HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025.02.20 Attachments Combined OC)
Y
ACWA JPIA Update
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Jennifer Jobe, Director of Pooled Programs �
Adam Dedmon, Employee Benefits Manager
N r
"A Partnership of Public Water Agencies
JPI
Impof
What is t PLA
A Partnership
of the JPIA
and 403
California
�� • Water Agencies
Only Public Water Agencies
Membership Requirements
Long-term Relationships with
Members
Membership Governance
AL
Board of Directors
[Personnel Committee [Executive Committee Finance & Audit
Committee
ell—
LiabilityPro Property Program Workers' Employee Benefits
gram p y g Compensation p oyee e
Committee Committee M P Program Committee
Program Committee
JVIARisk Management California Water
Committee Insurance Fund (CWIF)
ti \
Liability Property
Programs
Workers' Employee
Comp Benefits
Membershi Sna shot
p p
General Liability - 348
Property - 290
Workers' Compensation - 208
Employee Benefits - 269
80 160 240 320
Employee Benefits
Program "Ai
JPI
, pl • Benef'Its
MLWM
• 269 Members 2025 Program Hi-lights :
• Medical - 18,352 lives Monitor PBM
• Dental - 21,590 lives Encourage utilization :
• Vision — 21,893 lives
• preventive care &
2025 Rates :
• self-funded PPO +10% wellness
• dental/vision - flat Carrum - $250 incentive
• insured programs — flat to +7.83%
MODERN . �
Hinge Health A& HEALTH
JJ P1 .A 0Orgyy carrum health
Smarter Fertility Benefits
• n-1 iwiPT7
I
Fast Facts
00-r" Tqh
Joined JPIA Employee Benefits: 2013 - - -
IISO . D1Sxg
Medical - Incentive rate; Vision
Cover active employees only, no retirees no directors.
121 Medical
56%
68 Anthem Classic PPO
44% 53 Anthem CDHP
121 Vision
3' P I
A f
H 'istor'ical Rates
2,000.00
1,800.00
1,600.00
1,400.00
1,200.00
1,000.00 '•
800.00 � T+
600.00
1
400.00
200.00
LJ, PXIA1 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Thank you ! _ ►�o
Some time for
questions
Pi
SOUTH TAHOF
STPUD Stateline Test WeLL Projecty -
.oGetle UTILITY Dl a`G
� 1
Mark Seelos
Water Resources Manager
February 20, 2025
SOUTH TAHOF
Outline
A4epy ,
\ 1C UTILITY Dla
1 . Water SuppLyChaLLenges Recap
2 . Conventional Zone Testin
3 . BESST Method
4 . Proposed Work
2
Water Supply Challenges SOUTH Tgy0,e
SupysortageinStateine l h Zone �UT,L,T- , p
Firm Capacity: Suppliers must meet
Maximum Daily Demand with largest unit
off line (CCR Tit. 22, § 64554)
OUT OF
Bayview WeLL offline: Short of MDD in
SERVICE Stateline Zone by 1 ,250 GPM.
SmartStnmw•800-952-1457•9-9398
G rou ped Zones MDID (mgd) Total Supply Firm Supply Surplus/Deficit
Stateline Zones 10.41 14.10 8.94 -1.50
Meyers Zones 2.00 5.33 3.17 1.17
Kennedy Jenks, 2022
Water SuppLy •
Low
at
JU
Minimum Pressure
• •
1Model Simulationof72-hour
' period of . •
Pressures near H Street Zone:
,r fj r
Legend
Water Tank
Minimum Pressure
f
• 0 0 •,�ate ;►•
� ,� ,•• ..
.0 00
80.00
:0
- Water Main
StatelineZone
Pressure Zones 1 1 1 �
_
Water Supply Challenges g0UTH TgyDe
SUPPI Vulnerability in Me ers A4et'C UTILITy y
Bakersfield Well Arsenic
10 Firm Capacity excess of —965 gpm, but:
MCL Bakersfield Well produces —60% of
water in Meyers and is threatened by
9 rising Arsenic.
45% of pumping capacity in Meyers
. • requires wellhead treatment to meet
s
water quality standards.
Q
{ 7 Lost redundancy in Meyers reduces
redundancy in Stateline Zone via
Gardner Mountain.
2015 2020
Sample Date
Water Supply Challenges g0U H TAyoe
ncre as � n Water Demand �T,L,TYo� a�°�
f _ ` 2023 Demand : 6,438 AFY
i
2045 Demand : 6,972 AFY
(2020 UWMP District Demand + 10%)
Full buildout: 10,808 AFY
(2020 Water Demand Analysis)
{ MDD TTT
I
Al
Groundwater DeveLopment Process SOUTH TgyOF_
,\ A4etle UTILITY Dl a`G
Desk Study Test HoLes V VULL
1 1 1
Construction
6j Qcosnr lricm'I r Volume t`! Iy ,�
L�ntvl�ra4!
