2006, involving planning horizon, and F_ N/A stream bioassessment(benthic coordinate annually throughout macroinvertebrates and riparian the Region. habitat) and chemical monitoring for pre and post-project comparison Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) WQ4-Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water r Yes systems continues to meet W_ N/A Federal and State standards. WQ5-Restore degraded Project site lacks stream bank, 1 acre of streams,wetlands, riparian and r Yes riparian and upland vegetation due floodplain upland areas to re-establish F_ N/A to past development and reconstructed natural water filtering processes. alteration; Restored floodplain will and riparian reestablish natural water filtering vegetation processes, provide ecological restored benefits of overbanking and establish biogeochemical cycling WQ6-Operate and maintain, Project will replace aging sewer 700 linear feet of build,or replace infrastructure r Yes infrastructure,eliminate all new sewer line for reliable collection,treatment r- N/A manholes in the floodplain and through the and disposal of wastewater. reduce the threat of water quality floodplain; 4 new impairments from flooding and manholes located sewer leaks outside the floodplain WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a r Yes 20-year planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build,or replace infrastructure r Yes to reliably supply water. r N/A WS3-Implement and promote water conservation measures r Yes and practices to meet state r N/A goals. GWM1-Maintain and monitor r- Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) GWM2-Promote groundwater protection activities for high r Yes quality groundwater, and P'_ N/A advocate for improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3-Manage groundwater for multiple uses(e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1-Enhance and restore water Project will enhance degraded 400 linear feet of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas r Yes streams to support healthy native streambank and associated uplands to r N/A fish population; reestablishing stabilized; 1 acre support healthy watersheds, riparian environment will provide of floodplain viable native fish,wildlife and important wildlife habitat and restored plant habitats. travel corridors; project will recover lost habitat due to site development ER2-Develop and implement Project involves site monitoring 5 acres programs to prevent the spread r Yes and stewardship to prevent any monitored for of existing invasive species and r N/A future infestation weed-free status colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3-Implement, in coordination with public and private F Yes landowners, activities to manage P'_ N/A forest health and wildfire risks. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) ER4-Minimize ecosystem FV Yes Sewer system improvements will 700 linear feet of impacts caused by existing and reduce potential for leaks; phase 1 new sewer line new development. F N/A of the project involved relocating through the the USFS facility and removing floodplain; 4 new existing structures from the site; manholes located phase 3 will remove floodwall outside the which channelizes stream and floodplain; 250 increases water velocity and bank linear feet of erosion; project will revegetate floodwall erodible soils removed;2 acres of land revegetated IWM1-Conduct local and Project applies proven stream and 2007 Markleeville regional water-related planning r Yes floodplain restoration practices; Creek Restoration activities within the planning F N/A Technical Advisory Committee Design Report horizon as supported by current guiding all aspects of project design and 2013 Design and future watershed science. and implementation Plan provide scientific basis IWM2- Ensure collaboration Collaboration is an integral part of 8 natural among multiple jurisdictions r Yes the project given the multi resource agencies within the Region for F N/A components of the project— and community information exchange. stream restoration,sewer,and groups public recreation/education;the represented on Technical Advisory Committee Technical provides diverse professional input; Advisory public outreach efforts offer Committee valuable community representation Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) IWM3- Increase public Public education component of 10 watershed education and awareness of r Yes project will engage community and stewards watershed functions, protection F N/A visitors in learning about monitoring site; and restoration needs to watershed resources and hands-on 30 volunteers encourage stewardship by the activities to assist with restoration assisting with public. and natural resource protection; maintenance; volunteers will also be involved in increased natural long-term project stewardship resource through annual restoration projects awareness of 100 and ongoing site monitoring community members and visitor IWM4-Promote activities that Existing flood wall has exacerbated 250 linear feet of reduce flood risk. r Yes flooding condition at the site and floodwall r accelerated bank failure removed; 1 acre downstream; reconstructed of floodplain N/A floodplain will permit for reconstructed overbanking and alleviate current flood hazards; project will reduce risk of sewer system inundation due to flooding and reduce risk of sewer pipe failure; reduce flood risk IWM5-Address climate change Restored floodplain will allow 1 acre of (e.g.water quality,water supply, FV_ Yes stream corridor to accommodate floodplain groundwater recharge,flood F N/A variable flood flows;floodplain will reconstructed management) in local and offer some water storage and and riparian regional planning efforts and attenuate stream flow; improved vegetation support efforts to continue stream bank and riparian area restored improving the science. vegetation will provide a carbon bank IWM6-Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities r Yes in order to improve coordination F%0_ N/A with regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F_ N/A Project is being planned in partnership with considerations. Washoe Tribe; representative from Washoe Environmental Protection Department serves on Technical Advisory Committee; working to integrate native American historical and cultural interpretive signs b. Disadvantaged Community Fv- N/A considerations'. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. Fv- N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects F_ N/A Project will help mitigate potential long- of climate change'. term impacts of climate change as described in IWMS e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse P7 N/A gas emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that r N/A are not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes FV_ No Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes FV_ No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance-Regional/ local r Yes Fv_ No System Reoperation r Yes r No Water Transfers r Yes r No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater i— Yes FV_ No Desalination r Yes FV_ No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water r Yes FV_ No Surface Storage-- Regional/Local r Yes FV_ No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes FV_ No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes FV_ No Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes FV_ No Pollution Prevention FV Yes r No Reduced erosion due to stream channelization and decaying floodwall; reduce potential for sewage leaks/spills Salt and Salinity Management r Yes r No Urban Runoff Management r Yes r No Storm water treatment system for highway runoff will be installed Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes FV_ No Economic Incentives(Loans, Grants, and r Yes FV_ No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes r No Provides multiple environmental benefits(chemical, biological, geomorphic and hydrologic) Forest Management r Yes FV_ No Land Use Planning and Management PO Yes r No Project has been integrated into downtown Markleeville bike and pedestrian plans; helps meet ordinances of the County Code; meets long-standing commitment with U.S. Forest Service to reclaim and remediate property Recharge Areas Protection r Yes FV_ No Water-dependent Recreation FV_ Yes r No Will offer stream access, riparian walking trails and natural resource Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? interpretive signage Watershed Management F%0 Yes F_ No High priority restoration project; addressed in multiple watershed management plans Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F%O- Yes F_ No Alleviates and mitigates flood impacts Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing -Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share:Non-State Cost Share: Total Cost Grant Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Funding Fund Source Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $1,750,000 $50,000 $1,800,000 OR F_ DAC 2. Annual Operations and $5-10,000 annually for Maintenance(O&M) general maintenance b.Can the Project be phased? V Yes F_ No 1. If so provide cost Project O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Cost Phase 1 $600,000 Sewer system modifications Phase 2 $1,400,000 Site restoration and sewer activation Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s)of funding for Project District Attorney Trust $27,000 cost Fund d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured Alpine Watershed $23,000 funding and certainty of the sources for Group and County staff Project cost. time e.Explain how operation and maintenance Covered by additional grant funding and partner match costs will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Technical Specifications for Sewer and Restoration planning,bid,etc.) Design Plans g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been FV_ Yes F_ No completed? h.Please describe what impact there may be If this project were not to proceed,the existing if the project is not funded. (300 words or condition of the project site would continue to less) jeopardize water quality and the integrity of the stream channel. The floodwall and stream banks will continue to degrade and jeopardize the stability of the sewer lines through that area. Also the sewer manholes will remain in the floodplain and will risk flooding and sewer leaks. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement,Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Planned/Act Planned/ Current Activities in Each ual Start Actual Project Project Stage Date Completion Stage (mm/yr) Date(mm/yr) a. Assessment and XYes Preliminary planning, December Evaluation F r No community outreach 2013 F Yes F and project assessment b. Final Design XYes Sewer and Restoration December F F No Design Plans complete 2014 r c. Environmental XYes Project Description, December Documentation F r No Initial Study and 2014 (CEQA/NEPA) Mitigated Negative r Declaration complete d. Permitting r Yes Necessary permitting January August 2017 X XNo packages being 2017 developed F N/A e. Construction F Yes January May 2018 Contracting F XNo 2018 r N/A f. Construction F Yes June 2018 December Implementation F XNo 2019 F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the Upper Carson River Watershed Stream Corridor proposed project is consistent with or Condition Assessment(2004), Carson River supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan (2007), GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Carson River Watershed Floodplain Management Conservation Plans,TMDLs,Basin Plans,etc.) Plan (2008) b. List technical reports and studies supporting 2007 Markleeville Creek Restoration Design the feasibility of this project Report and 2013 Design Plan provide hydro- geomorphic analysis and modeling c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. Environmental consultants have conducted how much research has been conducted) of hydraulic and geomorphic assessment,collected the proposed project in 300 words or less. supplemental observations of site geomorphology, hydraulics and vegetation, validated flood model for existing conditions and done engineering review of sewer system modifications. As mentioned above,the project has been identified as a restoration priority in multiple watershed assessments. d. Does the project implement green r Yes No XN/A technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques,etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water r Yes F No F N/A Management Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter r Yes r No r N/A requirements(CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions r Yes r No r N/A above is"no", do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an F- Yes i No r N/A AWMP(due 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an r Yes r No r N/A AWMP prior to receiving project Provide Explanation if necessary: funding? Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and F Yes F No F N/A submitted for the subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within F Yes F No F N/A 1 year of the grant submittal date? 1. Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Placer County DPW Tahoe Engineering Division Name of Primary Contact Kansas McGahan Name of Secondary Contact Peter Kraatz Mailing Address PO Box 336 Kings Beach, CA 96143 E-mail kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov Phone (###)###-#### (530) 581-6217 Other Cooperating US Forest Service Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes. committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Coon Street SEZ Restoration Improvements Project Category Water Supply/Wastewater F Restoration F_ Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description This project proposes to restore the natural Coon Creek (Briefly describe the project, in 300 channel that was encroached upon by the urbanization of words or less) Kings Beach. The current channel is degraded with steep erosive banks. Overtopping of the channel is common. Riparian vegetation is disturbed. Placer County Department of Public Works and Facilities is proposing to restore flow into a sinuous channel, and restore associated riparian and adjacent SEZ vegetation. Wetland restoration work will improve riparian areas to reduce flow rates and delay peak flows to improve groundwater recharge and revegetation of indigenous wetland plantings. Approximately 2,000 feet of channel and riparian area will be targeted for improvement. Total number of restoration 2 Project Prioritization: projects submitted by Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 of 2 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Implementation of the project would further the goals of the Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3)? Kings Beach Watershed Improvement Project(EIP Project If so provide description. No. 01.01.01.0036). Tahoe Sierra IRWM At this time,Jurisdictions do not receive TMDL credit for SEZ restoration, however,the project would further the goals of the stormwater Program by reducing sediment into Lake Tahoe and restoring SEZ acreage. Political Support—List related MOUs, This project is in the design stage. No MOUs are set up at agreements or TACs currently in place. this time. Some easements will need to be acquired. Project Location: Kings Beach Latitude: 39.239974 N Longitude: 120.02168 W Project Location Description (e.g., along Coon Creek, along Coon Street in Kings Beach. the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL TMDL credit for sediment .75 to 1.25 acres standards in accordance with the F0 Yes reduction is anticipated in of SEZ wetlands attainment date, and participate in F_ N/A future years. restored. the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Enlargement/restoration of .75 to 1.25 acres implementing measures such as F Yes wetlands; re-establish natural of SEZ wetlands stormwater LID retrofits, erosion I N/A filtration processes of riparian restored. control/restoration to meet Water vegetation. Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State F N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Restoration of natural channel wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to approximate historical to re-establish natural water filtering F N/A function as best as possible. processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. F0 N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably Yes supply water. F N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water The products or deliverables conservation measures and practices F Yes of the project will incorporate to meet state goals. F N/A the concepts outlined in the California Water Action Plan. GWM1 - Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural FT N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy F N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement Would likely be required of programs to prevent the spread of F0 Yes any revegetation plan existing invasive species and F N/A subsequent to construction. colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and F N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes Previous development caused by existing and new impacts to the Coon Creek development. F N/A wetlands ecosystem will be mitigated. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as F N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Consistent community multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes planning efforts. Region for information exchange. F N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to F N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes F N/A Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Additional storage capacity for water quality,water supply, F Yes within the Kings Beach groundwater recharge,flood F N/A Watershed will increase flood management) in local and regional management, although that is planning efforts and support efforts not a primary objective of the to continue improving the science. project. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with F N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community Fw- N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. I✓ N/A Kings Beach is a DAC. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. F N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F N/A Some additional flood management climate change'. and water storage/infiltration. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F N/A Additional vegetation will mitigate emissions (e.g.green technology). CO2 emissions in the urbanized community of Kings Beach. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes F No Not Applicable Urban Water Use Efficiency F Yes F No Increased storage and infiltration Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F Yes F No Increased storage and infiltration System Reoperation F Yes F No Water Transfers F Yes F No Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes F No Increased infiltration for groundwater recharge. Desalination F Yes F No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes F No Surface Storage -- Regional/Local F Yes F No Increased storage capacity Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F-Yes F No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F No Improvement on Lake Tahoe water body(303-d impaired) Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Sediment and nutrient reduction into Lake Tahoe Salt and Salinity Management F Yes F No Urban Runoff Management F Yes F No Sediment and nutrient reduction into Lake Tahoe Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes F No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes F No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes F No Restoration Forest Management F Yes F No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes F No Removing impervious surfaces and relocating commercial space to better land use. Recharge Areas Protection F Yes F No Water-dependent Recreation F Yes r No Lake Tahoe recreational needs Watershed Management r Yes No TRPA EIP Program Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes F No Increased storage. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $ TBD OR F DAC 2. Annual Operations and TBD Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Yes F No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Design, permitting 250,000 0 Design/Permits/CEQA and Environmental Docs Phase 2 125,000 0 Design Easements Phase 3 875,000 0 Preliminary Estimate. Restoration Construction $ 1,250,000 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project USFS $50,000 cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding TBD(unknown) and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Cost share or existing assessment district monies, will be financed for the 25-year planning annual operating budget of Placer County. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual planning and preliminary design planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F Yes F No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The project will likely move ahead in one form or the project is not funded. (300 words or less) another. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Corn Project in Each Project Stage Actual pletion Date Stage Start Date a. Assessment and ® Yes Preliminary design and 2016- Evaluation ❑ ❑ No concept plans are 2018 ❑ N/A complete. b. Final Design ❑ Yes 2019 2021 ® ® No ❑ N/A c. Environmental ❑ Yes 2019 2020 Documentation ❑ ❑ No (CEQA/NEPA) ❑ N/A d. Permitting ❑ Yes 2020 ❑ ® No ❑ N/A e. Construction ❑ Yes 2021 TBD Contracting ❑ ® No ❑ N/A f. Construction ❑ Yes 2021 2024 Implementation ❑ ® No ❑ N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Consistent with newly-updated project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General community plan(s)TRPA and Kings Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Beach. Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) Still in planning, but will likely follow Placer County LID design guidelines. 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': NO(all N/A) 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project Provide Explanation if necessary: funding f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: NO(all N/A) 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: NO (all N/A) 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Placer County DPW Tahoe Engineering Division Name of Primary Contact Brian Stewart Name of Secondary Contact Kansas McGahan or Brian Stewart Mailing Address PO Box 336 Kings Beach, CA 96143 E-mail bstewart@placer.ca.gov Phone (###)###-#### (530) 581-6238 Other Cooperating Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes. committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Burton Creek Restoration Improvements Project Category F_ � Restoration Water Supply/Wastewater F Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description This project proposes to relocate current Placer County (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Department of Public Works and Facilities equipment words or less) and motor vehicle storage, as well as the Placer County Courtroom to county-owned facilities in Truckee, and restore the riparian ecosystem of the developed site. The current 3,400 square foot building and associated DPW garage/maintenance storage out buildings will be removed and operations relocated. The current structure(s) are adjacent to Burton Creek, approximately 1 mile east of Tahoe City in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Wetland restoration work will improve riparian areas to reduce flow rates and delay peak flows to improve groundwater recharge and revegetation of indigenous wetland plantings. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Implementation of the project would further the goals of the Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? TRPA water quality improvements for sediment reduction. If so provide description. At this time,Jurisdictions do not receive TMDL credit. The Tahoe Sierra IRWM project would further the goals of the TRPA EIP Program. Political Support—List related MOUs, This project is in the planning stage, so formal MOUs are not agreements or TACs currently in place. set up at this time. Project Location: Tahoe City Latitude: 39.1447 N Longitude: 120.1701W Project Location Description (e.g., along Along Highway 28 and Lake Forest Road the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of Objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL TMDL credit for sediment .75 to 1.25 acres standards in accordance with the P Yes reduction is anticipated in of wetlands attainment date, and participate in r N/A future years. restored. the development of future TMDLs. WQ2— Reduce pollutant loads by Removal of impervious .75 to 1.25 acres implementing measures such as W Yes surfaces and of wetlands stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F N/A enlargement/restoration of restored. control/restoration to meet Water wetlands; re-establish natural Quality Objectives (WQOs)for filtration processes of riparian receiving water bodies established in vegetation. the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F_ Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. FV N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water The products or deliverables conservation measures and practices r Yes of the project will to meet state goals. F N/A incorporate the concepts outlined in the California Water Action Plan. GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement Would likely be required of programs to prevent the spread of F Yes any revegetation plan existing invasive species and F N/A subsequent to construction. colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F,/_ Yes Previous development caused by existing and new impacts to the Burton Creek development. r N/A wetlands ecosystem will be mitigated. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as F N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Consistent community multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes planning efforts. Region for information exchange. r N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, r Yes protection and restoration needs to r N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes P N/A Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of Objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Additional storage capacity for water quality, water supply, .% Yes Burton Creek will increase groundwater recharge, flood r N/A flood management. management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in 17- Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Some additional flood management climate change'. and water storage/infiltration. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Increased lake access and walkability not already mentioned elsewhere. for community with ancillary improvements. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F70 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F7 Yes F- No Increased storage and infiltration Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F70 Yes F- No Increased storage and infiltration System Reoperation F- Yes F7 No Water Transfers F Yes P-1 No Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater FV Yes No Increased infiltration for groundwater recharge. Desalination F Yes I_ No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes R No Surface Storage-- Regional/Local F%0_ Yes F No Increased storage capacity Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes I7 No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes IO No Matching Water Quality to Use I_ Yes F No Improvement on Lake Tahoe water body(303-d impaired) Pollution Prevention Io Yes F No Sediment and nutrient reduction into Lake Tahoe Salt and Salinity Management F Yes IO No Urban Runoff Management Io Yes F No Sediment and nutrient reduction into Lake Tahoe Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes F No Economic Incentives(Loans, Grants, and F Yes 1740 No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration I7 Yes 7 No Restoration Forest Management r Yes %0 No Land Use Planning and Management P Yes I No Removing impervious surfaces and relocating commercial space to better land use. Recharge Areas Protection F Yes F No Water-dependent Recreation Io Yes F No Lake Tahoe recreational needs Watershed Management Io Yes F No TRPA EIP Program Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management Io Yes F No Increased storage. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $ TBD OR 17- DAC 2. Annual Operations and TBD Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 250,000 0 Planning Planning and Environmental Docs Phase 2 165,000 0 Design Design Phase 3 675,000 0 Preliminary estimate. Restoration Construction Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project NLTRA& Placer 25,000 cost County d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding TBD and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs TBD;Cost share or existing assessment district will be financed for the 25-year planning monies period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Conceptual planning and preliminary planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The project will likely move ahead in one form or the project is not funded. (300 words or less) I another. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and ❑ Yes Project Evaluation ❑ ® No will start ❑ N/A in 2016 b. Final Design ❑ Yes 2018 ❑ ® No ❑ N/A c. Environmental ❑ Yes 2019 Documentation ❑ ® No (CEQA/NEPA) ❑ N/A d. Permitting ❑ Yes 2019 ❑ ® No ❑ N/A e. Construction ❑ Yes 2020 Contracting ❑ ® No ❑ N/A f. Construction ❑ Yes 2024 Implementation ❑ ® No ❑ N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Consistent with newly-updated project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General community plan(s)TRPA and Kings Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Beach. Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) Still in planning, but will likely follow Placer County LID design guidelines. 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': NO(all N/A) 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project Provide Explanation if necessary: funding f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: NO(all N/A) 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: NO (all N/A) 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Placer County Tahoe Engineering Division Name of Primary Contact Kansas McGahan Name of Secondary Contact Dan LaPlante Mailing Address PO Box 336 Kings Beach, CA 96143 E-mail kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov Phone (###)###-#### 530-581-6217 Other Cooperating CTC, CA State Parks Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Kings Beach Western Approach Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater X Restoration X Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The Kings Beach Western Approach Project includes the (Briefly describe the project, in 300 acquisition of sensitive riparian zone parcels in the Griff words or less) Creek flood plain. Both parcels are located in the NE corner of the intersection of HWY 28 and HWY 267.The project proposes the removal of impervious surfaces/structures on these parcels and the restoration of riparian/SEZ vegetation. Total number of projects 13 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes; Project will result in the attenuation of stormwater Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? (increasing capacity/lowering flood potential) and reduction If so provide description. of sediment into Lake Tahoe. Political Support—List related MOUs, No MOUs in place; coordination with CTC and CA State agreements or TACs currently in place. Parks, as well as Caltrans. Project Location: Latitude: 39.2377 N Longitude: 120.0266 W Project Location Description (e.g., along the south bank of stream/river Intersection of HWY 28/HWY 267 in Kings Beach, California between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL X Yes Reduces sediment loading 0.5 acres SEZ standards in accordance with the into Lake Tahoe. restored attainment date, and participate in the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by X Yes Reduces sediment loading 0.5 acres SEZ implementing measures such as into Lake Tahoe. restored stormwater LID retrofits, erosion control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality N/A monitoring programs through planning horizon, and coordinate annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water N/A supplied by public water systems continues to meet Federal and State standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, X Yes Reduces sediment loading 0.5 acres SEZ wetlands, riparian and upland areas into Lake Tahoe. Increases restored to re-establish natural water filtering riparian capacity and processes. decreases flood potential. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or N/A replace infrastructure for reliable collection,treatment and disposal of wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet N/A projected demands for a 20-year planning horizon. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or N/A replace infrastructure to reliably supply water. WS3 - Implement and promote water N/A conservation measures and practices to meet state goals. GWM1- Maintain and monitor N/A groundwater supply to assure future reliability. GWM2 - Promote groundwater N/A protection activities for high quality groundwater, and advocate for improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for N/A multiple uses (e.g. municipal/industrial/agricultural supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water X Yes Reduces sediment loading 0.5 acres SEZ bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and into Lake Tahoe. Increases restored associated uplands to support healthy riparian capacity and watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife decreases flood potential. and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement N/A programs to prevent the spread of existing invasive species and colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with N/A public and private landowners, activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts N/A caused by existing and new development. Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional N/A water-related planning activities within the planning horizon as supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among N/A multiple jurisdictions within the Region for information exchange. IWM3 - Increase public education and X Yes Project implementation can TBD awareness of watershed functions, involve school-aged children protection and restoration needs to through coordination with encourage stewardship by the public. the Sierra Watershed Education Partnership (SWEP) the Placer County TED has partnered with multiple times in the past during restoration project. IWM4- Promote activities that X Yes Increases riparian capacity TBD reduce flood risk. and decreases flood potential. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. N/A water quality,water supply, groundwater recharge,flood management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, N/A release and exchange activities in order to improve coordination with regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A Kings Beach is considered a Disadvantaged Community;jobs, improved walkability, increased open space and lowered flood risk will result after implementation of the project. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. r N/A N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Increased flood protection. climate change'. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F- No No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F- No No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F- Yes F- No No System Reoperation F- Yes F- No No Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F_ Yes F_ No No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F_ Yes No No Desalination F Yes No No Precipitation Enhancement No Recycled Municipal Water F Yes F No No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes F No No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes F No No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes F_ No No Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F No No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Yes Salt and Salinity Management r Yes No No Urban Runoff Management I` Yes No Yes Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes No No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes No No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F_ Yes F No Yes Forest Management F Yes F No No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes F No Yes Recharge Areas Protection F Yes F_ No No Water-dependent Recreation F Yes F No No Watershed Management F Yes r- No Yes Improve Flood Management im Flood Risk Management F_ Yes F_ No Yes Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 2,000,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and 0.00 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F Yes X No; Project will not be phased, but likely constructed over two years. 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project TOT Local funding $300,000 cost CTC Prop 1 $1,650,000(acquisition) FHWA $ 700,000 d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Total Project cost at and certainty of the sources for Project cost. this time (2018) is a WAG.Additional sources of funding may include CA Fish &Wildlife e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Project at completion will become part of the will be financed for the 25-year planning annual maintenance program managed by Placer period for project implementation (not grant County. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual at this time. planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? X No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Commercial building/deterioration and wetland the project is not funded. (300 words or less) impacts will remain. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants: Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation, Environmental Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes Project is currently in 2018 2020 Evaluation X F_ No planning/scoping with Caltrans. F_ N/A b. Final Design F_ Yes 2020 2021 F F_ No F_ N/A c. Environmental F Yes 2019 2020 Documentation F F No (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F Yes 2020 2020 F F No F N/A e. Construction F Yes 2022 2022 Contracting F F No F N/A f. Construction F Yes 2022 2024 Implementation F F No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed This project will be consistent with project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General the Placer County Tahoe Basin Plan, Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat 2017 as well as the CA Parks Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Recreational Plan that will be completed in 2018-2019. b. List technical reports and studies supporting the N/A feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much A formal calculation of the sediment research has been conducted) of the proposed project in reduction and increased capacity will 300 words or less. be done as part of the design process. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. X No alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes No N/A grant submittal date? Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Raina Blasser Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title District Facilities BMPs (BMP Implementation on STPUD Operating Site SWR/WTR) Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater V Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The overarching goal of the Project is to benefit the water (Briefly describe the project, in 300 quality of Lake Tahoe by reducing erosion, sediment flow, words or less) and surface water runoff originating from STPUD facilities. More specifically, the objectives of the Project are to: 1. Reduce sediment loads and nutrients delivered to Lake Tahoe through tributary runoff, urban runoff, and groundwater; 2. Install surface water best management practices (BMPs) at STPUD facilities throughout the tributary area; 3. Restore existing disturbed areas to offset facility impacts; and 4. Restore SEZ's toward a proper functioning condition.These Project objectives will be pursued where feasible, appropriate, cost effective and consistent with District objectives. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 9 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes. Through the TMDL program, five counties, one city, U.S. Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Forest Service, and two state transportation departments If so provide description. collectively are tasked with reducing fine sediment particles reaching the lake by 10 percent in the next five years and by 33 percent in 15 years. Political Support—List related MOUs, STPUD is a partner in the Technical Advisory Committee for Tahoe Sierra IRWM agreements or TACs currently in place. Erosion Control Project implementation, consisting of El Dorado County, City of South Lake Tahoe,Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, US Forest Service, and other partners as appropriate. Project Location: Latitude: 38.92256 Longitude: -119.96914 Project Location Description (e.g.,along The Best Management Practices Implementation and Erosion the south bank of stream/river Control Projects are located in the service area of South Lake between river miles or miles from Tahoe Public Utility District at operating sites throughout the Towns/intersection and/or address): City of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL Yes standards in accordance with the P Yes identifies the pollutants attainment date, and participate in N/A responsible for the loss of the development of future TMDLs. transparency and their originating sources.Three pollutants, fine sediment particles, nitrogen, and phosphorus are responsible for the transparency impairment of Lake Tahoe and these three pollutants enter the lake from diverse sources.This project will reduce/eliminate pollutants from entering the lake from these sources. Project Template Page 2 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project identifies options 17 projects and implementing measures such as r Yes for reducing pollutant loads 14 sites identified stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A to Lake Tahoe from the major control/restoration to meet Water fine sediment particle and Quality Objectives(WQOs)for nutrient sources. BMP's receiving water bodies established in provide pollutant load the Basin Plan within the planning reduction to Lake Tahoe. horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems FV_ Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, The types of improvements wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes that are to be incorporated to re-establish natural water filtering into the Project include Local N/A restoration of natural flow processes. paths, floodplains and wetlands. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F7 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and F N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Fy-' Y Erosion Control and Best es caused by existing and new Management Practices help development. F N/A to minimize impacts of new and existing developments Project Template Page 4 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among STPUD has formed a public multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes and technical advisory Region for information exchange. committee to assist in the N/A review and developments of the project. IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, r Yes protection and restoration needs to r N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that The types of improvements reduce flood risk. FV_ Yes that are most likely to be r N/A incorporated into the Project include, local source controls to minimize sediment and nutrient mobilization, local hydrologic controls to minimize runoff and maximize infiltration, and local restoration of natural flow paths, floodplains and wetlands IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. This project address water water quality,water supply, Yes quality issues and erosion groundwater recharge,flood N/A problems.The improvements management) in local and regional control and minimize runoff planning efforts and support efforts and sediment and nutrient to continue improving the science. mobilization. Restoration of natural flow paths, floodplains and wetlands are also incorporated into this project. Project Template Page 5 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A Yes, South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community and the project is located in this community. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. r N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A climate change'. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand JIL Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r- Yes W No Urban Water Use Efficiency F Yes r- No BMP/Erosion Control Projects help to increase urban water use efficiency by minimizing irrigation water use. Conveyance- Regional/ local FF- Yes F7 No Project Template Page 7 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? System Reoperation F_ Yes FV_ No Water Transfers F_ Yes FV_ No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes F_ No Desalination F_ Yes Fv- No Precipitation Enhancement No Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes Fv- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F_ Yes Fv- No Matching Water Quality to Use F_ Yes Fv- No Pollution Prevention r Yes F_ No This program will help minimize and control runoff and maximize infiltration Salt and Salinity Management Yes FV_ No Urban Runoff Management r Yes F_ No BMP's help to control urban runoff Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes Fy_' No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes P07 No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration R Yes F No The BMP/Erosion controls of this project benefit and restore the water quality of Lake Tahoe. Forest Management F_ Yes F4_0 No Land Use Planning and Management F_ Yes FV_ No Recharge Areas Protection F_ Yes FY-1 No Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes F4_0 No Watershed Management F_ Yes FV_ No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management Fy-' Yes F_ No BMP/Erosion Control help reduce and control runoff. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 9 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 0 50000 10000 60000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) 0 0 b.Can the Project be phased? Yes F No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 STPUD plans on 30,000 0 implementing the BMP's on 9 of the 17 projects on 13 sites Phase 2 30,000 STPUD plans on implementing the BMP's on 9 of the 17 projects on 13 sites Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project STPUD Capitol 10000 cost Improvement Funding d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs STPUD General Funds will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Planning documents planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes %0 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if BMP implementation on the 13 existing sites the project is not funded. (300 words or less) would be postponed indefinitely without funding. This would impact the contribution of this project Project Template Page 10 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM to the Lake Tahoe TMDL> 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and XF Yes 06/08 06/13 Evaluation F No F N/A b. Final Design X F Yes 06/12 06/13 F F No F N/A c. Environmental XF Yes 06/12 06/13 Documentation F (CEQA/NEPA) F No F N/A d. Permitting F Yes Permitting would occur 05/18 10/18 as each of the 17 projects X X� No were implemented as F N/A part of the project. e. Construction F Yes The 17 projects, 05/18 10/21 Contracting F depending upon funding, X XF No would be grouped or phased and contracted to F N/A a single operator to save on implementation costs. The project would need to be bid and awarded. Project Template Page 11 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. Construction F- Yes This phase would be the 05/18 10/21 Implementation actual implementation of X XF No the Best Management F N/A Practices on the 17 sites, either in groups as phased projects, or all on one contract, depending upon funding availability. Provide explanation if more All final design and environmental documentation has been completed than one project stage is on this project, however, project implementation would consist of checked as current status three stages: permitting, contracting and implementation. Project Template Page 12 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed The planning and engineering design project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General will follow the guidelines provided in Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat the guidance document Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) "Formulating and Evaluating Alternative for Water Quality Improvement Projects,July 2004", utilized by the Storm Water Quality Improvement Committee (SWQIC) and CTC. BMP's are mandated by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) and are included in the Basin wide Environmental Improvement Program document available at www.trpa.org. b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Provide explanation if more than feasibility of this project one project stage is checked as current status All final design and environmental documentation has been completed on this project, however, project implementation would consist of three stages: permitting, contracting and implementation. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The focus of Heyvaert's applied research has been conducted) of the proposed project in research program investigates 300 words or less. sediment and nutrient removal processes by stormwater management techniques,which are known as best management practices (BMPs). BMPs in the Lake Tahoe basin range from constructed wetlands to highway sediment capture and nutrient removal structures. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes F No X F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': Project Template Page 13 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management XF Yes G No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? X❑Yes G No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements X❑Yes G No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", G Yes G No X❑ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No X❑ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes G No X F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the XF Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the G Yes G No X G N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 14 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Raina Blasser Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive,South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating Landowners and managers of the water and sewer crossings Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders will be incorporated in project design. Is your agency/organization Yes. committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Sewer Crossings Condition Assessment, Improvements Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater FV_ Restoration F Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The District's facilities (both water and sewer lines) cross (Briefly describe the project, in 300 various creeks in over 80 locations. Because of the potential words or less) impact to the waterways and surrounding environment, these locations have additional risk and higher consequence if they were to fail.This project's purpose is to catalog and assess the sewer crossings in the District's service area, develop potential improvements to lower risk, and prioritize the projects for implementation. This project will provide the District with valuable information to focus rehabilitation efforts, maintain continual service and reduce the need for reactionary maintenance. It includes an analysis of existing conditions at the locations where sewer lines cross beneath streams and waterways in the District's service area, development and analysis of restoration options, and development of an initial restoration design.The project consists of repair or removal and replacement of aging facilities.This project helps to achieve high priority soil erosion control and water quality improvement needs under the EIP. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 8 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes,the TRPA EIP lists SEZ Restoration at specific sites Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? throughout the Tahoe Basin and this site will contribute to If so provide description. that effort. Political Support—List related MOUs, This project supports the goals of the TRPA EIP. agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: . •- • - Latitude: 38.922139 Longitude: -119.969428 Project Location Description (e.g.,along Projects are located in the service area of South Lake Tahoe the south bank of stream/river Public Utility District at operating sites throughout the City of between river miles or miles from South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Tahoe Regional Planning standards in accordance with the FV Yes Agency's Environmental attainment date, and participate in F N/A Improvement Program the development of future TMDLs. document lists Stream Environment Zone restoration as an important element in implementing the Lake Tahoe TMDL. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project will help reduce implementing measures such as r Yes pollutant loads by providing stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A high priority soil erosion control/restoration to meet Water control and water quality Quality Objectives(WQOs)for improvements. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water With this project the District supplied by public water systems r Yes intends to prevent the continues to meet Federal and State F N/A discharge of any hazardous standards. substance into waters of the state and provide continual service of drinking water. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, The project's design plans wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes will include reconstruction of to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A SEZ, where deemed processes. appropriate and necessary. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or The project will consist of replace infrastructure for reliable P Yes repair or removal and collection,treatment and disposal of F N/A replacement of aging facilities wastewater. at water and sewer crossings within the District's operating area. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. N-1 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor F_ Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F7 N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water This project helps to enhance bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes and restore water bodies and associated uplands to support healthy r N/A riparian areas. watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and F N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes Guidelines for project work at � caused by existing and new each site will include development. r N/A minimizing construction disturbance and ecosystem impacts. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Project information will be multiple jurisdictions within the Yes distributed amongst IRWM Region for information exchange. r N/A partners,the local community, and agencies and organizations Basin-wide. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, r Yes protection and restoration needs to r N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes FV N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood F N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A Yes, South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community and the project is located in this community. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. F7 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A climate change'. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F470 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local IO Yes F No The proposed project will insure the clean transport of water and wastewater along the water and sewer lines in the project areas. System Reoperation r Yes F7 No Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F_ Yes FV_ No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F_ Yes FV_ No Desalination F_ Yes P-0 No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes Fv- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F_ Yes P-0 No Matching Water Quality to Use F_ Yes Fv- No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Improvements at the water and sewer line crossings will prevent the discharge of any hazardous substances into waters of the state and will insure the uninterrupted service of drinking water. Salt and Salinity Management F_ Yes Fv- No Urban Runoff Management F_ Yes Fv- No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes FY-0 No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes P07 No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes F No The project includes restoration of SEZ within the project site, as necessary, as well as the removal of obsolete water facilities from stream crossings. Forest Management F Yes F No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes W No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes ry-1 No Water-dependent Recreation F Yes W No Watershed Management F_ Yes P-0 No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes P-1 No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 450,000 $150,000 600,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and 0 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F Yes I No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 100,000 0 Development of planning documents Phase 2 200,000 0 Construction implementation; phase one Phase 3 300,000 0 Construction implementation, phase two Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project STPUD Capital $150,000 cost Improvement Funding d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs STPUD General Funds will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Project cost based on planning documents. planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes v No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Without project funding,the repair or removal and the project is not funded. (300 words or less) replacement of aging infrastructure at sewer crossings in the District's service area will be delayed. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants: Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes 5/2018 8/2018 Evaluation r No F F N/A CURRENT STAGE b. Final Design F Yes r No 8/2018 10/2018 F F N/A c. Environmental F Yes WO No 10/2018 3/2019 Documentation (CEQA/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting F Yes r No 10/2018 3/2019 F F N/A e. Construction F Yes 10/2018 3/2019 Contracting � No F F N/A f. Construction F Yes 5/2019 10/2021 Implementation � NO F F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed TRPA EIP; Lahontan Basin Plan, Lake project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Tahoe TMDL Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the TRPA Environmental Improvement feasibility of this project Program (EIP) lists several significant studies regarding the importance of restoration within stream environment zones. They are available at the TRPA website: www.trpa.org c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes ,;i No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? Yes 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F7 Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F No F N/A (CWC§525) Yes 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", 17- Yes F No do you intend to comply prior to receiving project N/A funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No 12/31/12)? N/A 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No to receiving project funding? � N/A Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the F No F N/A subject basin? Yes Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No W N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Raina Blasser Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone(###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and California Tahoe Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Conservancy Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Iroquois Pond SEZ Restorations Project Category x Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control F- Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description A preliminary plan was completed by Northwest Hydraulic (Briefly describe the project, in Consultants. It includes an analysis of existing conditions at the 300 words or less) Iroquois Pond site, development and analysis of restoration options, and development of an initial restoration design.The project consists of removal of aging facilities and SEZ restoration of the Iroquois Pond site.This project helps to achieve high priority soil erosion control and water quality improvement needs under the EIP. The preliminary design includes removal of the dam and reconstruction of about 90 feet of stream channel through the pond area. The stream channel is proposed for construction at an average gradient of about 8%, and will include fabric encapsulated soil banks. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 9 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes,the TRPA EIP lists SEZ Restoration at specific sites throughout the a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Tahoe Basin and this site will contribute to that effort. EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related TRPA and CTC are supportive of the project. MOUs,agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 38.84833 Longitude: -119.99470 Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 -Meet approved TMDL The Tahoe Regional Planning 90 feet of stream standards in accordance with the F,/- Yes Agency's Environmental channel attainment date, and participate in F_ N/A Improvement Program restoration and the development of future TMDLs. document lists Stream dam removal Environment Zone restoration as an important element in implementing the Lake Tahoe TMDL. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project helps reduce -- implementing measures such as Fv- Yes pollutant loads by providing stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ N/A high priority soil erosion control/restoration to meet Water control and water quality Quality Objectives(WQOs)for improvements. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate W N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State Fv- N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, The projects design plans -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas W Yes include removal of the dam to re-establish natural water filtering F N/A and reconstruction of about processes. 90 ft of stream channel through the pond area. Restoration of most of the pond area (about 7,00 sf) as functional SEZ. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of I;_0' N/A wastewater. WS1 -Provide water supply to meet _ -- -- projected demands for a 20-year I Yes planning horizon. F%0_ N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably Yes supply water. F WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. Fy-' N/A GWM1 -Maintain and monitor -- -- F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. Fy-' N/A GWM2 -Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for F%0_ N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 -Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. f Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 -Enhance and restore water This project helps to enhance -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and W Yes and restore water bodies and associated uplands to support healthy F N/A riparian areas. It will also watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife help achieve high priority soil and plant habitats. erosion control and water quality improvement needs. ER2 -Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and F%0_ N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4-Minimize ecosystem impacts The restoration of the site -- caused by existing and new Yes includes maintaining the development. F N/A existing alignment downstream because it maintains the widest band of downstream SEZ and minimizes construction disturbance and ecosystem impacts.The removal of the obsolete water treatment facilities will repair impacts of development. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as P/ N/A supported by current and future watershed science. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Both the TRPA and CTC are -- multiple jurisdictions within the W Yes supportive of the project. Region for information exchange. F N/A Both the TRPA and CTC specifically requested that STPUD include the Iroquois Pond SEZ Restoration Project as a component of the larger STPUD Comprehensive Erosion Control Project. IWM3 - Increase public education and This project promotes public -- awareness of watershed functions, F,/- Yes education and awareness of protection and restoration needs to F N/A SEZ values. encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that _ -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes F%O- N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, I_ Yes groundwater recharge,flood N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in I_ Yes order to improve coordination with PO N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F%O- N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F- N/A Yes,South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community and the project is located in this community. c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. F%70 N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F%70 N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F,-O N/A -- emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F%-O N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r- Yes Fv- No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes W No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local r Yes Fv- No -- System Reoperation F Yes Fv- No -- Water Transfers r Yes F%-' No -- Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes F%_0 No -- Desalination r Yes r No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes Fv- No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes Fv- No -- Surface Storage--Regional/Local F Yes IV No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes FV_ No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes FV_ No Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes r No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes r No The project would reduce the nutrient load into the stream by restoring natural habitat. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes Fv- No -- Urban Runoff Management r Yes F%O- No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes I;_O� No -' Economic Incentives(Loans, Grants,and r Yes F%O- No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes r No The project includes 90 feet of stream restoration, as well as the removal of obsolete water treatment facilities from the stream environment zone. Forest Management r Yes FV_ No -- Land Use Planning and Management FV_ Yes F No -- Recharge Areas Protection r Yes FV_ No -- Water-dependent Recreation r Yes Fv- No -- Watershed Management r Yes FV_ No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes Fv- No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage-CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a. Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 350,000 $$- 0 350,000 OR x DAC 2. Annual Operations and $17,040 0 0 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes F-0 No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 350,000 0 -- Phase 2 0 0 -- Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs STPUD General Funds will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Planning documents planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The restoration of Iroquois Pond through the the project is not funded. (300 words or less) removal of the water treatment facility and subsequent restoration of the site would not occur without funding. Therefore,the resultant benefits of lessening polutant loads and contributing to the implementation of the Lake Tahoe TMDL would not occur. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Checkthe Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes -- 7/1/2009 6/1/2010 Evaluation F_ F No r b. Final Design W Yes -- 7/1/2009 6/1/2010 r F_ No F- c. Environmental IW Yes -- 7/1/2009 2/1/2010 Documentation r r No (CEQA/NEPA) r d. Permitting F_ Yes Permitting will occur 5/1/2018 10/1/2018 WO No when project is ready to be implemented. r e. Construction r Yes Construction will need to 5/1/2018 10/1/2018 Contracting W r No be bid and awarded. F f. Construction F Yes Full implementation of 5/1/2019 10/1/2019 Implementation 97 r No the project will occur when funding is secured. r The project cannot be N/A phased. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is This project has been evaluated and designed, but will still need checked as current status permitting, construction contracting and implementation when a funding source has been identified. Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed TRPA EIP; Lahontan Basin Plan, Lake project is consistent with or supported by(e.g.General Tahoe TMDL Plans, UWMPs,GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the TRPA Environmental Improvement feasibility of this project Program (EIP) lists several significant studies regarding the importance of restoration within stream environment zones. They are available at the TRPA website: www.trpa.org c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. r Yes Fv- No F- N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques,etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management R-0 Yes r No F- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? r Yes F- No F- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements W Yes r No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", r Yes F- No Fv- N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due r Yes F- No F%-O N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior r Yes F- No Fv- N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the R/- Yes F- No F- N/A subject basin? Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No WO N/A grant submittal date? 1. Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Tahoe Resource Conservation District Name of Primary Contact Nicole Cartwright Name of Secondary Contact Mollie Hurt Mailing Address 870 Emerald Bay Road, Suite#108 E-mail ncartwright@tahoercd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-1501 ext 102 Other Cooperating Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, California Department of Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Parks and Recreation, California Tahoe Conservancy,Town of Truckee, El Dorado County, Nevada County, Sierra County, Placer County,Alpine County,Truckee River Watershed Council, Private sector,Truckee Meadows Water Authority, and NV Division of Wildlife Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title AIS Prevention, Control, and Monitoring Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater r Restoration F Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) pose an ever-increasing threat (Briefly describe the project, in 300 to the health of our Nation's and region's ecosystems, and in words or less) turn can have a direct negative effect on local economies. Thousands of AIS have been dispersed or transplanted across the globe by humans. These species arrive in the ballast or on the hulls of ships,through the movement of shellfish and bait, by the opening of new channels or canals,through intentional release, and other vectors. Much of the ongoing spread of AIS to inland waters throughout North America can be attributed to the overland movement of trailered watercraft. Additionally, spread of AIS can occur by way of fishing gear such as footwear, bait and tackle equipment. Once established,they can change ecosystems, reduce native biodiversity and impact local economies. This regional project will implement 3 critical components of Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) measures. Prevention includes watercraft inspection; Control includes removal of existing AIS; and Monitoring includes status and trend detections of expanding or new infestations.All components include education and outreach.These programs and projects are implemented by a diverse partnership of entities from federal, state and local government, private citizens and Tahoe Sierra IRWM business, and nonprofit organizations. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 3 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes, EIP for attainment of a variety of environmental Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? thresholds, including water quality,fisheries and wildlife and If so provide description. recreation. Political Support—List related MOUs, Lake Tahoe AIS Management Plan, Lake Tahoe AIS agreements or TACs currently in place. Coordination Committee Charter, Lake Tahoe AIS Implementation Plan,TRPA Regional Plan Update;Truckee Regional AIS Prevention Program MOU Project Location: Latitude: 38.91605 Longitude: -120.00876 Project Location Description (e.g.,along the south bank of stream/river Throughout entire Tahoe Sierra IRWM Region. between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in F%0_ N/A the development of future TMDLs. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Removing aquatic invasive Acres of aquatic implementing measures such as r Yes plants decreases invasive plants stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A sedimentation and removed control/restoration to meet Water associated nutrient loads. Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F%0_ N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State Fv- N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering F_ N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of Fv- N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. Fv- N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F_ Yes supply water. Fv- N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. Fv- N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. FV— N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural P0- N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Preventing and controlling Matrix of AIS bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes AIS supports healthy prevented,#of associated uplands to support healthy F N/A watersheds by decreasing inspections, and watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife degradation associated with acres of AIS and plant habitats. AIS infestations removed ER2 - Develop and implement Watercraft inspections and Matrix of AIS programs to prevent the spread of F Yes decontaminations prevent detected and existing invasive species and F N/A the spread of AIS and prevented,#of colonization of potential future continued monitoring detects inspections, and invasive species. those infestations to be acres of AIS treated and controlled removed ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and Fv- N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts r Yes Controlling AIS in existing Matrix of AIS caused by existing and new marinas reduces the spread detections and development. F N/A of AIS species from those acres of AIS controlled sources Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as P'_ N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This program is coordinated Description of multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes through the collaboration of collaborative Region for information exchange. F N/A multiple jurisdictions to actions better share resources and coordinated information,standardize methods for prevention, among control and data collection. jurisdictions IWM3 - Increase public education and Project contains an # and awareness of watershed functions, r Yes education/outreach distribution of protection and restoration needs to F N/A component designed to press releases encourage stewardship by the public. increase public awareness of and outreach AIS control and monitoring materials,#of inspections IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes W N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood F%0_ N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with W N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community FV- N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. Fv- N/A c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. P0- N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of P1- N/A climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F%O- N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A Local economic benefits through not already mentioned elsewhere. protection of recreational resources 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes R/- No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F,/- No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F- Yes F%70 No System Reoperation F- Yes F,/- No Water Transfers F- Yes F%-O No Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F_ Yes %0 No Desalination r Yes F%_0 No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes P No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes W No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and f— Yes 1V_ No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F07 No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F No Pollution Prevention 1740 Yes F No Restore natural aquatic habitat through removal of AIS which can increase sedimentation and nutrient loads Salt and Salinity Management F Yes F No Urban Runoff Management F Yes F No IE ractice Resources Stewardshipgricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes F No conomic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes P No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes r No Restore natural aquatic habitats through prevention and control of AIS Forest Management F Yes F07 No Land Use Planning and Management W Yes 1— No Implementation of AIS prevention and control efforts may influence decisions related to land use planning and management Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F%_0 No Water-dependent Recreation ry-' Yes r No Implementation of AIS prevention and control is directly related to water- dependent recreation Watershed Management r Yes F No Implementation of AIS prevention, control and monitoring contributes to watershed management efforts Improve Flood Management MM Flood Risk Management F Yes F07 No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $2,000,000 $500,000 $100,000 $2,600,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $50,000 Maintenance (O8 b.Can the Project be phased? r yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $1,000,000 $25,000 AIS control and monitoring, education and outreach Phase 2 $1,000,000 $25,000 AIS control and monitoring, education and outreach Phase 3 $600,000 $0 Watercraft Inspections and education and outreach Phase 4 $0 $0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project User fees $500,000 cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding Lake Tahoe and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Restoration Act, Prop 1,Truckee River Fund, ANS Task Force e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M costs are related to control efforts.The will be financed for the 25-year planning sustainability of control efforts may require annual period for project implementation (not grant maintenance removal efforts.These costs will be funded). contributed by the landowner/manager f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Previous Implementation planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes %0 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Negative impacts from the establishment and the project is not funded. (300 words or less) spread of AIS would affect local economies from decreased recreational revenue, water suppliers from increased cost of delivery and purification, health and viability of native and desired fisheries, and health of watersheds on a region-wide scale. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants: Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes Evaluation F F No F N/A X b. Final Design F Yes F F No F N/A X c. Environmental F Yes Environmental 12/13 06/14 Documentation F X Documentation (CEQA/NEPA) F No completed for aquatic F N/A plant control projects within the Lake Tahoe Basin d. Permitting F Yes Permitting is required for 1/18 5/18 X X AIS control efforts F No F N/A e. Construction F Yes Contracting for AIS 3/18 5/18 Contracting X XF F No control efforts will be needed to implement F N/A treatment for control f. Construction F Yes implementing control 5/18 11/20 Implementation X F No efforts and monitoring F N/A Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed TRPA Regional Plan Update, Lake project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Tahoe AIS Management Plan, Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Finance Plan for Lake Tahoe AIS Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Implementation Plan for the Control feasibility of this project of Aquatic Invasive Species within Lake Tahoe: Marion E. Wittmann, Ph.D. and Sudeep Chandra, Ph. D. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much A significant collection of studies, research has been conducted) of the proposed project in reports and Management Plans have 300 words or less. been completed both nationally and locally on AIS introduction and establishment.The AIS Implementation Plan referenced above scientifically prioritizes sites for treatment in Lake Tahoe. New research feeds into on-going management decisions to best serve the protection of regional watersheds. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes F No X F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No X F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No X F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No X F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No X F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No X I7 N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior ❑Yes ❑ No X❑ N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the ❑Yes ❑ No X❑ N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the ❑Yes F No X F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Tahoe Resource Conservation District Name of Primary Contact Nicole Cartwright Name of Secondary Contact Andrea Buxton Mailing Address 870 Emerald Bay Rd., Suite 108 E-mail ncartwright@tahoercd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-1501 (111) Other Cooperating UC Davis, California Tahoe Conservancy, Lahontan Regional Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Water Board, US Forest Service, US Geological Society, South Tahoe PUD and the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Groundwater Discharge in Nearshore of Lake Tahoe Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater Fv- Restoration F_ Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description This study will explore relationships between groundwater (Briefly describe the project, in 300 discharge and nutrient content and the density of nuisance words or less) species, including aquatic invasive species (AIS) and periphyton, to help inform related planning activities. This project will use natural temperature fluctuations to quantify groundwater discharge at specific locations in the nearshore of Lake Tahoe. Vertical arrays of temperature loggers will be installed in the upper 2 meters of sediment at 10 to 20 monitoring sites. The loggers will record the temperature at 4 depths with hourly precision. Analytical models of heat transport and fluid flow will be used to calculate groundwater discharge rates. Groundwater samples will be collected at each site and analyzed for nutrient concentrations to estimate nutrient loading and isotope tracers to conduct a nutrient source analysis. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 of 3 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes, this project contributes to TMDL and EIP Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? implementation. This data will also support and compliment If so provide description. proposed nearshore status and trend monitoring by providing estimates of upland groundwater and nutrient input to areas with high AIS and periphyton densities. Political Support—List related MOUs, There is currently a Nearshore Agency Working Group agreements or TACs currently in place. (NAWG) and an AIS Coordinating Committee. Project Location: Tahoe Sierra IRWM Latitude: 120*W Longitude: 38* 56' N Project Location Description (e.g.,along Along the south shore of Lake Tahoe and select locations the south bank of stream/river along the west shore at 10-20 sample locations. between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL A minimum of 10 standards in accordance with the r Yes acknowledges infiltration of groundwater attainment date, and participate in urban runoff and fertilizers as monitoring sites N/A contributors of pollutants to along the development of future TMDLs. groundwater. This project will approximately 25 help identify groundwater miles of shoreline. nutrient sources and flux and their relationship to nuisance species including AIS and periphyton. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion FV_ N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality A minimum of 10 Collect and monitoring programs through r Yes groundwater monitoring sites analyze data from planning horizon, and coordinate along approximately 25 miles a minimum of 10 N/A of shoreline coordinated with groundwater annually throughout the Region. the NAWG and AIS TAC. monitoring sites along approximately 25 miles of shoreline. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State W N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering F%0_ N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of W N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. W N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. F%0_ N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. F%0_ N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F_ Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. W N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater This project will monitor 1-3 presentations protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater to identify to stakeholder groundwater, and advocate for nutrient sources and quantify groups in each improvements to impacted N/A nutrient loading from monitored groundwater quality through public groundwater to Lake Tahoe. watershed, as well as outreach education. to a minimum of 1000 residents/visitors. Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural FV_ N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy Fv- N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement This project helps develop a Collect and programs to prevent the spread of R Yes groundwater monitoring analyze data from existing invasive species and program that informs the a minimum of 10 colonization of potential future N/A relationship between groundwater groundwater and nearshore monitoring sites invasive species. AIS. along approximately 25 miles of shoreline. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and FV_ N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts r Yes caused by existing and new development. FV_ N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional This program will provide It is anticipated water-related planning activities r Yes opportunities for regional that partnerships within the planning horizon as collaboration and planning and/or MOUs with supported by current and future N/A related to groundwater the CTC, Water watershed science. resources. Board, TRPA, STPUD, USFS and the USGS would result. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This program is a regional t is anticipated multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes program and relies on that quarterly Region for information exchange. collaboration and information planning F N/A exchange between agencies meetings would involved in managing involve the CTC, groundwater resources. Water Board, TRPA, STPUD, USFS and the USGS. IWM3 - Increase public education and This program contains an An annual public awareness of watershed functions, r Yes educational/outreach newsletter and protection and restoration needs to component designed to make press release encourage stewardship by the public. N/A the public aware of would be widely groundwater's impacts to distributed in Lake Tahoe. print, on the Tahoe RCD website, and on social media. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes lV N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Groundwater monitoring An Annual water quality,water supply, F40- Yes activities contribute to a Summary of groundwater recharge,flood greater understanding of the Findings Report management) in local and regional r N/A hydrologic regime and how will be completed groundwater is affected by and vetted with planning efforts and support efforts climate change. partners. to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r- Yes order to improve coordination with Fv- N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community FV- N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F- N/A South Lake Tahoe is a designated a disadvantaged community. c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. F%O- N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F- N/A Water storage and availability will be climate change3. affected by climate change and this project helps to increase knowledge of groundwater resources and storage capacity in the Tahoe Basin. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas FV- N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A Project will help increase knowledge of not already mentioned elsewhere. groundwater pollutant contributions to Lake Tahoe as required by the Lake Tahoe TMDL. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes P/- No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F%O- No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes F%70 No System Reoperation F- Yes F,/- No Water Transfers F- Yes F%O- No Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F_ Yes %0 No Desalination r Yes F%_0 No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water Yes P No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local Yes W No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes FV_ No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F07 No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F No Pollution Prevention 1740 Yes F No Quantifying discharge and nutrient concentrations as well as analyzing for nutrient source at specific sites in the nearshore environment will help characterize groundwater quality and determine if nutrient sources can be mitigated. Salt and Salinity Management Yes F No Urban Runoff Management Yes F No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes V No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes %0 No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes i No Forest Management F Yes r No Land Use Planning and Management 1740 Yes F No Having a better understanding of groundwater nutrient sources and loads at specific sites in the nearshore will help agencies better identify management opportunities. This project could also evaluate effectiveness of land management activities on reducing loads. Recharge Areas Protection Yes F No Water-dependent Recreation Yes F No Watershed Management 1740 Yes F No This project will help identify watershed characteristics that influence nutrient and groundwater flux into Lake Tahoe. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes F07 No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $190,000 $47,500 $237,500 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? r Yes r No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $150,000 Planning plus implementation of project at 5-10 monitoring stations (1-2 watersheds) Phase 2 $87,500 5-10 more monitoring stations (2 additional watersheds) Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s)of funding for Project NA cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding NA and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs SB 630 funds could be used to continue monitoring will be financed for the 25-year planning activities at a reduced rate to continue to inform period for project implementation (not grant modeling efforts into the future. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Planning and implementation planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The proposed nearshore monitoring effort for status the project is not funded. (300 words or less) and trends (NAWG)will not have supporting data regarding groundwater contributions. Management actions for groundwater protection may be delayed. The Lake Tahoe TMDL may not be implemented as successfully without considering nutrient inputs from this source category. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes Planning including 04/19 12/22 Evaluation F development of No monitoring plan and site selection/instrumentation. F N/A b. Final Design F Yes F No F N/A c. Environmental F Yes Categorical Exemption for 03/19 04/19 Documentation F monitoring activities (CEQA/NEPA) No F N/A d. Permitting F Yes Lahontan Water Board 03/19 04/19 F No F N/A e. Construction F Yes Contracting F � No F N/A f. Construction F Yes Program implementation 03/19 12/22 Implementation F including groundwater No monitoring, data analysis and reporting, and F N/A outreach. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed California Water Plan, Lake Tahoe project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General TMDL, STPUD Groundwater Plans, UWMPs,GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Management Plan, the Lahontan Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Basin Plan, AIS Prevention Plan, Nearshore Resource Allocation Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Thodal 1997, Thomas et al. 2004, feasibility of this project Lake Tahoe TMDL Technical Report 2010 c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much This study will quantify groundwater research has been conducted) of the proposed project in and nutrient fluxes and sources at 300 words or less. specific sites. Sites with AIS and/or periphyton will be compared to nearby sites that lack AIS and/or periphyton, thus establishing a relationship between groundwater nutrient flux and AIS and/or periphyton if one exists. Analytical models of subsurface temperature fluctuations have been used to quantify site-specific groundwater discharge and recharge in numerous national studies. A review of the science and applications can be found in Anderson, 2005. Although many studies have used seasonal temperature fluctuations to estimate average yearly groundwater flux, modern equipment with high resolution (+/-0.2 degrees C) logged hourly has the potential to provide estimates of daily groundwater flux. This temporal resolution is expected to be important given the strong seasonal signal associated with the snowmelt dominated hydrologic regime in the Sierra. Nutrient concentration and source analysis will be used with the flux estimates to quantify nutrient loads and their sources entering the lake. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID F Yes NO F N/A techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management MN/A Plan and submitted to DWR? F Yes F No 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No MN/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements (CWC§525) F Yes F No N/A 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", do you intend to comply prior to receiving project F Yes F No N/A funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due 12/31/12)? F Yes F No N/A 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior L J/A to receiving project funding? F Yes F No Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the L Jes subject basin? F No F N/A 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No Fv_ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Tahoe Resource Conservation District—Tahoe RCD Name of Primary Contact Nicole Cartwright Name of Secondary Contact Mollie Hurt Mailing Address 870 Emerald Bay Road, Suite 108, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail ncartwright@tahoercd.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-1501 ext 111 Other Cooperating California Tahoe Conservancy,Tahoe Fund, California Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Department of Fish and Wildlife, US Forest Service Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Upper Truckee River-Johnson Meadow Restoration Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater r Restoration F%_0 Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description Tahoe RCD will conduct restoration activities necessary for (Briefly describe the project, in 300 improvements to Lake Tahoe water quality, habitat and words or less) public access for throughout Johnson Meadow, which encompasses Middle Reaches 1 and 2 of the Upper Truckee River(UTR).The UTR has been deemed the largest producer of stream-borne fine sediment in the Tahoe Basin and this restoration project will have significant benefits to lake clarity.The watershed has been substantially altered by anthropogenic activities over the last 150 years. Incompatible land uses and direct physical changes to the river have impacted the river's natural hydrologic processes and stability, resulting in increased sediment and nutrient loading to Lake Tahoe, contributing to its declining clarity. Wildlife habitat has been impaired due to these disturbances, and ecological restoration is one of the main goals of the coordinated effort to restore the UTR watershed.The wet meadow and willow riparian habitats found in Johnson Meadow are rare in the Sierra Nevada. The remaining wet meadow habitat exhibits degraded conditions,which adversely impact the associated fish and wildlife habitat values. Only through extensive restoration will this perennial stream habitat provide values similar to those preceding human impacts. This property is currently privately owned, however the Tahoe RCD anticipates Tahoe Sierra IRWM acquiring this property,with escrow closing in March 2018 with the opportunity to implement restoration and enhancements on both river reaches using the full extent of the meadow. Tahoe RCD expects a completed and comprehensive restoration plan including 75%design and environmental review activities necessary for future implementation of the restoration of the 206+acres of Johnson Meadow to be accomplished under other funding sources. Restoration and construction projects identified in the restoration plan will provide numerous benefits to Environmental Improvement Program thresholds, including water quality, soil conservation,vegetation, fisheries, wildlife, recreation and scenic resources. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Restoration will address Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? management measures to reduce nutrient discharges If so provide description. through watershed enhancements and stream bank stabilization.This project is assigned EIP number 01.02.01.0030 and is a part of the larger Upper Truckee River Restoration project. Political Support—List related MOUs, Upper Truckee River Watershed Advisory Group agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: N 38.91234' (project center) Longitude: W 119.99064° Project Location Description (e.g.,along Johnson Meadow is located in South Lake Tahoe, El Dorado the south bank of stream/river County, California. It is approximately 206+acres and middle between river miles or miles from reaches 1 and 2 of the Upper Truckee River. It is bordered on Towns/intersection and/or address): the south end by the airport, and spans north to US Hwy 50 bridge, to Barton Hospital on the west border, and Sierra Tract neighborhood to the east. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) Project Template Page 2 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in P'_ N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The reduction of priority An approximate implementing measures such as r Yes pollutant (fine sediments, reduction of 4.5 x stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A nitrogen, phosphorus) loads 1018 control/restoration to meet Water is the primary focus of the particles/year can Quality Objectives(WQOs)for project, as the main project be achieved receiving water bodies established in component is the elimination through the 5 the Basin Plan within the planning of sediment sources in the major UTR horizon. project area. restoration projects (this project is one of five). WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate lV N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State Fv- N/A standards. Project Template Page 3 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, The restored floodplain An approximate wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes processes will increase reduction of 4.5 x to re-establish natural water filtering F N/A sedimentation of fine 1018 processes. sediment as well as nutrient particles/year can uptake by floodplain be achieved vegetation.The load through the 5 reductions will assist with the major UTR clarity goal of Lake Tahoe and restoration the beneficial uses projects (this (recreation,fisheries, etc) project is one of associated with Tahoe's five). pristine clarity. Riparian and wetland beneficial uses will also likely be improved through improvements to floodplain vegetation and habitat associated with increased groundwater levels and improved alluvial processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of FV_ N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. W N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. P17 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. FV_ N/A Project Template Page 4 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM1- Maintain and monitor FV Yes Terrestrial habitat will be Restoring groundwater supply to assure future improved by increasing approximately reliability. r N/A groundwater levels and 206+acres of restoring wet meadow and meadow and riparian communities riparian habitat. throughout the meadow. GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 5 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water The UTR floodplain generally Restoring bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes occurs at elevations between approximately associated uplands to support healthy F N/A 6223 and 6500 feet.The 206+acres of watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife property contains significant meadow and and plant habitats. wildlife habitat, including riparian habitat. river, riparian, meadow, and upland habitat areas, and provides wildlife movement corridors that serve or could serve endangered and special interest species such as the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), northern goshawk(Accipiter gentilis), osprey (Pandion haliaetus), black bear(Ursus americanus), deer (Odocoileus hemionus), waterfowl, native fishes (Cottus beldingi, Prosopium williamsoni, Richardsonius egregious, Rhinichthys osculus, Siphateles bicolor, Catostomus tahoensis, Catostomus platyrhynchus) and trout(Oncorhynchus clarkia henshawi) among others. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and F N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. Project Template Page 6 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Neighboring stakeholder public and private landowners, r Yes involvement will include activities to manage forest health and F_ N/A education on conservation wildfire risks. activities to manage forest health, riparian integrity and sustainable public access. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F_ Yes caused by existing and new development. FV_ N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as FV_ N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project will work in multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes coordination with the Upper Region for information exchange. F_ N/A Truckee River Working Advisory Group and will also collaborate with a new set of stakeholders such as Barton Hospital,Tahoe Fund, and Lake Tahoe Sustainability Collaborative -Community Mobility Group. IWM3 - Increase public education and This project will encourage awareness of watershed functions, r Yes stewardship and involvement protection and restoration needs to F_ N/A of the general public through encourage stewardship by the public. creating awareness of a new public parcel and showing howcritical the protection of the meadow is to Lake Tahoe and the community. Project Template Page 7 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4- Promote activities that The Upper Truckee River is reduce flood risk. r Yes the largest watershed in the F N/A Tahoe Basin, draining over 56 square miles, and provides some of the most significant wet meadow floodplain habitat in the entire Sierra Nevada eco-region. The UTR watershed has been modified from its natural condition through human activities such as logging, livestock grazing, roads, golf courses, airport, and residential, commercial, and industrial development.Through restoration activities, flood risk will be reduced and the river will be restored more closely to its natural function and condition. Project Template Page 8 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. This project will be resilient water quality, water supply, r Yes to climate change through groundwater recharge, flood — N/A stream restoration. management) in local and regional Restoration will reestablish planning efforts and support efforts the structure and function of to continue improving the science. the ecosystem and floodplain in order to return the ecosystem as closely as possible to its natural conditions and functions prior to being altered. Ecosystems are naturally dynamic and it would not be possible to replicate the system to the exact pre- development and human- altered conditions. Rather, the restoration process reestablishes the general structure,function, and dynamic, self-sustaining behavior of the ecosystem. This will accommodate for extended dry periods, lower stream flows during dry months and higher stream flow during wet months.The project will mitigate climate change impacts by decreasing streambank erosion and improving water quality. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with W N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 9 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 10 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community W N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F N/A This project neighbors DACs and will allow for public land enhancement and access c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. W N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F N/A Restoration will reestablish the climate change3. structure and function of the ecosystem and floodplain in order to return the ecosystem as closely as possible to its natural conditions and functions prior to being altered. Ecosystems are naturally dynamic and it would not be possible to replicate the system to the exact pre- development and human-altered conditions. Rather,the restoration process reestablishes the general structure,function, and dynamic, self- sustaining behavior of the ecosystem. This will accommodate for extended dry periods, lower stream flows during dry months and higher stream flow during wet months.The project will mitigate climate change impacts by decreasing streambank erosion and improving water quality. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are FV_ N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. Project Template Page 11 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency Yes IO No Urban Water Use Efficiency F Yes r No prove perational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F Yes IO No System Reoperation F- Yes I- No Water Tra nsfe rs F- Yes No Increase Water Supply ' Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F Yes No Desalination F Yes F%-O No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes F%O- No Surface Storage -- Regional/Local Yes IO No Improve Water Qualit Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes F%O- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation Yes IO No Matching Water Quality to Use Yes IO No Pollution Prevention Yes IO No Salt and Salinity Management Yes IO No Urban Runoff Management Yes IO No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and 1— Yes No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration Yes No The Project will reduce fine sediment loading to Lake Tahoe. The project will also include watershed and ecosystem restoration through enhancement of natural floodplain function and SEZ rehabilitation. Forest Management l` Yes %0 No Project Template Page 12 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Land Use Planning and Management 7 Yes r No Recharge Areas Protection F_ Yes F%0_ No Water-dependent Recreation R Yes F_ No Lake Tahoe's economic vitality depends on lake clarity and water- dependent recreation. Restoring this section of the Upper Truckee River will preserve Lake Tahoe's world renowned clarity, which is vital to the region's recreation and economy. This project will also allow for greater public access to recreation on the UTR. Watershed Management Yes F_ No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management W Yes F No The Project will increase the floodplain's ability to retain fine sediment out of flows on their way to Lake Tahoe and allow for better flood management Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 13 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $3,000,000 $850,000 $8,315,000 $12,165,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $37,500 $37,500 $75,000 Maintenance (O8 b.Can the Project be phased? r Yes i No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $750,000 $30,000 Year 1—mobilization, initial excavation and fill Phase 2 $750,000 $30,000 Year 2—Continued excavation and fill Phase 3 $750,000 $10,000 Year 3—stream stabilization,vegetation Phase 4 $750,000 $5,000 Year 4—re-channelization, demobilization, Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Acquisition funding- $8,315,000 cost (CDFW,Tahoe Conservancy,Tahoe Fund) d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding SNPLMA Secondary, $1.77 million and certainty of the sources for Project cost. BOR—WaterSMART, NFWF, NPS 319 grant e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Tahoe RCD has general funding through tax dollars will be financed for the 25-year planning to contribute initially.Tahoe RCD is working with period for project implementation (not grant our partners at the Tahoe Conservancy on a long- funded). term Operations and Maintenance plan through our Joint Powers Authority. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, An engineer's estimate for the project based on a planning, bid, etc.) 75%design was developed in 2009(Upper Truckee River Middle Reaches 1 and 2 SEZ and Wildlife Enhancement Project—Joint NEPA/CEQA/TRPA Environmental Checklist, Draft). g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes V No h.Please describe what impact there may be if If the Project is not funded it may not be the project is not funded. (300 words or less) constructed, and the Upper Truckee River would continue to respond to past disturbances, resulting in continued stream bank erosion and reduced floodplain filtration processes. The progressive geomorphic adjustment along the Upper Truckee Project Template Page 14 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM River would occur primarily in the form of streambank erosion and widening,followed by streambed deposition in some upstream reaches. Load reductions associated with stream restoration projects are very difficult to quantify. Pplease note that the analysis below is only a best estimate and involves assumptions and information from the TMDL technical report. It has been estimated that 1.67 x 1019 particles/year of very fine sediment are contributed directly from stream bank erosion each year. Assuming that 60%of this comes from the UTR, and also assuming that a 45% reduction will be achieved through restoration activities, a reduction of 4.5 x 1018 particles/year can be achieved through the 5 major UTR restoration projects (projects identified in map by ownership). 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes Initial project design to July 2018 November Evaluation 75%was developed in 2018 v x No 2009.These designs will F N/A be updated prior to start of this project through Federal funding. b. Final Design F Yes F F No F N/A c. Environmental F Yes Preliminary July 2018 December Documentation administrative draft was 2018 (CEQA/NEPA) X NO created in 2009. F N/A Project Template Page 15 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Permitting F Yes F F No F N/A e. Construction r Yes Contracting F F No F N/A f. Construction r Yes Implementation F F No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 16 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed a)Tahoe Regional Planning Agency project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General (TRPA), Lake Tahoe Environmental Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Improvement Program, Stateline, NV Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) (1997) - Identifies priority restoration projects in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Upper Truckee River- Johnson Meadow Restoration Project, EIP project number 01.02.01.0030. b) Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Tahoe Sierra Integrated Regional Water Management Plan, South Tahoe Public Utility District, South Lake Tahoe, CA(revised 2014)-This Plan defines a clear vision for the management of water and associated resources in the Tahoe- Sierra Region. c)Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, Lake Tahoe Regional Plan,Stateline, NV(2013)The Regional Plan addresses specific measures related to water quality protection and improvement. d)TMDL Watershed, Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board,Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (1995, amendments through 2011) -The Basin Plan establishes beneficial uses and water quality objectives of both surface water bodies and groundwater basins and addresses other measures related to specific resource uses and development activities. e) U.S. Forest Service, Lake Tahoe Project Template Page 17 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Basin Management Unit Draft Revised Land and Resource Management Plan, South Lake Tahoe, CA (2013) -The Plan is focused on the management of aquatic, riparian, and meadow ecosystems. f)Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, Lake Tahoe 208 Water Quality Management Plan, Stateline, NV (2013)—The Plan describes the water quality management system in the entire Lake Tahoe Basin, the desired water quality outcomes, and the methods to achieve those outcomes. g)Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, Lake Tahoe Plan Area Statement 100 Truckee Marsh, Stateline, NV (amended 2002) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the California Water Boards and feasibility of this project Nevada Division of Environmental Protection. 