Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025.02.20 Attachments Combined OC) Y ACWA JPIA Update South Tahoe Public Utility District Jennifer Jobe, Director of Pooled Programs � Adam Dedmon, Employee Benefits Manager N r "A Partnership of Public Water Agencies JPI Impof What is t PLA A Partnership of the JPIA and 403 California �� • Water Agencies Only Public Water Agencies Membership Requirements Long-term Relationships with Members Membership Governance AL Board of Directors [Personnel Committee [Executive Committee Finance & Audit Committee ell— LiabilityPro Property Program Workers' Employee Benefits gram p y g Compensation p oyee e Committee Committee M P Program Committee Program Committee JVIARisk Management California Water Committee Insurance Fund (CWIF) ti \ Liability Property Programs Workers' Employee Comp Benefits Membershi Sna shot p p General Liability - 348 Property - 290 Workers' Compensation - 208 Employee Benefits - 269 80 160 240 320 Employee Benefits Program "Ai JPI , pl • Benef'Its MLWM • 269 Members 2025 Program Hi-lights : • Medical - 18,352 lives Monitor PBM • Dental - 21,590 lives Encourage utilization : • Vision — 21,893 lives • preventive care & 2025 Rates : • self-funded PPO +10% wellness • dental/vision - flat Carrum - $250 incentive • insured programs — flat to +7.83% MODERN . � Hinge Health A& HEALTH JJ P1 .A 0Orgyy carrum health Smarter Fertility Benefits • n-1 iwiPT7 I Fast Facts 00-r" Tqh Joined JPIA Employee Benefits: 2013 - - - IISO . D1Sxg Medical - Incentive rate; Vision Cover active employees only, no retirees no directors. 121 Medical 56% 68 Anthem Classic PPO 44% 53 Anthem CDHP 121 Vision 3' P I A f H 'istor'ical Rates 2,000.00 1,800.00 1,600.00 1,400.00 1,200.00 1,000.00 '• 800.00 � T+ 600.00 1 400.00 200.00 LJ, PXIA1 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Thank you ! _ ►�o Some time for questions Pi SOUTH TAHOF STPUD Stateline Test WeLL Projecty - .oGetle UTILITY Dl a`G � 1 Mark Seelos Water Resources Manager February 20, 2025 SOUTH TAHOF Outline A4epy , \ 1C UTILITY Dla 1 . Water SuppLyChaLLenges Recap 2 . Conventional Zone Testin 3 . BESST Method 4 . Proposed Work 2 Water Supply Challenges SOUTH Tgy0,e SupysortageinStateine l h Zone �UT,L,T- , p Firm Capacity: Suppliers must meet Maximum Daily Demand with largest unit off line (CCR Tit. 22, § 64554) OUT OF Bayview WeLL offline: Short of MDD in SERVICE Stateline Zone by 1 ,250 GPM. SmartStnmw•800-952-1457•9-9398 G rou ped Zones MDID (mgd) Total Supply Firm Supply Surplus/Deficit Stateline Zones 10.41 14.10 8.94 -1.50 Meyers Zones 2.00 5.33 3.17 1.17 Kennedy Jenks, 2022 Water SuppLy • Low at JU Minimum Pressure • • 1Model Simulationof72-hour ' period of . • Pressures near H Street Zone: ,r fj r Legend Water Tank Minimum Pressure f • 0 0 •,�ate ;►• � ,� ,•• .. .0 00 80.00 :0 - Water Main StatelineZone Pressure Zones 1 1 1 � _ Water Supply Challenges g0UTH TgyDe SUPPI Vulnerability in Me ers A4et'C UTILITy y Bakersfield Well Arsenic 10 Firm Capacity excess of —965 gpm, but: MCL Bakersfield Well produces —60% of water in Meyers and is threatened by 9 rising Arsenic. 45% of pumping capacity in Meyers . • requires wellhead treatment to meet s water quality standards. Q { 7 Lost redundancy in Meyers reduces redundancy in Stateline Zone via Gardner Mountain. 2015 2020 Sample Date Water Supply Challenges g0U H TAyoe ncre as � n Water Demand �T,L,TYo� a�°� f _ ` 2023 Demand : 6,438 AFY i 2045 Demand : 6,972 AFY (2020 UWMP District Demand + 10%) Full buildout: 10,808 AFY (2020 Water Demand Analysis) { MDD TTT I Al Groundwater DeveLopment Process SOUTH TgyOF_ ,\ A4etle UTILITY Dl a`G Desk Study Test HoLes V VULL 1 1 1 Construction 6j Qcosnr lricm'I r Volume t`! Iy ,� L�ntvl�ra4! •wa.,Tank' -- - -- 14 Aquuifer — Clay Wund Cvpillury - ❑bares warm Serra ■Air e rr- 7 a �.