•wa.,Tank' -- - --
14 Aquuifer
— Clay Wund Cvpillury -
❑bares warm
Serra ■Air
e
rr- 7
a
�.� ._.
r r�IIVol,= � ��
TangLewood
�■ ► � ,
VIA
Ski
>
Conventional Zone Testing g0U H TgyOe
LithoLogic Log and Borehole Geophysics /CJU
J ILITY
Gamma Ray Depth Res istivilyohm-m Lilhology
0 API 150 Feet 0.2 Medium Resist%ty 200
Spontaneous Potential
` Cr------MiFliaoRs -----200 02 f3eepResistively 2�0
0.2 Shallow Resistivity 200
.r—'r. Cook
Mtn.Fm
�t 250 ——— _ WBZ?
O
WBZ?
---_y_ 350 WBZ,, Lithologic Log while Drilling
ti
■ 1
400 _
Electrical Logs
-�• ==_ Resistivity
• Gamma Ray
WO
Spontaneous Potential
Y
ti 850
WBZ?
w ❑e
TIC y W
i #
750 1
i r
y Y
�y
Conventional Zone Testing g0UTH TgyDe
BackfiLL Zone Test e l
* \ 4e�� UTILITY Dla`G
ST
-:
ANDARD w `
�\ Pilot Hole Instaliation Treat, Blend
and Failure or Abandon
Catpe Study i n Hri,, Tsms
Use Dri I I Pipe with Sty Rpe genic Zone Test Rases
"ded valuar. Real Values
Clay-or Tolel As in Pilot Hole Total As- Tram
IND MCL = 10 NWL
+ ■ F
25
w g 28
�_ ■ � 13
a 15
20-W . � F 1.3
onoentration (per,E Concentration (p )
10
1 � %
-
o � o orl
oel= CD M
■ v c
- wyN • 4
,6 #'
MW_7 •' iS S
�,. __ ti� . �,r,.•.. Yam- . - ,.,..._ �, -,�- - . ,:�v-' • �
�Mml fill
{
I M
3
IV r tiny,, { ���'• •
3 j
20
40
i
✓_
1000 M
~ Z0DO � 3
3000
0
--------------- ------ -- - - - - - - - - - - ------------------ 1
1s
0 =
30 ?. d
-- -- -- - - - - -----------------
60
90 C
120
0 v
- -- - - - - ------------------ 500 g v
-- ---- ----- ------ -- - -- --- -- ------------------ 10004 a
r
N H
44
0
- c
10 'v
15 * c_:
20
25
0
55 n
v
100 ° 5 a pp
150 `m0 a1 p
v
n o
14
B ESST Method SOUTH TgyOF
A4et'C UTILITY Dto'
! Reaming Fiberglass Test Well to Construct Municipal Supply Well
IN
l {4Z
1
r �r.]. • .d• j. p
T" k-
2025 Test Hole Project SOUTH TA"oe
fd BESSTINC. �
Proposed Scope of Work GLOBNAL�L SUBSURFACE AGet'C UTILITY DlTECHS��`G�
.;; OGIES
1 . Planning and Bid Support: Spring 2025 2. Construction Management: Summer 2025
�t�;,;. • Finalize Contract and Specifications • Plan and oversee test well construction.
• Answer questions from bidders. • Lithologic and Electrical Logs
• Attend pre-bid and preconstruction • Specify test well design based on logs.
meetings.
• Conventional Pumping Tests
3. Well Testing: Summer 2025 4. Reporting and Recommendations: Fall 2025
h
• Apply BESST method to produce high Well completion reports
{ resolution profiles of yield and water
quality from three test wells. Zone test analyses
• Design of production well(s)
2025 Test Hole Project g0U H TgyOe
Estimated Costs.,� 1C UTILITY DASTaG
Summer 2025 (Information Gathering):
• Consultant (BESST, Inc.): $425,407
• Drilling Contractor: $1 .5 M to $2M
• Total: N$2M - $2.5M
Production Well, Instrumentation, and Controls:
• Design: Est. $500,000
• Construction: Est. $3M
h
• Total: N$3.5
15
DriLL • er? SO
7�L 7
le UTILITY
,.s r
v,
* ✓. L rr�(
District LocaL Area
TechnicaL
Assistance Grant01
Funded Project
� 1
Update
Chris Skelly IT Manager
Overview
• Project was executed after IT Strategic Plan Update in 2023 after consistent
feedback from District departments noted "connectivity in the field" was needed.