2008(March). Lake Tahoe TMDL Pollutant Reduction Opportunity Report vol. 2.0. Available: <http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/la hontan/water issues/programs/tmd I/lake_tahoe/docs/presentations/pr o_report_v2.pdf>. Simon,A., E. Langendoen, R. Bingner, R. Wells,A. Heins, N. Jokay, and L.Jaramillo. 2003. Lake Tahoe Basin Framework Implementation Study:Sediment Loadings and Channel Erosion. Prepared by U.S. Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, National Sedimentation Laboratory for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Project Template Page 18 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Simon,A., N. Pollen-Bankhead,V. Mahacek, and E. Langendoen. 2009. Quantifying Reductions of mass failure frequency and sediment loadings from streambanks using toe protection and other means, United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association Vol.45 No. 1. Stubblefield,A. P., M. I. Escobar, and E.W. Larsen. 2006. Retention of Suspended Sediment and Phosphorus on a Freshwater Delta, South Lake Tahoe, California. Wetlands Ecology and Management 14(4):287-302. Tahoe Resource Conservation District(TRCD). 2003. Final Upper Truckee River Reclamation Project, Environmental Assessment, Feasibility Report and Conceptual Plans. January 2003. California Tahoe Conservancy,2009. The Upper Truckee River Middle Reaches 1 and 2 SEZ and Wildlife Enhancement Project Joint NEPA/CEQA/TRPA Environmental Document (Preliminary Draft). August 2009 c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The Tahoe Science Consortium— research has been conducted) of the proposed project in Science Synthesis Report,Technical 300 words or less. Report Number 8159 summarizes key findings for stream restoration as "The measured reach scale load reductions and floodplain specific sampling conducted on both Trout Creek and the Upper Truckee River provide undeniable evidence that long-term fine sediment particle load reductions can be achieved as a result of successful SEZ restoration Project Template Page 19 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM efforts." d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID F Yes NO F N/A techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? F_ Yes F No 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements (CWC§525) F Yes F No N/A 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", do you intend to comply prior to receiving project F Yes F No N/A funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due 12/31/12)? F Yes F No N/A 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior N/A to receiving project funding? F Yes F No Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the N/A subject basin? F Yes F No 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No Fv_ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 20 of 20 3/6/2018 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Dan Olsen Name of Secondary Contact Deverie Acuff Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee, CA 96161 E-mail dolsen@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2920 Other Cooperating Tahoe Resource Conservation District,Truckee River Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Watershed council,Truckee Donner Parks and Recreation District Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Aquatic Invasive Species/Watercraft Inspection Program Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater r Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) program within (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Truckee which includes a mandatory inspection program for words or less) motorized vessels, implementation of sticker program, education and outreach at key locations for non-motorized vehicles and recreational uses, partnerships with Tahoe Resource Conservation District and Truckee Donner Recreation and Parks District. The program is modeled after the program currently implemented in the Lake Tahoe basin Total number of projects 4 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes. Lake Tahoe AIS Coordination Committee and the Lake Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Tahoe Regional AIS Management Plan If so provide description. Political Support—List related MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Longitude: Project Location Description (e.g., along the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in W N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as F Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F7 N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F7 N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering F,71 N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F%70 N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. F%70 N/A Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F7 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. Fv- N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. P1 N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for F7 N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural P1 N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The introduction or Measurement of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes establishment of aquatic areas where associated uplands to support healthy r N/A invasive species is damaging species are watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife to the native environment. removed and and plant habitats. Established communities of restored with AIS can cause considerable native species. damage to water quality, water supply, recreation, and native species habitat and diversity which affects the economic and ecological health of the region and watershed. Prevention of the introduction and establishment of these species will help enhance and restore the watershed. Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement Prevention of the The number of programs to prevent the spread of Fy-' Yes introduction or boats existing invasive species and F N/A establishment of aquatic decontaminated colonization of potential future invasive species is damaging is measured. invasive species. to the native environment. Education and Established communities of outreach AIS can cause considerable programs damage to water quality, developed. water supply, recreation, and native species habitat and diversity which affects the economic and ecological health of the watershed ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. W N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The implementation of the Inter-agency water-related planning activities R Yes AIS program requires the agreements and within the planning horizon as F N/A coordination with adjacent coordination. supported by current and future programs and agencies. watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The implementation of the Inter-agency multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes AIS program requires the agreements and Region for information exchange. r N/A coordination with adjacent coordination. programs and agencies. IWM3 - Increase public education and Project includes project Number of awareness of watershed functions, Fy-' Yes outreach and education outreach events, protection and restoration needs to r N/A effort including signs, publications encourage stewardship by the public. handout materials, and a distributed, boats watercraft inspection inspected. program Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes F71 N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge,flood R N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r- N/A The Truckee River terminates in considerations. Pyramid Lake, located within the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Reservation. Prevention of aquatic species in the upper watershed will benefit the downstream community. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. P N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of P N/A climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are W N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F%70 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F%70 No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F- Yes FV- No System Reoperation F- Yes F%70 No Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F_ Yes F%70 No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F_ Yes F%70 No Desalination F_ Yes F%-O No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes F%70 No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes F%70 No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes F%-O No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F_ Yes F%-O No Matching Water Quality to Use F_ Yes F%70 No Pollution Prevention FV_ Yes F_ No Project prevents the introduction of invasive species which degrade water quality and benefits. Salt and Salinity Management F_ Yes F%70 No Urban Runoff Management F_ Yes F%-O No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes F%70 No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and FV_ Yes F No This program prevents the Water Pricing) establishment of AIS which has potential to degrade the environment, reducing the economic health of the community. Maintaining a healthy environment helps maintain a healthy tourist economy. Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F_ No This program prevents the establishment of AIS which has potential to degrade the environment, reducing the economic health of the community. Maintaining a healthy environment helps maintain a healthy tourist economy. Forest Management F_ Yes F%70 No Land Use Planning and Management F_ Yes F%-O No Recharge Areas Protection F_ Yes F%70 No Water-dependent Recreation F%O_ Yes F_ No This program prevents the establishment of AIS which has potential to degrade the environment, reducing the economic health of the community. Maintaining a healthy environment helps maintain a healthy Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? tourist economy. Watershed Management F Yes No This program prevents the establishment of AIS which has potential to degrade the environment, reducing the economic health of the community. Maintaining a healthy environment helps maintain a healthy tourist economy. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes F7 No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $45,000 $45,000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes F No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 Mandatory Inspection and certification of watercraft. Phase 2 Education and outreach material and signs. Phase 3 AIS eradication programs. Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Some funding is $25,000 annually cost generated by the boat inspection and decontamination fees. d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding General Fund and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Maintenance will continue to be performed by Town will be financed for the 25-year planning of Truckee Public Works/Street Maintenance period for project implementation (not grant Division Staff(funded through local funds)for signs. funded). Continued implementation of the inspection program will be funded by the inspection and permit fees. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Existing program at Lake Tahoe. planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes F40 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Watercraft inspections would be suspended. the project is not funded. (300 words or less) Establishment of AIS in the area will degrade the environment and have a detrimental economic impact on the tourist based economy and surface water supply. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes Truckee Regional AID 10/28/2013 Evaluation F F No Prevention Program AIS F N/A Vulnerability Study. b. Final Design F Yes F No N/A F N/A c. Environmental F_ Yes Documentation F F No (CEQA/NEPA) N/A F N/A d. Permitting F Yes F F No F N/A N/A e. Construction F Yes Installation of gate at 2019/2020 Contracting F F No Donner Lake Public Boat Ramp. F N/A f. Construction F Yes Installation of gate at 2019/2020 Implementation F F No Donner Lake Public Boat Ramp. F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee Regional AIS Prevention project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Program AIS Vulnerability Study, Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Town of Truckee Municipal Code Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Title 14 Aquatic Invasive Species. b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Truckee Regional AIS Prevention feasibility of this project Program AIS Vulnerability Study c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Water monitoring for AIS is research has been conducted) of the proposed project in conducted in Donner Lake one to 300 words or less. twice a year. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes F No F N/A N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? / 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No F N/A N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A N/A 12/31/12)? / 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No F N/A N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No N/A N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Jessica Thompson Name of Secondary Contact Mike Vaughan Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee, CA 96161 E-mail jhompson@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2938 Other Cooperating Truckee River Watershed Council Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Coldstream Road Open Bottom Culvert and Creek Restoration Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater 40 Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The Coldstream Road Open Bottom Culvert and Creek (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Restoration would remove the existing undersized words or less) culvert that contains Donner Creek and under Coldstream Road. This culvert is undersized, causing backwater conditions upstream and erosion downstream. The natural stream channel would be restored on the upstream and downstream sides of the open bottom culvert at the time the culvert is replaced. The new culvert would be designed to accommodate bike lanes or Class 1 trail and provide a link for the Truckee River Legacy Trail in the future, which connects Donner Lake State Park to the east side of Town. Total number of projects 4 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger TMDL Implementation,Truckee River Legacy Trail Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39°19'22.43"N Longitude: 120°13'37.79"W Project Location Description (e.g., along Culvert located at Donner Creek and Coldstream Road. the south bank of stream/river Tahoe Sierra IRWM between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Will reduce sediment load to Sediment Load standards in accordance with the Fv- Yes Donner Creek and ultimately Measurement the Truckee River by reducing attainment date, and participate in N/A existing erosion occurring in the development of future TMDLs. the stream. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Will reduce sediment load to Sediment Load implementing measures such as V Yes Donner Creek and ultimately Measurement stormwater LID retrofits, erosion N/A the Truckee River. Bridge control/restoration to meet Water will have a natural stream Quality Objectives (WQOs)for bottom, improve habitat and reduce erosion. Donner receiving water bodies established in Creek on either side of new the Basin Plan within the planning bridge will be revegetated horizon. and restored. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems Yes continues to meet Federal and State N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, The project will restore the Acres of restored wetlands, riparian and upland areas V Yes ecological function of the creek. Acres of to re-establish natural water filtering creek by replacing an restored wetland. I N/A existing culvert with an open Acres of processes. bottom culvert, allowing the increased natural stream channel to be floodplain. restored, and improving the floodplain. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of P1 N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. F71 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. FV_ N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. P1 N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for W N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The project will restore the Acres of riparian bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and FV_ Yes ecological function of the and wetland area associated uplands to support healthy creek by replacing an created. Acres of watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife N/A existing culvert with an open restored creek. and plant habitats. bottom culvert, allowing a Acres of restored natural stream channel to be wetland. Acres of restored. increased floodplain. Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and W N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and FV_ N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts r Yes The project will restore the Acres of restored caused by existing and new ecological function of the creek. Acres of development. F N/A creek by replacing an restored wetland. existing culvert with an open Acres of bottom culvert, allowing a increased natural stream channel to be floodplain. restored. Previous development impacted this area (construction of Hwy 80), and the road will be used more frequently with additional new development in the area. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. r N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and There is an opportunityfor Number of awareness of watershed functions, r Yes interpretive signage along the interpretive signs. protection and restoration needs to F N/A restoration project. encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that The existing culvert is New bridge sized reduce flood risk. r Yes undersized and high water for high water causes back water upstream conditions. F N/A and erosion downstream. A new open bottom culvert will reduce flood risk. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The existing culvert is New bridge sized water quality,water supply, r Yes undersized and high water for high water groundwater recharge,flood causes a back water conditions N/A condition upstream and (possibly management) in local and regional erosion downstream. A new increased with planning efforts and support efforts open bottom culvert will climate change). to continue improving the science. reduce flood risk and incorporate anticipated water elevations due to climate changes. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with W N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r- N/A Donner Creek drains to the Truckee considerations. River, which terminates in Pyramid Lake, located within the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Reservation. Reductions in sediment loads benefit this as well as the fisheries including Lahontan Cutthroat Trout. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r- N/A The Project is located within a DAC and will directly benefit the DAC. c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. R N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r- N/A The existing culvert is undersized climate change3. and occasionally causes a backwater condition upstream and erosion downstream. The new culvert will be sized to accommodate water elevations due to climate change. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F N/A The project would include the emissions (e.g.green technology). installation of vegetation that would help lower the water temperature to improve the cold water habitat of the creek. In addition, plants remove carbon dioxide from the air through carbon sequestration. Therefore, as the project will install a substantial amount of vegetation as a part of the restoration effort, it will help slow the growth of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r- N/A Provide flood protection and restores not already mentioned elsewhere. ecological function of creek. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes F%-O No Urban Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes F%-O No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F Yes F%-O No System Reoperation F Yes F%-O No Water Transfers r Yes FV_ No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes F%O_ No Desalination F Yes F%O_ No Precipitation Enhancement No Recycled Municipal Water r Yes FV_ No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes 170 No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes FV_ No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes FV No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F%O_ No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Salt and Salinity Management F Yes FV_ No Urban Runoff Management F4_0 Yes F_ No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes F%-O No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes F%-O No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F%O- Yes F_ No Restores ecological function of the creek. Forest Management F_ Yes F%-O No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes FV_ No Recharge Areas Protection 7 Yes F07 No Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes F No Project will provide visual access to Donner Creek. Watershed Management F_ Yes F_ No Improves flood plain,wetlands, and creek ecological function. Improve Flood Management Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Flood Risk Management Yes No Project will provide 100-year flood protection. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 2,000,000 $500,000 2,500,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and 10,000 10,000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes FV No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Teichert $248,000 cost Town of Truckee $252,000+ d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The existing culvert will remain as it is. the project is not funded. (300 words or less) 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes 30% Design and 10/2017 12/2018 Evaluation F Yes Environmental Evaluation X No is in progress F N/A b. Final Design F Yes F F No No F N/A c. Environmental F Yes Documentation No F F No (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F Yes F F No No F N/A e. Construction F Yes Contracting F F No No F N/A f. Construction F Yes Implementation F F No No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VII. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee General Plan, Middle project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Truckee River TMDL,Town of Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Truckee Trails and Bikeways Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Masterplan. b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Donner Basin Assessment (Truckee feasibility of this project River Watershed Council (TRWC)) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Donner Basin Assessment- research has been conducted) of the proposed project in culvert/stream restoration is an 300 words or less. opportunity d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) Yes 1.If so please describe The project will restore ecological function to the creek and wetlands. A new bridge would also allow room for a bike path and pedestrian connection. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? / 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No F N/A N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due r Yes F No F N/A N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No F N/A N/A Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No W N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Todd Landry Name of Secondary Contact Becky Bucar Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee, CA 96161 E-mail tlandry@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2904 Other Cooperating Truckee River Watershed council,Truckee Donner Recreation Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders and Park District,Truckee Development Associates Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Trout Creek Restoration Project Category r Water Supply/Wastewater 40 Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The Trout Creek Restoration Project would restore 5 reaches (Briefly describe the project, in 300 of Trout Creek between the Union Pacific Railroad property words or less) located immediately north of the Truckee River and the culvert that travels under Interstate 80 north of Jibboom Street. Reach 1 Phase 1, and Reaches 2 and 3 are complete. Construction of Reach 1 Phase 2 would remove the existing concrete channel that travels between Jibboom Street and School Street. Reaches 4 and 5 run primarily through land that is planned to be developed through the Railyard Master Plan. Development of this master plan has begun. Construction of these reaches (as well as Reach 1, Phase 2) is dependent on the availability of funding. A portion of Reach 5 restoration may get constructed as a part of the Town's Church Street Extension project, tentatively scheduled for 2019. Total number of projects 4 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger All phases are included in this template. Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related MOLIs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.33107 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Longitude: -120.18710 Project Location Description (e.g.,along Along Trout Creek between Union Pacific Railroad property the south bank of stream/river immediately north of the Truckee River and Interstate 80. between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Restoration of Trout Creek Sediment load. standards in accordance with the FV Yes will reduce sediment load to attainment date, and participate in F N/A the Truckee River. the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Restoration of Trout Creek Sediment load. implementing measures such as FV Yes will reduce sediment load to stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F N/A the Truckee River. control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F7 N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State W N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, The project will restore the Acres of restored wetlands, riparian and upland areas FV_ Yes ecological function of the creek. Acres of to re-establish natural water filtering creek. Wetlands will be wetland. N/A created in Reaches 4 and 5. processes. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of P1 N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. F71 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. FV_ N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. P1 N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for W N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Restore Trout Creek. Acres of creek bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and FV_ Yes restored. Acres of associated uplands to support healthy F N/A wetlands. Acres watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife of riparian area. and plant habitats. Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and W N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and FV_ N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as Fv N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. FV N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and This is an opportunity for Number of awareness of watershed functions, FV Yes interpretive signage along interpretive signs. protection and restoration needs to r N/A the restoration project. encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that The project will contain the Remapped reduce flood risk. F Yes 100-year flood flows. The floodplain. F N/A area currently floods during large storm events. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge,flood Fv N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with FV- N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r- N/A Trout Creek drains to the Truckee considerations. River,which terminates in Pyramid Lake, located within the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Reservation. Reductions in sediment loads benefit this as well as the fisheries including Lahontan Cutthroat Trout. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. W N/A c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. P N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of P N/A climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r- N/A The project would include installation emissions (e.g.green technology). of vegetation that would help lower the water temperature to improve the cold water habitat of the creek. In addition, plants, remove carbon dioxide from the air through carbon sequestration. Therefore, as the project will install a substantial amount of vegetation as a part of the restoration effort, it will help slow the growth of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Provide flood protection and restores not already mentioned elsewhere. ecological function of the creek. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency Yes V No Urban Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes F%-O No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F_ Yes W No System Reoperation F_ Yes No Water Transfers F_ Yes No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F_ Yes No Desalination F_ Yes No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes r No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation Yes No Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes No Pollution Prevention P-1 Yes F_ No Project will implement erosion control measures and will reduce sediment load to the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management F Yes F%-O No Urban Runoff Management FV_ Yes F_ No Project will include facilities to treat urban runoff. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship T Yes No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes * No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes No Restores ecological function of the creek. Forest Management F Yes * No Land Use Planning and Management r Yes No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes * No Water-dependent Recreation r Yes F_ No Project will provide visual access to Trout Creek. Watershed Management F_ Yes F%-O No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management 40 Yes No Project will provide 100-year flood protection. Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $13,000,000 $ $13,000,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $30,000 $30,000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? W Yes F No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $2,500,000 $10,000 Reach 1 Phase 2 Phase 2 $10,500,000 $20,000 Reaches 4 and 55 Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F_ Yes W No Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM h.Please describe what impact there may be if Project will not be constructed. the project is not funded. (300 words or less) 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F_ Yes Yes Evaluation XF F_ No F_ N/A b. Final Design F_ Yes 50%design is complete F F_ N for Reach 1, Phase 2. o X No 30%design is complete F_ N/A for Reaches 4 and 5. c. Environmental F Yes CEQA Mitigated Negative Documentation F Yes Declaration for Reaches 1 (CEQA/NEPA) X F_ No —3 is complete. F N/A d. Permitting F Yes Reach 1, Phase 1 and Yes Reaches 2 and 3 X No complete. F N/A e. Construction F Yes Reach 1, Phase 1 and Contracting F F No Reaches 2 and 3 No complete. F N/A f. Construction F Yes Reach 1, Phase 1 and Implementation F F_ No Reaches 2 and 3 No complete. F N/A Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status VII. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Town of Truckee General Plan, project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Railyard Master Plan. Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Trout Creek Restoration Design feasibility of this project Report. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The Trout Creek Restoration Design research has been conducted) of the proposed project in Report is a comprehensive report 300 words or less. that analyzed ecological function, floodplains,wetlands, history and biological species in the development of the 30%design for all reaches (1 through 5). The 30% design was prepared by Swanson Hydrology and Geomorphology, affirm that a firm that specializes in restoration design. A Trout Creek Restoration Project—Phase 1 Preliminary Design Report has also been prepared, as well as existing conditions wetland delineation. A Trout Creek Hydrology report was prepared to estimate design flows. Finally, Swanson used the HEC-RAS model to determine pre and post project 100-year floodplain. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) Yes 1.If so please describe The project will incorporate Low Impact Development design where possible. Also,vegetation that is removed as part of the construction can be salvaged and transplanted back into the final project. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? N/A 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? ❑Yes F No F N/A N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements ❑Yes ❑ No F N/A N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No F N/A N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A N/A 12/31/12)? / 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes ❑ No F N/A N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the ❑Yes F No F N/A subject basin? N/A 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Todd Landry Name of Secondary Contact Becky Bucar Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee,CA 96161 E-mail tlandry@townoftruckee.com Phone(###)###-#### 530-582-2904 Other Cooperating Truckee River Watershed Council, Placer County, Lahontan Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Regional Water Quality Control Board Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title West River Street Revitalization Project Category Water Supply/Wastewater 40 Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description This two-part project includes 1) the development of a the (Briefly describe the project, in 300 West River Street Parkway park providing recreational words or less) components and interpretive enhancements in Historic Downtown Truckee 2) overall revitalization of the Truckee River Corridor in Downtown Truckee.The park, located directly on the Truckee River,will include recreational components such as riverfront trail, plazas, picnic and barbecue areas, outdoor amphitheater, and shaded seating areas and will offer direct public access to the Truckee River on a site owned by the Town of Truckee.The Revitalization Project will revitalize underutilized lands, abate environmental degradation and redevelop the community's neglected waterfront consistent with the 2005 Truckee Downtown River Revitalization Strategy plan. Total number of projects 4 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 4 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes,the project will include BMP retrofits that will reduce Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? overall sediment levels in Truckee River,thereby working to If so provide description. attain TMDL goals. Political Support—List related MOUs, Stormwater Citizens Advisory Committee. agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.32549 Longitude: -120.18760 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description (e.g.,along Along the south side of West River Street, East River Street the south bank of stream/river and the north and south banks of the Truckee River. between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Project includes the Available standards in accordance with the F%0_ Yes implementation of BMPs monitoring data attainment date, and participate in and LIDs. Reducing along the � N/A pollutant loads to the Truckee River the development of future TMDLs. Truckee River is a can be requirement of the Phase 2 evaluated MS4 permit for Truckee before and after and the TMDL the project. requirements that are included in the permit. In addition to sediment, the proposed BMPs would also provide pollutant load reduction for other pollutants of concern, such as heavy metals and oil and grease. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The project will install Pre and post implementing measures such as F%0_ Yes BMPs and LID retrofits to water quality improve water quality and monitoring data, stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ N/A help meet WQOs of the square feet of control/restoration to meet Water Middle Truckee River. LID Quality Objectives (WQOs)for improvements. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3- Implement water quality Water quality monitoring programs through F%0_ Yes monitoring may planning horizon, and coordinate F_ N/A be part of the annually throughout the Region. project. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F_ Yes continues to meet Federal and State ki N/A standards. WQ5- Restore degraded streams, Implementation of the Square feet of wetlands, riparian and upland areas F40- Yes project BMPs and LID LID to re-establish natural water filtering improvements helps improvements F_ N/A improve the Truckee River and restored processes. watershed by reducing areas. sediment loads and other pollutants related to sediment. Implementation of LID improvements restores the natural filtering processes of the watershed. In addition, the project will include restoration of the riparian areas along the Truckee River. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F,0_ N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F_ Yes planning horizon. FV_ N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F_ Yes supply water. FV_ N/A WS3- Implement and promote water Square feet of LID Percent survival conservation measures and practices F%O- Yes improvements and rate of to meet state goals. F_ N/A restored areas. vegetation. GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F,0_ N/A Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2- Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for FO- N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3- Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural FO- N/A supply and environmental use). ER1- Enhance and restore water Project will install LID and Square feet of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F%O- Yes erosion control, which will LID associated uplands to support healthy improve water quality of improvements. watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife N/A the adjacent Truckee River, thereby improve the and plant habitats. ecosystems within and adjacent to the river. ER2- Develop and implement All revegetation work will Number of programs to prevent the spread of F%O- Yes require invasive weed invasive weeds existing invasive species and F N/A management. removed. colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3- Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and FO- N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts The redevelopment will Acreage of caused by existing and new Yes replace existing degraded redeveloped development. F N/A development along the land. Truckee River with development that improves the quality of wildlife and fishery habitat in the Truckee River and its tributaries as well as maintaining and protecting the ecological function of the river. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1-Conduct local and regional Effectiveness and success Pre and post water-related planning activities %0 Yes of the projects will water quality within the planning horizon as supported by post water monitoring data. supported by current and future N/A quality monitoring data. watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The redevelopment along Number of multiple jurisdictions within the %0 Yes the Truckee will require meetings. Region for information exchange. collaboration between F N/A Placer County, Town of Truckee, and Truckee River Watershed Council. IWM3- Increase public education and The park project will Number of awareness of watershed functions, F%0_ Yes include interpretive signs attendees and and improved access to at protection and restoration needs to F N/A the Truckee River. Public participants encourage stewardship by the public. the functions education may include hands-on projects that schools can help with and publicly available data. IWM4- Promote activities that Implementation of the Addition reduce flood risk. FV_ Yes projects increases the pervious surface natural function of the created. F N/A watershed through infiltration, thereby reducing peak flow and providing additional water storage. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water quality, groundwater Square feet of water quality,water supply, r Yes recharge, and flood LID, square feet groundwater recharge,flood management are all of restored management) in local and regional N/A improved with the project riparian areas, implementation and area of planning efforts and support efforts improved watershed additional to continue improving the science. function through the use of pervious BMPs and LID surfaces. improvements. Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with P0- N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F N/A The Truckee River terminates in considerations. Pyramid Lake, located within the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Reservation. Reductions in sediment loads benefit this community and the fisheries they depend on including Lahontan Cutthroat Trout. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. WO N/A c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. P0- N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F N/A Data collected helps identify trends climate change3. in water quality due to rainfall, erosion, flooding or other events. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F N/A BMP retrofits will include LID emissions (e.g.green technology). practices. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are W N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2.Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes F%-O No Urban Water Use Efficiency Yes 17- No Revegetation efforts will require drought resistant native plants. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F Yes F%O- No System Reoperation F Yes F%O- No Water Transfers F Yes F%O- No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes F- No Desalination F Yes F- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water r Yes F- No Surface Storage-- Regional/Local r Yes F- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and R Yes F- No Surface water sources are improved by Distribution the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation 17- Yes F%-O No Matching Water Quality to Use Yes 17- No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Pollution Prevention Fv-' Yes F- No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Salt and Salinity Management Fv-' Yes F- No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Urban Runoff Management Fv-' Yes F- No Surface water sources are improved by Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes F,/_ No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and FV_ Yes F_ No May include incentives for Water Pricing) redevelopment. Ecosystem Restoration FV_ Yes F_ No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Forest Management F_ Yes F,/_ No Land Use Planning and Management FV_ Yes F_ No Water monitoring data helps make decisions on project improvement locations and types. Data collected from pre and post projects helps direct future improvements and improve upon standard designs. Recharge Areas Protection FV_ Yes F_ No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Water-dependent Recreation FV_ Yes F_ No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Watershed Management FV_ Yes F_ No Surface water sources are improved by the implementation of BMPs and LID treatments that treat stormwater runoff. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management FV_ Yes F_ No BMP and LID implementation improves watershed infiltration, treatment and storage, which helps manage flood risk. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $7,200,000 $2,125,000 $13,000 $2,232,500 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $100,000 $100,000 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? FV_ Yes F_ No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $2,325,000 $10,000 West River Street Parkway Development Phase 2 $1,000,000 $5,000 Initial Incentive or Loan Program Phase 3 $19,000,000 $85,000 All other development Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding Development Impact and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Fees, General Fund, Private Developer Funding e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs General Fund through on-going operations costs for will be financed for the 25-year planning Public Works personnel. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Planning Costs. West River Street Parkway costs planning, bid,etc.) are based on itemized cost estimate. Other costs are conceptual and reflect order of magnitude costs only. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F_ Yes Fv- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Truckee River will continue to flow through the project is not funded. (300 words or less) I degraded area in Downtown Truckee. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants: Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes Truckee Downtown River 1/1/2005 12/1/2011 Evaluation F Yes Revitalization Strategy X No completed in 2005. F N/A Conceptual Plan for West River Street Parkway completed in 2011. b. Final Design F_ Yes F F No F_ N/A N/A c. Environmental Yes Documentation F No (CEQA/NEPA) F_ N/A N/A d. Permitting F Yes F F No 7 N/A N/A e. Construction F_ Yes Contracting F F No N/A F_ N/A f. Construction F Yes Implementation F (— No F N/A N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VII. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Middle Truckee River TMDL, NPDES project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Phase 2 General Permit,Town of Plans, UWMPs,GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Truckee General Plan. Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the 2005 Truckee Downtown River feasibility of this project Revitalization Strategy. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis (e.g. how much Significant research exists indicating research has been conducted) of the proposed project in that BMP and LID improvements 300 words or less. treat and retain stormwater. The project is in the conceptual stages and the scientific data will be developed as the designs develop. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F- Yes F- No F- N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques,etc.) Yes 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? N/A 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) N/A 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No F N/A N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project / funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A 12/31/12)? N/A 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? N/A Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No F N/A N/A subject basin? Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No F N/A N/A grant submittal date? 1. Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee Donner Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Steven Poncelet Name of Secondary Contact Brian Wright Mailing Address 11570 Donner Pass Road E-mail stevenponcelet@tdpud.org Phone (###)###-#### (530)550-8951 Other Cooperating Truckee River Watershed Council,Town of Truckee, Nevada Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders County, Placer County, Placer County Water Agency, Northstar Community Services District Is your agency/organization Yes but this project is not currently budgeted and the timeline committed to the project through for funding depends on outside funding. completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Martis Valley Groundwater Basin Planning& Restoration Study Project Category XF Water Supply/Wastewater Restoration F-0 Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The Martis Valley aquifer is the main water supply for the (Briefly describe the project, in 300 greater Truckee region. The US Bureau of Reclamation words or less) recently completed the Truckee River Basin study which included a state-of-the-art groundwater model for the Martis Valley groundwater basing and watershed. This study has identified key recharge areas for the basin which will help plan for and protect key recharge areas that have or may be damaged by human activity. This project will provide the opportunity to: protect and improve water quality; project the community water supply; manage groundwater for sustainable yield; contribute to ecosystem restoration; provide a model for applying science to solve water problems. The opportunity exists to conduct a study using existing LIDAR and other GIS data (slope, soil errodability,vegetation, and backcountry road density)to identify opportunities to mitigate the negative impacts to water supply,water quality, and erosion in key impacted recharge areas. Known impacted areas include the large, football field sized landing pads from historic logging activities along with the myriad of logging,fire, and OHV dirt roads. Tahoe Sierra IRWM The ability to identify key aquifer recharge areas that have been damaged by human activity would enable Truckee Donner PUD, along with the other groundwater users in the Martis Valley, to better understand and plan for adequate water supply and quality. The benefits would be directly to the Martis Valley aquifer, Martis Creek, Martis Dam, and the Truckee River. One outcome would be a list of potential restoration or mitigation projects. The benefits would include increased water supply, improved water quality, reduced erosion, and reduced storm water. This would also allow for improved communication and collaboration with the land-owners, responsible agencies, developers, and the restoration/environmental community. The project scope would be to conduct the study and produce a final report documenting the findings and creating a prioritized list of potential projects. This study and list of projects would then be used to try and secure funding for the most important and beneficial projects. Total number of projects 4 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 4 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger This project would enable improved water supply and water Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? quality and would also enable reduced erosion and If so provide description. corresponding benefit to storm water. Any future projects could be mitigations against new development. Political Support—List related MOUs, Stewardship of the Martis Valley aquifer is currently jointly agreements or TACs currently in place. shared between Truckee Donner PUD, Northstar CSD, and Placer County Water Agency and the three water purveyors collaboratively adopted the Martis Valley Ground Water Management Plan (GMP) and associated MOU's. The State of California passed the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014 (SGMA) requires that the three water agencies also work with the Town of Truckee, Placer County, and Nevada County of a new regulatory framework to management of the Martis Valley Groundwater Basin. Project Location: ' Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description (e.g., along The project area is the key recharge areas in the watershed the south bank of stream/river above the Maris Valley groundwater basin. The new between river miles or miles from recharge maps indicate that the key recharge areas around Towns/intersection and/or address): typically in the—500 foot elevation range and are centered mostly east and west of Highway 267 between Northstar and Brockway Summit. Project Template Page 2 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Identifying impacted standards in accordance with the FV Yes recharge areas and future attainment date, and participate in r NSA restoration projects would the development of future TMDLs. improve recharge and reduce erosion. WQ2-Reduce pollutant loads by Again, identifying highly Potential existing implementing measures such as r Yes impacted/compacted areas to restore 100's storm water LID retrofits, erosion F_ NSA will reduce erosion and or 1000's of acres control/restoration to meet Water improve water quality of impacted Quality Objectives(WQOs)for recharge areas. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate rv- N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water Again, identifying highly Potential existing supplied by public water systems r Yes impacted/compacted areas to restore 100's continues to meet Federal and State NSA will reduce erosion and or 1000's of acres standards. improve water quality. of impacted recharge areas. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, This study would focus Potential existing wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes mostly in upland areas where to restore 100's to re-establish natural water filtering r NSA the majority of the recharge or 1000's of acres processes. for the Maris Valley aquifer of impacted occurs. Again, identifying recharge areas. highly impacted/compacted areas will reduce erosion and improve water quality Project Template Page 3 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of W N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet Projects identified in this The Martis Valley projected demands for a 20-year r Yes study would improve aquifer provides planning horizon. r N/A recharge for the aquifer almost 100%of resulting in increased water the region's supply water. WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or Projects identified in this Restoring and/or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes study would improve protecting key supply water. F N/A recharge for the aquifer recharge areas resulting in increased water could off-set supply future water infrastructure capital expenditures. WS3 - Implement and promote water Improving water supply and The completed conservation measures and practices FV Yes educating the public about study and to meet state goals. F N/A the need to conserve water subsequent are key State goals that restoration would be accomplished by projects would this study help educate the community about our watershed. GWM1- Maintain and monitor FV Yes This study will help protect Potential existing groundwater supply to assure future key recharge areas in the to restore 100's reliability. F N/A future and restore areas or 1000's of acres impacted by human activity. of impacted recharge areas. Project Template Page 4 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater YES. The ability to overlay Project scope protection activities for high quality F Yes past and planned would include at groundwater, and advocate for x development/human least one public improvements to impacted F NSA activities over key recharge meeting and groundwater quality through public areas will enable proper plan multiple education. and protection for stakeholder groundwater supply. The meetings. study and subsequent projects would be shared with stakeholders and the community to further public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for YES. The goal of the study is Potential existing multiple uses (e.g. r Yes to identify key recharge areas to restore 100's municipal/industrial/agricultural x for protection and to restore or 1000's of acres supply and environmental use). r NSA impacted areas. The primary of impacted goal would be improved recharge areas. water supply but there are significant benefits to ER1 - Enhance and restore water Addressing highly compacted Potential existing bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes logging landing pads and a to restore 100's associated uplands to support healthy F NSA substantial network of dirt or 1000's of acres watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife roads would improve of impacted and plant habitats. recharge, reduce erosion, recharge areas. improve water quality, and help storm water. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of Yes existing invasive species and F N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. Project Template Page 5 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with The key recharge areas for Potential existing public and private landowners, r Yes the Martis Valley are either to restore 100's activities to manage forest health and F N/A owned by private interested, or 1000's of acres wildfire risks. the Federal government, or of impacted the local Land Trust. Public- recharge areas. Private-NGO partnerships will be necessary to implement restoration projects. A side benefit or restoration activities would be improved forest health and reduced wildfire risk. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Wo Yes Overlaying key recharge caused by existing and new areas with planned development. r N/A developments will allow entitlement agencies to plan for and project key recharge areas. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional This study would combine a This planning tool water-related planning activities Yes state-of-the-art groundwater could be used by within the planning horizon as r N/A model with world-class multiple water supported by current and future LIDAR/GIS technology agencies, watershed science. entitlement agencies, and other interests. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The study/planning area is Numerous multiple jurisdictions within the Yes covered by two counties, one interagency Region for information exchange. N/A Town,three public water collaboration and agencies, State & Federal public-private agencies, private land partnerships exist owners, and environmental in the region and interests. The watershed is this study would also one of the major sources help foster more. of water supply for the State of Nevada. Project Template Page 6 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and There will be a strong Project scope awareness of watershed functions, r Yes community and educational would include at protection and restoration needs to F N/A outreach component to this least one public encourage stewardship by the public. project and the primary focus meeting and is 'How does the watershed multiple work and what impacts do stakeholder human activity have?' meetings. Understanding this may change people's behavior and would encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that Improved recharge reduces reduce flood risk. W Yes storm water runoff and F N/A erosion both of which reduce flood risk. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The Truckee River Basin water quality,water supply, FV Yes Study projects climate groundwater recharge,flood N/A impacts to the Martis Valley management) in local and regional Groundwater basin through planning efforts and support efforts the end of the century. Part to continue improving the science. of this study would address how climate change might impact/change recharge areas. IWM6- Monitor water storage, All of the water in the Martis release and exchange activities in r Yes Valley Groundwater Basin order to improve coordination with r N/A (and in the Tahoe-Truckee regional planning. region) is governed by the Truckee River Operating Agreement (TROA)which is an agreement between two states and multiple stakeholders. Improving the understanding of aquifer recharge and human impacts will help overall coordination and regional planning since this is a shared resource. Project Template Page 7 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 8 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A One beneficiary of improved recharge considerations. in the Martis Valley is the Pyramid/Piute Tribe of Nevada which relies on Truckee River water for the environmental health of Pyramid Lake. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A X c. Environmental Justice'considerations. F- N/A X d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A See above. Improve recharge and climate change'. reduced environmental degradation will help the region adapt to climate change. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Restoration projects tend to reduce emissions (e.g.green technology). greenhouse gas emissions or improve carbon sequestration. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A This could be a model for other not already mentioned elsewhere. groundwater basins/watersheds. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes FV- No No Urban Water Use Efficiency Yes 1%0 No No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local Yes F No I Yes, Improves overall watershed performance Project Template Page 9 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? System Reoperation V Yes No Potential to restore damaged recharge areas and improve overall watershed performance and System Reoperation. Water Transfers F Yes F No Increase Water Supply Im Conjunctive Management& Groundwater Yes F- No Improves recharge by reducing storm water and erosion. Desalination Yes F No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water r Yes Fv- No Surface Storage-- Regional/Local r Yes Fy-' No improveater Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes F%-O No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F No Study would identify restoration opportunities in key recharge area improving water supply, water quality, and reducing storm water/erosion. Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Reduced erosion would improve water quality in Martis Creek, Martis Dam, and the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management Yes P No Urban Runoff Management r Yes No Improved recharge and reduced erosion helps with Urban Runoff Management Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship Yes No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration Yes No Study would identify Ecosystem Restoration opportunities in key recharge area improving water supply, water quality, and reducing storm water/erosion. Forest Management Yes No Almost all of the key recharge areas for the Martis Valley are forested and the study would help with Forest Management Land Use Planning and Management ry-' Yes I— No This study would identify key recharge areas that have either been impacted by past human activity or which are planned to be developed or used in the future. Understanding this is Project Template Page 10 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? critical for Land Use Planning and Management Recharge Areas Protection Yes F No The central theme of this study is Recharge Area Projection Water-dependent Recreation Yes fV No Watershed Management Yes No This study would identify key recharge areas that have either been impacted by past human activity or which are planned to be developed or used in the future. Understanding this is critical for Watershed Management. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management 140 Yes No Improved recharge and reduced storm water/erosion helps with Flood Risk Management. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 11 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $100,000 $25,000 $125,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes V No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding Martis Valley GMP $25,000 total and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Partners(TDPUD, NSCSD, PCWA) Rates e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs This is a Study. Future projects and funding would will be financed for the 25-year planning address this issue period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes %0 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Key recharge areas are currently not formally the project is not funded. (300 words or less) considered when evaluating watershed management, human activities, and future development. We know that some key recharge areas are already impacted by decades of logging and human activities and we are concerned that current and future planned growth/activities may further degrade the watershed performance as measured by recharge/water supply,water quality, erosion, and storm water. The United States Bureau of Reclamation,with support from the Martis Valley GMP partners, has spent over Project Template Page 12 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM $1,000,000 and counting to build the Martis Valley groundwater model and associated studies, including projections on the impacts of climate change. In addition,the Truckee Donner PUD, has state-of-the-art LIDAR/GIS systems that can identify things like slope%,vegetation,forest density,and road density. This study would combine/overlay this existing data, along with future growth/activities, on known key recharge areas to identify opportunities for restoration and to protect these areas in the future. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F- Yes Significant science has TBD TBD Evaluation XF F No X been completed to date and this study would F N/A combine this body of data/understanding to identify key aquifer recharge areas that could be restored or should be protected. b. Final Design F Yes Final output of this F F No project would be a x detailed report that F N/A would identify key recharge areas and produce a list of potential restoration projects along with an understand how future activities may impact aquifer recharge Project Template Page 13 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM and watershed performance. c. Environmental F Yes Would be done on a Documentation F F No project by project basis (CEQA/NEPA) that may result from this F N/A X study. d. Permitting F Yes Would be done on a F F No project by project basis that may result from this N/A X study. e. Construction F Yes Would be done on a Contracting F F No project by project basis that may result from this N/A X study. f. Construction F Yes Would be done on a Implementation F F No project by project basis that may result from this N/A X study. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 14 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Town of Truckee, Placer County, and project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Nevada County General Plans, Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Martis Valley Ground Water Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Management Plan,Truckee Donner PUD UWMP and Water System Master Plan, California Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014 b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Integrated Surface and Groundwater feasibility of this project Modeling of Martis Valley, California, for Assessment of Potential Climate Change Impacts on Basin-Scale Water Resources; Desert Research Institute and U.S. Geological Survey; April, 2015 California GAMA Special Study:: Climate Change Impacts to Recharge in a High-Elevation Groundwater Basin; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, California State University—East Bay, University of California Santa Barbara; February, 2014 Note: There are half a dozen previous studies conducted on the Martis Valley groundwater basin and aquifer. Note: Truckee Donner PUD manages the GIS infrastructure for numerous agencies in the greater Truckee area including Town of Truckee,Truckee Tahoe Airport District,Truckee Sanitary District, Tahoe Truckee Sanitation Agency, and Northstar Community Services District. This includes LIDAR data with 2" inch resolution and sophisticated GIS that includes above and below grade Project Template Page 15 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM infrastructure, property lines, zoning, etc... This shared resource enables the overlaying of the key recharge areas with past and planned activities. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much We know that some key recharge research has been conducted) of the proposed project in areas for the Martis Valley 300 words or less. groundwater basin are already impacted by decades of logging and human activities and we are concerned that current and future planned growth/activities may further degrade the watershed performance as measured by recharge/water supply,water quality, erosion, and storm water. The United States Bureau of Reclamation,with support from the Martis Valley GMP partners, has spent over$1,000,000 and counting to build the Martis Valley groundwater model and associated studies, including projections on the impacts of climate change. In addition,the Truckee Donner PUD, has state-of-the-art LIDAR/GIS systems that can identify things like slope%,vegetation, soil errodability, forest density, and road density. This study would combine/overlay this existing data, along with future growth/activities, on known key recharge areas to identify opportunities for restoration and to protect these areas in the future. All of the tools needed to complete this important work in the Martis Valley, due to the significant scientific studies over the last 5- years, exist today. This approach could also be a model for other watersheds/groundwater basins. Project Template Page 16 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. XF Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID — techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The use of state-of-the art e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management XF Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? — 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? XF Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements XF Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) — 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due ❑Yes F No ❑ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior ❑Yes F No ❑ N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the XF Yes ❑ No F N/A subject basin? — 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 17 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Eben Swain Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568,Truckee, CA 96162 E-mail eswain@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### (530)550-8760 Other Cooperating CA State Parks, Sierra Nevada Conservancy, Union Pacific Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Railroad Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Coldstream Canyon Watershed Restoration Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater FV_ Restoration F Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The goal of the Coldstream Canyon Watershed Restoration (Briefly describe the project, in 300 plan is to Implement projects in Coldstream Canyon that words or less) will restore hydrologic and ecosystem functionality. Extensive legacy impacts including railroad development, logging activities and an extensive dirt road network have degraded the watershed and diminished important ecosystem functions. Restoration opportunities were identified through the Coldstream Canyon Watershed Assessment (TRWC, 2007), and the Donner Basin Assessment (TRWC 2016). The objectives of the Coldstream Canyon project include: — Restore hydrologic connectivity along degraded roads — Restore geomorphic processes in stream channels, floodplain and wetland areas — Reduce flooding and alleviate hydrologic constriction in existing railroad culverts — Restore incised stream channels and enhance in- stream habitat complexity — Restore wetland habitat and riparian vegetation in historic gravel mining ponds — Improve forest health and reduce wildfire risk through conifer thinning Tahoe Sierra IRWM Total number of projects 15 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 5 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes—Truckee River Sediment TMDL(LRWQCB, 2008), Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River Coordinated Watershed If so provide description. Management Strategy(TRWC, 2014), Coldstream Canyon Watershed Assessment (TRWC, 2007), Donner Basin Assessment(TRWC 2016) Political Support—List related MOUs, Stakeholder Advisory Committee; project partner agreements or TACs currently in place. agreements, landowner agreements. Project Location: Latitude: 39.298044 Longitude: -120.256633 Project Location Description (e.g.,along The project sites are all located in the Coldstream Canyon the south bank of stream/river basin. The projects are located along the mainstem of Cold between river miles or miles from Creek and Emigrant Creek as well as within the upper and Towns/intersection and/or address): lower valleys of Coldstream Canyon. Projects will take place on CA State Park lands, USFS land and on Union Pacific Railroad property with collaboration from additional private property owners as needed. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The project helps meet Annual sediment standards in accordance with the F Yes TMDL standards by reducing load reduction attainment date, and participate in sediment loading to the of up to 200 N/A Truckee River.The Truckee the development of future TMDLs. River is 303(d) listed for tons/year excess sediment and a TMDL has been adopted (LRWQCB, 2008). Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The Coldstream Canyon Annual sediment implementing measures such as r Yes projects will decrease load reduction stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F N/A erosion through of up to 200 control/restoration to meet Water restoration. The Truckee tons/year Quality Objectives(WQOs)for River is 303(d) listed for receiving water bodies established in excess sediment. The the Basin Plan within the planning projects will help meet the horizon. WQO for turbidity in the Truckee River HU. WQ3 - Implement water quality There is active water quality Continuation of monitoring programs through r Yes monitoring along Coldstream water quality planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A creek through TRWC's monitoring annually throughout the Region. volunteer monitoring plan. program. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State I� N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Restoration actions will take These projects wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes place at several sites within will restore and to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A Coldstream Canyon, including enhance 14 acres processes. the mainstem of Cold Creek of wetland and associated tributaries. habitat. Riparian, wetland, and upland habitat would all The project will benefit. Incised reaches will address erosion be restored to improve along^2 miles of overbank flow and stream. infiltration. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F7 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Restoration of incised Protect and protection activities for high quality r Yes stream channels and gravel restore up to 14 groundwater, and advocate for mining areas will help to Acres of r N/A de l at hold water longer an improvements to impacted ho wetland groundwater quality through public increase floodplain habitat education. retention within wetland habitat areas. allowing for increased groundwater recharge GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural F N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Watershed function, wildlife Re-connect bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes habitat, and instream habitat floodplain associated uplands to support healthy F N/A will be restored through along—2 miles watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife implementation of the of stream and plant habitats. Coldstream Canyon projects. reducing instream erosion. Restore and enhance up to 14 acres of meadow/wetland habitat. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and F N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Projects will address conifer Reduce conifer public and private landowners, F Yes encroachment into wetland encroachment on activities to manage forest health and F N/A areas and aspen stands. up to 12 acres of wildfire risks. Thinning of overstocked degraded conifers will help reduce fire wetland habitat risk and improve forest health. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes Project implementation will 2 miles of habitat degraded caused by existing and new restore de g stream development. r_ N/A areas caused by restored and construction of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPR) and 14 acres associated infrastructure. wetlands restored IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The Coldstream Canyon Continue multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes project list was coordination Region for information exchange. N/A developed in collaboration among a with CA State Parks. We will minimum of also work with the Sierra two major Nevada Conservancy to landowners determine appropriate solutions and enhance communication amongst landowners. Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and We will increase education Two community awareness of watershed functions, r Yes and awareness through Presentations protection and restoration needs to r N/A community presentations, Three site tours encourage stewardship by the public. site tours, and community with 10 work days completed on participants our annual Truckee River Two years of Day event- a community Truckee River work day Day projects featuring 20 participants annually IWM4- Promote activities that Projects will address Develop solutions reduce flood risk. r Yes significant flooding issues to alleviate F N/A caused by development of flooding in UPR UPR infrastructure and will culvert system. help to alleviate flash flood Restore^2 miles events from occurring in the of incised stream watershed. channel. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The project will restore "2 miles of water quality,water supply, Fv Yes ecosystem and hydrologic stream and 14 groundwater recharge,flood r N/A functions, improving acres of management) in local and regional resilience to withstand wetlands planning efforts and support efforts impacts of climate change restored to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Watersheds that are more resilient climate change'. will be better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. Restoring ecosystem functionality within the Coldstream Canyon watershed would provide enormous benefit through better flood flow attenuation as precipitation shifts from snow to rain. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Improved hydrology will increase emissions (e.g.green technology). vegetation cover and vigor. After restoration,vegetation will sequester more soil carbon and uptake more greenhouse gases than prior to restoration. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Restoration planning and not already mentioned elsewhere. implementation will enhance recreation in Coldstream Canyon. Our project list includes cooperative planning with landowners to improve recreational access on their land in conjunction with restoration. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency Yes FV_ No Urban Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F_ Yes F No System Reoperation F_ Yes 17 No Water Transfers F Yes r No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes Fv- No Desalination Yes FV_ No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes FV_ No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes FY-1 No Improve Water Quality dft Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes FV_ No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes r No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes r No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No The Truckee River is listed as impaired for excess sediment. The project will reduce the sediment load to the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management F Yes Fy-' No Urban Runoff Management F Yes V No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes FV_ No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes Fv No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F No The project will result in improved ecosystem processes through restoring wetlands, stream channels, and denuded habitat areas. Forest Management F Yes ry-1 No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes W No Recharge Areas Protection W Yes F No The project will help to protect important groundwater recharge areas in the Coldstream Canyon watershed. Water-dependent Recreation V Yes F_ No Water quality in Cold Creek, Donner Creek and the Truckee River will Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? benefit from restoration of upstream areas. Watershed Management r Yes F_ No The Coldstream Canyon Assessment resulted in a Restoration Plan for effective watershed management. We are proposing to implement elements of the Restoration Plan. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management V Yes No Restoration actions will help to reduce the potential for flash flood events. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $1,650,000 $175,000 $1,825,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $250,000 Planning,design, and environmental compliance Phase 2 $1,400,000 Construction Phase 3 $175,000 Monitoring and Adaptive management Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Martis Fund $175,000 cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding Parks and Rec Bond and certainty of the sources for Project cost. —medium Proposition 1 Bond -medium e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The restoration work is designed to be self- will be financed for the 25-year planning sustaining; therefore, there should not be any period for project implementation (not grant additional maintenance costs. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Conceptual based on similar projects planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W1 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Degradation will continue in the Coldstream the project is not funded. (300 words or less) Canyon watershed resulting in water quality impacts,wetland and meadow loss, and increased upland runoff. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and 9 Yes The watershed 4/2007 Evaluation F F No assessment was F_ N/A completed in 2007 b. Final Design Yes Designs development will 5/2018 12/2018 F X No begin in 2018. F N/A c. Environmental F Yes CEQA will be completed 5/2018 12/2018 Documentation X No in 2018 (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F Yes No Permits will be obtained 5/2018 8/2019 F N/A R X prior to construction. e. Construction F Yes NO Construction may be 6/2019 10/2022 Contracting F phased F N/A f. Construction F Yes NO Construction may be 9/2019 10/2022 Implementation F phased F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River Sediment TMDL project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General (LRWQCB, 2008), Lahontan Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Basin Plan, Coordinated Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Watershed Management Strategy, updated project list (TRWC, 2014), Sierra Nevada Meadows Business Plan (NFWF, 2010). b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Coldstream Canyon Watershed feasibility of this project Assessment (TRWC, 2007), Donner Basin Assessment (TRWC, 2016) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much All projects were identified through research has been conducted) of the proposed project in a scientifically based watershed 300 words or less. assessment. Further detailed site- specific assessment and studies will be completed in support of the assessment. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The projects are designed to use native materials and balance cut/fill on-site, reducing the need to import or export and dispose of material. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? x 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No x F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) x 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project x funding Provide Explanation if necessary: Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No x F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No xF N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No x F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No F N/A grant submittal date? x 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Michele Prestowitz Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568 Truckee, CA 96162 E-mail mprestowitz@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 Other Cooperating Town of Truckee,Teichert, CA State Parks Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Donner Creek Confluence Floodplain Restoration Project Project Category F_ Water Supply/Wastewater P-1 Restoration F Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description This project site offers a unique opportunity to significantly (Briefly describe the project, in 300 improve the health of the Donner and Cold Creek words or less) confluence.The vacant structures and parking lot will be removed from the property southwest of the confluence and the floodplain lowered through grading. Donner Creek will be moved further south and given a healthier and more sinuous channel. The land southeast of the confluence will also be lowered to further broaden the stream corridor and provide a more frequently activated floodplain.The opportunity exists to implement this project as part of the Town ofTruckee's Coldstream Specific Plan (PC-1). The project would significantly broaden the active stream corridor and enhance floodplain connectivity for both Donner and Cold Creeks.The streams would have more capacity for natural physical processes, and would be better able to create and maintain habitat without human intervention. Aquatic and riparian habitat areas would be greatly improved.The project site would also enable greater sediment deposition and improve water quality. Total number of projects 14 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 13 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes—Truckee River Sediment TMDL(LRWQCB, 2008), Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River Coordinated Watershed If so provide description. Management Strategy (TRWC, 2014), Donner Basin Assessment(TRWC, 2016) Political Support—List related MOUs, Donner Lake Basin Assessment TAC,TRWC Projects and agreements or TACs currently in place. Assessments Committee Project Location: Latitude: 39.3232395 Longitude: -120.2238097 Project Location Description (e.g., along Immediately southeast and southwest of the Donner and the south bank of stream/river Cold Creek confluence. between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The project helps meet TMDL Reduce 75 tons of standards in accordance with the P Yes standards by reducing sediment attainment date, and participate in N/A sediment loading to the the development of future TMDLs. Truckee River. The Truckee River is 303(d) listed for excess sediment and a TMDL has been adopted (LRWQCB, 2008). WQ2— Reduce pollutant loads by The project involves restoring Reduce 75 tons of implementing measures such as Yes treating erosive dirt roads in sediment stormwater LID retrofits, erosion N/A the Truckee River watershed. control/restoration to meet Water The Truckee River is 303(d) Quality Objectives (WQOs)for listed for excess sediment. receiving water bodies established in The project will help meet the Basin Plan within the planning the WQO for turbidity in the horizon. Truckee River HU. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State I� N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Aquatic and riparian habitat 5 acres of wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes will be improved. riparian/wetland to re-establish natural water filtering F N/A habitat improved. processes. Approximately 1,000 feet stream channel improved. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. P N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F_ Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Aquatic and riparian habitat 5 acres of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes will be improved. riparian/wetland associated uplands to support healthy F N/A habitat improved. watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife Approximately and plant habitats. 1,000 feet stream channel improved. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts FV Yes Project addresses impacts 5 acres of caused by existing and new from adjacent freeway and riparian/wetland development. F N/A abandoned hotel. habitat improved. Improves filtration of stormwater. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Numerous stakeholders are Collaboration multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes involved in the project. with 3 Region for information exchange. r N/A stakeholder agencies. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, r Yes protection and restoration needs to r N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that Flooding currently occurs at 5 acres of reduce flood risk. R Yes the project location. riparian/wetland r N/A Decreasing impervious habitat improved. surfaces and expanding floodplain area will reduce this risk. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Climate change will increase 5 acres of water quality,water supply, r Yes risk of flooding due to riparian/wetland groundwater recharge,flood F N/A increasing number of rain on habitat improved. management) in local and regional snow events. Project planning efforts and support efforts mitigates flood risk. to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in Yes order to improve coordination with W N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A More resilient watersheds will be climate change'. better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. Restoring the natural hydrology and improving riparian and upland habitat will reduce erosion. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A The project will increase vegetative emissions (e.g.green technology). cover. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A The project will benefit wildlife not already mentioned elsewhere. habitat and recreational use. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes P-1 No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F- Yes P No System Reoperation F- Yes F7 No Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers f Yes V No r Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F_ Yes FV_ No Desalination F Yes W No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes IV No Surface Storage -- Regional/Local F_ Yes Fv- No prove ater Qualit Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes P-1 No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes W No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F_ No This project matches water quality to instream and ecosystem use by reducing erosion. Pollution Prevention F Yes No The Truckee River is listed as impaired for excess sediment.The project will reduce sediment load to the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management r Yes ► No Urban Runoff Management f4o Yes No The site will treat stormwater generated from adjoining roads, including Interstate 80. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes W No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes R No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration W Yes r No The project will restore ecosystem processes through restoring natural hydrologic patterns, reducing erosion, and improving riparian and upland habitat. Forest Management F Yes W No Land Use Planning and Management ry-' Yes F No The project would eliminate inappropriate development—hotel located in floodplain. Recharge Areas Protection F Yes ry-1 No Water-dependent Recreation F Yes ry-1 No Watershed Management W Yes F No Will improve wildlife habitat and water quality. mprove Flood Management Flood Risk Management FV_ Yes r No The project reduces localized flood risk to infrastructure. Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $750,000 $ $750,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $150,000 Planning, Design and Environmental Compliance Phase 2 $550,000 Construction Phase 3 $50,000 Post Project Monitoring/Adaptive Management Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs All land owners and stakeholders will maintain the will be financed for the 25-year planning project period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Donner Lake Basin Assessment (TRWC, 2016), planning, bid,etc.) includes conceptual design. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Continued erosion and increased sedimentation into the project is not funded. (300 words or less) the Truckee River; loss of native habitat through continued drying conditions. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Project was identified in 01/2016 Evaluation F r Yes the Donner Lake Basin Assessment which was F No completed in January F N/A 2016. b. Final Design F Yes F r No F N/A c. Environmental F Yes Documentation F No (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F Yes F P� N o F N/A e. Construction F Yes Contracting F r No F N/A f. Construction F Yes Implementation F r No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River TMDL, Lahontan Basin project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plan,Truckee River Watershed Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Coordinated Watershed Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Management Strategy. b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Donner Lake Basin Assessment feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Project was identified as a priority research has been conducted) of the proposed project in site in the Donner Lake Basin 300 words or less. Assessment. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID r Yes techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Where feasible,we will use onsite an natural materials including logs, boulders, willow cuttings/poles/stakes, live willow/brush mattresses, etc e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management 17- Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? 17- Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", 17- Yes 17- No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior 17- Yes 17- No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No F N/A subject basin? Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Beth Christman Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568 Truckee, CA 96162 E-mail bchristman@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 Other Cooperating U.S. Forest Service -Tahoe National Forest Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Dry Creek Restoration Project Project Category F_ Water Supply/Wastewater Fv- Restoration F_ Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The goal of the Dry Creek restoration project is to restore (Briefly describe the project, in 300 natural functions to meadows and streams, decrease words or less) erosion, and improve habitat. These goals will be met through the following objectives: -Restore flow to remnant channels -Eliminate eroding gullies -Arrest headcuts in stream channels -Elevate meadow water tables -Improve fish and wildlife habitat -Improve water quality The Dry Creek project will result in the restoration of approximately 200 acres of meadows, improvement of 5 miles of perennial and intermittent stream channel, erosion control on 30 miles of road, and improved habitat across the entire watershed for numerous wildlife species. This current phase includes restoration of two stream and meadow sites. Total number of projects 14 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Tahoe Sierra IRWM Does this project contribute to a larger Yes—Truckee River Sediment TMDL(LRWQCB, 2008), Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River Coordinated Watershed If so provide description. Management Strategy(TRWC, 2014), Dry Creek Watershed Assessment(USFS, 2013). Political Support—List related MOUs, Cooperating agreement with U.S. Forest Service. agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.43361 Longitude: -120.11580 Project Location Description (e.g.,along Dry Creek is located north of the Town of Truckee, and the south bank of stream/river drains to Boca Reservoir.The residential community of between river miles or miles from Russel Valley is located in Dry Creek. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification (e.g.acres of address the linkage to selected Objective streams/wetlands restored or objective? enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Dry Creek project helps Estimated standards in accordance with the FV Yes meet TMDL standards by sediment load attainment date, and participate in r N/A reducing sediment loading reduction up to the development of future TMDLs. to the Truckee River.The 100 tons/year. Truckee River is 303(d) listed for excess sediment and a TMDL has been adopted (LRWQCB, 2008). WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The Dry Creek Project would Two miles of implementing measures such as F Yes decrease erosion through actively eroding perennial stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F N/A restoration. The Truckee stream channel treated control/restoration to meet Water River is 303(d) listed for Three miles of actively excess sediment. The Quality Objectives(WQOs)for projects will help meet the eroding intermittent receiving water bodies established in WQO for turbidity in the stream channel treated. the Basin Plan within the planning Little Truckee River HU. Drainage improved on 30 horizon. miles of roads 200 acres of meadows restored. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification (e.g.acres of address the linkage to selected Objective streams/wetlands restored or Objective? enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State I� N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Restoration actions focus on Two miles of actively wetlands, riparian and upland areas W Yes restoring incised streams to eroding perennial stream to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A stable channels on the channel treated. processes. meadow surface to Three miles of actively improve infiltration eroding intermittent through increased stream channel treated. overbank flow. 200 acres of meadows restored. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. I� N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor F_ Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F7 N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification (e.g.acres of address the linkage to selected Objective streams/wetlands restored or Objective? enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater Meadow restoration will help 200 acres meadow protection activities for high quality F40 Yes to improve shallow restored. groundwater, and advocate for F N/A groundwater recharge. improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Watershed function, wildlife Two miles of actively bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and FV Yes habitat, and instream eroding perennial stream associated uplands to support healthy habitat will be restored channel treated. N/A through implementation of Three miles of active) watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife Y and plant habitats. the Dry Creek Project. eroding intermittent stream channel treated. 200 acres of meadows restored. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of F- Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with The Dry Creek Project 3,500 acres of forest public and private landowners, F40- Yes restoration actions are evaluated for activities to manage forest health and coordinated with forest management. r N/A wildfire risks. management activities to improve forest health and reduce the risk of fire. The forest management plan will be completed by the U.S. Forest Service. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Fy' A rural residential Address erosion on 30 caused by existing and new Yes community is located within miles of road near rural development. r N/A the Dry Creek watershed. residential area. The dirt road network currently contributes significant sediment to meadows and stream courses. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification (e.g.acres of address the linkage to selected Objective streams/wetlands restored or Objective? enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Dry Creek restoration will Collaboration with one multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes take place in collaboration partner organization. Region for information exchange. r- N/A with the U.S. Forest Service. IWM3 - Increase public education and We will engage the public Two site tours, 10 awareness of watershed functions, r Yes through site tours and people per tour protection and restoration needs to r N/A hands-on work days. Two years of Truckee encourage stewardship by the public. Revegetation will take place River Day projects, 20 on Truckee River Day-an people per year. annual volunteer work day. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes r N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The project will restore Two miles of actively water quality,water supply, Fv Yes natural meadow function and eroding perennial stream groundwater recharge,flood hydrology, improving channel treated. r N/A resilience to withstand Three miles of active) management) in local and regional Y planning efforts and support efforts impacts of climate change eroding intermittent to continue improving the science. stream channel treated. 200 acres of meadows restored. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A The project is located in Russel Valley, a disadvantaged community. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A More resilient watersheds will be climate change'. better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. Restoring meadows and stream channels in the Dry Creek watershed would provide enormous benefit through better flood flow attenuation as precipitation shifts from snow to rain. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Improved meadow hydrology will emissions (e.g.green technology). increase vegetation cover and vigor. After restoration, meadow vegetation will sequester more soil carbon and uptake more greenhouse gases than prior to restoration. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Road and trail drainage not already mentioned elsewhere. improvements will facilitate recreational use of the project site. Restoration will improve the quality of forage on the existing sheep grazing allotment in Dry Creek. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes .V No Urban Water Use Efficiency F Yes W No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfer Conveyance- Regional/local r- Yes No System Reoperation F Yes No Water Tra nsfe rs F Yes r No ncrease ater Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes Fy-' No Desalination Yes FV- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water 17- Yes P No Surface Storage -- Regional/Local F- Yes FY-1 No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and 17- Yes W No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F No The project will promote recharge of shallow groundwater. Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F No The project improves water quality through sediment reduction. Pollution Prevention F Yes r No The Truckee River is listed as impaired for excess sediment.The project will reduce the sediment load to the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management F Yes Fy-' No Urban Runoff Management r Yes F- No The project includes improving drainages on the road system in Dry Creek. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes F No Portions of Dry Creek are included in an active grazing allotment. Restoration will improve the quality of forage available. Economic Incentives(Loans, Grants, and 17- Yes P No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes F No The project will improve ecosystem processes through restoring wetlands, stream channels, meadows, and upland areas. Forest Management F Yes r- No Forest management will be completed in conjunction with the Dry Creek restoration project. Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Land Use Planning and Management F Yes V No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes I No Shallow groundwater recharge will increase in the Dry Creek in all restored meadow areas. Restoration will preserve these important sites. Water-dependent Recreation F Yes F No Decreased erosion into Boca Reservoir will help to protect water quality in this important recreation site. Watershed Management F Yes F No The Dry Creek Watershed Assessment resulted in a Restoration Plan for effective watershed management. We are proposing to implement the Restoration Plan. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes W No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $250,000 $450,000 $700,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F Yes I No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $100,000 Planning, Design, Environmental Phase 2 $500,000 Construction Phase 3 $100,000 Monitoring and Adaptive Management Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project USFS In-kind $70,000 cost contribution for project planning and implementation d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding NFWF—very likely $380,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Bella Vista Foundation—very likely e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operations and maintenance costs will be minimal. will be financed for the 25-year planning The meadow restoration projects are designed to period for project implementation (not grant function with little to no intervention after the funded). initial adaptive management period. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Assessment and Concept Design, 2015 costs of planning, bid,etc.) constructing similar projects. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes WO No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Meadow degradation and water quality impacts the project is not funded. (300 words or less) will continue. Implementation costs will rise as degradation becomes more severe. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants: Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation, Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and The Dry Creek -- 03/13 Evaluation F F"-' Yes Watershed Assessment was F No completed in 2013. F N/A Restoration actions were identified. b. Final Design F Yes Final Design will be 06/19 12/19 xF FV_ No the next phase of work once funding is F N/A identified. c. Environmental F Yes NEPA has been 03/13 12/19 Documentation F Fv- NO completed, CEQA will be (CEQA/NEPA) completed when design F N/A is final. d. Permitting F Yes Permits will be prepared 01/19 12/19 No in conjunction with project design. F N/A e. Construction F Yes -- 04/20 05/20 Contracting F W No F N/A f. Construction F Yes -- 08/20 10/20 Implementation F r No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River Sediment TMDL project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General (LRWQCB, 2008), Lahontan Basin Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Plan, Coordinated Watershed Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Management Strategy, updated project list (TRWC, 2014), Sierra Nevada Meadows Business Plan (NFWF, 2010). b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Dry Creek Watershed Assessment feasibility of this project (TRWC, 2013). c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The projects were identified and research has been conducted) of the proposed project in design concepts proposed in the 300 words or less. Restoration Plan contained in the Dry Creek Watershed Assessment (TRWC, 2013). Detailed design and analysis will take place in the next phase. We have successfully implemented two projects identified by the Assessment. Three other projects are funded through implementation. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. '10 Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The projects are designed to use native materials and balance cut/ fills on-site, reducing the need to import or export and dispose of material. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management , Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.if the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No r N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Matt Freitas Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568,Truckee, CA 96162 E-mail mfreitas@truckeeriverwc.org Phone(###)###-#### 530-550-8760 Other Cooperating Placer Nevada Weed Management Area,Town of Truckee, Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders USFS Tahoe National Forest Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Non-native Invasive Plant Species Project Category r Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control Waste Water/Water Supply Project Description The project will treat non-native invasive plant species across (Briefly describe the project, in approximately 500 acres of native habitat, over a three year period. 300words or less) Land will be treated based on criteria such as known weed rating, severity of infestations, amount of land, and complementary construction and maintenance projects. Total number of projects 14 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 12 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Truckee River TMDL, Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River Watershed a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Coordinated Watershed Management Strategy EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related MOU - Placer-Nevada WMA MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.33999 Longitude: 1 -120.12900 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description The majority of targeted non-native invasive plant species (Noxious (e.g., along the south bank of List A, B and some C species) occur along the Truckee River, around stream/river between river Boca and Stampede Reservoirs, or in open space within the Truckee miles or miles from River watershed. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Invasive plants impact water 500 acres treated standards in accordance with the r Yes quality by crowding out for non-native attainment date, and participate in erosion-resistant native plants. plants. the development of future TMDLs. N/A Reducing invasives will reduce sediment reaching the Truckee River, helping to attain the r Truckee River sediment TMDL. WQ2-Reduce pollutant loads by W Reducing invasives and 500 acres treated implementing measures such as Yes promoting native plants will for non-native stormwater LID retrofits, erosion reduce sediment reaching the plants. N/A control/restoration to meet Water Truckee River. Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning r horizon. WQ3- Implement water quality R-o' -- -- monitoring programs through Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems Yes continues to meet Federal and State I� N/A standards. F Project Template Page 2 of 11 2016 Tahoe Sierra IRWM WQ5- Restore degraded streams, Removing non-native plants 500 acres treated wetlands, riparian and upland areas Yes and restoring native vegetation for non-native to re-establish natural water filtering NSA will restore habitat. plants processes. Project Template Page 3 of 11 2016 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F470 N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet -- -- projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r407 N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. r N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water -- -- conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. Wo N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor -- -- groundwater supply to assure future F Yes reliability. WO N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for FV_ N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for -- -- multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural Wo N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 -Enhance and restore water Restore native habitats by 500 acres over bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and W Yes treating competing non- three years associated uplands to support healthy F_ N/A native invasive plant species, watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife promoting re-establishment and plant habitats. of native species. Project Template Page 4 of 11 2016 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 -Develop and implement Through the Weed Warrior 200 acres over programs to prevent the spread of Yes program, continue to work three years existing invasive species and N/A with the community, colonization of potential future property owners and land invasive species. managers to educate, report and treat non-native invasive plant species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Coordinate and collaborate 150 acres over public and private landowners, r Yes with public and private three years activities to manage forest health and F N/A landowners to obtain funding wildfire risks. and treat non-native invasive plant species. ER4-Minimize ecosystem impacts Work with landowners and 150 acres over caused by existing and new Yes land managers to incorporate three year development. f N/A preventative measures into construction documents and maintenance guidelines. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among TRWC will work with public 150 acres over multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes and private landowners and three years Region for information exchange. N/A land managers to educate and treat non-native invasive plant species. IWM3 - Increase public education and Conduct workshops,weed 50 acres over awareness of watershed functions, r Yes walks, and work days for the three years protection and restoration needs to F N/A community. encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. r Yes F%_0 N/A Project Template Page 5 of 11 2016 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Improve habitat quality by 500 acres over water quality,water supply, F11_' Yes removing non-native invasive three years groundwater recharge,flood N/A plant species. management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with F,0_ N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community WO N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. WO N/A -- c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. r N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F N/A The project will improve bank climate change3. stabilization by encouraging establishment of native plant species and increasing habitat resilience to climate change. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas x N/A emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F N/A The project will benefit wildlife habitat not already mentioned elsewhere. and recreational use. Project Template Page 6 of 11 2016 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. Am a p has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r- Yes r No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes F No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance - Regional/local r Yes FO- No -- System Reoperation r Yes FO- No Water Transfers r Yes FO- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes FO- No -- Desalination r Yes FO- No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes Pr No -- Recycled Municipal Water r- Yes r No -- Surface Storage-- Regional/ Local r Yes FO- No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes r No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes FO- No -- Matching Water Quality to Use f Yes r No -- Pollution Prevention r- Yes FO- No -- Salt and Salinity Management F Yes r No -- Urban Runoff Management F- Yes r No -- Project Template Page 7 of 11 2016 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes 1�0 No -- Economic Incentives(Loans, Grants, and F Yes F No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes r No Will restore native plant communities Forest Management r1_0 Yes r No Will reduce presence of flammable non- native plants, reducing the risk of wildfire Land Use Planning and Management W Yes F No Will coordinate across numerous land managers to improve management of natural areas. Recharge Areas Protection r Yes F No -- Water-dependent Recreation F Yes F No -- Watershed Management W Yes F No Will improve wildlife habitat. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 11 2016 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $150,000 $60,000 0 $210,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? W Yes F_ No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $50,000 0 Survey,treat, monitor Phase 2 $50,000 0 Survey,treat, monitor Phase 3 $50,000 0 Survey,treat, monitor Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Martis Fund $60,000 cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Landowners have agreed to changing work practices will be financed for the 25-year planning and policies, as well as maintaining vegetation. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost"(e.g.conceptual, Past successful contracts planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes F"-' No h. Please describe what impact there may be if Continued increase in non-native invasive plant the project is not funded. (300 words or less) species, increase erosion along streams and the Truckee River, decrease in recreational value and wildlife habitat. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 11 2016 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Checkthe Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Phase 1/year 1 r Yes -Prioritize, survey,treat, 01/2019 12/2019 F7 F1'_ No monitor invasive weeds. F N/A -Conduct professional development training workshops and hold community workdays b. Phase 2/year 2 r Yes Prioritize, survey,treat, 01/2020 12/2020 F7 W_ No monitor invasive weeds. F N/A -Conduct professional c. Phase 3/year 3 f Yes Prioritize, survey,treat, 01/2021 12/2021 7 r No monitor invasive weeds. r- N/A -Conduct professional development training r Yes -- -- -- F P_ No r N/A r Yes W' No F N/A F Yes F,/_ No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 11 2016 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River TMDL, Lahontan Basin project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plan, Truckee River Watershed Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Coordinated Watershed Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) Management Strategy b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The effects of non-native invasive research has been conducted) of the proposed project in plant species on our native habitats, 300 words or less. wildlife, and water quality has been well documented for decades. The California Department of Food and Agriculture developed a Noxious Weed List and rating system and mandates the treatment of these species in the State of California. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. IJ Yes r No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management Yes No r10' N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? Yes No .� N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes No ` N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", Yes No ` N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP (due Yes No V N/A 12/31/12)? Project Template Page 11 of 11 2016 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F" N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F_ Yes F No W N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the r- Yes F No Fv N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 11 2016 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Eben Swain Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568, Truckee CA 96162 E-mail eswain@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### (530)550-8760 Other Cooperating Truckee Donner Land Trust, U.S. Forest Service Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Johnson Canyon Westside Restoration Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater V Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The naturally erosive watershed has a long history of human (Briefly describe the project, in 300 use which has resulted in altered hydrology. Restoration words or less) actions include re-connecting disrupted drainages to restore natural hydrology, improving drainage on existing roads and trails, and revegetation as appropriate.TRWC and partners will implement restoration to reduce erosion, and improve water quality and habitat. Total number of projects 14 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 4 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes—Truckee River Sediment TMDL(LRWQCB, 2008), Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River Coordinated Watershed If so provide description. Management Strategy (TRWC, 2014), Negro Canyon watershed Assessment (TRWC, 2010),Johnson Canyon West —watershed assessment (TRWC, 2016), Donner Basin Assessment(TRWC, 2016) Political Support—List related MOUs, An agreement is in place with both project partners. agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.33694 Longitude: -120.29420 Project Location Description (e.g., along the south bank of stream/river Tahoe Sierra IRWM between river miles or miles from Johnson Canyon (formerly known as Negro Canyon) is Towns/intersection and/or address): located in the Donner Lake watershed. It is a tributary to Donner Lake and drains to the northwest side of the lake. Restoration work is focused on the area of the watershed north of Interstate 80.This phase addresses the west side of the canyon. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The project helps meet TMDL Estimated annual standards in accordance with the r Yes standards by reducing sediment load attainment date, and participate in N/A sediment loading to the reduction for the development of future TMDLs. Truckee River. The Truckee project—75 River is 303(d) listed for tons/year. excess sediment and a TMDL has been adopted (LRWQCB, 2008). WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The project involves restoring Drainage implementing measures such as F40 Yes three major erosion sites and improved on one stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F N/A treating erosive dirt roads in mile of road. control/restoration to meet Water the Truckee River watershed. Estimated annual Quality Objectives(WQOs)for The Truckee River is 303(d) sediment load receiving water bodies established in listed for excess sediment. reduction for the Basin Plan within the planning The project will help meet project—75 horizon. the WQO for turbidity in the tons/year Truckee River HU. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Restoration actions focus 1,250 feet of wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes restoring natural hydrologic stream corridor to re-establish natural water filtering F N/A patterns to reduce sediment improved. One processes. delivery to streams. acre of upland Restoration will improve restored. aquatic and riparian habitat as well as upland areas. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or Johnson Canyon is a major Estimated annual replace infrastructure to reliably Fv Yes contributor of sediment to sediment load supply water. F N/A Donner Lake,which provides reduction for water to the Reno/Sparks project—75 metropolitan area. Reducing tons/year sediment reaching Donner Lake improves the reliability of the water supply through reduced maintenance dredging. WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The project goal is to restore 1,250 feet of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and Fv Yes natural hydrologic function stream corridor associated uplands to support healthy r N/A to improve watershed health. improved. One watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife The project will improve acre of upland and plant habitats. aquatic, riparian, and upland restored habitat. Johnson Canyon is critical habitat for the Truckee-Loya Ito n deer herd. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The project will be completed Collaboration multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes as a collaboration between between three Region for information exchange. r- N/A the U.S. Forest Service, organizations. Truckee Donner Land Trust, and TRWC. IWM3 - Increase public education and We will engage the public Four Site Tours, awareness of watershed functions, F Yes through site tours and hands- 10 people per protection and restoration needs to r N/A on work days. Revegetation tour.Two years encourage stewardship by the public. will take place on Truckee of Truckee River River Day-an annual Day projects, 50 volunteer work day. people per year. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes F7 N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The project will improve 1,250 feet of water quality,water supply, r Yes ecosystem function, stream corridor groundwater recharge,flood F N/A increasing the resilience of improved. One management) in local and regional the watershed to withstand acre of upland planning efforts and support efforts impacts of climate change. restored to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A More resilient watersheds will be climate change'. better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. In rain on snow events, sediment production from Johnson Canyon is severe due to altered hydrologic patterns. Restoring the natural hydrology and improving riparian and upland habitat will reduce erosion. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A The project will increase vegetative emissions (e.g.green technology). cover, improving greenhouse gas uptake. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A The project will improve roads and not already mentioned elsewhere. trails used for recreation. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Conveyance- Regional/local F Yes V No System Reoperation F Yes IV No Water Transfers Yes Fv- No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater r Yes Fv- No Desalination r Yes Fv- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water r Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes F No The project will reduce sediment load to Donner Lake. Periodic dredging of Donner Lake is needed to maintain the surface storage needed for urban water supply downstream. Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F- No The project will reduce sediment load Distribution to Donner Lake. Periodic dredging of Donner Lake is needed to maintain the surface storage needed for urban water supply downstream. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes Fv- No Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes I— No The project will directly improve water quality in Donner Lake. Pollution Prevention IV Yes F- No The Truckee River is listed as impaired for excess sediment.The project will reduce sediment load to the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management Yes F No Urban Runoff Management Yes Iv No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes IV No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r Yes No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration Yes No The project will restore ecosystem processes through restoring natural hydrologic patterns, reducing erosion, and improving riparian and upland habitat. Forest Management r Yes F No The project improves an existing road that is used for forest and fuels management and access in case of wildfire. Land Use Planning and Management Yes V No Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Recharge Areas Protection F_ Yes Fv- No Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes Fv- No Watershed Management FV_ Yes F_ No A watershed assessment and restoration plan was completed for the entire Johnson Canyon watershed. We are implementing the management measures identified in the assessment as funding allows. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes F_ No The project will help alleviate localized flooding due to improved drainage and floodplain access. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $250,000 $190,000 $440,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes F_ No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $65,000 Assessment, Design, Environmental Compliance Phase 2 $355,000 Construction Phase 3 $20,000 Monitoring and Adaptive Management Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project NFF-$75,000 $190,000 cost Placer Nevada RAC- $40,000 USFS in-kind - $25,000 Truckee River Fund - $50,000 d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operations and maintenance costs will be minimal. will be financed for the 25-year planning Every S years, some maintenance on the existing period for project implementation (not grant road will take place,which is covered by Forest funded). Service operations budgets. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Project cost is based upon Phase 1 construction and planning, bid,etc.) design costs and design plans for Phase 2.A cost benefit analysis was completed for Phase 1,which is largely transferable to Phase 2 work. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes r- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Severe erosion will continue. Every year restoration the project is not funded. (300 words or less) is delayed implementation costs increase due to the increase in damage. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes Watershed Assessments 1/2017 Evaluation F F No were completed in 2010 and 2017. F N/A b. Final Design r Yes Final design plans are 1/2017 3/2018 F F No completed for the West side restoration. F N/A c. Environmental r Yes A NOE was issued in 6/2017 Documentation F F No June, 2017. (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F Yes Permit applications are 12/2017 4/2018 x r No currently being F N/A completed and will be filed. e. Construction F Yes Construction may be 5/2018 6/2019 Contracting F F No phased. F N/A f. Construction F Yes NO Construction may be 8/2018 10/2019 Implementation F phased. F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Johnson Canyon (aka Negro Canyon) project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General is identified in the Truckee River Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Sediment TMDL Staff Report Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) (LRWQCB, 2008, Section 10-3), as well as the Coordinated Watershed Management Strategy, (TRWC 2004, Ch. 5). b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Negro Canyon Watershed feasibility of this project Assessment(TRWC, 2008, Ch. 5). Johnson Canyon West Assessment (TRWC, 2017).Johnson Canyon Phase 1 Design Plan (TRWC, 2014). Johnson Canyon West Design plan (TRWC, 2018) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Road treatments are based on FS research has been conducted) of the proposed project in standards proven to reduce 300 words or less. sediment productions from roads (e.g.Gucinski et al., 2001). Restoration practices will be based upon project success of Phase 1 work in the eastern portion of the Johnson Canyon watershed. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. FO_ Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe Native vegetation and on-site materials will be used for construction. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No xF N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No XF N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No xF N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No X F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due ❑Yes F No X❑ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior ❑Yes F No X ❑ N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No X❑ N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A grant submittal date? X 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Beth Christman Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568,Truckee CA 96162 E-mail bchristman@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 Other Cooperating Truckee Donner Land Trust, U.S. Forest Service Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Lacey Meadows Restoration Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater V Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The goal of the Lacey Meadows Restoration project is to (Briefly describe the project, in 300 improve ecosystem resilience in a headwater meadow words or less) system. This goal will be achieved by the following objectives: -restore two meadow systems (Upper and Lower Lacey Meadows) -implement grazing management plan to protect restored meadows -develop lake level management plan to reduce stream erosion -dirt road management and decommissioning to reduce sediment delivery In 2013,TRWC completed a watershed assessment that demonstrated disturbance throughout the Lacey watershed has resulted in altered hydrology, habitat degradation, and water quality impacts (TRWC, 2013). In 2018, we will begin pre-project monitoring and final design on two meadow restoration projects. The Lacey Meadows Restoration project would restore 150 acres of meadow habitat, improve 4,500 feet of stream channel, reduce erosion along 4.5 miles of road, and implement management plans (grazing, lake level) to protect watershed restoration actions. Total number of projects 14 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes—Truckee River Sediment TMDL(LRWQCB, 2008), Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River Coordinated Watershed If so provide description. Management Strategy (TRWC, 2014), Lacey Meadows Assessment (TRWC, 2013). Political Support—List related MOUs, The Lacey Meadows Assessment was completed under an agreements or TACs currently in place. agreement with the Truckee Donner Land Trust.This agreement will continue through implementation. Project Location: Latitude: 39.47472 Longitude: -120.41810 Project Location Description (e.g.,along Lacey Meadows includes the area to the south of the south bank of stream/river Webber Lake, in the Upper Little Truckee River between river miles or miles from watershed. Specific project locations include the Lower Towns/intersection and/or address): Meadow (adjacent to Webber Lake),the Upper Meadow (south of the lower meadow, along Lacey Creek), Webber Lake, and along Meadow Lake and Lacey Meadows roads. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) Project Template Page 2 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lacey Meadows project Address standards in accordance with the r Yes helps meet TMDL standards sediment attainment date, and participate in � N/A loading to the Truckee River.by reducing sediment sources along the development of future TMDLs. 4.5 miles of The Truckee River is 303(d) road with listed for excess sediment and a TMDL has been connectivity to adopted (LRWQCB, stream courses 2008). Move 2,500 feet of stream from eroding channel to stable alignment Reduce erosion along 2,000 feet of lower Lacey Creek WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The project will reduce Address implementing measures such as Yes erosion in the Truckee River sediment stormwater LID retrofits, erosion watershed, which is 303(d) sources along r control/restoration to meet Water N/A listed for excess sediment. 4.5 miles of Sediment reductions Quality Objectives(WQOs)for attained the project will road with receiving water bodies established in help meet the turbidity connectivity to the Basin Plan within the planning WQO for the Little Truckee stream courses horizon. River Hydrologic unit. Move 2,500 feet of stream from eroding channel to stable alignment Reduce erosion along 2,000 feet of lower Lacey Creek WQ3 - Implement water quality Water quality monitoring is Implement monitoring programs through Yes included in project monitoring planning horizon, and coordinate N/A monitoring plan. program for annually throughout the Region. temperature and conductivity. Project Template Page 3 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of Objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, The Lacey Meadows project 4,500 feet of wetlands, riparian and upland areas W Yes includes restoration of stream to re-establish natural water filtering - N/A incised and eroding restored processes. streams. In Upper Lacey 150 acres Meadows, flow will be riparian/ returned to stable remnant wetland channels. This will reduce habitat erosion, promote riparian restored habitat development and Two allow water to spread over management the floodplain. plans developed In Lower Lacey Meadows, connectivity with the floodplain will be re- established to promote wetland and riparian habitat development, reduce in-channel erosion and improve infiltration. The lake level management plan will help to reduce instream erosion within Lower Lacey Meadows. The grazing management plan will protect streams and meadows from further degradation. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection, treatment and disposal of N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 4 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. F7 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Meadow restoration will Improve shallow protection activities for high quality r Yes promote shallow groundwater groundwater, and advocate for 17- N/A groundwater infiltration. storage across improvements to impacted 150 acres. groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 5 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water Lacey Meadows is a 4,500 feet of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes biologically rich area (TRWC, stream associated uplands to support healthy r N/A 2013). Restoration and restored watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife grazing management will 150 acres and plant habitats. improve fish habitat through riparian/ reducing erosion, and wetland promote riparian habitat habitat development. restored Grazing management plan developed to protect 450 acres of meadow (restored and existing meadows) ER2 - Develop and implement Grazing management plan Protect 450 acres programs to prevent the spread of r Yes will include provisions to from introduction existing invasive species and r N/A prevent the spread of of invasive plants. colonization of potential future invasive plants. invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with The overall management 1,000 acres of public and private landowners, Fv Yes plan for the Lacey watershed forest managed activities to manage forest health and r N/A includes forest management. to prevent wildfire risks. We will work cooperatively wildfire. with TDLT to coordinate forestry and meadow restoration work ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. Project Template Page 6 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Lacey Meadows restoration Collaboration multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes will take place in partnership between four Region for information exchange. r N/A with the Truckee Donner organizations. Land Trust,the U.S. Forest Service,The Nature Conservancy, and TRWC. IWM3 - Increase public education and We will engage the public Four Site Tours, awareness of watershed functions, F-0 Yes through site tours and hands- 10 people per protection and restoration needs to 17- N/A on work days. Revegetation tour encourage stewardship by the public. will take place on Truckee Three years of River Day-an annual Truckee River Day volunteer work day. projects, 20 people per year IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes P N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The project will restore 4,500 feet of water quality,water supply, r Yes natural meadow function and stream groundwater recharge,flood r N/A hydrology, improving restored management) in local and regional resilience to withstand 150 acres planning efforts and support efforts impacts of climate change riparian/ to continue improving the science. wetland habitat restored IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 7 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A The project is located in Sierra County, a disadvantaged community. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A More resilient watersheds will be climate change'. better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. Restoring a large headwater meadow like Lacey Meadows would provide enormous benefit through better flood flow attenuation as precipitation shifts from snow to rain. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Improved meadow hydrology will emissions (e.g.green technology). increase vegetation cover and vigor. After restoration, meadow vegetation will sequester more soil carbon and uptake more greenhouse gases than prior to restoration. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F7 Yes F- No The grazing plan will address water use by livestock to promote efficiency. Project Template Page 8 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Urban Water Use Efficiency Yes V No perational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local Yes F No System Reoperation Yes F No Water Transfers Yes F No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater FV- Yes F No The project will improve shallow groundwater infiltration. Desalination Yes F No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water Yes F No Surface Storage-- Regional/Local Yes F No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation Yes No The project will improve shallow groundwater infiltration. Matching Water Quality to Use Yes No The project will improve water quality through reducing erosion. Pollution Prevention F Yes No The project will improve water quality through reducing erosion. Salt and Salinity Management Yes F No Urban Runoff Management F- Yes F7 No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes F No Restoration will improve the quality of forage available. The Grazing Management Plan will improve sustainability of the existing allotment. Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes F No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes F No The project will restore ecosystem processes by reducing erosion, promoting meadow function, and improving habitat. Forest Management ry-' Yes r No The larger Lacey Meadows project as outlined in the Assessment (TRWC, 2013) includes development of a forest management strategy to reduce the risk of catastrophic fire. Land Use Planning and Management F Yes F No The Lacey Meadows project includes development of a recreation management plan. Recharge Areas Protection Yes r No The Lacey Meadows project protects Project Template Page 9 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? and restores up to 450 acres of meadow, a shallow groundwater recharge area. Water-dependent Recreation r Yes F No Webber Lake supports a recreational fishery and is popular for paddle sports. Improvements to water quality in the inflow stream, Lacey Creek,will help to protect the recreational resource. Watershed Management r Yes F_ No Lacey Meadows Restoration projects were identified by the Lacey Meadows Assessment(TRWC, 2013), a watershed assessment and management plan. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes FV_ No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 10 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $275,000 $450,000 $400,000 $1,125,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes F_ No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $400,000 0 Planning,design, and environmental compliance Phase 2 $600,000 0 Construction. Construction can be broken into phases. Phase 3 $125,000 0 Post-project monitoring and adaptive management Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project CDFW $400,000 cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding NFWF—likely $450,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Bella Vista Foundation - likely e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The restoration projects are designed to be self- will be financed for the 25-year planning sustaining. Road management required periodic period for project implementation (not grant maintenance—approximately every 5 years. The funded). bulk of the roads are U.S. Forest Service roads and maintenance will be covered from their operations budgets. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Assessment and conceptual design. planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes WO No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Meadow degradation and water quality impacts the project is not funded. (300 words or less) will continue. Implementation costs will rise as degradation becomes more severe. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 11 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and 9 Yes The Lacey Meadows 8/2013 Evaluation F F No Assessment was F_ N/A completed in 2013. It identified restoration and management opportunities, project actions,and relative cost. b. Final Design F Yes Final design is needed 6/2018 6/2019 r NO for two projects (Upper F N/A Meadow, and Lower Meadow). Funding has been obtained to complete this phase. c. Environmental F Yes W Environmental 6/2018 6/2019 Documentation F NO Documentation will take (CEQA/NEPA) N/A place concurrently with final design d. Permitting F Yes Permitting will begin 1/2019 7/2019 No F F N/A during the final design phase e. Construction Yes Construction may take 7/2019 5/2021 Contracting F NO place over several years N/A if the project is phased. f. Construction F Yes Construction may take 8/2019 10/2021 Implementation rNo place over several years. F N/A Project Template Page 12 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 13 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River Sediment TMDL project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General (LRWQCB, 2008), Lahontan Basin Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Plan, Coordinated Watershed Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Management Strategy, updated project list (TRWC, 2014), Sierra Nevada Meadows Business Plan (NFWF, 2010). b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Lacey Meadows Assessment feasibility of this project (TRWC, 2013) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The restoration and management research has been conducted) of the proposed project in projects were identified through 300 words or less. a scientifically-based watershed assessment (TRWC, 2013),which included stream surveys,vegetation surveys, and historic aerial analysis. Additional studies will be needed to determine final project design - detailed site surveys, hydraulic modeling, and aquatic surveys. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID X Yes techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The restoration projects are conceptually designed to use native materials and balance cut/fill on- site, reducing the need to import or export and dispose of material e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No xF N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No xF N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No xF N/A (CWC§525) 4.if the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No x F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: Project Template Page 14 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No x F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No xF N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No xF N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No F N/A grant submittal date? x 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 15 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Michele Prestowitz Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568,Truckee CA 96162 E-mail mprestowitz@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### (530)550-8760 Other Cooperating U.S. Forest Service, Placer County Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Lower Bear Meadow Restoration Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater V Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The overall goals of the Bear Creek Lower Meadow (Briefly describe the project, in 300 restoration project include: words or less) -Restore meadow hydrology and habitat -Reduce sources of instream sediment from bank erosion -Protect existing spring-fed tributaries that provide hydrologic support to the meadow Total number of projects 14 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 5 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes—Truckee River Sediment TMDL(LRWQCB, 2008), Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River Coordinated Watershed If so provide description. Management Strategy (TRWC, 2014), Bear Creek Assessment (TRWC, 2017) Political Support—List related MOUs, An agreement is in place between TRWC and USFS (the agreements or TACs currently in place. landowner). Project Location: Latitude: 39.18511 Longitude: -120.20922 Project Location Description (e.g., along Bear Creek, upstream of confluence with Truckee River, the south bank of stream/river downstream of first crossing on Alpine Meadows road. between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lower Bear Meadow Reduce erosion standards in accordance with the P Yes project helps meet TMDL along attainment date, and participate in standards by reducing approximately F N/A sediment loading to the the development of future TMDLs. 2 000 feet of Bear Truckee River.The Truckee , River is 303(d) listed for Creek, excess sediment and a TMDL immediately has been adopted (LRWQCB, upstream of 2008). confluence with Truckee River. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The project will reduce Reduce erosion implementing measures such as F Yes erosion in the Truckee River along stormwater LID retrofits, erosion N/A watershed, which is 303(d) approximately control/restoration to meet Water listed for excess sediment. 2,000 feet of Bear Quality Objectives(WQOs)for Sediment reductions attained Creek, receiving water bodies established in by the project directly reduce immediately the Basin Plan within the planning loading to the Truckee River. upstream of horizon. confluence with Truckee River. WQ3 - Implement water quality Regular monitoring for Continued monitoring programs through r Yes turbidity takes place operation of planning horizon, and coordinate N/A immediately downstream of quarterly annually throughout the Region. the project site. monitoring. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, The Lower Bear Meadow 5 acres of wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes project will restore valuable meadow restored to re-establish natural water filtering F N/A meadow habitat, restore processes. remnant stream channels, Erosion treated and reduce erosion from the on 2,000 feet of existing stream channel. existing stream channel 3 remnant channels restored. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. Fv N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater Meadow restoration will 5 acres of protection activities for high quality r Yes promote shallow meadow groundwater, and advocate for r N/A groundwater infiltration restored. improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The Lower Bear Meadow 5 acres of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes project will restore valuable meadow restored associated uplands to support healthy r N/A meadow habitat, restore watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife remnant stream channels, Erosion treated and plant habitats. and reduce erosion from the on 2,000 feet of existing stream channel. existing stream channel 3 remnant channels restored. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F7 Yes The Lower Bear Meadow 5 acres of caused by existing and new project will improve meadow restored development. r N/A stormwater treatment from to improve the Alpine Meadows road infiltration. and associated development. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The project will be completed Coordination with multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes in partnership with the U.S. 2 stakeholder Region for information exchange. r N/A Forest Service and Placer groups. County IWM3 - Increase public education and We will feature the project at One site tour awareness of watershed functions, r Yes a minimum of one site tour attended by 10 protection and restoration needs to r- N/A and one community work day people encourage stewardship by the public. One work day attended by 20 people IWM4- Promote activities that Increasing floodplain area Floodplain access reduce flood risk. FV Yes through the project site will increased along r N/A reduce risk of localized 2,000 feet of flooding stream 5 acres of meadow floodplain restored IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The project will increase Floodplain access water quality,water supply, Fv- Yes localized resilience to climate increased along groundwater recharge,flood F N/A change through reducing 2,000 feet of management) in local and regional flood risk. The restored stream planning efforts and support efforts meadow will provide some to continue improving the science. improvement in greenhouse 5 acres of gas uptake over current meadow conditions. floodplain restored Meadow vegetation improved on 5 acres IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A More resilient watersheds will be climate change'. better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. Restoring any meadow habitat will improve flood flow attenuation as precipitation shifts from snow to rain. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Improved meadow hydrology will emissions (e.g.green technology). increase vegetation cover and vigor. After restoration, meadow vegetation will sequester more soil carbon and uptake more greenhouse gases than prior to restoration. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Conveyance- Regional/local F Yes V No System Reoperation F Yes IV No Water Transfers F Yes � No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F Yes No The project will improve shallow groundwater infiltration Desalination r Yes W No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes r No Surface Storage -- Regional/Local Yes IV No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes R No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation 1740 Yes F No The project will improve shallow groundwater infiltration. Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F No The project will provide water quality improvement through sediment reduction. Pollution Prevention W Yes F No The project will provide water quality improvement through sediment reduction. Salt and Salinity Management Yes No Urban Runoff Management F Yes No The project will improve stormwater treatment for the Alpine Meadows road. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes 40 No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes V No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes No The project will restore ecosystem processes by reducing erosion, promoting meadow function, and improving habitat. Forest Management F Yes R No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes lV` No Recharge Areas Protection F7 Yes F No The project will protect and restore a meadow recharge area. Water-dependent Recreation F Yes W No Watershed Management W Yes r No The project implements watershed management actions identified in the Bear Creek Assessment (TRWC, 2017). Improve Flood Management Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Flood Risk Management V Yes No The project will reduce localized flood risk. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage-CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $650,000 $225,000 $875,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $225,000 Assessment and Design Phase 2 $600,000 Construction Phase 3 $50,000 Monitoring and Adaptive Management Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Martis Fund $175,000 cost U.S. Forest Service— $50,000 in kind d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The restoration projects are designed to be self- will be financed for the 25-year planning sustaining. Road management required periodic period for project implementation (not grant maintenance—approximately every 5 years. The funded). bulk of the roads are U.S. Forest Service roads and maintenance will be covered from their operations budgets. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Restoration Design Plan (90%),Assessment planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Meadow degradation and water quality impacts will the project is not funded. (300 words or less) continue. Implementation costs will rise as degradation becomes more severe. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and 9 Yes Watershed assessment 1/2017 12/2017 Evaluation F F No completed in 2017. F_ N/A Conceptual design completed in 2017. b. Final Design F_ Yes Design is at 90%. 9/2017 3/2018 F No x F N/A c. Environmental F Yes - No NEPA and CEQA have 9/2017 6/2018 Documentation x been started and are (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A being completed concurrently with final design. d. Permitting F Yes Permits will be 3/2018 9/2018 r No completed when design N/A is final. e. Construction F Yes 5/2019 6/2019 Contracting FV No � � N/A f. Construction F Yes 8/2019 10/2019 Implementation � No F F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is CEQA/NEPA and final design are being completed in parallel. checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River Sediment TMDL project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General (LRWQCB, 2008), Lahontan Basin Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Plan, Coordinated Watershed Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Management Strategy, updated project list (TRWC, 2014), Sierra Nevada Meadows Business Plan (NFWF, 2010), Bear Creek Watershed Assessment (TRWC, 2017). b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Bear Creek Lower Meadow Reach feasibility of this project Restoration (TRWC, 2018) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Scientifically based watershed research has been conducted) of the proposed project in assessment identified the impacts at 300 words or less. the project area and conceptual designs for restoration. A Design Basis Memo and Restoration Design plans are at the 90%stage. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID X Yes techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The restoration is designed to take advantage of on-site material and to balance cut and fill on site. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? x 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A x 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) x 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project x funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due ❑Yes F No X ❑ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior ❑Yes ❑ No X ❑ N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the ❑Yes ❑ No X❑ N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A grant submittal date? X 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Michele Prestowitz Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568,Truckee, CA 96162 E-mail mprestowitz@truckeeriverwc.or Phone (###)###-#### (530)550-8760 Other Cooperating Northstar Community Services District, U.S.Army Corps of Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Engineers Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Martis Wildlife Area Restoration Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater V Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The goal of the Martis Watershed Restoration Plan (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Implementation project (Martis project) is to restore words or less) Mainstem Martis Creek and three tributaries. These projects were identified through the Martis Watershed Assessment (TRWC, 2012). The objectives of the Martis project include: -Implement meadow and stream restoration along the Mainstem of Middle Martis -Replace failed culverts with a full span bridge to restore stream conveyance and continuity on unnamed tributary -Restore large headcut on Middle Martis Creek -Restore headcut on Lookout Mountain tributary Total number of projects 14 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 6 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes—Truckee River Sediment TMDL(LRWQCB, 2008), Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River Coordinated Watershed If so provide description. Management Strategy (TRWC, 2014), Martis Watershed Assessment(TRWC, 2012) Political Support—List related MOUs, Stakeholder Steering Committee; project partner agreements or TACs currently in place. agreements. We have an existing agreement with the Tahoe Sierra IRWM USCOE, the landowner. Project Location: Latitude: 39.31889 Longitude: -120.10080 Project Location Description (e.g.,along The project sites are all located in the Martis Wildlife Area, in the south bank of stream/river Martis Valley. The projects are located along the Mainstem between river miles or miles from of Martis Creek, Middle Martis Creek, and two other Towns/intersection and/or address): tributary streams, primarily south of Highway 267. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of Objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The project helps meet Annual sediment standards in accordance with the Y Yes TMDL standards by reducing load reduction attainment date, and participate in sediment loading to the of up to 200 N/A the development of future TMDLs. Truckee River.The Truckee tons/year River is 303(d) listed for excess sediment and a TMDL has been adopted (LRWQCB, 2008). WQ2— Reduce pollutant loads by The Martis Project will Annual sediment implementing measures such as r Yes decrease erosion through load reduction stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A restoration. The Truckee of up to 200 control/restoration to meet Water River is 303(d) listed for tons/year Quality Objectives (WQOs)for excess sediment. The receiving water bodies established in projects will help meet the the Basin Plan within the planning WQO for turbidity in the horizon. Truckee River HU. WQ3 - Implement water quality There is active water quality Continuation of monitoring programs through r Yes monitoring in Martis Valley, two water quality planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A including TRWC's volunteer monitoring annually throughout the Region. monitoring plan and Placer programs. County's sediment monitoring plan. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State I� N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Restoration actions will take The project will wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes place along several major restore and to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A branches of Martis Creek and enhance 39 acres processes. associated tributaries. of wetland Riparian, wetland, and habitat. upland habitat would all benefit. Incised reaches will The project will be restored to improve address erosion overbank flow and along^2 miles of infiltration. stream. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. P N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F_ Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater A large aquifer that provides Protect and protection activities for high quality r Yes municipal water supply restore up to 39 groundwater, and advocate for r N/A lies below Martis Valley. Acres of improvements to impacted During the watershed groundwater groundwater quality through public assessment, critical recharge education. recharge zones were zones identified. The Martis Project includes protection of these important areas. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Watershed function, wildlife Re-connect bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes habitat, and instream habitat floodplain associated uplands to support healthy r N/A will be restored through along 1.75 watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife implementation of the Martis miles of and plant habitats. Project. stream, restoring wetlands and reducing instream erosion Restore and enhance up to 39 acres of meadow/wetland habitat. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes There is substantial 1.75 miles of caused by existing and new residential and commercial stream and development. r N/A development in the Martis Creek Watershed. This adjacent project will help to offset wetlands some of these impacts restored through improving the resiliency of the stream and meadow systems below development. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The Martis Project was Continue multiple jurisdictions within the Fv Yes developed in collaboration coordination Region for information exchange. r N/A between the major among a landowners and minimum of stakeholders in the Martis two major watershed. This landowners collaboration will continue through implementation. IWM3 - Increase public education and We will increase education Two community awareness of watershed functions, FV Yes and awareness through Presentations protection and restoration needs to r N/A community presentations, Six site tours encourage stewardship by the public. site tours, and community with 10 work days completed on participants our annual Truckee River Three years of Day event- a community Truckee River work day Day projects featuring 30 participants annually IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes W N/A Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of Objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The project will restore 1.75 miles of water quality, water supply, .% Yes natural meadow function stream and groundwater recharge,flood and hydrology, improving adjacent management) in local and regional r N/A resilience to withstand meadows and planning efforts and support efforts impacts of climate change wetlands to continue improving the science. restored IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in 17- Yes order to improve coordination with N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A More resilient watersheds will be climate change'. better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. Restoring meadows and compacted upland areas in the Martis watershed would provide enormous benefit through better flood flow attenuation as precipitation shifts from snow to rain. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Improved meadow hydrology will emissions (e.g.green technology). increase vegetation cover and vigor. After restoration, meadow vegetation will sequester more soil carbon and uptake more greenhouse gases than prior to restoration. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Restoration planning and not already mentioned elsewhere. implementation will enhance recreation in Martis Valley. Our project includes cooperative planning with landowners to improve trails on their land in conjunction with restoration. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes Fv- No Urban Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F_ Yes Fv- No System Reoperation F_ Yes Fv- No Water Transfers F_ Yes Fv- No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F_ Yes Fv- No Desalination F_ Yes Fv- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes FV_ No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes FY-1 No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes FV_ No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes FV_ No Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F_ No Pollution Prevention Fy' Yes F No The Truckee River is listed as impaired for excess sediment. The project will reduce the sediment load to the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management Yes Fy-' No Urban Runoff Management F Yes FV_ No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes FV_ No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes Fv No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F No The project will result in improved ecosystem processes through restoring wetlands, stream channels, and meadows. Forest Management F Yes r No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes P No Recharge Areas Protection R Yes F_ No The project will help to protect important groundwater recharge areas in the Martis watershed. Water-dependent Recreation lV Yes F_ No Water quality in Martis Lake will benefit from restoration of upstream areas. Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Watershed Management V Yes No The Martis Watershed Assessment resulted in a Restoration Plan for effective watershed management. We are proposing to implement elements of the Restoration Plan. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management FV_ Yes F No Improving resilience of the meadow above Martis Lake will help with flood flow attenuation. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $3,200,000 $350,000 $3,750,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $350,000 Planning,design, and environmental compliance Phase 2 $3,000,000 Construction Phase 3 $200,000 Monitoring and Adaptive management Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Martis Fund $350,000 cost Bella Vista Foundation d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs The restoration work is designed to be self- will be financed for the 25-year planning sustaining,therefore there should not be any period for project implementation (not grant additional maintenance costs. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Final Design plans. planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Degradation will continue in the Martis watershed the project is not funded. (300 words or less) resulting in water quality impacts, wetland and meadow loss, and increased upland runoff. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes The watershed 4/2012 Evaluation F F No assessment was F N/A completed in 2012 b. Final Design W_ Yes Designs are complete for 6/2016 2/2018 F F No all four sites. F N/A c. Environmental F Yes N CEQA and NEPA are in 6/2017 6/2018 Documentation x o process (CEQA/NEPA) N/A d. Permitting F Yes WNO Permits are being 12/2017 6/2018 x prepared and will be filed N/A shortly. e. Construction F Yes WNO Construction may be 5/2019 6/2020 Contracting F phased F N/A f. Construction F Yes NO Construction may be 8/2019 10/2020 Implementation F phased F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River Sediment TMDL project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General (LRWQCB, 2008), Lahontan Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Basin Plan, Coordinated Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Watershed Management Strategy, updated project list (TRWC, 2014), Sierra Nevada Meadows Business Plan (NFWF, 2010). b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Martis Watershed Assessment feasibility of this project (TRWC, 2012), Mainstem Martis Conceptual Restoration Plan (TRWC, 2015), Mainstem Martis Final Restoration Plan (TRWC, 2017), Martis Wildlife Area Restoration plan (TRWC, 2018) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much All projects were identified through research has been conducted) of the proposed project in a scientifically based watershed 300 words or less. assessment. Further detailed site- specific assessment and studies were completed in support of the restoration site plans. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes F_ No F_ N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The projects are designed to use native materials and balance cut/fill on-site, reducing the need to import or export and dispose of material. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? x 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A x 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) x Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No x F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No x F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No xr N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No x F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No r N/A grant submittal date? x 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Matt Freitas Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568 Truckee, CA 96162 E-mail mfreitas@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 Other Cooperating Town of Truckee,Truckee Donner Land Trust,Trout Unlimited, Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Truckee Sanitation District, USFS Truckee Ranger District, Truckee River Legacy Foundation. Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title River Revitalization Project Project Category F_ Water Supply/Wastewater F-0 Restoration F Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The goal of the River Revitalization Project is to reduce (Briefly describe the project, in 300 excess sediment generated along the main stem of the words or less) Truckee River in support of attainment of the Truckee River TMDL. We will achieve this by coordinating stakeholder meetings, identifying and prioritizing projects, identifying funding sources and coordinating implementation. This project will reduce nonpoint source pollution and sediment loading, improve existing wetland and riparian habitats, increase total amount of wetland and riparian area, and improve surface infiltration. Total number of projects 14 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes,Truckee River TMDL(LRWQCB, 2008). Coordinated Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Watershed Management Strategy(TRWC, 2014). Downtown If so provide description. River Revitalization Strategy(Town of Truckee, 2005) Political Support—List related MOUs, There is an active TAC for this project. agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.3280556 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Longitude: -120.1822222 Project Location Description (e.g.,along Along the main stem of the Truckee River in Downtown the south bank of stream/river Truckee, California from the confluence with Donner Creek between river miles or miles from through Downtown Truckee to Glenshire Bridge. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Will reduce sediment and Preliminary standards in accordance with the r Yes support the Truckee River estimate of 1,200 attainment date, and participate in N/A TMDL. tons of sediment the development of future TMDLs. reduction annually. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Will reduce sediment and Preliminary implementing measures such as r Yes support the Truckee River estimate of 1,200 stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A TMDL. tons of sediment control/restoration to meet Water reduction Quality Objectives(WQOs)for annually. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality The project includes water Implementation monitoring programs through r Yes quality monitoring, of 3+years of planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A coordinated with TRWC's water quality annually throughout the Region. ongoing water quality monitoring. monitoring efforts. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Will restore wetlands and Approximately 10 wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes riparian habitat. acres of wetlands to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A will be restored. processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. FV N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural F%O N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water Will restore wetlands and Approximately 10 bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes riparian habitat. acres of wetlands associated uplands to support healthy r N/A will be restored. watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement The project will include Weed programs to prevent the spread of Yes prevention practices for the management existing invasive species and r N/A spread of invasive species, improved along colonization of potential future coordinated with TRWC's 11 miles of the invasive species. existing invasive weed Truckee River. program. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F,/_ Yes Will address impacts from Stormwater caused by existing and new surrounding commercial and treatment development. r N/A residential development. improved along 11 miles of Truckee River. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Town of Truckee,Truckee Coordination with multiple jurisdictions within the Yes Donner Land Trust,Trout 6 stakeholder Region for information exchange. N/A Unlimited,Truckee Sanitation groups. District, USFS Truckee Ranger District,Truckee River Legacy Foundation. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and Project will include broad Engage awareness of watershed functions, r Yes public outreach. community protection and restoration needs to r N/A through at least 2 encourage stewardship by the public. site tours and one community work day. Create interpretive signage. IWM4- Promote activities that Floodplain will be increased Floodplain reduce flood risk. r Yes and protected at several function F N/A locations along the Truckee improved at 7 River. locations on Truckee River. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Project will improve habitat Approximately 10 water quality,water supply, r Yes and water quality and reduce acres of wetlands groundwater recharge,flood F N/A localized flood risk. will be restored. management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts Floodplain to continue improving the science. function improved at 7 locations on Truckee River. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Project will reduce sedimentation by climate change'. restoring wetlands and meadows. Project will reduce flood risk by improving floodplain function. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A The project will restore wetlands and emissions (e.g.green technology). meadows, improving GHG uptake. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A The project provides for improved not already mentioned elsewhere. recreational access that is environmentally appropriate. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes � No Urban Water Use Efficiency — Yes F7 No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F- Yes F7 No System Reoperation F- Yes F7 No Water Transfers F- Yes F7 No Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F_ Yes .v No Desalination r Yes FV_ No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes P No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes W No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes 1740 No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes W No Matching Water Quality to Use iy' Yes F No Will match water quality to instream and ecosystem use and drinking water use by reducing sedimentation. Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Will reduce sedimentation. Salt and Salinity Management F Yes W No Urban Runoff Management F Yes F No Project is located in downtown urban area. Will address impacts from stormwater runoff in Downtown Truckee. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes P No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes FYI No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F No Will restore meadows, wetlands and instream habitat. Forest Management F_ Yes ry-' No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes F No The project includes a partnership with the Town of Truckee and Town's planning efforts. Recharge Areas Protection F Yes F No Water-dependent Recreation F Yes F No The project will provide improved and sustainable river access. Watershed Management F4_0 Yes F No Project restores and enhances watershed function. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management W Yes F No Increased floodplain function will reduce impacts of localized flooding. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $250,000 $600,000 $300,000 $1,150,00 OR 0 DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $100,000 Planning,design and environmental compliance Phase 2 $1,000,000 Construction—can be phased. Phase 3 $50,000 Monitoring Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project 319 (h)funds $300,000 cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding Partner cost share— $850,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. highly likely 319h funds—highly likely Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation—highly likely Truckee River Fund— highly likely e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operations and maintenance costs will be minimal. will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Cost is based on restoration projects of similar scope planning, bid,etc.) and scale. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Severe erosion will continue. Every year restoration the project is not funded. (300 words or less) is delayed implementation costs increase due to the increase in damage. Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F_ Yes Proposed assessment will April 2018 Evaluation X FV_ No be completed in 2018. F N/A b. Final Design 7 Yes Final design will be October June 2018 X FV_ No completed in 2018 2017 F N/A c. Environmental F Yes Will be completed in July 2018 December Documentation F FV_ 2018. 2018 (CEQA/NEPA) No F_ N/A d. Permitting F_ Yes Will be completed in January May 2019 F F" No 2019 2019 F_ N/A e. Construction 7 Yes Will be started in 2019. May June 2021 Contracting - No Construction may span 2019 several years. F N/A f. Construction F Yes Will be started in 2019 July 2019 October Implementation F F"- No and may be phased over 2021 several years. F N/A Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River Sediment TMDL project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General (LRWQCB, 2008), Lahontan Basin Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Plan, Coordinated Watershed Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Management Strategy, updated project list (TRWC, 2014),Town of Truckee b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Truckee River Revitalization feasibility of this project Assessment (TRWC, 2018), McIver Dairy restoration plan (TRWC, 2018) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much A formal assessment and restoration research has been conducted) of the proposed project in opportunities plan has been 300 words or less. developed. Conceptual design plans for one meadow restoration site are complete. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID xYes techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The project will incorporate LID techniques to naturally treat stormwater entering the Truckee River. Construction will use on-site materials to the greatest extent possible. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Beth Christman Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568 E-mail bchristman@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### (530)550-8760 Other Cooperating Trust for Public Land, U.S. Forest Service Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Sardine Meadow Restoration Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater FV_ Restoration F_ Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The goal of the Sardine Meadow Restoration project is to (Briefly describe the project, in 300 restore hydrologic and geomorphic function to a degraded words or less) meadow system. This goal will be met through the following objectives: -conduct pre-project assessment to better understand the root causes of degradation -finalize a restoration design plan -implement pre-project hydrologic and vegetation monitoring -complete construction of watershed restoration project -monitor project area for success and adaptive management needs The Sardine Meadow project will result in 350 acres of restored meadow. The project will reduce erosion, improve wildlife habitat, and improve water quality. Total number of projects 14 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 7 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes—Truckee River Sediment TMDL(LRWQCB, 2008), Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River Coordinated Watershed If so provide description. Management Strategy(TRWC, 2014), Davies Merrill Tahoe Sierra IRWM Watershed Restoration Plan (USFS, 2003). Political Support—List related MOUs, A formal agreement is in place between TRWC and the Trust agreements or TACs currently in place. for Public Land. Project Location: Latitude: 39.51409 Longitude: -120.1251 Project Location Description (e.g.,along Sardine Meadow is located in the Merrill-Davies watershed, the south bank of stream/river north of Stampede Reservoir. Davies Creek runs through between river miles or miles from Sardine Meadow. The project would address the central Towns/intersection and/or address): portion of Sardine Meadow—both the upper and lower ends of Sardine Meadow have already been restored. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Sardine Meadow Estimated standards in accordance with the P-0 Yes project helps meet TMDL sediment load attainment date, and participate in standards by reducing reduction up to N/A the development of future TMDLs. sediment loading to the 100 tons/year. Truckee River.The Truckee River is 303(d) listed for excess sediment and a TMDL has been adopted (LRWQCB, 2008). WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The Sardine Meadow Project Estimated implementing measures such as r Yes would reduce erosion from sediment load stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A over two miles of stream reduction up to control/restoration to meet Water channel.The Truckee River is 100 tons/year. Quality Objectives(WQOs)for 303(d) listed for excess receiving water bodies established in sediment.The projects will the Basin Plan within the planning help meet the WQO for horizon. turbidity in the Little Truckee River HU. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Restoration actions focus on Two miles of wetlands, riparian and upland areas P Yes restoring incised streams to actively eroding to re-establish natural water filtering F N/A stable channels on the stream channel processes. meadow surface to treated. improve infiltration 350 acres of through increased meadows overbank flow. restored. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F7 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor F_ Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Watershed function, wildlife 350 acres of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and FV Yes habitat, and instream habitat restored meadow associated uplands to support healthy r N/A will be restored through watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife implementation. and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement The restoration plan will 350 acres of programs to prevent the spread of r Yes contain provisions for meadow existing invasive species and F N/A preventing the spread of protected from colonization of potential future adjoining invasive plant invasive plants. invasive species. species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Project will take place in Collaboration multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes collaboration with USFS and with 2 partner Region for information exchange. r N/A Trust for Public Land organizations Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and We will engage the public Two site tours, awareness of watershed functions, r Yes through site tours and hands- 10 protection and restoration needs to F N/A on work days. Revegetation people per tour encourage stewardship by the public. will take place on Truckee Two years of River Day-an annual Truckee River Day volunteer work day. projects, 20 people per year. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes FV N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The project will restore 350 acres of water quality,water supply, r Yes natural meadow function and restored meadow groundwater recharge,flood r N/A hydrology, improving management) in local and regional resilience to withstand planning efforts and support efforts impacts of climate change. to continue improving the science. Climate change will be integrated into project design through Climate Smart workshop with Point Blue. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in 17- Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A The project is located within Sierra County, a DAC. The project will benefit Sierra County through road improvements and scenic improvement. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. r N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A More resilient watersheds will be climate change'. better able to withstand the impacts of climate change. Restoring meadows and stream channels in the Dry Creek watershed would provide enormous benefit through better flood flow attenuation as precipitation shifts from snow to rain. Climate change considerations are being incorporated into project design. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Improved meadow hydrology will emissions (e.g.green technology). increase vegetation cover and vigor. After restoration, meadow vegetation will sequester more soil carbon and uptake more greenhouse gases than prior to restoration. Research on other Sierra Meadows indicate that this benefit could be significant. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes .V No Urban Water Use Efficiency F Yes W No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfer Conveyance- Regional/local r- Yes No System Reoperation F Yes No Water Tra nsfe rs F Yes r No ncrease ater Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes Fy-' No Desalination Yes FV- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water Yes P No Surface Storage -- Regional/Local F Yes FY-1 No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes W No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F No The project will improve water quality through improved infiltration. Pollution Prevention F Yes F No The Truckee River is listed as impaired for excess sediment.The project will reduce the sediment load to the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management F Yes r No Urban Runoff Management F Yes Fy-' No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F40- Yes F No The restored meadow will likely be grazed in the future, with protections in place. Grazing will be less damaging in the restored system. Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes F No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration Fy' Yes F- No The project will improve ecosystem processes through restoring wetlands, stream channels, meadows, and upland areas. Forest Management Yes ry-1 No Land Use Planning and Management W Yes r- No Future grazing will be managed to protect the restored meadow. Recharge Areas Protection W Yes r- No The restored meadow will improve shallow groundwater recharge.The Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? restoration plan includes protection of the meadow. Water-dependent Recreation Yes F No Watershed Management F Yes F No The project complements the Davies- Merrill Watershed Restoration Plan developed by the U.S. Forest Service. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes F No The project will provide flood attenuation. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $800,000 $150,000 $950,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes I No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $200,000 Planning, Design, and Environmental Compliance $600,000 Construction Phase 2 Phase 3 $200,000 Post-project Monitoring and Adaptive Management Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project National Fish and $150,000 cost Wildlife Foundation d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operations and maintenance costs will be minimal. will be financed for the 25-year planning The meadow restoration project is designed to period for project implementation (not grant function with little to no intervention after the funded). initial adaptive management period. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Previous experience with similar projects planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes V No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Meadow degradation and water quality impacts the project is not funded. (300 words or less) will continue. Implementation costs will rise as degradation becomes more severe. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants: Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation, Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes xYes Assessment of project 1/1/2016 6/30/2018 Evaluation F site condition, x F No establishment of pre- F N/A project monitoring program, restoration concept development, stakeholder coordination b. Final Design F Yes XNo 6/30/201 3/31/2019 8 F F N/A c. Environmental F Yes A Mitigated Negative Dec 9/1/2017 1/30/2018 Documentation F x was adopted by (CEQA/NEPA) F No Lahontan Regional Water F N/A Quality Control Board. NEPA is not required for this project. d. Permitting F Yes xNo We have started project 9/1/2017 3/31/2019 permitting xF F No F N/A e. Construction F Yes 5/1/2019 6/1/2019 Contracting F F No Xno F N/A f. Construction F Yes 8/1/2019 10/31/2019 Implementation F F No xno F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River Sediment TMDL project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General (LRWQCB, 2008), Lahontan Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Basin Plan, Coordinated Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Watershed Management Strategy, updated project list (TRWC, 2014), Sierra Nevada Meadows Business Plan (NFWF, 2010). b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Merrill Davies watershed feasibility of this project assessment and restoration design plans (USFS, 2003). c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much TRWC and the USFS have partnered research has been conducted) of the proposed project in to restore eight meadows within the 300 words or less. Merrill Davies watershed, including Sardine Meadow upstream and downstream of the project location. These projects were all identified in the Merrill Davies watershed assessment. The projects have been very successful, and the Sardine Meadow project will build upon the knowledge gained from implementing these projects. A conceptual design for Sardine Meadow is completed. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. xF Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe This project is designed to use native materials and balance cut/ fill on-site, reducing the need to import or export and dispose of material. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No r N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization University of California, Davis-Tahoe Environmental Research Center Name of Primary Contact Dr. Geoffrey Schladow Name of Secondary Contact Mr. Zachary Hymanson Mailing Address Tahoe Environmental Research Center Watershed Science Center University of California One Shields Ave. Davis, CA 95616 E-mail gschladow@ucdavis.edu Phone (###)###-#### (530)752-3942 Other Cooperating Tahoe Water Supplier's Association; Lake Tahoe Marina Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Association; California Tahoe Conservancy;Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Development of tools to predict the occurrence of aquatic invasive species (AIS) along Lake Tahoe's nearshore Project Category F_ Water Supply/Wastewater F-0 Restoration F Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The transport of AIS in Lake Tahoe's nearshore currents is a (Briefly describe the project, in 300 primary means of AIS range expansion. This is an early words or less) detection/rapid response project to expand nearshore current modeling work to the north and west shores of Lake Tahoe.This work has previously been completed for the south shore (Hoyer et al., 2015). The resulting model is in the public domain, and it can be used to predict the distribution of clam veligers or plant fragments given the existing distribution of established infestations. This model also has been used to assess the transport of drinking water pollutants and pathogens for the Tahoe Water Suppliers Association. Coupling the application of this model with regular early detection and habitat suitability surveys would provide the tools and information agencies need to operate a cost-effective, and comprehensive AIS early detection program in Lake Tahoe. Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Tahoe Sierra IRWM Does this project contribute to a larger The results of this project would contribute a tool of use to Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? the EIP aquatic invasive species focus area. The resulting If so provide description. tool also would be useful for TRPA's shorezone assessment, as well as emerging questions about changes in nearshore water quality. The results of this project also contribute to Tahoe Water Suppliers needs for a tool to assess the potential for drinking water pollutants and pathogens to enter the drinking water systems serving other population centers around Lake Tahoe. Political Support—List related MOUs, Aquatic Invasive Species Coordinating Committee agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 39.0917 N Longitude: 120.0417 W Project Location Description (e.g.,along Along the north shore of Lake Tahoe From Incline Village to the south bank of stream/river the Truckee River outlet (Tahoe City), and along the west between river miles or miles from shore from the Truckee River outlet to Emerald Bay. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water The resulting model can be supplied by public water systems r Yes used by water purveyors to continues to meet Federal and State r N/A assess the potential for standards. pollutant and pathogen contamination, particularly in response to a spill, sewage discharge, or mass release into Lake Tahoe. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas 17- Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. P N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F_ Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy F N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement The resulting model will programs to prevent the spread of r Yes allow agencies to assess the existing invasive species and r N/A potential future spread of colonization of potential future existing invasive species, invasive species. given their current distribution. Combining the use of this model with regular surveys can help agencies prioritize projects to treat new occurrences, and prevent the further spread of existing invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Model output would provide multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes information of use to both Region for information exchange. F N/A habitat and resource managers, and regulatory staff thereby increasing the opportunity for broader collaboration. IWM3 - Increase public education and Model output could be awareness of watershed functions, Yes shared with the public to protection and restoration needs to r N/A help them understand (and encourage stewardship by the public. support) agency priorities for controlling the spread of existing invasive species. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes r N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood F N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A This project would provide information for the region of Lake Tahoe adjacent to the disadvantaged communities of Kings Beach and Brockway, California c. Environmental Justice'considerations. F7 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A climate change'. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes P No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes FV- No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local Yes Fv- No System Reoperation F- Yes FV- No Water Transfers r Yes Fv- No Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F- Yes .v No Desalination r Yes W No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes P No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes W No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and 1740 Yes F No The modeling tool could help water Distribution purveyors with the timing and extent of alterations in drinking water treatment and distribution, in the face of a disaster. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes Fv-O No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes 17 No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Salt and Salinity Management F Yes W No Urban Runoff Management F Yes F No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes F No Economic Incentives(Loans, Grants, and F Yes 1740 No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes F No The modeling tool could help agency managers prioritize the treatment of existing invasive species in Lake Tahoe. Forest Management F Yes P07 No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes r No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes ry-1 No Water-dependent Recreation F Yes W No Watershed Management F Yes ry-1 No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes ry-1 No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage-CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $180,000 $ $180,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes I No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $90,000 Develop model for the north shore Phase 2 $90,000 Develop model for the west shore. Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project None cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding Tahoe Sierra IRWM $180,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs N/A will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, conceptual planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes v No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Developing a model of water motion and currents the project is not funded. (300 words or less) in the nearshore of Lake Tahoe will be invaluable to addressing a multitude of issues that confront resource and land managers. The continued absence of such a tool will require managers to use less effective approaches to address these issues with increased uncertainty. In the long-run the cost of continuing to use these inferior approaches could exceed the cost of model development. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants: Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes Evaluation F F No x /A b. Final Design F Yes F F No D /A c. Environmental F Yes Documentation F F No (CEQA/NEPA) ��/A d. Permitting F Yes F F No x N/A e. Construction F Yes Contracting F F No x N/A f. Construction F Yes Implementation F F No FIN/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Aquatic invasive species project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat management plan for Lake Tahoe. Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Hoyer, A.B., S.G. Schladow, and F.J. feasibility of this project Rueda. 2015. Local dispersion of nonmotile invasive bivalve species by wind-driven lake currents. Limnology and Oceanography. 10046:1-17. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The scientific basis for this project is research has been conducted) of the proposed project in well established. See Hoyer, et al., 300 words or less. 2015 for details. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes F No x N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No I x N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No Lx]N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No x N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No x N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No x N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No x N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No x N/A subject basin? 11 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Alpine County Name of Primary Contact Gavin Feiger, AWG Program Manager Name of Secondary Contact Brian Peters, Alpine County Development Director Mailing Address 50 Diamond Valley Road Markleeville, CA 96120 E-mail alpinewatershed@gmail.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-694-2327 Other Cooperating Alpine Watershed Group, Markleeville Public Utility District Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Markleeville Creek Floodplain Restoration Project Project Category XWater Supply/Wastewater 9- Restoration %0 Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The project will 1) restore the natural stream channel and (Briefly describe the project, in 300 floodplain to improve geomorphic function and reconnect words or less) the stream to its historic floodplain, and 2) relocate and replace aging sewer infrastructure in the floodplain to reduce the threat of water quality impairments from flooding and sewer leaks, 3) construct a storm water capture and infiltration system for highway runoff, and 4) provide public access and recreations features including walking trails and interpretive signage. Total number of projects 1 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 of 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes, this implementation is Phase 2 and 3 of 3. It is also a Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? restoration priority of Carson River Watershed Adaptive If so provide description. Stewardship Plan (2017) and Carson River Watershed Floodplain Management Plan (2008). It also achieves the Markleeville PUD's sewer facility safety assessment and remediation plans. The project is also a component of the Alpine County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Political Support—List related MOUs, MOU with Alpine Watershed Group and Markleeville Public agreements or TACs currently in place. Utility District; MOU with U.S. Forest and Bureau of Land Management regarding land transfer and restoration; Tahoe Sierra IRWM Technical Advisory Committee involved in design review and project planning Project Location: Latitude: N 38.694861 Longitude: W 119.777972 Project Location Description (e.g.,along the south bank of stream/river Along the northwest bank of Markleeville Creek,just between river miles or miles from downstream (east) of Highway 89 bridge in the town of Towns/intersection and/or address): Markleeville. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with F Yes the attainment date, and F N/A participate in the development of future TMDLs. WQ2— Reduce pollutant loads Project will reduce the threat of by implementing measures such 'V Yes water quality impairments from as stormwater LID retrofits, F_ N/A flooding and sewer leaks; project erosion control/restoration to will install storm water treatment meet Water Quality Objectives system for Highway 89 runoff; (WQOs) for receiving water restored floodplain will spread and bodies established in the Basin slow water flows effectively Plan within the planning horizon. reducing erosion and allow trapping of sediments/nutrients during overbank events AWG Project Template Page 2 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) WQ3 - Implement water quality Project involves stream monitoring monitoring programs through Yes component since 2006, involving planning horizon, and F N/A stream bioassessment (benthic coordinate annually throughout macroinvertebrates and riparian the Region. habitat) and chemical monitoring for pre and post-project comparison WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water F Yes systems continues to meet r N/A Federal and State standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded Project site lacks stream bank, 1 acre of streams,wetlands, riparian and R Yes riparian and upland vegetation due floodplain upland areas to re-establish r N/A to past development and reconstructed natural water filtering processes. alteration; Restored floodplain will and riparian reestablish natural water filtering vegetation processes, provide ecological restored benefits of overbanking and establish biogeochemical cycling WQ6-Operate and maintain, Project will replace aging sewer 700 linear feet of build, or replace infrastructure r Yes infrastructure, eliminate all new sewer line for reliable collection,treatment r N/A manholes in the floodplain and through the and disposal of wastewater. reduce the threat of water quality floodplain;4 new impairments from flooding and manholes located sewer leaks outside the floodplain WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a r Yes 20-year planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure Yes to reliably supply water. F N/A AWG Project Template Page 3 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures Yes and practices to meet state W N/A goals. GWM1- Maintain and monitor r Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high r Yes quality groundwater, and F N/A advocate for improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water Project will enhance degraded 400 linear feet of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas Fv Yes streams to support healthy native streambank and associated uplands to F N/A fish population; reestablishing stabilized; 1 acre support healthy watersheds, riparian environment will provide of floodplain viable native fish, wildlife and important wildlife habitat and restored plant habitats. travel corridors; project will recover lost habitat due to site development ER2 - Develop and implement Project involves site monitoring 5 acres programs to prevent the spread r Yes and stewardship to prevent any monitored for of existing invasive species and F N/A future infestation weed-free status colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private F Yes landowners, activities to manage r N/A forest health and wildfire risks. AWG Project Template Page 4 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem Sewer system improvements will 700 linear feet of impacts caused b existing and Yes reduce potential for leaks; phase 1 p y g p new sewer line new development. F N/A of the project involved relocating through the the USFS facility and removing floodplain;4 new existing structures from the site; manholes located phase 2 will consist of sewer system modifications; and phase 3 outside the will remove floodwall which floodplain; 250 channelizes stream and increases linear feet of water velocity and bank erosion; floodwall project will revegetate erodible removed; 2 acres soils of land revegetated IWM1 -Conduct local and Project applies proven stream and 2007 Markleeville regional water-related planning r Yes floodplain restoration practices; Creek Restoration activities within the planning r N/A Technical Advisory Committee Design Report horizon as supported by current guiding all aspects of project design and 2013 Design and future watershed science. and implementation Plan provide scientific basis IWM2 - Ensure collaboration Collaboration is an integral part of 8 natural among multiple jurisdictions r Yes the project given the multi resource agencies within the Region for F N/A components of the project— and community information exchange. stream restoration, sewer, and groups public recreation/education;the represented on Technical Advisory Committee Technical provides diverse professional input; Advisory public outreach efforts offer Committee valuable community representation AWG Project Template Page 5 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public Public education component of 10 watershed education and awareness of Yes project will engage community and stewards watershed functions, protection F N/A visitors in learning about monitoring site; and restoration needs to watershed resources and hands-on 30 volunteers encourage stewardship by the activities to assist with restoration assisting with public. and natural resource protection; maintenance; volunteers will also be involved in increased natural long-term project stewardship resource through annual restoration projects awareness of 100 and ongoing site monitoring community members and visitor IWM4- Promote activities that Existing flood wall has exacerbated 250 linear feet of reduce flood risk. lv Yes flooding condition at the site and floodwall r N/A accelerated bank failure removed; 1 acre downstream; reconstructed of floodplain floodplain will permit for reconstructed overbanking and alleviate current flood hazards; project will reduce risk of sewer system inundation due to flooding and reduce risk of sewer pipe failure; reduce flood risk IWM5 -Address climate change Restored floodplain will allow 1 acre of (e.g. water quality, water supply, W Yes stream corridor to accommodate floodplain groundwater recharge,flood F N/A variable flood flows;floodplain will reconstructed management) in local and offer some water storage and and riparian regional planning efforts and attenuate stream flow; improved vegetation support efforts to continue stream bank and riparian area restored improving the science. vegetation will provide a carbon bank IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities r Yes in order to improve coordination r N/A with regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: AWG Project Template Page 6 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A Project is being planned in partnership with considerations. Washoe Tribe; representative from Washoe Environmental Protection Department serves on Technical Advisory Committee; working to integrate native American historical and cultural interpretive signs b. Disadvantaged Community r N/A This project is within the Markleeville PUD considerations'. service area which is a disadvantaged community evidenced by an income survey conducted in 2017. c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects r N/A Project will help mitigate potential long- of climate change'. term impacts of climate change as described in IWMS e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse r N/A gas emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that r N/A The local Markleeville community has been are not already mentioned elsewhere. requesting improvements to the popular and visible site in the center of their town for years.This project would address most of those requests. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm AWG Project Template Page 7 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency Yes FV_ No Urban Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local F_ Yes F No System Reoperation F_ Yes 17 No Water Transfers F Yes r No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes Fv- No Desalination Yes FV_ No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes FV_ No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes FY-1 No Improve Water Quality dft Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes FV_ No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes r No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes r No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Reduced erosion due to stream channelization and decaying floodwall; reduce potential for sewage leaks/spills Salt and Salinity Management Yes Fy-' No Urban Runoff Management FV_ Yes F_ No Storm water treatment system for highway runoff will be installed Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes P07 No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes FV_ No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration Yes No Provides multiple environmental benefits (chemical, biological, geomorphic and hydrologic) Forest Management F_ Yes FV_ No Land Use Planning and Management Fy-' Yes F_ No Project has been integrated into downtown Markleeville bike and pedestrian plans; helps meet ordinances of the County Code; meets long-standing commitment with U.S. Forest Service to reclaim and remediate property AWG Project Template Page 8 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Recharge Areas Protection F_ Yes FV_ No Water-dependent Recreation FV_ Yes F_ No Will offer stream access, riparian walking trails and natural resource interpretive signage Watershed Management FV_ Yes F_ No High priority restoration project; addressed in multiple watershed management plans Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management FV_ Yes F_ No Alleviates and mitigates flood impacts Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: AWG Project Template Page 9 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non-State Cost Share: Total Cost Grant Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Funding Fund Source Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $1,750,000 $50,000 $1,800,000 OR F_ DAC 2. Annual Operations and $5-10,000 annually for Maintenance (O&M) general maintenance b.Can the Project be phased? v Yes F_ No 1. If so provide cost Project O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Cost Phase 1 Complete Relocate the USFS facility and remove existing structures from the site Phase 2 $600,000 MPUD role Sewer system modifications Phase 3 $1,400,000 $0 Site restoration and sewer activation Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s)of funding for Project District Attorney Trust $27,000 cost Fund d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured Alpine Watershed $23,000 funding and certainty of the sources for Group and County staff Project cost. time e.Explain how operation and maintenance Covered by additional grant funding and partner match costs will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Technical Specifications for Sewer and Restoration planning, bid,etc.) Design Plans g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been FV_ Yes F_ No completed? h.Please describe what impact there may be If this project were not to proceed,the existing if the project is not funded. (300 words or condition of the project site would continue to less) jeopardize water quality and the integrity of the stream channel. The floodwall and stream banks will continue to degrade and jeopardize the stability of the sewer lines through that area. Also the sewer manholes will remain in the floodplain and will risk flooding and sewer leaks. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement,Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. AWG Project Template Page 10 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Planned/Act Planned/ Current Activities in Each ual Start Actual Project Project Stage Date Completion Stage (mm/yr) Date(mm/yr) a. Assessment and XYes Preliminary planning, December Evaluation F F No community outreach 2013 and project assessment F_ Yes F N/A b. Final Design XYeS Sewer and Restoration December F F No Design Plans complete 2014 F N/A c. Environmental XYes Project Description, December Documentation F F No Initial Study and 2014 (CEQA/NEPA) Mitigated Negative N/A Declaration complete d. Permitting F Yes Necessary permitting January August 2017 X XNo packages being 2017 developed F N/A e. Construction F Yes January May 2018 Contracting F XNo 2018 F N/A f. Construction F Yes June 2018 December Implementation F XNo 2019 F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status AWG Project Template Page 11 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the Upper Carson River Watershed Stream Corridor proposed project is consistent with or Condition Assessment (2004), Carson River supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan (2017), GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Carson River Watershed Floodplain Management Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Plan (2008) b. List technical reports and studies supporting 2007 Markleeville Creek Restoration Design the feasibility of this project Report and 2013 Design Plan provide hydro- geomorphic analysis and modeling c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. Environmental consultants have conducted how much research has been conducted) of hydraulic and geomorphic assessment, collected the proposed project in 300 words or less. supplemental observations of site geomorphology, hydraulics and vegetation, validated flood model for existing conditions and done engineering review of sewer system modifications. As mentioned above, the project has been identified as a restoration priority in multiple watershed assessments. d. Does the project implement green r Yes F No XN/A technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water F Yes F No F N/A Management Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter F Yes F No F N/A requirements(CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions F Yes F No F N/A above is"no", do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an F Yes F No 7 N/A AWMP (due 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an F Yes F No F N/A AWMP prior to receiving project Provide Explanation if necessary: funding? AWG Project Template Page 12 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and F_ Yes F No F N/A submitted for the subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within F Yes r No r N/A 1 year of the grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. AWG Project Template Page 13 of 13 3.14.18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization City of South Lake Tahoe Name of Primary Contact Jason Burke, Stormwater Program Coordinator Name of Secondary Contact Luis Garcia, Maintenance Technician Lead Mailing Address 1052 Tata Ln, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail jburke@cityofslt.us, Igarcia@citvofslt.us Phone (###)###-#### (530) 542-6038, (530) 542-6081 Other Cooperating South Tahoe Public Utility District Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes,the City is dedicated to improving landscape irrigation committed to the project through efficiency. completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title City of South Lake Tahoe Landscape Irrigation Efficiency Upgrades Project Category F X Water Supply/Wastewater Restoration , Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The project includes updating the City's landscape irrigation (Briefly describe the project, in 300 system to include modern controls that have the ability to words or less) regulate irrigation timing and frequency based on current weather forecasts, evapotranspiration rates and soil moisture. Smart controller systems can also include flow control shut-offs to ensure leaks or maintenance issues do not result in waste. By upgrading the City's landscape irrigations systems, a large amount of potable water can be conserved. Total number of projects submitted by 1 of 1 Project Prioritization: your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this project 1 (e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a Yes,this project contributes to the AB1420 and the SBX7-7 (20 larger Project (e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase percent water reduction by 2020) as mandated by the State of 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. California. Political Support—List related None MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 38.942624 Longitude: -119.974029 Project Location Description (e.g., The project area includes the entire City of South Lake Tahoe, along the south bank of including approximately 44 various landscape irrigation systems Tahoe Sierra IRWM stream/river between river miles or operated by the City. miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the F Yes attainment date, and participate in R_ N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as F Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion (✓ N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F7 N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State W N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering W N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F1_ N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. R- N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. R- N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water The use of smart irrigation The use of smart conservation measures and practices Ro- Yes controllers will reduce controllers will to meet state goals. F N/A irrigation waste and increase assist the City in efficiency to meet state meeting state goals. mandated water use reductions. GWM1- Maintain and monitor F- Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. W N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural W N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy F N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and F N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and IV N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. W N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as P1_ N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. W N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to P1_ N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes W N/A Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Use of smart controllers will The use of smart water quality,water supply, Fv Yes reduce water demand and controllers will groundwater recharge,flood F N/A use for irrigation of City assist the City in management) in local and regional landscape areas. Using meeting state planning efforts and support efforts current technology to include mandated water to continue improving the science. weather forecasts, soil use reductions. moisture content and evapotranspiration will enable the City to be more climate resilient. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with Pl- N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community R- N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F N/A The IRWM Disadvantaged Communities Mapping Tool identifies the entire City of South Lake Tahoe as a Disadvantaged Community (Place ID#063108). The tool indicates the Median Household Income (MHI) in the City is$41,004,while the Statewide MHI is$61,094 for the same data set. The City MHI is 67%of the Statewide MHI,well below the 80% threshold. c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. Pl- N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F N/A Use of smart controllers will reduce climate change'. water demand and use for irrigation of City landscape areas. Using current technology to include weather forecasts, soil moisture content and evapotranspiration will enable the City to be more climate resilient.The use of smart controllers will assist the City in meeting state mandated water use reductions. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas I✓ N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are W N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand JL Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes F No Urban Water Use Efficiency F Yes F No The project includes updating the City's landscape irrigation system to include modern controls that have the ability to regulate irrigation timing and frequency based on current weather forecasts, evapotranspiration and soil moisture. Smart controller systems can also include flow control shut-offs to ensure leaks or maintenance issues do not result in waste. By upgrading the City's landscape irrigations systems, a large amount of potable water can be conserved. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F Yes F No System Reoperation F Yes F%I_ No Water Tra nsfe rs F Yes F No ncrease Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes F No Desalination F Yes F No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes F No Surface Storage-- Regional/Local I- Yes v No mprove Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes F No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Salt and Salinity Management F Yes F No Urban Runoff Management FV Yes F No Smart controller systems can also include flow control shut-offs to ensure leaks or maintenance issues do not result in waste. By upgrading the City's landscape irrigations systems, excess irrigation runoff containing nutrients can be eliminated from City landscape areas. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes . No Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Economic Incentives(Loans, Grants, and F Yes F No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes F No Forest Management F Yes F No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes F No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes F No Water-dependent Recreation F Yes F No Watershed Management F Yes F No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes F No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1,000,000 $ TBD 1,000,000 OR Y DAC 2. Annual Operations and $1,000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fv- Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $500,000 $1,000 Primary Zones Phase 2 $500,000 $1,000 Secondary Zones Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project None cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M will be funded by current landscape will be financed for the 25-year planning maintenance General Funds and water savings. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if The City will continue to operate piecemeal system the project is not funded. (300 words or less) and seek opportunities to gradually update the fragmented controls,which often require manual shutdown in advance of each precipitation event. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes TBD Evaluation XF F No F N/A b. Final Design F Yes TBD F F No F N/A c. Environmental r Yes TBD Documentation F r No (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F Yes TBD F F No F N/A e. Construction r Yes TBD Contracting F r No F N/A f. Construction F Yes TBD Implementation F F No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed NA project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the None feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Landscape irrigation efficiency is a research has been conducted) of the proposed project in widely known approach to reducing 300 words or less. water use. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. XF Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID 1.If so please describe Green technology includes the use of smart controllers for landscape irrigation efficiency. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A X Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A X 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A X (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No F N/A X do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A X 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A X to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No F N/A X subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes No N/A grant submittal date? X 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Lukins Brothers Water Company, Inc. Name of Primary Contact Jennifer Lukins Name of Secondary Contact -- Mailing Address 2031 West Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail jennifer@lukinswater.com Phone(###)###-#### 530-541-2606 Other Cooperating -- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Meter Conversion Project Category F- Restoration F- Storm Water/Flood Control r Waste Water/ Water Supply Project Description On October 11, 2009,the California State Assembly passed Assembly (Briefly describe the project, in Bill (AB) 975,which among other things, requires all water companies 300 words or less) with 500 service connections or more to convert to water meters by year 2025. The California Public Utilities Commission modified its code Section 781 to reflect this law. Of Lukins 962 current customers, only 62 have meters. Lukins meter conversion program is to install new water meters at 900 service locations. Lukins Water is a privately owned water utility.This disqualifies Lukins from the majority of available grant funding, leaving the burden of infrastructure upgrades primarily on the ratepayers. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes,this project contributes to compliance with AB 975 which a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, requires all water companies with 500 or more connections to meter EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so customers by 2025. provide description. Political Support—List related City of South Lake Tahoe Franchise Agreement, Lahontan MOU,TRPA MOUs, agreements or TACs MOU currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description The meter conversion project is located within the water service (e.g., along the south bank of territory of Lukins Brothers Water Company Inc., in South Lake Tahoe, stream/river between river CA. Tahoe Sierra IRWM miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL 30MG water standards in accordance with the r Yes addresses urban runoff from saved annually by attainment date, and participate in F_ irrigation because the installing meters the development of future TMDLs. installation of water meters will reduce urban N/A promotes overall water runoff. conservation. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project promotes water 30MG of water implementing measures such as r Yes conservation and will reduce saved will reduce stormwater LID retrofits, erosion over watering,which will pollutant loads by control/restoration to meet Water reduce water runoff and reducing excess Quality Objectives (WQOs)for N/A pollutant loads into storm watering. receiving water bodies established in drains. the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3- Implement water quality Installation of water meters 30MG of water monitoring programs through r Yes reduces the burden of saved annually planning horizon, and coordinate F_ demand to water aquifers, through meters annually throughout the Region. which protects water quality. improves water N/A quality. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water Water meters allows the 30MG of water supplied by public water systems r Yes provider to monitor water saved annually continues to meet Federal and State production and consumption, meets Federal standards. and makes detecting leaks and State N/A much easier. Drinking water standards for supply becomes more water protected. conservation. Project Template Page 2 of 10 03/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM WQ5- Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r-N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r-N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet This project reduces the 30MG of water projected demands for a 20-year r Yes demand on water supply and saved annually planning horizon. F promotes water will increase conservation,which helps to ability to meet N/A meet future demands. projected demands. WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or Installation of new water 20MG of water replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes meters make water system savings annually supply water. F operations more efficient will reduce and reliable. demand on water N/A supply. WS3 - Implement and promote water AB975 was created to 20MG of water conservation measures and practices r Yes promote statewide water saved annually to meet state goals. conservation.The installation meets of water meters is the key conservation N/A component in this bill. goals. GWM1-Maintain and monitor r Yes Water meters promote water 20MG of water groundwater supply to assure future conservation which lessens saved annually reliability. F the demand on aquifers will maintain N/A which aids in maintaining groundwater future supply. supply for future. GWM2 -Promote groundwater The public will receive 20MG of water protection activities for high quality F Yes notification about water saved annually groundwater,and advocate for meter installation and will maintain improvements to impacted educated how wasting water groundwater groundwater quality through public N/A will affect their rates. The supply for future. education. public will be educated on Educating the how to make home public will aid in improvements that would achieving this save water and save them savings. money. Project Template Page 3 of 10 03/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM GWM3 -Manage groundwater for Water conservation manages 20MG of water multiple uses (e.g. r Yes groundwater sources for saved annually municipal/industrial/agricultural multiple uses. Decreased helps manage supply and environmental use). residential demand will allow groundwater for N/A for increased supply for other multiple uses. multiple uses,that would be otherwise unavailable. ER1- Enhance and restore water Installation of water meters 20MG of water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes will promote water saved annually associated uplands to support healthy conservation which will allow will allow for watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife aquifers to replenish water to be and plant habitats. N/A themselves and support available to help healthy watersheds. enhance and restore environments. ER2- Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and r /A colonization of potential future N invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. r N/A ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts r Yes Water Conservation will -- caused by existing and new reduce outdoor watering development. F which will minimize N/A ecosystem impacts caused by new and existing developments. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as supported by current and future r N/A watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among -- -- multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. r-N/A Project Template Page 4 of 10 03/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to encourage stewardship by the public. r N/A IWM4-Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes r-N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water meters and -- water quality,water supply, r Yes conservation contribute to groundwater recharge, flood maintaining an adequate management) in local and regional supply of aquifers. planning efforts and support efforts N/A to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, Water meters allow for -- release and exchange activities in FO- Yes monitoring water order to improve coordination with r consumption which will aid in regional planning. monitoring water storage N/A and usage. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F N/A South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F N/A Water meters promote conservation climate change3. which aids in reduction of usage during drought times. Also the reduction of outdoor water reduces water run off and erosion. Project Template Page 5 of 10 03/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Water conservation leads to less emissions(e.g.green technology). water production and distribution. Water production and distribution is one of the highest energy users in the country. Saving the energy for distribution will contribute to greenhouse gas reduction. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F1'-' Yes F No Water meters promote the use of water efficiency. Urban Water Use Efficiency F1'-' Yes r No Water meters promote the use of water efficiency. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance - Regional/local F Yes Fv- No -- System Reoperation F Yes F-'- No Water Transfers F Yes F-'- No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater Yes F- No -- Desalination F Yes F-'- No -- Precipitation Enhancement F Yes R- No -- Recycled Municipal Water F Yes F-'- No -- Surface Storage-- Regional/ Local F Yes F No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and P Yes F- No -- Distribution Project Template Page 6 of 10 03/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation Yes F_ No -- Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes No -- Pollution Prevention F-'- Yes F_ No Water meters reduce over watering. Salt and Salinity Management F Yes No -- Urban Runoff Management Fl-,' Yes F_ No -- Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes r No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes F No -- Forest Management F Yes W No -- Land Use Planning and Management F Yes W No -- Recharge Areas Protection F Yes F No -- Water-dependent Recreation F Yes r No -- Watershed Management R' Yes F No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes r No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage-CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 10 03/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 3,300,000.00 XF- DAC 0 3,300,000 10%available 2. Annual Operations and $20,000 0 3,300,000 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? r Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 1,100,000 200,000(20 year Water Meter Conversion replacement) Phase 1 Phase 2 1,100,000 200,000(20 year Water Meter Conversion replacement) Phase 2 Phase 3 1,100,000 200,000(20 year Water Meter Conversion replacement) Phase 3 Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be provided will be financed for the 25-year planning by Lukins Water Company general operation and period for project implementation (not grant maintenance budget. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Contractor pricing planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F Yes r No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Installation of water meters is required by law. If the project is not funded. (300 words or less) Lukins does not receive grant funding, the cost of water meters will become the burden of the rate payer. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 10 03/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes -- -- -- Evaluation � No N/A b. Final Design Yes -- -- -- F_ F No r N/A c. Environmental Fl— Yes -- -- -- Documentation No (CEQA/NEPA) r r N/A d. Permitting Yes -- -- -- F No F N/A e. Construction Yes -- -- -- Contracting �— r No r N/A f. Construction F Yes As soon as funding is -- 5/1/18 Implementation F- R_ No available,contractor is ready to begin installing F N/A meters. Current meter installation occurs as needed. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 9 of 10 03/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed AB975 project is consistent with or supported by(e.g.General Plans, UWMPs,GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F_ Yes F_ No r N/A alternate forms of energy,recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Suppliers: 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F_ Yes F_ No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F_ Yes F_ No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No r N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F11- Yes F No F_ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:Grant funding will gain compliance with water meter laws. f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No r N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No N/A grant submittal date? 1. Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Lukins Brothers Water Company, Inc. Name of Primary Contact Jennifer Lukins Name of Secondary Contact -- Mailing Address 2031 West Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail jennifer@lukinswater.com Phone(###)###-#### 530-541-2606 Other Cooperating --- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Waterline Replacement Project 7a Project Category F- Restoration F- Storm Water/Flood Control R Waste Water/ Water Supply Project Description Phase 1 of Lukins 11 Phase Waterline Replacement Project was (Briefly describe the project, in completed in summer 2014. Phase 7a includes design and 300 words or less) engineering and construction of 5746 feet of 8" waterline. This project is in the surrounding vicinity of Phase 1, and will replace a large portion of failing infrastructure.This area has the highest recorded number of leaks in our water system. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to This project contributes to an 11 Phase System Replacement Project. a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related City of South Lake Tahoe Franchise Agreement, Lahontan MOU,TRPA MOUs, agreements or TACs MOU currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description Phase 7a is located along Tahoe Island Drive and Tahoe Vista Drive in (e.g., along the south bank of South Lake Tahoe, CA. stream/river between river Tahoe Sierra IRWM miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL New waterlines will reduce Estimated 20%of standards in accordance with the r Yes the number of water leaks in Lukins overall attainment date, and participate in F_ the system which will reduce water produced is the development of future TMDLs. TMDL loads. lost to leaking N/A waterlines (approx. 30 leaks per year). Replacing waterlines will reduce TMDL from wasted water. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Failing waterlines causes Estimated 20%of implementing measures such as r Yes water leaks which increase Lukins overall stormwater LID retrofits, erosion pollutant loads. The water produced is control/restoration to meet Water installation of new waterlines lost to leaking Quality Objectives (WQOs)for N/A will reduce pollutant loads by waterlines receiving water bodies established in drastically reducing the (approx 30 leaks the Basin Plan within the planning number of water leaks. per year). horizon. Replacing waterlines will reduce pollutant loads into storm drains. WQ3- Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 11 3/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water New waterlines will replace Estimated 20%of supplied by public water systems r Yes old failing infrastructure Lukins overall continues to meet Federal and State which will ensure that water produced is standards. drinking water provided will lost to leaking N/A continue to meet Federal and waterlines State standards. (approx 30 leaks per year). Replacing waterlines will bring Lukins to compliance with Federal and State standards WQS- Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering WN/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r-N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet This project is part of a 20 Estimated 20%of projected demands for a 20-year r Yes year waterline replacement Lukins overall planning horizon. F_ project to address projected water produced is demands for a 20-year lost to leaking N/A horizon. waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year).This project contributes to our 20 year project. Project Template Page 3 of 11 3/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or Phase 7a replaces Estimated 20%of replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes infrastructure that increases Lukins overall supply water. F reliably of water supply and water produced is increase fire protection. lost to leaking N/A waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year), and will replace old infrastructure WS3 - Implement and promote water New waterlines reduce water Estimated 20%of conservation measures and practices r Yes leaks and will help conserve Lukins overall to meet state goals. water. Customers in this water produced is project area will receive lost to leaking N/A meters that will promote waterlines conservation practices. (approx 30 leaks per year). GWM1 -Maintain and monitor r Yes New waterlines reduce water Estimated 20%of groundwater supply to assure future leaks which means less water Lukins overall reliability. F is wasted, and will preserve water produced is N/A groundwater supply. lost to leaking waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year). Replacing water lines will conserve groundwater for future. GWM2 -Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater,and advocate for improvements to impacted r N/A groundwater quality through public education. Project Template Page 4 of 11 3/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM GWM3 -Manage groundwater for New larger waterlines will Estimated 20%of multiple uses (e.g. r Yes allow for adequate flow for Lukins overall municipal/industrial/agricultural multiple uses,which is water produced is supply and environmental use). currently unavailable. lost to leaking N/A waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year). Replacing waterlines with ensure that reliable water is available to multiple uses. ER1- Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife r N/A and plant habitats. ER2- Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and colonization of potential future r N/A invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. r N/A ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. F11-N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional When waterline projects are Estimated 20%of water-related planning activities r Yes completed, local interested Lukins overall within the planning horizon as agencies are updated as to water produced is supported by current and future what has been completed lost to leaking watershed science. N/A and how we can offer waterlines support in the future. (approx 30 leaks per year). Project Template Page 5 of 11 3/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Local agencies participated in Estimated 20%of multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes the initial design of this major Lukins overall Region for information exchange. project. water produced is lost to leaking N/A waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year). IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to encourage stewardship by the public. r N/A IWM4-Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes r-N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge, flood management) in local and regional r N/A planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6-Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with regional planning. r N/A If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F N/A South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community Project Template Page 6 of 11 3/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. F N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F N/A A reduction in wasted water from emissions(e.g.green technology). leaks will reduce the demand for energy from pumps, which leads to the reduction of greenhouse gases. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A Increased fire protection and not already mentioned elsewhere. reliability in Lukins Water System. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes r No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency F Yes r No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance - Regional/local F Yes r No New larger waterlines will increase flow to commercial area. System Reoperation F Yes Fl,-' No Water Transfers r Yes W No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes r No -- Desalination F Yes Fl,-' No -- Precipitation Enhancement F Yes r No -- Recycled Municipal Water F Yes I,—,' No -- Surface Storage-- Regional/ Local F Yes Fl,-' No -- Project Template Page 7 of 11 3/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes F_ No New waterlines will improve water Distribution distribution system. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F- Yes F_ No Fewer water leaks will result in more water in the aquifer. Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes r No -- Pollution Prevention F Yes F_ No New waterlines will reduce water leaks and running water that causes pollution. Water meters will reduce excess watering. Salt and Salinity Management F_ Yes F No -- Urban Runoff Management F-' Yes F_ No Installation of new waterlines will reduce water leaks and reduce runoff into storm drains. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes r No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and I— Yes No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F_ Yes No -- Forest Management F Yes r No -- Land Use Planning and Management F Yes r No -- Recharge Areas Protection F Yes r No -- Water-dependent Recreation F Yes r No -- Watershed Management F Yes r No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes r No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 11 3/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 740000 $$- 0 740000 OR r DAC 2. Annual Operations and $7,000 0 747000 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? r Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 90000 No O&M Cost Design, Engineering and Permit Costs Phase 2 650000 650000 Phase 7a waterline replacement.Tahoe Vista/Tahoe Island Drive Phase 3 0 0 -- Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance will be funded through will be financed for the 25-year planning Lukins general fund operation and maintenance period for project implementation (not grant account. funded). f. Basis for project cost-(e.g.conceptual, Engineer and Contractor Estimate planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Ratepayers will have to pay the cost of Phase 7a if the project is not funded. (300 words or less) I a grant cannot be secured. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 11 3/5/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes -- -- -- Evaluation r No F N/A b. Final Design F Yes Project is ready to enter 1/1/2019 4/1/2019 r_ No into final engineering and design phase. F_ N/A c. Environmental I— Yes Can begin as soon as 4/1/2019 -- Documentation �— �_ No engineering is completed (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F Yes Can begin as soon as 4/1/2019 -- engineering is completed No F N/A e. Construction F Yes -- 4/1/2019 -- Contracting j— r No r N/A f. Construction F Yes -- -- -- Implementation — � R_ No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Lukins Brothers Water Company project is consistent with or supported by(e.g.General System Rehabilitation Design Plans, UWMPs,GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Report. Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F_ Yes F_ No r N/A alternate forms of energy,recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Suppliers: 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F_ Yes F_ No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F_ Yes F_ No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F_ No r N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F_ Yes F No r N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:Grant funding will gain compliance with water meter laws. f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No r N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No N/A grant submittal date? 1. Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Lukins Brothers Water Company, Inc. Name of Primary Contact Jennifer Lukins Name of Secondary Contact -- Mailing Address 2031 West Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail jennifer@lukinswater.com Phone(###)###-#### 530-541-2606 Other Cooperating --- Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Well#4 replacement and treatment project Project Category F- Restoration F- Storm Water/Flood Control R Waste Water/ Water Supply Project Description Well#4 of the Lukins Brothers Water Company, Inc., has been (Briefly describe the project, in inactive since the PCE detection above the MCL have placed the 300 words or less) drinking water supply out of compliance with state and federal requirements for drinking water standards. This project would be to abandon the existing well location, drill a new well and add a treatment unit. The location would also require a storage tank to provide continued water supply in the event of a fire or system malfunctions. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to This project contributes to a larger project, South Y Groundwater a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, Improvement Program, under the direction of the Tahoe Valley South EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so Groundwater Sustainability Agency. provide description. Political Support—List related City of South Lake Tahoe Franchise Agreement, Lahontan MOU,TRPA MOUs, agreements or TACs MOU currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description Well#4 is located at the end of Hazel Ave. on a %acre parcel owned (e.g., along the south bank of by Lukins Brothers Water Company,within the City of South Lake stream/river between river Tahoe, CA. Tahoe Sierra IRWM miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL This parcel is located within % acres parcel standards in accordance with the Yes F_ a SEZ zone. The remaining attainment date, and participate in N/A area that is not being the development of future TMDLs. utilized for the project, will be rehabilitated. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This parcel is located within a % acres parcel implementing measures such as Yes F SEZ zone. The remaining stormwater LID retrofits, erosion N/A area that is not being utilized control/restoration to meet Water for the project, will be Quality Objectives (WQOs)for rehabilitated. Retrofits will receiving water bodies established in include stormwater LID the Basin Plan within the planning retrofits, erosion control horizon. restoration WQ3- Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water This project is to treat % acres parcel supplied by public water systems Yes x groundwater supply for continues to meet Federal and State F_ drinking water and bring it to standards. the Federal and State N/A Requirements. WQS- Restore degraded streams, This project is located in a SEZ % acres parcel wetlands, riparian and upland areas Yes zone, partial recovery of SEZ to re-establish natural water filtering will be a priority of this project. processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- replace infrastructure for reliable Yes collection,treatment and disposal of N/Ax wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet This project is part of a 20 Estimated 20%of projected demands for a 20-year r Yes year waterline replacement Lukins overall planning horizon. F_ project to address projected water produced is demands for a 20-year lost to leaking N/A horizon. waterlines (approx 30 leaks per year).This project contributes to our 20 year project. Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or This project is to treat replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes groundwater supply for supply water. F drinking water and bring it to the Federal and State N/A Requirements. WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. F- N/A GWM1 -Maintain and monitor r Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. F N/A GWM2 -Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality x Yes groundwater,and advocate for improvements to impacted N/A groundwater quality through public education. Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM GWM3 -Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural supply and environmental use). F N/A ER1- Enhance and restore water -- -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife r and plant habitats. N/A ER2- Develop and implement -- -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and colonization of potential future r invasive species. N/A ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. r ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts -- -- F Yes caused by existing and new development. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional When water projects are Estimated 20%of water-related planning activities r Yes completed, local interested Lukins overall within the planning horizon as agencies are updated as to water produced is supported by current and future what has been completed lost to leaking watershed science. N/A and how we can offer waterlines support in the future. (approx 30 leaks per year). Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Local agencies participated in This project multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes the initial design of this major provides Region for information exchange. project. reduction in current PCE N/A contamination affection all water providers IWM3 - Increase public education and -- -- awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to encourage stewardship by the public. r IWM4-Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes r- IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. -- -- water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge, flood management) in local and regional r planning efforts and support efforts N/A to continue improving the science. IWM6-Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in x Yes order to improve coordination with regional planning. N/A If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community W N/A -- considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F N/A South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community as well as the Lukins service area Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of N/A -- climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F- N/A Increased fire protection and not already mentioned elsewhere. reliability in Lukins Water System. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes r No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency xF Yes No -- Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance - Regional/local F Yes r No System Reoperation F Yes Fl,-' No Water Transfers r Yes W No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater xF- Yes No -- Desalination F- Yes r No -- Precipitation Enhancement F Yes r No -- Recycled Municipal Water F Yes I,—,' No -- Surface Storage-- Regional/ Local F Yes Fl,-' No -- Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes F_ No New waterlines will improve water Distribution distribution system. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F- Yes F_ No Fewer water leaks will result in more water in the aquifer. Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes r No -- Pollution Prevention F Yes F_ No Salt and Salinity Management F_ Yes F No -- Urban Runoff Management Yes xF_ No Installation of new waterlines will reduce water leaks and reduce runoff into storm drains. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes r No -- Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and I— Yes No -- Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F_ Yes No -- Forest Management F Yes r No -- Land Use Planning and Management F Yes r No -- Recharge Areas Protection F Yes r No -- Water-dependent Recreation F Yes r No -- Watershed Management F Yes r No -- Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes r No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2016 Dollars) 5,500,000 $$- 0 5,500,000 OR r DAC 2. Annual Operations and $7,000 0 707000 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? r Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 500,000 No O&M Cost Design, Engineering and Permit Costs Phase 2 2,500,000 0 Build new well site and appropriate well buildings, abandon well Phase 3 2,500,000 0 Purchase and install treatment unit and tank Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance will be funded through will be financed for the 25-year planning Lukins general fund operation and maintenance period for project implementation (not grant account. funded). f. Basis for project cost-(e.g.conceptual, Engineer and Contractor Estimate planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Ratepayers will have to pay the cost if a grant the project is not funded. (300 words or less) I cannot be secured. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes This project has completed -- -- Evaluation — an assessment and r No evaluation on the problem F N/A and an alternatives analysis of the solution b. Final Design F Yes Project is ready to enter --r No -- into final engineering and design phase. F_ N/A c. Environmental I— Yes Can begin as soon as -- -- Documentation �— �_ No engineering is completed (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F Yes Can begin as soon as engineering is completed No F N/A e. Construction F Yes -- Contracting j— r No r N/A f. Construction F Yes -- Implementation — � R_ No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is -- checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Lukins Brothers Water Company project is consistent with or supported by(e.g.General System Rehabilitation Design Plans, UWMPs,GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Report. Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the -- feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much -- research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F_ Yes F_ No r N/A alternate forms of energy,recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe -- e. If you are an Urban Water Suppliers: 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F_ Yes F_ No N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F_ Yes F_ No N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F_ No r N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F_ Yes F No r N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: s. f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F_ No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the x Yes F No N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No N/A grant submittal date? 1. Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Markleeville Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Steve Martin Name of Secondary Contact Joanne Oehlerking Mailing Address 1200 Hot Springs Road, Markleeville, CA 96120 E-mail mj 111 @frontier.com Phone(###)###-#### 530-694-22924 Other Cooperating Alpine Watershed Group, Alpine County Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion?If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title MPUD Sewer Line Relocation Project Category Water Supply/Wastewater FV_ Restoration F%07 Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The project will 1) restore the natural stream channel and (Briefly describe the project,in 300 floodplain to improve geomorphic function and reconnect words or less) the stream to its historic floodplain, and 2) relocate and replace aging sewer infrastructure in the floodplain to reduce the threat of water quality impairments from flooding and sewer leaks, 3) construct a storm water capture and infiltration system for highway runoff, and 4) a provide public access and recreations features including walking trails and interpretive signage. Total number of projects 1 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes. It's in Phase 3 of 3. It is also a restoration priority of Project (e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Carson River Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan (2007) If so provide description. and Carson River Watershed Floodplain Management Plan (2008). It also achieves the Markleeville PUD's sewer facility safety assessment and remediation plans. The project is also a component of the Alpine County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Political Support—List related MOUs, MOU with Alpine Watershed Group and Markleeville Public agreements or TACs currently in place. Utility District; MOU with U.S. Forest and Bureau of Land Management regarding land transfer and restoration; Tahoe Sierra IRWM Technical Advisory Committee involved in design review and project planning Project Location: Latitude: N 38.694861 Longitude: W 119.777972 Project Location Description (e.g.,along the south bank of stream/river Along the northwest bank of Markleeville Creek,just between river miles or miles from downstream (east)of Highway 89 bridge Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) WQ1 -Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with F_ Yes the attainment date, and r N/A participate in the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Project will reduce the threat of implementing measures such F7 Yes water quality impairments from as stormwater LID retrofits, F_ N/A flooding and sewer leaks; project erosion control/restoration to will install storm water treatment meet Water Quality Objectives system for Highway 89 runoff; (WQOs)for receiving water restored floodplain will spread and bodies established in the Basin slow water flows effectively Plan within the planning horizon. reducing erosion and allow trapping of sediments/nutrients during overbank events WQ3-Implement water quality Project involves stream monitoring monitoring programs through F7 Yes component since 2006, involving planning horizon, and F_ N/A stream bioassessment(benthic coordinate annually throughout macroinvertebrates and riparian the Region. habitat) and chemical monitoring for pre and post-project comparison Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) WQ4-Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water r Yes systems continues to meet W_ N/A Federal and State standards. WQ5-Restore degraded Project site lacks stream bank, 1 acre of streams,wetlands, riparian and r Yes riparian and upland vegetation due floodplain upland areas to re-establish F_ N/A to past development and reconstructed natural water filtering processes. alteration; Restored floodplain will and riparian reestablish natural water filtering vegetation processes, provide ecological restored benefits of overbanking and establish biogeochemical cycling WQ6-Operate and maintain, Project will replace aging sewer 700 linear feet of build,or replace infrastructure r Yes infrastructure,eliminate all new sewer line for reliable collection,treatment r- N/A manholes in the floodplain and through the and disposal of wastewater. reduce the threat of water quality floodplain; 4 new impairments from flooding and manholes located sewer leaks outside the floodplain WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a r Yes 20-year planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build,or replace infrastructure r Yes to reliably supply water. r N/A WS3-Implement and promote water conservation measures r Yes and practices to meet state r N/A goals. GWM1-Maintain and monitor r- Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) GWM2-Promote groundwater protection activities for high r Yes quality groundwater, and P'_ N/A advocate for improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3-Manage groundwater for multiple uses(e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1-Enhance and restore water Project will enhance degraded 400 linear feet of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas r Yes streams to support healthy native streambank and associated uplands to r N/A fish population; reestablishing stabilized; 1 acre support healthy watersheds, riparian environment will provide of floodplain viable native fish,wildlife and important wildlife habitat and restored plant habitats. travel corridors; project will recover lost habitat due to site development ER2-Develop and implement Project involves site monitoring 5 acres programs to prevent the spread r Yes and stewardship to prevent any monitored for of existing invasive species and r N/A future infestation weed-free status colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3-Implement, in coordination with public and private F Yes landowners, activities to manage P'_ N/A forest health and wildfire risks. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) ER4-Minimize ecosystem FV Yes Sewer system improvements will 700 linear feet of impacts caused by existing and reduce potential for leaks; phase 1 new sewer line new development. F N/A of the project involved relocating through the the USFS facility and removing floodplain; 4 new existing structures from the site; manholes located phase 3 will remove floodwall outside the which channelizes stream and floodplain; 250 increases water velocity and bank linear feet of erosion; project will revegetate floodwall erodible soils removed;2 acres of land revegetated IWM1-Conduct local and Project applies proven stream and 2007 Markleeville regional water-related planning r Yes floodplain restoration practices; Creek Restoration activities within the planning F N/A Technical Advisory Committee Design Report horizon as supported by current guiding all aspects of project design and 2013 Design and future watershed science. and implementation Plan provide scientific basis IWM2- Ensure collaboration Collaboration is an integral part of 8 natural among multiple jurisdictions r Yes the project given the multi resource agencies within the Region for F N/A components of the project— and community information exchange. stream restoration,sewer,and groups public recreation/education;the represented on Technical Advisory Committee Technical provides diverse professional input; Advisory public outreach efforts offer Committee valuable community representation Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the Brief explanation of project Quantification project linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of address the streams/wetlands objective? restored or enhanced) IWM3- Increase public Public education component of 10 watershed education and awareness of r Yes project will engage community and stewards watershed functions, protection F N/A visitors in learning about monitoring site; and restoration needs to watershed resources and hands-on 30 volunteers encourage stewardship by the activities to assist with restoration assisting with public. and natural resource protection; maintenance; volunteers will also be involved in increased natural long-term project stewardship resource through annual restoration projects awareness of 100 and ongoing site monitoring community members and visitor IWM4-Promote activities that Existing flood wall has exacerbated 250 linear feet of reduce flood risk. r Yes flooding condition at the site and floodwall r accelerated bank failure removed; 1 acre downstream; reconstructed of floodplain N/A floodplain will permit for reconstructed overbanking and alleviate current flood hazards; project will reduce risk of sewer system inundation due to flooding and reduce risk of sewer pipe failure; reduce flood risk IWM5-Address climate change Restored floodplain will allow 1 acre of (e.g.water quality,water supply, FV_ Yes stream corridor to accommodate floodplain groundwater recharge,flood F N/A variable flood flows;floodplain will reconstructed management) in local and offer some water storage and and riparian regional planning efforts and attenuate stream flow; improved vegetation support efforts to continue stream bank and riparian area restored improving the science. vegetation will provide a carbon bank IWM6-Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities r Yes in order to improve coordination F%0_ N/A with regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community F_ N/A Project is being planned in partnership with considerations. Washoe Tribe; representative from Washoe Environmental Protection Department serves on Technical Advisory Committee; working to integrate native American historical and cultural interpretive signs b. Disadvantaged Community Fv- N/A considerations'. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. Fv- N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects F_ N/A Project will help mitigate potential long- of climate change'. term impacts of climate change as described in IWMS e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse P7 N/A gas emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that r N/A are not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F_ Yes FV_ No Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes FV_ No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance-Regional/ local r Yes Fv_ No System Reoperation r Yes r No Water Transfers r Yes r No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater i— Yes FV_ No Desalination r Yes FV_ No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water r Yes FV_ No Surface Storage-- Regional/Local r Yes FV_ No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes FV_ No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes FV_ No Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes FV_ No Pollution Prevention FV Yes r No Reduced erosion due to stream channelization and decaying floodwall; reduce potential for sewage leaks/spills Salt and Salinity Management r Yes r No Urban Runoff Management r Yes r No Storm water treatment system for highway runoff will be installed Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes FV_ No Economic Incentives(Loans, Grants, and r Yes FV_ No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes r No Provides multiple environmental benefits(chemical, biological, geomorphic and hydrologic) Forest Management r Yes FV_ No Land Use Planning and Management PO Yes r No Project has been integrated into downtown Markleeville bike and pedestrian plans; helps meet ordinances of the County Code; meets long-standing commitment with U.S. Forest Service to reclaim and remediate property Recharge Areas Protection r Yes FV_ No Water-dependent Recreation FV_ Yes r No Will offer stream access, riparian walking trails and natural resource Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? interpretive signage Watershed Management F%0 Yes F_ No High priority restoration project; addressed in multiple watershed management plans Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F%O- Yes F_ No Alleviates and mitigates flood impacts Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing -Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share:Non-State Cost Share: Total Cost Grant Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Funding Fund Source Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $1,750,000 $50,000 $1,800,000 OR F_ DAC 2. Annual Operations and $5-10,000 annually for Maintenance(O&M) general maintenance b.Can the Project be phased? V Yes F_ No 1. If so provide cost Project O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Cost Phase 1 $600,000 Sewer system modifications Phase 2 $1,400,000 Site restoration and sewer activation Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s)of funding for Project District Attorney Trust $27,000 cost Fund d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured Alpine Watershed $23,000 funding and certainty of the sources for Group and County staff Project cost. time e.Explain how operation and maintenance Covered by additional grant funding and partner match costs will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Technical Specifications for Sewer and Restoration planning,bid,etc.) Design Plans g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been FV_ Yes F_ No completed? h.Please describe what impact there may be If this project were not to proceed,the existing if the project is not funded. (300 words or condition of the project site would continue to less) jeopardize water quality and the integrity of the stream channel. The floodwall and stream banks will continue to degrade and jeopardize the stability of the sewer lines through that area. Also the sewer manholes will remain in the floodplain and will risk flooding and sewer leaks. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement,Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Planned/Act Planned/ Current Activities in Each ual Start Actual Project Project Stage Date Completion Stage (mm/yr) Date(mm/yr) a. Assessment and XYes Preliminary planning, December Evaluation F r No community outreach 2013 F Yes F and project assessment b. Final Design XYes Sewer and Restoration December F F No Design Plans complete 2014 r c. Environmental XYes Project Description, December Documentation F r No Initial Study and 2014 (CEQA/NEPA) Mitigated Negative r Declaration complete d. Permitting r Yes Necessary permitting January August 2017 X XNo packages being 2017 developed F N/A e. Construction F Yes January May 2018 Contracting F XNo 2018 r N/A f. Construction F Yes June 2018 December Implementation F XNo 2019 F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the Upper Carson River Watershed Stream Corridor proposed project is consistent with or Condition Assessment(2004), Carson River supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan (2007), GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Carson River Watershed Floodplain Management Conservation Plans,TMDLs,Basin Plans,etc.) Plan (2008) b. List technical reports and studies supporting 2007 Markleeville Creek Restoration Design the feasibility of this project Report and 2013 Design Plan provide hydro- geomorphic analysis and modeling c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. Environmental consultants have conducted how much research has been conducted) of hydraulic and geomorphic assessment,collected the proposed project in 300 words or less. supplemental observations of site geomorphology, hydraulics and vegetation, validated flood model for existing conditions and done engineering review of sewer system modifications. As mentioned above,the project has been identified as a restoration priority in multiple watershed assessments. d. Does the project implement green r Yes No XN/A technology(e.g. alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques,etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water r Yes F No F N/A Management Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter r Yes r No r N/A requirements(CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions r Yes r No r N/A above is"no", do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an F- Yes i No r N/A AWMP(due 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an r Yes r No r N/A AWMP prior to receiving project Provide Explanation if necessary: funding? Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and F Yes F No F N/A submitted for the subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within F Yes F No F N/A 1 year of the grant submittal date? 1. Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Markleeville Water Company Name of Primary Contact Steve Martin Name of Secondary Contact Joanne Oehlerking Mailing Address 1200 Hot Springs Road, Markleeville, CA 96120 E-mail rnj111@frontier.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-694-2372 and 530-694-2924 Other Cooperating Alpine County Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Markleville Pipeline Replacement, Meter and Hydrant Installation Project Category F_ Water Supply/Wastewater Project Description (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Project includes replacement of approximately 21,050 words or less) linear feet of water main with new 8-inch water main and associated water services, water meters,fire hydrants, water main connections, site restoration including landscaping and paving replacement, and appurtenances. The project has two benefits: replacing aging, leaking water infrastructure to preserve water supplies and increasing the fire protection capabilities at the site. Total number of projects 1 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Yes, MWC has identified over 15,000 linear feet of If so provide description. waterlines in their service area that need to be upgraded to meet the State fire prevention mandates, as well as replace aging, leaking waterlines for water conservation requirements. Political Support—List related MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Various Tahoe Sierra IRWM Longitude: Various Project Location Description (e.g.,along the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the F Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as F Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering I� N/A processes. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. F%0_ N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or The waterline replacement replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes project will upgrade supply water. r N/A existing water system components with more efficient and reliable infrastructure. WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality Yes groundwater, and advocate for N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies, wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy W N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of Objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Markleeville, Ca 21,050 feet of public and private landowners, Fv Yes considered a high risk, replacement activities to manage forest health and wildland-urban interface water supply N/A fire area; for this reason, pipe increased wildfire risks. this waterline replacement to 8 inch for fire project and upgrades will suppression allow sufficient water efforts; 40 fire pressure and supply to hydrants protect homes and installed to businesses during fire events. provide for the In addition, much of the residential community is without fire homes in the hydrants and each waterline project area. upgrade installs a fire hydrant on every 500 feet of waterline installed. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes caused by existing and new development. N/A IWM1 - Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Markleeville Water multiple jurisdictions within the Fv Yes Company works with Region for information exchange. N/A STPUD and Alpine County for information exchange and project uidance. IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, r Yes protection and restoration needs to N/A encourage stewardship by the public. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes R N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Every water conservation Leaking water water quality,water supply, F40 Yes effort is a direct benefit to supply groundwater recharge,flood future climate change distribution r N/A effects, which call for pipes are management) in local and regional increased water storage estimated to planning efforts and support efforts and water supply. This contribute to to continue improving the science. project is the replacement 10% water of leaking water supply production loss. distribution pipes that will result in water savings IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A Yes, Markleeville is a designated disadvantaged community and the project is located in this community. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. r N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Water source storage and climate change'. availability will be affected by climate change, this program helps to increase available water supply for that eventuality e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Water conservation efforts result in emissions (e.g.green technology). less drinking water treatment and distribution. Water and wastewater treatment are identified as among the highest of energy users in the country. Less water production and distribution results in less energy utilized, leading to a reduction in ghg. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes No Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes No The replacement of leaking water distribution pipes is identified as a Best Management Practice by the CUWCC. This project will implement this BMP and result in significant water savings. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local Yes V No This project is the improvement of local drinking water supply conveyance infrastructure. System Reoperation Yes F No Water Transfers F Yes IO No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F- Yes 170 No Desalination F- Yes l7 No Precipitation Enhancement No Recycled Municipal Water F Yes F No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes r No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and V Yes F- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F- Yes P-1 No Matching Water Quality to Use F- Yes Fv- No Pollution Prevention F- Yes Fv- No Salt and Salinity Management F- Yes P-1 No Urban Runoff Management F- Yes FV- No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship Yes V No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F- Yes 40 No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F- Yes FV- No Forest Management F Yes W No This project will result in improved fire fighting capacity, helping to protect the national forest within the Markleeville service area. Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Land Use Planning and Management F Yes F No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes F No Water-dependent Recreation F Yes F No Watershed Management F Yes W No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes F No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage-CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 5,678,237 0 5,678,237 OR Yes to DAC DAC 2. Annual Operations and 37,500 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 2,000,000 Design, construction of waterline installation. Phase 2 1,839,118 Construction, phase 2 Phase 3 1,839,118 Construction, phase 3 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M Costs are included in the Markleeville will be financed for the 25-year planning Water Company general revenue budget period for project implementation (not grant annually. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Planning documents; historical information planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F7 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if This project provides water savings as well the project is not funded. (300 words or less) as fire protection benefits. Both of these benefits would be lost without funding for project implementation, leaving vulnerable commercial and residential areas without adequate fire protection. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and XF Yes Evaluation F No F N/A b. Final Design F Yes These waterlines still 2/2019 4/19 X need to be designed. xF F No F N/A c. Environmental XF Yes 2/19 4/19 Documentation (CEQA/NEPA) No F N/A d. Permitting F Yes Permitting will be 02/19 4/19 identified and obtained X X� NO during the construction F N/A contracting phase. e. Construction F Yes Project will need to be 05/19 10/20 Contracting bid and contracts X XF No executed. F N/A f. Construction F Yes Installation of the 05/19 10/20 Implementation linear feet of upgraded X X� No water lines, including F N/A installation of 7 fire hydrants. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Compliance with the National Fire project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Protection Association and the Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat California Fire Code standards; Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) California Urban Water Conservation Council's Best Management Implementation guidelines. b. List technical reports and studies supporting the feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much California State Fire Code has research has been conducted) of the proposed project in information on the size of water 300 words or less. supply lines necessary to provide the adequate fire flow for fire suppression; the California Urban Water Conservation Council has information on the water savings through repair of leaking water infrastructure. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F- Yes F- No X F- N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F- Yes F- No F- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? x 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F- Yes F- No F- N/A x 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F- Yes I— No x F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F- Yes F- No xF N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No XF- N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior (— Yes F No X F- N/A Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No subject basin? x N/A 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No X F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Shelly Thomsen Name of Secondary Contact Lynn Nolan Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Dr., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail sthomsen@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone(###)###-#### 530-543-6268 Other Cooperating North Tahoe Public Utility District,Tahoe City Public Utility Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders District,Squaw Valley Public Service District, Lukins Brothers Water Company,Tahoe Keys Water, Lakeside, Inc., and any other agencies within the TSIRWMP region that would like to participate in the program.Will also partner with Tahoe Resource Conservation District on their landscape conservation program. Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Regional Water Conservation Programs Project Category F Restoration F- Storm Water/Flood Control Waste Water/ Water Supply Project Description Regional water conservation program that includes implementing (Briefly describe the project, in water conservation measures such as turf removal;water saving 300 words or less) appliance installation (commercial and residential); interior and exterior water audits for efficiency measures; irrigation improvements, smart meter installation and providing outreach and educational materials. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to Yes, this project contributes to the AB1420 and the SBX7-7 (20 a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, percent water reduction by 2020) as mandated by the State of EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so California. provide description. Political Support—List related MOU with California Urban MOUs,agreements or TACs Water Conservation Council currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Location Description The water conservation implementation measures are located in the (e.g.,along the south bank of water service areas of the TSIRWM region, which encompasses stream/river between river portions of Alpine County, El Dorado County, Placer County, and miles or miles from Sierra County. Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 -Meet approved TMDL The Lake Tahoe TMDL standards in accordance with the Yes addresses urban runoff from attainment date, and participate in F irrigation and the use of the development of future TMDLs. fertilizers on urban N/A landscaping. This project will reduce both of these pollutants by reducing the amount of irrigation water and fertilizers used on private and commercial landscape sites. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by This project promotes the 126,000 square implementing measures such as r Yes removal of turf as foot of turf stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F_ landscaping and promotes removal is control/restoration to meet Water native landscaping that not projected Quality Objectives(WQOs)for N/A only utilizes less irrigation depending upon receiving water bodies established in water but does not need funding. This the Basin Plan within the planning fertilizer use, minimizing the results in a horizon. pollutant loads to Lake savings of.15 Tahoe. gallons per sq ft of turf removed per day times 150 days per year (based on the local are irrigation season) is equal to 22 Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) gallons per sq. ft. per year or a total water savings of 2,772,000 gallons saved annually. WQ3 - Implement water quality -- -- monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate FV annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water -- -- supplied by public water systems F_ Yes continues to meet Federal and State F- standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, -- -- wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering FV processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection,treatment and disposal of wastewater. WS1 -Provide water supply to meet This project reduces the Estimated 4.8 MG projected demands for a 20-year F Yes demand on water supply, annually will be planning horizon. F_ thereby protecting the water saved with this resources for future use. project by N/A implementing all proposed Best management practices for water conservation. WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or -- -- replace infrastructure to reliably Yes supply water. r Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM WS3 - Implement and promote water This project implements the With the turf conservation measures and practices F-'- Yes California Urban Water buyback BMP to meet state goals. F Conservation Council's implementation (CUWCC) Best Management alone, estimated N/A Practices designed to meet water savings are state water savings goals 2.7 MG of water saved annually. Additional water conservation B M P's implemented would increase this annual savings by 2,055,812 MG. GWM1 -Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. FV- GWM2 -Promote groundwater -- -- protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for r improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public N/A education. GWM3 -Manage groundwater for The majority of the municipal -- multiple uses (e.g. r Yes water supply source in Lake municipal/industrial/agricultural F Tahoe is groundwater; supply and environmental use). conservation manages this N/A source for multiple uses ER1 -Enhance and restore water The turf removal -- bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes implementation for this associated uplands to support healthy F project contributes to the watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife enhancement and and plant habitats. N/A restoration of Lake Tahoe and its tributaries by keeping urban runoff and fertilizer from entering the watersheds ER2 -Develop and implement -- programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM colonization of potential future F N/A invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with -- -- public and private landowners, F_ Yes activities to manage forest health and wildfire risks. r ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts r- Yes The implementation of 126,000 square caused by existing and new landscaping best feet of turf is development. F management practices in the proposed to be N/A Water Conservation program removed helps to minimize impacts of annually new and existing provided developments by funding is encouraging waterwise available. landscaping resulting in a reduction in irrigation runoff and fertilizer use. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional -- -- water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as FV supported by current and future watershed science. N/A IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This program is a regional -- multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes program and utilizes Region for information exchange. F collaboration and information among N/A implementing water agencies IWM3 - Increase public education and This program contains an -- awareness of watershed functions, r Yes educational/outreach protection and restoration needs to F component designed to encourage stewardship by the public. make the public aware of N/A urban landscaping and its effect on the watershed. IWM4- Promote activities that -- -- reduce flood risk. F Yes F11- Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water conservation With all proposed water quality,water supply, Yes contributes to maintaining an water groundwater recharge,flood F adequate supply of stored conservation management) in local and regional water resources to meet BMP's planning efforts and support efforts N/A anticipated impacts of implemented, to continue improving the science. climate change on water 19,069 kWh of sources. In addition,water electricity saved conservation results in a per year; 13.5 reduction of greenhouse Metric Tons of gases and a reduction in Carbon Dioxide energy usage by reducing the reduced annually need to treat and transport drinking water. IWM6- Monitor water storage, -- -- release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with regional planning. r If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community N/A STPUD partners with the Washoe Tribe considerations. to provide water conservation materials and educational outreach. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F N/A South Lake Tahoe, Kings Beach and Sierra County are all designated disadvantaged communities c. Environmental Justice Z considerations. N/A -- d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F N/A Water source storage and availability climate change3. will be affected by climate change, this program helps to increase available water supply for that eventuality Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F N/A Water production and distribution are emissions(e.g.green technology). one of the highest consumers of energy.With water conservation efforts, less water production leads to Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM a reduction in energy usage, which leads to a reduction in ghg. For this project alone,there is an estimated 19,069 kWh of annual electricity saved and a resulting 13.5 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide saved annually. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r- N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/CWPU2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes Fl,-' No -- Urban Water Use Efficiency Yes r No Water conservation programs help to increase urban water use efficiency Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F Yes F No -- System Reoperation F Yes r No -- Water Transfers F Yes r No -- Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F Yes Fv- No -- Desalination r Yes Fv- No -- Precipitation Enhancement r Yes Fv- No -- Recycled Municipal Water r Yes Fv- No -- Surface Storage--Regional/Local F Yes F No -- Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F No -- Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes FO- No -- Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Matching Water Quality to Use F_ Yes W No -- Pollution Prevention r Yes r No Landscaping replacement with native plants as proposed in this program help to minimize irrigation runoff and fertilizer usage Salt and Salinity Management F Yes F No -- Urban Runoff Management F Yes r No Landscaping replacement with native plants helps to control urban runoff Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes F-1 No -- Economic Incentives(Loans, Grants,and Yes F No The program provides economic Water Pricing) incentives to participants Ecosystem Restoration F_ Yes r No -- Forest Management F_ Yes r No -- Land Use Planning and Management Yes F_ No -- Recharge Areas Protection F Yes No -- Water-dependent Recreation R- Yes F No -- Watershed Management r Yes F No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes r No -- Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 800,000 200,000 0 800,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $- 0 0 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? R- Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 300,000 0 Water conservation BMP implementation, education, outreach Phase 2 300,000 0 Water conservation BMP implementation, education, outreach Phase 3 200,000 0 Water conservation BMP implementation, education, outreach Phase 4 0 0 -- Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Water Utility $200,000 cost General Funds d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding -- $- and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and maintenance costs will be provided will be financed for the 25-year planning by the landowner/homeowner period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Historical usage planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Fl-�- Yes F No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Water conservation/water use efficiency has been the project is not funded. (300 words or less) identified as an important aspect in dealing with future water supply and source needs. Without a program to implement water efficiency use by all, water sources will be impacted negatively. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and R- Yes -- -- -- Evaluation F No F N/A b. Final Design r Yes -- -- '- F r No r N/A c. Environmental F Yes -- -- -- Documentation F_ r No (CEQA/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting W Yes -- -- -- F r No r N/A e. Construction F Yes -- -- -- Contracting F No r N/A f. Construction F Yes Program implementation 6/1/2019 6/1/2022 Implementation R_ No including outreach, application materials, r N/A best management practices and rebates and incentives to landowners Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed California Urban Water Conservation project is consistent with or supported by(e.g.General Council Best Management Practices Plans, UWMPs,GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Implementation Memorandum of Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) Understanding; California Department of Water Resources Urban Water Management Plan; Lake Tahoe TMDL and Lahontan Basin Management Plan b. List technical reports and studies supporting the US EPA Water Conservation feasibility of this project guidelines;The Handbook of Water Use and Conservation: Homes, Landscapes, Business, Industry, Farms;Amy Vickers May 2013 c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much A variety of research exists regarding research has been conducted) of the proposed project in Best Management Practices for 300 words or less. water conservation, but the most concise are included on the CUWCC's website: www.cuwcc.org where a breakdown for each BMP shows evaluations for calculating water savings. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. xF Yes F No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques,etc.) 1.If so please describe Ghg reductions from reductions in power useage for water production e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management r Yes F- No F- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? r Yes F- No F- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Yes F- No F- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F- Yes F- No r N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary:-- f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No r N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No r N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary:-- g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the R- Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No r N/A grant submittal date? 1. Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/16/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Raina Blasser Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating United States Forest Service (partial landowner) Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Keller-Heavenly Zone Improvements Project Category r Water Supply/Wastewater Project Description Keller-Heavenly Zone Improvements addresses the water (Briefly describe the project, in 300 zone existing tank structural deficiencies and the high risk words or less) danger of catastrophic failure due to rock hazards located above the tanks. A single, old, high pressure main is the only source to the Keller Zone. This project would increase public safety, fire flow, system reliability and redundancy by evaluating and implementing the best alternative of a design of a new tank and/or booster station. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Longitude: Project Location Description (e.g., along This project is located adjacent to Keller Road and near the south bank of stream/river Heavenly Mountain Resort in South Lake Tahoe, CA between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Not applicable standards in accordance with the attainment date, and participate in the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Not applicable implementing measures such as stormwater LID retrofits, erosion control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality F N/A monitoring programs through planning horizon, and coordinate annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water This project involves the supplied by public water systems F Yes upgrades to a water delivery continues to meet Federal and State r N/A system to continue to meet standards. Federal and State Standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, Not applicable wetlands, riparian and upland areas to re-establish natural water filtering processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of I� N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 2 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1- Provide water supply to meet Yes This project upgrades a water projected demands for a 20-year delivery storage system to planning horizon. ensure water demands can be adequately met WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or Yes This project upgrades a water replace infrastructure to reliably delivery storage system to supply water. ensure water demands can be adequately met WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural F N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water xF— N/A bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and associated uplands to support healthy watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and R N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. Project Template Page 3 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Yes As part of the alternatives public and private landowners, analysis for this project,fire activities to manage forest health and flow to provide protection for wildfire risks. public and private landowners is being assessed and addressed. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Not applicable caused by existing and new development. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Not applicable multiple jurisdictions within the Region for information exchange. IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to r N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that Not applicable reduce flood risk. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Not applicable water quality,water supply, groundwater recharge,flood management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 4 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 5 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community x considerations. F- N/A b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. Yes Yes,this project is located in a designated DAC c. Environmental Justice'considerations. X N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of x climate change'. F- N/A e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). x f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. x 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No Urban Water Use Efficiency Fy-' Yes F- No Urban water storage and delivery system upgrades and continued reliability Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local Yes Urban water storage and delivery system upgrades and continued reliability System Reoperation F- Yes Fv- No Project Template Page 6 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F_ Yes FV_ No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F_ Yes FV_ No Desalination F Yes P-0 No Precipitation Enhancement No Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes Fv- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes P-0 No Matching Water Quality to Use F_ Yes Fv- No Pollution Prevention F_ Yes Fv- No Salt and Salinity Management F Yes P-0 No Urban Runoff Management F_ Yes Fv- No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes P07 No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes F%0_ No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F_ Yes F%_0 No Forest Management F_ Yes N-0 No Land Use Planning and Management F_ Yes F%_0 No Recharge Areas Protection F_ Yes F%_0 No Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes N-0 No Watershed Management F_ Yes F%_0 No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes P-0 No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 2,538,000 $846,000 0 3,384,000 OR 17- DAC x 2. Annual Operations and 37,500 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? r Yes P/- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project STPUD Capital $846,000 cost Improvement Funding d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs STPUD General Funds will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Planning documents; historical information planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes x h.Please describe what impact there may be if the project is not funded. (300 words or less) 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 8 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and XF Yes Evaluation F No F N/A b. Final Design F No An assessment and 7/1/2016 3/2017 x evaluation is being x� F N/A completed and final design is in process. c. Environmental F No 7/1/2016 3/2017 Documentation x (CECjA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F Yes 1/2017 3/2017 F XF No F N/A e. Construction F Yes 4/2017 10/2018 Contracting XF No F N/A f. Construction F Yes 5/2017 10/2018 Implementation XF No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 9 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed STPUD Capital Improvement Plan project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Provide explanation if more than feasibility of this project one project stage is checked as current status c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Not applicable: water insfrastructure research has been conducted) of the proposed project in upgrades 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes F No X F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management XF Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? XF Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements XF Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No X F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No XF N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No X F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the XF Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes No X N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 10 of 10 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Raina Blasser Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive South Lake Tahoe CA 96150 Email Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone(###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating Agencies,organizations,and stakeholders throughout the Basin Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders will benefit from improved communications Is your agency/organization Yes. committed to the project through completion?If not,please explain II. General Project Information Project Title SCADA Upgrades Project Category X Water Supply/Wastewater Project Description To improve the reliability of SCADA at tank sites,the SCADA (Briefly describe the project,in 300 Steering and Executive Committees of the District suggests words or less) that Uninterruptable Power Supply(UPS)be added to any tank site that currently has none for the level instruments or upgraded at sites where power supply is beyond its useful life and unreliable.The reliability of the UPS at high risk sites may also be improved by adding solar panels to charge the battery during extended utility power outages. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger No. Project(e.g.,TMDL,EIP,Phase 2 of 3)? If so provide description. Political Support—List related MOUs, Not applicable. agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: 38.922139 Longitude: -119.969428 Project Location Description(e.g.,along There are 15 water tank location sites within the District's the south bank of stream/river service area which is approximately 15 square miles and is between river miles or miles from located on the South shore of Lake Tahoe. Towns/intersection and/or address): Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project,provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified.If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives,provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region(see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 -Meet approved TMDL Relevant construction will be standards in accordance with the Wo Yes carried out in accordance attainment date,and participate in r N/A with TMDL guidelines. the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater LID retrofits,erosion R N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3-Implement water quality monitoring programs through ❑Yes planning horizon,and coordinate p N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4-Ensure that drinking water This project is critical to the supplied by public water systems r Yes District's continuous delivery continues to meet Federal and State r N/A of drinking water and water standards. for firefighting response within the District's service area. WQ5-Restore degraded streams, wetlands,riparian and upland areas ❑Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain,build,or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 2 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1-Provide water supply to meet This project works towards projected demands for a 20-year Wo Yes upgrading the District's planning horizon. r N/A SCADA system in accordance with the standards set by the Steering and Executive Committees.These projects also ensure the District's compliance with California Title 22 requirements,which impacts fire flow conditions. WS2-Operate and maintain,build,or The upgrade or installation of replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes backup power supply at the supply water. p N/A District's water tank sites will ensure the continuous availability of adequate water supply,even during times of power loss by the local utility company. WS3-Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. p N/A GWM1-Maintain and monitor r Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2-Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater,and advocate for R N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3-Manage groundwater for Constant power supply to the multiple uses(e.g. F Yes water tank sites will prevent municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A the overdraft of water from supply and environmental use). wells and the subsequent overflowing of water tanks that would result. Project Template Page 3 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1-Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands,riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. ER2-Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3-Implement,in coordination with public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and Fv N/A wildfire risks. ER4-Minimize ecosystem impacts r Yes Small scale construction caused by existing and new related to this project will be development. r N/A conducted in accordance with all TRPA regulations. IWM1-Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2-Ensure collaboration among Continuous power supply to multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes the District's SCADA system Region for information exchange. F N/A will allow uninterrupted system-wide information to be collected,stored,and shared as appropriate. IWM3-Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to F N/A encourage stewardship by the public. Project Template Page 4 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4-Promote activities that Installation of backup power reduce flood risk. I✓Yes supply will prevent localized ❑ N/A flooding which could result from loss of power at any of the water tank sites. IWM5-Address climate change(e.g. The District's tank sites are water quality,water supply, Wo Yes generally located in remote, groundwater recharge,flood r N/A high elevation,forested management)in local and regional locations vulnerable to planning efforts and support efforts power outage,particularly to continue improving the science. during winter storms and wildfire.Data suggests that climate change will only increase the number and intensity of these types of incidents. IWM6-Monitor water storage, The primary focus of this release and exchange activities in 0 Yes project is to maintain order to improve coordination with r N/A constant SCADA operation;a regional planning. function of which includes the ongoing monitoring and adjustment of water levels within each of the District's water storage tanks. If no objectives are addressed;describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable;do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community rv- N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r- N/A South Lake Tahoe has been designated a disadvantaged community by CaIEPA. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. rv- N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of N/A The District's tank sites are generally climate change'. located in remote,high elevation, forested locations vulnerable to power outage,particularly during winter storms and wildfire.Data suggests that climate change will only increase the number and intensity of these types of incidents. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F N/A emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are F07 N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2.Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project,provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes F,-1 No Urban Water Use Efficiency ❑p Yes C No The management objective of this management strategy is to reduce water demand.If power supply is Project Template Page 6 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? uninterrupted at each of the water tank sites,water will not be drawn from the District's wells unnecessarily. prove Operational Efficiency and Transfe Conveyance-Regional/local F Yes P No System Reoperation F Yes F7 No Water Transfers F Yes F7 No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater Fv Yes F_ No The District is decreasing the volume of water wasted through the unnecessary pumping of groundwater (and the subsequent overflow of water storage tanks) Desalination r Yes 7 No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes F7 No Surface Storage--Regional/Local r Yes V No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes P_ No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes 7 No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F7 No Pollution Prevention F Yes P_ No Salt and Salinity Management F Yes P No Urban Runoff Management F Yes FYI No ctice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes F7 No Economic Incentives(Loans,Grants,and r Yes 7 No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes P_ No Forest Management F Yes ry-1 No Land Use Planning and Management r Yes F7 No Recharge Areas Protection r Yes 7 No Water-dependent Recreation F Yes F%O_ No Watershed Management F Yes ry-1 No rove Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes P7 No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Project Template Page 7 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Other RIMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing -Please provide any estimates of project cost,sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs,as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share:Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital(2013 Dollars) $450,000 $150,000 $600,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and 0 0 Maintenance(O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Yes r No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $100,000 0 Funding for permitting and construction contracting Phase 2 $100,000 0 Funding for year one of construction implementation Phase 3 $100,000 0 Funding for year two of construction implementation Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s)of funding for Project STPUD Capital $150,000 cost Improvement Funding d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Not applicable will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation(not grant funded). f.Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Project cost based on planning documents. planning,bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F Yes W No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Without the level sensor at each tank site the project is not funded. (300 words or less) communicating with its well or booster station,such as during an power outage,automatic control of the water system is lost,and the District must send out an operator to monitor the tank level,and then drive to the well/booster to start/stop pumps. Accessibility to these locations cannot be guaranteed,as road closures during inclement Project Template Page 9 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM weather events are possible.In these circumstances, control over the water tanks is completely lost; water services for residential,commercial and emergency response will be interrupted. Also,three of the District's water tanks have been identified to serve as communication hubs for the rest of the District's 100+remote facilities. Because of the hilly terrain,natural tree cover,and harsh climate,radio communications can be unreliable over long distances. To address this,the District has designed a communication network that relies on three tank locations as communication hubs to relay critical signals and data from the rest of the District's remote water and sewer facilities to its Operations Control Center. At these three tank sites in particular,backup power is essential to District Operations. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project,level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and ❑Yes 10/2014 Evaluation YES F ❑No ❑N/A b. Final Design ❑yes x No 10/2018 x c. Environmental F Yes 10/2018 Documentation xNo (CEQA/NEPA) Project Template Page 10 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Permitting ❑Yes 4/2018 6/2018 ❑ ❑No NO ❑N/A e. Construction F Yes 6/2018 8/2018 Contracting ❑ ❑No NO ❑N/A f. Construction ❑Yes 8/2018 12/2019 Implementation ❑ ❑No NO ❑N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents(date,title,author,and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Communications Study Workplan project is consistent with or supported by(e.g.General (adopted July 2017) Plans,UWMPs,GWMPs,Water Master Plans,Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs,Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the SCADA Technical Memorandum#1, feasibility of this project Communications Study Report December 2017, c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g.how much First, the existing system was research has been conducted)of the proposed project in mapped to gain a clear 300 words or less. understanding of how the system is currently configured,what issues the District has observed with system performance,and what type of communication failures have been observed within SCADA and at the remote sites. As a result of the mapping efforts,a snapshot of the existing system was created with Pathloss 5.0 virtual simulation software.The existing system model served as a baseline for development of new communication links associated with system improvements. A survey was undertaken before the development of the virtual model to ensure that the virtual model would take into account actual field data regarding the troublesome sites leading towards a virtual model grounded in observations at the field as opposed to assumptions and guesswork.This survey was intentionally focused on investigating historically troublesome sites for the District such as Fallen Leaf Lake area (Including Stanford Camp),Luther Pass,and Flagpole Booster. Project Template Page 12 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. ❑Yes F No ❑N/A alternate forms of energy,recycled materials,LID techniques,etc.) YES 1.If so please describe The District is proposing the use of solar arrays at several of the tank sites to ensure uninterrupted power supply at those locations. e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management ❑Yes F No ❑N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? YES 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A YES 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A (CWC§525) NO 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", ❑Yes F No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding YES Provide Explanation if necessary: The District has completed three of five phases of its Water Meter Installation Project.To date,###of a total of###meters have been Commented[RB1]:Need numbers here;the mainline didn't installed throughout the District's have them available service area. f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A 12/31/12)? N/A 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A to receiving project funding? N/A Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the ❑Yes F No F- N/A subject basin? YES Project Template Page 13 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the El YeS F No F N/A grant submittal date? N/A 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 14 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Raina Blasser Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive,South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title STPUD Waterline Replacement Projects Project Category F_ Water Supply/Wastewater Project Description (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Project includes replacement of approximately 20,192 words or less) linear feet of water main with new 8-inch water main and associated water services, water meters,fire hydrants, water main connections, site restoration including landscaping and paving replacement, and appurtenances. The project has two benefits: replacing aging, leaking water infrastructure to preserve water supplies and increasing the fire protection capabilities at the site. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 4 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Yes,STPUD has identified over 80,000 linear feet of If so provide description. waterline replacement in their service area that need to be upgraded to meet the new fire prevention mandates. This project will also contribute to the Lake Tahoe Fire Protection Partnership, a bi-state agency formed to increase the fire protection in the Lake Tahoe Basin by working collaboratively on identifying priority water supply projects that enhance fire protection. In addition, replacing leaking water infrastructure is a Best Management Practice as identified by the California Urban Water Conservation Council. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Political Support—List related MOUs, STPUD has an MOU with the CUWCC to implement water agreements or TACs currently in place. conservation Best Management Practices, including repairing/replacing leaking water delivery infrastructure. In addition,the waterline replacement project, as part of the larger Lake Tahoe Fire Protection Partnership, has the support of Senators Boxer and Feinstien, as well as the Fire Protection Districts and the community for its fire protection capabilities. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description (e.g.,along Glenwood Area, Sierra and Brockway water service areas the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the F Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water The waterline replacement supplied by public water systems r Yes project will upgrade continues to meet Federal and State X existing water system components with more standards. efficient and reliable infrastructure to ensure the continued compliance with State and Federal standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or Fv The waterline replacement replace infrastructure to reliably Yes project will upgrade supply water. F_ N/A existing water system components with more efficient and reliable infrastructure. WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F_ Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A Project Template Page 3 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for lv N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy lV N/A watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and lV N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with South Lake Tahoe is 20000 feet of public and private landowners, l0 Yes considered a high risk, replacement activities to manage forest health and wildland-urban interface water supply N/A fire area; for this reason, pipe increased wildfire risks. STPUD has a waterline to 8 inch for fire replacement program for suppression the entire delivery system efforts; 133 fire for upgrades that allow hydrants sufficient water pressure installed to and supply to protect provide for the homes and businesses residential during fire events. In addition, homes in the much of the community is project area. without fire hydrants and each waterline upgrade installs a fire hydrant on every 500 feet of waterline installed. Project Template Page 4 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The partnership consists of multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes all the water suppliers in Region for information exchange. the basin and works F N/A together to implement a variety of infrastructure improvements projects in order to provide a contiguous fire protection around the lake. IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, r Yes protection and restoration needs to r N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes F7 N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Every water conservation Leaking water water quality,water supply, F40 Yes effort is a direct benefit to supply groundwater recharge,flood future climate change distribution N/A effects, which call for pipes are management) in local and regional increased water storage estimated to planning efforts and support efforts and water supply. This contribute to to continue improving the science. project is the replacement 10% water of leaking water supply production loss. distribution pipes that will result in water savings IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. Project Template Page 5 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A Yes, South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community and the project is located in this community. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. r N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Water source storage and climate change'. availability will be affected by climate change, this program helps to increase available water supply for that eventuality e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Water conservation efforts result in emissions (e.g.green technology). less drinking water treatment and distribution. Water and wastewater treatment are identified as among the highest of energy users in the country. Less water production and distribution results in less energy utilized, leading to a reduction in ghg. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Project Template Page 7 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r Yes No Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes No The replacement of leaking water distribution pipes is identified as a Best Management Practice by the CUWCC. This project will implement this BMP and result in significant water savings. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local Yes V No This project is the improvement of local drinking water supply conveyance infrastructure. System Reoperation Yes F No Water Transfers F Yes IO No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F- Yes 170 No Desalination F- Yes l7 No Precipitation Enhancement No Recycled Municipal Water F Yes F No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes r No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and V Yes F- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F- Yes P-1 No Matching Water Quality to Use F- Yes Fv- No Pollution Prevention F- Yes Fv- No Salt and Salinity Management F- Yes P-1 No Urban Runoff Management F- Yes FV- No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship Yes V No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F- Yes 40 No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F- Yes FV- No Forest Management F Yes W No This project will result in improved fire fighting capacity, helping to protect the national forest within the STPUD service area. Project Template Page 8 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Land Use Planning and Management F Yes F No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes F No Water-dependent Recreation F Yes F No Watershed Management F Yes W No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes F No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage-CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 9 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 6,000,000 $2,000,000 0 $8,000,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and 37,500 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? V Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 2,000,000 Design, construction of the first phase of waterline installation. Phase 2 2,000,000 Design, construction of the second phase of waterline installation. Phase 3 2,000,000 Design, construction of the third phase of waterline installation. Phase 4 2,000,000 Design, construction of the fourth phase of waterline installation. Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project STPUD Capitol cost Improvement Funding d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M Costs are included in the STPUD will be financed for the 25-year planning general revenue budget annually. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Planning documents; historical information planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes %0 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if This project provides water savings as well the project is not funded. (300 words or less) as fire protection benefits. Both of these benefits would be lost without funding for Project Template Page 10 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM project implementation, leaving vulnerable commercial and residential areas without adequate fire protection. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and XF Yes Evaluation F No F N/A b. Final Design X F Yes F F No F N/A c. Environmental XF Yes All waterline Documentation F replacement projects (CEQA/NEPA) F No are covered under and F N/A MOU with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and are also Categorical Exempt under CEQA as maintenance on existing infrastructure. d. Permitting F Yes Permitting will be 03/17 4/17 identified and obtained X X� No during the construction F N/A contracting phase. e. Construction F Yes Project will need to be 05/17 10/21 Contracting bid and contracts Project Template Page 11 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM XF XF No executed. (if phased, go out four years) F N/A f. Construction F Yes Installation of the 05/17 10/21 Implementation linear feet of upgraded X X� No water lines, including F N/A installation of 7 fire hydrants. (If phased,go out four years) Provide explanation if more Projects are fully designed and environmental documentation than one project stage is complete, however, permitting, contracting and implementation checked as current status will all be completed upon funding allocation. Project Template Page 12 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Compliance with the National Fire project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Protection Association and the Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat California Fire Code standards; Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) California Urban Water Conservation Council's Best Management Implementation guidelines. b. List technical reports and studies supporting the feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much California State Fire Code has research has been conducted) of the proposed project in information on the size of water 300 words or less. supply lines necessary to provide the adequate fire flow for fire suppression; the California Urban Water Conservation Council has information on the water savings through repair of leaking water infrastructure. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F- Yes F- No X F- N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management XF- Yes F- No F- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? XF- Yes F- No F- N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements XF- Yes F- No F- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F- Yes F- No X F- N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No XF- N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior (— Yes F No X F- N/A Project Template Page 13 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the XF Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No X F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 14 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Raina Blasser Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Upper Montgomery Booster, Zone Improvements Project Category F Water Supply/Wastewater Project Description (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Upper Montgomery Estates Pump Station Replacement: words or less) Upper Montgomery Estates is currently fed by a small pump station with limited capacity. STPUD proposes to construct a new booster station that will provide at least 1,000 gpm with backup power. This will also improve flow for fire protection and redundancy in emergency conditions. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 5 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger This project was identified during a 5 year Water Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Optimization Planning process performed for STPUD If so provide description. infrastructure Political Support—List related MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description (e.g., along Upper Montgomery Estates the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the F Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as F Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water This project will provide supplied by public water systems r Yes additional water supplies for continues to meet Federal and State X both drinking water needs standards. and fire suppression. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1- Provide water supply to meet X Yes This project will provide projected demands for a 20-year additional water supplies for planning horizon. both drinking water needs and fire suppression. WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or Upgrade of water replace infrastructure to reliably Yes infrastructure to ensure supply water. r N/A sufficient water delivery needs WS3 - Implement and promote water xr N/A conservation measures and practices to meet state goals. GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with This project will provide public and private landowners, r Yes additional water supplies for activities to manage forest health and r N/A both drinking water needs wildfire risks. and fire suppression. