HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTPUD 2025 LSL Inventory -proposal scoring criteriaSOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
Jan-25 Consultant:
PROJECT : LSL Inventory
Reviewer:
PROPOSAL EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA
** SCORES DUE TO JULIE BY 5 PM ON THUESDAY, FEB 11**
CRITERIA DESCRIPTION WEIGHTING SCORE (1-4) NOTES
1
Rank the overall completeness of the submittal. Was it received on time? Does it
include all components requested in the RFP? Has rate sheet been included
separately?
1: Proposal is incomplete or does not address key elements of the RFP.
2: Proposal addresses most elements but lacks some detail or clarity.
3: Proposal is complete and addresses all elements of the RFP with sufficient
detail.
4: Proposal is exceptionally thorough, addressing all elements of the RFP with
detailed and clear responses.
0.15
2
Rank the firm/project team in terms of professional
qualifications/experience/bench in water system management, including
strengths in database development, statistical analysis, field investigation
support, and regulatory understanding.
1: Firm/Team has minimal or no relevant experience in water system
management.
2: Firm/Team has some relevant experience but lacks substantial projects or
references.
3: Firm/Team has considerable relevant experience with several successful
projects and references.
4: Firm/Team has extensive experience, numerous successful projects, and
strong references.
0.25
3
Rank the approach, schedule and hours proposed. Does the proposal show that
the project team has a full understanding of the project? Does the proposal
provide a clear plan to complete the project in a timely and effective manner?
1: Proposal does not identify a clear approach to completing inventory, and
presents unrealistic hours/schedule for the defined tasks.
2: Approach is overly simplistic, doesn’t address the full range of considerations,
or presents unrealistic hours/scheudle for defined tasks.
3: Proposal presents a realistic plan for completeing the scope, but does not
comprehensively address the approach. Hours/schedule are realistic.
4: Proposal presents an exceptionally comprehensive and well-structured
plan, demonstrating a realistic and practical understanding of modeling needs.
Hours and schedule are realistic.
0.40
4
Rank the proposal's demonstration of the team's familiarity with the drivers,
needs, and limitations for the project. Does the proposal demonstrate an
understanding of Lead and Copper Rule and methods to comply? Does the
proposal demonstrate an understanding of the District's system and challenges
with working in Tahoe?
1: Proposal does not demonstrate a clear understanding of any of the 3
concerns (regulatory requirements, District's system, or Tahoe challenges).
2: Proposal demonstrates a clear understanding of 1 of the 3 concerns
3:Proposal demonstrates a clear understanding of 2 of the 3 concerns
4: Proposal demonstrates a clear understanding of all 3 concerns.
0.20
TOTAL 1.00 0.00
On a scale of 1 to 4 (using the guide below) rank the proposals using the following criteria and enter your scores.
2024 LSL Inventory RFP evaluationCriteria Template August 15, 2024