� ._. r r�IIVol,= � �� TangLewood �■ ► � , VIA Ski > Conventional Zone Testing g0U H TgyOe LithoLogic Log and Borehole Geophysics /CJU J ILITY Gamma Ray Depth Res istivilyohm-m Lilhology 0 API 150 Feet 0.2 Medium Resist%ty 200 Spontaneous Potential ` Cr------MiFliaoRs -----200 02 f3eepResistively 2�0 0.2 Shallow Resistivity 200 .r—'r. Cook Mtn.Fm �t 250 ——— _ WBZ? O WBZ? ---_y_ 350 WBZ,, Lithologic Log while Drilling ti ■ 1 400 _ Electrical Logs -�• ==_ Resistivity • Gamma Ray WO Spontaneous Potential Y ti 850 WBZ? w ❑e TIC y W i # 750 1 i r y Y �y Conventional Zone Testing g0UTH TgyDe BackfiLL Zone Test e l * \ 4e�� UTILITY Dla`G ST -: ANDARD w ` �\ Pilot Hole Instaliation Treat, Blend and Failure or Abandon Catpe Study i n Hri,, Tsms Use Dri I I Pipe with Sty Rpe genic Zone Test Rases "ded valuar. Real Values Clay-or Tolel As in Pilot Hole Total As- Tram IND MCL = 10 NWL + ■ F 25 w g 28 �_ ■ � 13 a 15 20-W . � F 1.3 onoentration (per,E Concentration (p ) 10 1 � % - o � o orl oel= CD M ■ v c - wyN • 4 ,6 #' MW_7 •' iS S �,. __ ti� . �,r,.•.. Yam- . - ,.,..._ �, -,�- - . ,:�v-' • � �Mml fill { I M 3 IV r tiny,, { ���'• • 3 j 20 40 i ✓_ 1000 M ~ Z0DO � 3 3000 0 --------------- ------ -- - - - - - - - - - - ------------------ 1 1s 0 = 30 ?. d -- -- -- - - - - ----------------- 60 90 C 120 0 v - -- - - - - ------------------ 500 g v -- ---- ----- ------ -- - -- --- -- ------------------ 10004 a r N H 44 0 - c 10 'v 15 * c_: 20 25 0 55 n v 100 ° 5 a pp 150 `m0 a1 p v n o 14 B ESST Method SOUTH TgyOF A4et'C UTILITY Dto' ! Reaming Fiberglass Test Well to Construct Municipal Supply Well IN l {4Z 1 r �r.]. • .d• j. p T" k- 2025 Test Hole Project SOUTH TA"oe fd BESSTINC. � Proposed Scope of Work GLOBNAL�L SUBSURFACE AGet'C UTILITY DlTECHS��`G� .;; OGIES 1 . Planning and Bid Support: Spring 2025 2. Construction Management: Summer 2025 �t�;,;. • Finalize Contract and Specifications • Plan and oversee test well construction. • Answer questions from bidders. • Lithologic and Electrical Logs • Attend pre-bid and preconstruction • Specify test well design based on logs. meetings. • Conventional Pumping Tests 3. Well Testing: Summer 2025 4. Reporting and Recommendations: Fall 2025 h • Apply BESST method to produce high Well completion reports { resolution profiles of yield and water quality from three test wells. Zone test analyses • Design of production well(s) 2025 Test Hole Project g0U H TgyOe Estimated Costs.,� 1C UTILITY DASTaG Summer 2025 (Information Gathering): • Consultant (BESST, Inc.): $425,407 • Drilling Contractor: $1 .5 M to $2M • Total: N$2M - $2.5M Production Well, Instrumentation, and Controls: • Design: Est. $500,000 • Construction: Est. $3M h • Total: N$3.5 15 DriLL • er? SO 7�L 7 le UTILITY ,.s r v, * ✓. L rr�( District LocaL Area TechnicaL Assistance Grant01 Funded Project � 1 Update Chris Skelly IT Manager Overview • Project was executed after IT Strategic Plan Update in 2023 after consistent feedback from District departments noted "connectivity in the field" was needed. • CPUC Funded the planning project through the Local Area Technical Assistance (LATA) grant program • The federal government, along with the State of California, is providing significant funding opportunities to help close the digital divide and expand broadband access across communities. • These initiatives, aimed at enhancing connectivity, are especially impactful for local municipalities looking to bridge the gap in digital equity. I • Key funding programs • Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) • American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) • California's California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) SOUTH TAH00 A`eCIC