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional This project is part of a water-related planning activities r Yes STPUD service area wide within the planning horizon as x p i; Water System Optimization supported by current and future Plan to determine the highest watershed science. priority water related needs IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among xr N/A multiple jurisdictions within the Region for information exchange. IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to r N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes r N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. X Yes Water source storage and water quality,water supply, availability will be affected groundwater recharge,flood by climate change, this management) in local and regional infrastructure upgrade helps to increase available planning efforts and support efforts water supply for that to continue improving the science. eventuality IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A Yes, South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community and the project is in this community c. Environmental Justice'considerations. I% N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Water source storage and climate change'. availability will be affected by climate change, this program helps to increase available water supply for that eventuality e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas x emissions (e.g.green technology). F- N/A f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- No x Urban Water Use Efficiency F7 Yes F- No Improves water supply delivery Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local V Yes No This project is the improvement of local drinking water supply conveyance infrastructure. System Reoperation F Yes F No Water Transfers F Yes F No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F Yes lv No Desalination F Yes Fy' No Precipitation Enhancement No Recycled Municipal Water F Yes lv No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes Iv No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes F No Improves drinking water Distribution distributions stem Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes lv No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Salt and Salinity Management F Yes FYI No Urban Runoff Management F Yes lv No ractice Resources SteZaTrclship 11 Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes P No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes FYI No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration r Yes Fy-' No Forest Management r Yes 1— No This project will result in improved firefighting capacity, helping to protect the national forest within the STPUD service area. Land Use Planning and Management r Yes Fv_' No Recharge Areas Protection r Yes V No Water-dependent Recreation r Yes V No Watershed Management F Yes 1V No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r- Yes r No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $ 325,000 0 975,000 OR 1,300,000 DAC 2. Annual Operations and 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F Yes 1%0 No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 This phase is for permitting 100,000 and construction contracting Phase 2 1,200,000 This phase is construction implementation Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project STPUD Capital 325,000 cost Improvement Funding d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs STPUD General Funds will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Planning documents; historical planning, bid,etc.) information g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if This project provides increased water the project is not funded. (300 words or less) storage and delivery as well as fire protection benefits. Both of these benefits would be lost without funding for project implementation, leaving vulnerable commercial and residential areas without adequate fire protection. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants: Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and X F Yes Complete and available Evaluation F in the STPUD Water F No System Optimization Plan F N/A b. Final Design F Yes Currently being X developed utilizing a No planning grant F N/A c. Environmental XF Yes Currently being Documentation developed utilizing a (CEQA/NEPA) No planning grant F N/A d. Permitting F Yes Will be developed during 1/1/2019 3/1/2019 construction contracting X X� No phase F N/A e. Construction F Yes 2/1/2019 5/1/2019 Contracting XF XF No F N/A f. Construction F Yes 5/1/2019 11/1/2021 Implementation XF XF No F N/A Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is Permitting, bid and award and construction implementation will all checked as current status need to be completed within one project timeframe. Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed STPUD Capital Improvement project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plan (adopted annually); Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Compliance with the National Fire Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Protection Association and the California Fire Code standards; b. List technical reports and studies supporting the feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The project is part of a larger research has been conducted) of the proposed project in water system optimization plan 300 words or less. that evaluated priority water improvements; California State Fire Code has information on the water storage capacity that is adequate fire flow for fire suppression; d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F- Yes F- No X F- N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management XF- Yes 17- No F- N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? XF- Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements XF- Yes F- No F- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F- Yes F- No X F- N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F- Yes F- No XF- N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F- Yes F- No X F- N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the XF- Yes F- No F- N/A subject basin? Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No X F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Raina Blasser Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title H-Street Zone Booster, Fire Pump Improvements Project Category F_ Water Supply/Wastewater Project Description The H Street Water Zone is currently fed by two small pump (Briefly describe the project, in 300 stations with limited capacity that are aged and deteriorating. words or less) This project would construct a new booster station with at least 1000 gpm and backup power in case of emergency as well as implement a fire pump. This would not only improve the water delivery system in that zone, but would provide fire protection as well. Total number of projects submitted by 10 Project Prioritization: your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this project 6 (e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a This project is part of a District-wide Water Infrastructure larger Project (e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Improvement project. Phase 2 of 3) ? If so provide description. Political Support—List related MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Longitude: Project Location Description (e.g., Emerald Bay Road, H Street along the south bank of stream/river between river miles or Tahoe Sierra IRWM miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the F Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as F Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water This project will provide supplied by public water systems r Yes additional water supplies for continues to meet Federal and State r N/A both drinking water needs standards. and fire suppression. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1- Provide water supply to meet This project will provide projected demands for a 20-year r Yes additional water supplies for planning horizon. r N/A both drinking water needs and fire suppression. WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or Upgrade of water replace infrastructure to reliably Fv Yes infrastructure to ensure supply water. r N/A efficient water delivery needs WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural F N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with This project will provide public and private landowners, r Yes additional water supplies for activities to manage forest health and r N/A both drinking water needs wildfire risks. and fire suppression. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional This project is part of a water-related planning activities Fv Yes STPUD service area wide within the planning horizon as r N/A Water System Optimization supported by current and future Plan to determine the highest watershed science. priority water related need IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes Region for information exchange. r N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, r Yes protection and restoration needs to iv N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes FV N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Water source storage and water quality,water supply, r Yes availability will be affected groundwater recharge,flood by climate change, this management) in local and regional r N/A infrastructure upgradehelps to increase available planning efforts and support efforts water supply for that to continue improving the science. eventuality IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 5 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A Yes, South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community and the project is in this community c. Environmental Justice'considerations. F7 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Water source storage and climate change'. availability will be affected by climate change, this program helps to increase available water supply for that eventuality e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes Fv- No Urban Water Use Efficiency Fv- Yes F- No Improves water supply delivery for an urban water supplier Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local Fv- Yes F- No This project improves local drinking water supply conveyance infrastructure. Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? System Reoperation F Yes Iv No Water Tra nsfe rs F Yes Iv No Increase Water Suppl Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes IVY' No Desalination F Yes Iv No Precipitation Enhancement No Recycled Municipal Water F Yes 1740 No Surface Storage -- Regional/Local F Yes Fy-' No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and 1740 Yes F No Improves drinking water Distribution distributions stem Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes FV_ No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes 171 No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Salt and Salinity Management F Yes Iv No Urban Runoff Management F Yes F No ractice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes FY-1 No Economic Incentives(Loans, Grants,and F Yes r No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes ry-1 No Forest Management F Yes IO No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes ry-1 No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes 77 No Water-dependent Recreation r Yes iV No Watershed Management r Yes V No prove Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes I1 No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $ 100,000 0 300,000 OR 400,000 DAC 2. Annual Operations and 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F Yes Id No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 0 This is the planning and 100,000 design phase Phase 2 150,000 0 This is the first year of construction implementation Phase 3 150,000 0 This is the second year of construction implementation Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project STPUD Capital 100,000 cost Improvement Funding d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs STPUD General Funds will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Planning documents; historical information planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes IV No h.Please describe what impact there may be if This project provides increased water the project is not funded. (300 words or less) storage and delivery as well as fire protection benefits. Both of these benefits would be lost without funding for project implementation, leaving vulnerable commercial and residential areas without adequate fire protection. Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and X F Yes Complete and available Evaluation F in the STPUD Water NO System Optimization Plan F N/A b. Final Design F Yes This project is in the 1/2018 4/2018 planning and design x x� No phase. F N/A c. Environmental F Yes Environmental will be 1/2018 4/2018 Documentation F F No completed in the (CEQA/NEPA) planning and design F N/A phase d. Permitting F Yes Permitting will be 1/2018 4/2018 completed in the X� NO planning and design F N/A phase e. Construction F Yes 5/2018 10/2018 Contracting XF No F N/A f. Construction F Yes 5/2019 10/2021 Implementation XF No F N/A Project Template Page 10 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed STPUD Capital Improvement Plan project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General (adopted annually); Compliance with Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat the National Fire Protection Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Association and the California Fire Code standards; b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Provide explanation if more than feasibility of this project one project stage is checked as current status c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The project is part of a larger water research has been conducted) of the proposed project in system optimization plan that 300 words or less. evaluated priority water improvements; d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes F No X F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management XF Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? XF Yes 17- No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements XF Yes F No F- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No X F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No XF N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No X F- N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the XF Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes No X N/A grant submittal date? Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization South Tahoe Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Lynn Nolan Name of Secondary Contact Raina Blasser Mailing Address 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA, 96150 E-mail Inolan@stpud.dst.ca.us Phone (###)###-#### 530-543-6215 Other Cooperating The District will consider and incorporate affected landowners Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders into project design. Is your agency/organization Yes. committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Wastewater Force Main Bypass Projects Project Category XF Water Supply/Wastewater Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The Force Main Bypass Projects will include installation of (Briefly describe the project, in 300 tees with isolation valves at specific intervals along the words or less) existing force mains.The tees and valves will be placed to allow the use of temporary hose between two tees to span a broken section of pipe.These bypass locations will allow wastewater delivery to the treatment plant to continue while repairs along the broken section of pipe are made. These projects will provide redundancy for the force mains in the District's wastewater delivery system by creating an effective way to bypass the section of pipe being repaired. Total number of projects 10 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 10 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger This project is part of a larger Wastewater System Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Improvement Project as defined by the Wastewater System If so provide description. Master Plan completed by STPUD in 2007. Political Support—List related MOUs, N/A agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: . Latitude: 38.922139 Longitude: -119.969428 Project Location Description (e.g., along Projects are located in the service area of South Lake Tahoe the south bank of stream/river Public Utility District at operating sites throughout the City of between river miles or miles from South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Towns/intersection and/or address): III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the F Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by These projects provide an implementing measures such as Fv Yes effective way to bypass stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A sections of pipe being control/restoration to meet Water repaired to ensure sewage is Quality Objectives(WQOs)for delivered to the Waste Water receiving water bodies established in Treatment Plant in a safe, the Basin Plan within the planning timely, and effective manner. horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water Preventing contamination of supplied by public water systems F%0_ Yes surface and groundwater continues to meet Federal and State r_ N/A supplies in the District's standards. service area has determined the need for these projects. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or Projects will further ensure replace infrastructure for reliable FV Yes the clean operation of the collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A District's wastewater wastewater. components. Project Template Page 2 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or Projects will ensure the replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes continual operation of water supply water. 17- N/A supply and collection by building and replacing infrastructure. WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural F N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy N/A watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. Project Template Page 3 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The District is immersed in multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes the business of IRWM and Region for information exchange. r N/A readily shares information about the District's projects. IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, r Yes protection and restoration needs to r N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes r N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge,flood F N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 4 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 5 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A Yes, South Lake Tahoe is a designated disadvantaged community and the project is located in this community. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. F7 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A climate change'. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F470 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local IO Yes F No Projects will allow for an effective way to bypass the section of pipe being repaired and as a result provide continual transport of wastewater. System Reoperation r Yes f- No Project Template Page 6 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F_ Yes FV_ No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F_ Yes FV_ No Desalination F Yes P-0 No Precipitation Enhancement NO Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes Fv- No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes Fv- No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes Fv- No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes P-0 No Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes P No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Projects provide alternative conveyance options during times of necessary repair work on force mains and piping Salt and Salinity Management Yes P-1 No Urban Runoff Management 1— Yes FV_ No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes P07 No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F_ Yes Fv- No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F_ Yes FV_ No Forest Management F_ Yes FV_ No Land Use Planning and Management F_ Yes FV_ No Recharge Areas Protection F_ Yes FV_ No Water-dependent Recreation F_ Yes FV_ No Watershed Management F_ Yes FV_ No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes P-0 No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 8 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 731,250 $243,750 975,000 OR %0 DAC 2. Annual Operations and 0 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F Yes I No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 50,000 0 Assessment and evaluation, planning documents, construction bids Phase 2 225,000 0 Construction implementation, phase 1 Phase 3 350,000 0 Construction implementation, phase 2 Phase 4 350,000 0 Construction implementation, phase 3 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project STPUD Capital 243,750 cost Improvement Funding d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs STPUD General Funds will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Concepts based off previous installation and planning, bid,etc.) maintenance projects. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes 97 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Without project funding,the installation of critical the project is not funded. (300 words or less) bypass infrastructure in the District's service area will be delayed. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants: Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Yes 5/2018 8/2018 Evaluation r No CURRENT F N/A PROJECT STAG Ex b. Final Design 7 Yes 8/2018 10/2018 F W No c. Environmental F_ Yes 10/2018 3/2019 Documentation F P-1 No (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F_ Yes 10/2018 3/2019 F W No F N/A e. Construction F_ Yes 10/2018 3/2019 Contracting F W No F N/A f. Construction F_ Yes 5/2019 10/2021 Implementation F WO No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed South Tahoe Public Utility District project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Ten-Year Plan, Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Currently unavailable feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Research is forthcoming research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. Yes V No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management r Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? r Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements V Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No F_ N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No to receiving project funding? +� N/A Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F No F N/A subject basin? Yes 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes No V N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: Project Proponent Information Tahoe City Public Utility District Agency/Organization Name of Primary Contact Kurt Althof Name of Secondary Contact Tony Laliotis Mailing Address PO Box 5249,Tahoe City, CA 96145 E-mail kalthof@tcpud.or , tlaliotis@tcpud.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-580-6057, 530-580-6053 Other Cooperating North Tahoe Fire Protection District, Placer County Water Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Agency, State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water(DDW),Tahoe Park Water Co. Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain I. General Project Information Project Title Tahoe City Emergency Water Supply Project Category QF Water Supply/Wastewater F_ Restoration F_ Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The Tahoe City Main public water system is the largest (Briefly describe the project, in 300 in the Tahoe City Public Utility District's service area words or less) and currently relies primarily on two groundwater wells for drinking water production. During the summer months, which coincide with peak water demand conditions, failure of either well would result in water rationing and the need to activate an emergency lake intake for water supply. This project will construct a critical connection between an existing and operable Lake water intake and the Tahoe City main domestic water system. Initially, this will provide an emergency and drought resilient water source. Raw water from this project could be used immediately under a "boil water" alert or portable water treatment could be staged at the terminus of the water line for emergency water treatment and supply. A permanent treatment plant may also be constructed at a later date providing an alternate source to the system's groundwater reliance. This project will also directly benefit the Tahoe Park Water system due to the impending intertie with the Tahoe City main water system. Furthermore, raw water may be used as an irrigation source for the Tahoe City Golf Course, allowing for the deconstruction of an existing dam, ending the water Tahoe Sierra IRWM diversion and the rehabilitation of a wetlands, currently used for irrigation purposes. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 of 3 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes, this project would allow for the restoration of Burton Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Creek and the associated wetlands currently being used as If so provide description. an irrigation water source for the Tahoe City Golf Course. Political Support—List related MOUs, Placer County Water Agency,Tahoe Park Water Co., agreements or TACs currently in place. California State Parks Project Location: Latitude: 39.171525 Longitude: -120.138628 Project Location Description (e.g.,along The termination of Grove St. in Tahoe City, CA 96145 at the the south bank of stream/river existing lake intake and pump station. between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): II. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. Project Template Page 2 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as r Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water In the event the current This project supplied by public water systems P Yes groundwater source no would provide continues to meet Federal and State r_ N/A longer met drinking the option of standards. standards, the surface water subsidizing or option with the addition of a replacing ground temporary or permanent water source(s) water treatment plant would as needed to ensure the standards are continually meet continually met. drinking water standards and demand. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, This project would allow for Removal of the wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes the restoration of the Burton dam and restore to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A Creek stream and wetlands the natural path processes. area. California State Parks is of Burton Creek able and willing to do this along with restoration but it hinges on approximately the ability of TCPUD to 0.2 acres of secure the surface water wetlands source this project will restoration. provide. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 3 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1- Provide water supply to meet Lake Tahoe is a near infinite, Provides access projected demands for a 20-year r Yes drought resilient, water to the planning horizon. r NSA source. This project ensures approximate 39 water supply needs will be trillion gallons of met for well more than 20 water in Lake years for the Tahoe City Tahoe (water water system and all rights already connected systems such as exist) Tahoe Park Water Co. WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or FV This new infrastructure will Provides access replace infrastructure to reliably Yes ensure a reliable water to the supply water. 17- NSA supply regardless of approximate 39 groundwater conditions. trillion gallons of water in Lake Tahoe (water rights already exist) WS3 - Implement and promote water Water conservation conservation measures and practices F Yes measures are already in place to meet state goals. r NSA for all of TCPUD water customers Project Template Page 4 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of Objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM1 - Maintain and monitor V Yes This project can allow surface 200 million groundwater supply to assure future water to subsidize or gallons of ground reliability. N/A substitute the existing water are used in ground water supply as this system needed. annually. This project would provide an immediate emergency supply should groundwater become unreliable. It will also provide the ability to subsidize with surface water would lessen the demand on groundwater GWM2 - Promote groundwater The opportunity to not rely Reduce the 200 protection activities for high quality %i Yes exclusively on groundwater, million gallon a groundwater, and advocate for r N/A immediately or in the future year demand on improvements to impacted will allow for less impact on groundwater. groundwater quality through public groundwater sources, education. providing more time to recharge as needed. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for Raw water made available Approximately 17 multiple uses (e.g. V Yes from this project will be used million gallons of municipal/industrial/agricultural N/A for irrigation, industrial, and water are used to supply and environmental use). other non-potable purposes irrigate the golf thereby reducing the course each demand for potable ground summer. This water for such uses. project would save a minimum of that amount of potable ground water each year. Project Template Page 5 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water This project would potentially The restoration bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes allow for the transfer of pre- would include the associated uplands to support healthy r N/A 1914 water rights from removal of a watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife Burton Creek to Lake Tahoe dam, returning and plant habitats. and to provide opportunity the creek to its for restoration of sensitive natural path, and watershed habitat. restoring 0.2 acres of wetlands ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with The restoration of the Burton The restoration public and private landowners, r Yes Creek wetlands area would portion of the activities to manage forest health and r N/A allow for increased forest project will wildfire risks. health measures and a include some reduced wildfire risk. forest thinning California State Parks is and restore a willing and able to do the natural fire restoration. barrier. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts R Yes The secondary project of Restoring 0.2 caused by existing and new removing the dam at Burton acres of wetlands development. F N/A Creek and restoring the and stream path. wetlands would reverse ecosystem impacts. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as F N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. r N/A Project Template Page 6 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, r Yes protection and restoration needs to r N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that The removal of the Burton Potential water reduce flood risk. R Yes Creek dam and watershed volume held at r N/A restoration reduces the risk Burton Creek of a dam failure and potential dam is 450,000 subsequent flooding. gallons in the lower pond and an estimated 1,000,000 gallons in the upper pond. A Dam failure could cause isolated flooding. Removal of that dam eliminates that risk. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. This project ensures a Lake Tahoe holds water quality,water supply, r Yes drought resilient water approximately 39 groundwater recharge,flood r N/A supply is available regardless trillion gallons of management) in local and regional of adverse effects of climate extremely high planning efforts and support efforts change. quality water. to continue improving the science. Water treatment would still be required, however supply is nearly infinite IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 7 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM This project addresses 12 of the 22 IRWM plan objectives. Project Template Page 8 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Provides for a near infinite and climate climate change'. change/drought resilient water source. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. III. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F470 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F7 Yes F- No Raw water would be used for non- potable applications, saving up to 15- 20 million gallons of potable water per year. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local P Yes F No The emergency interconnect with the Tahoe Park Water Co. will allow for regional conveyance of water produced by this project Project Template Page 9 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? System Reoperation FV- Yes F- No This project will allow for the reoperation of an existing but dormant lake intake providing more and diverse Water Transfers F Yes]FV- No water source options in the system. Water Transfers r Yes � No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater W Yes No Will allow for the combined use of ground and surface water supply sources and therefore conjunctive management of the resources as needed. Desalination r Yes FV- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water I— Yes FV- No Not allowed by Federal Law in the Project area. Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local FV- Yes F- No This project takes full advantage of the surface storage capacity of Lake Tahoe and a multiple use water source Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F- Yes P-0 No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F- Yes FV- No Matching Water Quality to Use r Yes F No In addition to a secondary/emergency source,this project also provides the ability to use raw untreated water for irrigation, construction and other non- potable water needs Pollution Prevention r%O- Yes F- No The removal of a dam and restoration of the creek and wetlands would reduce flood risk, and reduce possible sediment deposition. Salt and Salinity Management F- Yes P-0 No Urban Runoff Management F- Yes F%-O No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F- Yes P-0 No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F- Yes FV- No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration FV- Yes F- No Allows for the restoration of the Burton Creek wetlands and water diversion would no longer be needed. Forest Management F- Yes FV- No Land Use Planning and Management F- Yes F%-O No Recharge Areas Protection F- Yes Fv- No Project Template Page 10 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water-dependent Recreation F Yes V No Watershed Management F- Yes V No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management FV_ Yes F No The removal of a dam and restoration of the creek and wetlands would reduce flood risk. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 11 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IV. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $706,641 $143,696 $0 $850,337 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $10,000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F Yes W- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project NA $0 cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding California Tahoe $300,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Conservancy(TBD) e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs TCPUD Board of Directors fully supports this project will be financed for the 25-year planning and will commit to cover all O&M through the period for project implementation (not grant annual water utility operating budget. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Planning, Design,and CEQA have been completed the project is not funded. (300 words or less) on this project. The District is committed to completing the project but without funding the construction of the project will likely be delayed until other funding is secured and/or there is funding available in a future year capital budget. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 12 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/Ac Planned/Act Current in Each Project Stage tual Start ual Project Date Completion Stage (mm/yr) Date (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes Completed May 2014 October Evaluation F 2014 � No F N/A b. Final Design F Yes 0 90% plans (ongoing) May 2015 May 2016 F F No F N/A c. Environmental F Yes Completed July November Documentation F 2015 2015 (CEQA/NEPA) No F N/A d. Permitting F Yes March May 2016 0 F No 0 2015 F N/A e. Construction F Yes Pending Contracting F F No Funding 0 F N/A f. Construction F Yes Pending Implementation F F No 0 Funding F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 13 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 14 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers) that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Our existing Urban Water project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Management Plan and the current Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat UWMP update (in progress) Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Technical Design Memo (TDM) feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis (e.g. how much The TDM describes the importance research has been conducted) of the proposed project in of an emergency surface water 300 words or less. source (reducing reliance on exclusive groundwater sources),the benefit of raw water usage for non- potable applications, and the estimated water volume that could be provided. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes 0 F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management QF Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? RI Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements QF Yes F- No F- N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F- No 0 F- N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP (due F Yes F No Q F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F- No 0 F- N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F- No 0E- N/A subject basin? Project Template Page 15 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No OF N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 16 of 16 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I.Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Tahoe City Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Kurt Althof Name of Secondary Contact Tony Laliotis Mailing Address PO Box 5249,Tahoe City, CA 96145 E-mail kalthof@tcpud.org, tlaliotis@tcpud.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-580-6057, 530-580-6053 Other Cooperating North Tahoe Fire Protection District, Placer County Water Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Agency, CA Water Board Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Westshore Regional Water Storage Tanks Project Category XF_ Water Supply/Wastewater 17- Restoration 1 Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description This project focuses on the water storage component (Briefly describe the project, in 300 needs on the West Shore of Lake Tahoe. The West Shore words or less) is comprised of many privately owned water systems, many of which are very small, under-capitalized, and lack adequate infrastructure. Several of these systems are currently transitioning to public ownership but the region is still lacking in sufficient water storage capacity. The addition of two new storage tanks that could be shared by both private and public systems would dramatically improve the fire suppression capacity necessary to better protect private property and federal lands. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 3 of 3 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger The surrounding small independent water providers are Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? significantly undercapitalized and unlikely to continue If so provide description. meeting drinking water and/or fire protection standards much into the future. Regional shared storage will help all water providers in the region. Political Support-List related MOUs, Placer County Water Agency,Tahoe Park Water Co., CA agreements or TACs currently in place. I Water Board. Project Location: Latitude: Longitude: Project Location Description (e.g., Two water storage tanks are proposed in this project. One Tahoe Sierra IRWM along the south bank of stream/river to be located in Homewood CA and the second to be between river miles or miles from located approximately halfway between Tahoe City and Towns/intersection and/or address): Homewood CA. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the F Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as F Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion R N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water Providing sufficient water This project could supplied by public water systems r Yes storage that can be shared by impact up to 6 continues to meet Federal and State r N/A multiple water companies water companies standards. will ensure that water and storage capacity will meet approximately State and Federal water 3,000 standards. connections. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. Project Template Page 2 of 11 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. R N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or Many water systems outside Provides access replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes the TCPUD system do not to the 1 million supply water. r N/A have a secondary supply nor gallons of water do they have adequate water storage the new storage. In addition to the tanks will provide interties,the regional water storage will increase reliability of supply. WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). Project Template Page 3 of 11 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of Yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Provides critical water Water storage public and private landowners, Fv Yes storage currently not would help meet activities to manage forest health and r N/A available to many providers fire suppression wildfire risks. in the region thereby standards in significantly increasing fire regions currently suppression capabilities. not meeting those standards. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among multiple jurisdictions within the F Yes Region for information exchange. r N/A IWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, F Yes protection and restoration needs to r N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes r N/A Project Template Page 4 of 11 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. This project will help provide This project will water quality,water supply, r Yes drought resilient water allow for the groundwater recharge,flood F N/A supply to a greater number storage of water management) in local and regional of systems and customers in from multiple planning efforts and support efforts the region providing access sources across to continue improving the science. to a more diversified water the region and supply system. improve conditions due to drought and climate change IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 11 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Provides for better drought resilient climate change'. water supply and storage across the region by providing shared infrastructure. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F- Yes F7 No System Reoperation F- Yes F7 No Water Transfers F Yes P No Project Template Page 6 of 11 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater .V Yes No This project will help facilitate the use and storage of ground and surface water supply sources in more than one system. Desalination F Yes F No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes P No Surface Storage -- Regional/Local F Yes F No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F No Water Storage would improve water Distribution distribution, particularly fire flows. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes 1740 No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Salt and Salinity Management F Yes F No Urban Runoff Management F Yes 1740 No Practic urces Stewar ship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes F No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes 1740 No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes ry-1 No Forest Management F Yes W No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes ry-1 No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes ry-1 No Water-dependent Recreation F Yes W No Watershed Management F Yes ry-1 No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes r No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 11 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 8 of 11 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $2,126,925 $2,126,925 $0 4,253,850 OR f DAC 2. Annual Operations and $30,000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes I No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $2,126,925 $15,000 Tank 1 Phase 2 $2,126,925 $15,000 Tank 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project TBD cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding Placer County Water Probable amount TBD and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Agency e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M Costs will be absorbed into the annual TCPUD will be financed for the 25-year planning operating budget which is funded by rates. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Planning,design and construction from other tank planning, bid, etc.) projects g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes V No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Without funding this project is unlikely to be the project is not funded. (300 words or less) completed as the individual systems benefiting most do not have the financial ability. The lack of water storage could be catastrophic in the event of a wildfire or issues with single water sources in any given system. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants: Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 11 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and Q F Yes Evaluation r F No 0 F N/A b. Final Design F Yes F F No F N/A c. Environmental F Yes Documentation F F No (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting F Yes F F No F N/A e. Construction F Yes Contracting F F No F N/A f. Construction F Yes Implementation F F No F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 11 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Our existing Urban Water project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Management Plan and the current Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat UWMP update, State Water Board Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Master Plans b. List technical reports and studies supporting the feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much research has been conducted) of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes 0 F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No 0 F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No Q F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No 0 F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No 0 F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F_ No 0 F_ N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 11 of 11 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: Project Proponent Information Tahoe City Public Utility District Agency/Organization Name of Primary Contact Kurt Althof Name of Secondary Contact Tony Laliotis Mailing Address PO Box 5249,Tahoe City, CA 96145 E-mail kalthof@tcpud.or , tlaliotis@tcpud.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-580-6057, 530-580-6053 Other Cooperating State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Water(DDW), Placer County Water Agency, CA Tahoe Conservancy, JMA Ventures, Tahoe Water Suppliers Association Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain I. General Project Information Project Title West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant Project Category BF Water Supply/Wastewater F Restoration F Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant (Briefly describe the project, in 300 project is the construction of a permanent surface water words or less) treatment plant on the West Shore of Lake Tahoe utilizing Lake Tahoe as the water source. Drinking water service along the West Shore of Lake Tahoe suffers from an inefficient,ineffective,disjointed, delivery system. Separate water systems were constructed subdivision by subdivision,and most are well over 40 years old,some dating back to the early 1900's. There are seven different water systems serving approximately 2,800 connections and none are in full compliance with current DDW standards. Some are in violation of primary drinking water standards and others are in violation of secondary drinking water standards.All have source capacity issues for either their primary or back-up sources and there is a lack of adequate storage to meet fire suppression standards throughout the area. Due to the small numbers of connections in each system (most are under 500) these systems are significantly undercapitalized to meet today's drinking water standards.The West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant project will provide an adequate water source to address these water supply needs on an integrated,regional basis. The project replaces an interim seasonal water treatment Tahoe Sierra IRWM plant that TCPUD constructed in 2004.The interim plant has far exceeded its useful life and needs to be replaced. The West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Plant provides a long-term solution to water source and delivery needs along the West Shore of Lake Tahoe and offers an integrated,regional approach to improving water quality and water delivery. Total number of projects 3 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 of 3 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes.The West Lake Tahoe Regional Water Treatment Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Plant(WLTRWTP) will replace an existing seasonal If so provide description. treatment plant that produces 300 GPM. The new plant will have the capacity to serve up to seven water companies, producing up to 1,100 GPM along the West Shore of Lake Tahoe. The current project is set up in 2 Phases, Phase 1 provides for up to 650 GPM and is scalable to Phase 2 producing up to 1,100 GPM. Political Support—List related MOUs, TCPUD and the McKinney Water District currently have a agreements or TACs currently in place. Mutual Water Aid Agreement in place and the new treatment plant will have the capacity to provide water for up to all seven of the water companies along the West Shore of Lake Tahoe.TCPUD anticipates agreements with a minimum of three additional water companies in the project area.The project is supported by Placer County Water Agency(they approved a grant for preliminary study and a bag filter test) the DDW and the State Water Resources Control Board (approved a planning and design grant) Project Location: Latitude: 39.072741 Longitude: -120.144584 Project Location Description (e.g.,along Project location is on the southwest corner of Lodge Drive the south bank of stream/river and State Route 89 in Tahoma, CA 96142 on the West Shore between river miles or miles from of Lake Tahoe. Project is located approximately 8 miles south Towns/intersection and/or address): of Tahoe City, CA 96145 II. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Project Template Page 2 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by The new treatment plant Improves implementing measures such as FV Yes replaces an interim approximately stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A treatment plant that is in 1,000 sq. ft of control/restoration to meet Water the floodplain of McKinney floodplain. Quality Objectives(WQOs)for Creek.As part of the project, receiving water bodies established in the interim plant will be the Basin Plan within the planning removed,improving the horizon. floodplain. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water Currently,seven separate The new supplied by public water systems P Yes water systems along the treatment plant continues to meet Federal and State F N/A West Shore of Lake Tahoe can provide an standards. provide water service to emergency back- 2,800 residents and up supply or businesses. None of these primary supply systems is in full for all seven compliance with DDW water systems. standards.Two are in violation of primary drinking water standards and all have source capacity issues. In addition,there is a lack of adequate water storage to meet fire suppression standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. Project Template Page 3 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet The new water treatment The current plant projected demands for a 20-year r Yes plant will increase water produces 300 planning horizon. production significantly and GPM,the new r N/A meet projected demands for plant will up to seven water systems, produce up to for the life of the project(50 years). 1,100 GPM in Phase 2. WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or Fv The interim water Project will replace infrastructure to reliably Yes treatment plant has provide a reliable supply water. F N/A outlived its useful life and source of will be removed. It will be drinking water replaced to reliably supply water to up to 2,800 for seven water residents and businesses. systems and up to 2,800 connections. WS3 - Implement and promote water Water conservation conservation measures and practices r Yes measures are already in to meet state goals. r N/A place for all TCPUD customers. GWM1- Maintain and monitor Yes Constructing a new The new plant rated surface reduces the groundwater supply to assure future integrated reliability. r N/A treatment plant will area's improve the overall,long- dependence on term management of the groundwater as region's groundwater the only source resources by providing a of water supply. viable alternative to The projected groundwater for up to regional seven water systems. maximum daily demand is 1,577 gpm,all currently supplied by ground water Project Template Page 4 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F- Yes associated uplands to support healthy F N/A watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and F N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with The construction of the Fire protection public and private landowners, 1740 Yes WLTRWTP addresses a for over 2,000 activities to manage forest health and F- N/A critical need by increasing acres of land and wildfire risks. the quantity of water up to 2,800 available for emergency fire homes and protection. businesses. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes Constructing one One integrated, � caused by existing and new integrated,regional water regional water development. f- N/A treatment plant instead of treatment plant multiple treatment facilities instead multiple minimizes the impact on the treatment plants environment. and/or additional groundwater wells. Project Template Page 5 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project is an TCPUD, multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes integrated,regional project McKinney Water Region for information exchange. that solves water delivery District, Madden F N/A issues for up to seven water Creek Water Co., systems.The project involves collaboration with Tahoe Cedars the seven independent Water Co.,Tahoe water systems. Swiss Village Utilities, Skyland/Nielsen Water Co. & Timberland Water Co. Project Template Page 6 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of Objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and By making surface water the Completion of awareness of watershed functions, F40- Yes primary source for the Watershed protection and restoration needs to r N/A region,Title 22, State Code of Survey's and encourage stewardship by the public. Regulations requires public membership water systems to conduct a participation in comprehensive sanitary the Tahoe Water survey of its watersheds Suppliers every five years.The purpose Association; of this survey is to identify whose mission is: actual or potential sources of "to develop, contamination in the implement and watersheds, and any other maintain an factors which are capable of effective producing adverse effects on watershed control the quality of water used for program to satisfy domestic drinking water. recommendations Therefore increased public in watershed education is paramount to sanitary surveys, encourage protection and advocate for the stewardship by the public. protection of Lake Tahoe as a viable source of drinking water, and to satisfy additional state and federal requirements." IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes F N/A Project Template Page 7 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. A regional treatment plan Seven water water quality,water supply, r Yes provides a consolidated systems are groundwater recharge,flood approach to more efficiently dependent on management) in local and regional N/A use and manage limited groundwater planning efforts and support efforts water resources. Building a sources.Thisproject to continue improving the science. surface water treatment addresses plant diversifies water climate change sources allowing the region and drought to continue having secure resiliency for all water sources in the face of systems in the drought and climate change region. impacts. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 8 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A A portion of the project area serves a low income and economically disadvantaged community. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A The new plant diversifies water climate change'. sources,providing a drought resilient source of water to ensure region's adaptation to climate change. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A By consolidating facilities,there will emissions (e.g.green technology). be fewer plants operated,and a reduction in number of vehicle miles traveled for maintenance and monitoring.The single regional solution approach reduces greenhouse gas emissions and energy used. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Other benefits of the project include: not already mentioned elsewhere. the enhancement of a popular public/private beach on Lake Tahoe. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. III. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F7 No Project Template Page 9 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Urban Water Use Efficiency r Yes F- No The WLTRWTP will allow for water use efficiency if/when system consolidation occurs. In the short term it provides for economic efficiency as it will eliminate the need of individual water providers to construct multiple facilities and additional infrastructure to meet standards. Improve Operational Efficiency a Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes F- No Existing and new interconnections with the independent Water Companies will allow for regional conveyance of water produced by this project. System Reoperation r Yes FV- No Water Transfers F- Yes F4-0 No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes F- No Currently all seven water systems are dependent on groundwater sources.The new surface water treatment plant diversifies water sources and reduces the dependency on groundwater. Desalination r Yes FV- No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes FV- No Not allowed by Federal Law in the Project area. Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local r Yes F- No The WLTRWTP involves the construction of a surface water treatment plant utilizing Lake Tahoe as the water source. This will provide the region the ability to access and store an abundance of surface water even during extreme drought and low ground water levels. Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and FV- Yes F- No The new treatment plant provides a Distribution reliable supply of safe drinking water that meets all State and Federal regulations,for up to seven water systems along the West Shore of Lake Tahoe. Project Template Page 10 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes V No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes IV No Pollution Prevention I Yes No California's Surface Water Treatment Rule Title 22,State Code of Regulations requires that every public water system using surface water conduct a comprehensive sanitary survey of its watersheds every five years.The purpose of a watershed sanitary survey is to identify actual or potential sources of contamination in the watersheds, and any other watershed related factors which are capable of producing adverse effects on the quality of water used for domestic drinking water purposes. Salt and Salinity Management Yes No Urban Runoff Management F Yes No California s Surface Water Treatment Rule Title 22,State Code of Regulations requires that every public water system using surface water conduct a comprehensive sanitary survey of its watersheds every five years.The purpose of a watershed sanitary survey is to identify actual or potential sources of contamination in the watersheds, and any other watershed related factors which are capable of producing adverse effects on the quality of water used for domestic drinking water purposes. Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes F7 No Economic Incentives(Loans, Grants, and I7 Yes F No The construction of one,regional, Water Pricing) water treatment plant solution will provide a great economy of scale and eliminate the need to build and fund multiple such projects throughout the region. The treatment plant is being scaled to satisfy the needs of all water systems in the region allowing for a single,regional solution,and incrementally lower the cost per gallon of water produced. Project Template Page 11 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Ecosystem Restoration V Yes No The new treatment plant replaces an interim treatment plant that is in the floodplain of McKinney Creek.As part of the project,the interim plant will be removed,improving the floodplain. Forest Management W Yes F No The construction of a regional water treatment plant increases the quantity of water available for emergency fire protection for over 2,000 acres of land and 2800 residences and businesses on the West Shore of Lake Tahoe. Land Use Planning and Management W Yes F No Constructing the WLTRWTP provides a more efficient and effective use of land on the West Shore of Lake Tahoe. One regional solution versus up to seven different treatment plants provides better use of land and a more efficient way to deliver water. Recharge Areas Protection F Yes No There is not a recharge area however the new treatment plant provides an alternative to groundwater allowing for longer recharge durations. Water-dependent Recreation F Yes No Lake Tahoe provides a precious outdoor recreation facility.The new treatment plant will replace the interim treatment plant that is located in a heavily used recreational area,providing improved access to publicly owned lakeshore. Watershed Management Yes No California s Surface Water Treatment Rule Title 22,State Code of Regulations requires that every public water system using surface water conduct a comprehensive sanitary survey of its watersheds every five years.The purpose of a watershed sanitary survey is to identify actual or potential sources of contamination in the watersheds, and any other watershed related factors which are capable of producing adverse effects on the quality of water used for domestic drinking water purposes. Project Template Page 12 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes FV_ No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage-CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: N/A Project Template Page 13 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM IV. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital $8,840,833 $2,500,000 $500,000 $9,465,592 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $140,568 $140,568 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F Yes F,/- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project PCWA $32,500 cost SRF $500,000 d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding CDPH SRF, CDPH $2,500,000 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Prop 50, LTCFPP e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs TCPUD Board of Directors fully supports this project will be financed for the 25-year planning and will commit to cover all O&M through the period for project implementation (not grant annual water utility operating budget. funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if This project is critically important to solve the the project is not funded. (300 words or less) water delivery issues on the West Shore of Lake Tahoe.TCPUD will continue to pursue funding opportunities to ensure the project is completed. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation, Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 14 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/A Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage ctual Start al Project Date Completion Stage (mm/yr) Date(mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes Completed February March 2014 Evaluation F 2013 � No F N/A b. Final Design F Yes Design is currently January September F No underway 2016 2016 0 F N/A c. Environmental F Yes Completed October Documentation F 2015 (CEQA/NEPA) No F N/A d. Permitting F Yes Permitting is underway January December F F No with TRPA and US Forest 2016 2016 0 Service F N/A e. Construction F Yes TCPUD plans to call for February April 2016 Contracting F F No bids in December 2016 2016 0 F N/A f. Construction F Yes TCPUD plans to begin May 2017 June 2018 Implementation F F No construction in May 2017 0 F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 15 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed 2010 Urban Water Management project is consistent with or supported by(e.g.General Plan,Tahoe City Public Utility Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat District,amended October 18, Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) 2011 b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Preliminary Design Report feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much TCPUD contracted with Kennedy research has been conducted) of the proposed project in Jenks (KJ),to provide professional 300 words or less. engineering services related to the preparation of site selection and preliminary design for the new water treatment plant.To date, KJ has completed the Preliminary Design Report and assisted in the completion of the CEQA process. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. OF Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe LID techniques will be implemented.Also,TCPUD will utilize variable frequency drives on the pumps which will use less power and reduce energy e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management �F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? OF Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements OF Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No 0 F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No 0 F N/A 12/31/12)? Project Template Page 16 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No 0 F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No OF N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes F No QF N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Te Project Template Page 17 of 17 3/1/18 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Town of Truckee Name of Primary Contact Dan Olsen Name of Secondary Contact Deverie Acuff Mailing Address 10183 Truckee Airport Road,Truckee, CA 96161 E-mail dolsen@townoftruckee.com Phone (###)###-#### 530-582-2920 Other Cooperating Tahoe Resource Conservation District,Truckee River Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Watershed council,Truckee Donner Parks and Recreation District Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Aquatic Invasive Species/Watercraft Inspection Program Project Category: F Water Supply/Wastewater r Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control Water Supply/Wastewater Project Description Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) program within (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Truckee which includes a mandatory inspection program for words or less) motorized vessels, implementation of sticker program, education and outreach at key locations for non-motorized vehicles and recreational uses, partnerships with Tahoe Resource Conservation District and Truckee Donner Recreation and Parks District. The program is modeled after the program currently implemented in the Lake Tahoe basin Total number of projects 1 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes. Lake Tahoe AIS Coordination Committee and the Lake Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Tahoe Regional AIS Management Plan If so provide description. Political Support—List related MOUs, agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Longitude: Project Location Description (e.g., along the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/intersection and/or address): Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in W N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as F Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion F7 N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate F7 N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering F,71 N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of F%70 N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year F Yes planning horizon. F%70 N/A Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F7 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. Fv- N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. W N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for F7 N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural P1 N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The introduction or Measurement of bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes establishment of aquatic areas where associated uplands to support healthy r N/A invasive species is damaging species are watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife to the native environment. removed and and plant habitats. Established communities of restored with AIS can cause considerable native species. damage to water quality, water supply, recreation, and native species habitat and diversity which affects the economic and ecological health of the region and watershed. Prevention of the introduction and establishment of these species will help enhance and restore the watershed. Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2 - Develop and implement Prevention of the The number of programs to prevent the spread of Fy-' Yes introduction or boats existing invasive species and F N/A establishment of aquatic decontaminated colonization of potential future invasive species is damaging is measured. invasive species. to the native environment. Education and Established communities of outreach AIS can cause considerable programs damage to water quality, developed. water supply, recreation, and native species habitat and diversity which affects the economic and ecological health of the watershed ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, F Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. W N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional The implementation of the Inter-agency water-related planning activities R Yes AIS program requires the agreements and within the planning horizon as F N/A coordination with adjacent coordination. supported by current and future programs and agencies. watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The implementation of the Inter-agency multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes AIS program requires the agreements and Region for information exchange. r N/A coordination with adjacent coordination. programs and agencies. IWM3 - Increase public education and Project includes project Number of awareness of watershed functions, Fy-' Yes outreach and education outreach events, protection and restoration needs to r N/A effort including signs, publications encourage stewardship by the public. handout materials, and a distributed, boats watercraft inspection inspected. program Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes F71 N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. water quality,water supply, F Yes groundwater recharge,flood R N/A management) in local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r- N/A The Truckee River terminates in considerations. Pyramid Lake, located within the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Reservation. Prevention of aquatic species in the upper watershed will benefit the downstream community. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. P N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of P N/A climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are W N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F%70 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F%70 No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F- Yes FV- No System Reoperation F- Yes F%70 No Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water Transfers F_ Yes F%70 No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F_ Yes F%70 No Desalination F_ Yes F%-O No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F_ Yes F%70 No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F_ Yes F%70 No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F_ Yes F%-O No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F_ Yes F%-O No Matching Water Quality to Use F_ Yes F%70 No Pollution Prevention FV_ Yes F_ No Project prevents the introduction of invasive species which degrade water quality and benefits. Salt and Salinity Management F_ Yes F%70 No Urban Runoff Management F_ Yes F%-O No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes F%70 No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and FV_ Yes F No This program prevents the Water Pricing) establishment of AIS which has potential to degrade the environment, reducing the economic health of the community. Maintaining a healthy environment helps maintain a healthy tourist economy. Ecosystem Restoration r Yes F_ No This program prevents the establishment of AIS which has potential to degrade the environment, reducing the economic health of the community. Maintaining a healthy environment helps maintain a healthy tourist economy. Forest Management F_ Yes F%70 No Land Use Planning and Management F_ Yes F%-O No Recharge Areas Protection F_ Yes F%70 No Water-dependent Recreation F%O_ Yes F_ No This program prevents the establishment of AIS which has potential to degrade the environment, reducing the economic health of the community. Maintaining a healthy environment helps maintain a healthy Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? tourist economy. Watershed Management F Yes No This program prevents the establishment of AIS which has potential to degrade the environment, reducing the economic health of the community. Maintaining a healthy environment helps maintain a healthy tourist economy. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F Yes F7 No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and $45,000 $45,000 Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes F No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 Mandatory Inspection and certification of watercraft. Phase 2 Education and outreach material and signs. Phase 3 AIS eradication programs. Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project Some funding is $25,000 annually cost generated by the boat inspection and decontamination fees. d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding General Fund and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Maintenance will continue to be performed by Town will be financed for the 25-year planning of Truckee Public Works/Street Maintenance period for project implementation (not grant Division Staff(funded through local funds)for signs. funded). Continued implementation of the inspection program will be funded by the inspection and permit fees. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Existing program at Lake Tahoe. planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F- Yes F40 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Watercraft inspections would be suspended. the project is not funded. (300 words or less) Establishment of AIS in the area will degrade the environment and have a detrimental economic impact on the tourist based economy and surface water supply. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes Truckee Regional AID 10/28/2013 Evaluation XF F No Prevention Program AIS F N/A Vulnerability Study. b. Final Design F Yes F No N/A F N/A c. Environmental F_ Yes Documentation F F No (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A N/A d. Permitting F Yes F F No N/A F N/A e. Construction F Yes Installation of gate at 2019/2020 Contracting X F F No Donner Lake Public Boat Ramp. F N/A f. Construction F Yes Installation of gate at 2019/2020 Implementation F No Donner Lake Public Boat X Ramp. F N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee Regional AIS Prevention project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Program AIS Vulnerability Study, Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Town of Truckee Municipal Code Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Title 14 Aquatic Invasive Species. b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Truckee Regional AIS Prevention feasibility of this project Program AIS Vulnerability Study c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Water monitoring for AIS is research has been conducted) of the proposed project in conducted in Donner Lake one to 300 words or less. twice a year. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes F No F N/A N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No F N/A N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water SupplierZ: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No F N/A N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes No N/A N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee Donner Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Steven Poncelet Name of Secondary Contact Brian Wright Mailing Address 11570 Donner Pass Road E-mail stevenponcelet@tdpud.org Phone (###)###-#### (530)550-8951 Other Cooperating Truckee River Watershed Council,Town of Truckee, Nevada Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders County, Placer County, Placer County Water Agency, Northstar Community Services District Is your agency/organization Yes but this project is not currently budgeted and the timeline committed to the project through for funding depends on outside funding. completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Martis Valley Groundwater Basin Planning& Restoration Study Project Category XF Water Supply/Wastewater Restoration F-0 Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The Martis Valley aquifer is the main water supply for the (Briefly describe the project, in 300 greater Truckee region. The US Bureau of Reclamation words or less) recently completed the Truckee River Basin study which included a state-of-the-art groundwater model for the Martis Valley groundwater basing and watershed. This study has identified key recharge areas for the basin which will help plan for and protect key recharge areas that have or may be damaged by human activity. This project will provide the opportunity to: protect and improve water quality; project the community water supply; manage groundwater for sustainable yield; contribute to ecosystem restoration; provide a model for applying science to solve water problems. The opportunity exists to conduct a study using existing LIDAR and other GIS data (slope, soil errodability,vegetation, and backcountry road density)to identify opportunities to mitigate the negative impacts to water supply,water quality, and erosion in key impacted recharge areas. Known impacted areas include the large, football field sized landing pads from historic logging activities along with the myriad of logging,fire, and OHV dirt roads. Tahoe Sierra IRWM The ability to identify key aquifer recharge areas that have been damaged by human activity would enable Truckee Donner PUD, along with the other groundwater users in the Martis Valley, to better understand and plan for adequate water supply and quality. The benefits would be directly to the Martis Valley aquifer, Martis Creek, Martis Dam, and the Truckee River. One outcome would be a list of potential restoration or mitigation projects. The benefits would include increased water supply, improved water quality, reduced erosion, and reduced storm water. This would also allow for improved communication and collaboration with the land-owners, responsible agencies, developers, and the restoration/environmental community. The project scope would be to conduct the study and produce a final report documenting the findings and creating a prioritized list of potential projects. This study and list of projects would then be used to try and secure funding for the most important and beneficial projects. Total number of projects 4 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 4 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger This project would enable improved water supply and water Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? quality and would also enable reduced erosion and If so provide description. corresponding benefit to storm water. Any future projects could be mitigations against new development. Political Support—List related MOUs, Stewardship of the Martis Valley aquifer is currently jointly agreements or TACs currently in place. shared between Truckee Donner PUD, Northstar CSD, and Placer County Water Agency and the three water purveyors collaboratively adopted the Martis Valley Ground Water Management Plan (GMP) and associated MOU's. The State of California passed the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014 (SGMA) requires that the three water agencies also work with the Town of Truckee, Placer County, and Nevada County of a new regulatory framework to management of the Martis Valley Groundwater Basin. Project Location: ' Latitude: Various Longitude: Various Project Location Description (e.g., along The project area is the key recharge areas in the watershed the south bank of stream/river above the Maris Valley groundwater basin. The new between river miles or miles from recharge maps indicate that the key recharge areas around Towns/intersection and/or address): typically in the—500 foot elevation range and are centered mostly east and west of Highway 267 between Northstar and Brockway Summit. Project Template Page 2 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL Identifying impacted standards in accordance with the FV Yes recharge areas and future attainment date, and participate in r NSA restoration projects would the development of future TMDLs. improve recharge and reduce erosion. WQ2-Reduce pollutant loads by Again, identifying highly Potential existing implementing measures such as r Yes impacted/compacted areas to restore 100's storm water LID retrofits, erosion F_ NSA will reduce erosion and or 1000's of acres control/restoration to meet Water improve water quality of impacted Quality Objectives(WQOs)for recharge areas. receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate rv- N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water Again, identifying highly Potential existing supplied by public water systems r Yes impacted/compacted areas to restore 100's continues to meet Federal and State NSA will reduce erosion and or 1000's of acres standards. improve water quality. of impacted recharge areas. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, This study would focus Potential existing wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes mostly in upland areas where to restore 100's to re-establish natural water filtering r NSA the majority of the recharge or 1000's of acres processes. for the Maris Valley aquifer of impacted occurs. Again, identifying recharge areas. highly impacted/compacted areas will reduce erosion and improve water quality Project Template Page 3 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of W N/A wastewater. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet Projects identified in this The Martis Valley projected demands for a 20-year r Yes study would improve aquifer provides planning horizon. r N/A recharge for the aquifer almost 100%of resulting in increased water the region's supply water. WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or Projects identified in this Restoring and/or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes study would improve protecting key supply water. F N/A recharge for the aquifer recharge areas resulting in increased water could off-set supply future water infrastructure capital expenditures. WS3 - Implement and promote water Improving water supply and The completed conservation measures and practices FV Yes educating the public about study and to meet state goals. F N/A the need to conserve water subsequent are key State goals that restoration would be accomplished by projects would this study help educate the community about our watershed. GWM1- Maintain and monitor FV Yes This study will help protect Potential existing groundwater supply to assure future key recharge areas in the to restore 100's reliability. F N/A future and restore areas or 1000's of acres impacted by human activity. of impacted recharge areas. Project Template Page 4 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater YES. The ability to overlay Project scope protection activities for high quality F Yes past and planned would include at groundwater, and advocate for x development/human least one public improvements to impacted F NSA activities over key recharge meeting and groundwater quality through public areas will enable proper plan multiple education. and protection for stakeholder groundwater supply. The meetings. study and subsequent projects would be shared with stakeholders and the community to further public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for YES. The goal of the study is Potential existing multiple uses (e.g. r Yes to identify key recharge areas to restore 100's municipal/industrial/agricultural x for protection and to restore or 1000's of acres supply and environmental use). r NSA impacted areas. The primary of impacted goal would be improved recharge areas. water supply but there are significant benefits to ER1 - Enhance and restore water Addressing highly compacted Potential existing bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes logging landing pads and a to restore 100's associated uplands to support healthy F NSA substantial network of dirt or 1000's of acres watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife roads would improve of impacted and plant habitats. recharge, reduce erosion, recharge areas. improve water quality, and help storm water. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of Yes existing invasive species and F N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. Project Template Page 5 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with The key recharge areas for Potential existing public and private landowners, r Yes the Martis Valley are either to restore 100's activities to manage forest health and F N/A owned by private interested, or 1000's of acres wildfire risks. the Federal government, or of impacted the local Land Trust. Public- recharge areas. Private-NGO partnerships will be necessary to implement restoration projects. A side benefit or restoration activities would be improved forest health and reduced wildfire risk. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Wo Yes Overlaying key recharge caused by existing and new areas with planned development. r N/A developments will allow entitlement agencies to plan for and project key recharge areas. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional This study would combine a This planning tool water-related planning activities Yes state-of-the-art groundwater could be used by within the planning horizon as r N/A model with world-class multiple water supported by current and future LIDAR/GIS technology agencies, watershed science. entitlement agencies, and other interests. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The study/planning area is Numerous multiple jurisdictions within the Yes covered by two counties, one interagency Region for information exchange. N/A Town,three public water collaboration and agencies, State & Federal public-private agencies, private land partnerships exist owners, and environmental in the region and interests. The watershed is this study would also one of the major sources help foster more. of water supply for the State of Nevada. Project Template Page 6 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and There will be a strong Project scope awareness of watershed functions, r Yes community and educational would include at protection and restoration needs to F N/A outreach component to this least one public encourage stewardship by the public. project and the primary focus meeting and is 'How does the watershed multiple work and what impacts do stakeholder human activity have?' meetings. Understanding this may change people's behavior and would encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4- Promote activities that Improved recharge reduces reduce flood risk. W Yes storm water runoff and F N/A erosion both of which reduce flood risk. IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. The Truckee River Basin water quality,water supply, FV Yes Study projects climate groundwater recharge,flood N/A impacts to the Martis Valley management) in local and regional Groundwater basin through planning efforts and support efforts the end of the century. Part to continue improving the science. of this study would address how climate change might impact/change recharge areas. IWM6- Monitor water storage, All of the water in the Martis release and exchange activities in r Yes Valley Groundwater Basin order to improve coordination with r N/A (and in the Tahoe-Truckee regional planning. region) is governed by the Truckee River Operating Agreement (TROA)which is an agreement between two states and multiple stakeholders. Improving the understanding of aquifer recharge and human impacts will help overall coordination and regional planning since this is a shared resource. Project Template Page 7 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 8 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A One beneficiary of improved recharge considerations. in the Martis Valley is the Pyramid/Piute Tribe of Nevada which relies on Truckee River water for the environmental health of Pyramid Lake. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A X c. Environmental Justice'considerations. F- N/A X d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A See above. Improve recharge and climate change'. reduced environmental degradation will help the region adapt to climate change. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A Restoration projects tend to reduce emissions (e.g.green technology). greenhouse gas emissions or improve carbon sequestration. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A This could be a model for other not already mentioned elsewhere. groundwater basins/watersheds. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes FV- No No Urban Water Use Efficiency Yes 1%0 No No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local Yes F No I Yes, Improves overall watershed performance Project Template Page 9 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? System Reoperation V Yes No Potential to restore damaged recharge areas and improve overall watershed performance and System Reoperation. Water Transfers F Yes F No Increase Water Supply Im Conjunctive Management& Groundwater Yes F- No Improves recharge by reducing storm water and erosion. Desalination Yes F No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water r Yes Fv- No Surface Storage-- Regional/Local r Yes Fy-' No improveater Quality Drinking Water Treatment and Yes F%-O No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F No Study would identify restoration opportunities in key recharge area improving water supply, water quality, and reducing storm water/erosion. Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F No Pollution Prevention F Yes F No Reduced erosion would improve water quality in Martis Creek, Martis Dam, and the Truckee River. Salt and Salinity Management Yes P No Urban Runoff Management r Yes No Improved recharge and reduced erosion helps with Urban Runoff Management Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship Yes No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration Yes No Study would identify Ecosystem Restoration opportunities in key recharge area improving water supply, water quality, and reducing storm water/erosion. Forest Management Yes No Almost all of the key recharge areas for the Martis Valley are forested and the study would help with Forest Management Land Use Planning and Management ry-' Yes I— No This study would identify key recharge areas that have either been impacted by past human activity or which are planned to be developed or used in the future. Understanding this is Project Template Page 10 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? critical for Land Use Planning and Management Recharge Areas Protection Yes F No The central theme of this study is Recharge Area Projection Water-dependent Recreation Yes fV No Watershed Management Yes No This study would identify key recharge areas that have either been impacted by past human activity or which are planned to be developed or used in the future. Understanding this is critical for Watershed Management. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management 140 Yes No Improved recharge and reduced storm water/erosion helps with Flood Risk Management. Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 11 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $100,000 $25,000 $125,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F- Yes V No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding Martis Valley GMP $25,000 total and certainty of the sources for Project cost. Partners(TDPUD, NSCSD, PCWA) Rates e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs This is a Study. Future projects and funding would will be financed for the 25-year planning address this issue period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? Yes %0 No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Key recharge areas are currently not formally the project is not funded. (300 words or less) considered when evaluating watershed management, human activities, and future development. We know that some key recharge areas are already impacted by decades of logging and human activities and we are concerned that current and future planned growth/activities may further degrade the watershed performance as measured by recharge/water supply,water quality, erosion, and storm water. The United States Bureau of Reclamation,with support from the Martis Valley GMP partners, has spent over Project Template Page 12 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM $1,000,000 and counting to build the Martis Valley groundwater model and associated studies, including projections on the impacts of climate change. In addition,the Truckee Donner PUD, has state-of-the-art LIDAR/GIS systems that can identify things like slope%,vegetation,forest density,and road density. This study would combine/overlay this existing data, along with future growth/activities, on known key recharge areas to identify opportunities for restoration and to protect these areas in the future. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F- Yes Significant science has TBD TBD Evaluation XF F No X been completed to date and this study would F N/A combine this body of data/understanding to identify key aquifer recharge areas that could be restored or should be protected. b. Final Design F Yes Final output of this F F No project would be a x detailed report that F N/A would identify key recharge areas and produce a list of potential restoration projects along with an understand how future activities may impact aquifer recharge Project Template Page 13 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM and watershed performance. c. Environmental F Yes Would be done on a Documentation F F No project by project basis (CEQA/NEPA) that may result from this F N/A X study. d. Permitting F Yes Would be done on a F F No project by project basis that may result from this N/A X study. e. Construction F Yes Would be done on a Contracting F F No project by project basis that may result from this N/A X study. f. Construction F Yes Would be done on a Implementation F F No project by project basis that may result from this N/A X study. Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 14 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Town of Truckee, Placer County, and project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Nevada County General Plans, Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Martis Valley Ground Water Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Management Plan,Truckee Donner PUD UWMP and Water System Master Plan, California Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014 b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Integrated Surface and Groundwater feasibility of this project Modeling of Martis Valley, California, for Assessment of Potential Climate Change Impacts on Basin-Scale Water Resources; Desert Research Institute and U.S. Geological Survey; April, 2015 California GAMA Special Study:: Climate Change Impacts to Recharge in a High-Elevation Groundwater Basin; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, California State University—East Bay, University of California Santa Barbara; February, 2014 Note: There are half a dozen previous studies conducted on the Martis Valley groundwater basin and aquifer. Note: Truckee Donner PUD manages the GIS infrastructure for numerous agencies in the greater Truckee area including Town of Truckee,Truckee Tahoe Airport District,Truckee Sanitary District, Tahoe Truckee Sanitation Agency, and Northstar Community Services District. This includes LIDAR data with 2" inch resolution and sophisticated GIS that includes above and below grade Project Template Page 15 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM infrastructure, property lines, zoning, etc... This shared resource enables the overlaying of the key recharge areas with past and planned activities. c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much We know that some key recharge research has been conducted) of the proposed project in areas for the Martis Valley 300 words or less. groundwater basin are already impacted by decades of logging and human activities and we are concerned that current and future planned growth/activities may further degrade the watershed performance as measured by recharge/water supply,water quality, erosion, and storm water. The United States Bureau of Reclamation,with support from the Martis Valley GMP partners, has spent over$1,000,000 and counting to build the Martis Valley groundwater model and associated studies, including projections on the impacts of climate change. In addition,the Truckee Donner PUD, has state-of-the-art LIDAR/GIS systems that can identify things like slope%,vegetation, soil errodability, forest density, and road density. This study would combine/overlay this existing data, along with future growth/activities, on known key recharge areas to identify opportunities for restoration and to protect these areas in the future. All of the tools needed to complete this important work in the Martis Valley, due to the significant scientific studies over the last 5- years, exist today. This approach could also be a model for other watersheds/groundwater basins. Project Template Page 16 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. XF Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID — techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe The use of state-of-the art e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management XF Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? — 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? XF Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements XF Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) — 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due ❑Yes F No ❑ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior ❑Yes F No ❑ N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the XF Yes ❑ No F N/A subject basin? — 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes No N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 17 of 17 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee Donner Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Brian Wright,Water Superintendent Name of Secondary Contact Steven Poncelet, Public Information Officer Mailing Address 11570 Donner Pass Road,Truckee,CA 96161 E-mail brianwright@tdpud.org Phone(###E)###,#### (530)582-3957 Other Cooperating N/A Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes,the TDPUD is committed to completing the project but the committed to the project through timeline for completion is dependent upon availability of completion?If not, please explain funding H. General Project Information _Project Title Potable Groundwater Well Discharge Collectors Project Category riWaterSupply/Wastewater Restoration r Storm Water/Flood control Project Description this project will include the construction and procurement (Briefly describe the project, in 300 of structures and appurtenances to discharge and convey words or less) potable water to percolation and settling basins at twelve (12)TDPUD owned well facilities. American Water Works Association (AWWA) Best Management Practices(BMPs), as well as SWRCB and EPA drinking water standards advocate suppliers of public drinking water flush/discharge upon initial start-up of groundwater wells to prevent the potential introduction of bacteriological contaminants into the potable water distribution system. This project will facilitate the on- site collection and percolation of discharged water, enhancing source water quality to the distribution system, eliminating the impact on storm water collection infrastructure and implementing groundwater infiltration/recharge as a beneficial use of planned drinking water discharges. Total number of projects 4 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger This project enhances the District's ability to satisfy BMP's as Project le.g.,TMDL, EIP,Phase 2 of 3)? outlined in compliance measures associated with the SWRCB If so provide description. _ General NPDES for Drinking Wate.r Discharges Political Support—List related MOUs, agreements or TAGS currently in place. Project Location: _ Latitude: Multiple locations (coordinates available upon request] Tahoe Sierra IRWM Longitude: Multiple locations(coordinates available upon request) Project Location Description(e.g.,along the south bank of stream/river between river miles or miles from Towns/Intersection and/or address): III. Plan objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft 1RWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e-g.acres Of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date,and participate in r NIA the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Well discharge settlement drinking water implementing measures such as r Yes and percolation basins will discharges as a storm water LID retrofits,erosion F N/A mitigate erosions associated function of control/restoration to meet Water with drinking water maintenance and Quality Objectives (WQOs)for discharges from groundwater operation receiving water bodies established in wells during maintenance equating to the Basin Plan within the planning and operations approximately horizon, 25,000-100,000 gallons per day (12 wells) WQ3 -Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate f iV/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4-Ensure that drinking water Enhance the TDPUD's ability Total supplied by public water systems C++ Yes to deliver drinking water in groundwater well continues to meet Federal and State �— NIA accordance with SWRCB, CA- production standards. EPA, USEPA,and AWWA capacity is standards, by significantly approximately reducing public exposure 9,500 gpm water quality risks Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ5-Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas r Yes to re-establish natural water filtering F_ N/A processes. WQG-Operate and maintain, build, or Project includes the Eleven Potable replace infrastructure for reliable Yes construction of infrastructure Groundwater collection, treatment and disposal of f- NIA for the reliable collection and Well Facilities wastewater. disposal of groundwater well discharges WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands fora 2.0-year r Yes planning horizon, r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or Project includes the 11 Well Facilities replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes construction of infrastructure supply water. r N/A to ensure water quality and enhance water supply reliability WS3- Implement and promote water Collection of discharged well 25,000-100,000 conservation measures and practices r Yes water will ensure water is gallons per day to meet state goals. r NIA recharged to the local aquifer as opposed to conveyance to storm water collection system GWM1-Maintain and monitor r Yes Collection of discharged well 25,000-100,000 groundwater supply to assure future water will ensure water is gallons per day reliability. r N/A recharged to the local aquifer as opposed to conveyance to storm water collection system I GWM2 -Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for r N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. Project Template Page 3 of 12 Tahoe Sierra 11RUVIAR Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected objective le.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced GWM3 -Manage groundwater for Collection of discharged well 25,000-100,000 multiple uses(e.g. W Yes water will ensure water is gallons per day municipal/industrial/agricultural F_ N/A recharged to the local aquifer supply and environmental use). as opposed to conveyance to storm water collection system FR1 - Enhance and restore water J bodies, wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. ER2- Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and �.. N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3- Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. E94- Minimize ecosystem impacts Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1-Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes Region for information exchange. r N/A lWM3 - Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, r yes protection and restoration needs to r N/A encourage stewardship by the public. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored Dr enhanced) IWIV14- promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes r N/A IWM5-Address climate change(e.g. Collection of discharged well 25,000-100,000 water quality,water supply, r Yes water will ensure water is gallons per day groundwater recharge, flood F N/A recharged to the local aquifer management) in local and regional as opposed to conveyance to planning efforts and support efforts storm water collection to continue improving the science. systems IWIV16- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with 1.. N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed;describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/21/13 Tahoe Sierra iR1NM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. if applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice 2 considerations. r N/A d. Assist the Region In adapting to effects of r' N/A climate change'. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r• N/A emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. I.A Disadvantaged community Is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 90 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instructian for reference. 2.Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of ali races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and polirles. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)In an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as Increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Platt here- htti)://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwou2OO9/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be Incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Roduce Water Demand - -- Agricultural Water Use Efficiency r yes r mo Cuban Water Use Efficiency Yes r No — Improve Operational Efficiency and TransfersT Conveyance- Regional/local r Yes r No System Reoperation r Yes r No Water Transfers r Yes r No Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RIVIS? Increase Water Supply M&E V I Conjunctive Management&Groundwater r Yes No Desalination r Yes r" No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water Yes r No Surface Storage-- Regional/Local F Yes r No Improve Water Quality } Drinking Water Treatment and Iv Yes F No Reduce potential public health risks Distribution associated with water supply and distribution infrastructure failures, maintain a more reliable water _ treatment and distribution system Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation rr, Yes r- No Matching Water Quality to Use r yes r- No Pollution Prevention r Yes r No Salt and Salinity Management r yes r No Urban Runoff Management r" yes r- No Practice Resources Stewardship_ _ Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes r- Fconomic Incentives(Loans, Grants, and F Yes f No Water Pricing) Fcosystem Restoration r- Yes f No Forest Management r Yes r No Land Use Planning and Management r Yes r No Recharge Areas Protection r Yes r No Water-dependent Recreation r Yes r No Watershed Management r- Yes f No Improve Flood Management _ - - _ Flood Risk Management r Yes r No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the Ilst.Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost,sources of funding, and operation and maintenance casts, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source _ Funding Match_) 1. Capital(2013 Dollars) $600,000 $120,000 $720,000 OR r DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) NOR- b.Can the Project be phased? 1✓ Yes - - r No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase _breakdown by phases) Phase 1 $240,000 N/A Planning,bidding, procurement,and construction at four(4) facilities Phase 2 $240,000 N/A Planning, bidding, procurement,and construction at four(4) facilities Phase 3 $240,000 N/A Planning, bidding, procurement, and construction at four(4) facilities Phase 4 Sou rce(s) Amount c.List secured source(s)of funding for Project TDPUD Water $120,000 cost General Fund d,List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Operation and Maintenance Costs are minimal and will be financed for the 25-year planning would be incorporated into groundwater well period for project implementation (not grant facility maintenance budgets funded). _ f. Basis for project costs (e.g. conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? F_ yes P No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Project will either not be completed or experience the project is not funded. (300 words or less) significant delays, requiring alternative and less- effective measures for maintaining source water quality 1, For the grain applicatlon a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories per the IRWM P5P for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Wrect Project Administration,Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Acts Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date Imm/yr) Stage (mm/yd a. Assessment and r Yes Assessment and January/ July/2016 Evaluation IL r. No evaluation of discharge 2016 volumes, percolation F N/A tests,site layout b. Final Design F Yes Final design and layout of TBD TBD r F No piping and discharge collection infrastructure F N/A c. Environmental F Yes N/A N/A N/A Documentation F F No (CEQA/NEPA) r n►IA d Permitting - F- Yes TBD TBD TBD CR F No F N/A e. Construction r Yes Significant portion of TBD TBD Contracting I F No Construction and installation of F N/A infrastructure to be completed by TDPUD labor f. Construction F Yes Installation of water pipe TBD TBD Implementation I-- r No and discharge collection infrastructure r N/A Project Template Page 10 of 12 22/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 11 of 12 1Z/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vlll. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents(date, title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed SWRCB General NPDES for Drinking project is consistent with or supported by(e.g.General Water Discharges Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water iVlaster Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs,Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g, how much research has been conducted)of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. r Yes No N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques,etc.) J.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management yes r No r N/A Plan and submitted to DWit? 2.Are you in compliance with AB14207 Yes r No r N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements Fly-es F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes r No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due r Yes rl No n N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes r No r N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project Is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the yes 7 No r N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the Yes r No r N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually, 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWNi Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee Donner Public Utility District Name of Primary Contact Brian Wright Name of Secondary Contact Steven Poncelet Mailing Address 11570 Donner Pass Road E-mail brianwright@tdpud.org Phone(###)###-#### (530) 582-3957 -- - other Cooperating Agencies/organizations/Stakeholders is your agency/organization The Truckee Donner Public Utility District has committed to committed to the project through and budgeted an annual Water Main Replacement project for completion? If not, please explain 2016-2017, but additional funding will allow the District to increase the size and scope of the project,expediting the replacement of high priority water main replacements Il. General Project Information Project Title Wa er Pipeline Replacement Project Project Category , Water Supply/Wastewater f Restoration r Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The Truckee Donner Public Utility District's potable water (Briefly describe the project,in 300 distribution system is includes just over 200 miles of water words or less) pipeline, varying in size and material, and with installation dates going as far back as the 1940s. Each year,TDPUD water utility maintenance staff repairs, on average, 70-100 water main leaks that occur due to aged and degraded water main pipes. The TDPUD has budgeted water main replacement projects for FY16-17, with a priority placed on water pipelines that require replacement due age and/or previous history of leaks. Additional funding would expedite the replacement of additional sections of water main pipeline that have been identified as priority replacements. Expedited water main replacements would aid in significantly reducing the District's unaccounted for water, ensure a more reliable water distribution System and serve as a preventative measure for potential water pipeline _ failures in the future. Total number of projects 4 Project Prioritization; submitted by your Agency; Agency Prioritization of this 4 project(e.g., 3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger TDPUD Water Master Plan Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3)? If so provide description. Political Support—List related MOLis, Tahoe Sierra IRWM agreements or TACs currently in place. Project Location: Latitude: Longitude: _ Project Location Description (e.g.,along Project involves the replacement of various sections of aged the south bank of stream/river water pipeline infrastructure and will be located throughout between river miles or miles from the TDPUD potable water distribution system. Specific Towns/intersection and/or address): locations of the pipeline replacement project may identified based upon the tinning of potential funding. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e,g-acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 -Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by - implementing measures such as r Yes storm water LID retrofits, erosion r N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives(WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3-Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.c.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4-Ensure that drinking water Replacement of aged water Currently average supplied by public water systems FV- Yes pipeline infrastructure shall 70-100 water continues to meet Federal and State 17- NSA contribute to enhanced main leaks each standards. water qualities, consistent year, some of delivery pressures, which result in dependable fire flows,and interruption of reduced occurrences of service, short unplanned discharges term degradation of water quality and unplanned discharges WQ5- Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas f Yes to reestablish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable r Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WSI- Provide water supply to meet Replacement of aged water Currently average projected demands for a 20-year r Yes pipeline infrastructure shall 70-100 water planning horizon, j--. N/A contribute to enhanced main leaks each water qualities,consistent year,some of delivery pressures, which result in dependable fire flows, and interruption of reduced occurrences of service,short unplanned discharges term degradation of water quality and unplanned discharges Project Template Page 3 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g,acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or Replacement of aged water Currently average replace Infrastructure to reliably r Yes pipeline infrastructure shall 7D-100 water supply water. F N/A contribute to enhanced main leaks each water qualities, consistent year,some of delivery pressures, which result in dependable fire flows, and interruption of reduced occurrences of service, short unplanned discharges term degradation of water quality and unplanned discharges W53 - Implement and promote water Replacement of aged water Currently average conservation measures and practices P- Yes pipeline infrastructure shall 70-100 water to meet state goals. F N/A contribute to significant main leaks each reductions in unaccounted year for water(leaks). GWM1-Maintain and monitor _ I to assure future i Yes groundwater supply reliability. F NIA GWM2-Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 -Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. I— Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural f— NIA supply and environmental use). ER1- Enhance and restore water bodies, wetlands, riparian areas and �- yes associated uplands to support healthy r- N/A watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife and plant habitats. Project Template Page 4 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres at objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER2-Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of F yes existing invasive species and r N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3-Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and N/A wildfire risks. ER4-Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. F N/A IWM1.-Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities r yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2- Ensure collaboration among multiple jurisdictions within the F yos Region for information exchange. F N/A IWM3- Increase public education and awareness of watershed functions, r Yes protection and restoration needs to F N/A encourage stewardship by the public. IWM4-Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes r N/A IWMS -Address climate change(e.g. water quality,water supply, r Yes groundwater recharge, flood j•' N/A management) In local and regional planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. Project Template Page 5 of 13 Z/71/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective {e,g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM6-Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in r Yes order to improve coordination with f NSA regional planning, If no objectives are addressed;describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRVVM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. {dative American Tribal Community N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations, l" N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of I- N/A climate change3. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r' N/A emissions(e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. L A Disadvantaged Community Is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2.Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,Implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefitwould be to Improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to Include Increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies(RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca,gov/cwpu2Of]9lindE!x.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RM5? Redow Water Demand _ Agricultural Water Use Ffficiency F Yes r No Urban Water Use Efficiency F yes r No Im rnup a Operational Efficiency and Transfers --- - Conveyance- RegionaI/ local r Yes r No System Reoperation r Yes r No Water Transfers r yes r No Project Template Page 7 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe ,Sierra HRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RM5 to be incorporate employed If applicable RIVIS? Increase Water Supply_ __ - — - A Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes r No Desalination r Yes r No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water r Yes I— No Surface Storage --Regional/Local F Yes r No Improve Water quality,. Drinking Water Treatment and ry Yes F No Reduce potential public health risks Distribution associated with distribution infrastructure failures, maintain a more reliable water supply and distribution system Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes I" No Matching Water Quality to Use r yes r No Pollution Prevention r Yes No Salt and Salinity Management r Yes r No Urban Runoff Management r Yes r No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes r No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and r- yes r No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration Yes r No Forest Management Yes r No Land Use Planning and Management r Yes T` No Recharge Areas Protection f— Yes r No Water-dependent Recreation r Yes r No Watershed Management r Yes F No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management r Yes r No Note:The following RM5 have been omitted from the list;Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CAVED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 9 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWIVII V. project Cost and Financing -Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs,as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs � Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source _ Funding Match) 1., Capital (2013 Dollars) $1,000,000 $1,250,000 $2,250,000 OR r DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O& )= M) b.Can the Project be phased? rVI Yes r No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $250,000 N/A 1st year-approximately 1,000ft of water main replacement Phase 2 $250,000 N/A Sst year-approximately 1,000ft of water main _ replacement Phase 3 $250,000 N/A 1st year-approximately 1,000ft of water main replacement Phase 4 $250,000 N/A 15t year-approximately 1,000ft of water main replacement Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s)of funding for Project TDPUD Water $1,250,000 to$1,500,000 cast Operating Reserve annually _ _ Fund d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding N/A N/A and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs Revenue collected from TDPUD water rates are the will be financed for the 25-year planning funding source for the operation and maintenance period for project implementation (not grant of water distribution system pipelines and funded). associated infrastructure and is included in the Board approved Water Utility Operation and Maintenance Budgets. _ f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Projected construction costs are based on publicly planning, bid, etc.) bid and previously completed water main replacement projects of similar size and scope g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes fv No h,Please describe what impact there may be if Reduction in the size and scope of the TDPUD's the project is not funded. (300 words or less) annual water main replacement projects,and subsequent delays in the replacement of aged pipeline infrastructure Project Template Page 10 of 13 12111/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the fallowing cost categories;per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,implementatlon Grants:Direct Project Administration,land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitlgatlon/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and construction/implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule -Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check Completed? Description of Planned/Attu planned/Attu the Activities in Each al Start Date al Completion Current Project Stage (mm/yr) Date(mm/yr) Project Stage a. Assessment and rp Yes Assess and prioritize Significantly Significantly l-valuation r F-1 No water distribution complete complete pipelines for n N/A replacement based upon age and/or leak history h. Final Design r Yes TDPUD Water Systems Significantly Final design r r No Engineer design and complete details will draft of Annual Pipeline be F N/A Replacement Projects completed for each phase at the start of each calendar year c. Environmental j" yes Categorically Exempt N/A N/A Documentation F No (CEQA/NEPA) F_ N/A d Permitting F yes Complete requisite January of February of r r No permitting with local each year each year jurisdictions(Nevada N/A County, Placer County, Town of Truckee, etc.) at the beginning of each calendar year e. Construction F Yes Publicly advertised February of March of Contracting I F No request for bids;Award each year each year of Board approved r N/A contract f. Construction f"Yes Begin Construction of May of each September of Implementation F No Pipeline project year each year Project Template Page 11 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM f1 17 N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 12 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vlll. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents(date, title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed TDPUD Water Utility Master Plan project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Plans, UWMPs, GWIVIPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the feasibility of this project c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much research has been conducted)of the proposed project in 300 words or less. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F 1 Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques,etc.) I.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management r�Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AR1420? Dyes F No F_ N/A — 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements FF,yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", l 1 Yes F No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier=: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due r,Yes r No F_ N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior (-j Yes F No 7 N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary; g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the r,Yes F No r N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the Yes f No r N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. Z,Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing waterto 10,000 or more Irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 13 of 13 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Lisa Wallace Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568 Truckee, CA 96162 E-mail Iwallace@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### 530-550-8760 Other Cooperating Town of Truckee, Nevada County, Sierra County,Tahoe Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Resource Conservation District,Truckee Donner Recreation and Park District, California Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, US Department of Agriculture, USFS,Truckee Donner Land Trust. Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) Prevention- Middle Truckee River Watershed Project Category X Water Supply/Waste Water F_ Restoration F_ Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description The Truckee River watershed is at risk of aquatic invasive (Briefly describe the project, in 300 species (AIS) introduction and establishment through the words or less) threat of advancing nearby infested water bodies.The goal of this program is to prevent the introduction of AIS species and prevent the spread of established populations in the Middle Truckee River watershed. Objectives for this program are to implement mandatory inspection programs at all water bodies in the Middle Truckee River watershed. Strategies to meet this objective include supporting agencies to implement, refine and sustain mandatory inspection programs. Action steps will include facilitating inter-agency partnerships, cohesive programming, understanding available resources and learning from program successes and challenges. We will facilitate regional coordination meetings to complete these action steps. We will also compile monitoring results to identify risk to water bodies. Watershed benefits include improved water quality and protection of instream habitat. Total number of projects [14 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Tahoe Sierra IRWM Agency Prioritization of this 14 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes, Lahontan Basin Plan identifies AIS prevention as a Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? strategy to protect water quality and habitat in the Truckee If so provide description. River watershed. Political Support—List related MOUs, There is an active TAC for this program (see Cooperating agreements or TACs currently in place. I Agencies) Project Location: Latitude: 39.32240 Longitude: -120.2663107 Project Location Description (e.g.,along Project is located in the Middle Truckee River watershed the south bank of stream/river which includes a 35-mile stretch of the river that runs between river miles or miles from northeast from Tahoe City to the California/Nevada state Towns/intersection and/or address): line, and all the tributaries that feed into this stretch of the river. The project focuses on lakes and reservoirs in the watershed including Donner Lake and Prosser, Boca and Stampede Reservoirs. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification (e.g.acres of address the linkage to selected Objective streams/wetlands restored or objective? enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2— Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through r Yes planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification (e.g.acres of address the linkage to selected Objective streams/wetlands restored or Objective? enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems r Yes continues to meet Federal and State r N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. WS1- Provide water supply to meet Aquatic invasive species Mandatory watercraft projected demands for a 20-year I7 Yes could potentially affect water inspections at Donner planning horizon. r N/A supply if populations become Lake, Boca, Stampede and large. Inspections prevent Prosser Reservoirs. introductions. WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably F Yes supply water. F7 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices F Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F_ Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality r Yes groundwater, and advocate for F N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. Project Template Page 3 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification (e.g.acres of address the linkage to selected Objective streams/wetlands restored or Objective? enhanced) GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. r Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water This project will protect Mandatory watercraft bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and r Yes water bodies by preventing inspections at Donner associated uplands to support healthy r N/A the introduction and/or Lake, Boca, Stampede and watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife spread of AIS. Prosser Reservoirs. and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement This project will prevent the #of boats inspected at programs to prevent the spread of F40 Yes introduction and spread of Donner Lake.#of self- existing invasive species and r N/A AIS by supporting mandatory inspection reports at colonization of potential future watercraft inspections in the Boca,Stampede and invasive species. Middle Truckee River Prosser Reservoirs.#of watershed. decontaminations. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, F_ Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F_ Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional Program activities focus on Research updates at AIS water-related planning activities P Yes AIS research through Coordination Meeting. within the planning horizon as r N/A University of Nevada Reno on supported by current and future Lake Tahoe and Donner Lake. watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among Town of Truckee, Nevada Participation in Regional multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes County, Sierra County,Tahoe AIS Coordination Meeting. Region for information exchange. r N/A Resource Conservation District,Truckee Donner Recreation and Park District, California Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, US Department of Agriculture, USFS,Truckee Donner Land Trust. Project Template Page 4 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification (e.g.acres of address the linkage to selected Objective streams/wetlands restored or Objective? enhanced) IWM3 - Increase public education and Information on mandatory Brochures/Information awareness of watershed functions, F40 Yes inspections will be distributed. protection and restoration needs to r N/A distributed. Public encourage stewardship by the public. participation will be encouraged through clean, drain and dry messaging. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes W N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Coordination meetings will Risk assessment report. water quality,water supply, Fv Yes include updates on scientific groundwater recharge,flood r N/A research, monitoring and risk management) in local and regional assessment of AIS planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in F Yes order to improve coordination with r N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 5 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Program will increase watershed climate change'. resiliency. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A Aquatic invasive species adversely not already mentioned elsewhere. impact water recreation, a large part of the economy of the region. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F470 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F7 Yes F- No Aquatic invasive species could impact water supply if populations become large. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/local Yes P No System Reoperation F- Yes F470 No Water Transfers F- Yes F7 No Project Template Page 6 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management&Groundwater F Yes FV_ No Desalination F Yes IV No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes F No Surface Storage -- Regional/ Local F Yes F No Improve Water Quality nommor- Drinking Water Treatment and r Yes F_ No Aquatic invasive species could affect Distribution water treatment systems. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes 1y-1 No Pollution Prevention r Yes Fv_0 No Salt and Salinity Management F Yes Fv_0 No Urban Runoff Management F Yes FY-1 No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F_ Yes Fv0_ No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes F No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration P Yes F_ No Project will protect and improve instream and riparian habitat. Forest Management F_ Yes F4_0 No Land Use Planning and Management Fy-' Yes F_ No Management actions to prevent the spread of AIS are included in the project. Recharge Areas Protection F Yes Fy-' No Water-dependent Recreation r Yes F_ No AIS prevention will protect water bodies from AIS introduction. Water bodies are at risk for closure if AIS is introduced and/or expands. Watershed Management r Yes F No Preventing the spread of AIS through watershed management preserves ecosystem function. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management F_ Yes Fy-' No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 7 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 8 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as,the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $30,000 $ $30,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? F Yes F- No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $10,000 Annual cost to implement program—assume 3 year grant Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s)of funding for Project cost d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs will be financed for the 25-year planning period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Experience managing the project in prior years. planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? r Yes F- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if Mandatory inspections at all water bodies will not the project is not funded. (300 words or less) happen exposing the region to added risk of AIS introduction. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. Project Template Page 9 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and F Yes Project plan is based on Evaluation X F No assessment of work F N/A completed in prior years. b. Final Design F Yes F F No r N/A c. Environmental F Yes Documentation F F No (CEQA/NEPA) r N/A d. Permitting F Yes F F No r N/A e. Construction F Yes Contracting F F No r N/A f. Construction F Yes Implementation F F No R_ N/A Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 10 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Watershed Coordinated Watershed Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Management Strategy(TRWC, 2014) Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Implementing invasive species feasibility of this project control: a case study of multi- jurisdictional coordination at Lake Tahoe, USA (http://www.reabic.net/iournals/mb i/2015/4/MBI 2015 Wittmann etal. pdf) Lake Tahoe AIS Management Plan (TRPA, 2014) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Regional studies have been research has been conducted) of the proposed project in completed supporting the need and 300 words or less. strategies associated with the proposed program. These studies include: Truckee Regional Aquatic Invasive Species Program (TRAISPP): 1. 2012 TRAISPP Annual Report (TRCD, 2012) 2. 2013 TRAISPP Annual Report 3. TRAISPP Vulnerability Assessment(TRCD, 2013) 4. Inventory of Aquatic Invasive Species and Water Quality in Lakes in the Lower Truckee River Region (2010- 2013) (UNR, 2014) d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. 17- Yes Fv- No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? Project Template Page 11 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is"no", F Yes F No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier 2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Has a GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No F N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 12 of 12 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Truckee River Watershed Council Name of Primary Contact Beth Christman Name of Secondary Contact Lisa Wallace Mailing Address P.O. Box 8568 E-mail bchristman@truckeeriverwc.org Phone (###)###-#### (530)550-8760 Other Cooperating Trout Unlimited, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders California Department of Water Resources Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Truckee River Operating Agreement— Instream flow enhancement Project Category XF Water Supply/Wastewater Restoration Storm Water/Flood Control Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Description The goal of the Truckee River Operating Agreement (TROA) (Briefly describe the project, in 300 flow enhancement project is to improve instream flows in words or less) the Truckee River watershed in California to benefit fish and wildlife resources while meeting water supply needs. This goal will be met through the following objectives: -conduct habitat availability studies at different flow targets to provide input for California Guidelines to more accurately protect aquatic resources in California -participate in TROA coordination meetings to support California in negotiations with other TROA parties -convene local stakeholder interests through monthly meetings of the Truckee River Basin Water Group TROA is the operations decision-making framework in the Truckee River Basin. California is represented in the negotiations by the CA Department of Water Resources, who are responsible for reflecting all interests in California. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) is tasked with providing input to the California Department of Water Resources to protect biological resources under TROA.At present, DFW is severely resource limited to provide input that will protect fish, wildlife, and habitat. This project will provide resources needed for California to have accurate information for resource protection. Total number of projects 14 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 11 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger Yes—Truckee River Sediment TMDL(LRWQCB, 2008), Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? Lahontan Basin Plan,Truckee River Coordinated Watershed If so provide description. Management Strategy(TRWC, 2014),Truckee River Operating Agreement Political Support—List related MOUs, California interests in the Truckee River meet monthly as the agreements or TACs currently in place. Truckee River Basin Water Group. The Nevada County Supervisor serves as the chairperson. Project Location: Latitude: 39.32778 Longitude: -120.17830 Project Location Description (e.g.,along The project will affect flows on the mainstem of the Truckee the south bank of stream/river River in California, Donner Creek, Prosser Creek, between river miles or miles from Independence Creek, and the Little Truckee River above and Towns/intersection and/or address): below Stampede Reservoir. III. Plan Objectives Addressed Project Template Page 2 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the r Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by Extremely high flows and Flows improved implementing measures such as r Yes rapid changes in flow rates on 6 stream stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A can cause erosion, leading to reaches. control/restoration to meet Water excess sedimentation. This Quality Objectives(WQOs)for project will provide guidance receiving water bodies established in on appropriate flows to the Basin Plan within the planning minimize ecosystem risk horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality Temperature data will be Temperature monitoring programs through W Yes collected to determine at maintained above planning horizon, and coordinate r N/A what flow rates thermal critical thresholds annually throughout the Region. pollution is occurring.The on 6 stream data will be used to reaches. recommend minimum flow targets. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State I� N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F Yes to re-establish natural water filtering r N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F Yes collection,treatment and disposal of r N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 3 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1- Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. r N/A WS2-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably r Yes supply water. F7 N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices r Yes to meet state goals. r N/A GWM1- Maintain and monitor F- Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A GWM2 - Promote groundwater TROA includes provisions for Coordination protection activities for high quality r Yes reporting groundwater use. between local groundwater, and advocate for r N/A Through this project we will entities and DWR improvements to impacted improve coordination among during monthly groundwater quality through public local stakeholders TRBWG meetings. education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural r N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water The project will provide Flows improved bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F7 Yes recommendations for flows on 6 stream associated uplands to support healthy r N/A to protect critical life stages reaches. watersheds,viable native fish,wildlife of fish and recommendations and plant habitats. for maintaining and restoring riparian habitat. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of r Yes existing invasive species and F%O- N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. Project Template Page 4 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with public and private landowners, r Yes activities to manage forest health and r N/A wildfire risks. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts Fy-' Yes caused by existing and new development. F N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional This project will improve the Effective monthly water-related planning activities r Yes effectiveness of California for TRBWG meetings. within the planning horizon as r N/A negotiations for instream supported by current and future water rights with watershed science. downstream water users. We will coordinate across California interests to develop coordinated requests. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among This project will improve the Effective monthly multiple jurisdictions within the r Yes effectiveness of California for TRBWG meetings. Region for information exchange. F N/A negotiations for instream water rights with downstream water users. We will coordinate across California interests to develop coordinated requests. IWM3 - Increase public education and The TRBWG provides Effective monthly awareness of watershed functions, Fv Yes information and education TRBWG meetings. protection and restoration needs to r N/A for local entities on water- encourage stewardship by the public. related issues. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes F N/A Project Template Page 5 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Improving instream flows will Flows improved water quality,water supply, r Yes be critical as the regional on 6 stream groundwater recharge,flood r NSA hydrology shifts due to reaches. management) in local and regional climate change. planning efforts and support efforts to continue improving the science. IWM6- Monitor water storage, This project will provide Engagement in release and exchange activities in W Yes capacity for California to monthly TROA order to improve coordination with r NSA monitor water exchanges in scheduling regional planning. the Truckee River system meetings. through participation in monthly TROA scheduling meetings hosted by the federal watermaster. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community P N/A considerations. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. r N/A c. Environmental Justice'considerations. P1 N/A d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r N/A Project will improve instream flows. climate change'. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas r N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes F7 No Urban Water Use Efficiency Yes F7 No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance- Regional/ local F7 Yes F- No The project provides data to improve instream flows while maintaining water conveyance. System Reoperation r Yes F7 No Water Transfers R Yes F- No The project provides data for California to work for more Project Template Page 7 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? environmentally beneficial water transfers. Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater 1740 Yes F No The project improves coordination for groundwater use reporting. Desalination F Yes F No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes 1740 No Surface Storage -- Regional/Local F Yes W No Improve Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and f- Yes F407 No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation r Yes FV_ No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes FV_ No Pollution Prevention R Yes F_ No The project will collect data on thermal pollution and make recommendations to avoid thermal thresholds. Salt and Salinity Management F Yes WO No Urban Runoff Management r Yes N-0 No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship r Yes FV_ No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Yes W No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F7 Yes F No Forest Management F Yes 77 No Land Use Planning and Management r Yes 40 No Recharge Areas Protection r Yes P No Water-dependent Recreation Yes No The project includes coordination among watershed interests including rafting, boating, and fishing communities. Watershed Management Yes No The project provides recommendations to improve instream flows for ecosystem health. Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management f- Yes F%0_ No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 9 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $360,000 $27,000 $387,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) b.Can the Project be phased? Fy' Yes i No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $129,000 Year one TROA participation Phase 2 $129,000 Year two TROA participation Phase 3 $129,000 Year three TROA participation Phase 4 Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project In-kind contributions $27,000 cost from stakeholders d.List proposed source(s)of unsecured funding and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs TROA went into effect in December, 2015. The first will be financed for the 25-year planning several years of TROA will be the most challenging period for project implementation (not grant as California learns how to most effectively make funded). scheduling requests. Therefore involvement during this time period is most critical. Funding requirements after this initial period will be substantially reduced. TRWC's continued involvement will be met through grants and private contribution income. f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Estimate for data collection, known costs for TRWC planning, bid, etc.) staff time. g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? f Yes ,v No h.Please describe what impact there may be if There will not be sufficient resources available to the project is not funded. (300 words or less) protect California's fish and wildlife resources under TROA operations. This project will allow California to better optimize environmental protection while water supply requirements are met. Project Template Page 10 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and r Yes Evaluation F F No F N/A b. Final Design r Yes F F No F N/A c. Environmental W Yes Documentation F F No (CEQA/NEPA) F N/A d. Permitting r Yes F F No F N/A e. Construction F Yes Contracting F F No r N/A f. Construction F Yes TROA went into effect 1/1/2019 1/1/2022 Implementation X December 1, 2015. We X NO are ready to implement F N/A our project as soon as funding is available. Project Template Page 11 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more than one project stage is checked as current status Project Template Page 12 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Truckee River Operating Agreement project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General (2008), Truckee River Sediment Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat TMDL(LRWQCB, 2008), Lahontan Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Basin Plan,Truckee River Coordinated Watershed Management Strategy (TRWC, 2014) b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Truckee River Operating Agreement feasibility of this project (2008),Truckee River Operating Agreement EIS/EIR (USDO1, 2008), Instream Flow Requirements Truckee River Basin (DFW, 1996), Truckee River Riverware model (CADSWES) c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much The TROA report and EIS/EIR contain research has been conducted) of the proposed project in technical details on river operations. 300 words or less. The DFW Instream Flow study sets flow targets for TROA-affected river reaches in the Truckee River Basin. TROA operations are scheduled and implemented using the Riverware computer model. The Truckee River Riverware model has been under development and tested for the past 5 years through a series of"Mock TROA" exercises. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. F Yes F No F N/A alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID x techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management F Yes F No F N/A Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? F Yes F No F N/A 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements F Yes F No F N/A (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", F Yes F No F N/A do you intend to comply prior to receiving project Project Template Page 13 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due F Yes F No F N/A 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior F Yes F No F N/A to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the F Yes F No F N/A subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the F Yes r No r N/A grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 14 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California—Washoe Environmental Protection Department (WEPD) Name of Primary Contact Norman Harry 775-265-8682 Name of Secondary Contact Michelle Hochrein 775-265-8689 Mailing Address 919 Highway 395 South, Gardnerville NV 89410 E-mail norman.harry@washoetribe.us; michelle.hochrein@washoetribe.us Phone (###)###-#### 775-265-8680 (WEPD front desk) Other Cooperating NA Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Woodfords Community Wastewater Infrastructure Upgrades Project Category X Wastewater i Restoration F Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description Complete necessary upgrades to Woodfords Community (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Wastewater System as recommended in Indian Health words or less) Services survey review of system deficiencies and additional infrastructure improvements. The project benefits include replacing aging wastewater infrastructure to preserve water supplies, protecting groundwater quality, and increasing the fire protection capabilities in the community. 1. Installation of a generator receptacle and generator to provide emergency power to the lift station. 2. Repair/replacement of lagoon fence where necessary 3. Inspect, evaluate, and repair(if necessary) all main and later sewer lines 4. Removal of weed and vegetative growth around the sewage treatment lagoons. 5. Replacement of lagoon liners (in all 3 ponds, utilize a staged approach) Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 2 of 2 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger This project will be included in the community-wide water Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3) ? conservation plan and upcoming Climate Change If so provide description. Vulnerabilities Assessment and Adaptation Plan. Tahoe Sierra IRWM Political Support—List related MOUs, Letter of Support from the Woodfords Community Council, agreements or TACs currently in place. attached. Project Location: Latitude: 38°47'41.322" N Longitude: 119°45'13.431"W Project Location Description (e.g.,along The Woodfords Community is located on Diamond Valley the south bank of stream/river Road, between West Fork Carson River and Indian Creek, in between river miles or miles from Woodfords,Alpine County, California. The latitude and Towns/intersection and/or address): longitude noted above are the coordinates for the approximate center of the community. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the F_ Yes attainment date, and participate in , N/A the development of future TMDLs. WQ2— Reduce pollutant loads by Replacement of leaking Approximately 4 implementing measures such as Yes wastewater delivery pipes acres of lagoon stormwater LID retrofits, erosion r N/A and treatment lagoons will pond liner will be control/restoration to meet Water reduce the possibility of evaluated and Quality Objectives (WQOs)for pollutants loads reaching replaced or receiving water bodies established in either the West Fork of the repaired. The the Basin Plan within the planning Carson River or Indian Creek. wastewater horizon. system for the 81 acre community of Woodfords, which serves 65 connections will be evaluated and upgraded. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through F Yes planning horizon, and coordinate , N/A annually throughout the Region. Project Template Page 2 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ4- Ensure that drinking water supplied by public water systems F Yes continues to meet Federal and State V N/A standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas Yes to re-establish natural water filtering V N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or Repair and replacement of Approximately 4 replace infrastructure for reliable V Yes lagoon liners with ensure for acres of lagoon collection, treatment and disposal of N/A the proper treatment of pond liner will be wastewater. community wastewater. evaluated and Inspection, evaluation, and replaced or repair of main and lateral repaired. The sewer lines will ensure wastewater delivery of wastewater to the system for the 81 treatment area. Both actions acre community will prevent wastewater from of Woodfords, entering the underlying which serves 65 groundwater system. connections will be evaluated and upgraded. WS1 - Provide water supply to meet projected demands for a 20-year r Yes planning horizon. N/A WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure to reliably Yes supply water. N/A WS3 - Implement and promote water conservation measures and practices Yes to meet state goals. N/A GWM1 - Maintain and monitor Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. ► N/A Project Template Page 3 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater Repair and replacement of Approximately 4 protection activities for high quality FY-1 Yes lagoon liners with ensure for acres of lagoon groundwater, and advocate for F N/A the proper treatment of pond liner will be improvements to impacted community wastewater. evaluated and groundwater quality through public Inspection, evaluation, and replaced or education. repair of main and lateral repaired. The sewer lines will ensure wastewater delivery of wastewater to the system for the 81 treatment area. Both actions acre community will prevent wastewater from of Woodfords, entering the underlying which serves 65 groundwater system. connections will be evaluated and upgraded. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural F7 N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies, wetlands, riparian areas and Yes associated uplands to support healthy r N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement Removal of weeds and Approximately 4 programs to prevent the spread of F7 Yes invasive species around the acres of lagoon existing invasive species and F- N/A lagoon ponds and pond liner will be colonization of potential future replacement of the lagoon evaluated and invasive species. liners will prevent spread of replaced or invasive species to repaired. surrounding sites. Project Template Page 4 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) ER3 - Implement, in coordination with Removal of weeds and Approximately 4 public and private landowners, F7 Yes invasive species around the acres of lagoon activities to manage forest health and F N/A lagoon ponds and pond liner will be wildfire risks. replacement of the lagoon evaluated and liners will prevent spread of replaced or invasive species to repaired. surrounding sites.The removal of the weeds and thatch layer will reduce the local wildfire spread risk. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F Yes caused by existing and new development. r N/A IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The project will involve multiple jurisdictions within the F7 Yes collaboration with federal Region for information exchange. r N/A and state partners, including Bureau of Land Management (BLM), IHS, and Alpine County in order to implement water conservation and infrastructure upgrade Best Management Practices (BMPs). IWM3 - Increase public education and This project will increase the awareness of watershed functions, F7 Yes community's awareness of protection and restoration needs to r N/A the environmental effects of encourage stewardship by the public. wastewater leakage and the need to protect the groundwater and downstream ecosystems through outreach efforts and community public meetings. Project Template Page 5 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. F Yes F71 N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Through inspecting, water quality,water supply, F Yes evaluating, and repairing any groundwater recharge,flood r N/A leaking infrastructure in the management) in local and regional community wastewater planning efforts and support efforts system,this project will help to continue improving the science. to quantify community needs and identify climate change vulnerabilities within the system.This will assist in future planning for community maintenance and/or expansion in relation to climate change adaptation. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in Yes order to improve coordination with F7 N/A regional planning. If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 6 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r- N/A The Woodfords Community is part of considerations. the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California, which is a federally recognized Native American tribe. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F- N/A The Woodfords Community is 100% DAC, with a median household income of approximately$28,000/year. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. r N/A This project has environmental justice benefits, as it would ensure the effective treatment of community wastewater and protect local groundwater resources and ecosystems. d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of F N/A This project will protect groundwater climate change'. quality for future generations through repairing aging infrastructure. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas R- N/A emissions (e.g.green technology). f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are r N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description,of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F- Yes F40- No Urban Water Use Efficiency F- Yes FV- No Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Project Template Page 7 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Conveyance- Regional/local %0 Yes No This project improves the Woodfords Community local wastewater conveyance infrastructure. System Reoperation F Yes F%O No Water Transfers F Yes P No crease Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater F Yes F%0_ No Desalination F Yes F%0_ No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water F Yes P No Surface Storage -- Regional/Local F Yes F%O No mprove Water Quality Drinking Water Treatment and F Yes F%_0 No Distribution Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation F Yes F%0_ No Matching Water Quality to Use F Yes F%0_ No Pollution Prevention P Yes F No This project will prevent wastewater leakage from contaminating the groundwater and downstream surface water. Salt and Salinity Management F Yes F%O No Urban Runoff Management F Yes FvO No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship F Yes W No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes FvO No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration F Yes W No Forest Management F Yes F No Land Use Planning and Management F Yes W No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes W No Water-dependent Recreation F Yes F No Watershed Management F Yes W No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management Yes %0 No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage—CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 8 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Page 9 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $588,000 $ 0 $588,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and 0 0 Maintenance (O8 b.Can the Project be phased? F,/- Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $25,000 There are no O&M Project Description items 1- costs related to this 2: Infrastructure upgrades phase. Phase 2 $60,000 There are no O&M Project Description item 3: costs related to this Inspect, evaluate, repair phase. sewer mains and laterals Phase 3 $503,000 There are no O&M Project Description items 4- costs related to this 5: Repair, replace, and phase. upgrade the sewer treatment lagoon liners Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- 0 cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- 0 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M Costs are included in the Washoe Tribe Water will be financed for the 25-year planning Utility Management Authority annual budget. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g.conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid,etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? % Yes 17- No h.Please describe what impact there may be if An unfunded project may result in groundwater the project is not funded. (300 words or less) contamination, surface water contamination, a reduction in fire protection capacity,and an increase in wildlife risk.The project does not necessary need to be phased in order listed, project phases may be staggered differently depending on immediate need. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants: Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation,Environmental Project Template Page 10 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and X No Assessment and 1/1/2019 TBD Evaluation X evaluations for the upgrades to Woodfords Community Wastewater Infrastructure have been conducted by Indian Health Services, as outlined in their review of system deficiencies. Leak detection and pond liner assessment though visual inspection are ongoing. b. Final Design X No Final design has been 1/1/2019 TBD X completed for Phase 1. Final design has not been completed for Phases 2 and 3. c. Environmental X No CEQA and NEPA are not TBD TBD Documentation required on Tribal lands (CEQA/NEPA) unless required by project funder. d. Permitting X NA Permits will not be TBD TBD necessary to complete specified projects on Tribal lands. e. Construction X No Some phases of the TBD TBD Contracting project will require RFPs, bids, and contract execution. f. Construction X No All phases of the project TBD TBD Implementation will include construction implementation. Project Template Page 11 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Provide explanation if more Assessments and evaluations have been initiated on all phases, and than one project stage is completed for Phase 1. Final designs have been completed for Phase 1. checked as current status Project Template Page 12 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date,title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Washoe Tribe Land Use Plan, project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Washoe Tribe Resource Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Management Plan,Washoe Tribe Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans,etc.) Development Planning System, Indian Health Services Woodfords Community Wastewater System Survey b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Indian Health Services Woodfords feasibility of this project Colony Community Wastewater System Survey c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Sewer leakage from aging research has been conducted) of the proposed project in infrastructure and treatment pond 300 words or less. liners has been identified to contain pollutant loads; repair and replacement of wastewater infrastructure can reduce potential pollution risks. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. X NA alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management X NA Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? X NA 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements X NA (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", X NA do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier2: 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due X NA 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior X NA to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: Project Template Page 13 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM g. If the project is related to groundwater: 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the X NA subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the X NA grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 14 of 14 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Template Please provide information in the tables below: I. Project Proponent Information Agency/Organization Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California -Washoe Environmental Protection Department (WEPD) Name of Primary Contact Norman Harry 775-265-8682 Name of Secondary Contact Michelle Hochrein 775-265-8689 Mailing Address 919 Highway 395 South, Gardnerville NV 89410 E-mail norman.harry@washoetribe.us; michelle.hochrein@washoetribe.us Phone (###)###-#### 775-265-8680 (WEPD front desk) Other Cooperating NA Agencies/Organizations/Stakeholders Is your agency/organization Yes committed to the project through completion? If not, please explain II. General Project Information Project Title Woodfords Community Water Infrastructure Upgrades Project Category X Water Supply F Restoration F Storm Water/Flood Control Project Description Complete necessary upgrades to Woodfords Community (Briefly describe the project, in 300 Water System as recommended in Indian Health Services words or less) review of system deficiencies (see PWSID#0600362) and additional infrastructure improvements.The project benefits include replacing aging water infrastructure to preserve water supplies and increasing the fire protection capabilities in the community. 1. Replacement of tank hatch gasket 2. Assist WUMA with the development of a Cross- Connection Control Program with IHS oversight 3. Installation of vacuum breakers on all hose bibs 4. Installation of a secondary containment system for sodium hypochlorite feed barrel 5. Installation of corrosion prevention paint on wells and paint all raw pipes entering the buildings 6. Replacement of sample taps to prevent contamination 7. Evaluate and modify of the drain structure on the tank overflow to recommended height 8. Repair tank level indicator 9. Purchase new operating and maintenance tools and equipment 10. Explore and install an alternative water source ('Well C'). Possibility to review old community well 'East Well' and pumphouse for inclusion into community Tahoe Sierra IRWM system (after required upgrades) or explore and install an alternative source 11. If'East Well' and associated pumphouse are not to be included in community system, infrastructure will be properly abandoned 12. Update existing fire hydrants and install new hydrant at all line ends (6) 13. Update and repair existing individual water meters and provide technological connections so that water use data may be efficiently collected 14. Inspect, evaluate, map service lines, and repair(if necessary) all main and later water lines Total number of projects 2 Project Prioritization: submitted by your Agency: Agency Prioritization of this 1 of 2 project(e.g.,3 of 5) Does this project contribute to a larger This project will be included in the community-wide water Project(e.g.,TMDL, EIP, Phase 2 of 3)? conservation plan and upcoming Climate Change If so provide description. Vulnerabilities Assessment and Adaptation Plan. Political Support—List related MOUs, Letter of Support from the Woodfords Community Council, agreements or TACs currently in place. available upon request. Project Location: Latitude: 38°47'41.322" N Longitude: 119°45'13.431" W Project Location Description (e.g.,along The Woodfords Community is located on Diamond Valley the south bank of stream/river Road, between West Fork Carson River and Indian Creek, in between river miles or miles from Woodfords,Alpine County, California. The latitude and Towns/intersection and/or address): longitude noted above are the coordinates for the approximate center of the community. III. Plan Objectives Addressed For each of the objectives addressed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project contributes to attaining the objective and how the project will be quantified. If the project does not address any of the draft IRWM plan objectives, provide a one to two sentence description of how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region (see the bottom of page 4). Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ1 - Meet approved TMDL standards in accordance with the F_ Yes attainment date, and participate in r N/A the development of future TMDLs. Project Template Page 2 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WQ2—Reduce pollutant loads by implementing measures such as F Yes stormwater LID retrofits, erosion N/A control/restoration to meet Water Quality Objectives (WQOs)for receiving water bodies established in the Basin Plan within the planning horizon. WQ3 - Implement water quality monitoring programs through F_ Yes planning horizon, and coordinate N/A annually throughout the Region. WQ4- Ensure that drinking water The infrastructure upgrades The water system supplied by public water systems V Yes will ensure health risks are for the 81 acre continues to meet Federal and State N/A minimized and water community of standards. contamination is prevented Woodfords, according to Indian Health which serves 65 Services standards (Health connections will Risk Priorities 0-4 as be upgraded to according to EPA's Dime ensure the supply Deficiency Coding System.) meets Federal standards. WQ5 - Restore degraded streams, wetlands, riparian and upland areas F_ Yes to re-establish natural water filtering N/A processes. WQ6-Operate and maintain, build, or replace infrastructure for reliable F_ Yes collection, treatment and disposal of N-0 N/A wastewater. Project Template Page 3 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) WS1 - Provide water supply to meet The project helps to maintain Installation of 1 projected demands for a 20-year F7 Yes the water supply for the new well and planning horizon. F N/A Woodfords Community. inspection, Installing an alternative evaluation, repair water source ('Well C' or of entire main revitalization of'East Well") and lateral lines will ensure the community that serve 65 has adequate water quality residential and quantity should Well A or connections. B become compromised. Inspection, evaluation, and repair of entire system will reduce waterline leaks and prevent water delivery wastes. WS2 -Operate and maintain, build, or The infrastructure repairs will Increased replace infrastructure to reliably %0 Yes upgrade the existing water reliability of supply water. N/A system components to water system for provide for more reliable and the 81 acre efficient infrastructure. community of Woodfords, which serves 65 connections. WS3 - Implement and promote water The project will conserve Increased conservation measures and practices %0 Yes water by inspecting, conservation of to meet state goals. N/A evaluating, and repairing the water supply aging and leaking waterlines. for the 81 acre It will promote water community of conservation measure and Woodfords, practices with an emphasis which serves 65 on leak detection and connections. identification of the highest priority waterlines for repair. GWM1 - Maintain and monitor F Yes groundwater supply to assure future reliability. r N/A Project Template Page 4 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) GWM2 - Promote groundwater protection activities for high quality F Yes groundwater, and advocate for P N/A improvements to impacted groundwater quality through public education. GWM3 - Manage groundwater for multiple uses (e.g. F Yes municipal/industrial/agricultural P N/A supply and environmental use). ER1 - Enhance and restore water bodies,wetlands, riparian areas and F Yes associated uplands to support healthy P N/A watersheds,viable native fish, wildlife, and plant habitats. ER2 - Develop and implement programs to prevent the spread of F Yes existing invasive species and P N/A colonization of potential future invasive species. ER3 - Implement, in coordination with The installation of additional Reduced risk of public and private landowners, F7 Yes fire hydrants and upgrade of wildfire spread in activities to manage forest health and r N/A existing hydrants will reduce the 81 acre wildfire risks. the risk of wildfire spread community of throughout the rural Woodfords. community. ER4- Minimize ecosystem impacts F7 Yes This project will focus on Conservation of caused by existing and new repairing and reusing existing existing development. F N/A infrastructure where possible vegetation and to prevent the ecosystem habitats in the 81 impacts caused by new utility acre community development. of Woodfords. IWM1 -Conduct local and regional water-related planning activities F Yes within the planning horizon as r N/A supported by current and future watershed science. Project Template Page 5 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Objectives: Will the project Brief explanation of project Quantification address the linkage to selected Objective (e.g.acres of objective? streams/wetlands restored or enhanced) IWM2 - Ensure collaboration among The project will involve multiple jurisdictions within the F7 Yes collaboration with federal Region for information exchange. F N/A and state partners, including Bureau of Land Management (BLM), IHS, and Alpine County in order to implement water conservation and infrastructure upgrade Best Management Practices (BMPs). IWM3 - Increase public education and This project will increase the awareness of watershed functions, Fy' Yes Woodfords Community protection and restoration needs to r N/A awareness of water encourage stewardship by the public. conservation and protection through outreach efforts and community public meetings. IWM4- Promote activities that reduce flood risk. r Yes R N/A IWM5 -Address climate change (e.g. Through inspecting, water quality,water supply, F7 Yes evaluating, and repairing any groundwater recharge,flood r N/A leaking infrastructure in the management) in local and regional community water system, planning efforts and support efforts this project will help to to continue improving the science. quantify community needs and identify climate change vulnerabilities within the system,which will assist in future planning for community maintenance and/or expansion in relation to climate change adaptation. IWM6- Monitor water storage, release and exchange activities in Yes order to improve coordination with F7 N/A regional planning. Project Template Page 6 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM If no objectives are addressed; describe how the project relates to a challenge or opportunity of the Region: Project Template Page 7 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Impacts and Benefits Please provide a summary of the expected project benefits and impacts in the table below or check N/A if not applicable; do not leave a blank cell. If applicable describe benefits or impacts of the project with respect to: a. Native American Tribal Community r- N/A The Woodfords Community is part of considerations. the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California, which is a federally recognized Native American tribe. b. Disadvantaged Community considerations'. F- N/A The Woodfords Community is 100% DAC, with a median household income of approximately$28,000/year. c. Environmental Justice'considerations. r N/A This project has environmental justice benefits, as it would ensure the water quality and quantity of the water supply for a minority community. d. Assist the Region in adapting to effects of r- N/A This project will reduce water waste climate change'. through repairing aging infrastructure and ensuring continued water quality in case of reduced water availability. e. Generation or reduction of greenhouse gas F N/A Water conservation effort result in emissions (e.g.green technology). less potable water treatment and distribution,which has been identified as a high use of energy. Reducing the community energy usage related to water distribution will reduce the community's carbon footprint, through increased energy conservation, deferred new energy generation, and reduced peak energy demand. f. Other expected impacts or benefits that are 7 N/A not already mentioned elsewhere. 1.A Disadvantaged Community is defined as a community with an annual median household(MHI)income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual MHI. A map has been provided with the Project Template Instruction for reference. 2. Environmental Justice is defined as the fair treatment of people of all races,cultures,and incomes with respect to the development,adoption,implementation and enforcement of environmental laws,regulations and policies. An example of environmental justice benefit would be to improve conditions(e.g.water supply,flooding,sanitation)in an area of racial minorities 3.Climate change effects are likely to include increased flooding,extended drought,and associated secondary effects such as increased wildfire risk,erosion,and sedimentation. IV. Resource Management Strategies (RMS) For each resource management strategy employed by the project, provide a one to two sentence description in the table below of how the project incorporates the strategy. A description of the Resource Management Strategies can be found in Volume 2 of the 2009 California Water Plan here: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2009/index.cfm Project Template Page 8 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Reduce Water Demand Agricultural Water Use Efficiency F Yes %0 No Urban Water Use Efficiency F%O Yes I No This project will reduce water waste and reinforce water efficiency through implementation of urban BMPs. Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers Conveyance - Regional/ local F%-O Yes I— No This project improves the Woodfords Community local drinking water supply conveyance infrastructure. System Reoperation r Yes F%-O No Water Transfers F- Yes W No Increase Water Supply Conjunctive Management& Groundwater %0 Yes F- No This project maintains the sustainability of the groundwater supply by promoting infrastructure leak detection/repair and water conservation. Desalination F Yes F40 No Precipitation Enhancement Recycled Municipal Water r Yes F40 No Surface Storage -- Regional/Local F Yes F%O No Improve Water Quality 71 Drinking Water Treatment and 5-0 Yes F No This project improves the Woodfords Distribution Community drinking water distribution systems and enhances the sustainability of the water supply. Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation Yes F%O No Matching Water Quality to Use Yes F%# No Pollution Prevention r Yes V No Salt and Salinity Management Yes F%O No Urban Runoff Management Yes F%# No Practice Resources Stewardship Agricultural Lands Stewardship Yes F%O No Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and F Yes r No Water Pricing) Ecosystem Restoration Yes F%-O No Forest Management r Yes W No Land Use Planning and Management r Yes 170 No Recharge Areas Protection F Yes r No Project Template Page 9 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Resource Management Strategy Will the Project Description, of how RMS to be incorporate employed if applicable RMS? Water-dependent Recreation i— Yes F No Watershed Management F_ Yes r No Improve Flood Management Flood Risk Management Yes %0 No Note:The following RMS have been omitted from the list:Conveyance-Delta and Surface Storage-CALFED. Other RMS addressed and explanation: Project Template Page 10 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM V. Project Cost and Financing - Please provide any estimates of project cost, sources of funding, and operation and maintenance costs, as well as, the source of the project cost in the table below. a.Project Costs Requested Cost Share: Non- Cost Share: Total Cost Grant State Fund Source Other State Amount (Local/Federal Fund Source Funding Match) 1. Capital (2013 Dollars) $365,000 $ 0 $365,000 OR DAC 2. Annual Operations and 0 0 Maintenance (O8 b.Can the Project be phased? F,/- Yes No 1. If so provide cost Project Cost O&M Cost Description of Phase breakdown by phase(s) Phase 1 $17,500 There are no O&M Project Description items costs related to this 1-9: Infrastructure upgrades phase. Phase 2 $110,000 There are no O&M Project Description items costs related to this 10-11: Provide alternative phase. water source Phase 3 $30,000 These are no O&M Project Description item 12: costs related to this Increase fire protection phase. capacity Phase 4 $107,500 There are no O&M Project description item 13: costs related to this Update water meters phase. Phase 5 $100,000 There are no O&M Project description item 14: costs related to this Inspect, evaluate, repair phase. mains and laterals Source(s) Amount c.List secured source(s) of funding for Project -- 0 cost d.List proposed source(s) of unsecured funding -- 0 and certainty of the sources for Project cost. e.Explain how operation and maintenance costs O&M Costs are included in the Washoe Tribe Water will be financed for the 25-year planning Utility Management Authority annual budget. period for project implementation (not grant funded). f. Basis for project cost'(e.g. conceptual, Conceptual planning, bid, etc.) g.Has a Cost/Benefit analysis been completed? ► Yes No h.Please describe what impact there may be if An unfunded project would result in no additional the project is not funded. (300 words or less) water efficiency and saving, increased risk of exposure to unhealthy arsenic levels, no increase in community fire protection, and a lack of individual water use data collection for water conservation education purposes.The project does not necessary Project Template Page 11 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM need to be phased in order listed, project phases may be staggered differently depending on immediate need. 1. For the grant application a detailed project cost estimate will need to be provided with the following cost categories; per the IRWM PSP for Round 2,Implementation Grants:Direct Project Administration, Land Purchase/Easement, Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation,Construction/Implementation, Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement,Construction Administration,Other Costs,and Construction/Implementation Contingency. VI. Project Status and Schedule-Please provide a status of the project, level of completion as well as a description of the activities planned for each project stage. If unknown enter TBD. Project Stage Check the Completed? Description of Activities Planned/ Planned/Actu Current in Each Project Stage Actual al Completion Project Start Date Date(mm/yr) Stage (mm/yr) a. Assessment and X No Assessment and 1/1/2019 TBD Evaluation X evaluations for the upgrades to Woodfords Community Water System have been conducted by Indian Health Services, as outlined in their review of system deficiencies. Leak detection though water meter database review and line walks are ongoing. b. Final Design X No Final design has been 1/1/2019 TBD X completed for Phase 1. Final design has not been completed for Phases 2- 5. c. Environmental X No CEQA and NEPA are not TBD TBD Documentation required on Tribal lands (CEQA/NEPA) unless required by project funder. d. Permitting X NA Permits will not be NA NA necessary to complete specified projects on Project Template Page 12 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Tribal lands. e. Construction X No Some phases of the TBD TBD Contracting project will require RFPs, bids, and contract execution. f. Construction X No All phases of the project TBD TBD Implementation will include construction implementation. Provide explanation if more Assessments and evaluations have been initiated on all phases, and than one project stage is completed for Phase 1. Final designs have been completed for Phase 1. checked as current status Project Template Page 13 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM Vill. Project Technical Feasibility Please provide any related documents (date, title, author, and page numbers)that describe and confirm the technical feasibility of the project. a. List the adopted planning documents the proposed Washoe Tribe Land Use Plan, project is consistent with or supported by(e.g. General Washoe Tribe Resource Plans, UWMPs, GWMPs,Water Master Plans, Habitat Management Plan, Washoe Tribe Conservation Plans,TMDLs, Basin Plans, etc.) Development Planning System, Indian Health Services Woodfords Community Water System Report b. List technical reports and studies supporting the Indian Health Services Woodfords feasibility of this project Colony Community Water System Survey PWSID#0600362 c. Concisely describe the scientific basis(e.g. how much Ongoing water usage and waste research has been conducted) of the proposed project in research is conducted through leak 300 words or less. detection and water meter usage assessments.This data will be used to identify water leaks and recommended infrastructure upgrades with in the water system. d. Does the project implement green technology(e.g. X NA alternate forms of energy, recycled materials, LID techniques, etc.) 1.If so please describe e. If you are an Urban Water Supplier': 1.Have you completed an Urban Water Management X NA Plan and submitted to DWR? 2.Are you in compliance with AB1420? X NA 3.Do you comply with the water meter requirements X NA (CWC§525) 4.If the answer to any of the questions above is "no", X NA do you intend to comply prior to receiving project funding Provide Explanation if necessary: f. If you are an Agricultural Water Supplier': 1. Have you completed and submitted an AWMP(due X NA 12/31/12)? 2. If not,will you complete and submit an AWMP prior X NA to receiving project funding? Provide Explanation if necessary: g. If the project is related to groundwater: Project Template Page 14 of 15 12/11/13 Tahoe Sierra IRWM 1. Hasa GWMP been completed and submitted for the X NA subject basin? 2. If not will a GWMP be completed within 1 year of the X NA grant submittal date? 1.Urban Water Supplier is defined as a supplier,either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. 2.Agricultural Water Supplier is defined as a water supplier,either publicly or privately owned,providing water to 10,000 or more irrigated acres,excluding the acreage that receives recycled water. Project Template Page 15 of 15 12/11/13 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0012-Tahoe Valley Greenbelt (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://laketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?return Uri=https%3a%2f%2fIaketa hoe info.org%2fProject%2fD eta il%2f83) Project (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjectList) ' 01.01.01.0012 - Tahoe Valley Greenbelt (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0012) (https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/Index) (https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS AProject Description The Greenbelt project includes multi-benefit stormwater,SEZ,bicycle and pedestrian improvements and recreational amenities.Water quality and SEZ enhancements will include improving existing drainage ways and drainage systems to spread,treat,infiltrate,and retain flows from roadways,commercial areas,and other high priority,directly connected urban areas.Pedestrian and bicycle will include improving connectivity within the project area and to regional networks. A Stage Planning/Design 0Planning/Design Start Year 2009 0Implementation Start Year 2021 ACompletion Year 2022 a Estimated Total Cost $6,000,000 A Primary Contact Stan Hill(shill@cityofslt.us(mailto:shill@cityofslt.us)) AAdded On 06/01/2014 ALast Updated 07/16/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/83 1/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 01.01.01.0012-Tahoe Valley Greenbelt To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. 4 a P�� South L e Barton - Taho Memorial HospFa l' i 4 i - - Golden Bear Trl q c+ L,4.a TA., l Wit ¢'u Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.9135 Longitude: -120.0042 State: CA County/City: City of South Lake Tahoe Watershed: Upper Truckee River Info: ORGANIZATIONS BOrganization ol-ead Implementer 0implementer oFunder 0 Primary Contact California Department of Transportation(Caltrans) O Nadarajah(Sutha)Suthahar-California Department (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/2) of Transportation(Caltrans) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/2) California State Water Resources Control Board Robert Larsen-California State Water Resources (SWRCB) Control Board(SWRCB) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 097) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 097) City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) O O Stan Hill-City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) Kimberly Caringer-Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 8) (TRPA) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 8) U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Management O Joey Keely-U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Unit(USFS-LTBMU) Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) EIP BASICS CQ VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0012) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0012) 0ElP Focus Area 01-Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AElP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) A EIP Action Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) A Project 01.01.01.0012-Tahoe Valley Greenbelt https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/83 2/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0012-Tahoe Valley Greenbelt This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). LAKE CLARITY BASICS OTMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire Expand Level Collapse Level Search... Q Benefit Category )�Question Answer Score — Water Quality 4 .................................... + ....................... Fine sediment load reduction(lb/yr) 4400 5 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Nitro ............ .. . . .......... ............ . . .............. ............................................................. . .................. . ............................................................ .............. . .. ........................................................................... Phosphorous load reduction(lb/yr) 65+ 5 Parcels with ) stormwater BMPs(number) 1 to 4 1 Drains to TMDL waterbody Yes 3 ...................................__ ........................................................................................... Provides source control for stormwater pollutant Yes 3 ..................................__ _....................................................._....................................... Pollutant load reduction Approved TMDL 5 pollutant ( Y) ................ ................... Volume of stormwater treated Af/ r >1.9 5 .......... . . . . . ................................................................................... ................. Total suspended solid load reduction(lb/yr) 25,000-50,000 4 Environment 1 ........................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................... Linear feet of stream channel restored or enhanced(linear feet) 1 to 150 1 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Acres of habitat restored or enhanced(acres) 0.1 to 1 1 — Community 2.6 Facilities improved or created number 1 to 2 1 ._.._.._..... p ( ) Tahoe disadvantaged community(DAC)population served Yes 3 ..................................... _............................................................................................. Project enhances or creates community areas Yes 3 ....................................... __.. ........................................................... Employment opportunity created Short-term 3 ro roves PeKY Project improves values Yes 3 J P property Flood Management 2.2 Volume of stormwater reduced ( Y stored or infiltrated Af/ r) 2 to 3 4 Proximity to flood-prone channel(miles) >1 1 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ................................................. Runoff reduced through storage or infiltration Yes,minor flooding 3 ......................................P................... .........(....�... locally Impervious area reduced % <30 0 .......................................................-- ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Natural hydrology/hydrograph reestablished Yes 3 Questionnaire Score:9.8 TRANSPORTATION BASICS eTransportation Strategy Bike and Pedestrian(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationStrategy/Detail/1) eTransportation Objective C-I/Shared Use(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationObjective/Detail/2) eThis project is on the Federal Transportation Improvement Program(FTIP)list Yes eFunding Type Capital eCost in Year of Expenditure ESTIMATED BUDGETS r' Download Data(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/TransportationBudgetByFundingSourceExcelDownload/83) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/83 3/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0012-Tahoe Valley Greenbelt A Funding Source/Cost Type Total 2022 2021 2020 2019 AQ Mitigation Funds(TRPA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1) $130,000 Preliminary Engineering $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(CSLT)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l0) $94,130 Preliminary Engineering $94,130 $0 $0 $0 $51,695 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Proposition 1 (SWRCB)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l152) $381,920 Preliminary Engineering $381,920 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SEZ Mitigation Funds(TRPA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/33) $134,547 Preliminary Engineering $134,547 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act(USFWS)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l061) $300,000 Preliminary Engineering $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES 0EIP Performance Measure ASubcategories A Expected Value Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted None 12.8 miles (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) Miles of Street Sweeping None 12.8 miles (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/6/Overview) Acres of SEZ Restored or Enhanced [Action Performed:Enhanced] 1.5 acres (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/9/Overview) Miles of Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes Improved or Constructed [Action Performed:Improved],[Path or Route Type:Class 0.5 miles (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/23/Overview) I/Shared Use Path] Educational and Interpretive Programs Produced [Primary EIP Program:Stormwater Management], number (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/28/Overview) [Program Objective:Education and Interpretation] REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING a Estimated Total Cost $6,000,000 ASecured Funding $1,040,597 oUnfunded Need $4,959,403 ($5,000,000 identified as ATargeted Funding) Funding Sources https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/83 4/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0012-Tahoe Valley Greenbelt AFundingSource oSecured eTargeted Total Funding Funding AQ Mitigation Funds(TRPA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Funding5ource/Detail/1) $130,000 $0 $130,000 City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(CSLT)(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/10) $94,130 $0 $94,130 Lake Tahoe Restoration Act(USFS-LTBMU)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1159) $0 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Proposition 1 (SWRCB)(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1152) $381,920 $0 $381,920 SEZ Mitigation Funds(TRPA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Funding5ource/Detail/33) $134,547 $0 $134,547 Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act(USFS-LTBMU) $300,000 $0 $300,000 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/35) Total $1,040,597 $5,000,000 $6,040,597 REPORTED EXPENDITURES AFundingSource 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total AQ Mitigation Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,636 $12,471 $63,998 $88,105 (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/1) City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund $3,000 $0 $0 $60 $273 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,333 (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Funding5ource/Detail/10) SEZ Mitigation Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,850 $44,361 $111,211 (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/33) U.S.Forest Service $0 $0 $1,516 $6,075 $2,685 $0 $700 $277,827 $11,197 $0 $300,000 (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/48) Total $3,000 $0 $1,516 $6,135 $2,958 $0 $700 $289,463 $90,518 $108,359 $502,649 PHOTOS y3 i - 2016-Inadequate Bike path flooding in SEZ drainage creates flooding (Timing:Before)(-3,000 on South Avenue(major KB) access roadt Barton Hospital) itao l) P Y/ esource la FileR /Dis Resource/ad886684-13fO-4ef4-852c-Oe471428ea32 (Timing:Before)(-3,109 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/e2efeed0-71 dc-48e9-a987-c1 a2cba2f7f Homeless camp and fuel Remnant concrete loading in greenbelt SEZ structure in SEZ area (Timing:Before)(-1,028 (Timing:Before)(-2,905 KB) KB) /FileResource/Di spl ayReso u rce/3135e3 b2-1019-49 a 1-b 715-56cf%ba 9849) /FileResource/DisplayResource/f72e3446-d50d-4d59-836d-4f7601Obc873 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/83 5/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0012-Tahoe Valley Greenbelt Tahoe Valley Greenbelt Unprotected Road Conceptual Plan Shoulders-Bonanza Ave. (Timing:After)(-42 KB) (Timing:Before)(-2,203 /FileResource/DisplayResource/cf806dcb-3c6c-4f8d-a91d-73e4a3192983 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/11446cfc-cl47-4f27-b242-b92620564277) ..94", +. F"`A�f_ Used needles and burnt spoons removed during trash cleanup(2015) (Timing:Before)(-2,097 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/5b2cf79c-5475-48c1-9748-682e8e2784a1 AWATERSHEDS ■ Upper Truckee River(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/62) oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Air Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/AirQuality) ■ Recreation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/Recreation) ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/SoilConservation) ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality) LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Area Plan-Tahoe Valley(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l 6) • Linking Tahoe-Regional Transportation Plan 2016 Constrained List(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l2) ■ Linking Tahoe Corridor Plan:Meyers/"Y"(Alpaca Station)(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l021) oEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES 04/09/2019 12:07 PM Stan Hill A pedestrian crossing on Emerald Bay Road(AKA U.S.Highway 50)was originally planned as a part of the overall Tahoe Valley Greenbelt project.The City acknowledges a pedestrian crossing at B Street will provide a direct connection between the Bonanza area neighborhoods and the Greenbelt area.However,Caltrans approval of a crossing at B Street will delay construction of the entire project.In the interest of allowing the Greenbelt work and water quality improvement work located on the westerly side of Emerald Bay Road and downstream of Lake Tahoe Blvd,the B Street crossing will be pursued as a separate project,but under the same EIP number. https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/83 6/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0012-Tahoe Valley Greenbelt 07/22/2016 2:03 PM Jason Burke The project will provide additional benefits that are not currently tracked in this tool(but are requirements for funding sources that prioritize multi-benefit projects and use of stormwater as a resource).As noted in the project description included in the Tahoe Sierra Integrated Regional Water Management Plan(Tahoe Sierra IRWM),the project includes the following additional benefits: -Flood Management(decreased flood risk attained by using distributed infiltration systems to reduce runoff rates and volumes at the source), -Water Supply(augmentation of groundwater through increased infiltration of dry weather and wet weather flows) -Community Mobility-enhanced bicycle and pedestrian connections consistent with regional active transportation plans. -Water Quality(increased infiltration to provide runoff treatment,source controls and re- establishing natural drainage hydrology impacted by urban development and hydromodification). 10/05/2015 9:55 AM Jeanne McNamara At the request of the City of South Lake Tahoe,the Tahoe Valley Stormwater Project and the Tahoe Valley SEZ Restoration projects were combined into one project. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://Sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfiirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/83 7/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0021 -Country Club Heights Stormwater Management and Erosion Control Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail°/a2f229) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjectList) ` 01.01.01.0021 - Country Club Heights Stormwater Management and Erosion... (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0021) (https://clarity.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description The project is located within the Country Club Heights subdivision(Units 1-5)more specifically between Crystal Air Drive at the upper southerly boundary to US Highway 50 to the north and Thunderbird Drive at the upper westerly boundary to the Upper Truckee River to the west.The main goal of this project is to reduce very fine/fine sediment from the County right-of-way from reaching the Upper Truckee River near Elks Club Road to the TMDL set by Lahontan under their NPDES future permits conditions. •Stage Implementation •Planning/Design Start Year 2011 •Implementation Start Year 2018 •Completion Year 2019 •Estimated Total Cost $1,774,746 •Primary Contact Donaldo Palaroan(donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us(mailto:donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us)) •Added On 06/01/2014 •Last Updated 01/03/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/229 1/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0021 -Country Club Heights Stormwater Management and Erosion Control Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. + e-a pad. �' ireValkj iv L.W Tahoe Golf C nurse Pal �i gn W Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.8662 Longitude: -120.0043 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: Upper Truckee River I nfo: 18259.054803 ORGANIZATIONS 00rganization 0 Lead Implementer 0lmplementer AFunder 0 Primary Contact El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) Donaldo Palaroan-El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) 0 KimberlyCaringer-Tahoe Regional Planning (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/18) Agency(TRPA) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 8) U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin O Joey Keely-U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) EIP BASICS Q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0021) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0021) 0 El P Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) 0ElPAction Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) 0 Project 01.01.01.0021 -Country Club Heights Stormwater Management and Erosion Control Project 001d EIP# 189 This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https:Heip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/229 2/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0021 -Country Club Heights Stormwater Management and Erosion Control Project LAKE CLARITY BASICS OTMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire Expand Level Collapse Level I5earch... O Benefit Category )�Question Answer Score — Water Quality 3.7 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_................................................................................................................. Fine sediment load reduction(lb/yr) 4400+ 5 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_................................................................................................................. Nitrogen load reduction(lb/yr) 11 to 20 4 ............................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................._ ........................................................................... Phosphorous load reduction(lb/yr) 27 to 50 3 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Parcels with stormwater BMPs(number) 300+ 5 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Drains to TMDL waterbody Yes 3 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_................................................................................................................. Provides source control for stormwater pollutant Yes 3 Pollutant load reduction APproved TMDL 5 pollutant ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_................................................................_....................................... Volume of stormwater treated(Af/yr) 0.7-1.2 2 .. ............................... Total suspended solid load reduction(lb/yr) 10,000-30,000 3 — Environment 3.5 Linear feet of stream channel restored or enhanced(linear feet) 800 5 Acres of habitat restored or enhanced(acres) 0.5 to 2 2 — Community 1A Facilities improved or created number 1 to 2 1 P (number) Tahoe disadvantaged community(DAC)population served No 0 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_................................................................................................................. Project enhances or creates community areas Yes 3 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_................................................................................................................. Employment opportunity created No 0 ................................ ................................. Project improves property values Yes 3 Flood Management 2 .................... Volume of stormwater reduced,stored or infiltrated(Af/yr) 0.75 to 1.5 2 Proximity .P to flood .. flood-prone channel miles 0.75-0.25 2 ................................................................ ............................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Runoff reduced through storage or infiltration Yes,minor flooding 3 locally ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... < ........................................................................... Impervious area reduced(%) 30 0 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Natural hydrology/hydrograph reestablished Yes 3 Questionnaire Score:10.6 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES OEIP Performance Measure OSubcategories OExpected Value Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detai1/5/Overview) None miles REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) O Subcategories Property Ownership Road Type Treatment Type 2018 Total Units El Dorado County Paved Retrofitted 5.1 5.1 miles Total 5.1 5.1 miles Miles of Street Sweeping(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/6/Overview) O Subcategories Equipment Type Property Ownership 2018 Total Units https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/229 3/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0021 -Country Club Heights Stormwater Management and Erosion Control Project High-Efficiency Vacuum-Assisted Dry Sweeper El Dorado County 6.1 6.1 miles Total 6.1 6.1 miles EXPECTED FUNDING AEstimated Total Cost $1,774,746 ASecured Funding $1,774,746 AUnfunded Need $0 ($35,500 identified as oTargeted Funding) Funding Sources 0 Funding Source ASecured ATargeted Total Funding Funding Proposition 1 (CTC)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 153) $250,000 $0 $250,000 Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act(USFS-LTBMU) $1,469,746 $0 $1,469,746 (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/35) WQ Mitigation Funds(TRPA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/52) $55,000 $35,500 $90,500 Total $1,774,746 $35,500 $1,810,246 REPORTED EXPENDITURES A Funding Source 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act $6,662 $1,238 $2,091 $4,862 $28,855 $228,524 $129,140 $798,226 $1,199,598 (https://laketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/35) WQ Mitigation Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,240 $0 $25,000 $69,240 (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/52) Total $6,662 $1,238 $2,091 $4,862 $28,855 $272,764 $129,140 $823,226 $1,268,838 PHOTOS https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/229 4/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0021 -Country Club Heights Stormwater Management and Erosion Control Project efi Elks Club Drive-System Eroding channel difficult to sweep causing (Timing:Before)(-1,110 easy transport of KB) sediment(Timing:Before)(-2,643 p y/FileResource/Dis la Resource/cOe25bOb-350f-420c-b5e5-3a1867ce65be) KB) /Fi IeResou rce/DisplayResource/3675e6f6-Oed8-4e74-94cb-75969cc7364c Meadowvale Basin near New channel on east side corner of Boca Raton and of lower Elks Club Drive Meadowvale Drive (Timing:After)(-234 KB) (Timing:After)(-237 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/8cO8d52a-101-4432-8e98-bdO58059d721 /FileResource/DisplayResource/b7d1 d568-2707-4e17-9f27-01404bb8f194) New outlet channel to Sediment Deposition- meadow area off of Boca Elks Club and Raton Thunderbird Court (Timing:After)(-259 KB) (Timing:Before)(-2,489 /FileResource/DisplayResource/798371af-bcf8-44ed-bdda-7bde4295ca7e KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/bb344888-1 f0b-4fed-8b38-666f929ac76c r x Shotcrete wall on Meadow Vale Drive (Timing:Before)(-1,009 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/d280c12f-c1 bc-4e8b-ad63-f733b999e877 oWATERSHEDS ■ Upper Truckee River(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/62) oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/SoilConservation) ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/229 5/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0021 -Country Club Heights Stormwater Management and Erosion Control Project A LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Linking Tahoe-Regional Transportation Plan 2016 Constrained List(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l2) ■ Linking Tahoe Corridor Plan:MeyersPY'(Alpaca Station)(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detai1/1021) AEXTERNAL LINKS Project Webpage(https://www.edcgov.us/Government/dot/TahoeEngineering/Pages/country_club_heights_erosion_control_project.aspx)a (https://www.edcgov.us/Government/dot/Ta hoeEngi neering/Pages/cou ntry_clu b_heights_erosion_control_project.aspx) NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/229 6/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0025-Meyers Stream Environment Zone/Erosion Control Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail°/a2f239) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FUllProjeCtLiSt) ` 01.01.01.0025 - Meyers Stream Environment Zone/Erosion Control Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0025) (https://clarity.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description This project aims to restore approximately nine acres of stream environment zone(SEZ)partially through the reconnection of Meyers Creek to its floodplain.In the 1960's,Meyers Creek was channelized linearly along the border of the SEZ to make way for urban development.The parcel is located on Santa Fe Road at the west end of Pioneer Trail in Meyers.By reconnecting the creek to its floodplain to restore wetland processes.The project will also have greenhouse gas reductions,groundwater recharge,flood control,water efficiency,possible regional treatment systems,and recreation.This project treats 5 miles of roadways through source control and hydrologic design. •Stage Implementation •Planning/Design Start Year 2010 •Implementation Start Year 2017 •Completion Year 2019 •Estimated Total Cost $2,994,454 •Primary Contact Donaldo Palaroan(donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us(mailto:donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us)) •Added On 06/01/2014 •Last Updated 01/02/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/239 1/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0025-Meyers Stream Environment Zone/Erosion Control Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. Lake Tahoe /Watlp Go if Course RRR L ti v P �y n E ca � f Tahoe �9d Pa redise GoIF Course C7�Or V Chippewdst ImgiA Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.8613 Longitude: -120.0152 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: Upper Truckee River Info: 95179 ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization ALead Implementer Almplementer AFunder 0 Primary Contact California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) 0 Stuart Roll-California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/3) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/3) El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) G) Donaldo Palaroan-El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/6) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) 0 Kimberly Caringer-Tahoe Regional Planning (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l8) Agency(TRPA) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/18) U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin (2) Joey Keely-U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/21) EIP BASICS C1 VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0025) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0025) A EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) 0 EIP Action Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) A Project 01.01.01.0025-Meyers Stream Environment Zone/Erosion Control Project A Old EIP# 191 https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/239 2/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0025-Meyers Stream Environment Zone/Erosion Control Project This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). LAKE CLARITY BASICS OTMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire Expand Level Collapse Level Search... O Benefit Category )�Question Answer Score — Water Quality 4.4 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_................................................................................................................. Fine sediment load reduction(lb/yr) 4400+ 5 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_........................................................................._....................................... Nitrogen load reduction(lb/yr) 18+ 5 ..................................................................... Phosphorous load reduction(Ib/yr)............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 65+ 5 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Parcels with stormwater BMPs(number) 100 to 360 4 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Drains to TMDL waterbody Yes .. .. .. .. . 3 ................................ .............................................................................. Provides source control for stormwater pollutant Yes 3 Pollutant load reduction Approved TMDL 5 pollutant ............................................. ............................................. Volume of stormwater treated(Af/yr) >1.9 5 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._ .................. Total suspended solid load reduction(lb/yr) 45,000+ 5 — Environment 4.5 Linear feet of stream channel restored or enhanced(linear feet) 800 5 Acres of habitat restored or enhanced(acres) 5 to 15 4 — Community 1.8 Facilities improved or created number 3 to 4 3 ...................................__ P (number) Tahoe disadvantaged community(DAC)population served No 0 ................................_ .........................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Project enhances or creates community areas Yes 3 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_................................................................................................................. Employment opportunity created No 0 ................................ ....................................................................................... Project improves property values Yes 3 Flood Management 2.8 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._............................................................................__................................. Volume of stormwater reduced,stored or infiltrated(Af/yr) 2.75+ 5 Proximity .P to flood .. flood-prone channel miles 0.75-0.25 2 _............................................................... ............................ ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._.................................................................._... ...................................... Runoff reduced through storage or infiltration Yes,minor flooding 3 locally .................................. .... ............................._....................................... Impervious area reduced(%) 25-45 1 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Natural hydrology/hydrograph reestablished Yes 3 Questionnaire Score:13.5 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES OEIP Performance Measure OSubcategories 0Expected Value Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted None 5 miles (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) Linear Feet of Stream Channel Restored or Enhanced None linear (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/7/Overview) feet Impervious Coverage Retired None square (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/8/Overview) feet Acres of SEZ Restored or Enhanced None acres (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/9/Overview) Acres of Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquired [Acres of Environmentally Sensitive Land acres (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/10/Overview) Acquired:General] Miles of Trails Developed or Improved None miles (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/26/Overview) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/239 3/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0025-Meyers Stream Environment Zone/Erosion Control Project REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Miles of Street Sweeping(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/6/Overview) A Subcategories Equipment Type Property Ownership 2017 Total Units Regenerative Air El Dorado County 1 1 miles Total 1 1 miles Impervious Coverage Retired(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/8/Overview) A Subcategories Land Capability of Coverage Retired Type of Coverage Retired 2017 Total Units 1a Existing 2,144 2,144 square feet 5 Existing 201 201 square feet Total 2,345 2,345 square feet Acres of SEZ Restored or Enhanced(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/9/Overview) A Subcategories Action Performed 2017 Total Units Restored 3.5 3.5 acres Total 3.5 3.5 acres Acres of Habitat Restored or Enhanced(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/12/Overview) A Subcategories Action Performed Habitat Type 2017 Total Units Enhanced SEZ/Wetland 0.84 0.84 acres Total 0.84 0.84 acres No accomplishments to report for: Year(s) 2018,2019 Explanation Nothing to report for 2018&2019. EXPECTED FUNDING a Estimated Total Cost $2,994,454 ASecured Funding $1,881,920 a Unfunded Need $1,112,534 ($500,000 identified as ATargeted Funding) Funding Sources a Funding Source ASecured ATargeted Total Funding Funding California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/7) $776,352 $0 $776,352 Lake Tahoe Restoration Act(USFS-LTBMU)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 159) $0 $500,000 $500,000 SEZ Mitigation Funds(TRPA)(https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/33) $308,728 $0 $308,728 Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act(USFS-LTBMU) $796,840 $0 $796,840 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/35) Total $1,881,920 $500,000 $2,381,920 REPORTED EXPENDITURES https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/239 4/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0025-Meyers Stream Environment Zone/Erosion Control Project a Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 California Tahoe Conservancy $0 $0 $7,648 $0 $9,987 $6,091 $260,881 $678,334 $2,326 $961 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/7) SEZ Mitigation Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $183,509 $93,474 $14,840 $0 $29' (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/33) Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act $33,057 $134,039 $34,730 $23,238 $88,107 $95,909 $18,278 $618,622 $2,644 $1,04E (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/35) Total $33,057 $134,039 $42,378 $23,238 $98,094 $285,509 $372,633 $1,311,796 $4,970 $2,301 PHOTOS Completed infiltrating Construction of sediment basin. infiltrating sediment (Timing:After)(-2,520 basin. KB) (Timing:During)(-631 /FileResource/DisplayResource/ab7257c8-2bee-4cba-aa80-777cad8e5125) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/75afO51 e-1277-4220-af5e-2cf1128fe614 Previously constructed Publicly-owned parcel water quality opportunity for improvement project stormwater treatment. near Pioneer Tr&US (Timing:Before)(-2,639 Hwy 50. KB) (Timing:Before)(-2,549 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/57563a30-d4c5-490f-bce2-80383bc79472 /FileResource/DisplayResource/22174465-1 faa-4c15-bc87-9153b7fd4dc1 t. Water quality improvement enhancements for additional stormwater retention (Timing:After)(--2,573 KB) /Fi IeResou rce/DisplayResource/36c30207-Of3c-4Ob7-a904-aa2352Oa9eb eWATERSHEDS ■ Upper Truckee River(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/62) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/239 5/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0025-Meyers Stream Environment Zone/Erosion Control Project oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Recreation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThreshoIdCategory/Detail/Recreation) ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/SoilConservation) ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality) o LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Meyers Area Plan(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/1028) oEXTERNAL LINKS Project link.(https://goo.gl/ZbDPAi)0(https://goo.gl/ZbDPAi) NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/239 6/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0033-Flick Point Erosion Control Project-Phase II (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail°/a2f310) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjectList) ` 01.01.01.0033 - Flick Point Erosion Control Project - Phase II (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0033) (https://clarity.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description Water quality improvements and treatment of public right-of-way runoff at Flick Point. •Stage Planning/Design •Planning/Design Start Year 2014 •Implementation Start Year 2021 •Completion Year 2022 •Estimated Total Cost $2,000,000 •Primary Contact Kansas McGahan(kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov(mailto:kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov)) •Added On 06/01/2014 •Last Updated 01/14/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/310 1/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0033-Flick Point Erosion Control Project-Phase II To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. Ti k r. J1�• I�-y' .