• CPUC Funded the planning project through the Local Area Technical Assistance
(LATA) grant program
• The federal government, along with the State of California, is providing significant
funding opportunities to help close the digital divide and expand broadband access
across communities.
• These initiatives, aimed at enhancing connectivity, are especially impactful for
local municipalities looking to bridge the gap in digital equity.
I • Key funding programs
• Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)
• American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
• California's California Advanced Services Fund (CASF)
SOUTH TAH00
A`eCIC UTILITY DlplG�
Process
Is Broadband . • . • Asset Inventory
PoLicy and ReguLatory Review
StakehoLder Engagement
Conceptual. • D ' •
l �I / * District's Capital. Project Review
Broadband and
Provider I-Technology Type Asset
Wired-DSL(Copper) ,� 11.9k
Licensed Fixed Wireless 35
Wired-HFC 16.9k
HughesNet Satellite 17.2k
Preferred Networks,Inc Unlicensed Fixed Wireless 687 r
Starlink Satellite 17.2k
T-Mobile US Licensed Fixed Wireless 11.4k -�
CommunicationsTPx Wired-Varies 9
• Licensed Fixed Wireless 11.4k
Visasat, Inc. Satellite 17.2k
Address Locations Y
Per Speed Category V
H,..y».rr r.ArSD
.•il'1 " 4'aiiEY
Total Addresses
17.3 k
$DU r TAHOO ■weflse..,edl>=laaon000l 1: , a► M +
msn
■llnserved f<2513,or No 310
wireline Conneaeon) Y 'f ldf ❑lemon❑
y � In.YASA,NGA,u5G5',Cou laz County,NV-GIB i)epx Caikunia Srara ParFs,Esri,TomTom,Garmin,SafeGraph_.- Powered by ESri
A4QC1C UTILITY DIP`G
PoLicy and R
•
Review
• California law grants PUDs, Cities, and Counties the authority to
construct, own, and operate broadband networks.
• SB 156 - allocates funds for broadband expansion in
underserved areas.
• P3 Contracting and Operations
A local government agency may enter into contracts with private
entities if a public or municipally owned broadband network is
chosen as the preferred model.
• FUNDING SERVICES
• BEAD / CALIFORNIA ADVANCED SERVICES FUND (CASF) / LOAN LOSS
RESERVE FUND / FFA
$o�'r Tg1100
A`eCM UTILITY 01 plG�
Stakeholder
Engagement
Common needs determined by the analysis of the stakeholder data
collection
• Addressing internet service availability and reliability
• Strengthening communications capabilities
10 Ensuring infrastructure enables consistent, continuous communications
• Assessing technology options to provide network resiliency
I
• Strategic planning and coordination to address local permitting processes
• Project management and communication to address obstacles to Dig Once
policies
$D%j'fH Tg1100
A`eCIC UTILITY DlplG�
Stakeholders
• District • Liberty Utilities
• Customer Service • City of South Lake Tahoe
• Engineering • Lake Tahoe Community
• Operations College
• Tahoe Transportation
District
I
• Southwest Gas
• Tahoe Prosperity Center
$CTHTAH00 • Tahoe Regional Planning
Agency
A`eCIC UTILITY 01 plG
Conceptual
esign
Al "if
aY
ateline ,
etifivu)
rl Scenic `
40.
c ar n
alle
;nLeafLa 0. �� a
ly ��tia� the a
fall Lea sTtio —Fiber cable Feeder hub
dow Tahoe Golf Course
e Par —Feeder cable Distribution hub
—Distribution cable !N Feeder splice
Distribution dedicated hub
—Drop cable ® Drop hub O Distribution splice
IM Fountain
• Network Design and
Echo Lake
' Technology Selection
Phillips
• Infrastructure Requirements
$D%JTH TAyo'. � Nebelhorn • Geographic and Demographic y _
=sorl0 Considerations
A`eCfC UTILITY DtA`DC J -
District's CapitaL Project
ev'iew
• District has several upcoming capital improvement projects that
may present significant opportunities for ISPs or stakeholders
located in the South Lake Tahoe region to collaborate and split
trench costs.
• The District can engage with ISPs currently operating in the
District's footprint well in advance of these projects to explore
possible collaboration. By following Dig Once policies
mentioned above, ISPs could, if feasible, design the necessary
Y
infrastructure, including innerduct and handholes, along the
designated water or sewer line routes. This would allow ISPs to
procure and install materials concurrently with the capital
projects, significantly reducing the cost of burying fiber.
S00TH iAllot
AGe`rC UTILITY to), G,C
Next S
• Provide Access to the District's Broadband Atlas and other
reports and resources to stakeholders.
• Open communication with partners and stakeholders for future
opportunities.
Questions?
I
$��TH TAtfOt
A4e�IC UTILITY 01Stp��