UTILITY DlplG� Process Is Broadband . • . • Asset Inventory PoLicy and ReguLatory Review StakehoLder Engagement Conceptual. • D ' • l �I / * District's Capital. Project Review Broadband and Provider I-Technology Type Asset Wired-DSL(Copper) ,� 11.9k Licensed Fixed Wireless 35 Wired-HFC 16.9k HughesNet Satellite 17.2k Preferred Networks,Inc Unlicensed Fixed Wireless 687 r Starlink Satellite 17.2k T-Mobile US Licensed Fixed Wireless 11.4k -� CommunicationsTPx Wired-Varies 9 • Licensed Fixed Wireless 11.4k Visasat, Inc. Satellite 17.2k Address Locations Y Per Speed Category V H,..y».rr r.ArSD .•il'1 " 4'aiiEY Total Addresses 17.3 k $DU r TAHOO ■weflse..,edl>=laaon000l 1: , a► M + msn ■llnserved f<2513,or No 310 wireline Conneaeon) Y 'f ldf ❑lemon❑ y � In.YASA,NGA,u5G5',Cou laz County,NV-GIB i)epx Caikunia Srara ParFs,Esri,TomTom,Garmin,SafeGraph_.- Powered by ESri A4QC1C UTILITY DIP`G PoLicy and R • Review • California law grants PUDs, Cities, and Counties the authority to construct, own, and operate broadband networks. • SB 156 - allocates funds for broadband expansion in underserved areas. • P3 Contracting and Operations A local government agency may enter into contracts with private entities if a public or municipally owned broadband network is chosen as the preferred model. • FUNDING SERVICES • BEAD / CALIFORNIA ADVANCED SERVICES FUND (CASF) / LOAN LOSS RESERVE FUND / FFA $o�'r Tg1100 A`eCM UTILITY 01 plG� Stakeholder Engagement Common needs determined by the analysis of the stakeholder data collection • Addressing internet service availability and reliability • Strengthening communications capabilities 10 Ensuring infrastructure enables consistent, continuous communications • Assessing technology options to provide network resiliency I • Strategic planning and coordination to address local permitting processes • Project management and communication to address obstacles to Dig Once policies $D%j'fH Tg1100 A`eCIC UTILITY DlplG� Stakeholders • District • Liberty Utilities • Customer Service • City of South Lake Tahoe • Engineering • Lake Tahoe Community • Operations College • Tahoe Transportation District I • Southwest Gas • Tahoe Prosperity Center $CTHTAH00 • Tahoe Regional Planning Agency A`eCIC UTILITY 01 plG Conceptual esign Al "if aY ateline , etifivu) rl Scenic ` 40. c ar n alle ;nLeafLa 0. �� a ly ��tia� the a fall Lea sTtio —Fiber cable Feeder hub dow Tahoe Golf Course e Par —Feeder cable Distribution hub —Distribution cable !N Feeder splice Distribution dedicated hub —Drop cable ® Drop hub O Distribution splice IM Fountain • Network Design and Echo Lake ' Technology Selection Phillips • Infrastructure Requirements $D%JTH TAyo'. � Nebelhorn • Geographic and Demographic y _ =sorl0 Considerations A`eCfC UTILITY DtA`DC J - District's CapitaL Project ev'iew • District has several upcoming capital improvement projects that may present significant opportunities for ISPs or stakeholders located in the South Lake Tahoe region to collaborate and split trench costs. • The District can engage with ISPs currently operating in the District's footprint well in advance of these projects to explore possible collaboration. By following Dig Once policies mentioned above, ISPs could, if feasible, design the necessary Y infrastructure, including innerduct and handholes, along the designated water or sewer line routes. This would allow ISPs to procure and install materials concurrently with the capital projects, significantly reducing the cost of burying fiber. S00TH iAllot AGe`rC UTILITY to), G,C Next S • Provide Access to the District's Broadband Atlas and other reports and resources to stakeholders. • Open communication with partners and stakeholders for future opportunities. Questions? I $��TH TAtfOt A4e�IC UTILITY 01Stp��