� �Washoe I State Perk, r' �r Dayton I•.in.g7c.1� 3` n': f� 4 Car.on City a:� Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 39.2306 Longitude: -120.0723 State: CA County/City: Placer County,CA Watershed: Carnelian Canyon ORGANIZATIONS GOrganization OLeadlmplementer 9lmplementer AFunder 0 Primary Contact California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) O Stuart Roll-California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/3) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/3) Placer County,CA(PLCO) Kansas McGahan-Placer County,CA(PLCO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/16) EIP BASICS CQ VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0033) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0033) A EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) A EIP Action Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) A Project 01.01.01.0033-Flick Point Erosion Control Project-Phase II AOld EIP# 865 This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). LAKE CLARITY BASICS ATMDL Pollutant Source Category https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/310 2/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0033-Flick Point Erosion Control Project-Phase II Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire The Urban Stormwater Questionnaire is not relevant because this project is not seeking voter-approved bond funding through the State of California consistent with the Stormwater Resource Plan(SRP). EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES oEIP Performance Measure oSubcategories oExpected Value Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) None miles REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING oEstimated Total Cost $2,000,000 oSecured Funding $0 oUnfunded Need $2,000,000 Funding Sources No funding sources identified for this project. REPORTED EXPENDITURES oFunding Source 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total California Tahoe Conservancy(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/7) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PHOTOS No photos available. A WATERSHEDS ■ Kings Beach(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/12) oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/SoiIConservation) ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality) o LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Placer County Tahoe Basin Area Plan(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/1027) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/310 3/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0033-Flick Point Erosion Control Project-Phase II oEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http!//trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/310 4/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0036-Kings Beach Watershed Improvement Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail°/a2fl54) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjectList) ` 01.01.01.0036 - Kings Beach Watershed Improvement Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0036) (https://clarity.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) (https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description Drainage conveyance stabilization,revegetation,road runoff treatment,and pavement are needed in this project area.This project is intended to address water quality needs in those areas of Kings Beach not included in prior projects or in the Kings Beach Commercial Core Improvement Project. This project is being implemented through different phases including the Coon Street Clean Water Pipe and Lower Chipmunk Project. •Stage Post-Implementation •Planning/Design Start Year 2007 •Implementation Start Year 2015 •Completion Year 2019 •Estimated Total Cost $8,040,000 •Primary Contact Kansas McGahan(kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov(mailto:kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov)) •Added On 06/01/2014 •Last Updated 01/14/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/154 1/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0036-Kings Beach Watershed Improvement Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. I 1N p + i T.tjCF �. t 6532 R � 4 v �I , Way 28 Y Speckled St ?-"6Y o �b co_r�e Cut Thin at A-.-& 7 Dolly Varde n Ave w U SteeIhead Ave Golden Ave ` ngs,Bea h Ra inhox Ave a n 21 y e I N � I -x I I Crystal Bay Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 39.2323 Longitude: -120.0167 State: CA County/City: Placer County,CA Watershed: Kings Beach ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization aLeadlmplementer 01mplementer AFunder 0 Primary Contact California Department of Transportation O Nadarajah(Sutha)Suthahar-California (Caltrans) Department of Transportation(Caltrans) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/2) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/2) California Department of Water Resources O None (California DWR) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/32) North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(NLTRA) G) None (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/30) Placer County,CA(PLCO) Kansas McGahan-Placer County,CA(PLCO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l6) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) O KimberlyCaringer-Tahoe Regional Planning (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/18) Agency(TRPA) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 8) U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin G) Joey Keely-U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) EIP BASICS Q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0036) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0036) 9 EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) 0ElPAction Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 54 2/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0036-Kings Beach Watershed Improvement Project A Project 01.01.01.0036-Kings Beach Watershed Improvement Project LAKE CLARITY BASICS ATMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire The Urban Stormwater Questionnaire is not relevant because this project is not seeking voter-approved bond funding through the State of California consistent with the Stormwater Resource Plan(SRP). TRANSPORTATION BASICS ATransportation Strategy Water Quality(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationStrategy/Detail/3) ATransportation Objective Local Roadway Stormwater(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationObjective/Detail/8) AThis project is on the Federal Transportation Improvement Program(FTIP)list No a Funding Type Capital ACost in Year of Expenditure ESTIMATED BUDGETS rr No budgets have been entered for this project. EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) e Subcategories Property Ownership Road Type Treatment Type 2015 2016 Total Units Placer County Paved Retrofitted 0.5 0.5 miles Total 0 0.5 0.5 miles Linear Feet of Stream Channel Restored or Enhanced(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/7/Overview) A Subcategories Action Performed Watershed 2015 2016 Total Units Enhanced Kings Beach 1,534 1,534 linear feet Total 1,534 0 1,534 linear feet Acres of SEZ Restored or Enhanced(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/9/Overview) A Subcategories Action Performed 2015 2016 Total Units Enhanced 0.5 0.5 acres Total 0.5 0 0.5 acres https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/154 3/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0036-Kings Beach Watershed Improvement Project No accomplishments to report for: Year(s) 2017,2018 Explanation No PMs to report EXPECTED FUNDING eEstimated Total Cost $8,040,000 eSecured Funding $8,062,710 eUnfunded Need ($22,710) ($600,000 identified as eTargeted Funding) Funding Sources e Funding Source eSecured Funding eTargeted Funding Total Placer County General Fund(PLCO)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/55) $100,000 $0 $100,000 U.S.Forest Service(USFS-LTBMU)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/48) $500,000 $600,000 $1,100,000 Unknown or Unassigned(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 168) $7,462,710 $0 $7,462,710 Total $8,062,710 $600,000 $8,662,710 REPORTED EXPENDITURES e Funding Source 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 201 California Department of Water Resources $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $0 $1,070,36 (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/5) North Lake Tahoe Resort Association $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,532 $ (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/25) Placer County General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,920,000 $ (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/55) SHOPP Advance Construction Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $ (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 100) Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act $0 $253,975 $0 $56,142 $0 $0 $560,000 $900,000 $0 $ (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/35) STIP Advance Construction Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $854,609 $400,00 (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/1099) WQ Mitigation Funds $42,085 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/52) Total $42,085 $253,975 $0 $56,142 $0 $0 $560,000 $2,100,000 $2,980,141 $1,470,36 PHOTOS https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/154 4/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0036-Kings Beach Watershed Improvement Project Basin for Coon Street Lower Chipmunk Outfall Clean Water Pipe (Timing:After)(-16,068 (Timing:After)(-82 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/d4e837ee-29d4-4883-ae99-OOa6461fb45d /FileResource/DisplayResource/3dceec4e-7034-42b6-a861-484a5838ad26 Project Sign for Lower Upper Area of Coon Chipmunk Street Water Pipe Project (Timing:During)(-16,863 (Timing:After)(-87 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/4d62fd66-f372-4356-85ba-96041 dc90797) /Fi IeResou rce/DisplayResource/e5332bcc-558a-4626-8b9f-c922df63Oe3b eWATERSHEDS ■ Kings Beach(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/12) ATHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/SoilConservation) ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality) e LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Linking Tahoe-Regional Transportation Plan 2016 Constrained List(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l2) ■ Linking Tahoe Corridor Plan:California SR 89/SR 28(North and West Shores)(North by Northwest) (https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/1017) ■ Placer County Tahoe Basin Area Plan(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/1027) eEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES No notes entered. https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 54 5/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0036-Kings Beach Watershed Improvement Project Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 54 6/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0041 -Tahoe Vista Tamarack Erosion Control Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail°/a2f3l1) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjectList) ` 01.01.01.0041 - Tahoe Vista Tamarack Erosion Control Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0041) (https://clarity.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description Water quality improvements and treatment of public right-of-way runoff in Tahoe Vista. •Stage Planning/Design •Planning/Design Start Year 2019 •Implementation Start Year 2021 •Completion Year 2022 •Estimated Total Cost $1,500,000 •Primary Contact Kansas McGahan(kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov(mailto:kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov)) •Added On 06/01/2014 •Last Updated 05/10/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/311 1/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0041 -Tahoe Vista Tamarack Erosion Control Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. rr. c + G !•J.. �iTri l ae Vista l� Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 39.2425 Longitude: -120.0593 State: CA County/City: Placer County,CA Watershed: Tahoe Vista ORGANIZATIONS GOrganization 0 Lead Implementer olmplementer AFunder 0 Primary Contact California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) O Stuart Roll-California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/3) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/3) Placer County,CA(PLCO) Kansas McGahan-Placer County,CA(PLCO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/16) EIP BASICS CQ VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0041) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0041) A EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) A EIP Action Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) A Project 01.01.01.0041 -Tahoe Vista Tamarack Erosion Control Project This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). LAKE CLARITY BASICS ATMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/311 2/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0041 -Tahoe Vista Tamarack Erosion Control Project The Urban Stormwater Questionnaire is not relevant because this project is not seeking voter-approved bond funding through the State of California consistent with the Stormwater Resource Plan(SRP). EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES eEIP Performance Measure eSubcategories eExpected Value Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) None miles REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING 9Estimated Total Cost $1,500,000 eSecured Funding $0 eUnfunded Need $1,500,000 Funding Sources No funding sources identified for this project. REPORTED EXPENDITURES e Funding Source 2018 Total No expenditures have been reported for this project. PHOTOS No photos available. e WATERSHEDS ■ Tahoe Vista(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/6) eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuaIity) LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Placer County Tahoe Basin Area Plan(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l027) AEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/311 3/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0041 -Tahoe Vista Tamarack Erosion Control Project NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://Sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/311 4/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0045-Fairview/Fairway Phase III Water Quality Improvement Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail°/a2fl13) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjeCtLiSt) ` 01.01.01.0045 - Fairview/Fairway Phase III Water Quality Improvement P... (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0045) (https://clarity.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) (https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description This project includes many small specific areas that were identified for source control and conveyance as part of the Washoe County EIP Project Assessment completed in February of 2006 as well as new water quality treatment areas.These areas are within project boundaries of several completed EIP projects however the improvements proposed by this project were never included as part of the older projects.The old EIP projects are 230A-Fairview Blvd/Country Club Dr.Phase I and 231 D-Fairway Phase III.The December 2009 version of the Pollutant Load Reduction Model was used to select treatment alternatives and prioritize treatment locations. •Stage Completed •Planning/Design Start Year •Implementation Start Year 2009 •Completion Year 2014 •Estimated Total Cost $3,605,000 •Primary Contact Ben Jesch(bjesch@washoecounty.us(mailto:bjesch@washoecounty.us)) eAdded On 06/01/2014 •Last Updated 06/22/2015 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/113 1/5 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0045-Fairview/Fairway Phase III Water Quality Improvement Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. L.I:.• C�a t'IY I,I•!I:i 1. f•- Kin•7=B-�a•:.h L�4,e lahaa .. fJe:.-cl: S•tc z F.II. i arson City Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 39.2661 Longitude: -119.9428 State: NV County/City: Washoe County,NV Watershed: Incline Creek ORGANIZATIONS 00rganization ALeadlmplementer 9lmplementer AFunder 0 Primary Contact Nevada Division of State Lands(NDSL) O Meredith Gosejohan-Nevada Division of State (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l0) Lands(NDSL) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/10) U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin (2) Joey Keely-U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/21) Washoe County,NV(WACO) Ben Jesch-Washoe County,NV(WACO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/25) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/25) EIP BASICS Q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0045) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0045) A EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) A EIP Action Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) A Project 01.01.01.0045-Fairview/Fairway Phase III Water Quality Improvement Project LAKE CLARITY BASICS ATMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/113 2/5 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0045-Fairview/Fairway Phase III Water Quality Improvement Project Urban Stormwater Questionnaire The Urban Stormwater Questionnaire is not relevant because this project is not seeking voter-approved bond funding through the State of California consistent with the Stormwater Resource Plan(SRP). TRANSPORTATION BASICS eTransportation Strategy Water Quality(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationStrategy/Detail/3) eTransportation Objective Local Roadway Stormwater(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationObjective/Detail/8) eThis project is on the Federal Transportation Improvement Program(FTIP)list No 0 Funding Type Capital 0Cost in Year of Expenditure ESTIMATED BUDGETS r� No budgets have been entered for this project. EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) A Subcategories Property Ownership Road Type Treatment Type 2013 Total Units Washoe County Paved Retrofitted 1.8 1.8 miles Total 1.8 1.8 miles No accomplishments to report for: Year(s) 2009,2010,2011,2012,2014 Explanation No improvements were implemented until the 2013 construction date. EXPECTED FUNDING eEstimated Total Cost $3,605,000 eSecured Funding $3,605,000 9Unfunded Need $0 Funding Sources a Funding Source eSecured Funding eTargeted Funding Total Unknown or Unassigned(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 168) $3,605,000 $0 $3,605,000 Total $3,605,000 $0 $3,605,000 https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/113 3/5 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0045-Fairview/Fairway Phase III Water Quality Improvement Project REPORTED EXPENDITURES 0 Funding Source 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act $110,594 $84,588 $43,181 $153,613 $762,511 $115,368 $1,269,855 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/35) Tahoe Bonds Act(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/36) $117,257 $89,711 $45,772 $162,830 $808,262 $122,290 $1,346,122 Total $227,851 $174,299 $88,953 $316,443 $1,570,773 $237,658 $2,615,977 PHOTOS t� Inside the vault of jellyfish Filters installed Jellyfish Filtration System at Divot Court and (Timing:After)(-517 KB) Country Club Drive /FileResource/DisplayResource/021efde7-db8e-46bl-bf74-1d2ef4aedlc6 (Timing: KBring)(-859 /FileResource/DisplayResource/357a2786-cb72-47bf-ba7e-96ed8c01 e28e Jellyfish Filtratiion System vault (Timing:During)(-1,412 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/4c997084-56a4-41 b5-8c21-OcdafOb8e9ea AWATERSHEDS ■ Incline Creek(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detai1/2) ■ Third Creek(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/1) ■ Wood Creek(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detai1/3) eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality) o LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. AEXTERNAL LINKS https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/113 4/5 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0045-Fairview/Fairway Phase III Water Quality Improvement Project No external links entered. NOTES 01/14/2015 11:23 AM Kris Klein The number of Total Miles Treated needs to be confirmed. 01/14/2015 11:22 AM Kris Klein Annual expenditures include all reimbursement requests for time periods that end in the year indicated. 01/14/2015 11:21 AM Kris Klein NDSL funding and expenditure amounts include 3%administrative costs based on the total project cost. 01/14/2015 11:20 AM Kris Klein Secured funding includes$1,855,000 from NDSL and$1,750,000 from USFS. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l13 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0067-CSA#5 Erosion Control Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail°/a2f244) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FUllProjeCtLiSt) ` 01.01.01.0067 - CSA#5 Erosion Control Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0067) (https://clarity.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description The Community Service Area(CSA)#5 Erosion Control Project includes the developed portions of the Tahoe Cedars subdivision southwest of Highway 89 between the El Dorado County Line and Poplar Street.The goal of the Project is to reduce the concentration of fine sediment in the storm water which exits the Project area before reaching Lake Tahoe. •Stage Post-Implementation •Planning/Design Start Year 2011 •Implementation Start Year 2014 •Completion Year 2018 •Estimated Total Cost $1,542,443 •Primary Contact Donaldo Palaroan(donaldo.palarcan@edcgov.us(mailto:donaldo.palarcan@edcgov.us)) •Added On 06/01/2014 •Last Updated 01/29/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/244 1/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0067-CSA#5 Erosion Control Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. Lake BI,d L D[]FiADO ah la Elp.t 62d 7 --gar Pine Point � oQ:mnr� mi 1 O Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 39.0632 Longitude: -120.1345 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: General Creek Info: ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization ALead Implementer Almplementer AFunder 0 Primary Contact California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) 0 Stuart Roll-California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/3) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/3) El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) G) O Donaldo Palaroan-El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/6) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) 0 Kimberly Caringer-Tahoe Regional Planning (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l8) Agency(TRPA) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/18) U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin (2) Joey Keely-U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/21) EIP BASICS 4 VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0067) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0067) A EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) 0 EIP Action Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) A Project 01.01.01.0067-CSA#5 Erosion Control Project LAKE CLARITY BASICS https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/244 2/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0067-CSA#5 Erosion Control Project OTMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire The Urban Stormwater Questionnaire is not relevant because this project is not seeking voter-approved bond funding through the State of California consistent with the Stormwater Resource Plan(SRP). EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES OEIP Performance Measure OSubcategories AExpected Value Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) None miles REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) e Subcategories Property Ownership Road Type Treatment Type 2016 Total Units El Dorado County Paved Retrofitted 9 9 miles Total 9 9 miles No accomplishments to report for: Year(s) 2014,2015,2017,2018 Explanation No performance measures completed during this time. EXPECTED FUNDING AEstimated Total Cost $1,542,443 eSecured Funding $1,542,443 AUnfunded Need $0 Funding Sources e Funding Source eSecured OTargeted Total Funding Funding Local Assessment Funds(ELDO)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1154) $200,000 $0 $200,000 Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act(USFS-LTBMU) $1,262,443 $0 $1,262,443 (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/35) WQ Mitigation Funds(TRPA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/52) $80,000 $0 $80,000 Total $1,542,443 $0 $1,542,443 REPORTED EXPENDITURES e Funding Source 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total California Tahoe Conservancy $0 $0 $68,924 $233,964 $0 $0 $0 $0 $302,888 (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/7) Local Assessment Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $200,000 (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/1 154) Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act $1,419 $24,728 $20,287 $42,995 $233,964 $451,200 $10,403 $4,554 $789,550 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/35) https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/244 3/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0067-CSA#5 Erosion Control Project M,)IVIIL1gdLlUll rU[]Ub W DU W W y4L,77.7 y 1U,000 DU DU Y7L,777 (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/52) Total $1,419 $24,728 $89,211 $276,959 $276,959 $661,200 $10,403 $4,554 $1,345,433 PHOTOS Atrium rack inlet for Construction of AC swale basin on Fourth Street on Antelope Way (Timing:After)(-780 KB) (Timing:During)(-731 /FileResource/DisplayResource/822ed7c5-aO64-4dO4-ab27-7a9f1d8eb637 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/7146368c-74f3-4468-8dc6-129ad b45f24e) Construction of rock El Dorado Street lined channel on (Timing:Before)(-768 Antelope Way KB) (Timing:During)(-2,796 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/5cd1dd85-ef50-46b7-aO5a-44bc5456c3a7 /Fi IeResou rce/DisplayResource/d47b708b-78c2-4bbf-8a2f-6390dc180873 Eroding slope near pipe Eroding slope on 10th,at inlet Alder (Timing:Before)(-2,499 (Timing:Before)(-2,713 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/3b888599-eb8f-4b96-8ce3-05a8193e3bcb /FileResource/DisplayResource/860d573O-Ob82-4e8a-a283-f28313le7648 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/244 4/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0067-CSA#5 Erosion Control Project New block pad for vactor Outfall pipe at end of clean out of Sixth street access road for Waters basin Edge Complex (Timing:After)(-2,466 (Timing:Before)(-1,155 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/98b9f671-d950-4a30-adad-4efeca6b424 /FileResource/DisplayResource/a1977ea8-aeaa-45a4-8e83-9e040e51ef76 Partially buried pipe Road shoulder erosion inlet(s)on Antelope. on Alder,between Opportunity for Antelope and Timber Sediment Trap to Wolf increase inlet and (Timing:Before)(-2,600 trapping capacity. KB) (Timing:Before)(-2,619 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/6210b656-4c2e-4341-bca7-14be85e29682 /FileResource/DisplayResource/9b614119-1 a64-498e-8c25-07f0ff532dd2) AWATERSHEDS ■ General Creek(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/41) ATHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/SoilConservation) ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality) o LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Linking Tahoe-Regional Transportation Plan 2016 Constrained List(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l2) ■ Linking Tahoe Corridor Plan:California SR 89/SR 28(North and West Shores)(North by Northwest) (https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/1017) oEXTERNAL LINKS Project web page(https://www.edcgov.us/government/dot/tahoeengineering/pages/csa5_erosion_control_project.aspx)G (https://www.edcgov.us/govern ment/dot/ta hoeengi neeri ng/pages/csa5_erosion_control_project.aspx) NOTES 01/28/2015 12:40 PM Dan Kikkert This includes CSA#5 Upper Area(Constructed in 2014)and CSA#5 Remainder(to be constructed in 2016/2017) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/244 5/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0067-CSA#5 Erosion Control Project Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/244 6/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0074-Oflyng Water Quality Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3ao/o2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail%2fl393) Project (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjectList) 01.01.01.0074 - Oflyng Water Quality Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/O1.01.01.0074) (https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/index) BASICS A Project Description Urban development in the Oflyng residential area has resulted in a concentrated flow of storm water from the County of El Dorado(County)right-of-way (ROW)directed to pervious forested land as well as the Upper Truckee River.The hydrologic connectivity between Lake Tahoe and the Oflyng area results in a high to moderate potential to deliver fine sediment to Lake Tahoe.Storm water runoff will be directed into infiltration improvements providing a direct reduction in the transport of fine sediment to Lake Tahoe.It is also anticipated that urban storm water infrastructure will be upgraded to current design standards w/conveyance improved to allow for proper flow sizing/routing. A Stage Planning/Design A Planning/Design Start Year 2017 A Implementation Start Year 2020 ACompletion Year 2022 A Estimated Total Cost $1,200,000 A Primary Contact Donaldo Palaroan(donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us(mailto:donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us)) AAdded On 07/16/2014 ALast Updated 01/17/2019 LOCATION https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 393 1/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 01.01.01.0074-Oflyng Water Quality Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. ;{c l Fill 4 a <14-1 G Lake Tahoe �pp Golf Course _ v - 7� �cc. J �1 84 Tahoe y I _ Parediae GoR ^� Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.8633 Longitude: -120.0025 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: Upper Truckee River Info: 95177 ORGANIZATIONS BOrganization ALeadlmplementer 0implementer pFunder O Primary Contact California Department of Water Resources O None (California DWR) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/32) California State Water Resources Control Board Robert Larsen-California State Water Resources (SWRCB) Control Board(SWRCB) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 097) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 097) California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) O Stuart Roll-California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/3) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/3) El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) O Donaldo Palaroan-El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) O Kimberly Caringer-Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 8) (TRPA) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 8) U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Management 19 Joey Keely-U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Unit(USFS-LTBMU) Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) EIP BASICS 4 VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0074) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0074) OElP Focus Area 01-Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) A Ell P Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) A EIP Action Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 393 2/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0074-Oflyng Water Quality Project A Project 01.01.01.0074-Oflyng Water Quality Project This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). LAKE CLARITY BASICS ATMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire Expand Level Collapse Level Search... ❑x Benefit Category >Question Answer Score — Water Quality 2.8 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_................................................................................................................. Fine sediment load reduction(lb/yr) 2200 to 3500 3 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Nitrogen load reduction(lb/yr) 7 to 13 3 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Phosphorous load reduction(lb/yr) 27 to 50 3 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Parcels with stormwater BMPs(number) 3 to 60 2 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Drains to TMDL waterbody Yes 3 ......................................_ .............................................................................................. Provides source control for stormwater pollutant Yes 3 ..................................... _......... .... .... .... ..... .... .... .... . Pollutant load reduction Approved TMDL 5 pollutant ...... ......... .. __ ............................... Volume of stormwater treated(Af/y r) 0.1-0.8 1 Total suspended solid load reduction Ib/ r 5 000-12 000 2 P ( Y) Environment 1 Linear feet of stream channel restored or enhanced )(linear feet 1 to 150 1 Acres of habitat restored or enhanced(acres) 0.1 to 1 1 Community 0.8 .................... Facilities improved or created(number) 1 to 2 1 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_................................................................................................................. Tahoe disadvantaged community(DAC)population served No 0 ..................................... ........................................................................................... Project enhances or creates community areas No 0 ....................................... opportunity ........................................................................................... Employment o ortunit created No 0 ..................................................J....................p...................p........p......�................................ ........................................................................................... Pro'ectim roves property values Yes 3 Flood Management 1 ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-........................................................................._....................................... Volume of stormwater reduced,stored or infiltrated(Af/yr) 0.25 to 1 1 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_................................................................................................................. Proximity to flood-prone channel(miles) 0.3-0.1 3 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_................................................................................................................. Runoff reduced through storage or infiltration Yes,but flooding is 1 not a problem locally ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Impervious area reduced(%) <30 0 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Natural hydrology/hydrograph reestablished No 0 Questionnaire Score:5.6 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES AEIP Performance Measure oSubcategories oExpected Value Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) None miles REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 393 3/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0074-Oflyng Water Quality Project oEstimated Total Cost $1,200,000 ASecured Funding $300,000 oUnfunded Need $900,000 ($900,000 identified as oTargeted Funding) Funding Sources o Funding Source ASecured Funding oTargeted Funding Total Lake Tahoe Restoration Act(USFS-LTBMU)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1159) $0 $900,000 $900,000 Proposition 1 (SWRCB)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1152) $150,000 $0 $150,000 WQ Mitigation Funds(TRPA)(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/52) $150,000 $0 $150,000 Total $300,000 $900,000 $1,200,000 REPORTED EXPENDITURES o Funding Source 2017 2018 Total Proposition 1 (https://laketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/1152) $19,048 $12,149 $31,197 WQ Mitigation Funds(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/52) $11,256 $8,597 $19,853 Total $30,304 $20,746 $51,050 PHOTOS t. S Ofylyng-Failing Slope Outfall at Pioneer Trail- (Timing:Before)(-2,857 drains Crystal Air and KB) Oflyng /FileResource/DisplayResource/75985792-e830-4408-a8ca-a79818d63592 (Timing:KB;re)(-856 /FileResource/DisplayResource/Ob6b8300-ce16-4011-9a34-322d017090ed oWATERSHEDS ■ Upper Truckee River(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/62) oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.orgfThreshoIdCategory/Detail/SoiIConservation) ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.orgfThresholdCategory/DetaiI/WaterQuaIity) o LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 393 4/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0074-Oflyng Water Quality Project @EXTERNAL LINKS Project web page(https://www.edcgov.us/Government/dot[TahoeEngineering/Pages/Oflyng-Water-Quality-Project-.aspx)G (https://www.edcgov.us/Government/dot/TahoeEngi neeri ng/Pages/Oflyng-Water-Qual ity-Project-.aspx) NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectriirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 393 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0086-Bijou Park Creek Watershed and SEZ Restoration Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail%2f2719) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FUllProjeCtLiSt) ` 01.01.01.0086 - Bijou Park Creek Watershed and SEZ Restoration Project This project has an update in progress.Check back later for more current information on this project. (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0086) (https://clarity.Iaketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description The project aims to address water quality and flooding issues in the Lower Bijou Park Creek area(Phase 1),which currently discharges runoff from roadways,commercial and residential area directly into the Ski Run Marina.The area is subject to historic flooding due to undersized and deteriorating infrastructure in this lower watershed area.The project will include restoration of SEZ and associated water quality improvements to reduce sediment and nutrients loads in urban runoff discharged to Lake Tahoe. •Stage Implementation •Planning/Design Start Year 2015 •Implementation Start Year 2017 •Completion Year 2019 •Estimated Total Cost $7,000,000 •Primary Contact Stan Hill(shill@cityofslt.us(mailto:shill@cityofslt.us)) •Added On 10/05/2015 •Last Updated 12/07/2018 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/2719 1/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0086-Bijou Park Creek Watershed and SEZ Restoration Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. 5� ■ �P .r� Fill � Location Information Location Notes Named Area:Bijou Park Lower Watershed project(former Area Type:Watershed Knights Inn/Super 8 hotel) ORGANIZATIONS OOrganization OLead Implementer 9lmplementer AFunder 0 Primary Contact City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) O O Stan Hill-City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/4) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) Commercial Property Owners(Commercial) O Kimberly Caringer-Tahoe Regional Planning (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/33) Agency(TRPA) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 8) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) O KimberlyCaringer-Tahoe Regional Planning (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l8) Agency(TRPA) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 8) EIP BASICS CQ VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0086) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0086) A EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) 0ElPAction Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) A Project 01.01.01.0086-Bijou Park Creek Watershed and SEZ Restoration Project This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). LAKE CLARITY BASICS ATMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/2719 2/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0086-Bijou Park Creek Watershed and SEZ Restoration Project Urban Stormwater Questionnaire Expand Level Collapse Level Search... O Benefit Category )�Question Answer Score — Water Quality 3.4 .................................. ............................................................. Fine sediment load reduction(lb/yr) 4400+ 5 ................................-- _-............................... Nitrogen load reduction(lb/yr) 18+ 5 ................................-- ................................. Phosphorous load reduction(lb/yr) 65+ 5 ..................................... ..................................... Parcels with stormwater BMPs(number) 0 0 ..................................... ..................................... Drains to TMDL waterbody Yes 3 ................................-- _....................................__...................................... Provides source control for stormwater pollutant Yes 3 ......................... .................................. Pollutant load reduction Approved TMDL 5 pollutant ................................. ........................................................................................................................................................................................__ _................................................................. ......... Volume of stormwater treated(Af/yr) 0.7-1.2 2 ................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................--__ ............................................................... Total suspended solid load reduction(lb/yr) 10,000-30,000 3 Environment 1 ....................................................................................-..................... ............................................................ Linear feet of stream channel restored or enhanced(linear feet) 1 to 150 1 ...............................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Acres of habitat restored or enhanced(acres) 0.1 to 1 1 Community 1.2 .............. ___ .................. ...........................................................................................................-........................................................................................... Facilities improved or created(number) 0 0 .................................. ................ ........................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Tahoe disadvantaged community(DAC)population served Yes 3 ................................... ............................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Project enhances or creates community areas No 0 ................................... P Y opportunity ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................-.............................................................. .................. Em to ment o ortunit created No 0 .................................. ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Project improves property values Yes 3 Flood Management 2.2 ............................__ _. ....................... Volume of stormwater reduced,stored or infiltrated(Af/yr) 0.25 to 1 1 ................................-- _.................................. Proximity to flood-prone channel(miles) >1 1 ..............................._- ............................... Runoff reduced through storage or infiltration Yes,major flooding 5 locally .Impervious area reduced(%) 25-45 1 Natural hydrology/hydrograph reestablished Yes 3 Questionnaire Score:7.8 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES 9EIP Performance Measure eSubcategories eExpected Value Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) None miles Acres of SEZ Restored or Enhanced(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/9/Overview) None acres REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Acres of Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquired(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/10/Overview) 2017 2018 Total Units 0 0 0 acres Total 0 0 0 acres EXPECTED FUNDING eEstimated Total Cost $7,000,000 eSecured Funding $465,000 eUnfunded Need $6,535,000 https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/2719 3/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0086-Bijou Park Creek Watershed and SEZ Restoration Project Funding Sources oFunding Source eSecured Funding ATargeted Funding Total City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(CSLT) $165,000 $0 $165,000 (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 0) SEZ Mitigation Funds(TRPA)(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/33) $300,000 $0 $300,000 Total $465,000 $0 $465,000 REPORTED EXPENDITURES OFunding Source 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l0) $0 $140,000 $2,000,000 $13,813 $2,153,813 Commercial Property Owners(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/11) $0 $0 $1,687,000 $0 $1,687,000 SEZ Mitigation Funds(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/33) $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 Total $0 $140,000 $3,687,000 $313,813 $4,140,813 PHOTOS Abatement and Bijou Park Creek flooding demolition of Knights Inn Lloyd Avenue-January 8, (Timing:During)(-2,827 2017 KB) (Timing:Before)(-2,075 /FileResource/DisplayResource/386af58e-7bee-4cb8-9fef-Ob548d2f2557 KB) /Fi IeResource/DisplayResource/cdd98cca-5f2b-4003-9164-4f99da ba439b) Conference Center Demolition of Knights Inn (Timing:Before)(-2,575 (Timing:During)(-1,453 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/8ccbc4a9-5b38-4e1f-ad65-e5ala44b8186J /FileResource/DisplayResource/ef5622ed-Ofda-43f6-ac7e-ca4f4da473d8 91 � f Demolition of Knights Inn Installing SEZ plants on (Timing:During)(-3,234 the site of the former KB) conference center. /FileResource/DisplayResource/563e6dd7-1de8-4f2c-bf11-89d6bd0fc657 (Timing KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/1 e96e28b-955d-434f-8f62-4320aa356c3d https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/2719 4/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0086-Bijou Park Creek Watershed and SEZ Restoration Project Lloyd Avenue CTC New channel in the rear parcels during January 8, of the former Knights Inn 2017 flooding hotel. (Timing:Before)(-70 KB) (Timing:During)(-3,525 /FileResource/DisplayResource/102f0c6b-57f3-46f2-a158-8d7f82125b8d KB) /Fi IeResou rce/DisplayResource/628b7c98-d23c-42ed-bf64-368d b312a415 Mt New wet basin on site of Old conference center former Conference and single-family home Center. (Timing:Before)(-160 (Timing:During)(-4,223 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/053f95c0-b8d6-4eeb-98f5-54fae43f1 e03 /Fi IeResou rce/DisplayResource/2af7790d-3106-4527-a742-68a62b9acfea Rear of Knights Inn hotel View of conference (3/20/2017) center and Lloyd Avenue (Timing:Before)(-2,840 (Timing:Before)(-4,371 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/5c582dbf-888d-4728-bed4-117ca5ad0e79 /FileResource/DisplayResource/c8c73bab-95a1-4bcf-81b1-43dd35496363) View of former View of former conference center and Conference Center Lloyd Avenue. location. (Timing:During)(-3,855 (Timing:During)(-3,972 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/OddO9132-908d-4109-8335-afa721a405f6 /FileResource/DisplayResource/50ea10c6-fbd0-4c11-acbb-7c49ffd1793c View of Lloyd Avenue and rear of Knights Inn (3/21/2017) (Timing:Before)(-2,672 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/54cf79bd-7fac-46c8-ba75-09017e91 cb9b https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/2719 5/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0086-Bijou Park Creek Watershed and SEZ Restoration Project A WATERSHEDS ■ Bijou Park(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/57) oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/SoilConservation) ■ Water Quality(https://threshoIds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuaIity) LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. eEXTERNAL LINKS Project Website(http://www.cityofslt.us/index.aspx?nid=901)G(http://www.cityofslt.us/index.aspx?nid=901) Tahoe Sierra IRWM Project Sheet(2016)(http://tahoesierrairwm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CSLT_Bijou-Park-Creek-SEZ-and-Water- Quality.doc)C(http://tahoesierrairwm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CSLT_Bijou-Park-Creek-SEZ-and-Water-Quality.doc) NOTES 07/22/2016 2:00 PM Jason Burke The project will provide additional benefits that are not currently tracked in this tool(but are requirements for funding sources that prioritize multi-benefit projects and use of stormwater as a resource).As noted in the project description included in the Tahoe Sierra Integrated Regional Water Management Plan(Tahoe Sierra IRWM),the project includes the following additional benefits: -Flood Management(decreased flood risk attained by using distributed infiltration systems to reduce runoff rates and volumes at the source), -Water Supply(augmentation of groundwater through increased infiltration of dry weather and wet weather flows) -Water Quality(increased infiltration to provide runoff treatment,source controls and re-establishing natural drainage hydrology impacted by urban development and hydromodification). Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (mailto:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 I Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/2719 6/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0093-Osgood Basin Expansion (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2fa/02flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail0/02f3763) Project (https:#laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjeCtList) ` 01.01.01.0093 - Osgood Basin Expansion (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0093) (https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS 0Project Description Retrofit of the existing undersized Osgood basin to reduce fine sediment particles and nutrients in a high-priority,directly-connected catchment that discharges direclty into the Ski Run Marina.Expansion of the basin to the east would require a higher berm,and proportionally larger footprint to overcome the challenges with the high groundwater table onsite.Alternative options may include a bypass to the Wildwood basins that would provide additional treatment once the the capacity of the currently undersized Osgood basin is exceeded. Planning and implementation start dates are tentative as the project is currently unfunded. O Stage Planning/Design 0 Plan ning/Design Start Year 2019 0Implementation Start Year 2022 ACompletion Year A Estimated Total Cost $2,000,000 A Primary Contact Stan Hill(shill@cityofslt.us(mailto:shill@cityofslt.us)) AAdded On 01/27/2016 ALast Updated 01/02/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3763 1/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0093-Osgood Basin Expansion To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. y� �J• l V P u Park y n 4 -�6 CLe — ��� }•T �v�.� Location Information Location Notes Named Area:Bijou Park Area Type:Watershed ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization o Lead Implementer olmplementer AFunder oPrimaryContact City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) O O Stan Hill-City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) EIP BASICS 4 VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0093) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0093) O EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) OEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) 0ElPAction Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) A Project 01.01.01.0093-Osgood Basin Expansion This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). LAKE CLARITY BASICS OTMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire Expand Level Collapse Level Search... O Benefit Category >Question' Answer Score — Water Quality 3.2 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Fine sediment load reduction(lb/yr) 3100 to 4900 4 https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3763 2/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0093-Osgood Basin Expansion .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-........................................................................._....................................... Nitrogen load reduction(lb/yr) 11 to 20 4 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._........................................................................._....................................... Phosphorous load reduction(lb/yr) 45 to 70 4 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._........................................................................._....................................... Parcels with stormwater BMPs(number) 0 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._........................................................................._....................................... Drains to TMDL waterbody Yes 3 ................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................._........................................................................._....................................... Provides source control for stormwater pollutant No 0 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._............................................................................................................... Pollutant load reduction Approved TMDL 5 pollutant .............................. -.. ................................................................................ Volume of stormwater treated(Af/yr) >1.9 5 ................................ .-.. ............................................ Total suspended solid load reduction(lb/yr) 25,000-50,000 4 Environment 0.5 .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Linear feet of stream channel restored or enhanced(linear feet) 0 0 ..................... ........................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Acres of habitat restored or enhanced(acres) 0.1 to 1 1 — Community 1.2 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Facilities improved or created(number) 0 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Tahoe disadvantaged community(DAC)population served Yes 3 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Project enhances or creates community areas No 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Employment opportunity created Short-term 3 .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Project improves property values No 0 Flood Management 1.2 ................................................................. ......................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Volume of stormwater reduced,stored or infiltrated(Af/yr) 0.25 to 1 1 ...................................................... ................................................................................ Proximity to flood-prone channel(miles) >1 1 .......................................... .. .. .. ......................................... Runoff reduced through storage or infiltration Yes,but flooding is 1 not a problem locally ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Impervious area reduced(%) <30 0 .............................. ............................................................................. Natural hydrology/hydrograph reestablished Yes 3 Questionnaire Score:6.1 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES AEIP Performance Measure ASubcategories 0Expected Value Acres Treated for Invasive Species [Invasive Species Type: acres (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/l S/Overview) Aquatic] REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING 0 Estimated Total Cost $2,000,000 ASecured Funding $0 OUnfunded Need $2,000,000 Funding Sources No funding sources identified for this project. REPORTED EXPENDITURES 9 Funding Source 2018 Total https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3763 3/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0093-Osgood Basin Expansion City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l0) $0 $0 Total $0 $0 PHOTOS �t Existing Osgood SEZ area Osgood Exppansion (Timing:Before)(-1,011 Conceptual Lay out KB) (Timing:Before)(-1,987 /FileResource/DisplayResource/c8dfcf36-6be4-49aa-b5a3-3cc9a5937135) KB) /FileResou rce/DisplayResource/c577f124-c7f7-47fa-b972-d 10ed3cadc Wildwood basins (Timing:Before)(-2,297 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/c80c3b34-5e3a-4277-af23-fl44f35636bd AWATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. ATHRESHOLD CATEGORIES No Threshold Categories set for this project. eLOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. eEXTERNAL LINKS City Pollutant Load Reduction Plan and Long-term Pollutant Load Reduction Strategy(http://www.cityofslt.us/DocumentCenter/View/6454)G (http://www.cityofslt.us/DocumentCenterNiew/6454) NOTES https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3763 4/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0093-Osgood Basin Expansion 02/04/2016 11:13 AM Jason Burke The Osgood basin expansion was identified in the 2012 Conceptual Project Layouts for Potential Near-Term Water quality Improvements report prepared for the City by NHC Consultants.The report noted the basin is undersized given the size,volume and estimated annual average load from catchments draining to the system.The expansion of the Osgood basin combined with re-routing of bypass flows to the Wildwood basins would provide additional treatment before discharge to Lake Tahoe.This project will be included for consideration in the City's 2016-2021 PLRP. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (mai Ito:trpa@trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3763 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0094-Upper Keller Canyon Drainage and Erosion Control Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2fa/02flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail0/02f3764) Project (https:#laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjeCtList) ` 01.01.01.0094 - Upper Keller Canyon Drainage and Erosion Control Proje... (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0094) (https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS 0Project Description Steep eroding slopes,road cuts and concentrated drainage into unprotected road shoulders result in significant erosion and drainage issues in steep,erosion prone slopes and creates flooding and drainage issues for residents.The water quality,drainage and erosion control project that address steep eroding slopes,stabilize road shoulders and reduce erosion in areas of concentrated flows.Existing site conditions include inadequate rock lined channels on steep slopes that are overwhelmed during high intensity storm recurrences.Project work will include adding in additional storm drain inlets,adding subsurface storm drain pipes that will connect rock-lined channels,and constructing basin O Stage Planning/Design 0 Plan ning/Design Start Year 2015 0Implementation Start Year 2021 ACompletion Year 2023 AEstimated Total Cost $4,000,000 0Primary Contact Stan Hill(shill@cityofslt.us(mailto:shill@cityofslt.us)) AAdded On 01/27/2016 ALast Updated 01/02/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3764 1/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0094-Upper Keller Canyon Drainage and Erosion Control Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. C;e'y S rw t y Sti�i,�1u^.4c1 i a• � I k;J Location Information Location Notes Named Area:Bijou Park see detailed location Area Type:Watershed ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization 0 Lead Implementer 9lmplementer AFunder oPrimaryContact City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) O O Stan Hill-City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) EIP BASICS 4 VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0094) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0094) O EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) OEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) 0ElPAction Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) A Project 01.01.01.0094-Upper Keller Canyon Drainage and Erosion Control Project This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). LAKE CLARITY BASICS OTMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire Expand Level Collapse Level Search... O Benefit Category >Question' Answer Score — Water Quality 1.8 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Fine sediment load reduction(lb/yr) 1 to 1000 1 https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3764 2/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0094-Upper Keller Canyon Drainage and Erosion Control Project .................................... ............................................................. Nitrogen load reduction(lb/yr) 1 to 5 1 .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Phosphorous load reduction(lb/yr) 1 to 18 1 .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Parcels with stormwater BMPs(number) 0 0 .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Drains to TMDL waterbody Yes 3 ............................... .................................................................................................... Provides source control for stormwater pollutant Yes 3 .............................. .............................................. Pollutant load reduction Approved TMDL 5 pollutant ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Volume of stormwater treated(Af/yr) 0.1-0.8 1 ................................. ......................................................................... Total suspended solid load reduction(lb/yr) 750-6,000 1 Environment 0.5 .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._........................................................................._....................................... Linear feet of stream channel restored or enhanced(linear feet) 1 to 150 1 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-........................................................................._....................................... Acres of habitat restored or enhanced(acres) 0 0 — Community 2 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Facilities improved or created(number) 1 to 2 1 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Tahoe disadvantaged community(DAC)population served No 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Project enhances or creates community areas Yes 3 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Employment opportunity created Short-term 3 .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Project improves property values Yes 3 Flood Management 1.8 ................................................................. ......................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Volume of stormwater reduced,stored or infiltrated(Af/yr) 0.25 to 1 1 ...................................................... .......................................................................................................-......................................... ................................. Proximity to flood-prone channel(miles) 0.75-0.25 2 .......................................... .. .. .. ............................................-................................................................._-----.................................... Runoff reduced through storage or infiltration Yes,minor flooding 3 locally .............................. < .............................. Impervious area reduced(%) 30 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-........................................................................._....................................... Natural hydrology/hydrograph reestablished Yes 3 Questionnaire Score:6.1 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING 0 Estimated Total Cost $4,000,000 ASecured Funding $0 OUnfunded Need $4,000,000 Funding Sources No funding sources identified for this project. REPORTED EXPENDITURES O Funding Source 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l0) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3764 3/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 1 01.01.01.0094-Upper Keller Canyon Drainage and Erosion Control Project PHOTOS No photos available. eWATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES No Threshold Categories set for this project. e LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. eEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (m a i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3764 4/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0095-Ruby Way Overlook Ct. (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2fa/02flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail0/02f3765) Project (https:#laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjeCtList) ` 01.01.01.0095 - Ruby Way Overlook Ct. (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0095) (https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS 0Project Description Water quality and erosion control project that will address surface runoff conditions.Existing site conditions include an undersized storm drain collection and conveyance system that is overwhelmed during high intensity storms.Project work will include adding in additional storm drain inlets,adding subsurface storm drain pipes that will connect to an under-utilized rock-lined channel,and constructing a series of linear storm drain detention basins that will also allow infiltration of stormwater.Project improvements will redirect urban stormwater runoff into existing surface and subsurface conveyance systems;thereby,removing overland surface flow that is causing significant O Stage Planning/Design 0 Plan ning/Design Start Year 2015 0Implementation Start Year 2020 ACompletion Year 2020 AEstimated Total Cost $700,000 0Primary Contact Stan Hill(shill@cityofslt.us(mailto:shill@cityofslt.us)) AAdded On 01/27/2016 ALast Updated 01/02/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3765 1/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0095-Ruby Way Overlook Ct. To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. +ou Fark.,' , r. 40 'as. 01 Location Information Location Notes Named Area:Bijou Park Primary goal involves routing Area Type:Watershed more stormwater down the old Wildwood Avenue right-of-way to reduce stormwater flowing to Ruby Way.Work will involve constructing new drainage inlets and storm drain pipe along ORGANIZATIONS oOrganization oLead Implementer 0implementer OFunder oPrimaryContact City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) O O Stan Hill-City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) EIP BASICS CL VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0095) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0095) OEIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) OEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) 0 El P Action Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) 0 Project 01.01.01.0095-Ruby Way Overlook Ct. This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). LAKE CLARITY BASICS OTMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoe!nfo.org/ResuIts/DetaiI/UrbanUpIands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3765 2/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0095-Ruby Way Overlook Ct. Expand Level Collapse Level Search... x Benefit Category )�Question Answer Score Water Quality 2.7 ......_. ......... ._..... .................. Fine sediment load reduction(lb/yr) 2200 to 3500 3 .............................. .................................. Nitrogen load reduction(lb/yr) 7 to 13 3 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Phosphorous load reduction(lb/yr) 27 to 50 3 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Parcels with stormwater BMPs(number) 0 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Drains to TMDL waterbody Yes 3 ................................... ................................................................................................. Provides source control for stormwater pollutant Yes 3 .................................... ....................................................... Pollutant load reduction Approved TMDL 5 pollutant ............................... ...... ................................ Volume of stormwater treated(Af/yr) 0.7-1.2 2 ................................. ... ................................ Total suspended solid load reduction(lb/yr) 5,000-12,000 2 Environment 0 .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._........................................................................._....................................... Linear feet of stream channel restored or enhanced(linear feet) 0 0 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._....................................... Acres of habitat restored or enhanced(acres) 0 0 — Community 2.6 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Facilities improved or created(number) 1 to 2 1 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Tahoe disadvantaged community(DAC)population served Yes 3 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Project enhances or creates community areas Yes 3 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Employment opportunity created Short-term 3 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Project improves property values Yes 3 Flood Management 2.2 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Volume of stormwater reduced,stored or infiltrated(Af/yr) 0.25 to 1 1 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Proximity to flood-prone channel(miles) 0.75-0.25 2 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Runoff reduced through storage or infiltration Yes,major flooding 5 locally .............................. < ............................. Impervious area reduced(%) 30 0 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._....................................... Natural hydrology/hydrograph reestablished Yes 3 Questionnaire Score:7.5 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING 9 Estimated Total Cost $700,000 ASecured Funding $194,323 OUnfunded Need $505,677 Funding Sources 0 Funding Source 9Secured Funding ATargeted Funding Total Proposition 1 (SWRCB)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 152) $194,323 $0 $194,323 Total $194,323 $0 $194,323 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3765 3/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0095-Ruby Way Overlook Ct. REPORTED EXPENDITURES eFundingSource 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l0) $1,000 $500 $1,000 $0 $2,500 Total $1,000 $500 $1,000 $0 $2,500 PHOTOS �l Eroding channel Erosion and flooding discharging sediment impacts to affordable onto Ruby Way:2/8/2016 housing along Pioneer (Timing:Before)(-2,607 Trail:11/10/2008 KB) (Timing:Before)(-171 (/FileResource/DisplayResource/4ccfl75f-3bbe-4295-bac8-f2e4fb2fdlec KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/912744ff-79a6-4ea5-b767-8ebf1 dde3fbb ■ Sediment discharge to Sonora Avenue road Ruby Way shoulder condition (Timing:Before)(-2,599 (Timing:Before)(-3,376 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/4cl7O66b-dO77-4d6O-af5d-4a7O2815COcb) /FileResource/DisplayResource/c8339714-1919-488b-ad2c-ldeaceflcc4b eWATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES No Threshold Categories set for this project. eLOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. eEXTERNAL LINKS https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3765 4/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0095-Ruby Way Overlook Ct. 2016 IRWM Project Sheet(http://tahoesierrairwm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CSLT_Ruby_Way-Overlook_Court1.doc)0(http://ta hoesierrairwm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CSLT_Ruby_Way-overlook_Courtl.doc) NOTES 04/29/2016 2:27 PM Jason Burke The project will provide additional benefits that are not currently tracked in this tool(but are requirements for funding sources that prioritize multi-benefit projects and use of stormwater as a resource).As noted in the project description included in the Tahoe Sierra Integrated Regional Water Management Plan(Tahoe Sierra IRWM),the project includes the following additional benefits: -Flood Management(decreased flood risk attained by using distributed infiltration systems to reduce runoff rates and volumes at the source), -Water Supply(augmentation of groundwater through increased infiltration of dry weather and wet weather flows) -Community Mobility(address existing drainage issues that impact the future alignment of the South Tahoe Greenway,EIP#03.01.02.0088) -Water Quality(increased infiltration to provide runoff treatment,source controls and re-establishing natural drainage hydrology impacted by urban development and hydromodification). Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version ofthe EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (mai Ito:trpa@trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 I Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34,04 https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3765 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0096-Bijou Area Water Quality Improvement Project, Phases 2 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f0/02flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail0/02f3769) Project (https:#laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjeCtList) ` 01.01.01.0096 - Bijou Area Water Quality Improvement Project, Phases 2... (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0096) (https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS 0Project Description Stabilize roadside shoulders as a means of sediment source control to protect the newly constructed Bijou ECP Phase 1 infiltration basins. Provide distributed infiltration as a form of hydrologic source control,acquire easements and install overflow conveyances where localized flooding results in excessive sediment tracking onto City road network,in order to improve roadway sweeping effectiveness and source control. e Stage Planning/Design A Planning/Design Start Year 2015 Almplementation Start Year 2020 ACompletion Year 2025 AEstimated Total Cost $1,000,000 A Primary Contact Stan Hill(shill@cityofslt.us(mailto:shill@cityofslt.us)) AAdded On 01/27/2016 ALast Updated 01/02/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3769 1/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0096-Bijou Area Water Quality Improvement Project, Phases 2 To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. v1 ' ga`aQ ys se ?,:h Ave nJ �7ye aC cn r 2 ti F'a � y Pia �a Bijou Municip Goff Cour aa� G Bijou �d 0—ni[y C7 Park v Lake Tahoe - Co—niry College Location Information Location Notes Named Area:Bijou Creek Area Type:Watershed ORGANIZATIONS oOrganization o Lead Implementer olmplementer oFunder oPrimaryContact City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) O O Stan Hill-City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) EIP BASICS 4 VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0096) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0096) A EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) OEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) 0ElPAction Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) o Project 01.01.01.0096-Bijou Area Water Quality Improvement Project,Phases 2 This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). LAKE CLARITY BASICS OTMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire Expand Level Collapse Level Search... Benefit Category >Question Answer Score — Water Quality 2.7 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Fine sediment load reduction(lb/yr) 2200 to 3500 3 https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3769 2/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0096-Bijou Area Water Quality Improvement Project, Phases 2 .................................... .................................................................... Nitrogen load reduction(lb/yr) 7 to 13 3 .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Phosphorous load reduction(lb/yr) 27 to 50 3 ............................... -................................................................................................................. Parcels with stormwater BMPs(number) 0 0 ............................... -................................................................................................................. Drains to TMDL waterbody Yes 3 ............................... .................................................................................................... Provides source control for stormwater pollutant Yes 3 .............................. .............................................. Pollutant load reduction Approved TMDL 5 pollutant ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................. Volume of stormwater treated(Af/yr) 0.7-1.2 2 ................................. .................................. Total suspended solid load reduction(lb/yr) 5,000-12,000 2 Environment 0 .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._........................................................................._....................................... Linear feet of stream channel restored or enhanced(linear feet) 0 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-........................................................................._....................................... Acres of habitat restored or enhanced(acres) 0 0 — Community 2.6 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Facilities improved or created(number) 1 to 2 1 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Tahoe disadvantaged community(DAC)population served Yes 3 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Project enhances or creates community areas Yes 3 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Employment opportunity created Short-term 3 .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Project improves property values Yes 3 Flood Management 2.4 ................................................................. ......................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Volume of stormwater reduced,stored or infiltrated(Af/yr) 0.75 to 1.5 2 ...................................................... .......................................................................................................-............................................................................... Proximity to flood-prone channel(miles) 0.75-0.25 2 .......................................... .. .. .. ............................................-................................................................................................................. Runoff reduced through storage or infiltration Yes,major flooding 5 locally .............................. < ............................. Impervious area reduced(%) 30 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-......................................................................................................... Natural hydrology/hydrograph reestablished Yes 3 Questionnaire Score:7.7 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING 0 Estimated Total Cost $1,000,000 ASecured Funding $0 OUnfunded Need $1,000,000 Funding Sources No funding sources identified for this project. REPORTED EXPENDITURES O Funding Source 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l0) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3769 3/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 01.01.01.0096-Bijou Area Water Quality Improvement Project, Phases 2 PHOTOS Ilk Inadequate road Inadequate road drainage and road drainage impacts ability shoulder stabilization- to use achieve TMDL roadwayflooding Road RAM scores- impacts ability to achieve Glenwood Way TMDL Road RAM scores (Timing:Before)(-3,883 (Timing:Before)(-3,317 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/9a4fd29f-4bb9-4a17-8c88-fb9c68f96898 /FileResource/DisplayResource/79c6e6d1-5fcd-48d3-9dd1-70711 dc9a96d Yk Road condition impacts Road shoulder erosion from inadequate (Red Lake Road/Walkup drainage and need for Road) source control- (Timing:Before)(-2,281 Glenwood Way KB) (Timing:Before)(-3,135 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/8dl56c73-5eO6-491 c-bec5-bfc53fbb7b2 /FileResource/DisplayResource/Ofebdc80-a02d-41 b5-9a45-11 cadb7e29bd AWATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES No Threshold Categories set for this project. eLOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. eEXTERNAL LINKS 2016 IRWM project sheet(http://tahoesierrairwm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CSLT_Bijou-Creek-Upper-Glenwood.doc)C' (http://tahoesierrairwm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CSLT_Bijou-Creek-Upper-Glenwood.doc) NOTES https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3769 4/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0096-Bijou Area Water Quality Improvement Project, Phases 2 No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (m a i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3769 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0097-Chiapa Water Quality Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://laketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetaiI%2f3770) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FUllProjeCtLiSt) ` 01.01.01.0097 - Chiapa Water Quality Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0097) (https://clarity.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description The Chiapa Water Quality Project(Project)encompasses the Tahoe Paradise Unit No.34 subdivision,which includes Chiapa Drive,Tolteca Court,and Taos Court.The primary goal of the Project is to improve the clarity of Lake Tahoe by reducing detrimental water quality impacts that are a result of the development of Tahoe Paradise Unit No.34.The objective of the Project is the reduction of the transport of fine sediment from the Project area to the Upper Truckee River by construction water quality Best Management Practices(BMPs).(This project was previously approved as an EIP project under the old EIP Number#707.) •Stage Deferred •Planning/Design Start Year 2019 •Implementation Start Year 2021 •Completion Year 2022 •Estimated Total Cost $2,083,600 •Primary Contact Donaldo Palaroan(donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us(mailto:donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us)) •Added On 02/01/2016 •Last Updated 03/18/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3770 1/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0097-Chiapa Water Quality Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. x O _ pQ y c `T+ _ N GQ h P Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.8457 Longitude: -120.0343 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: Upper Truckee River Info: 95174 ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization ALead Implementer Almplementer AFunder 0 Primary Contact El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) Donaldo Palaroan-El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/6) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) O Kimberly Caringer-Tahoe Regional Planning (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l8) Agency(TRPA) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/18) EIP BASICS Q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0097) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0097) A EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) A EIP Action Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) A Project 01.01.01.0097-Chiapa Water Quality Project LAKE CLARITY BASICS ATMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3770 2/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0097-Chiapa Water Quality Project Expand Level Collapse Level Search... 0 Benefit Category ),Question Answer Score Water Quality 3 ............................... Fine sediment load reduction(lb/yr) 2200 to 3500 3 .................................... .................................... Nitrogen load reduction(lb/yr) 7 to 13 3 ..................................... ................................................................................ Phosphorous load reduction(lb/yr) 27 to 50 3 ................................... ........................................................................... Parcels with stormwater BMPs(number) 50 to 130 3 ...............................-- __........ ........ ........... ...... Drains to TMDL waterbody Yes 3 ......................... ........................ Provides source control for stormwater pollutant Yes 3 ................................... ............................................................................................................ .................................................._.. Pollutant load reduction Approved TMDL 5 pollutant ................................... ( Y) ................................................................................................................................................................................................ ................................................ Volume of stormwater treated Af/ r 0.7-1.2 2 .................................... p .y................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................ Total suspended solid load reduction(lb/ r) 5,000-12,000 2 Environment 0.5 ... .... ..... ..... ....................................................................................... ............. Linear feet of stream channel restored or enhanced(linear feet) 0 0 ..................................................................................................................-................................................................ Acres of habitat restored or enhanced(acres) 0.1 to 1 1 Community 1.2 Facilities improved or created(number) 0 0 ................................... .....................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Tahoe disadvantaged community(DAC)population served Yes 3 .................................. .......................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Project enhances or creates community areas No 0 .................................. ........................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Employment opportunity created No 0 ................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................................................................. Project improves property values Yes 3 Flood Management 0.8 ............ ............................................................ Volume of stormwater reduced,stored or infiltrated(Af/yr) 0.25 to 1 1 ..................................... .............................................................................. Proximity to flood-prone channel(miles) 0.75-0.25 2 ..................................... ................................................... Runoff reduced through storage or infiltration Yes,but flooding is 1 not a problem locally Impervious area reduced(%) <30 0 Natural hydrology/hydrograph reestablished No 0 Questionnaire Score:5.5 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No annual performance measure accomplishments entered for this project. EXPECTED FUNDING OEstimated Total Cost $2,083,600 ASecured Funding $25,000 AUnfunded Need $2,058,600 ($2,058,600 identified as ATargeted Funding) Funding Sources 0 Funding Source ASecured Funding ATargeted Funding Total Proposition 1 (SWRCB)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 152) $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Unknown or Unassigned(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 168) $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 WQ Mitigation Funds(TRPA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/52) $25,000 $58,600 $83,600 https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3770 3/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 1 01.01.01.0097-Chiapa Water Quality Project Total $25,000 $2,058,600 $2,083,600 REPORTED EXPENDITURES oFunding Source 2018 Total No expenditures have been reported for this project. PHOTOS No photos available. oWATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES No Threshold Categories set for this project. o LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. oEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3770 4/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0097-Chiapa Water Quality Project https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3770 5/5 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0098-Delaware Water Quality Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2fa/02flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail0/02f3771) Project (https:#laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjeCtList) ` 01.01.01.0098 - Delaware Water Quality Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0098) (https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS 0Project Description The Delaware Water Quality Project(Project)encompasses the Tahoe Paradise Units No.20,22,23,and 24 subdivisions,which includes Delaware Street,Kiowa Drive,and Kickapoo Street.The primary goal of the Project is to improve the clarity of Lake Tahoe by reducing detrimental water quality impacts that are a result of the development of Tahoe Paradise Units No.20,22,23,and 24.The objective of the Project is the reduction of the transport of fine sediment from the Project area to the Upper Truckee River by construction water quality Best Management Practices(BMPs). (Previously El#194) O Stage Deferred A Planning/Design Start Year 2020 0Implementation Start Year 2021 ACompletion Year 2022 AEstimated Total Cost $1,000,000 A Primary Contact Donaldo Palaroan(donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us(mailto:donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us)) AAdded On 02/01/2016 ALast Updated 02/09/2016 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3771 1/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0098-Delaware Water Quality Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. nJ M1:1in•:I•.n S:,utl,L ik� •:;�r•:liiar:illy 1'ahi T. a•r.� •n L 76(r t:�••. Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.8626 Longitude: -120.0333 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: Upper Truckee River ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization 0 Lead Implementer Almplementer AFunder APrimaryContact El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) O Donaldo Palaroan-El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) EIP BASICS q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0098) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0098) AEIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) 0ElPAction Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) e Project 01.01.01.0098-Delaware Water Quality Project LAKE CLARITY BASICS OTMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire The Urban Stormwater Questionnaire is not relevant because this project is not seeking voter-approved bond funding through the State of California consistent with the Stormwater Resource Plan(SRP). https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3771 2/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0098-Delaware Water Quality Project EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No annual performance measure accomplishments entered for this project. EXPECTED FUNDING AEstimated Total Cost $1,000,000 ASecured Funding $0 AUnfunded Need $1,000,000 Funding Sources No funding sources identified for this project. REPORTED EXPENDITURES A Funding Source 2018 Total No expenditures have been reported for this project. PHOTOS No photos available. AWATERSHEDS ■ Upper Truckee River(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/62) eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/SoilConservation) ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality) A LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. eEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3771 3/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0098-Delaware Water Quality Project NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (m a i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3771 4/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0099-Glenridge Water Quality Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2fa/02flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail0/02f3772) Project (https:#laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjeCtList) ` 01.01.01.0099 - Glenridge Water Quality Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0099) (https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS 0Project Description The Glenridge Water Quality Project(Project)encompasses the Glenridge Park Units No.1 &2 subdivisions,which includes Northridge Drive, Glenridge Parkway,and Sunnyview Drive.The primary goal of the Project is to improve the clarity of Lake Tahoe by reducing detrimental water quality impacts that are a result of the development of Glenridge Park Units No.1 &2.The objective of the Project is the reduction of the transport of fine sediment from the Project area to Lake Tahoe by construction water quality Best Management Practices(BMPs).(Previously EIP#712) A Stage Deferred A Planning/Design Start Year 2020 0Implementation Start Year 2021 ACompletion Year 2022 AEstimated Total Cost $800,000 A Primary Contact Donaldo Palaroan(donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us(mailto:donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us)) AAdded On 02/01/2016 ALast Updated 02/09/2016 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3772 1/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0099-Glenridge Water Quality Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. + 1•,i11•J:F m-'h L ke l Ne:, r t , [Jr .aise. \ ¢� R South Lake 1'ahi e Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 39.0444 Longitude: -120.124 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: Meeks Creek ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization 0 Lead Implementer Almplementer AFunder APrimaryContact El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) O Donaldo Palaroan-El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) EIP BASICS q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0099) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0099) AEIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) 0ElPAction Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) e Project 01.01.01.0099-Glenridge Water Quality Project LAKE CLARITY BASICS OTMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire The Urban Stormwater Questionnaire is not relevant because this project is not seeking voter-approved bond funding through the State of California consistent with the Stormwater Resource Plan(SRP). https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3772 2/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0099-Glenridge Water Quality Project EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No annual performance measure accomplishments entered for this project. EXPECTED FUNDING oEstimated Total Cost $800,000 oSecured Funding $0 oUnfunded Need $800,000 Funding Sources No funding sources identified for this project. REPORTED EXPENDITURES A Funding Source 2018 Total No expenditures have been reported for this project. PHOTOS No photos available. oWATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES No Threshold Categories set for this project. o LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. oEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3772 3/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0099-Glenridge Water Quality Project NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (m a i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3772 4/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0100-San Bernardino Water Quality Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2fa/o2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail0/02f3773) Project (https:#laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjeCtList) ` 01.01.01.0100 - San Bernardino Water Quality Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0100) (https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS 0Project Description The San Bernardino Water Quality Project(Project)encompasses the Tahoe Paradise Units No.20,26,28,and 30 subdivisions,which includes San Bernardino Avenue,Normuk Street,and Oaxaco Street.The primary goal of the Project is to improve the clarity of Lake Tahoe by reducing detrimental water quality impacts that are a result of the development of Tahoe Paradise Units No.20,26,28,and 30.The objective of the Project is the reduction of the transport of fine sediment from the Project area to the Upper Truckee River by construction water quality Best Management Practices(BMPs).(Previously EIP#194) O Stage Deferred A Planning/Design Start Year 2019 0Implementation Start Year 2020 ACompletion Year 2021 AEstimated Total Cost $1,000,000 A Primary Contact Donaldo Palaroan(donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us(mailto:donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us)) AAdded On 03/02/2017 ALast Updated 06/09/2017 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3773 1/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0100-San Bernardino Water Quality Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. �--Lldh Lake 10376 IT r . �� � •��-r. ti. i Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.856 Longitude: -120.0328 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: Upper Truckee River ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization 0 Lead Implementer Almplementer AFunder APrimaryContact El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) O Donaldo Palaroan-El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) EIP BASICS q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0100) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0100) AEIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) 0ElPAction Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) e Project 01.01.01.0100-San Bernardino Water Quality Project LAKE CLARITY BASICS OTMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire The Urban Stormwater Questionnaire is not relevant because this project is not seeking voter-approved bond funding through the State of California consistent with the Stormwater Resource Plan(SRP). https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3773 2/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0100-San Bernardino Water Quality Project EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No annual performance measure accomplishments entered for this project. EXPECTED FUNDING oEstimated Total Cost $1,000,000 oSecured Funding $0 oUnfunded Need $1,000,000 Funding Sources No funding sources identified for this project. REPORTED EXPENDITURES A Funding Source 2018 Total No expenditures have been reported for this project. PHOTOS No photos available. oWATERSHEDS ■ Upper Truckee River(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/62) oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES No Threshold Categories set for this project. o LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. oEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3773 3/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0100-San Bernardino Water Quality Project NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (m a i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3773 4/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0103-South Upper Truckee Water Quality Project (https://laketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://laketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetaiI%2f3784) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FUllProjeCtLiSt) ` 01.01.01.0103 - South Upper Truckee Water Quality Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0103) (https://clarity.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description The South Upper Truckee Water Quality Project(Project)encompasses Tahoe Paradise Unit 60,River Park Estates Units 1 &2,and South Gate Subdivisions.This includes the neighborhoods off of South Upper Truckee Road,bordered by US 50 to the north,the Upper Truckee River to the south and east,and USFS owned parcels to the west.The primary goal of the Project is to improve the clarity of Lake Tahoe by reducing detrimental water quality impacts that are a result of the development of the subdivisions,including the reduction of the transport of fine sediment from the Project area to the Upper Truckee River by construction of appropriate water quality BMPs. •Stage Planning/Design •Planning/Design Start Year 2010 •Implementation Start Year 2020 •Completion Year 2022 •Estimated Total Cost $1,500,000 •Primary Contact Donaldo Palaroan(donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us(mailto:donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us)) eAdded On 05/13/2016 •Last Updated 01/02/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3784 1/5 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0103-South Upper Truckee Water Quality Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. J + 89 I a N O 4 L �rP P� IrJh w�y.9p Sanrsv��p k d5 e p r. C. 4 Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.8378 Longitude: -120.0244 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: Upper Truckee River Info: ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization ALead Implementer Almplementer OFunder 0 Primary Contact El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) Donaldo Palaroan-El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/6) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) O Kimberly Caringer-Tahoe Regional Planning (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l8) Agency(TRPA) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/18) U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin O Joey Keely-U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/21) EIP BASICS Q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0103) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0103) A EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) AEIP Action Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) 0Project 01.01.01.0103-South Upper Truckee Water Quality Project This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3784 2/5 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0103-South Upper Truckee Water Quality Project LAKE CLARITY BASICS ATMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) Urban Stormwater Questionnaire Expand Level Collapse Level Search... O Benefit Category >Question Answer Score ♦ Water Quality 4 ♦ Environment 2 ♦ Community 1.4 ♦ Flood Management 2.2 Questionnaire Score:9.6 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES AEIP Performance Measure eSubcategories AExpected Value Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) None miles Miles of Street Sweeping(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/6/Overview) None miles Acres of SEZ Restored or Enhanced(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/9/Overview) None acres REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING OEstimated Total Cost $1,500,000 A Secured Funding $0 AUnfunded Need $1,500,000 ($1,500,000 identified as ATargeted Funding) Funding Sources 0 Funding Source ASecured ATargeted Total Funding Funding Lake Tahoe Restoration Act(USFS-LTBMU) $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/1 159) Total $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 REPORTED EXPENDITURES A Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total SEZ Mitigation Funds(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/33) $65,271 $121 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,125 $0 $0 $73,517 Total $65,271 $121 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,125 $0 $0 $73,517 PHOTOS https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3784 3/5 8/16/2019 LT Info 01.01.01.0103-South Upper Truckee Water Quality Project A ' r Along Elati Street,bare Near intersection of roadside ditches South Upper Truckee Rd (Timing:Before)(-128 &Kekin St,outfall pipe KB) discharging into the /FileResource/DisplayResource/92775559-5a18-4444-a996-d8e09df9e06d Upper Truckee River (Timing:Before)(-125 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/4395af59-eOd4-4246-8ab9-24081 ae66al 5 On Egret Way,near South Upper Truckee Road (Timing:Before)(-621 KB) /Fi IeResou rce/DisplayResource/2abcdde0-fc96-459e-9716-169d 12056137 eWATERSHEDS ■ Upper Truckee River(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/62) oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/SoilConservation):Project will include work to restore and enhance existing SEZ areas within the Project area. ■ Vegetation Preservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/DetailNegetationPreservation):Will include the eradication of invasive plant species within the project area.Also include coordination with the TFFT to reduce forest fuels. ■ Water Quality(https:Hthresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality):Will include the construction of water quality BMPs and LID principles in the treatment of stormwater runoff e LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. eEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES No notes entered. https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3784 4/5 8/16/2019 LT Info 1 01.01.01.0103-South Upper Truckee Water Quality Project Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3784 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0114-Tahoma Roads Water Quality Project (https://laketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail%2f4101) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjeCtLiSt) ` 01.01.01.0114 - Tahoma Roads Water Quality Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.01.01.0114) (https://clarity.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description In partnership with El Dorado County,right of way storm water runoff in the Tahoma neighborhood will be addressed.This watershed crosses county-lines and will be coordinated with El Dorado CSAS Project. •Stage Planning/Design •Planning/Design Start Year 2017 •Implementation Start Year 2019 •Completion Year 2020 •Estimated Total Cost $400,000 •Primary Contact Kansas McGahan(kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov(mailto:kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov)) •Added On 01/16/2018 •Last Updated 01/15/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/4101 1/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0114-Tahoma Roads Water Quality Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. vd •� /P� CE 'I ❑RAD❑ l Tahoma fi2?7 R m �m Sugar Pine Point 1 ov,ro�=m fi 0 m Location Information ti Location Notes Latitude: 39.068 Longitude: -120.1358 State: CA County/City: Placer County,CA Watershed: General Creek ORGANIZATIONS eOrganization ALeadlmplementer 9lmplementer AFunder A Primary Contact Placer County,CA(PLCO) O O Kansas McGahan-Placer County,CA(PLCO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/16) U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin (2) Joey Keely-U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/21) EIP BASICS CQ VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.01.01.0114) 1 VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.01.01.0114) A EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.01 -Stormwater Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/1) 0 EIP Action Priority 01.01.01 -Reducing Stormwater Pollution from City and County Roads(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/1) A Project 01.01.01.0114-Tahoma Roads Water Quality Project This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). LAKE CLARITY BASICS ATMDL Pollutant Source Category Urban Uplands(https://clarity.laketahoeinfo.org/Results/Detail/UrbanUplands) https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/4101 2/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0114-Tahoma Roads Water Quality Project Urban Stormwater Questionnaire The Urban Stormwater Questionnaire is not relevant because this project is not seeking voter-approved bond funding through the State of California consistent with the Stormwater Resource Plan(SRP). EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES AEIP Performance Measure ASubcategories OExpected Value Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted [Property Ownership:Placer County],[Road Type:Paved], 1.5 miles (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) [Treatment Type:Retrofitted] REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING AEstimated Total Cost $400,000 oSecured Funding $400,000 OUnfunded Need $0 Funding Sources AFunding Source o5ecured Funding ATargeted Funding Total North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(NLTRA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/25) $150,000 $0 $150,000 Placer County General Fund(PLCO)(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/55) $50,000 $0 $50,000 U.S.Forest Service(USFS-LTBMU)(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/48) $200,000 $0 $200,000 Total $400,000 $0 $400,000 REPORTED EXPENDITURES 0 Funding Source 2017 2018 Total Placer County General Fund(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/55) $0 $10,000 $10,000 Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/35) $0 $0 $0 Total $0 $10,000 $10,000 PHOTOS No photos available. oWATERSHEDS ■ General Creek(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/41) ■ Mckinney Creek(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/39) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/4101 3/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.01.01.0114-Tahoma Roads Water Quality Project ATHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality):Reduction of sediment from ROW. LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Placer County Tahoe Basin Area Plan(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/1027) oEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)i Version 1.9.1947.0 i Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/4101 4/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 1 01.02.01.0005-Upper Truckee River-Tahoe Pines Restoration and Public Access Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail%2f56) Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjectList) ` 01.02.01.0005 - Upper Truckee River - Tahoe Pines Restoration and Publ... (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.02.01.0005) BASICS e Project Description Planning and site improvement activities within the former Tahoe Pines Campground. Project restores uplands,riparian habitat,floodplain,and riverbanks while providing public access improvements in an environmentally sustainable manner. e Stage Planning/Design e Planning/Design Start Year 2010 e Implementation Start Year 2019 0Completion Year 2020 e Estimated Total Cost $1,700,000 e Primary Contact Stuart Roll(stuart.roll@tahoe.ca.gov(mailto:stuart.roll@tahoe.ca.gov)) eAdded On 06/01/2014 e Last Updated 01/24/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/56 1/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 1 01.02.01.0005-Upper Truckee River-Tahoe Pines Restoration and Public Access Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. + �tir�ri J d327 R �r Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.8474 Longitude: -120.0262 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: Upper Truckee River Info: Tahoe Pines Project Area ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization a Lead Implementer Almplementer AFunder APrimaryContact California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) Stuart Roll-California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/3) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/3) U.S.Bureau of Reclamation(USBOR) None (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/45) EIP BASICS Q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.02.01.0005) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEI NFO.ORG/PROJECT/FU NDI NGREQUESTSH EET/01.02.01.0005) A EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.02-Watershed Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/2) AEIP Action Priority 01.02.01 -Restoring the Upper Truckee Watershed(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/5) A Project 01.02.01.0005-Upper Truckee River-Tahoe Pines Restoration and Public Access Project This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES AEIP Performance Measure A 0Expected Subcategories Value https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/56 2/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 1 01.02.01.0005-Upper Truckee River-Tahoe Pines Restoration and Public Access Project Linear Feet of Stream Channel Restored or Enhanced None linear feet (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/7/Overview) Impervious Coverage Retired(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/8/Overview) None square feet Acres of SEZ Restored or Enhanced(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detai1/9/Overview) None acres Acres of Habitat Restored or Enhanced(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/l2/Overview) None acres Acres of Forest Fuels Reduction Treatment(https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/Indicator/Detai1/19/Overview) None acres Facilities Improved or Created(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/29/Overview) None number REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING 0Estimated Total Cost $1,700,000 ASecured Funding $1,700,000 AUnfunded Need $0 Funding Sources 0 Funding Source ASecured Funding ATargeted Funding Total California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/7) $1,200,000 $0 $1,200,000 U.S.Bureau of Reclamation(USBOR)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/44) $500,000 $0 $500,000 Total $1,700,000 $0 $1,700,000 REPORTED EXPENDITURES 0 Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total California Tahoe Conservancy $25,000 $50,000 $0 $10,500 $20,500 $13,395 $10,775 $57,791 $74,668 $262,629 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/7) U.S.Bureau of Reclamation $20,000 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/44) Total $45,000 $230,000 $0 $10,500 $20,500 $13,395 $10,775 $57,791 $74,668 $462,629 PHOTOS https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/56 3/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 1 01.02.01.0005-Upper Truckee River-Tahoe Pines Restoration and Public Access Project Disturbed flooplain in Flooding at Tahoe Pines campsites area Campground (Timing:Before)(-508 (Timing:Before)(-148 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/28a7f821-bac6-4dad-8b02-9288b1b26e4e /FileResource/DisplayResource/c0825cf6-25el-407b-b4el-8efObfe90c38) ■ 4 4 � 1 L Pre Project Site condition Site of demolisheds (Timing:Before)(-1,009 caretackers house KB) (Timing:After)(-560 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/f9382ffc-2702-4fea-a64b-57006002a9cc /FileResource/DisplayResource/7fafdf23-8lf8-484a-858c-3cc8d913ac25 eWATERSHEDS ■ Upper Truckee River(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/62) eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/SoiIConservation) ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuaIity) e LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Meyers Area Plan(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/1028) eEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES 01/12/2018 4:24 PM Stuart Roll Project costs are anticipated to rise substantially.Once project costs are clearly known the EIP tracker will be updated accordingly. 01/04/2017 3:36 PM Penny Stewart State Public Works Board approval in July 2016.2016 costs associated with property due diligence efforts and state approval process. https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/56 4/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.02.01.0005-Upper Truckee River-Tahoe Pines Restoration and Public Access Project Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (m a i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/56 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 1 01.02.01.0029-Cold Creek Fisheries Enhancement Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2fa/02flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetaila/o2fl661) Project (https:#laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjeCtList) ` 01.02.01.0029 - Cold Creek Fisheries Enhancement Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.02.01.0029) BASICS 0Project Description This project focuses on a section of Cold Creek at the culvert at Pioneer Trail and 100 yards downstream.The original Project scope:The project includes addressing the culvert at Pioneer Trail with respect to fish passage.The goals of this project are to:enhance/improve fisheries and riparian habitat along a portion of Cold Creek;reduce sediment load from adjacent road;reduce sediment load from adjacent slopes. e Stage Planning/Design A Planning/Design Start Year 2007 Almplementation Start Year 2023 ACompletion Year 2025 AEstimated Total Cost $1,844,917 A Primary Contact Donaldo Palaroan(donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us(mailto:donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us)) AAdded On 03/05/2015 0Last Updated 01/03/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/1661 1/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 1 01.02.01.0029-Cold Creek Fisheries Enhancement Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. + /�yyJ n s� r i; < TO o r ,a +u� ro Tian Gil �Trl Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.909 Longitude: -119.9626 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: Trout Creek Info: 95187 ORGANIZATIONS 90rganization ALead Implementer almplementer GFunder A Primary Contact California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) (2) Stuart Roll-California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/3) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/3) El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) O Donaldo Palaroan-El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) EIP BASICS 4 VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.02.01.0029) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.02.01.0029) AEIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) AEIP Program 01.02-Watershed Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/2) 0ElPAction Priority 01.02.01 -Restoring the Upper Truckee Watershed(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/5) A Project 01.02.01.0029-Cold Creek Fisheries Enhancement Project AOld EIP# 401 This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/1661 2/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 1 01.02.01.0029-Cold Creek Fisheries Enhancement Project No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING AEstimated Total Cost $1,844,917 ASecured Funding $274,917 a Unfunded Need $1,570,000 ($1,570,000 identified as ATargeted Funding) Funding Sources A Funding Source ASecured Funding ATargeted Funding Total California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/7) $274,917 $0 $274,917 Proposition 1 (CDFW)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 112) $0 $1,470,000 $1,470,000 SEZ Mitigation Funds(TRPA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/33) $0 $100,000 $100,000 Total $274,917 $1,570,000 $1,844,917 REPORTED EXPENDITURES A Funding Source 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total California Tahoe Conservancy $221,040 $47,779 $170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $268,989 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/7) Total $221,040 $47,779 $170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $268,989 PHOTOS Cold Creek Cold Creek (Timing:Before)(-102 (Timing:Before)(-186 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/0426f764-63bc-44b7-b839-850cad504ebf) (/FileResource/DisplayResource/ed5ffdcd-f7e5-4847-9ca7-9298c8c7740a)j AWATERSHEDS ■ Trout Creek(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/63) https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/1661 3/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 101.02.01.0029-Cold Creek Fisheries Enhancement Project ATHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Fisheries(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/Fisheries) ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/SoilConservation) ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality) A LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. AEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES 01/16/2018 8:32 AM Dan Kikkert The Cold Creek Fisheries Enhancement Project Formulating Alternatives Memorandum was completed in August 2007.After completion of the report,the project was placed on hold.The County has since picked up the project again in terms of looking for funding to move the project forward. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (m a i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 661 4/4 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.02.01.0030-Upper Truckee River Johnson Meadow Restoration Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://laketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetaiI%2f3898) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FUIIProjeCtLiSt) ` 01.02.01.0030 - Upper Truckee River Johnson Meadow Restoration Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/01.02.01.0030) BASICS •Project Description Following public acquisition of the 206+acre meadow property,restoration of the main river channel would be pursued to benefit wildlife habitat, water quality,and to provide dispersed public recreation opportunities. •Stage Planning/Design •Planning/Design Start Year 2018 •Implementation Start Year 2021 •Completion Year 2030 •Estimated Total Cost $11,350,000 •Primary Contact Mollie Hurt(mhurt@tahoercd.org(mailto:mhurt@tahoercd.org)) •Added On 01/17/2017 •Last Updated 01/14/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3898 1/5 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.02.01.0030-Upper Truckee River Johnson Meadow Restoration Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. { BIII Me m 7� n N d a 7 � Golden Bear TO c+ Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.9165 Longitude: -119.9893 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: Upper Truckee River Info: ORGANIZATIONS OOrganization 0 Lead Implementer Olmplementer OFunder 0 Primary Contact California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) O Stuart Roll-California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/3) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/3) Tahoe Resource Conservation District(TRCD) O (D Mollie Hurt-Tahoe Resource Conservation (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/51) District(TRCD) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/51) U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(USACOE) O None (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/43) U.S.Bureau of Reclamation(USBOR) O None (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/45) EIP BASICS CQ VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/01.02.01.0030) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/01.02.01.0030) 0 EIP Focus Area 01 -Watersheds,Habitat,and Water Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/1) OEIP Program 01.02-Watershed Management(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detai1/2) O EIP Action Priority 01.02.01 -Restoring the Upper Truckee Watershed(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/5) 0 Project 01.02.01.0030-Upper Truckee River Johnson Meadow Restoration Project This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3898 2/5 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.02.01.0030-Upper Truckee River Johnson Meadow Restoration Project EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES OEIP Performance Measure OSubcategories 0Expected Value Linear Feet of Stream Channel Restored or Enhanced [Action Performed:Restored],[Watershed: 0 linear (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/7/Overview) Upper Truckee River] feet Acres of SEZ Restored or Enhanced [Action Performed:Restored] acres (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/9/Overview) Acres of Habitat Restored or Enhanced [Action Performed:Restored],[Habitat Type: acres (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/l2/Overview) SEZ/Wetland] Acres of Habitat Restored or Enhanced [Action Performed:Restored],[Habitat Type: acres (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/l2/Overview) Wet Meadows] Acres of Invasive Species Inventoried [Invasive Species Type:Terrestrial] acres (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/l 8/Overview) Acres of Invasive Species Inventoried [Invasive Species Type:Aquatic] acres (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/l 8/Overview) People Served(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/30/Overview) [Primary Service Type:Facility Use] number REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING OEstimated Total Cost $11,350,000 OSecured Funding $0 OUnfunded Need $11,350,000 ($7,550,000 identified as OTargeted Funding) Funding Sources 0 Funding Source OSecured OTargeted Total Funding Funding 319 Funds(USEPA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1101) $0 $700,000 $700,000 California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/7) $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 California Wildlife Conservation Board(WCB) $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 114) Lake Tahoe Restoration Act(USBOR)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1160) $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(USACOE)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/42) $0 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 U.S.Bureau of Reclamation(USBOR)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/44) $0 $850,000 $850,000 Total $0 $7,550,000 $7,550,000 REPORTED EXPENDITURES 0 Funding Source 2018 Total Tahoe Resource Conservation District(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 126) $10,500 $10,500 Total $10,500 $10,500 PHOTOS https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3898 3/5 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.02.01.0030-Upper Truckee River Johnson Meadow Restoration Project Johnson Meadow Kayakers on the Upper (Timing:Before)(-414 Truckee KB) (Timing:Before)(-330 /FileResource/DisplayResource/ed325274-al4f-41a3-a63a-4579d6de03fb) KB) /Fi IeResou rce/DisplayResource/6d290894-2c66-46c6-8e8b-9536a2ffb53 A% m ,r Upper Truckee River in Johnson Meadow (Timing:Before)(-427 KB) /Fi IeResou rce/DisplayResource/58eacf4f-4385-4ea6-b795-768e38b606b0 eWATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Fisheries(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/Fisheries):Restoration of main channel will enhance fisheries habitat. ■ Recreation(https://threshoIds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/Recreation):Restoration of this area will include providing public recreation access. ■ Scenic Resources(https://thresholds.Iaketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/ScenicResources):This project is located immediately adjacent to Highway 50 in South Lake Tahoe,and the scenic quality of the site as viewed from the roadway will be maintained. ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.Iaketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/SoilConservation):Restoration of this reach of the Upper Truckee River will preserve the SEZ and repair disturbed SEZ. ■ Vegetation Preservation(https://thresholds.Iaketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/DetailNegetationPreservation):Restoration of this reach of the Upper Truckee River will provide habitat for native plant species.Surveys for invasive plant species will identify populations that can be removed to reduce threat to native species. • Water Quality(https://thresholds.Iaketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality):Restoration of the main channel of this reach of the Upper Truckee will reduce nutrient and sediment transport to Lake Tahoe. ■ Wildlife(https://thresholds.Iaketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/Wildlife):Restoration of this reach of the Upper Truckee River will potentially provide habitat for species such as the willow flycatcher,as well as other native neotropical migratory birds,and native mammals. e LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. eEXTERNAL LINKS Johnson Meadow(https://tahoercd.org/home/programs-and-prjects-link-page/Johnson-meadow/)G(https://tahoercd.org/home/programs-and- prjects-link-page/johnson-meadow/) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3898 4/5 8/16/2019 LT Info 101.02.01.0030-Upper Truckee River Johnson Meadow Restoration Project NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3898 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.01.0015-Kings Beach Western Approach (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail%2f3819) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjectList) ` 03.01.01.0015 - Kings Beach Western Approach Updates to this project have been submitted but not yet approved.Check back later for more current information on this project. (https://eip.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/FactSheet/03.01.01.0015) (https://transportation.Iaketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description Multi-benefit project improving the mobility,walkability,water quality improvements and sustainability at the SR 267/SR 28 intersection.The existing signalized intersection at State Route(SR)267 and SR 28 in Kings Beach limits vehicular flow during higher traffic volume periods.The project would convert the intersection to a roundabout considered to be an improvement in mobility,safety and efficiency,and LOS.Includes restoration of impervious surfaces,sidewalks and bike trail(Class I)connection.Project components will include acquisition of strategic parcels. •Stage Planning/Design •Planning/Design Start Year 2016 e Implementation Start Year 2019 •Completion Year 2021 •Estimated Total Cost $5,750,000 •Primary Contact Kansas McGahan(kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov(mailto:kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov)) eAdded On 03/14/2017 •Last Updated 03/29/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3819 1/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.01.0015-Kings Beach Western Approach To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. + N, z�z Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 39.2383 Longitude: -120.0313 State: CA County/City: Placer County,CA Watershed: Griff Creek ORGANIZATIONS oOrganization 0 Lead Implementer olmplementer oFunder 0 Primary Contact California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) O Stuart Roll-California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/3) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/3) North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(NLTRA) O None (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/30) Placer County,CA(PLCO) (2) Kansas McGahan-Placer County,CA(PLCO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l6) U.S.Federal Highway Administration(FHWA) None (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/29) U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin 0 Joey Keely-U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) EIP BASICS CQ VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/03.01.01.0015) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/03.01.01.0015) o EIP Focus Area 03-Air Quality and Transportation Focus Area(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/3) oEIP Program 03.01 -Air Quality&Transportation(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/6) aElPAction Priority 03.01.01 -Improving Air Quality(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/l7) o Project 03.01.01.0015-Kings Beach Western Approach This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https:Heip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3819 2/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.01.0015-Kings Beach Western Approach TRANSPORTATION BASICS OTransportation Strategy Corridor Revitalization/Complete Streets(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationStrategy/Detail/2) OTransportation Objective Corridor Revitalization/Complete Streets(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationObjective/Detail/6) OThis project is on the Federal Transportation Improvement Program(FTIP)list Yes A Funding Type Capital OCost in Year of Expenditure ESTIMATED BUDGETS Download Data(https://laketahoeinfo.org/Project/TransportationBudgetByFundingSourceExcelDownload/3819) OFunding Source/Cost Type Total 2021 2020 2( Placer County General Fund(PLCO)(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/55) $110,000 Preliminary Engineering $60,000 $0 $0 $50,( Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $50,000 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 Proposition 1 (CTC)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1153) $1,650,000 Preliminary Engineering $0 $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $1,650,000 $0 $0 $1,600,C Construction $0 $0 $0 Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-California(FHWA)(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l143) $650,000 Preliminary Engineering $650,000 $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 Grand Total $2,410,000 $0 $0 $1,650,( EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES OEIP Performance Measure OSubcategories A Expected Value Acres of SEZ Restored or Enhanced [Action Performed:Restored] 1 acres (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/9/Overview) Acres of Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquired [Acres of Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquired: 1 acres (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/10/Overview) General] Miles of Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes Improved or Constructed [Action Performed:Constructed],[Path or Route 0.1 miles (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/23/Overview) Type:Class I/Shared Use Path] Tons of Greenhouse Gases Reduced [Type of Mitigation:Sequestration] tons (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/25/Overview) REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3819 3/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.01.0015-Kings Beach Western Approach EXPECTED FUNDING AEstimated Total Cost $5,750,000 OSecured Funding $2,410,000 GUnfunded Need $3,340,000 ($1,400,000 identified as ATargeted Funding) Funding Sources 0 Funding Source ASecured ATargeted Total Funding Funding Lake Tahoe Restoration Act(USFS-LTBMU)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1159) $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(NLTRA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/25) $110,000 $400,000 $510,000 Proposition 1 (CTC)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1153) $1,650,000 $0 $1,650,000 Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-California(FHWA) $650,000 $0 $650,000 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 143) Total $2,410,000 $1,400,000 $3,810,000 REPORTED EXPENDITURES 0 Funding Source 2016 2017 2018 Total North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/25) $10,000 $25,000 $75,000 $110,000 Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-Califo...(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1143) $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $10,000 $25,000 $75,000 $110,000 PHOTOS qt Kings Beach Boardwalk Kings Beach Western (Timing:After)(-1,801 Approach Vision Concept KB) (Timing:After)(-430 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/ae0156e1-2545-4e6b-a484-2f852aba58 /FileResource/DisplayResource/a04e7755-ced7-4468-9785-c86ff62bcb9b) oWATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Air Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/AirQuality) ■ Recreation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThreshoIdCategory/Detail/Recreation) ■ Scenic Resources(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/ScenicResources) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3819 4/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.01.0015-Kings Beach Western Approach ■ Soil Conservation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/SoilConservation) ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality) o LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Linking Tahoe-Regional Transportation Plan 2016 Constrained List(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l2) oEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES 01/23/2018 3:36 PM Morgan Beryl In the 2017 RTP constrained project list,this project is named:Mobility Improvements on SR 267/SR 28 Intersection.When the RTP is amended,this project name should be updated to the current project name,which is now Kings Beach Western Approach. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3819 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0001 -Kings Beach Commercial Core Improvement Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail0/02fl24) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjectList) ` 03.01.02.0001 - Kings Beach Commercial Core Improvement Project Updates to this project have been submitted but not yet approved.Check back later for more current information on this project. (https://eip.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/FactSheet/03.01.02.0001) (https://transportation.Iaketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description The Kings Beach Commercial Core Improvement Project will construct bike lanes,sidewalks,roadway lane reconfiguration,intersection improvements,corridor beautification improvements,public parking,bus shelters,and traffic calming measures within the Kings Beach community including along 1.1 miles of State Highway 28,County roads,and property from Chipmunk Street to State Highway 267.Integral to this'complete streets'project will be the upgrade of existing roadway and drainage infrastructure and treatment for urban storm water.The project will enhance pedestrian and bicyclist mobility and improve access and connectivity to businesses,residential homes,and public facilities. •Stage Completed •Planning/Design Start Year 2013 •Implementation Start Year 2013 •Completion Year 2017 •Estimated Total Cost $29,000,000 •Primary Contact Kansas McGahan(kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov(mailto:kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov)) •Added On 06/01/2014 •Last Updated 10/25/2018 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/124 1/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0001 -Kings Beach Commercial Core Improvement Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. + J Tru-:k-: V�dShOB Lal* •.i I,III King:`• I St.t.Park Labe Tahoe N—J a Sate Park Carson City L?RSOPf�7J I.'GE Lake Tahoe I 3 f,y,� "_ ilpF' 1 I Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 39.2358 Longitude: -120.0221 State: CA County/City: Placer County,CA Watershed: Kings Beach ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization aLeadlmplementer Olmplementer AFunder 0 Primary Contact California Department of Transportation O Nadarajah(Sutha)Suthahar-California (Caltrans) Department of Transportation(Caltrans) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/2) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/2) North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(NLTRA) 9 None (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/30) Placer County,CA(PLCO) O O Kansas McGahan-Placer County,CA(PLCO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/16) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l6) U.S.Department of Housing and Urban O None Development(HUD) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/54) U.S.Federal Highway Administration(FHWA) 9 None (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/29) U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin 19 Joey Keely-U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) EIP BASICS 4VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/03.01.02.0001) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/03.01.02.0001) AEIP Focus Area 03-Air Quality and Transportation Focus Area(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/3) AEIP Program 03.01 -Air Quality&Transportation(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/6) 0 EIP Action Priority 03.01.02-Improving Transit and Trails Connections(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/l8) https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l24 2/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0001 -Kings Beach Commercial Core Improvement Project A Project 03.01.02.0001 -Kings Beach Commercial Core Improvement Project e Old EIP# 925 TRANSPORTATION BASICS eTransportation Strategy Corridor Revitalization/Complete Streets(https://transportation.Iaketahoeinfo.org/TransportationStrategy/Detail/2) eTransportation Objective Corridor Revitalization/Complete Streets(https://transportation.Iaketahoeinfo.org/TransportationObjective/Detail/6) eThis project is on the Federal Transportation Improvement Program(FTIP)list Yes e Funding Type Capital 0Cost in Year of Expenditure ESTIMATED BUDGETS r� Download Data(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Transportation BudgetByFundingSourceExcelDownIoad/124) 9 Funding Source/Cost Type Total 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Placer County General Fund(PLCO)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/55) $300,000 Preliminary Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $300,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 STIP Advance Construction Funds(Caltrans)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l099) $7,600,000 Preliminary Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $7,600,000 $7,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Grand Total $7,900,000 $7,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES eEIP Performance Measure eSubcategories eExpected Value Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) None 0.6 miles REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) 9 Subcategories Property Ownership Road Type Treatment Type 2015 2016 Total Units Placer County Paved Retrofitted 0.5 0.5 miles Total 0 0.5 0.5 miles Miles of Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes Improved or Constructed(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/23/Overview) e Subcategories Action Performed Path or Route Type 2015 2016 Total Units Constructed Class II/Bike Lane 2.2 0 2.2 miles Constructed Sidewalk 4.2 0 4.2 miles https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/124 3/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0001 -Kings Beach Commercial Core Improvement Project Total 6.4 0 6.4 miles Miles of Utility Lines Buried Underground(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/31/Overview) A Subcategories Scenic Roadway Unit Unit Attainment Status 2015 2016 Total Units Tahoe Vista Attainment 0.516 0.15 0.666 miles Total 0.516 0.15 0.666 miles No accomplishments to report for: Year(s) 2013,2014 Explanation Project under construction EXPECTED FUNDING a Estimated Total Cost $29,000,000 eSecured Funding $29,000,000 eUnfunded Need $0 Funding Sources 0 Funding Source eSecured Funding eTargeted Funding Total Unknown or Unassigned(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 168) $29,000,000 $0 $29,000,000 Total $29,000,000 $0 $29,000,000 REPORTED EXPENDITURES e Funding Source 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Tot, Community Development Block Grant Funds(CDGB) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,0( (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/56) North Lake Tahoe Resort Association $199,118 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $374,573 $0 $0 $573,6S (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detall/25) Placer County General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,480,000 $0 $0 $4,480,0( (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/55) SHOPP Advance Construction Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,000 $0 $0 $105,0( (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 100) Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,0( (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/35) STIP Advance Construction Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,994,088 $470,367 $0 $2,464,4` (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/1099) U.S.Federal Highway Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,0( (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/46) Total $199,118 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,150,000 $0 $6,953,661 $470,367 $0 $9,773,14 PHOTOS https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/124 4/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0001 -Kings Beach Commercial Core Improvement Project Kings Beach Aerial Kings Beach Commercial (Timing:After)(-739 KB) Core Improvement Project/FileResource/Dis la Resource/a527e63a-88b4-4Of9-b15f-4ec93863dcd9 (Timing:Before)(-1,281 KB) /Fi IeResou rce/DisplayResource/4da2da53-b737-4865-9de3-d452916055e2 n 1 Kings Beach Commercial Kings Beach Commercial Core Core (Timing:Before)(-1,018 (Timing:Before)(-1,067 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/7e139506-Of89-492a-aO52-245e5dbOc61b /FileResource/DisplayResource/31c8825f-23b1-4e2b-a9fb-332da3bb4489 ' A Kings Beach Commercial Kings Beach Commercial Core Core (Timing:Before)(-1,077 (Timing:Before)(-1,078 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/a4edO2da-6afb-4d91-bad5-01b50f8dfbf7 /FileResource/DisplayResource/05899ed9-c14e-4c8e-93ef-f26e982ffO15) Kings Beach Commercial Kings Beach Commercial Core Core (Timing:Before)(-1,134 (Timing:Before)(-1,166 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/53464b4b-b88c-4a73-91f6-52dd8a87cc8e /FileResource/DisplayResource/2d878Od3-f18b-475c-9fb3-OfOb77361c1a Kings Beach Commercial Kings Beach Commercial Core Core (Timing:Before)(-1,168 (Timing:Before)(-1,188 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/f67dO677-ed72-4dO4-b650-011fdbOfdO21 /FileResource/DisplayResource/dddf5dd3-59bf-4594-b1ec-2740ae0bb79a https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/124 5/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0001 -Kings Beach Commercial Core Improvement Project IF Kings Beach Commercial Kings Beach Commercial Core Core (Timing:Before)(-1,198 (Timing:Before)(-1,209 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/af15911e-4fO8-4cde-946a-8407345b7ba7 /FileResource/DisplayResource/c053f4a6-a5c9-480a-bff7-bdO7db6cc5b1 Kings Beach Commercial Kings Beach Commercial Core Core (Timing:Before)(-1,210 (Timing:Before)(-1,234 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/3f3c8394-4c89-4d3e-8411-54be1cb1d485 /FileResource/DisplayResource/Ob3e27f2-00fb-41f5-9f64-9e3c11cd0341 Kings Beach Commercial Kings Beach Commercial Core Core (Timing:Before)(-1,305 (Timing:Before)(-1,446 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/07511c6e-878f-4483-b96b-63a89257624e (/FileResource/DisplayResource/7b1be074-76el-4f0d-bd3d-721a3120366b) �i Kings Beach Commercial Core (Timing:Before)(-974 KB) /Fi IeResou rce/DisplayResource/6894e5d7-c503-43cd-b832-2883aOdeb3bc A WATERSHEDS ■ Kings Beach(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/12) oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Air Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/AirQuality) ■ Scenic Resources(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/ScenicResources) ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l24 6/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0001 -Kings Beach Commercial Core Improvement Project o LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. OEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES 07/18/2016 4:40 PM Karen Fink Per Karen Fink conversation with Peter Kraatz 7/18/16-this project will be complete at the end of 2016,so it should not go in the RTP. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l24 7/7 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0004-Sierra Boulevard Complete Streets Project(From US Highway 50 to Barbara Avenue) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail%2f290) Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjectList) ` 03.01.02.0004 - Sierra Boulevard Complete Streets Project (From US Hig... (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/03.01.02.0004) (https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS 0 Project Description The primary intent of the project is the rehabilitation of the 0.6-mile stretch of Sierra Blvd from Palmira Avenue to Barbara Ave.The rehabilitation of Sierra Blvd will include redesign of the roadway section,the addition of bike lane(s),paths,pedestrian sidewalks and the addition of streetscape improvements such as pedestrian lighting,hardscape,and landscape improvements in conjunction with a Rule 20 Utility undergrounding project that occurred in 2011.The project will also provide corridor water quality improvements and tie-in with the erosion control improvements surrounding the project area.The Complete Streets project would provide a major link. e Stage Planning/Design A Planning/Design Start Year 2013 A Implementation Start Year 2019 0Completion Year 2019 A Estimated Total Cost $6,827,972 A Primary Contact Stan Hill(shill@cityofslt.us(mailto:shill@cityofslt.us)) AAdded On 12/21/2016 A Last Updated 11/06/2018 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/290 1/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0004-Sierra Boulevard Complete Streets Project(From US Highway 50 to Barbara Avenue) To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. + 'J`� Labe Tal C commm col leg h' \Ca r ra a + 3 9 RivaF f7r s'Sc � ay �' `� i N ep p4 - ode • AI a42 a E ti Ge Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.9221 Sierra Blvd Complete Streets Project Longitude: -119.9827 extends between Palmira Avenue State: CA and Barbara Avenue. County/City: City of South Lake Tahoe Watershed: Trout Creek ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization 0 Lead Implementer almplementer AFunder aPrimaryContact City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) O O Stan Hill-City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) U.S.Federal Highway Administration(FHWA) G None (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detall/29) EIP BASICS Q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/03.01.02.0004) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEI NFO.ORG/PROJECT/FU NDI NGREQUESTSH EET/03.01.02.0004) 0 EIP Focus Area 03-Air Quality and Transportation Focus Area(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/3) OEIP Program 03.01 -Air Quality&Transportation(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/6) 0EIP Action Priority 03.01.02-Improving Transit and Trails Connections(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/l8) 0 Project 03.01.02.0004-Sierra Boulevard Complete Streets Project(From US Highway 50 to Barbara Avenue) This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). TRANSPORTATION BASICS aTransportation Strategy Corridor Revitalization/Complete Streets(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationStrategy/Detail/2) aTransportation Objective https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/290 2/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0004-Sierra Boulevard Complete Streets Project(From US Highway 50 to Barbara Avenue) Corridor Revitalization/Complete Streets(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationObjective/Detail/6) OThis project is on the Federal Transportation Improvement Program(FTIP)list Yes 0 Funding Type Capital OCost in Year of Expenditure ESTIMATED BUDGETS ,r' Download Data(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/TransportationBudgetByFundingSourceExcelDownIoad/290) A Funding Source/Cost Type Total 2019 City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(CSLT)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l0) $541,925 Preliminary Engineering $67,336 $0 $26 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 Construction $474,589 $259,589 $215 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program(CMAQ)(FHWA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/12) $1,814,014 Preliminary Engineering $601,455 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 Construction $1,212,559 $0 $1,212 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund(GGRF)(Caltrans)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1166) $2,900,000 Preliminary Engineering $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 Construction $2,900,000 $0 $2,900 South Tahoe Public Utility District(STPUD)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/59) $487,330 Preliminary Engineering $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 Construction $487,330 $0 $487 Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-California(FHWA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 143) $1,152,049 Preliminary Engineering $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 Construction $1,152,049 $0 $1,152 Grand Total $6,895,318 $259,589 $5,993. EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES OEIP Performance Measure OSubcategories 0 Expected Value Miles of Roads Decommissioned or Retrofitted [Property Ownership:City of South Lake Tahoe],[Road miles (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/5/Overview) Type:Paved],[Treatment Type:Retrofitted] Miles of Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes Improved or Constructed [Action Performed:Constructed],[Path or Route Type: 0.6 miles (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detai1/23/Overview) Sidewalk] Miles of Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes Improved or Constructed [Action Performed:Improved],[Path or Route Type:Class 0.6 miles (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detai1/23/Overview) II/Bike Lane] Miles of Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes Improved or Constructed [Action Performed:Constructed],[Path or Route Type: 0.6 miles (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detai1/23/Overview) Class I/Shared Use Path] REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/290 3/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0004-Sierra Boulevard Complete Streets Project(From US Highway 50 to Barbara Avenue) Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING A Estimated Total Cost $6,827,972 ASecured Funding $6,827,972 oUnfunded Need $0 Funding Sources A Funding Source eSecured 9Targeted Total Funding Funding City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(CS LT)(https://laketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/10) $474,589 $0 $474,589 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program(CMAQ)(FHWA) $1,814,004 $0 $1,814,004 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 2) Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund(GGRF)(Caltrans) $2,900,000 $0 $2,900,000 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 166) South Tahoe Public Utility District(STPUD)(https://laketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/59) $487,330 $0 $487,330 Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-California(FHWA) $1,152,049 $0 $1,152,049 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 143) Total $6,827,972 $0 $6,827,972 REPORTED EXPENDITURES A Funding Source 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,700 $26,600 $67,300 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 0) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program(CMA... $0 $0 $0 $0 $314,126 $205,319 $519,445 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 2) Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $354,826 $231,919 $586,745 PHOTOS https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/290 4/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0004-Sierra Boulevard Complete Streets Project(From US Highway 50 to Barbara Avenue) LM r Sierra Blvd-Before Sierra Blvd Area_2017- Project#1 Flooding (Timing:Before)(-574 (Timing:Before)(-477 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/6e4d864f-75b8-4cb2-950c-357bOe6cl929 /FileResource/DisplayResource/4ec55159-4dca-4adc-8193-ae7ef53afdl5 Sierra-Ski Run_Comparison (Timing:Before)(-339 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/536d0757-7874-42a0-b618-6ab3da074a36 AWATERSHEDS ■ Trout Creek(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/63) ■ Upper Truckee River(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/62) eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Air Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/AirQuality) ■ Recreation(https://threshoIds.Iaketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/Recreation) ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality) ALOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Linking Tahoe-Regional Transportation Plan 2016 Constrained List(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l2) ■ Linking Tahoe Corridor Plan:Meyers/'Y"(Alpaca Station)(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/1021) eEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES 05/03/2016 3:20 PM Jim Marino J.M.-5-03-16 Per TMPO Notification on 4/29/16 the Sierra Boulevard Project has been recommended for CMAQ allocation totaling$1,814,014($601,455 PE and $1,212,559 CON).TMPO Board approval to occur on the 25th of May.Project will be included in the FTIP.City staff will,upon notice of formal award,prepare federal authorization(e-76)for PE phase no later than July 18,2016.City staff will begin RFP process for design consultant in May 2016. https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/290 5/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0004-Sierra Boulevard Complete Streets Project(From US Highway 50 to Barbara Avenue) Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (m a i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/290 6/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0011 -North Tahoe Regional Bike Trail (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a°/02f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail%2f47) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjectList) ` 03.01.02.0011 - North Tahoe Regional Bike Trail (https://eip.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/FactSheet/03.01.02.0011) (https://transportation.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description Construction of approximately 7 miles of Class 1 bike trail that will link the Dollar Hill Multi-use Trail with the North Tahoe Regional Park in Tahoe Vista. •Stage Planning/Design •Planning/Design Start Year 2007 •Implementation Start Year 2021 •Completion Year 2024 •Estimated Total Cost $12,000,000 •Primary Contact Kansas McGahan(kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov(mailto:kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov)) •Added On 12/22/2016 •Last Updated 01/30/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/47 1/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0011 -North Tahoe Regional Bike Trail To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. North Tahoe C' Reg io n sl Psrk Old Brockw Goff Co.r.� Tahoe Vista Kings Beach c pg ro r� m i m 94 l; Carnelian Bay�ti"� Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 39.1986 Longitude: -120.1113 State: CA County/City: Placer County,CA Watershed: Dollar Creek ORGANIZATIONS GOrganization 0 Lead Implementer 9lmplementer AFunder 0 Primary Contact California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) O Stuart Roll-California Tahoe Conservancy(CTC) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/3) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/3) North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(NLTRA) (2) None (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/30) North Tahoe Public Utility District(NTPUD) G) Suzi Gibbons-North Tahoe Public Utility District (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 5) (NTPUD) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/15) Placer County,CA(PLCO) O Kansas McGahan-Placer County,CA(PLCO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/16) U.S.Federal Highway Administration(FHWA) None (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/29) EIP BASICS Cl,VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/03.01.02.0011) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/03.01.02.0011) A EIP Focus Area 03-Air Quality and Transportation Focus Area(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/3) AEIP Program 03.01 -Air Quality&Transportation(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/6) A EIP Action Priority 03.01.02-Improving Transit and Trails Connections(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/l8) A Project 03.01.02.0011 -North Tahoe Regional Bike Trail This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/47 2/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0011 -North Tahoe Regional Bike Trail TRANSPORTATION BASICS OTransportation Strategy Bike and Pedestrian(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationStrategy/Detail/1) ATransportation Objective C-1/Shared Use(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationObjective/Detail/2) OThis project is on the Federal Transportation Improvement Program(FTIP)list Yes 0 Funding Type Capital OCost in Year of Expenditure ESTIMATED BUDGETS r� Download Data(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Transportation BudgetByFundingSourceExcelDownIoad/47) 0 Funding Source/Cost Type Total 2024 2023 2 California Active Transportation Program(ATP)Funds-State(Caltrans)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 127) $163,000 Preliminary Engineering $163,000 $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(NLTRA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/25) $400,000 Preliminary Engineering $400,000 $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-California(FHWA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 143) $337,000 Preliminary Engineering $337,000 $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 Grand Total $900,000 $0 $0 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING OEstimated Total Cost $12,000,000 OSecured Funding $900,000 OUnfunded Need $11,100,000 ($11,780,000 identified as OTargeted Funding) https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/47 3/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0011 -North Tahoe Regional Bike Trail Funding Sources 0 Funding Source eSecured eTargeted Total Funding Funding California Active Transportation Program(ATP)Funds-State(Caltrans) $163,000 $0 $163,000 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 127) North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(NLTRA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/25) $400,000 $11,780,000 $12,180,000 Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-California(FHWA) $337,000 $0 $337,000 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 143) Total $900,000 $11,780,000 $12,680,000 REPORTED EXPENDITURES 0Funding Source 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total North Lake Tahoe Resort Association $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $112,000 $38,000 $200,000 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/25) Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $112,000 $38,000 $200,000 PHOTOS No photos available. eWATERSHEDS ■ Carnelian Bay Creek(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/l6) ■ Carnelian Canyon(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/l1) ■ Cedar Flats(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/l8) ■ Dollar Creek(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/20) ■ Tahoe vista(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/6) ■ Watson(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/14) eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Air Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/AirQuality) ■ Recreation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThreshoIdCategory/Detail/Recreation) e LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Linking Tahoe-Regional Transportation Plan 2016 Unconstrained List(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l 1) ■ Linking Tahoe Corridor Plan:California SR 89/SR 28(North and West Shores)(North by Northwest) (https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/1017) eEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/47 4/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0011 -North Tahoe Regional Bike Trail 05/21/2014 6:01 PM System Due to environmental constraints,this project will be restructured to allow for construction of shorter segments with a programatic plan.In addition,the California Tahoe Conservancy or another agency will take the lead for the environmental review portion of the project. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/47 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0040-Class I Bike Path:East San Bernardino-West San Bernardino (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail%2fl391) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjectList) ` 03.01.02.0040 - Class I Bike Path: East San Bernardino - West San Ber... (https://eip.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/FactSheet/03.01.02.0040) (https://transportation.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description Construct approximately 0.37 miles of Class I bike path between West San Bernardino Ave and East San Bernardino Ave.The pathway will cross the Upper Truckee River and include access to Washoe Meadows State Park,Tahoe Paradise Park,and the Lake Tahoe Environmental Science Magnet School in the community of Meyers.The project proposes to link the bike lane facilities along North Upper Truckee Rd and Apache Ave via a Class 3 (bike route)through signage and pavement markings. •Stage Planning/Design •Planning/Design Start Year 2015 •Implementation Start Year 2019 •Completion Year 2020 •Estimated Total Cost $2,518,504 •Primary Contact Donaldo Palaroan(donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us(mailto:donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us)) •Added On 07/16/2014 •Last Updated 07/16/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/1391 1/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0040-Class I Bike Path:East San Bernardino-West San Bernardino To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. m ri --SenaCb� �—Te hia ma 4 �K-iame Dr 2 gt v`g� a ty Dr 3aoo r R 89 Tahoe r. Paradise Golf ,� ' � Course Chippe Wd Vi N � Jtt�q�P 5 a 2 a aQ r C Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.8562 Longitude: -120.0271 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: Upper Truckee River ORGANIZATIONS eOrganization OLeadlmplementer 9lmplementer AFunder 0 Primary Contact El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) G) Donaldo Palaroan-El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/6) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) Kimberly Caringer-Tahoe Regional Planning (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l8) Agency(TRPA) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/18) U.S.Federal Highway Administration(FHWA) None (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/29) EIP BASICS Q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/03.01.02.0040) VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/03.01.02.0040) A EIP Focus Area 03-Air Quality and Transportation Focus Area(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/3) AEIP Program 03.01 -Air Quality&Transportation(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/6) AEIP Action Priority 03.01.02-Improving Transit and Trails Connections(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/l8) A Project 03.01.02.0040-Class I Bike Path:East San Bernardino-West San Bernardino This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). TRANSPORTATION BASICS https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/1391 2/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0040-Class I Bike Path:East San Bernardino-West San Bernardino OTransportation Strategy Bike and Pedestrian(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationStrategy/Detail/1) OTransportation Objective C-I/Shared Use(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/Transportation0bjective/Detail/2) OThis project is on the Federal Transportation Improvement Program(FTIP)list Yes A Funding Type Capital OCost in Year of Expenditure ESTIMATED BUDGETS rr Download Data(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/TransportationBudgetByFundingSourceExcelDownload/1391) 0 Funding Source/Cost Type Total 2021 202( AQ Mitigation Funds(TRPA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1) $213,970 Preliminary Engineering $52,019 $0 $( Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $( Construction $161,951 $32,390 $129,561 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program(CMAQ)(FHWA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/12) $250,000 Preliminary Engineering $0 $0 $( Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $( Construction $250,000 $250,000 $( Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-California(FHWA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l143) $1,453,525 Preliminary Engineering $453,525 $0 $( Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $( Construction $1,000,000 SO $1,000,00( Grand Total $1,917,495 $282,390 $1,129,561 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES OEIP Performance Measure OSubcategories 0 Expected Value Miles of Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes Improved or Constructed [Action Performed:Constructed],[Path or Route 0.37 miles (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/23/Overview) Type:Class I/Shared Use Path] REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING OEstimated Total Cost $2,518,504 OSecured Funding $1,917,495 OUnfunded Need $601,009 Funding Sources https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 391 3/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0040-Class I Bike Path:East San Bernardino-West San Bernardino 0 Funding Source eSecured Funding eTargeted Funding Total Unknown or Unassigned(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 168) $1,917,495 $0 $1,917,495 Total $1,917,495 $0 $1,917,495 REPORTED EXPENDITURES eFunding Source 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total AQ Mitigation Funds(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1) $0 $0 $11,820 $0 $11,820 Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-Califo...(https://laketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1143) $0 $0 $76,845 $15,877 $92,722 Total $0 $0 $88,665 $15,877 $104,542 PHOTOS View in the easterly View in the southeasterly direction towards Tahoe direction at the end of W Paradise Park,near San Bernardino Ave near 38.8573,-120.0269. 38.8562,-120.0299, (Timing:Before)(-644 (Timing:Before)(--409 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/8f15bed8-293b-46dc-8dOe-bc812ab59073 /FileResource/DisplayResource/b7bcbOa2-27c5-472d-a6Oe-b8eed4551147 View in the View in the westerly southwesterly direction direction across the across the Upper Upper Truckee River, Truckee River,near near 38.8573,-120.0269. 38.8574,-120.0270. (Timing:Before)(-647 (Timing:Before)(-635 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/Oc4f9bea-abc4-47bf-b29c-119c81 688de /Fi IeResou rce/DisplayResource/a9ac2625-9338-476c-a2ea-46f3338739c eWATERSHEDS ■ Upper Truckee River(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/62) eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Air Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/AirQuality) ■ Recreation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThreshoIdCategory/Detail/Recreation) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 391 4/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0040-Class I Bike Path:East San Bernardino-West San Bernardino o LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Linking Tahoe-Regional Transportation Plan 2016 Constrained List(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l2) ■ Linking Tahoe Corridor Plan:MeyersfY'(Alpaca Station)(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detai1/1021) ■ Meyers Area Plan(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/1028) oEXTERNAL LINKS Project webpage(https://www.edcgov.us/Government/dot/TahoeEngineering/Pages/San-Bernardino-Class-1-Bike-Path-Project.aspx)G (https://www.edcgov.0 s/Gove rn me nt/dot/Ta hoe Engi neering/Pages/Sa n-Bernardi no-Class-1-Bike-Path-Project.aspx) NOTES 07/12/2019 9:34 AM Donaldo Palaroan Added 2019 RGP award of$250k of CMAQ construction for 20/21 05/04/2018 3:47 PM Donaldo Palaroan Removed previously awarded CMAQ,added to STBG IFFY 19/20. 12/29/2017 2:44 PM Donaldo Palaroan Dec 2017,Added 17/18 budget(Preliminary Engineering and Construction)of the newly recommended award of the Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG) Program Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 391 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0072-Tahoe City Complete Streets Highway Improvements (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://laketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetaiI%2f2699) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjectList) ` 03.01.02.0072 -Tahoe City Complete Streets Highway Improvements (https://eip.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/FactSheet/03.01.02.0072) (https://transportation.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description This project implements Tahoe City RSA improvement recommendations including Grove Street crossing improvements,bulb-outs at crosswalks along SR 28,and the"Missing Link"trail connecting Tahoe City.The Grove Street HAWK is a proposed mitigation measure required as part of adoption of the Placer County Tahoe Basin Area Plan(Project PC2993)..01 Missing Link Trail.02 Grove Street Crossing Improvements.03 Bulb-outs at crosswalks on SR 28 •Stage Planning/Design •Planning/Design Start Year 2016 •Implementation Start Year 2019 •Completion Year 2022 •Estimated Total Cost $1,600,000 •Primary Contact Kansas McGahan(kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov(mailto:kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov)) •Added On 12/21/2016 •Last Updated 01/30/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/2699 1/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0072-Tahoe City Complete Streets Highway Improvements To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. afroe City e, v- a v Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 39.1709 Longitude: -120.1415 State: CA County/City: Placer County,CA Watershed: Tahoe State Park ORGANIZATIONS GOrganization 0 Lead Implementer 9lmplementer AFunder APrimaryContact North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(NLTRA) O None (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/30) Placer County,CA(PLCO) Kansas McGahan-Placer County,CA(PLCO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/16) EIP BASICS CQ VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/03.01.02.0072) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/03.01.02.0072) A EIP Focus Area 03-Air Quality and Transportation Focus Area(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/3) AEIP Program 03.01 -Air Quality&Transportation(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/6) A EIP Action Priority 03.01.02-Improving Transit and Trails Connections(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/l8) A Project 03.01.02.0072-Tahoe City Complete Streets Highway Improvements This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). TRANSPORTATION BASICS ATransportation Strategy Corridor Revitalization/Complete Streets(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationStrategy/Detail/2) ATransportation Objective https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/2699 2/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0072-Tahoe City Complete Streets Highway Improvements Corridor Revitalization/Complete Streets(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationObjective/Detail/6) eThis project is on the Federal Transportation Improvement Program(FTIP)list No e Funding Type Capital 0Cost in Year of Expenditure $1,713,960(Using 3.50%annual inflation) ESTIMATED BUDGETS rr No budgets have been entered for this project. EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING eEstimated Total Cost $1,600,000 eSecured Funding $65,000 eUnfunded Need $1,535,000 Funding Sources e Funding Source eSecured Funding eTargeted Funding Total North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(NLTRA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/25) $50,000 $0 $50,000 Placer County General Fund(PLCO)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/55) $15,000 $0 $15,000 Total $65,000 $0 $65,000 REPORTED EXPENDITURES e Funding Source 2016 2017 2018 Total North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/25) $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000 Total $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000 PHOTOS No photos available. e WATERSHEDS ■ Tahoe State Park(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/25) https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/2699 3/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0072-Tahoe City Complete Streets Highway Improvements eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Air Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/AirQuality) e LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Linking Tahoe-Regional Transportation Plan 2016 Constrained List(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l2) ■ Linking Tahoe Corridor Plan:California SR 89/SR 28(North and West Shores)(North by Northwest) (https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/1017) @EXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES 12/12/2016 3:39 PM Lucia Maloney Previously called:Tahoe City Traffic Management Program. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/2699 4/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0074-Meyers Corridor Operational Improvement Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail%2f2701) Project (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjectList) ` 03.01.02.0074 - Meyers Corridor Operational Improvement Project (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/03.01.02.0074) (https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS 0 Project Description The project includes the planning,design,and construction of a multimodal complete streets strategy within the 1.3 mile stretch of the Meyers corridor along US Highway 50/State Route 89.It will accomplish complete streets by enhancing and improving intersections,adding lighting,signage, landscaping and reduce reliance on the private automobile,provide multimodal transportation improvements like visible crosswalks for bicycle and pedestrian movements,providing for future growth for transit facilities to enhance circulation and provide opportunities to experience Meyers as a pedestrian or cyclist. e Stage Planning/Design A Planning/Design Start Year 2007 A Implementation Start Year 2019 0Completion Year 2022 AEstimated Total Cost $12,807,903 A Primary Contact Donaldo Palaroan(donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us(mailto:donaldo.palaroan@edcgov.us)) AAdded On 08/10/2015 A Last Updated 07/16/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/2701 1/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0074-Meyers Corridor Operational Improvement Project To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. 8r� 'a C glis:kl 4 q' W�nvg �, P� Tahoe Paradise GoRourse C y �n pr V ,, c.nlppex�s� N• Ima'P P K ` u N N Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.8556 Longitude: -120.0127 State: CA County/City: El Dorado County,CA Watershed: Upper Truckee River ORGANIZATIONS OOrganization 0 Lead Implementer 0lmplementer OFunder OPrimaryContact EI Dorado County,CA(ELDO) O Donaldo Palaroan-El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) U.S.Federal Highway Administration(FHWA) 9 None (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/29) EIP BASICS q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/03.01.02.0074) VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/03.01.02.0074) 0ElP Focus Area 03-Air Quality and Transportation Focus Area(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/3) OEIP Program 03.01 -Air Quality&Transportation(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/6) 0 EIP Action Priority 03.01.02-Improving Transit and Trails Connections(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/l8) 0 Project 03.01.02.0074-Meyers Corridor Operational Improvement Project This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). TRANSPORTATION BASICS OTransportation Strategy Corridor Revitalization/Complete Streets(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationStrategy/Detail/2) OTransportation Objective https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/2701 2/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0074-Meyers Corridor Operational Improvement Project Corridor Revitalization/Complete Streets(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationObjective/Detail/6) AThis project is on the Federal Transportation Improvement Program(FTIP)list Yes 0 Funding Type Capital 9Cost in Year of Expenditure ESTIMATED BUDGETS r' Download Data(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/TransportationBudgetByFundingSourceExcelDownIoad/2701) A Funding Source/Cost Type Total 2022 AQ Mitigation Funds(TRPA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1) $719,620 Preliminary Engineering $241,939 $0 $32 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $160,000 $0 Construction $317,681 $255,006 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program(CMAQ)(FHWA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/12) $2,463,441 Preliminary Engineering $511,455 $0 $250 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 Construction $1,951,986 $1,468,235 Highway Safety Improvement Program(HSIP)(FHWA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 146) $3,451,000 Preliminary Engineering $0 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 Construction $3,451,000 $0 Regional Surface Transportation Program Funds(RSTP)(FHWA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/30) $255,894 Preliminary Engineering $255,894 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-California(FHWA)(https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1143) $1,500,000 Preliminary Engineering $1,000,000 $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 Construction $500,000 $500,000 Grand Total $8,389,955 $2,223,241 $282 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING A Estimated Total Cost $12,807,903 ASecured Funding $8,389,955 AUnfunded Need $4,417,948 https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/2701 3/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0074-Meyers Corridor Operational Improvement Project Funding Sources 0Funding Source ASecured Funding oTargeted Funding Total Unknown or Unassigned(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l168) $8,389,955 $0 $8,389,955 Total $8,389,955 $0 $8,389,955 REPORTED EXPENDITURES AFundingSource 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 201 Regional Surface Transportation Program Funds $2,777 $34,714 $13,276 $65,049 $9,575 $11,343 $10,764 $0 $32,030 $58,823 $30,1 E (RST... (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/30) Total $2,777 $34,714 $13,276 $65,049 $9,575 $11,343 $10,764 $0 $32,030 $58,823 $30,1E PHOTOS �1 M111111MAk A., Along US Hwy 50/State Pioneer Trail signal at Route 89,south of crosswalk Pioneer Trail (Timing:Before)(-250 (Timing:Before)(-31 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/5471ca3e-8c36-4898-ad1e-cea184ea5350 /FileResource/DisplayResource/f82a4dfe-530c-4cdc-af94-d57dcd877daa Pioneer Trail signal, Westerly on westbound looking towards Meyers Pioneer Trail towards US (Timing:Before)(-300 Hwy 50 KB) (Timing:Before)(-2,569 /FileResource/DisplayResource/cbd11132-7f8a-46f0-93f5-64ea9abfa832 KB) /Fi leResource/DisplayResou rce/aee5f3b6-bdce-4729-bc0e-420f327182a3 AWATERSHEDS • Upper Truckee River(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Watershed/Detail/62) ATHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Air Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/AirQuality) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/2701 4/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0074-Meyers Corridor Operational Improvement Project ALOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Linking Tahoe-Regional Transportation Plan 2016 Constrained List(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l2) ■ Linking Tahoe Corridor Plan:Meyers/'Y"(Alpaca Station)(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/1021) ■ Meyers Area Plan(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l028) AEXTERNAL LINKS Project link(https://www.edcgov.us/government/dot/tahoeengineering/pages/meyerscoip.aspx)L (https://www.edcgov.us/government/dot/ta hoeengineeri ng/pages/meyerscoip.aspx) NOTES 07/12/2019 9:47 AM Donaldo Palaroan Added 2019 RGP award of$250k CMAQ in 20/21 for PE,$1,468,235 CMAQ in 21/22 for CON,and$500k STBG in 21/22 for CON 05/04/2018 3:58 PM Donaldo Palaroan Added STBG Cycle 2 award amount in FFY 19/20. 12/29/2017 2:40 PM Donaldo Palaroan Dec 2017,Added 17/18 budget(Preliminary Engineering)for newly recommended award of the Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)Program. 01/18/2017 2:16 PM Donaldo Palaroan Jan 2017,Budget section for Construction:2020 TRPA Air Quality Mitigation Funds will be a future request. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (m a i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/2701 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0094-Lake Tahoe Boulevard Class 1 Bicycle Trail(Viking Way to South Wye) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://laketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetaiI%2f3826) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjectList) ` 03.01.02.0094 - Lake Tahoe Boulevard Class 1 Bicycle Trail (Viking Way... Updates to this project have been submitted but not yet approved.Check back later for more current information on this project. (https://eip.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/FactSheet/03.01.02.0094) (https://transportation.Iaketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description Design and construct Class 1 bike trail,ADA compliant ramps,and pathway lighting along the 0.6 mile section of Lake Tahoe Blvd.from the Intersection of Viking Way(D-Street)to the intersection of State Hwy 89 and US Highway 50(South Wye).Note:Project name was updated from "Viking Way to Lake Tahoe Blvd.Class 1 Bike Trail"on 11/23/16 for consistency with the name CSLT used to apply for CMAQ funds. •Stage Planning/Design •Planning/Design Start Year 2016 •Implementation Start Year 2021 •Completion Year 2021 •Estimated Total Cost $4,250,000 •Primary Contact Stan Hill(shill@cityofslt.us(mailto:shill@cityofslt.us)) •Added On 07/26/2016 •Last Updated 01/07/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3826 1/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0094-Lake Tahoe Boulevard Class 1 Bicycle Trail(Viking Way to South Wye) To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. •I T vLJ -t � �' Tahoe alley �e�'c4J ea NAue th South Av,, Barton Namorol Lake Kmart Fbapital Tahoe 5� 6 S� G y� D 89 m 6 Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 38.9101 Intersection of Viking Way to Longitude: -120.0104 Intersection of State Hwy.89 and Us State: CA Hwy.50 County/City: City of South Lake Tahoe Watershed: Upper Truckee River ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization 0 Lead Implementer Olmplementer oFunder 0 Primary Contact City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) O O Stan Hill-City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/4) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) O KimberlyCaringer-Tahoe Regional Planning (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/18) Agency(TRPA) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 8) U.S.Federal Highway Administration(FHWA) O None (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/29) EIP BASICS 4VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEI N FO.ORG/PROJ ECT/FACTSH EET/03.01.02.0094) VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUN DI NG REQU ESTSH EET/03.01.02.0094) AEIP Focus Area 03-Air Quality and Transportation Focus Area(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/ElPFocusArea/Detail/3) AEIP Program 03.01 -Air Quality&Transportation(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/6) 0ElPAction Priority 03.01.02-Improving Transit and Trails Connections(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/l8) A Project 03.01,02.0094-Lake Tahoe Boulevard Class 1 Bicycle Trail(Viking Way to South Wye) This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https:Heip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). TRANSPORTATION BASICS https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3826 2/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0094-Lake Tahoe Boulevard Class 1 Bicycle Trail(Viking Way to South Wye) OTransportation Strategy Bike and Pedestrian(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationStrategy/Detail/1) OTransportation Objective C-1/Shared Use(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/Transportation0bjective/Detail/2) OThis project is on the Federal Transportation Improvement Program(FTIP)list Yes A Funding Type Capital OCost in Year of Expenditure ESTIMATED BUDGETS it Download Data(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/TransportationBudgetByFundingSourceExcelDownload/3826) OFunding Source/Cost Type Total City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(CSLT)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/10) $270,448 Preliminary Engineering $64,338 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $28,561 Construction $177,549 $" Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program(CMAQ)(FHWA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/12) $203,047 Preliminary Engineering $203,047 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 Construction $0 Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-California(FHWA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l143) $1,796,936 Preliminary Engineering $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $249,000 Construction $1,547,936 $1,! Tahoe Fund(Tahoe Fund)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/38) $0 Preliminary Engineering $0 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 Construction $0 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1075) $10,000 Preliminary Engineering $10,000 Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 Construction $0 Grand Total $2,443,431 $1,£ EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES OEIP Performance Measure OSubcategories A Expected Value Miles of Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes Improved or Constructed [Action Performed:Constructed],[Path or Route 0.06 miles (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/23/Overview) Type:Class I/Shared Use Path] REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3826 3/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0094-Lake Tahoe Boulevard Class 1 Bicycle Trail(Viking Way to South Wye) EXPECTED FUNDING AEstimated Total Cost $4,250,000 eSecured Funding $2,237,321 AUnfunded Need $2,012,679 Funding Sources 0 Funding Source oSecured ATargeted Total Funding Funding California Active Transportation Program(ATP)Funds-Federalized(Caltrans) $163,000 $0 $163,000 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 086) City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(CSLT)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/10) $270,448 $0 $270,448 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program(CMAQ)(FHWA) $203,047 $0 $203,047 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l2) On Our Way(TRPA)(https://laketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1163) $10,000 $0 $10,000 Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-California(FHWA) $1,590,826 $0 $1,590,826 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 143) Total $2,237,321 $0 $2,237,321 REPORTED EXPENDITURES 0 Funding Source 2016 2017 2018 Total City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l0) $3,300 $61,038 $0 $64,338 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program(CMA...(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l2) $0 $203,047 $0 $203,047 On Our Way(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l163) $10,000 $0 $0 $10,000 Total $13,300 $264,085 $0 $277,385 PHOTOS No photos available. eWATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Air Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/AirQuality):Class 1/Multi Use trail with Class II in roadway.Traffic congestion reduction,Alternative Transportation link from County to City.Link to Transit Facilities,Civic Facilities,and Commercial Core.Link to School facilities. ■ Recreation(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/Recreation):Bike trail gap closure connecting City to County,to USFS trails/parks,Community parks/fields. A LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3826 4/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0094-Lake Tahoe Boulevard Class 1 Bicycle Trail(Viking Way to South Wye) ■ Area Plan-Tahoe Valley(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l6) ■ Linking Tahoe-Regional Transportation Plan 2016 Constrained List(https://laketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l2) eEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES 1 1/23/201 6 1 2:37 PM Lucia Maloney NOTE-This project was renamed on 11/23/16 to be consistent with the name used by CSLT when they applied for CMAQ funds. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https:Hprojectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3826 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0118-Tahoe City Downtown Access Improvements (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://laketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetaiI%2f3867) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjectList) ` 03.01.02.0118 - Tahoe City Downtown Access Improvements (https://eip.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/FactSheet/03.01.02.0118) (https://transportation.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description Grove Street Parking Project:Implementing some of Tahoe City Mobility Study Recommendations,Parking expansion and circulation at Grove Street, improved pedestrian access,driveway and private parking consolidation,and possible redevelopment of business and outdoor public gathering places.These improvements are expected to improve vehicular level of service(LOS)and reduce reliance on the private automobile.Placer County Project PC3015. •Stage Planning/Design •Planning/Design Start Year 2016 •Implementation Start Year 2021 •Completion Year 2023 •Estimated Total Cost $3,000,000 •Primary Contact Kansas McGahan(kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov(mailto:kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov)) •Added On 12/13/2016 •Last Updated 01/30/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3867 1/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0118-Tahoe City Downtown Access Improvements To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. w - d t; hoe City Location Information Location Notes Latitude: 39.1725 Longitude: -120.1392 State: CA County/City: Placer County,CA Watershed: Tahoe State Park ORGANIZATIONS GOrganization 0 Lead Implementer 9lmplementer AFunder APrimaryContact North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(NLTRA) O None (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/30) Placer County,CA(PLCO) (a 9 Kansas McGahan-Placer County,CA(PLCO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/16) EIP BASICS Q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/03.01.02.0118) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/03.01.02.0118) A EIP Focus Area 03-Air Quality and Transportation Focus Area(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/3) AEIP Program 03.01 -Air Quality&Transportation(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/6) A EIP Action Priority 03.01.02-Improving Transit and Trails Connections(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/l8) A Project 03.01.02.0118-Tahoe City Downtown Access Improvements This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). TRANSPORTATION BASICS ATransportation Strategy Corridor Revitalization/Complete Streets(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationStrategy/Detail/2) ATransportation Objective https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3867 2/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0118-Tahoe City Downtown Access Improvements Corridor Revitalization/Complete Streets(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationObjective/Detail/6) AThis project is on the Federal Transportation Improvement Program(FTIP)list Yes 9 Funding Type Capital ACost in Year of Expenditure ESTIMATED BUDGETS r� Download Data(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Transportation BudgetByFundingSourceExcelDownIoad/3867) A Funding Source/Cost Type Total 2023 2022 2021 202 North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(NLTRA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/25) $150,000 Preliminary Engineering $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $ Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-California(FHWA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1143) $650,000 Preliminary Engineering $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $ Right of Way(aka Land Acquisition) $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $ Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Grand Total $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $ EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES AEIP Performance Measure A 0Expected Subcategories Value Pounds of Air Pollutants Removed or Avoided by Project None pounds (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/lndicator/Detai1/24/Overview) Tons of Greenhouse Gases Reduced(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/25/Overview) None tons REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reported Performance Measure Accomplishments are not relevant for projects in the Planning/Design stage. EXPECTED FUNDING AEstimated Total Cost $3,000,000 ASecured Funding $800,000 AUnfunded Need $2,200,000 Funding Sources 0 Funding Source ASecured ATargeted Total Funding Funding North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(NLTRA)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/25) $150,000 $0 $150,000 Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG)-California(FHWA) $650,000 $0 $650,000 (https://Iaketahoe!nfo.org/FundingSource/Deta11/1 143) Total $800,000 $0 $800,000 https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3867 3/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0118-Tahoe City Downtown Access Improvements REPORTED EXPENDITURES 0Funding Source 2016 2017 2018 Total North Lake Tahoe Resort Association(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/25) $0 $0 $0 $0 Placer County General Fund(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/55) $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 Total $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 PHOTOS No photos available. e WATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Air Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/AirQuality):These improvements are expected to improve vehicular level of service(LOS)and reduce reliance on the private automobile,thereby reducing airborne emissions and improving air and water quality. ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality):These improvements are expected to improve vehicular level of service(LOS)and reduce reliance on the private automobile,thereby reducing airborne emissions and improving air and water quality. oLOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. oEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3867 4/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 103.01.02.0118-Tahoe City Downtown Access Improvements Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3867 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 1 05.01.01.0008-Implement Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program-RSWMP(Effectiveness Monitoring) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://laketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?return Uri=https%3a%2f%2fIaketa hoe info.org%2fProject%2fD eta il%2f337) Project (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjectList) ' 05.01.01.0008 - Implement Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program - RSW... (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/05.01.01.0008) BASICS AProject Description The objective of the Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program(RSWMP)is to determine whether urban pollutant load reductions are being achieved in the Tahoe Basin in response to stormwater management actions over time.RSWMP supports the Lake Tahoe Total Daily Maximum Load(TMDL)management system,the jurisdictional National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit and Inter-local Agreement requirements,potential scientific research questions,capital improvement effectiveness evaluations,and potential Pollutant Load Reduction Model(PLRM)improvements.It is designed to collect reliable information on urban stormwater runoff in a standardized,coordinated manner. O Stage Implementation 0Planning/Design Start Year 2011 0Implementation Start Year 2014 ACompletion Year 2076 AEstimated Total Cost $7,000,000 A Primary Contact Mollie Hurt(mhurt@tahoercd.org(mailto:mhurt@tahoercd.org)) AAdded On 06/11/2014 0Last Updated 11/29/2018 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/337 1/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.01.0008-Implement Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program-RSWMP(Effectiveness Monitoring) To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. "Waahoe .: AY G ate Pe kDayton I'.I nil.Beach - Cai son Gity - ke Tahoe Minden Gardnerrille T:ih. 19 Location Information Location Notes Named Area:Basin-wide Area Type:Region ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization eLead Implementer 0implementer OFunder 9 Primary Contact California State Water Resources Control Board O Robert Larsen-California State Water Resources (SWRCB) Control Board(SWRCB) (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 097) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 097) City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) O Stan Hill-City of South Lake Tahoe(CSLT) (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/4) Douglas County,NV(DGCO) O Courtney Walker-Douglas County,NV(DGCO) (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/5) (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/5) El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) 0 Donaldo Palaroan-El Dorado County,CA(ELDO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/6) Nevada Department of Transportation(NDOT) 0 Matt Nussbaumer-Nevada Department of (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/9) Transportation(NDOT) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/9) Placer County,CA(PLCO) 0 Kansas McGahan-Placer County,CA(PLCO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 6) Tahoe Resource Conservation District(TRCD) 0 Mollie Hurt-Tahoe Resource Conservation District (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/51) (TRCD) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/51) U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Management O Joey Keely-U.S.Forest Service-Lake Tahoe Basin Unit(USFS-LTBMU) Management Unit(USFS-LTBMU) (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/21) Washoe County,NV(WACO) 0 Ben Jesch-Washoe County,NV(WACO) (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/25) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/25) EIP BASICS 4 VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/05.01.01.0008) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/05.01.01.0008) BEIP Focus Area 05-Applied Science(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detai1/5) AEIP Program 05.01 -Applied Science Program(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/9) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/337 2/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.01.0008-Implement Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program-RSWMP(Effectiveness Monitoring) A El Action Priority 05.01.01 -Monitoring(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/ElPActionPriority/Detail/25) A Project 05.01.01.0008-Implement Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program-RSWMP(Effectiveness Monitoring) This project is on the LIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No annual performance measure accomplishments entered for this project. No accomplishments to report for: Year(s) 2014,2015,2016,2017,2018 Explanation RSWMP 2014-2018 accomplishments are related to stormwater monitoring and include: •Ongoing stormwater monitoring at at least 7 long-term monitoring sites(catchment outfalls)and 3 BMP effectiveness sites since October 1, 2013.A few sites have been retired due to lack of flow,and other sites have been added as replacements. •Ongoing measurement and management of continuous flow,continuous turbidity,sample event,nutrient,sediment,and meteorological data at all monitoring sites •Completion of the RSWMP Framework and Implementation Guidance(FIG)document,submitted March 31,2015 to the State Water Resources Control Board. •Submittal and acceptance of RSWMP Quality Assurance Project Plan(QAPP),June 2015 to the State Water Resources Control Board. •Submittal and acceptance of RSWMP Annual Stormwater Monitoring Reports for water years 2014,2015,2016,and 2017 to the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for permit and interlocal agreement compliance. •Ongoing Stormwater Campaign for education and outreach to agencies and public including presentations to agencies,printed ads,public service announcements,stormwater awareness posters and brochures,Tahoe RCD newsletter articles. •Completion of fully integrated RSWMP Data Management System with remote access and automated data collection,management,analysis and reporting features. •Completion of integration of RSWMP Data Management System with LT Info monitoring dashboard to present stormwater data. EXPECTED FUNDING oEstimated Total Cost $7,000,000 oSecured Funding $3,053,754 oUnfunded Need $3,946,246 Funding Sources 0 Funding Source oSecured oTargeted Total Funding Funding City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund(CSLT)(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/10) $87,833 $0 $87,833 Douglas County General Fund(DGCO)(https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l3) $87,833 $0 $87,833 El Dorado County General Fund(ELDO)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/14) $293,332 $0 $293,332 Nevada Department of Transportation(NDOT)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/20) $452,090 $0 $452,090 Placer County General Fund(PLCO)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/55) $179,833 $0 $179,833 Proposition 84(SWRCB)(https://laketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1178) $760,000 $0 $760,000 Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act(USFS-LTBMU) $1,013,000 $0 $1,013,000 (https://laketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/35) Washoe County General Fund(WACO)(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1148) $179,833 $0 $179,833 Total $3,053,754 $0 $3,053,754 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/337 3/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.01.0008-Implement Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program-RSWMP(Effectiveness Monitoring) REPORTED EXPENDITURES 0 Funding Source 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total California State Water Resources Control Board $0 $0 $13,000 $196,000 $123,000 $288,000 $140,000 $0 $760,000 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1110) City of South Lake Tahoe General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $33,833 $43,833 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/10) Douglas County General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $33,833 $43,833 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/13) El Dorado County General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,000 $40,833 $53,833 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/14) Nevada Department of Transportation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $67,000 $70,000 $75,040 $212,040 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/20) Placer County General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $33,833 $43,833 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/55) Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act $0 $8,000 $126,000 $190,000 $145,000 $190,000 $354,000 $0 $1,013,000 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/35) Washoe County General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $33,833 $43,833 (https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1148) Total $0 $8,000 $139,000 $386,000 $268,000 $545,000 $617,000 $251,205 $2,214,205 PHOTOS Lakeshore monitoring Processing stormwater station during Nov 16, samples at the lab 2017 storm (Timing:During)(-353 (Timing:During)(-4,203 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/3be42882-2068-44ad-a115-a4b68976bc63 /FileResource/DisplayResource/d34d302b-b6db-43ca-8e06-c146eOb591 ac) 'ram F.. i 4 Sensor installation in a Stormwater monitoring culvert pipe. at the Tahoe Valley site (Timing:During)(-164 (Timing:During)(-368 KB) KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/cOa3132f-8731-4f77-82ae-8c4e559d334c) /FileResource/DisplayResource/baf57614-aff8-4f07-bbcd-56f5bff64cf4 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/337 4/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.01.0008-Implement Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program-RSWMP(Effectiveness Monitoring) Stormwater monitoring station at the Upper Truckee River site (Timing:During)(-2,340 KB) /FileResource/DisplayResource/2bcc5430-2aa8-4a09-a5e5-3a2fb06cdd5a AWATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/DetaiI/WaterQuaIity) o LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. AEXTERNAL LINKS Annual Stormwater Monitoring Report WY14-16(http://tahoercd.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Annual-Stormwater-Monitoring-Report-WY14-16.pdO G(http://tahoercd.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Annual-Stormwater-Monitoring-Report-WY14-16.pcl) Annual Stormwater Monitoring Report WY17(http://tahoercd.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Annual-Stormwater-Monitoring-Report-WY171.pdf)0 (http://ta hoercd.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Annual-Stormwater-Monitoring-Report-WY17l.pdO Implementers Monitoring Program(http://tahoercd.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Implementers-MP-130812.final_.pdf)Ci(http://tahoercd.org/wp- content/uploads/2013/08/Implementers-M P-130812.fi nal_.pdf) Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program Framework and Implementation Guidance(http://tahoercd.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/RSWMP-FIG- FINAL-150331.pdf)0(http://tahoercd.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/RSWMP-FIG-FINAL-150331.pdf) NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfiirma.com)on GitHub(https:Hgithub.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/337 5/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.01.0008-Implement Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program-RSWMP(Effectiveness Monitoring) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/337 6/6 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.02.0059-Complete evaluation of conservation measures and restoration efforts... (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail%2fl581) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjeCtLiSt) ` 05.01.02.0059 - Complete evaluation of conservation measures and resto... (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/05.01.02.0059) BASICS •Project Description Complete evaluation of conservation measures and restoration efforts for unique communities and threatened,endangered,and sensitive species. Identify key indicators of unique condition.These evaluations should include an assessment of potential outcomes given habitat modification due to climate change,recreation and Basin-wide forest-management efforts. •Stage Deferred •Planning/Design Start Year •Implementation Start Year •Completion Year •Estimated Total Cost $400,000 •Primary Contact Pat Manley(pmanley@fs.fed.us(mailto:pmanley@fs.fed.us)) •Added On 01/12/2015 •Last Updated 12/04/2015 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/1581 1/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.02.0059-Complete evaluation of conservation measures and restoration efforts... To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. T ru•:k�•: . v ::arsm r:it: Location Not Specified Location Information Location Notes ORGANIZATIONS 00rganization 0 Lead Implementer 0implementer AFunder APrimaryContact U.S.Forest Service-Pacific Southwest Research O Pat Manley-U.S.Forest Service-Pacific Station(USFS-PSW) Southwest Research Station(USFS-PSW) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/69) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detai1/69) EIP BASICS Q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/05.01.02.0059) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/05.01.02.0059) 0 EIP Focus Area 05-Applied Science(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/5) AEIP Program 05.01 -Applied Science Program(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/9) AEIP Action Priority 05.01.02-Applied Research(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/26) 0 Project 05.01.02.0059-Complete evaluation of conservation measures and restoration efforts... EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No annual performance measure accomplishments entered for this project. EXPECTED FUNDING GEstimated Total Cost $400,000 A Secured Funding $0 https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/1581 2/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.02.0059-Complete evaluation of conservation measures and restoration efforts... oUnfunded Need $400,000 Funding Sources No funding sources identified for this project. REPORTED EXPENDITURES oFundingSource 2018 Total No expenditures have been reported for this project. PHOTOS No photos available. oWATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. oTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES No Threshold Categories set for this project. o LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. oEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 581 3/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.02.0059-Complete evaluation of conservation measures and restoration efforts... https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/l 581 4/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.02.0099-P042:Quantification and Characterization of Trout Creek Restoration Effectiveness (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUri=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetail%2f3950) Project (https://laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FuIIProjectList) ' 05.01.02.0099 - P042: Quantification and Characterization of Trout Cre... (https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FactSheet/05.01.02.0099) BASICS AProject Description Many stream and meadow restoration projects have been implemented throughout the LTB over the past two decades.However a consistent definition of restoration effectiveness has not been defined nor have standardized methods been established to monitor and evaluate pre-and post-restoration conditions.This impedes the ability to define success for designers,funders and reviewers,and to communicate the benefits of stream restoration efforts to regulators and policy makers.In addition,the LTB TMDL and associated Lake Clarity Crediting Program heighten the need to define and standardize a simple yet representative approach to estimate the water quality benefit of stream restoration efforts. A Stage Completed 0Planning/Design Start Year 2008 0Implementation Start Year 2009 ACompletion Year 2013 AEstimated Total Cost $243,073 A Primary Contact Maggie Mathias(maggie@2ndnaturellc.com(mailto:maggie@2ndnaturellc.com)) AAdded On 09/21/2017 0Last Updated 09/21/2017 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3950 1/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.02.0099-P042:Quantification and Characterization of Trout Creek Restoration Effectiveness To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. liu•:k•�a Carson Clt'r . arson CiL'j i Location Information Location Notes Named Area:Basin-wide Area Type:Region ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization eLead Implementer plmplementer pFunder 9 Primary Contact 2nd Nature,LLC(2N) G) Maggie Mathias-2nd Nature,LLC(2N) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 134) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 134) U.S.Forest Service-Pacific Southwest Research O Pat Manley-U.S.Forest Service-Pacific Southwest Station(USFS-PSW) Research Station(USFS-PSW) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/69) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/69) EIP BASICS q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/05.01.02.0099) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/05.01.02.0099) O Ell P Focus Area 05-Applied Science(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detai1/5) AEIP Program 05.01 -Applied Science Program(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/9) AEIP Action Priority 05.01.02-Applied Research(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/26) A Project 05.01.02.0099-P042:Quantification and Characterization of Trout Creek Restoration Effectiveness EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No annual performance measure accomplishments entered for this project. EXPECTED FUNDING https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3950 2/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.02.0099-P042:Quantification and Characterization of Trout Creek Restoration Effectiveness AEstimated Total Cost $243,073 ASecured Funding $243,073 AUnfunded Need $0 Funding Sources OFunding Source ASecured Funding oTargeted Funding Total Unknown or Unassigned(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1168) $243,073 $0 $243,073 Total $243,073 $0 $243,073 REPORTED EXPENDITURES 0 Funding Source 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act(Pacifi... $40,512 $40,512 $40,513 $40,512 $40,512 $40,512 $243,073 (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/1167) Total $40,512 $40,512 $40,513 $40,512 $40,512 $40,512 $243,073 PHOTOS No photos available. o WATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. ATHRESHOLD CATEGORIES ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality):The restoration of Trout Creek is touted throughout the Basin as a very successful restoration and is an ideal analog of an existing desired condition of Lake Tahoe restored meadow and stream complex. This research will use Trout Creek as a desired condition analog to integrate,focus and apply both simple and more complex observations and protocols being developed. e LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS No Local and Regional Plans set for this project. OEXTERNAL LINKS Tahoe Science Research Partnerships(https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/partnerships/tahoescience/)G (https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/partnerships/tahoescience/) NOTES https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3950 3/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.02.0099-P042:Quantification and Characterization of Trout Creek Restoration Effectiveness 09/07/2017 9:14 PM System Objectives: This report and associated digital Stream Load Reduction Tool(SLRTv1)calculation templates are the final products for two complementary research efforts(Projects 042 and 074)funded by the USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station using funds from South Nevada Public Lands Management Act(SNPLMA)research grants.The combined research goals were to obtain and leverage stream environment zone(SEZ) specific data to develop a methodology that estimates the average annual pollutant load reduction associated with SEZ restoration efforts. The goals of this project were to: •Apply the standardized approach of both simple and complex observations of Trout Creek to characterize pre and post-restoration stream reach condition by implementing the methodology and protocols of previously funded SNPLMA research(Round 7 and Round 8). •Develop a simple methodology for the Stream Load Reduction Tool for local resource managers to predict the relative water quality benefits(total and fine sediment load reductions)as a result of stream morphologic modifications and floodplain restoration efforts using Trout Creek and Upper Truckee River as the tangible examples. •Enable load reductions from stream restoration to be accounted for in the Lake Tahoe total maximum daily load(TMDL)and Lake Clarity Crediting Programs. 09/07/2017 9:13 PM System Findings: •Reach scale water quality monitoring was conducted during two consecutive overbank snowmelt events(WY10 and WY11)to quantify the FSP load differences introduced to and exported from the restored Upper Reach of Trout Creek over the duration of the events. WY10 and WY11 reach scale monitoring identified significant FSP load reductions measured across the reach for each overbank event of 4.9 and 9.4 MT respectively. 09/07/2017 9:13 PM System Management Implications: •A successful restoration of self-sustaining fluvial processes is expected to reduce pollutant inputs from chronic bank and bed erosion and increase pollutant retention on the floodplain as a result of increasing the frequency and duration of overbank flows. Significant temporal and financial requirements make the quantification of the actual long- term water quality benefit of a restored SEZ extremely challenging.The episodic nature of elevated flow conditions that cause erosion and/or inundate the floodplain means these events are unpredictable,infrequent and costly to monitor.In order to adequately capture and constrain the long term variability of the hydrology conditions that drive the water quality signal,consistent monitoring would need to be conducted for decades. •The measured reach scale load reductions and the floodplain specific sampling conducted on both Trout Creek and the Upper Truckee River provide undeniable evidence that long term FSP load reductions can be achieved as a result of successful SEZ restoration efforts. 09/07/2017 9:12 PM System Publications:www.fs.fed.us/PSW/partnerships/tahoescience 2NDNATURE,Quantification and Characterization of Trout Creek Restoration Effectiveness and Stream Load Reduction Tool(SLRTv1)Technical document/user guidance,Final Report, July 2013. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3950 4/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 105.01.02.0099-P042:Quantification and Characterization of Trout Creek Restoration Effectiveness Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform maybe freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfiirma.com)on GitHub(https:Hgithub.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa @trpa.o rg)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3950 5/5 8/19/2019 LT Info 106.01.03.0014-Streets and Roads Operations and Maintenance-Placer County (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/) Data Center(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/DataCenter) Request Support(/Help/Support) Log in(https://laketahoeinfo.org/Account/LogOn?returnUrl=https%3a%2f%2flaketahoeinfo.org%2fProject%2fDetaiI%2f3732) Project (https:#Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/FullProjectList) ` 06.01.03.0014 - Streets and Roads Operations and Maintenance - Placer ... (https://eip.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/FactSheet/06.01.03.0014) (https://transportation.laketahoe!nfo.org/Project/Index) BASICS •Project Description Annual Streets and Roads Operations and Maintenance(existing,does not reflect future TMDL implementation)-Placer County.This includes all on- going,recurring costs for operations and maintenance of roadways.One-time maintenance is tracked under a different project.Annual operations and maintenance costs must be tracked as part of the Regional Transportation Plan Update.Tahoe Roads Department. •Stage Implementation •Planning/Design Start Year 2015 •Implementation Start Year 2015 •Completion Year 2040 •Estimated Total Cost •Primary Contact Kansas McGahan(kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov(mailto:kmcgahan@placer.ca.gov)) •Added On 01/20/2017 •Last Updated 01/30/2019 LOCATION https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3732 1/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 106.01.03.0014-Streets and Roads Operations and Maintenance-Placer County To zoom,hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle. + T LF_k•3- ...,: . Kings B��cli �J Location Information Location Notes Named Area:Placer County,CA Area Type:Jurisdiction ORGANIZATIONS AOrganization OLead Implementer 0implementer OFunder 0 Primary Contact Placer County,CA(PLCO) G O Kansas McGahan-Placer County,CA(PLCO) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l 6) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/16) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(TRPA) O Kimberly Caringer-Tahoe Regional Planning (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/l8) Agency(TRPA) (https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Organization/Detail/18) EIP BASICS Q VIEW EIP FACT SHEET(HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FACTSHEET/06.01.03.0014) I VIEW FUNDING REQUEST SHEET (HTTPS://EIP.LAKETAHOEINFO.ORG/PROJECT/FUNDINGREQUESTSHEET/06.01.03.0014) A EIP Focus Area 06-Program Support(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/6) AEIP Program 06.01 -Program Support,Reporting,and Technical Assistance(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPProgram/Detail/l2) A EIP Action Priority 06.01.03-Operations and Maintenance of Capital Projects(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPActionPriority/Detail/30) A Project 06.01.03.0014-Streets and Roads Operations and Maintenance-Placer County This project is on the EIP 5-year list(https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/Project/FiveYearList). TRANSPORTATION BASICS ATransportation Strategy Operations&Maintenance(Non-Transit)(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationStrategy/Detail/4) ATransportation Objective Roadway O&M(On-going)(https://transportation.laketahoeinfo.org/TransportationObjective/Detail/10) AThis project is on the Federal Transportation Improvement Program(FTIP)list No https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3732 2/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 106.01.03.0014-Streets and Roads Operations and Maintenance-Placer County A Funding Type Operations and Maintenance Funding Details This project is a Transportation Operations and Maintenance project with recurring annual costs. A Est.Annual Operating Cost $400,000 A Remaining Operating Cost $14,666,611 (For years 2017-2040 using 3.50%annual inflation) ESTIMATED BUDGETS r� No budgets have been entered for this project. EXPECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES No expected performance measures set for this project. REPORTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Miles of Street Sweeping(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Indicator/Detail/6/Overview) A Subcategories Equipment Type Property Ownership 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Units High-Efficiency Vacuum-Assisted Dry Sweeper Placer County 2,986 3,000 3,000 3,000 11,986 miles Total 2,986 3,000 3,000 3,000 11,986 miles EXPECTED FUNDING Expected Funding is not applicable to Transportation O&M projects. REPORTED EXPENDITURES 0 Funding Source 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Placer County General Fund(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detai1/55) $170,000 $195,000 $200,000 $375,000 $940,000 TRPA Operations&Maintenance Funds(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/FundingSource/Detail/l 106) $40,000 $0 $0 $25,000 $65,000 Total $210,000 $195,000 $200,000 $400,000 $1,005,000 PHOTOS No photos available. e WATERSHEDS No watersheds set for this project. eTHRESHOLD CATEGORIES https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detai1/3732 3/4 8/19/2019 LT Info 106.01.03.0014-Streets and Roads Operations and Maintenance-Placer County ■ Water Quality(https://thresholds.laketahoeinfo.org/ThresholdCategory/Detail/WaterQuality) e LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS ■ Linking Tahoe-Regional Transportation Plan 2016 Constrained List(https://Iaketahoeinfo.org/LocalAndRegionalPlan/Detail/l2) AEXTERNAL LINKS No external links entered. NOTES No notes entered. Implementation&Hosting by Sitka Technology Group(http://sitkatech.com) Portions of the Lake Tahoe Info platform may be freely modified and redistributed.The open source version of the EIP Project Tracker is available as ProjectFirma(https://projectfirma.com)on GitHub(https://github.com/sitkatech/projectfirma).The source code for the Stormwater Tools is available upon request.Other components of LT Info are available via commercial licensing through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(trpa@trpa.org (ma i Ito:trpa@trpa.org)). Copyright(C)2019 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency(http://trpa.org)I Version 1.9.1947.0 1 Compiled 2019-08-06 20:34:04 https:Hlaketahoeinfo.org/Project/Detail/3732 4/4